PaperClipAI

Jannik/PaperClipAI

0 Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git synced 2026-11-03 09:37:19 +01:00

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
DottaandPaperclip	9179d8dcc3	fix: credit Paperclip for managed OpenRouter requests (#16850 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - AI connections choose credentials and routes independently of the agent harness. > - OpenRouter assigns app credit from the final request headers. > - Harness defaults can assign Paperclip work to the underlying harness. > - This pull request applies one public Paperclip identity to managed OpenRouter requests. > - The benefit is consistent app credit across supported harnesses and internal model calls. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? App attribution for existing OpenRouter connections and explicit provider configurations. Current behavior Requests can omit attribution or carry the harness identity. Paperclip does not receive consistent credit in OpenRouter rankings. Proposed behavior Use `https://paperclip.ing`, the title `Paperclip`, and the coding categories `cloud-agent,programming-app` for managed requests to OpenRouter. Keep credentials, routing, and unrelated providers intact. Reason and benefit The provider URL identifies the app across personal and shared API keys. A search of public issues and pull requests found no duplicate attribution work. This improves existing AI connections and does not add a separate roadmap feature. ## What Changed - Add a shared attribution policy and a parity-checked copy for the standalone Runner. - Apply it to managed Codex, Claude, OpenCode, and Hermes connections, plus native Pi and explicit legacy provider configs. - Preserve attribution across Codex config filtering, Claude environment filtering, OpenCode proxy requests, and model-level overrides. - Attribute direct fast-response and decision-model requests, including custom connections to the OpenRouter endpoint. - Add positive and negative regression tests and provider attribution requirements to the connector playbook. - Advance native Pi to profile 24, preserving historical identities and binding the attribution source in its declaration and release checks. ## Verification - Final head `6df282d2a58c2698e41127443903d6fc85b4b72f`: all CI/status checks passed or were intentionally skipped; Greptile is 5/5, with zero unresolved review threads. [Final CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39274938069). - Focused server/shared/config suites: 132 tests passed before the final edge-case additions. Expanded adapter suites pass 48 tests; the final OpenCode merge passes 15 tests; global/EU/US endpoint and policy-parity suites pass 26 tests. - Focused Runner suites: 85 tests passed, including model overrides and recovery/config boundaries. Profile installation/environment/config tests subsequently passed 72 tests (one optional distribution test skipped); historical decoding passed 11 tests and updated recovery coverage passed 27 tests. The Rust profile admission test and all five native Pi launch/recovery tests passed. - All 114 managed AI connection tests pass together. They include custom-header preservation for legacy and native Claude runs, both OpenRouter and other gateways, inherited headers, and unresolved secret references. - Actual requests from installed Codex 0.160.0, Claude Code 2.1.245, OpenCode 1.18.34, Pi 0.74.0 and 1.0.0, and the managed Hermes runtime carried all four Paperclip headers. A local endpoint used dummy credentials and returned an intentional 401 after capture. Codex and Claude retry requests retained attribution. This proves outgoing header precedence; it is not a successful model-inference test. The first Claude capture had an argument-separation error and sent no request; correcting the command produced the captured requests. - A live request through `fastResponseModel` completed with `attribution verified`. OpenRouter recorded generation `gen-1792420273-Ez1GUTCc7YuZ1FJMCGob` under app ID `3118063`, at a cost of $0.00000375. The public app record maps that ID to `https://paperclip.ing/`. - Full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed, including a repeat after the review fixes. The final server build stamp records commit `6df282d2a58c2698e41127443903d6fc85b4b72f`. `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - CI first caught the stale Pi source attestation; it is now a new immutable profile. Greptile caught custom-header loss, now fixed and covered by the complete managed-connection suite. The next CI run caught the missing Docker allowlist entry for profile 24; the allowlist and release smoke pins are now synchronized. Local Docker verification cannot run because its daemon socket is absent; The exact Docker context check passed in CI on the final head. - The initial local `pnpm test:run` did not pass. It ran across source/build edits, reported chat/tool-access collection failures, three workspace-runtime failures, two new managed-header failures, one Dot Runner readiness failure, and two native-session-resume failures, and was interrupted after the final-head CI server coverage passed. Its secrets suite also reported 91 cases skipped. The isolated tool-access suite passed all 428 tests, and the complete managed-connection suite passed all 114 tests. These retries establish recovery, not the cause of the original local failures; no claim of a successful full local run is made. Final acceptance uses immutable final-head CI plus the focused local and live checks above. - Final-head CI encountered one unchanged UI assertion in `FileViewerSheet.copy.test.tsx` (missing “Copied link” feedback after clipboard completion). That shard passed on the earlier head with identical UI code, and all six clipboard tests passed locally. A timing race around the asynchronous React update is suspected but not conclusively established. The single CI retry passed, with no product/test code changed for it. The earlier failure remains part of this verification record. ## Risks - Native Pi profile 24 requires a fresh provider session when encountering a profile 23 identity; recovery tests cover that boundary. - Harness upgrades can change header precedence. The playbook requires actual request capture when changing provider paths. - Externally managed agents, unmanaged harness settings, and gateways that replace headers need separate qualification. This change does not intercept arbitrary model calls made by task scripts. - The existing OpenRouter entry for the Paperclip URL still displays an old title, “PrettyFly Opus Testing,” and no categories on the final public-page recheck. The live request received credit under that URL's app ID. Public title propagation and leaderboard placement remain controlled by OpenRouter. - Global, EU, and US OpenRouter hosts are recognized explicitly; other subdomains are not treated as OpenRouter. No database migration, credential ownership change, or Paperclip telemetry event is involved. Attribution contains public product constants only. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, shell execution, web research, and live API verification. The exact deployment identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — the focused suites listed above; the unsuccessful full local attempt is explicitly recorded, with full final-head coverage supplied by CI - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-19 10:28:53 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	a7a244ab33	feat: add company decision models with permission and cost controls (#15473 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Optional product features need small, typed model decisions. > - Each company needs to choose which shared API connection pays for those decisions. > - Calls must retain user and task permissions, budget limits, and cost attribution. > - This pull request adds a managed decision service, setup UI, and request history. > - Features can check availability cheaply and keep their existing behavior when decisions are unavailable. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Subsystem affected Server services, shared contracts, database accounting, Company Settings, and Costs. Problem or motivation Paperclip has no common decision-model service. Adding provider calls within each feature would duplicate credential access, permission checks, and billing rules. Proposed solution Let a connection manager configure one company decision model. Support OpenAI Decisions and Jev through OpenRouter. Provide a fixed setup test and metadata-only history. Default company-sponsored background decisions to on during setup, and preserve a saved off setting. Alternatives considered Per-feature credentials would duplicate existing connection management. Personal overrides and provider fallback chains add permission and billing complexity; they remain deferred. Roadmap alignment Reviewed ROADMAP.md and searched open PRs. This extends existing connection access and budget accounting. Product features that call the service remain outside this change. No matching decision-model service PR was found. ## What Changed - Add company settings, an internal `decisionModelService`, local availability checks, and trusted human, agent/run, and system contexts. - Pin Vercel AI SDK provider dependencies and adapt boolean, choice, and ordered-score decisions for both providers. Bound requests and time; disable paid retries. - Add durable invocation metadata and agentless decision ledger charges. Preserve fractional cents, pricing evidence, dispatch identity, and unresolved billing holds. - Share the company accounting lock and apply company, agent, and project budgets. Settle charges once, retain unknown holds, and recover interrupted calls without resubmission. - Reuse connection setup and management UI. Add a Decisions view under Costs, production-component Storybook coverage, database migration, and service documentation. ## Verification - Passed 166 current-code tests covering the decision service/provider, setup component, Costs, OpenAPI, and every failure from the earlier broad run. Coverage includes native SDK wire formats, refusals, billed malformed responses, permission and secret-rotation races, identity changes, concurrent budget admission, unresolved holds, agent/task deletion, and stale setup feedback. - Passed 170 existing connection, cost, budget, heartbeat-accounting, and profile regression tests. - Passed repository typecheck, production build, and design token gates after integrating master. Verified the generated migration on a fresh test database and upgraded the populated preview database from the branch's earlier migration without losing settings or usage. - Ran the required full `pnpm test:run`: its general phase completed with 16,354 passed and 10 failures across five files while this branch was still being updated. Every reported failure passes in the current-code rerun; the serialized phase did not run after that failure. The full GitHub CI suite passed on `b1b856a88`: general and serialized tests, browser shards, runner checks, typecheck, production build, packaging/canary, and policy gates. [CI evidence](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37673106360). - Passed the full-shell Storybook setup-to-history interaction test again after integrating master. Greptile rates the final revision 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. - Walked through the running app: empty setup, add each provider, save, reload, run all three sample questions, inspect fractional charges in history, switch provider while sponsorship is off, disable, and reconnect. Checked mobile settings. These tests used the actual UI, vault, server, SDKs, and database with simulated upstream responses. - Live paid setup tests remain unverified: this environment has no authorized OpenAI/OpenRouter credentials available. No mocked test is presented as live provider evidence. Reviewer journey: Company Settings → General → Decision model. Add/select a shared API connection, save, run the billed sample, open View usage, then disable decisions and verify Run test is disabled after reload. ## Risks - The SDK decision interface is experimental. Pinned versions and wire-format tests limit upgrade drift. - The migration allows agentless service charges and reservations. Existing agent cost-reporting APIs still require an agent, and decision receipts stay separate from run reconciliation. - Timeouts can have unknown provider charges. Holds remain until an audited accounting correction resolves them. - OpenAI prices use a versioned Decisions rate snapshot; OpenRouter costs use provider receipts. Unknown pricing is retained as unknown. - A configured company authorizes background spending by default. Setup explains this, and managers can turn it off. - Live provider account/model availability still needs the two credentialed acceptance checks. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and browser tools. The exact serving revision and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-07 15:53:13 -05:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

