Commit Graph
135 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Nicky Leach 8be6d70538 fix(runner): select Claude effort again after a cold session resume (#19708) 2026-11-06 23:10:51 -08:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 9a52a2dfeb fix(native): retry ACPX session.open startup timeouts and give cold Claude a 60 s bound (#19661)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native runs start an ACPX provider through Runner. `session.open`
opens the provider session before any prompt.
> - On a loaded host, a cold ACPX Claude `session.open` took longer than
its 30-second bound. The controller reported
`runner_local_connect_failed: PRP command session.open timed out`.
> - The server classified this as the generic
`native_session_interrupted` with `ambiguous_state`, so the task was
blocked at once. A person had to click Retry, sometimes several times.
In one restart-chaos storm, one task needed three Retry clicks, and on
another task both Retry runs timed out too.
> - The server already has a bounded same-run bootstrap retry for
failures that come before provider work (#18854). It did not recognize
this timeout. The 30-second bound also cut off normal slow startups.
> - This pull request gives cold ACPX Claude a 60-second `session.open`
bound, like Pi and OpenCode (#19487). It also retries a startup
`session.open` timeout automatically on the same run, from clean state.
> - The benefit is that a slow cold start on a busy host completes, or
retries itself, instead of waiting for a person.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18854 (bounded bootstrap retry for definite `session.open`
failures), #19487 (60-second cold OpenCode admission), #19665 (the
bootstrap proof that this change reuses).

**What happened?**

ACPX Claude runs failed with `runner_local_connect_failed: PRP command
session.open timed out` about 35 to 40 seconds after they started. The
coordinator recorded `native_session_interrupted` with `recoveryMode:
"ambiguous_state"` and `providerSessionEstablished: false`. The task was
blocked with a board-owned action. No provider event and no checkpoint
existed. The host 1-minute load was 17 to 44, sometimes with no restart
nearby.

**Expected behavior**

A normal slow cold start completes. A `session.open` that still times
out during runner startup, with no provider event, no checkpoint and no
turn, retries on the same run with backoff. At most two automatic
attempts follow the first. A run where provider work may have started is
never retried automatically.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Run ACPX Claude tasks on a host with a 1-minute load of about 25 or
more.
2. Observe a run fail after about 35 to 40 seconds with `PRP command
session.open timed out`.
3. Observe the task blocked with `ambiguous_state` and a manual Retry.

**Paperclip version or commit**

`master` at `6c7cc2c5d6`.

## What Changed

The bound (evidence below):

- `coldAdmissionTimeoutMs` gives cold ACPX Claude 60 seconds (live
adoption keeps 30 seconds). The runner's Rust sidecar
`session_open_timeout` and the sidecar's provider handshake
(`acpxSessionHandshakeTimeoutMs`) give Claude and Pi 60 seconds too. All
three bounds must agree, or the shortest one fails first. Claude's warm
run attachment uses the same cold budget, like Pi.

The automatic retry:

- `nativeSessionFailureSourceCode` returns
`provider_session_open_timeout` only for exactly `<startup failure
code>: PRP command session.open timed out`. The startup failure codes
are `runner_local_connect_failed`, `runner_direct_wss_failed` and
`runner_ingress_unavailable`. The transport uses them only before
startup completes. After startup the code is
`provider_transport_failed`, which is unchanged.
- `nativeProviderRecoveryEvidence` treats the cause as pre-session.
Durable evidence still decides: a bootstrap retry needs no provider
event (`session.started`, `turn.started` and the others) and no
checkpoint. The existing budget applies: three attempts with backoff of
about 30 seconds, then about 60 seconds. When the budget is used, the
task is blocked with the existing "Provider startup failed on 3 attempts
before any provider work began" action.
- A timeout is indeterminate: the runner can open a provider session
after the controller stops waiting. Live runs showed both leftovers, so
the retry now starts from clean state:
- `prepareNativeSessionOpenTimeoutRetry` (server) runs when the failure
settles. It quarantines a local runner root only when the
restart-recovery proof (`runnerdStateProvesIncompleteBootstrap`, #19665)
shows that no turn began and every recorded process is gone. Any other
root, and any remote runner, stays `ambiguous_state` as before.
- `resetAbandonedBootstrapRecord` (runner ACPX adapter) runs on a fresh
open (no runner-recorded identity). If ACPX has a saved record for the
session key with no messages, no prompt and no events, it is marked
`reset_on_next_ensure`. Claude saves nothing before the first prompt, so
reusing such a record fails the first turn with
`session_resume_required`. A record that holds any conversation is
unchanged.
- A chat retry of an exhausted `provider_session_open_timeout` run is
accepted like the other pre-provider causes.
- `doc/execution-semantics.md` and the Runner README describe the cause
and the bound.

## Verification

**Measured startup distribution** (ACPX Claude
`runner.session.bootstrap` / `runner.session.startup` spans from
restart-chaos run events, 1-minute load 8 to 44):

| Source | Bound | Successful cold bootstraps (s) | Failures |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Earlier storm evidence | 30 s | 2.9, 4.7, 7.4, 8.6, 8.7, 26.2, 27.4,
27.6, 29.2 | startups ended at 34.9 to 40.3 s (the 30 s `session.open`
bound plus spawn and `run.prepare`) |
| This branch, wave s3601 | 60 s | 6.3, 7.8, 8.1, 13.4, 14.4, 22.3,
22.8, 22.9, **37.3** | 0 `session.open` timeouts |
| This branch, wave s3602 | 60 s | 13 samples, p50 10.5, p90 17.9, max
25.7 | 0 `session.open` timeouts |
| This branch, wave s3610 (final head, load 28 to 42) | 60 s | 10.4,
11.3, 11.7, 12.0, 13.3, 14.2, 29.6, **30.4**, **30.9** | 0
`session.open` timeouts |

Under load, successes clustered just under 30 s and failures sat just
above it, so the 30 s bound was cutting the distribution off. With 60 s,
cold starts of 30.4, 30.9 and 37.3 s succeeded that the old bound would
have failed. 60 s is about 1.6 times the largest observed success, and
it matches Pi and OpenCode.

**Live restart-chaos waves** (local, ACPX Claude only, 4 in flight,
`--rc06-masked`, real provider, K1/K2 restarts):

- s3601 (8 tasks, load 19 to 32): 7/8 PASS. No `session.open` timeout.
The one failure is an R3 Retry signature after K1
(`native_restart_recovery_blocked`), not this cause.
- s3602 (8 tasks, load 17 to 39): 8/8 PASS. No `session.open` timeout.
Three Retry clicks were for `native_provider_terminal_failed`
(`provider_turn_lost_on_restore`), a different restart signature.
- Forced timeout, s3609 (4 tasks, B5, K2): a local, uncommitted fault
injection gave every other cold startup a 1.5 s `session.open` deadline.
Result 4/4 PASS. Run 4fe6537a timed out, retried itself on the same run,
and then succeeded through four K2 restarts with no person involved. Run
02799a85 hit the injection three times in a row; the budget stopped it
after attempt 3, and one Retry completed it.
- Before the two clean-state fixes, the same forced wave (s3607 and
s3608) showed the retry reusing leftover state: `turn.start` failed with
`session_resume_required`, and then "ACPX session is not open". Those
runs are the red evidence for the two clean-state fixes.
- Final head, s3610 (8 tasks, K1/K2, no injection, load 28 to 42): **8/8
PASS**, 0 `session.open` timeouts. The one Retry click (t06) was for
`provider_turn_lost_on_restore`, a different restart signature.

**Tests:**

- Red before the fix: `native-startup-retry.integration.test.ts -t
timeout` (embedded PostgreSQL, real executor, real resume claim). The 3
retry cases failed with `native_session_interrupted` /
`ambiguous_state`.
- Green: `native-startup-retry.integration.test.ts` passes 36/36. New
cases:
- for each startup failure code, a timeout retries on the same run with
backoff, keeps the task `in_progress` with an agent-owned
`resume_native_run` wake, and blocks after attempt 3 with a board-owned
action;
- no automatic retry when `session.started` or `turn.started` is
durable, when the code is `provider_transport_failed`, or when another
command timed out;
- a real runner root with an opened session and no turn is quarantined;
a root with a turn command stays `ambiguous_state` and intact; a remote
runner is never prepared.
- `codex-runtime-adapter.test.ts`: 113 pass. New cases: a 45 s delayed
handshake is admitted for Claude and rejected for Codex; a
never-prompted record is reset only on a fresh open; records with
messages, a prompt or events are kept.
- `abandoned-bootstrap-record.test.ts` (real `createAcpRuntime` with
`createRuntimeStore` and a controlled ACP peer that, like Claude, cannot
load a never-prompted session): without the reset, a fresh open reuses
the record and the first turn fails with SESSION_RESUME_REQUIRED after
`session/load`. With the reset, the provider receives `session/new` and
the turn completes.
- `vitest run src/drivers/acpx src/cli` in the runner: 107 files, 1,935
tests pass.
- `native-session-executor.test.ts -t "session.open|startup|bootstrap"`:
144 pass. `runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts -t "cold process admission"`:
4 pass. `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib admission_budget`
passes.
- `npx tsc --noEmit -p server` and the runner `tsc -p
tsconfig.test.json` pass.

## Risks

- **This changes Runner Rust code. The Daytona runner image must be
rebuilt after merge** for remote sandboxes to get the 60-second sidecar
bound. Until then, a remote Claude `session.open` still fails at 30
seconds in the sidecar (as a definite failure, which already retries). A
remote timeout stays operator-owned, because a remote root cannot be
proven clean here.
- A cold ACPX Claude start that hangs now fails after about 60 seconds
instead of 30 seconds.
- A timed-out `session.open` may have created an empty provider session.
No prompt was sent. The retry quarantines that runner root and asks ACPX
for a new session.
- Same-run retries of a fresh-attempt Retry run can still fail with
`isolated_task_directory_binding_mismatch`. This is RC-35 (workspace
re-preparation), which has its own fix in progress.
- No schema or API change. The new error code appears on runs and in run
error codes.

## Model Used

Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, through Claude Code with
tool use (shell, file edits, test execution).

