6 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
3 people	79ce86630a	fix(server): schedule governed review response recovery (#17702) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents, tasks and their external chat responses. > - A completed chat turn can owe a response while an earlier review gate remains pending. > - Periodic recovery revisits that response history even when no work can advance. > - This change uses the existing delivery coordinator and saved retry deadlines. > - Approval, interaction and authority changes wake the affected issue or run after commit. > - The existing presentation owner verifies the durable result and current authority. > - Settled and dormant history becomes quiet without losing future eligible responses. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17696 (merged) and #15625. This is slice 49, now based on master. It owns governed-review response presentation. Accepted responses and pending decision effects keep their existing owners. **What happened?** Native finalization recovery repeatedly inspects committed review responses. Removing the scan without covering approval, interaction, task-policy and authority changes would strand responses that become eligible later. **Expected behavior** Recover an owed response once from existing durable facts. Enforce authority at publication, wake after relevant outer transactions commit, retain real retry deadlines and restart/drain recovery, and stop recurring SQL when no response can advance. **Steps to reproduce** Complete an external chat turn while an earlier completion review remains pending. Block its response behind an approval or interaction, then resolve that blocker. The response must appear once without a periodic scan or resolving the original review gate. ## What Changed - Add a scoped governed-review worker using the existing coordinator, finalizations, decisions and comment receipts. No queue table or transaction wrapper is added. - Keep recovery and publication policy in the native finalizer. Preserve binding, source/session authority, ownership, deadline and deleted-comment fences; match coordinator-before-issue lock ordering. - Notify through actual approval, interaction, OAuth, task-policy and lifecycle producers before their owned writes. Serialize approval resolution with task linking so a concurrent link retains its wake. Nested transactions still settle at outer commit. - Scope ordinary milestones, finalization and coalesced input to their issue/run. Use the explicit company authority boundary for genuine global restoration, including membership changes. Both response workers share this boundary. - Register under maintenance and drain gates, disable the two periodic repair entrances, and retain fresh finalization and explicit recovery. Add the concurrent 0413 comment-receipt index and migration registration; retain five snapshots. - Preserve the producer inventory, source qualifications and earlier failures in the owner audit. Retain a real Photon regression proving routine ownership assertions stay quiet and concurrent authority restoration wakes each worker once. ## Verification - Scoped repair source `2341714720b5c273f0ce011b48345af0ef39227f` passes **2053 distinct cases**: 1703 in 15 complete producer/authority/recovery files, including all 273 governed-response cases and 95 wake-queue adapter cases, plus 350 selected chat cases. Another 1463 chat cases are outside that selection. Thirteen fresh PostgreSQL 17 fixtures migrate through unchanged 0413; the one temporary queue-fixture import restores exactly. All sixteen captured hashes match. - Two actual repeated coarse-hint SQL regressions fail before repair and pass afterward. Actual membership restoration passes before and after. The same assertions and time limits prove dormant work stays quiet and real authority restoration still publishes once. Real coalesced input covers both queues after commit. - Combined source `586f5674cd9798b33cd22437255e0480b5726d20`, including independent master #18129, passes **1297 distinct cases**: 1093 in five complete server files, 185 in five runner files, 14 Node protocol cases and five UI registry cases. This includes the complete 22-case Photon file for both response workers. The external Photon transport is mocked; Paperclip callbacks, transaction fences and observed SQL are real. The earlier and combined case counts are separate, with no cumulative double-counting. - A normal merge retains both complete owned and independent master binary patches. All twelve new-context hashes and sixteen earlier repair hashes match. Three dedicated fresh 0413 fixtures plus the live-event helper's own fresh database use PostgreSQL 17 without source adaptations. Database build, server types/build, boundaries, full-SHA migration order and generated TS/Rust profiles pass. The new inherited Runner vendor inputs rebuild successfully. - Database bytes remain identical to the previously qualified 0413 source. The recorded populated 0412-to0413 upgrade retains all 411 prior receipts and 38 companies, appends one receipt and none on replay; the index is valid and ready. The earlier 2828-case acceptance, CLI journey, setup failures and their repairs retain their recorded source scope in `doc/plans/2026-10-26-governed-review-response-sleep-audit.md`. - Parent #17696 merged with 58 clean checks, Greptile 5/5 and Ponytail 5/5. Its Photon warning was disproved by real callback/SQL evidence and the security check became successful. This PR still requires its own fresh exact-head CI and review gates. No deployed sleep, external alarm or fleet savings claim is made. ## Risks - Notifications use the existing process-local writer contract. Independent SQL writers and uncoordinated replicas are outside its coverage. - Genuine startup and company authority reconstruction remain proportional to the owed backlog. Queries page 100 rows, but discovery accumulates the candidates; this is not a constant-cost global operation. - Current publication authorization, durable binding, ownership and lock ordering remain mandatory. The worker does not resolve the original review gate. - The concurrent index uses existing migration replay handling. Other recovery duties and Cloud sleep eligibility remain separate. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, shell execution and PostgreSQL tests. The runtime does not expose a more specific serving snapshot or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>	2026-10-29 02:54:46 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	4e27a82a42	fix(server): wake approval queue seeding from committed changes (#17510) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work and human decisions for AI-agent companies. > - Automatic decision queues store membership for pending attention sources. > - The old attention maintenance scan created that membership as a side effect. > - Moving approval retention out of the scan also removed approval queue discovery. > - Queue API consumers do not build the attention feed first, so they can miss pending PR approvals. > - This pull request gives approval queue discovery its own worker and commit signals. > - The worker becomes quiet after it saves every missing membership. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17497. Stacked on #17508, following #17505. This is a correctness dependency for the approval retention migration in #17497. Do not treat that migration as complete without this queue-population path. A real PostgreSQL regression found no PR queue when a pending approval had a linked PR work product and the maintenance feed excluded approvals. Related: #13364 proposes pruning stale seeded memberships. This PR preserves existing membership retention and does not implement pruning. #15149 documents the decision-queue APIs. ## What Changed - Add an approval queue worker that selects missing PR-queue memberships from existing durable records. Bound each pass to 100 rows. Continue past failed rows and revisit them on retry. - Reuse the queue service's seed writer through a normalized source contract. Keep queue rules, uniqueness, and audit writes in that service. Keep feed readers compatible. - Wake from committed approval and link changes, issue/company visibility, PR work-product changes and imports, and queue-rule changes. Reuse the existing transaction boundaries. - Recheck approval status under a row lock. Serialize queue-rule changes with the seed writer. Preserve required recovery during drain and shutdown. - Register startup reconstruction under the existing maintenance switch. Leave other attention-source seeding with its current owner until its own migration. - Document the complete producer audit and stack dependency. Add a validated external PostgreSQL option to the existing queue route suite so it runs on hosts without embedded database support. ## Verification Current tested revision: `7948136ef8`. This PR targets master after #17508 merged as `8406047b4e`. Normal ancestry reconciliation preserved the complete tested integration tree, before the review repairs below. Only the original 25 seeding paths differ from master, and database schema/migration metadata is identical. - **56 cases pass in the three complete affected suites:** 28 approval seeding, 6 queue routes and 22 task-watchdog cases. Server typecheck and production build pass. - Three real PostgreSQL retry regressions failed then passed: new matching arrivals cannot postpone a recovered failure indefinitely; successful partial progress resets old failure penalties; an empty cursor rollover does not reset outage backoff. Exact one- and two-second retry assertions, eventual complete recovery and existing capped-backoff/company isolation tests pass. - Three genuinely empty external databases failed before setup repair because tables were missing. Each suite now applies migrations itself. All 55 cases passed on a second set of fresh databases; adding the final rollover guard then passed all 56 cases using those now-migrated fixtures. No production migration or table is added. - The initial expanded fresh run passed 54 cases but failed a cleanup expectation that omitted a required cursor rollover pass. The fixture now permits that explicit continuation while preserving exact deadline and complete-membership assertions. All failure records remain in `doc/idle-approval-queue-seeding.md`. - The prior integrated revision `4e725e2055` passed **522 cases in fifteen complete producer/consumer suites**, plus types/build. Its unchanged consumer code and