DottaandPaperclip

9179d8dcc3

fix: credit Paperclip for managed OpenRouter requests (#16850 )

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - AI connections choose credentials and routes independently of the
agent harness.
> - OpenRouter assigns app credit from the final request headers.
> - Harness defaults can assign Paperclip work to the underlying
harness.
> - This pull request applies one public Paperclip identity to managed
OpenRouter requests.
> - The benefit is consistent app credit across supported harnesses and
internal model calls.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

App attribution for existing OpenRouter connections and explicit
provider configurations.

**Current behavior**

Requests can omit attribution or carry the harness identity. Paperclip
does not receive consistent credit in OpenRouter rankings.

**Proposed behavior**

Use `https://paperclip.ing`, the title `Paperclip`, and the coding
categories `cloud-agent,programming-app` for managed requests to
OpenRouter. Keep credentials, routing, and unrelated providers intact.

**Reason and benefit**

The provider URL identifies the app across personal and shared API keys.
A search of public issues and pull requests found no duplicate
attribution work. This improves existing AI connections and does not add
a separate roadmap feature.

## What Changed

- Add a shared attribution policy and a parity-checked copy for the
standalone Runner.
- Apply it to managed Codex, Claude, OpenCode, and Hermes connections,
plus native Pi and explicit legacy provider configs.
- Preserve attribution across Codex config filtering, Claude environment
filtering, OpenCode proxy requests, and model-level overrides.
- Attribute direct fast-response and decision-model requests, including
custom connections to the OpenRouter endpoint.
- Add positive and negative regression tests and provider attribution
requirements to the connector playbook.
- Advance native Pi to profile 24, preserving historical identities and
binding the attribution source in its declaration and release checks.