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-06 19:37:11 -06:00
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5 83c6832ccb fix(build): typecheck package, Playwright, and e2e test files in CI (#18839)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Runner, plugin, and Playwright tests verify how those agents run,
connect, and appear in the board
> - Most package tsconfigs exclude tests, and Vitest strips types, so a
type error in those tests fails nothing
> - The tests drifted to 803 real type errors, and some of those errors
hid assertions that checked nothing
> - paperclipai/paperclip#18739 and paperclipai/paperclip#18738 check
the server test tree and four test projects, but not these files
> - This pull request adds a required check for these test files, fixes
every error, and fails CI if a test file is in no program
> - The benefit is that a type error in any test file outside
`server/src` now fails CI

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18739
Refs #18738

**What happened?**

517 test files were in no program that required CI checks. A type error
in those files did not fail CI.

**Expected behavior**

CI fails on a type error in any test file.

**Steps to reproduce**

Add `export const value: number = "text";` to a test file under
`packages/paperclip-runner/src` on master. CI stays green, because
`tsconfig.json` excludes test files and Vitest strips types.

**Measured gap**

Each row is a program with its tests included, on one thread. File and
error counts are for head `7d4b5e907a`. Memory peaks were measured
before the two latest merges of master.

| Group | Test files | Real errors | Peak |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| `paperclip-runner` Node source | 290 | 644 | 1.09 GiB |
| `paperclip-runner` surfaces | 9 | 12 | 0.42 GiB |
| `paperclip-runner` devtools and examples | 14 | 0 | 0.68 GiB |
| `sandbox-providers/kubernetes` | 21 | 65 | 0.44 GiB |
| 8 other sandbox providers and `bridge-template` | 32 | 4 | 0.34 GiB |
| `plugins/sdk` | 22 | 15 | 0.41 GiB |
| `plugin-workspace-diff` | 5 | 0 | 0.37 GiB |
| `plugin-orchestration-smoke-example` | 1 | 1 | 0.15 GiB |
| `kv-demo-mcp-server` | 3 | 0 | 0.13 GiB |
| `packages/db` scripts | 1 | 0 | 1.01 GiB |
| 8 Playwright suites under `tests/` | 52 | 25 | 1.72 GiB |
| `tests/runner-acceptance` | 3 | 0 | 0.58 GiB |
| `tests/e2e`, through layer declarations | 63 | 37 | at most 1.59 GiB |
| `ui` `AttentionInteractionResolver.test.tsx` | 1 | 0 | n/a |
| **Total** | **517** | **803** | |

27 of the 803 errors came from master while this pull request was open.
Each merge of master brought new test code that no check had read.

Errors that were config errors, not real errors:

- One TS2688 for each provider, because the root install does not
install provider dependencies.
- 9 in the Runner Node program (TS7016 and TS6059).
- 2 in `tsconfig.browser.json`. TypeScript 7 removed `baseUrl`, so that
config was invalid.
- 213 in the Playwright suites (`@/*` aliases and Vite types).
- About 60 in `tests/e2e` (import extensions and aliases).

`packages/plugins/create-paperclip-plugin` has no gap. Its tsconfig
excludes its test, but `cli/tsconfig.json` reaches that test through an
import. `server/test-baselines` also has no gap, because
`tests/lifecycle-baseline` reads it.

## What Changed

- Added `scripts/typecheck-test-programs.mjs` and its tests. The
`Typecheck + Release Registry` job runs it. It checks each program in
`PROGRAMS` on one thread.
- The script fails if a tracked `*.test.ts(x)` or `*.spec.ts(x)` file
outside `server/src` is in no program. The compiler file list decides
this, because `include` drops `foo.test.tsx` when `foo.test.ts` exists.
- Added a `tsconfig.test.json` to each uncovered package, and
`tests/tsconfig.playwright.json`.
- Added `tests/e2e` to `PROJECTS` in
`scripts/typecheck-test-projects.mjs`, with a `tsconfig.json` and a
`tsconfig.layers.json`.
- Added `scripts/typecheck-sandbox-providers`. It is a small workspace
that installs provider SDKs from one lockfile. I did not add a lockfile
inside each provider, because
`scripts/build-standalone-public-packages.mjs` uses a frozen install
when one exists, and that changes what a release resolves.
- Corrected `packages/paperclip-runner/tsconfig.browser.json` for
TypeScript 7.
- Set `rootDir` to `..` in
`packages/paperclip-runner/tsconfig.test.json`, because one Runner test
imports from `packages/adapter-utils/src`. The program does not emit
files, so this changes no build output.
- Moved the Kubernetes provider from `vitest ^3.2.4` to `^4.1.8`, the
version the other providers use. Vitest 3 requires `tinypool ^1.1.1`,
which has two critical advisories (GHSA-85c8-ppgw-ccpr and
GHSA-5gmw-xhrv-c9v3). The first patched version is 2.1.2. Its tests have
the same result on both versions: 189 passed, and the same 12
`file-sync` tests failed.
- Moved the Kubernetes provider from `zod ^3.24.2` to `^4.6.6`, and gave
its two `z.record` calls a key schema. This is the only production
change, and it stays in this pull request. See "Production change for
review".
- Renamed `AttentionInteractionResolver.test.ts` to
`AttentionInteractionResolver.replace.test.ts`, so TypeScript reads the
`.test.tsx` beside it.
- Fixed all 803 errors, with changes to test files and test support
only. The fix for `contracts/native-execution.test.ts` is the same as
the fix in paperclipai/paperclip#18739, so those two changes merge
cleanly.
- Updated `doc/DEVELOPING.md`.

This pull request does not edit `server/scripts/typecheck-layers.mjs`.
paperclipai/paperclip#18739 and paperclipai/paperclip#18738 have both
merged, and this branch includes them.

### Production change for review

The new lockfile made dependency review flag `zod@3.25.76` as a
high-severity advisory (GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5). The first patched version
is 4.6.6, so 3.x has no fix. The published Kubernetes plugin uses zod to
validate operator config. The zod 3 source does not compile against zod
4, so a typecheck-only override cannot fix this.

The existing tests do not prove this change, because they also passed
with the invalid one-argument `z.record`. So I parsed 45 inputs with the
same schema on zod 3.25.76 and zod 4.6.7:

| Result | Inputs | Detail |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| Identical | 23 | Includes defaults, valid config, and a `__proto__`
key |
| Same outcome, new error wording | 21 | For example, `Invalid url` is
now `Invalid URL`. `validateConfig` shows this text to operators. |
| Different outcome | 1 | `jobTtlSecondsAfterFinished: 2 ** 60` was
valid and is now rejected. The new limit is `Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER`. |

I did not test this against a real cluster.

The decision is to keep this change in this pull request. Since then,
paperclipai/paperclip#17364 has moved the rest of the repository to zod
4.6.x, so the Kubernetes plugin now matches it.

### Behavior change for review

`reducedMotion` under `use` is not a Playwright option. It had no effect
in 11 configs and 2 `test.use` calls, so those suites ran with
`no-preference`. The options are now under `contextOptions`, so reduced
motion now takes effect. `app-shell-design.spec.ts` asserts a real
transition, so it now asks for `no-preference` itself.

The baseline manifest has `snapshotCount: 0`, so this invalidates no
published baseline. A frozen trial reference PNG can differ.

### Findings

These are product questions. I did not change them, and I did not hide
them with casts:

1. **`PrpEvent` and its schema disagree.** The TypeScript type in
`src/protocol/replay-contract.ts` requires `normalizedSessionId`. The
`required` list in `protocol/schemas/event.schema.json` does not include
it. `validatePrpEvent` accepts events that the type forbids.
2. **`requestCheckboxConfirmation` is stricter than its runtime.** It
uses the output type, so plugin authors must pass `continuationPolicy`
and `allowDeclineReason`, although the schema gives them defaults.
`z.input` would fix this.
3. **`RetainedRunnerdMaintenanceInput.backend.kind` is a free string.**
The quarantine domain comes from `descriptor.kind`, but the release uses
`proof.backend.kind`. If they differ,
`completeRetainedNativeSessionCleanup` returns 0 and the quarantine
stays. The production caller passes `"runner"` today, so this is not a
live bug.
4. **`CodexHarnessSession.close(input?)` is optional, but the contract
requires `{ reason }`.**

These are tests that verified nothing. I corrected them, and they pass:

- `backends/native-instruction-measurement.test.ts` filtered on
`placement === "core"`, which is not a valid placement. It measured an
empty tool list. It now measures 14 tools.
- `drivers/acpx/codex-acpx-driver.test.ts` checked for `usage.updated`,
which is not an event type.
- The `hostFixture()` helper in `drivers/acpx/runtime-host.test.ts`
ignored two overrides, so
`expect(prepareSandbox).not.toHaveBeenCalled()` could not fail.
- `live/live-session.test.ts` set `agent: "pi"` before a spread that
overwrote it.
- `native-distribution-integrity.test.ts` passed an AbortSignal where
`openCommand` expects `{ signal }`.

These are gaps that this pull request does not close:

- **The root lockfile still has some old zod versions.**
paperclipai/paperclip#17364 moved the direct zod dependencies to 4.6.x.
`pnpm-lock.yaml` still resolves `zod@3.25.76`, `4.1.11`, and `4.4.3`,
which are below the patched 4.6.6.
`packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/pi-distribution/package.json` pins
`zod` to `3.25.76`, and some agent SDKs resolve `4.4.3`. Dependency
review does not flag them, because this pull request does not add them.
- **Dead GitHub coverage.** `chat-adapters-ui-providers.spec.ts`
returned early for GitHub, so four later `provider === "github"`
branches never ran. I removed them. They included the private key file
and paste match, and the reconnect flow. Nothing asserts those behaviors
in that spec now.
- **Provider tests do not run in CI.** The root `vitest.config.ts` lists
only Daytona. The other 8 providers, `bridge-template` included, are
typechecked now, but CI does not run their tests.
- **One `packages/db` test never runs.**
`scripts/clean-poisoned-claude-sessions.test.ts` is outside the
`include` of `packages/db/vitest.config.ts`.
- **`plugin-orchestration-smoke-example` does not collect.**
`@paperclipai/shared` is not linked in its `node_modules`. It passes 3
of 3 with an alias.