historical deadlock, cross-company amplification, backoff, gateway integration and setup evidence remain documented; those counts are not relabeled as current acceptance. Commands: server Vitest for approval queue seeding, queue routes and task watchdogs; server typecheck/build. Fresh exact-head Greptile/Ponytail reviews and all CI checks remain required. No full local repository-suite, deployed suspension or cost claim is made. ## Risks - Signals cover the supported in-process service writers. Independent SQL writers and multiple server replicas need a separate notification contract. - The source predicate must stay aligned with unscoped attention maintenance. The first linked issue, company scope, pending status, and execution visibility are tested. A pending approval itself keeps its linked external conversation active. - Existing enabled seed rules can re-add manually removed matching memberships. This preserves the old scan's behavior. Completed or archived membership is not pruned. - Queue seeding and retention are separate owners. Other attention sources still need their own event-driven discovery before the aggregate scan can be retired. - This PR does not extend Cloud wake coverage, relax sleep admission, or claim measured host/database suspension. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and code execution. The exact serving model identifier and context window were not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-27 20:33:01 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	553a004926	fix(server): schedule approval retention from durable deadlines (#17497) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and should become idle when it owes no background work. > - The attention feed archives old pending approvals under the existing 90-day policy. > - The server rebuilds the feed on each maintenance tick, even when approval state has not changed. > - Some approvals have never been read, so retention rows alone cannot define the work. > - Approval records and committed eligibility changes define the real deadline and wake triggers. > - This PR gives approval retention its own deadline worker and reuses the existing retention and archive-delivery contracts. > - The approval lane stops idle scans while other attention sources remain separate migration work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Stacked on #17490. This PR owns approval retention only. Archive notification delivery is already separated in #17475. Other attention-source retention and remaining recurring server duties remain in the stack inventory. The related-PR search found no overlapping approval-retention worker migration. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Automatic archival of old pending approvals from attention. **Current behavior** The shared maintenance tick builds the attention feed for each active company. That query discovers pending approvals and materializes retention records before checking their age. An unchanged or empty approval source is read repeatedly. **Proposed behavior** Reconstruct eligible approvals at startup. Schedule the earliest approval activity timestamp plus 90 days. Wake after committed changes to approvals, links, issue visibility, company activity, or retention controls. Stop scheduling when no eligible approval remains. Archive records through the existing version checks, audit writes, and notification outbox. **Reason and benefit** Idle approval retention should generate no recurring SQL. Unseen approvals still need eventual archival. A stale candidate must not archive an approval that was resubmitted while the worker waited for its source lock. **Breaking changes** None intended. The archive age, eligibility, keep controls, audit, and notification policy remain. Normal attention reads still include approvals. No Cloud sleep blocker is relaxed. ## What Changed - Restrict tool-review signals to their existing terminal transition owners (approve/reject/cancel). Creation/link/revision/resubmit signal retention only. - Coalesce retention notifications under one thirty-second aggregate read budget. Known deadlines still preempt it; no notification or durable deadline means no scan. - Add a bounded approval-retention worker. It uses the shared deadline coordinator and reads pending approvals directly. - Share first-linked-issue ordering and execution visibility through `approval-visibility.ts`, used by both the feed and worker. Preserve actor-specific read filtering and locked archival rechecks. - Materialize unseen approvals on demand inside manual keep/archive/revive transactions. Use the saved activity timestamp and existing versioned state; retain company scoping and rollback on failure. - Add awaited pre-write signals to approval, budget, tool, link, visibility, company, and retention mutation owners. Preserve outer transaction ownership; keep provider calls outside SQL wrappers. - Narrow retention inputs to the source fields the existing service uses. Signal materialization only for inserted or changed state so unchanged reads converge. - Exclude approval collection from the maintenance feed before its query. Other source kinds remain in that sweep. - Add the pending-only approval deadline index with concurrent, idempotent creation. Keep