## Verification

- Final head `6df282d2a58c2698e41127443903d6fc85b4b72f`: all CI/status
checks passed or were intentionally skipped; Greptile is **5/5**, with
zero unresolved review threads. [Final CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39274938069).
- Focused server/shared/config suites: 132 tests passed before the final
edge-case additions. Expanded adapter suites pass 48 tests; the final
OpenCode merge passes 15 tests; global/EU/US endpoint and policy-parity
suites pass 26 tests.
- Focused Runner suites: 85 tests passed, including model overrides and
recovery/config boundaries. Profile installation/environment/config
tests subsequently passed 72 tests (one optional distribution test
skipped); historical decoding passed 11 tests and updated recovery
coverage passed 27 tests. The Rust profile admission test and all five
native Pi launch/recovery tests passed.
- All 114 managed AI connection tests pass together. They include
custom-header preservation for legacy and native Claude runs, both
OpenRouter and other gateways, inherited headers, and unresolved secret
references.
- Actual requests from installed Codex 0.160.0, Claude Code 2.1.245,
OpenCode 1.18.34, Pi 0.74.0 and 1.0.0, and the managed Hermes runtime
carried all four Paperclip headers. A local endpoint used dummy
credentials and returned an intentional 401 after capture. Codex and
Claude retry requests retained attribution. This proves outgoing header
precedence; it is not a successful model-inference test. The first
Claude capture had an argument-separation error and sent no request;
correcting the command produced the captured requests.
- A live request through `fastResponseModel` completed with `attribution
verified`. OpenRouter recorded generation
`gen-1792420273-Ez1GUTCc7YuZ1FJMCGob` under app ID `3118063`, at a cost
of $0.00000375. The public app record maps that ID to
`https://paperclip.ing/`.
- Full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed, including a repeat
after the review fixes. The final server build stamp records commit
`6df282d2a58c2698e41127443903d6fc85b4b72f`. `pnpm check:token-gates`
passed.
- CI first caught the stale Pi source attestation; it is now a new
immutable profile. Greptile caught custom-header loss, now fixed and
covered by the complete managed-connection suite. The next CI run caught
the missing Docker allowlist entry for profile 24; the allowlist and
release smoke pins are now synchronized. Local Docker verification
cannot run because its daemon socket is absent; The exact Docker context
check passed in CI on the final head.
- The initial local `pnpm test:run` did **not** pass. It ran across
source/build edits, reported chat/tool-access collection failures, three
workspace-runtime failures, two new managed-header failures, one Dot
Runner readiness failure, and two native-session-resume failures, and
was interrupted after the final-head CI server coverage passed. Its
secrets suite also reported 91 cases skipped. The isolated tool-access
suite passed all 428 tests, and the complete managed-connection suite
passed all 114 tests. These retries establish recovery, not the cause of
the original local failures; no claim of a successful full local run is
made. Final acceptance uses immutable final-head CI plus the focused
local and live checks above.
- Final-head CI encountered one unchanged UI assertion in
`FileViewerSheet.copy.test.tsx` (missing “Copied link” feedback after
clipboard completion). That shard passed on the earlier head with
identical UI code, and all six clipboard tests passed locally. A timing
race around the asynchronous React update is suspected but not
conclusively established. The single CI retry passed, with no
product/test code changed for it. The earlier failure remains part of
this verification record.

## Risks

- Native Pi profile 24 requires a fresh provider session when
encountering a profile 23 identity; recovery tests cover that boundary.
- Harness upgrades can change header precedence. The playbook requires
actual request capture when changing provider paths.
- Externally managed agents, unmanaged harness settings, and gateways
that replace headers need separate qualification. This change does not
intercept arbitrary model calls made by task scripts.
- The existing OpenRouter entry for the Paperclip URL still displays an
old title, “PrettyFly Opus Testing,” and no categories on the final
public-page recheck. The live request received credit under that URL's
app ID. Public title propagation and leaderboard placement remain
controlled by OpenRouter.
- Global, EU, and US OpenRouter hosts are recognized explicitly; other
subdomains are not treated as OpenRouter. No database migration,
credential ownership change, or Paperclip telemetry event is involved.
Attribution contains public product constants only.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, shell
execution, web research, and live API verification. The exact deployment
identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — the focused suites listed
above; the unsuccessful full local attempt is explicitly recorded, with
full final-head coverage supplied by CI
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

2026-10-19 10:28:53 -05:00

DottaandPaperclip

a7a244ab33

feat: add company decision models with permission and cost controls (#15473 )

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Optional product features need small, typed model decisions.
> - Each company needs to choose which shared API connection pays for
those decisions.
> - Calls must retain user and task permissions, budget limits, and cost
attribution.
> - This pull request adds a managed decision service, setup UI, and
request history.
> - Features can check availability cheaply and keep their existing
behavior when decisions are unavailable.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Server services, shared contracts, database accounting, Company
Settings, and Costs.