## Verification

Run these commands:

```sh
node scripts/typecheck-test-programs.mjs --low-memory
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck
node scripts/typecheck-test-projects.mjs --low-memory --reuse-declarations
node --test scripts/typecheck-test-programs.test.mjs
```

Results on macOS (arm64), Node 26.12. CI uses Node 24, and its
`Typecheck + Release Registry` job also passes. At head `7d4b5e907a`,
the test programs, `tests/e2e`, and the script tests pass again with 0
errors. The times and peaks below come from the run before the two
latest merges of master:

| Check | Result |
| --- | --- |
| Test programs, `--low-memory` | Exit 0, 0 errors, 42 seconds, peak
1.78 GiB |
| Server layers, low memory | Exit 0, 0 errors, 38 seconds, peak 3.41
GiB |
| Test projects, including `tests/e2e` | Exit 0, 0 errors, 13 seconds,
peak 1.59 GiB |
| Script tests | 12 passed |
| Injected type error in each of 23 places | Each one failed its program
with TS2322 |
| Coverage check | 0 unchecked files, 10 seconds |

I did not run this in a 4 GiB container. The peaks above are `maximum
resident set size` for the largest single process.

**Runtime check of the fixes.** Types do not prove that a test still
works, so I ran the suites before the two latest merges of master:

| Suite | Result |
| --- | --- |
| Runner, full suite | 4,885 passed, 3 failed, 13 skipped |
| Sandbox providers, 10 packages | 939 passed, 12 failed, 36 skipped |
| Plugin SDK | 200 passed |
| `kv-demo-mcp-server` | 12 passed |
| Renamed UI test and its sibling | 4 passed |

All 15 failures exist without these fixes or come from the local
machine:

- **3 Cursor Cloud timeouts.** `artifact-delivery.test.ts` has 1 and
`cursor-cloud-driver.test.ts` has 2. They time out in a full local run,
and all 133 tests in those files with `codex-security-config.test.ts`
pass when run alone. They fail in the same way with those two files at
their unedited versions.
- **12 Kubernetes `file-sync.test.ts` failures.** They fail in the same
way before and after the fixes. The first failure is that
`/proc/self/fd` does not exist on macOS.

After each of the two latest merges of master, I ran only the Runner
test files that I changed:

| Merge | Result |
| --- | --- |
| `885c249cb9`, 8 files | 534 passed |
| `7d4b5e907a`, 7 files | 672 passed, 16 failed |

The 16 failures are in the two `source-reconciliation` test files. They
fail in the same way with master's unedited versions of those files. 15
of them fail with `ACPX sidecar exited at initialize`, so I think my
local build of the Rust and sidecar binaries is out of date. I did not
rebuild them to check. CI builds them from scratch, and all Runner jobs
pass in CI at `7d4b5e907a`.

**Not run:**

- `tests/e2e` and the 8 Playwright suites need a server, so most of them
have only compile checks. `playwright test --list` loads 308 tests from
the main e2e config.
- `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/kubernetes/test/integration` needs
a cluster, so it has only compile checks.
- I did not run the full `pnpm test:run` or root `pnpm build`. Required
CI runs them.

**Reduced motion.** I ran 6 motion-sensitive Storybook specs in system
Chrome with a temporary config, once with `reduce` and once with
`no-preference`. Both runs had 45 passed and the same 5 failed. So
reduced motion did not change those results. The 5 failures do not
depend on motion. At least one comes from the browser, because system
Chrome prints `oklch(55.6% 0 0)` where the test expects `oklch(0.556 0
0)`. I did not run the other Storybook specs. The `storybook-visual`
label runs that workflow.

## Risks

- **A new lockfile to maintain.** A change to a provider `package.json`
now fails the typecheck job until someone refreshes
`scripts/typecheck-sandbox-providers/pnpm-lock.yaml`. The failure
message gives the command.
- **The job has a new install.** The step downloads provider SDKs, so it
depends on the npm registry. It uses `--frozen-lockfile` and
`--ignore-scripts`.
- **The local install replaces provider `node_modules`.** A contributor
with a standalone provider install must reinstall that provider after
running the script.
- **Reduced motion can change Storybook results.** See "Behavior change
for review". That workflow is not part of required CI.
- **Kubernetes plugin validation changed.** A release of this plugin
ships zod 4. Error wording changes, and very large integers are now
rejected. See "Production change for review".
- **Master moves fast.** Each merge of master brought new test code with
type errors, 27 so far. After this merges, the check reports those
errors in the pull request that adds them.

## Model Used

- Provider: Anthropic Claude, through Claude Code
- Model: Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`)
- Capabilities: tool use, code execution, and subagents for the type
fixes in separate files

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived
details. The app generated the branch name.
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass. See the failures explained
in Verification.
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-06 07:33:59 -08:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 22281d4b3a feat(task-chat): approve harness-proposed plans (Codex plan mode, Claude ExitPlanMode) (#19291)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agents run through the native runner. Codex and Claude Code each
have their own plan mode, and each produces a proposed-plan document.
> - Paperclip already has a planning work mode, an issue `plan`
document, and a `request_confirmation` approval gate for plans.
> - These parts were not connected. The Codex proposed-plan item was
transcript text only. The server path never put Codex into plan mode.
Claude was never put into plan mode, and its ExitPlanMode plan was
dropped. A planning run could close its task as done with no approval.
> - This pull request turns a harness's own proposed plan into the
issue's Plan document and the existing approval gate, for Codex and
Claude.
> - The benefit is that users approve or send back the agent's real plan
from the task chat. Approve resumes the agent. Request changes sends the
reason back to the agent.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19252

**Subsystem affected**
Native runner provider events (Codex and ACPX Claude), the runner Codex
provider (Rust), server native plan synchronization, and the task chat
UI.

**Problem or motivation**
Codex and Claude both produce a proposed-plan document in their native
plan mode. Paperclip did not use it. In live tests on the server path, a
Codex planning run was not in Codex plan mode, saved its own
`implementation-plan` document, and marked the task done without
approval. Claude planning runs were not in Claude plan mode, and the
ExitPlanMode plan text never reached Paperclip.

**Proposed solution**
Add a canonical `plan.proposed` event for a harness's proposed plan. Put
Codex and Claude into their native plan mode for planning runs. Save a
completed proposal as the issue `plan` document with the existing
`request_confirmation` gate. Agents can also propose a plan on a
standard task; the work mode stays standard.

**Alternatives considered**
Reuse `plan.updated`. Its schema is the within-turn checklist and is not
the durable Plan document, so a separate event keeps the two clear.
Stronger prompt text without native plan mode. Live tests showed that
the model kept its own document workflow.

**Roadmap alignment**
This reuses the issue plan document, planning work mode and approval
gate that already exist. It adds one canonical provider event.

## What Changed

- `packages/paperclip-runner/protocol/schemas/*`: add the
`plan.proposed` event (`paperclip.plan.proposed.v1`: `proposalId`,
`status`, `markdown` up to 60k characters, `source`). Regenerate the
schema bundle, validators and manifest.
- `packages/paperclip-runner/src/provider-events.ts`: map the Codex
`plan` item and a `<proposed_plan>` block in a completed Codex message
to `plan.proposed`. Add `claudePlanProposalEvent`.
-
`packages/paperclip-runner/runner/crates/runner-core/src/codex_provider.rs`:
send Codex's native `collaborationMode: plan` on `turn/start` for a
read-only (planning) Codex run. Before this change the server path never
sent it.
- `runner-core/src/acpx_event_payload.rs`: admit `plan.proposed` as ACPX
rich display activity.
- `drivers/acpx/codex-runtime-adapter.ts`: set Claude Code to native
plan mode for a read-only run. Capture Claude's ExitPlanMode plan from
its permission request, record it, and decline the native "Ready to
code?" prompt.
- `drivers/acpx/codex-acpx-driver.ts`, `cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.ts`:
emit the captured proposal as a rich event. Complete that turn instead
of reporting it as cancelled.
- `backends/codex-native-backend.ts`: per-harness plan-mode
instructions, and a short opt-in hint for Claude on standard tasks.
- `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.ts`:
synchronize a completed `plan.proposed` into the `plan` document and a
`request_confirmation` in planning and standard mode. Do not change the
issue status during the run (that revoked the run's lease). The run
finalizer turns the pending confirmation into the review wait.
- `server/src/services/heartbeat-run-summary.ts`: keep a
`<proposed_plan>` block out of the posted reply.
- UI: new `plan_proposal` provider family. The task chat shows a live
"Writing plan" card while a proposal streams and a one-line record when
it completes. Resolved plan reviews keep a receipt ("Approved Plan v1",
"Requested changes to Plan v1: reason"). Plan previews skip section
headings.
- Storybook: `Tasks and conversations/.../Task chat/Proposed plan
approval` shows the journey.
- `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`: describe harness-proposed plan approval.

## Verification

- `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib` (new:
`read_only_codex_turns_use_native_plan_collaboration_mode`)
- `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run
src/provider-events.test.ts
src/drivers/acpx/codex-runtime-adapter.test.ts`
- `cd server && npx vitest run
src/__tests__/native-plan-proposal-sync.test.ts
src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-summary.test.ts`
- `cd ui && npx vitest run
src/components/transcript/native-run-events.test.ts
src/components/task-chat`
- Live test on a local worktree instance with real harnesses:
- Codex (`gpt-5.6-sol`), planning task: Codex asked one question, then
produced a native plan item. The task showed Plan v1 with Approve plan /
Request changes and moved to in review. Approve changed the work mode to
standard. Codex then implemented the plan and its tests passed.
- Codex, Request changes with a reason: Codex woke in planning mode and
produced Plan v2 that includes the change.
- Claude (`claude-opus-5-5`), planning task: Claude was in plan mode.
ExitPlanMode became Plan v1 and the turn completed. Approve resumed
Claude in standard mode, and Claude implemented the plan.
- Claude, standard task that asks for a plan first: Claude stopped
before code changes and asked for plan approval. The work mode stayed
standard.
- Storybook: open `Proposed plan approval` and check each stage.