the five newest migration snapshots. - Add real-Postgres lifecycle tests and startup wiring tests. Enable validated external test databases for existing attention and budget suites. - Document producer coverage, quiet conditions, recovery and remaining scope in `doc/idle-approval-retention.md` and the stack ledger. ## Verification Current test revision: `dd844f4e8cbbf1db681a774dc31cd552301bef48`, followed by docs-only `3efda33812`, which received both 5/5 reviews and passing CI. This candidate normally integrates landed Grok `2adcde162e`. All runtime and acceptance-test sources are byte-identical to that tested/reviewed tree; only four independent Runner E2E accounting files and the ledger differ. Migration 0392 and the parent journal prefix are unchanged. Local checks are reused for their unchanged source; fresh final-head CI and reviews are required against master. This remains the approval-retention duty. - **315 cases pass** across eight complete suites: approval retention/service, attention, decision retention, budgets, tool gateway, server startup and scoped deadlines. All 30 real-PostgreSQL lifecycle cases pass. Server production typecheck and build pass. - **Four regressions failed before repair**: unseen young keep/archive/revive returned 404; the manual keep rollback case could not reach its update. They now pass. A failed keep update leaves no retention row or audit; retry succeeds with one audit. - Both linked-issue orders are checked against the feed: hidden first/visible later is excluded; visible first/hidden later remains eligible. The feed and worker use the same owner query, with actor read filtering preserved. - Generated concurrent/idempotent migration `0392_small_frightful_four.sql` adds only the pending approval index. Every historical parent SQL migration and all 390 parent journal entries are unchanged. Five generated snapshots remain (0388–0392). Schema drift, migration safety/numbering and actual fresh apply/replay on five isolated PostgreSQL databases pass. - Existing precision, transaction, drain/resume, failure fairness and shutdown tests remain. Earlier transaction-stub, budget-import, diagnostic-client and CI failures are recorded in the owning audit and stack ledger; later passes do not erase them. - Three additional real regressions failed before the wake repair: ordinary mutations emitted tool-review signals in both resolution cases, and sequential tenant writes caused repeated global reads. Tests now prove terminal approve/reject/cancel signals and one aggregate reconciliation per thirty-second window with a different company's pending approval retained. The aggregate budget is stricter than a separate per-company budget and matches the old default cadence; known deadlines preempt it. - The initial coalescing fixture expected the concrete pending-work hold to clear before reconciliation; it now preserves that hold and measures SQL. The first broad repair passed 313 cases but failed the existing parked-review cancel case. The original cancel producer is restored; all 315 now pass without weakening assertions. At old head `5991f257bb`, security was action-required and Greptile returned service error `8fb1835c-e564-476b-b802-d5be164ea915`. Fresh repaired-head results are required, not assumed. Commands: server Vitest for `approval-retention-work`, `approvals-service`, `attention-service`, `decision-retention-service`, `budgets-service`, `tool-gateway-service`, `server-startup-feedback-export`, `scoped-deadline-work`; server typecheck/build; DB snapshot drift, migration checks and fresh apply/replay. Fresh exact-head Greptile/Ponytail and CI remain merge gates. No full local repository suite or deployed host suspension/cost claim is made. Earlier stack verification below is historical evidence at the explicitly named revisions, not this head's acceptance: Approved delegated Test-tab calls now evaluate caller and target policies in the existing claim transaction. Real HTTP regressions first showed a missing caller charge and shared-limit self-rejection. All 78 connection-management cases and 92 gateway cases now pass on the owning branch, along with server production typechecking. All 78 connection-management cases also pass at combined tip `d25f830db89c1623bff3547bfc68015c1c66e0cf`. The three new cases cover shared charges, separate charges, rollback on denial, duplicate approval, and rejection of a later authorized call. Intermediate counter/identity fixture failures and a reused-database Slack collision are recorded in [the owning audit](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/20557d2c3dd0949c734eaa8095fd78b9b07d7fd5/doc/idle-approved-tool-recovery.md#delegated-test-tab-admission-after-policy-changes). The earlier combined checks below remain evidence for their stated revisions. Current-head CI and review remain required. Earlier published head: `20557d2c3dd0949c734eaa8095fd78b9b07d7fd5`. This remains a single-duty PR stacked on #17490. - Integrated pinned master `8548173fc9efdc0fa07644fb92dcc0b6851a95e5` with normal merges. Every branch passed generated-schema checks and its target-branch migration-order gate. Existing SQL is unchanged; the 25 stack migrations follow master’s new migration. - Duty-specific producer coverage, lifecycle tests, and