**Problem or motivation**

Paperclip has no common decision-model service. Adding provider calls
within each feature would duplicate credential access, permission
checks, and billing rules.

**Proposed solution**

Let a connection manager configure one company decision model. Support
OpenAI Decisions and Jev through OpenRouter. Provide a fixed setup test
and metadata-only history. Default company-sponsored background
decisions to on during setup, and preserve a saved off setting.

**Alternatives considered**

Per-feature credentials would duplicate existing connection management.
Personal overrides and provider fallback chains add permission and
billing complexity; they remain deferred.

**Roadmap alignment**

Reviewed ROADMAP.md and searched open PRs. This extends existing
connection access and budget accounting. Product features that call the
service remain outside this change. No matching decision-model service
PR was found.

## What Changed

- Add company settings, an internal `decisionModelService`, local
availability checks, and trusted human, agent/run, and system contexts.
- Pin Vercel AI SDK provider dependencies and adapt boolean, choice, and
ordered-score decisions for both providers. Bound requests and time;
disable paid retries.
- Add durable invocation metadata and agentless decision ledger charges.
Preserve fractional cents, pricing evidence, dispatch identity, and
unresolved billing holds.
- Share the company accounting lock and apply company, agent, and
project budgets. Settle charges once, retain unknown holds, and recover
interrupted calls without resubmission.
- Reuse connection setup and management UI. Add a Decisions view under
Costs, production-component Storybook coverage, database migration, and
service documentation.

## Verification

- Passed 166 current-code tests covering the decision service/provider,
setup component, Costs, OpenAPI, and every failure from the earlier
broad run. Coverage includes native SDK wire formats, refusals, billed
malformed responses, permission and secret-rotation races, identity
changes, concurrent budget admission, unresolved holds, agent/task
deletion, and stale setup feedback.
- Passed 170 existing connection, cost, budget, heartbeat-accounting,
and profile regression tests.
- Passed repository typecheck, production build, and design token gates
after integrating master. Verified the generated migration on a fresh
test database and upgraded the populated preview database from the
branch's earlier migration without losing settings or usage.
- Ran the required full `pnpm test:run`: its general phase completed
with 16,354 passed and 10 failures across five files while this branch
was still being updated. Every reported failure passes in the
current-code rerun; the serialized phase did not run after that failure.
The full GitHub CI suite passed on `b1b856a88`: general and serialized
tests, browser shards, runner checks, typecheck, production build,
packaging/canary, and policy gates. [CI
evidence](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37673106360).
- Passed the full-shell Storybook setup-to-history interaction test
again after integrating master. Greptile rates the final revision 5/5
with zero unresolved threads.
- Walked through the running app: empty setup, add each provider, save,
reload, run all three sample questions, inspect fractional charges in
history, switch provider while sponsorship is off, disable, and
reconnect. Checked mobile settings. These tests used the actual UI,
vault, server, SDKs, and database with simulated upstream responses.
- Live paid setup tests remain unverified: this environment has no
authorized OpenAI/OpenRouter credentials available. No mocked test is
presented as live provider evidence.

Reviewer journey: Company Settings → General → Decision model.
Add/select a shared API connection, save, run the billed sample, open
View usage, then disable decisions and verify Run test is disabled after
reload.

## Risks

- The SDK decision interface is experimental. Pinned versions and
wire-format tests limit upgrade drift.
- The migration allows agentless service charges and reservations.
Existing agent cost-reporting APIs still require an agent, and decision
receipts stay separate from run reconciliation.
- Timeouts can have unknown provider charges. Holds remain until an
audited accounting correction resolves them.
- OpenAI prices use a versioned Decisions rate snapshot; OpenRouter
costs use provider receipts. Unknown pricing is retained as unknown.
- A configured company authorizes background spending by default. Setup
explains this, and managers can turn it off.
- Live provider account/model availability still needs the two
credentialed acceptance checks.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code
execution, and browser tools. The exact serving revision and
context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

2026-10-07 15:53:13 -05:00