## Risks

- Codex planning runs now really use Codex plan mode on the server path.
Codex can ask a clarifying question before it proposes. This matches
Codex plan mode.
- Claude planning runs now use Claude plan mode. A declined ExitPlanMode
ends the Claude turn; the runner reports it as completed. Claude's tool
row for that request records a rejection from Claude's side.
- Codex does not stream the proposed plan on the server path yet, so the
live card shows a placeholder until the plan completes.
- A `<proposed_plan>` block in any completed Codex message on a standard
task now asks for approval. This is the documented opt-in path.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with
tool use (shell, file edits, browser). Long context. No extended
thinking mode was used.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-05 20:53:33 +00:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 dd889e6a0b feat: show the assignee's provider usage limit in task properties (#19270)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agents run on the native Runner through the Codex app-server and the
Claude ACP harness
> - Both harnesses report the provider account's rate-limit windows:
Codex sends `account/rateLimits/updated`, and Claude sends its SDK
`rate_limit_event` as `usage_update._meta["_claude/rateLimit"]`
> - Paperclip dropped both signals, so an operator could not see that an
agent was near or past its provider limit
> - This pull request normalizes both signals into one account-scoped
snapshot, keeps the latest snapshot per agent, and shows it as one
"Usage limit" line in the task properties pane
> - The benefit is that an operator sees "5h 78% · resets 15:40" (amber
above 80%, "Limited until …" when the provider refuses work, "using
credits" when a used-up window falls back to credits) next to the
assignee, and can click it for every window

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19246
Refs #19259

**Is your feature request related to a problem?**
Codex and Claude report provider rate-limit windows during a run.
Paperclip dropped them: the Codex notification fell through the Rust
normalizer with no branch, and ACPX dropped Claude's `_meta`. Operators
could not see how close an agent was to its provider limit.

**Describe the solution you'd like**
Store the latest reported windows per agent and show one compact line in
the task properties pane, with a popover that lists every window.

**Describe alternatives you've considered**
A full gauge in the agent list and the run header. A design review chose
one property line with a details popover instead.

## What Changed

- Runner (Rust, the runnerd path): new `provider_rate_limits.rs`. Codex
`account/rateLimits/updated` becomes a `provider.notice.recorded` event
(category `provider.rate_limits`, scope `account`). `CodexProviderState`
merges sparse updates and emits a notice only when the windows change.
ACPX `usage_update` with a sanitized `rateLimit` field also emits the
notice.
- Runner (sidecar): `acpx-runtime-sidecar.ts` forwards only `status`,
`rateLimitType`, `utilization` and `resetsAt` from
`_meta["_claude/rateLimit"]`. This needs the ACPX `_meta` passthrough
from #19259. Until that merges, Claude emits nothing.
- Runner (TypeScript in-process drivers): the same mapping in
`codex-session-notifications.ts` and `codex-acpx-driver.ts` through
`drivers/provider-rate-limits.ts`.
- Shared: `provider-rate-limits.ts` holds the snapshot type, the parser,
the merge, and `summarizeProviderRateLimits` (fullest current window,
expiry by reset time, limited versus using credits).
- Server: `agent-provider-rate-limits.ts` merges each notice into
`agent_runtime_state.state_json.providerRateLimits`, scoped by company
and agent. A session reset keeps the snapshot. No migration.
- UI: `AgentRateLimitPropertyValue` adds a "Usage limit" row under the
assignee in `IssueProperties`. Transcripts treat the notice as run-log
only. A run status event refreshes the assignee's runtime state.
- Storybook: `Tasks and conversations/Task creation and lifecycle/Usage
limit property`.
- Docs: `doc/run-log-events.md` describes the notice and its storage.

## Verification

- `cd packages/paperclip-runner/runner && cargo test -p
paperclip-runner-core --lib rate_limit` and `--test
acpx_provider_events`: sparse Codex merge, dedupe, reached window,
checkpoint round trip, Claude utilization and rejection, notice shape.
- `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run
src/drivers/provider-rate-limits.test.ts src/drivers/codex`
- `cd packages/shared && npx vitest run
src/provider-rate-limits.test.ts`: summary, expiry, limited, using
credits, parse and merge.
- `cd server && npx vitest run
src/__tests__/agent-provider-rate-limits.test.ts`: create and merge,
out-of-order snapshot, company isolation, unrelated notices, session
reset keeps the snapshot.
- `cd ui && npx vitest run src/components/transcript
src/components/issue-properties src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider`
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm check:token-gates` pass.
- Live test on a local worktree instance: a native Codex agent on a
ChatGPT subscription login ran a real task. The runner recorded one
`provider.rate_limits` notice. The server stored it. The task properties
pane showed "7d 100% · using credits" (this account's weekly window was
used up and had credits, and the run succeeded). The transcript showed
no extra row.
- Not verified live: Claude. The local Claude CLI was not signed in, and
the Claude path also needs #19259. The Rust and sidecar paths have
tests.
- Not run locally: the full `pnpm test:run` and `pnpm build`. CI runs
them.

## Risks

- Low risk. The snapshot is display data. It does not hold or start
work. The existing provider-limit wait (#19246) still reads typed run
failures.
- Codex can send a rate-limit update often. The runner emits a notice
only when the windows change, so run-log growth stays small.
- With API-key auth, the harnesses report no windows, so no row appears.
This is the intended result.
- `CodexProviderState` gains two optional serde fields with defaults, so
older checkpoints still load.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, through Claude Code
with tool use (shell, file edits, browser) and extended reasoning.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-05 20:26:51 +00:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 1eff07f29e feat(task-chat): show Claude subagents as a collapsible tree in the runner turn (#19264)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The task chat shows what an agent does in a run. The Paperclip
Runner sends this activity as canonical provider events.
> - Claude runs subagents through its Agent (Task) tool. A run that
delegates showed a confusing burst of unrelated tool calls.
> - The subagent data was already sent, but it was lost: ACPX dropped
`_meta`, the hardened sidecar dropped `rawInput`, and async subagents
report "launched" as the tool result.
> - This pull request maps each Agent call to a canonical `delegation`
event, links each child tool to its subagent, and shows subagents as a
collapsible card or tree.
> - The benefit is that operators can see what each subagent was asked,
what it is doing now, which tools it used, and what it returned.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19252 (the docked plan card used the same canonical-event pattern)
Refs #19259 (ACPX `_meta` passthrough, merged). This PR builds on it.

**What happened?**
When a Claude agent used its Agent tool, the task chat showed one
generic "Task" row and then the subagents' tool calls as flat rows in
the parent turn. The subagent type, prompt, progress and result were not
visible.

**Expected behavior**
Each subagent shows as its own card with its type, description, prompt,
live progress summary, nested tool rows and result. Subagents that start
together show as one tree with status dots.

**Steps to reproduce**
1. Assign a Claude (Paperclip Runner, ACPX) agent a task that asks it to
launch three Explore subagents in parallel.
2. Open the task while the run is live.
3. Before this change, the subagents' tool calls appear flat in the
parent turn.

## What Changed

- **claude-agent-acp patch:** Under the isolated runner context, the
patch turns on the SDK option `agentProgressSummaries`. It forwards each
subagent's `task_progress` summary and its terminal state and summary
onto the spawning tool call as `_meta.claudeCode.subagentProgress` and
`subagentState`. Native subagent sessions stay off, because ACPX cannot
follow child ACP sessions.
- **Runner:** The new file `claude-subagent-lineage.ts` tracks each
Agent/Task call across ACP update deltas. It maps the call to
`delegation.started|updated|completed` events and stamps child tools
with `parentItemId`. An async subagent stays running after its "Async
agent launched" result until its own state settles.
- **Sidecar path:** `acpx-runtime-sidecar.ts` reads the lineage before
it drops `_meta` and `rawInput`. Delegations go out as schema-checked
rich events. Child tools carry `parentToolCallId`, which Rust
(`acpx_event_payload.rs`, `provider_events.rs`) maps to `parentItemId`.
- **Contracts:** The provider-event schema adds optional `prompt` and
`result` to delegation children and optional `parentItemId` to tool
executions. The protocol modules are regenerated. ACPX Claude now
advertises the `delegation` event family.
- **UI:** `native-run-events.ts` keeps delegation payloads and the tool
parent link. `buildTurnTimelineRows` groups adjacent delegations into a
new `subagent_group` row, nests child tool rows (plain and
provider-activity shapes), and hides the spawning call's own tool row.
The new `TaskChatSubagentCard.tsx` renders the card and tree. A new size
token caps the result height.
- **Storybook:** The new story `Tasks and conversations/…/Task
chat/Subagents` has 7 states.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/cli
src/drivers/acpx src/provider-events.test.ts
src/claude-subagent-lineage.test.ts src/protocol` (2069 passed)
- `cargo test --release --locked -p paperclip-runner-core --lib` in
`packages/paperclip-runner/runner` (488 passed, including the new
parent-link test)
- `node --test test/protocol-contract.test.mjs
test/acpx-sidecar-contract.test.mjs
test/acpx-codex-package-contract.test.mjs
test/acpx-rich-extensions-package-contract.test.mjs` (48 passed)
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/components/task-chat src/components/transcript`, including the new
`subagent-timeline.test.ts`
- `check:protocol-types`, `check:protocol-manifest`,
`check:acpx-profiles` and `pnpm check:token-gates` pass.
- **Live test:** A local test-drive instance ran a Claude Opus 5.5 agent
on the Paperclip Runner (hardened sidecar path). The agent ran real
tasks that launched three parallel Explore subagents. The live view
showed "Running 3 subagents · 2 done" with a progress summary. The
settled view showed "Ran 3 subagents", each with its prompt, nested
tools and its own result text.

## Risks

- `agentProgressSummaries` makes Claude Code generate a short progress
summary for each running subagent about every 30 seconds. This adds a
small model cost to runs that delegate.
- The adapter patch reads `task_notification` and terminal
`task_updated` messages. A future claude-agent-acp version can change
these. The patch hunks then fail to apply, and the dependency bump must
update them.
- If a delegation event is lost, child tools stay at the top level as
before. Nothing is hidden without a matching delegation.
- Codex is not changed. Codex subagents need `multi_agent`, which
Paperclip keeps off on purpose. Changing that is a separate policy
decision.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use
(shell, file edits, browser automation). It did the investigation,
implementation, tests and live test.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-05 18:58:35 +00:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 d361f92071 feat(task-chat): show harness status notices as chips, out of the answer (#19267)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agents run through the native runner. The runner turns harness
events from Codex and Claude into canonical provider events, and the
task chat shows them.
> - Harnesses report their own lifecycle: context compaction, retries,
model fallback, and warnings. Paperclip lost or mangled these reports.
> - Claude (claude-agent-acp 0.73) sends compaction, model-fallback and
warning banners as ordinary message text, so "Compacting..." ended up
inside the agent's answer and the issue comment.
> - Codex sends `error` with the text in `error.message` and a
`willRetry` flag. Paperclip read `params.message`, so every Codex error
said "Provider notice", and every retry looked fatal.
> - This pull request keeps these reports out of the answer and shows
them as small status chips between the turn's activity.
> - The benefit is that users can see why an agent paused, retried or
forgot earlier context, and the answer text stays clean.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**
Native runner provider-event mapping (TypeScript driver, ACPX sidecar
and Rust runner-core) and the task chat transcript.