earlier failure records: [2026-10-24-recurring-server-sleep-stack.md](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/76a49810c7ff403ae7720bef0d453747bd844731/doc/plans/2026-10-24-recurring-server-sleep-stack.md). - Combined tip `51e6cbe67979b55b340ea9f0f434c5b5c682ccd6`: **355 startup/cancellation/recovery/dispatch/preservation tests**, **75 connection-management tests**, and production server typechecking pass. These combined checks do not mean every intermediate PR independently ran the full repository suite. - Real master-to-stack database upgrade passes: **379 unchanged prior migration receipts plus 25 new migrations**, with the gateway responsibility fixture preserved. - Owning-branch checks: 84 runner installation/settlement cases plus runner typechecking and generated TypeScript/Rust profile agreement; 253 GitHub review workflow cases. Stop-attribution and held-worker readiness regressions failed before their fixes. - Failure accounting: the initial combined run passed 349 cases and failed six idle assertions in a reused preservation database containing old cancelled runs. Repeating the combined command with a fresh preservation database passed. Earlier invalid project selection, merge import/type errors, and the interrupted full local suite are not counted as passing checks. - **Latest-head CI and review remain required.** Prior CI findings include GitHub idle observation, route teardown, attention cleanup, touch-picker E2E, workspace health, and voice-cleanup timing; local passes do not erase those failures. No full local repository-suite, deployed sleep, fleet cost, or live Copilot qualification claim is made. ## Risks - Signals cover the application database owner and its child pools. Independent SQL writers and other active processes need an explicit wake integration. Startup reconstructs committed durable state. - The source row lock prevents stale approval-activity archival. It does not add cross-table serializability for concurrent link, visibility, or company-policy changes. - Newly changed eligibility can wait up to the thirty-second notification window, matching the former default maintenance cadence. Saved deadlines still preempt; no new idle polling is added. - Failed records retain recovery debt. Bounded cursor progress lets later rows proceed without dropping failures. - The shared retention transaction now groups materialization and activity-version updates. Existing attention and retention consumers are tested against PostgreSQL. - Kept, archived, resolved or inactive-company approvals can become quiet, but their supported mutations must retain their wake notifications. - The local scheduler cannot wake stopped compute. This PR neither adds approval deadlines to Cloud's external alarm contract nor claims measured host or database suspension. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and code execution. The exact serving model identifier and context window were not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-27 19:23:24 -05:00
DottaandClaude Opus 4.6	f60c1001ec	refactor: rename packages to @paperclipai and CLI binary to paperclipai ... Rename all workspace packages from @paperclip/* to @paperclipai/* and the CLI binary from `paperclip` to `paperclipai` in preparation for npm publishing. Bump CLI version to 0.1.0 and add package metadata (description, keywords, license, repository, files). Update all imports, documentation, user-facing messages, and tests accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-03-03 08:45:26 -06:00
ForgottenandClaude Opus 4.6	11901ae5d8	Implement secrets service with local encryption, redaction, and runtime resolution ... Add AES-256-GCM local encrypted secrets provider with auto-generated master key, stub providers for AWS/GCP/Vault, and a secrets service that normalizes adapter configs (converting sensitive inline values to secret refs in strict mode) and resolves secret refs back to plain values at runtime. Extract redaction utilities from agent routes into shared module. Redact sensitive values in activity logs, config revisions, and approval payloads. Block rollback of revisions containing redacted secrets. Filter hidden issues from list queries. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-02-19 15:43:52 -06:00
ForgottenandClaude Opus 4.6	c09037ffad	Implement agent hiring, approval workflows, config revisions, LLM reflection, and sidebar badges ... Agent management: hire endpoint with permission gates and pending_approval status, config revision tracking with rollback, agent duplicate route, permission CRUD. Block pending_approval agents from auth, heartbeat, and assignments. Approvals: revision request/resubmit flow, approval comments CRUD, issue-approval linking, auto-wake agents on approval decisions with context snapshot. Costs: per-agent breakdown, period filtering (month/week/day/all), cost by agent list endpoint. Adapters: agentConfigurationDoc on all adapters, /llms/agent-configuration.txt reflection routes. Inject PAPERCLIP_APPROVAL_ID, PAPERCLIP_APPROVAL_STATUS, PAPERCLIP_LINKED_ISSUE_IDS into adapter environments. Sidebar badges endpoint for pending approval/inbox counts. Dashboard and company settings extensions. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-02-19 13:02:41 -06:00