**Problem or motivation**
Claude status banners are mixed into assistant answer text. Codex error
notices lose their message and their retry state. The task chat hid all
of these notices, and settled turns stripped every provider notice.

**Proposed solution**
Classify Claude banners as provider notices at the ACPX boundary. Map
Codex `TurnError` fields and `willRetry` correctly. Render status
notices as inline chips. A retry chip fades after later provider work. A
final error shows the real provider message.

**Alternatives considered**
Patch claude-agent-acp to tag banners in `_meta`. ACPX keeps only
`origin`, `kind` and `source` from `_meta`, and other sessions own the
ACPX `_meta` passthrough work. Banner chunks already have no
`messageId`, and model output always has one, so the classification
needs no adapter patch.

**Roadmap alignment**
This makes existing harness signals visible. It adds no new protocol
schema. It uses the existing `paperclip.provider.notice.v1` `category`
and `details` fields.

## What Changed

- Codex `error` notifications (TypeScript `provider-events.ts` and Rust
`runner-core/src/provider_events.rs`): read `error.message`, map
`willRetry: true` to a recoverable `provider_retry` notice, keep
category `error` for a final error, and add the `CodexErrorInfo` kind,
HTTP status, and the "Reconnecting... n/m" attempt count as notice
details. Retries in one turn share one notice id.
- New `claude-status-banners.ts`: classifies the claude-agent-acp
compaction, model-fallback and SDK informational banners. A chunk must
have no `messageId` and match a known banner exactly.
- ACPX sidecar and the TypeScript ACPX driver emit these banners as
`provider_notice` events instead of answer text. Compaction start and
end share one notice key and carry a `Phase` detail.
- Rust runner-core accepts an optional `noticeKey` and bounded `details`
on ACPX `provider_notice` events.
- UI: new `TaskChatStatusNotice` chip and
`status-notice-presentation.ts`. Status notices become top-level
timeline rows, render as chips wherever protocol cards render, and stay
visible in settled (historical) turns. Generic warnings stay hidden as
before.
- New tokens `--tc-status-notice-warning-*` in `ui/src/index.css`.
- Storybook story `Tasks and conversations/.../Task chat/Status notices`
with eight states.
- `doc/run-log-events.md`: describes the status notice categories.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/components/task-chat src/components/transcript`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run
src/provider-events.test.ts
src/drivers/acpx/claude-status-banners.test.ts
src/drivers/acpx/codex-acpx-driver.test.ts
src/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.test.ts`
- `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib provider_events` and
`--test acpx_provider_events`
- `pnpm check:token-gates`
- Storybook: open
`product-task-chat-status-notices--all-states-gallery`.
- Live test-drive on an isolated worktree instance:
- Codex (gpt-5.6-sol, app-server 0.160): a local pass-through proxy in
front of the real OpenAI API cut the first two response streams. Codex
ran its own retries. The chat showed an amber "Reconnecting" chip live,
then "Recovered after retry" once work continued. With every stream cut,
Codex made five retries and then sent a final error with the real
message.
- Claude (claude-haiku-5-5 through claude-agent-acp 0.73): a long
reading task triggered Claude's own auto-compaction twice. The chat
showed "Compacting context…" live and "Context compacted" afterwards.
The final answer and the issue comment contained no compaction text.
- Not verified live: model fallback and Claude informational banners.
They need a model refusal or a blocking hook. Unit tests cover them.

## Risks

- Low to medium. A Claude model message that is exactly a banner text
and has no `messageId` would become a notice. Model output from
claude-agent-acp always carries a `messageId`.
- Older stored Codex `error` notices (category `error`, not recoverable)
now render as a red row instead of being hidden.
- Claude retries (`api_retry`) are still not visible. claude-agent-acp
reports them only to clients that negotiate session-failure records, and
ACPX drops `_meta`. This is a follow-up that depends on the ACPX `_meta`
passthrough work.
- On a failed Codex turn the thread collapses to a summary, so the red
row does not show there. The existing task banner already shows the real
provider message.
- Some local suites failed on this machine. They do not touch the
changed code: Cursor Cloud staging-custody tests, the ACPX Claude
dependency-graph pin test (a timeout), and the Rust `task_memory`
monitor tests. CI is the reference for these.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use,
code execution and browser automation. Default context window. Extended
reasoning was not enabled.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Refs paperclipai/paperclip#19252 (plan card precedent).

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-05 18:38:57 +00:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 c6996799c4 feat(task-chat): show an inline diff for every file edit (#19269)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The task chat shows what an agent did during a run, including each
tool call
> - Codex and Claude both report the patch for every file edit, but
Paperclip dropped it. Claude's ACP `diff` content was never read. The
Codex `fileChange` item became a generic item with no patch. Codex
`turn/diff/updated` had no native-runner mapping
> - A reviewer could not see what an agent changed without opening the
workspace
> - This pull request carries a bounded patch on each edit call and
shows it in the edit row. Each turn that changed files ends with a
"Changed in this turn" card
> - The benefit is that a reviewer can check every change in the
conversation, with the same view for Codex and Claude

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19252 (precedent: canonical `plan.updated` events as a docked plan
card).

**Subsystem affected**
Paperclip runner (Rust and TypeScript canonical event mapping), PRP
provider-event schema, and the task-chat UI.

**Problem or motivation**
Edit rows say "Edited a file" with no content. Claude Edit/Write `diff`
content is lost after the ACPX sidecar. The Codex native runner drops
`fileChange.changes` and `turn/diff/updated`. The existing
workspace-changes card showed a raw text patch in a dialog, and only on
the in-process Codex path.

**Proposed solution**
Add an optional, bounded `fileChanges` list to
`paperclip.tool.execution.v1`. Fill it from Codex `fileChange` items and
Claude ACP `diff` content. Map Codex `turn/diff/updated` to
`workspace.change.updated` on the native runner. In the UI, show `+N −M`
on each edit row, open a compact colored diff, and end the turn with the
change set.

**Alternatives considered**
A runner-side git diff at turn end. It needs workspace access and extra
cost on every turn. The harness patches are already available. For
Claude, the UI builds the turn card from the edit rows instead of new
per-turn runner state.

## What Changed

- Protocol: optional `fileChanges[]` on `toolExecution` in
`provider-event.schema.json`, with the regenerated schema bundle,
validators and manifest. Paths are workspace-relative. A patch is at
most 32 KiB, and a call has at most 32 files.
- Runner (Rust): new `tool_file_changes.rs`. A Codex `fileChange` item
now also emits `tool.execution.*` with `fileChanges`; the native item
event stays for the recovery and progress projections.
`turn/diff/updated` becomes `workspace.change.updated`.
`normalize_acpx_tool_call` re-validates the sidecar's `fileChanges`.
`normalize_codex_notification_in` resolves absolute paths against the
session cwd.
- Runner (Rust): `has_bounded_rich_display_shape` accepts schema-valid
workspace diffs. Without this change, durable storage cut each patch
string to a 4 KiB preview. Patches use the uncapped secret redactor.
- Runner (TS): new `tool-file-changes.ts`. The ACPX sidecar computes
`fileChanges` from ACP `diff` content with the working directory. The
in-process Codex and ACPX mappers do the same, with an optional
`context` argument.
- UI: new `TaskChatDiffView` (colored rows, hunk labels, a height cap,
"Show N more lines"). Edit rows show counts and the diff. Collapsed
activity groups show edit totals. The workspace card is now "Changed in
this turn", with in-place per-file diffs, and it sits at the end of the
turn. When a harness sends no whole-turn diff (Claude), the card is
built from the edit rows. A change set is marked complete when its run
ends.
- UI: `native-run-events.ts` maps `workspace.change.updated` and
attaches each edit's latest patch to its row (the `diff` transcript
entries now carry `toolUseId`).
- Design tokens: `--diff-add-*`, `--diff-remove-*` and
`--sz-edit-diff-max-h` come from the status icon hues.
- Storybook: `Tasks/Edit diffs` story. Docs: `doc/run-log-events.md`.

## Verification

- Real runs on a local instance (`test-drive`, native runner):
- Codex (`gpt-5.6-sol`): the "Applied a patch" rows show `+9` and `+35
−2` with their diffs. The turn ends with "Changed in this turn", 2
files, `+42`, from `turn/diff/updated`.
- Claude (`claude-opus-5-5` via ACPX): the Write and Edit rows show
`+5`, `+14 −1` and `+9` with correct hunks. The turn card is built from
the edit rows.
- Codex model note: with `gpt-5.4`, pinned Codex 0.160 reports "model
metadata not found". The model then wrote files through the shell, so no
`fileChange` items occurred.
- `pnpm check:token-gates`: all gates clean.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/components/task-chat src/components/transcript src/adapters`: 1073
passed.
- `packages/paperclip-runner`: `vitest run src/provider-events.test.ts
src/tool-file-changes.test.ts src/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.test.ts`
passed. `check:protocol-types` and `check:protocol-manifest` match.
- `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib provider_events
tool_file_changes`: passed. `cargo fmt --check`: clean.
- Storybook: open `Tasks and conversations/…/Tasks/Edit diffs`.

## Risks

- Larger payloads: an edit call can carry up to 96 KiB of patch in Rust,
and the sidecar keeps 48 KiB under its 128 KiB frame. Above the budget,
a file keeps its counts and drops its patch (`diffTruncated`).
- Redaction: each patch goes through the shared secret redactor. Before
this change, a 4 KiB preview cap also applied.
- Claude turn card: it joins each edit's patch in order. It is not a net
diff. For a file the turn created, the counts are net and exact. For an
existing file, the counts are summed over its edits.
- The workspace card moves to the end of the turn. One adapter test
changed to match.
- Local only: four Linux cgroup `task_memory` Rust tests fail on macOS.
They do not touch these modules.

## Model Used

Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with tool use
(shell, browser and file editing) and a long context window.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-05 17:39:07 +00:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 036b1860c3 fix(runner): bind Cursor sidecars to the runner package, not the workspace root (#19255)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The native runner starts ACPX providers through a sidecar. runnerd
tells the sidecar which package owns the provider assets.
> - Cursor, Copilot, Pi, Kimi and Antigravity use pinned native
closures. Their asset guard requires the bound manifest to be the
`package.json` directly inside the bound root.
> - In a local source build, runnerd bound Cursor to the pnpm workspace
root, with the runner manifest one level down. The guard threw before it
checked the Cursor closure.
> - Every Cursor run on a local source instance failed with
`admission_installation`. The sidecar redacts the message, so the cause
was not visible.
> - This pull request gives Cursor the same runner-package authority as
the other native-asset providers.
> - The benefit is that Cursor runs start on local source builds.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**
A `paperclip_runner` agent with `provider: "acpx"` and `acpxAgent:
"cursor"` failed at every start on a local macOS worktree instance. The
run log showed `ACPX sidecar command session.open was rejected
(retryable=false, classification=admission_installation)`.

**Expected behavior**
The run starts, because the pinned Cursor runtime cache matches
`cursor-distributions.json`.

**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run `pnpm dev` from a source checkout, with the Cursor runtime set up
in `~/.paperclip/runtimes/cursor`.
2. Create a native runner agent with `acpxAgent: "cursor"` and a bound
`CURSOR_AUTH_TOKEN`.
3. Start a run. It fails at `session.open`.

**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at 26391707fb.

**Agent adapter(s) involved**
Cursor (native runner, ACPX).

**Relevant logs or output**
`failed to start ACPX provider: ACPX sidecar command session.open was
rejected (retryable=false, classification=admission_installation)`

**Additional context**
`acpxProviderPackageAuthority` sent Cursor through the JS-provider
branch. That branch binds `PAPERCLIP_ACPX_PROVIDER_PACKAGE_ROOT` to the
workspace dependency root. `resolveRunnerProviderAssetsRoot` then threw
`Runner provider manifest is outside its package root`. With the same
environment, a direct call to the built verifier reproduces that error.

## What Changed

- Add one `NATIVE_ASSET_ACPX_AGENTS` set (`cursor`, `copilot`, `pi`,
`kimi`, `antigravity`) in `runnerd-codex-transport.ts`.
- The runner-package branch uses the set. This adds Cursor.
- The vendored source-server branch uses the same set. This adds Cursor,
Copilot and Kimi, which had the same gap there.
- Tests cover Cursor and Kimi in the source, scoped-npm and deployment
layouts. Tests also cover all five providers in the vendored
source-server layout.

## Verification

- `npx vitest run src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts -t "package
authority|vendored source server"` in `packages/paperclip-runner`: 18
pass.
- Red check: on the old code, four new Cursor cases fail.
- Full `runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts`: the same 56 tests fail before
and after this change. They fail because the fresh worktree has no built
`runner/target/debug/paperclip-runnerd`. The change adds no new
failures.
- Live: on a worktree instance with this fix, a Cursor run
(`gpt-5.6-luna`) started and succeeded. It sent five `plan.updated`
events, and the task chat showed the plan card.
- Manual: I drove the built `acpx-runtime-sidecar.cjs` with `initialize`
and `session.open` for Cursor. With the runner-package binding,
installation admission passes. With the workspace-root binding, the
verifier throws the manifest error.

## Risks

- Low risk. The change only selects the package root for providers whose
asset resolver already rejected the workspace root. Those providers
never read JS dependencies from the bound root.
- Published npm server bundles and provider packs are unchanged. Their
sidecar is not inside the owner package, or they already bind the server
package.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use and
code execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-05 11:04:13 -06:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 8227259d86 feat(task-chat): show the agent's native plan as a task list above the composer (#19252)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agents run through the native runner. The runner turns each
harness's native plan into a canonical `plan.updated` event.
> - The task chat did not show these plans. A small "Step 2 / 5" pill
showed the checklist only on hover, and in live runs it received no plan
data.
> - Live tests found three breaks. The UI flattened `plan.updated` into
tool rows. Headless Claude Code hides its task tools from current
models. Codex ships its `update_plan` tool disabled.
> - This pull request fixes the three breaks and replaces the pill with
a docked plan card above the composer.
> - The benefit is that users see what the agent finished, what it does
now, and what comes next. The view is the same for Claude, Codex, Grok
and Copilot.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**
Task chat UI (turn status island), native runner ACPX launch environment
for Claude, and native runner Codex app-server launch arguments.

**Problem or motivation**
Harnesses report native plans, and the runner records them as
`plan.updated` events. Users do not see them. The live transcript
builder converts `plan.updated` into generic tool rows, so the plan
steps are lost. Claude Code in headless mode does not offer
TaskCreate/TaskUpdate for current models, so Claude never makes a plan.
Codex 0.160 has `update_plan` disabled by default, so Codex writes its
checklist into a Paperclip document instead.

**Proposed solution**
Keep the full plan snapshot in the live transcript. Enable the Claude
task tools with `CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_TODO_TOOLS=1` in the ACPX launch
environment. Enable the Codex plan tool with
`tools.update_plan.enabled=true`. Show the plan as a docked card with
clear rules for when it shows, collapses and hides.

**Alternatives considered**
Show the plan only in the hover popover (the old behavior). Users did
not find it. Write the plan into the issue Plan document. That mixes a
per-turn checklist with the reviewed planning document.

**Roadmap alignment**
This makes existing native runner plan events visible. It adds no new
protocol or data model.

**Additional context**
Grok and Copilot needed no harness change. Cursor could not start in a
local worktree instance (an unrelated startup admission problem), so
this PR does not verify Cursor.

## What Changed

- `ui/src/components/transcript/native-run-events.ts`: keep
`plan.updated` as `provider_activity` with family `plan` and the full
payload, not as a tool row.
- `ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatTurnStatusIsland.tsx`: replace
the hover pill with a docked plan card. It shows done, current, upcoming
and blocked steps, a progress bar and file-change totals.
- Visibility rules: hidden with no steps and after the run ends;
collapses when all steps are done; header only for one-step plans and
while a question or approval is pending; window around the current step
for plans over 7 steps; collapsed by default on mobile.
- `ui/src/components/TaskChatThread.tsx`: pass `defaultCollapsed`
(mobile) and `compact` (pending runtime request), and reset the card per
run.
- `ui/src/components/task-chat/transcript-adapter.ts`: keep the `failed`
step status.
- `packages/paperclip-runner/src/drivers/acpx/environment.ts`: set
`CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_TODO_TOOLS=1` for Claude launches. A host value
cannot turn it off.
-
`packages/paperclip-runner/src/drivers/codex/codex-security-config.ts`:
add `-c tools.update_plan.enabled=true` before the policy overrides and
the `app-server` subcommand.
- `ui/storybook/stories/tasks/task-chat-agent-plan.stories.tsx`: new
story for each state. It uses the production composer dock, composer and
question takeover.
- Tests for all of the above. `ui/src/index.css` replaces the unused
popover size token with a list max-height token.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/components/transcript src/components/task-chat
src/components/TaskChatThread.test.tsx src/adapters/paperclip-runner`
(1345 tests pass).
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run
src/drivers/acpx/environment.test.ts src/drivers/codex` (pass).
- UI and runner typecheck are clean. `pnpm check:token-gates` is clean.
- Storybook: open "Tasks and conversations / … / Task chat / Agent
plan". The "All States Gallery" story shows every state. "Live Run
Simulation" animates a run.
- Live test on a local worktree instance with real API keys: a
multi-step task for each harness. The card showed and updated during the
run for Claude (Opus 5.5), Codex (gpt-5.6-sol), Grok (grok-4.7) and
Copilot (gpt-5.6-luna). For Claude the card collapsed when all steps
were done and hid after the run ended.
- Codex probe: `codex exec` with the pinned 0.160 binary reports no
`update_plan` tool by default and reports the tool with `-c
tools.update_plan.enabled=true`.

## Risks

- Claude and Codex now get their plan tools. Agents can spend a few
tokens on plan updates. The tools are standard harness features.
- The Codex flag goes before the web-search and project-instruction
policy overrides, so the existing policy tail check still holds.
- Runs that finish fast show the card only briefly. This is the intended
hide rule.
- Cursor plan display is not verified.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use
(shell, file edit, browser automation) and extended reasoning.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-05 09:09:39 -06:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 e37ab23dbc fix: hold an agent's new work while its provider usage limit is active (#19246)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Routine-driven agents run on the native Runner through ACP harnesses
such as Claude
> - When the agent's provider account runs out of allowance, every new
wake for that agent fails the same way
> - The ACP harness reported the exhausted allowance as a generic
"terminal limit failure" with an `unknown` category, so Paperclip could
not tell it from a context or turn limit
> - Paperclip recorded a reset time only for the failing run's own
startup retry; other wakes of the same agent kept dispatching, each
spent about two minutes on workspace setup, and then failed
> - This pull request classifies the limit, keeps its reset time, and
holds the agent's new work until that reset
> - The benefit is that a limited agent stops burning runs, shows a
clear "waiting for usage limit reset" state with a time, and resumes its
queued work after the reset

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #13148
Refs #13379

**What happened?**
A routine-driven Claude agent on the native Runner failed 29 times in
about 15 hours. 20 runs failed with `native_provider_terminal_failed`
and "ACP agent reported a terminal limit failure." The recorded provider
failure had category `unknown`. 6 runs failed with
`provider_session_open_rejected`. Their `session.open` result is
`command_execution_failed` with classification `provider_rate_limit`,
and the provider failure is HTTP 429 `rate_limit` ("would exceed your
account's rate limit"). The startup retry of one such run recorded a
cooldown until one hour later. A new wake for a different task of the
same agent dispatched 16 minutes later, spent two minutes on workspace
setup, and failed with the same 429. Separately, 4 runs failed with
"Project authentication conflicts with this agent's managed AI
connection". That message did not say which file or setting conflicted.
The same message was also shown when the check could not finish.

**What did you expect?**
A provider usage limit is classified distinctly. Paperclip records the
reset time when the provider reports one. New work for that agent waits
for the reset with a visible reason. Queued work resumes after the
reset, and no doomed run starts. A configuration conflict is reported
only when one is found, and the message names the file to fix.

**Steps to reproduce**
1. Use a native Runner agent with a Claude ACP harness whose account is
rate limited or out of usage.
2. Let a routine or assignment wake the agent on several tasks.
3. See each run fail with a generic terminal limit failure or a
`session.open` rejection, and see new runs keep starting.

## What Changed

- Runner: The ACPX turn now receives the typed AIR session failure
(`onTerminalSessionFailure`) through the runtime host and the ACPX port.
The sidecar adds the provider's title to the provider failure message.
Only a rate-limit or quota title becomes `rate_limit` or
`quota_exhausted`. Context, turn and configured budget limits stay
`unknown`. The failure details stay private.
- Server: A native `turn.failed` with a `rate_limit` or
`quota_exhausted` provider failure is now `native_provider_usage_limit`,
the same code as the Codex usage-limit terminal.
- Server: `agentProviderLimitCooldown` (extracted from the startup
retry) also reads a reset clock in the provider's wording, such as
"resets 2am (UTC)". The clock parser moved from the recovery service to
`provider-quota-reset.ts` without changes.
- Server: New `heartbeat/provider-limit-wait.ts`. Before any workspace
or provider work, a queued run for an agent with an active provider
limit is cancelled as `provider_limit_wait`. The run records the reset
time, whether the provider reported it, the category and the run that
reported the limit. Paperclip schedules one retry of the same wake at
the reset through the existing AI connection wait lane. That lane does
not consume the failure retry budget. Manual runs, recovering runs,
conversation turns and pool-routed connections are not held.
- Server: The execution projection shows "Waiting for usage limit reset"
with the reset time and the next step.
- Server: Only a found project authentication conflict is a
configuration failure. Its message names the project file and the
settings to remove. A check that cannot finish (timeout or another exit
code) is now an ordinary failure, not a configuration conflict.
- Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the agent-level limit
wait.

## Verification

Red before the fix, green after:
- `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-provider-limit-wait.test.ts`: An
automation wake after a 429 `session.open` rejection dispatched the
adapter before the fix. Now the run is cancelled as
`provider_limit_wait` and a scheduled retry exists at the reset. After
the reset passes, the retry is promoted and the work succeeds. A manual
run, a later success, expired evidence and an unclassified terminal
still dispatch.
- `native-startup-retry.integration.test.ts`: "reads the reset clock
from an ACP terminal limit failure's provider wording" (it fell back to
one hour before).
- `native-session-executor.test.ts`: An ACP `turn.failed` with a typed
`quota_exhausted` or `rate_limit` failure is a usage-limit terminal;
`unknown` is not.
- `packages/paperclip-runner/src/drivers/provider-failure.test.ts`: A
typed AIR limit title is kept and classified; context, turn and budget
limits are not; details do not leak.
- `execution-projection.test.ts`, `ai-connections.test.ts`: The wait
label, and conflict versus unfinished check.
- Safety cases: `runtime-host.test.ts` and
`codex-runtime-adapter.test.ts` forward the callback. The existing
startup retry, provider capacity, recovery classification, legacy
reconciliation, retry scheduling and execution configuration suites
pass.

Commands:
- `cd server && npx vitest run
src/__tests__/heartbeat-provider-limit-wait.test.ts
src/__tests__/ai-connections.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/
src/services/recovery/ src/services/execution-projection.test.ts
src/services/legacy-execution-recovery.test.ts
src/__tests__/heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts
src/__tests__/heartbeat-execution-configuration.test.ts`
- `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run
src/drivers/provider-failure.test.ts
src/drivers/acpx/runtime-host.test.ts
src/drivers/acpx/codex-runtime-adapter.test.ts
src/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.test.ts`
- `tsc --noEmit` for server and paperclip-runner; the ACPX sidecar and
provider-failure contract checks pass.

I did not run a live provider limit on staging. The live evidence is the
staging run records for the affected agent, which I read only.

## Risks

- The limit evidence is per agent, not per account. If the board changes
the agent's AI connection, automatic wakes can still wait until the old
reset (at most one hour when no reset was reported, and at most one
day). A manual run is not held, and one successful run clears the
evidence.
- A new wake that arrives during a limit is now cancelled and retried at
the reset, instead of failing. The task stays in its status, and the run
shows the reset time.
- The Runner change takes effect when the provider pack is rebuilt and
deployed. Until then, the server still holds new work using the existing
`rate_limit` evidence from `session.open` rejections.
- A turn terminal with a typed rate limit or quota is now
`native_provider_usage_limit` instead of
`native_provider_terminal_failed`. Both are terminal and board-owned.
The recovery text now asks the board to restore provider usage capacity.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude
Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser reads of staging run
records) and extended reasoning.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-05 08:57:55 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 612d9931a6 Support per-turn Runner sessions on ephemeral web servers (#18932)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The web server controls native Runner sessions in remote sandboxes.
> - An ephemeral web server must recover without its previous local
filesystem.
> - The existing admission rule accepts warm sessions. Managed Claude,
Grok, and OpenCode sessions resolve to per-turn execution.
> - Per-turn execution also needs durable provider-session bytes after
the sandbox is retired.
> - This pull request adds encrypted backup publication and removes the
warm-only admission rule.
> - Both lifecycle modes can use the existing native ownership and
checkpoint contracts during a web deployment.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #18518, #18529, #18826, #18835, #18841, #18864, #18887.

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

Native Runner execution on web servers with
`PAPERCLIP_EPHEMERAL_SERVER=true`.

**Current behavior**

The admission rule requires a warm Runner lifecycle. Managed provider
credentials can resolve an agent to per-turn execution, so enabling the
ephemeral deployment profile blocks those turns. A database controller
checkpoint does not preserve provider files after the old web home and
per-turn sandbox are removed.

**Proposed behavior**

Admit native execution in either resolved lifecycle. Keep provider and
credential choices unchanged. Publish encrypted provider state to shared
storage before sandbox cleanup. Restore it from a fresh web home for the
next turn. Use the existing controller lease and generation checks for
active takeover.

**Reason and benefit**

Operators can remove the web server volume without excluding per-turn
providers or forcing managed accounts into warm sessions. New native
Daytona profiles automatically enter both rolling-deployment
qualification lanes.

**Breaking changes**

The additive migration creates a backup publication ledger. Existing
volume-backed local-disk installations retain their local backup path.
S3 installations publish encrypted backups and require a stable secrets
master key. Existing-volume enrollment must import surviving session
data before detaching the volume.

## What Changed

- Admit native Runner execution independently of its warm or per-turn
lifecycle. Keep host-owned legacy execution excluded from ephemeral
deployments.
- Store private provider state as encrypted objects. Journal uploads
before I/O, read them back, and fence publication against the current
native owner. Keep the previous published backup when storage or
ownership checks fail.
- Restore exact provider bytes into a private cache. Require an exact
durable backup before sandbox cleanup. Extend the existing bounded
retention pass to retire stored objects without adding idle polling.
- Import selected legacy controller and provider state in the existing
offline maintenance process. Preserve queued work, task pointers,
pending recovery, and original files. Prefer canonical database
checkpoints.
- Preserve already-failed legacy controllers with missing original
artifact proof as encrypted archives. These archives do not become
execution authority. Successful retained sessions still require proof.
Report archival and executable imports separately.
- Verify unmanaged Grok API keys through the existing xAI account
validator. The live test exposed a readiness gap that kept remote Grok
agents paused after platform checks. Preserve failed credentials and the
separate runtime warning.
- Ingest Grok whole-prompt usage at the owning ACP boundary. Bind the
receipt to the exact outbound request/session; reject replay, conflicts,
and incomplete authority. Separate turn cost from cumulative session
cost in the sidecar schema and Rust normalization. Preserve managed
billing identity and identify direct xAI API credentials.
- Preserve published workspace directory names across cold allocations,
including destroyed-allocation cleanup. Keep unpublished epoch/lease
directories isolated and refuse to overwrite an occupied preparation.
This fixes the cold-session identity regression exposed by #18922.
- Increase bounded checkpoint-header inspection to 1 MiB. Retain the
aggregate inspection limit.
- Register all nine native Daytona profiles in per-turn and warm
rolling-deployment suites. Delete the entire departing server home,
exercise ordinary reads and writes, require active ownership transfer,
then check a later turn on another fresh server. Permit only exact
notification replay after reconnect.

Ownership stays with the existing modules: Runner validates its protocol
state; Core validates run scope and controller ownership; storage owns
object I/O; the maintenance process owns offline conversion; the E2E
wrapper owns process replacement and probes. No provider protocol is
added to the shared admission rule. Grok receipt parsing stays in its
provider module. The shared sidecar gains an explicit cost basis because
its existing price field means session-cumulative spend, while Grok
reports prompt totals. Existing consumers retain cumulative behavior
when the new field is absent.

## Verification

- Focused native admission, archive validation, publication fencing,
cleanup, readiness, legacy import, and E2E observer tests pass. Real
PostgreSQL cases verify that queued intent and historical recovery rows
stay unchanged.
- Full typecheck and build pass on the rebased branch. The review
follow-up passes server typecheck, 29 focused
PostgreSQL/archive/readiness tests, and module-boundary checks. Revision
fb8d39a7a1 reached 55 successful CI checks and Greptile 5/5 with no
unresolved threads. The Grok follow-up passes Runner/server typechecks,
238 ACP runtime/projection/usage tests, 16 sidecar-schema tests, the
Rust cost regression, and Core billing regression. The e9aae9cf revision
passed all 57 successful checks, with 5 skips and 2 neutral checks, and
exact-head Greptile 5/5. The latest 9cbec30a4f follow-up changes only
E2E catalog/admission controls; its 291 affected tests pass, all 57
check contexts succeeded (5 skips, 2 neutral), and exact-head Greptile
is 5/5 with no open review threads.
- Migration numbering and safety checks pass.
- A local real PostgreSQL/S3 roundtrip preserved 2,870,101,591 payload
bytes across 89,100 archive entries after deleting the source directory.
Restored SHA-256 matched; upload/readback took 56.5 seconds, restore
74.8 seconds, process peak RSS was 1.40 GB, and all fixture resources
were removed.
- Archives preserve contained relative links, reject link
chains/traversal, and enforce independent byte/entry/object limits.
Offline verification streams hashes. Orphaned deleted-run backups stay
on the original volume. Obsolete object retention preserves the selected
backup, live lease references, and pending uploads with owners.
- Isolated API-key Codex deployment: original active runner/session
transferred to the replacement and committed. All 567 reads, 57 writes,
and 57 readbacks succeeded. A second replacement completed a
same-session continuation with all 287 reads and 29 writes succeeding.
The strict cell failed two agent-authored shell commands; this result is
retained as failed.
- Isolated API-key Claude deployment: original active runner/session
transferred and committed. All 584 reads, 59 writes, and 59 readbacks
succeeded. A second replacement completed a same-provider-session
continuation, with 211 reads and 22 writes succeeding. The strict cell
failed an initial completion call that omitted a registered attachment
citation; the agent corrected it. This result is retained as failed.
- Isolated API-key OpenCode deployment: the same active runner/session
transferred and committed. All 481 reads, 49 writes, and 49 readbacks
succeeded. A second replacement retained the provider session and
completed useful work, with 156 reads and 16 writes succeeding. The
strict cell failed agent tool calls: a denied external-directory write,
malformed artifact hashes, and a second completion after the first
result was committed. There was one submitted/completed turn and one
committed result; reconnect notification replay was identical. This
result is retained as failed.
- Grok's real first turn now completes with settled usage and provider
cost ($0.41397); the next turn is admitted normally. That attempt then
exposed a shared workspace-path identity regression before deployment.
Three cold-restore cases reproduced it before the fix; 106
workspace/transport tests and four focused cold-restore cases pass
afterward, including destroyed allocation and occupied-directory
preservation. Server typecheck and build pass. At b5b0dbb03f both
controller switches passed the read/write probe without failure, and the
active runner retained its process while the controller generation
advanced. The third turn exposed an invalid reasoning-token subset
check; ad07e681ba fixes it with the actual receipt regression. Two later
live attempts failed with an upstream Grok rate limit before deployment.
A tiny preflight prompt succeeded before the second attempt, but the
full workload was still rate-limited. The final live gate remains
incomplete. No accounting or identity guard was bypassed. Earlier failed
attempts and their exact resource-cleanup receipts remain recorded.
- Earlier Codex/Claude/OpenCode receipts predate #18922; they establish
their tested revisions. Current-head live qualification remains pending;
#18943 separately preserves pre-enrollment logical/provider workspace
addresses and adds actual legacy migration proof. Its first Codex
migration attempt stopped safely at skill-version verification.
- Earlier attempts remain recorded: missing local provider-pack setup
blocked one Claude launch, and the observer rejected identical reconnect
replay in another. Setup and the observer were corrected before the
latest run.
- Named staging enrollment has not started. Its serving revision and
post-deployment journeys remain separate delivery gates.

- Broader E2E harness validation exposed deployment-catalog and
installed-lane coverage drift; the affected 291 controls now pass.
Twelve other failures reproduce on unchanged base 1a39dea9aa. They
concern cleanup call expectations, dated operating-overhead fixtures, a
Pi profile-version expectation and workflow-security expectations. No
baseline failure is reported as passing.

## Risks

- Provider archives can contain credentials. Objects use authenticated
encryption with scoped associated data and a wrapped data key. The
original stable master key remains required.
- Storage failure prevents publication and sandbox cleanup. Operators
must keep shared storage available and preserve the previous volume
during enrollment.
- Legacy state without verified identity cannot become executable
recovery authority. Archival preserves evidence and existing failures;
it does not recover already-lost provider files or clear blocked tasks.
- Local overlap probes establish the tested application behavior. They
do not establish Railway routing behavior or live managed-subscription
qualification.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, code execution,
and live integration tests. The exact runtime variant and context-window
size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-04 02:12:51 -06:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 9fb06afbfa fix(runner): explain ACPX session-start failures and name typed causes (#18847)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native Runner starts ACP providers (Claude, Codex, Pi and others)
through the ACPX sidecar. `session.open` starts the provider session.
> - When the provider session does not start, Runner reports
`classification=session_ensure_failed`. If the provider failed with a
plain error and not with an ACP `RequestError`, no provider cause
crosses the sidecar. Then the run error, the run events and the run log
do not say why the session did not start.
> - A provider can also type the failure, for example with ACP's
authentication-required code. Runner reported that failure with the same
generic classification. The server could not tell a limit or a sign-in
failure at session start from other startup failures.
> - On one instance, a Claude agent hit its provider usage limit. The
first run failed in the turn with a typed limit failure. Each later run
for many hours failed at `session.open` with only
`session_ensure_failed`. Operators could only guess the cause from the
timing.
> - This pull request keeps a redacted, bounded cause for every session
ensure rejection. It names a typed provider category in the closed
classification.
> - The benefit: an operator can read why a session did not start, and a
later recovery change can treat a typed startup failure by its category.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18622, which added the `ProviderFailure` cause for startup and
turn failures. This change closes the remaining startup gaps. Refs
#17543, which is a related open change to the same classifier. It keeps
the JSON-RPC code range as a closed code. The two changes edit the same
lines, so the second one to merge needs a small rebase.

**What happened?**

A native ACPX run failed before its first prompt with `ACPX sidecar
command session.open was rejected (retryable=false,
classification=session_ensure_failed)`. When the ensure rejection was
not an ACP `RequestError`, the run had no other cause data. When the
provider typed the failure (for example ACP `-32000` "Authentication
required"), the classification stayed the same generic value.

**Expected behavior**

Every session ensure rejection keeps a redacted provider cause that an
operator can read on the run. A typed provider failure keeps its
category in the cause and in the closed classification. Provider text
never goes into the closed error text.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Make `runtime.ensureSession` reject with a plain `Error`, or with an
ACP error that has code `-32000`.
2. Open a qualified ACPX runtime through the sidecar.
3. Before this change, the plain error has no `providerFailure`, and the
`-32000` error has category `unknown` and
`classification=session_ensure_failed`.

**Paperclip version or commit**

`master` at `e0276e0166c`.

## What Changed

- `acpxProviderFailure` reads ACP's reserved authentication-required
code (`-32000`) as category `authentication`. It also reads the
`errorKind` that Claude ACP puts in ACP error data (`rate_limit`,
`billing_error`, `authentication_failed`, `overloaded` and others). The
category table is now a `Map`, so an `errorKind` such as `constructor`
cannot select an inherited object key.
- The session ensure path in `codex-runtime-adapter.ts` keeps a cause
for every rejection. A rejection without an ACP error keeps its own
message, redacted with the launch environment and the existing
credential patterns, with category `unknown`. An abort reason is Runner
cancellation, so it does not become a provider cause. A non-`Error`
rejection now keeps its cause on the wrapper error.
- `acpx_sidecar_transport.rs`: for `ACPX_SESSION_ENSURE_FAILED`, a
schema-valid cause with a typed category gives
`classification=provider_<category>` (for example
`provider_quota_exhausted`, `provider_rate_limit`,
`provider_authentication`). An untyped or invalid cause keeps
`session_ensure_failed`. Only the validated enum value is used. The
cause's text never goes into the error string.
- `runnerd-codex-transport.ts`: when a command result has a provider
cause, the reported error now keeps Runner's closed ACPX rejection text,
so the classification stays in the run error. Before, it changed that
text to "Provider request failed". Any other message (for example a
Codex `RPC failed: ...` message) still gets the generic text. Provider
text still travels only in `providerFailure`.
- The credential-free Pi probe (`pi-closed-startup.test.mjs`,
`scripts/pi-public-install-probe.mjs`) now expects
`provider_authentication`. Pi reports its missing credential with ACP's
authentication-required error.
- Docs: `doc/run-log-events.md` and
`doc/architecture/runner-pi-capabilities.md`.

**What the Claude ACP agent returns at session start**
(`@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp` 0.73.0 with the repository
patch, and the ACPX 0.13.1 patch):

- `newSession` and `loadSession` call `createSession`. It throws
`RequestError.authRequired` (`-32000`) only for a claude.ai subscription
when gateway auth is hidden. It throws `invalidParams` for a bad `cwd`
and `resourceNotFound` for a missing resumed session.
- Any other error, for example a failed SDK `initializationResult()`,
becomes a generic `-32603 Internal error`. The ACP SDK puts the raw
message in `data.details`, or the parsed JSON body in `data` when the
message is JSON.
- The typed AIR `sessionFailure` (category `limit`, `access` and others)
is sent only on prompt responses and on `session_info_update`
notifications. `loadSession` history replay also sends one for each
earlier usage-limit message, but that notification does not show whether
the limit is still active. The `errorKind` data is attached only by the
prompt loop.
- Thus a usage limit at session start has no typed signal on the ACP
error. The cause keeps the provider's message, and the existing `API
error: NNN` status parse can type it. This change does not add more
free-text matching.

**Shape for a recovery consumer:** the server reads the cause with
`providerFailureFromError(error)`, as it does now. A startup cause has
`phase: "startup"`, a `category` from the `ProviderFailure` schema and
its `retryability`. The run error keeps
`classification=provider_<category>` for a typed ensure failure, or
`session_ensure_failed` when the category is `unknown`.

## Verification

- `npx vitest run src/drivers/acpx src/cli
src/drivers/provider-failure.test.ts
src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts
src/live/runnerd-codex-transport-settlement.test.ts` in
`packages/paperclip-runner`: 103 of 104 files passed, 2214 tests. The 2
failures are in `installation-integrity.test.ts`. They fail the same way
on unmodified `origin/master` in this checkout (a temporary `server.js`
cannot resolve a module).
- New tests: a plain ensure error keeps its message with the
launch-environment secret and an `sk-ant-` value redacted; a `-32000`
ensure error gives category `authentication`; a non-`Error` rejection
with `errorKind: "billing_error"` gives `quota_exhausted`; an aborted
handshake gets no cause; typed and untyped ACP errors; a closed ACPX
rejection keeps its classification and a changed one gets the generic
text.
- `npx vitest run src/control-plane/acpx-controller-recovery.test.ts`: 8
passed.
- `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --no-fail-fast`: all passed. New
unit test: typed categories give `provider_<category>`; `unknown`, no
cause, a category outside the schema and an extra field each keep
`session_ensure_failed`; other closed codes keep their own
classification. New pipe test through the fake sidecar: the cause
survives the rejection, the classification is typed or generic, and the
cause text is not in the error string. In the first full run, two
`stdio_mcp` relay tests timed out. They passed in the second full run.
They do not use the changed code.
- `node --test test/acpx-sidecar-contract.test.mjs
test/protocol-contract.test.mjs test/pi-closed-startup.test.mjs`: 29
passed. The Pi probe is skipped without the Pi distribution.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner typecheck` (TypeScript,
`cargo fmt --check`, `cargo check`): passed. `pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/paperclip-runner build`: passed.
- Server, after the runner build: native provider failure, run
completion, task interruption presentation, Antigravity probe and the
related native session executor tests: 639 passed.
- Not verified: a live Claude account at its usage limit. I could not
run the credential-free Pi probe, because this checkout has no Pi
distribution. Its new expectation follows from the Pi patch, which
raises `RequestError.authRequired` for the missing credential.

## Risks

- The run error for an ACPX startup rejection with a cause now shows
Runner's closed rejection text, not "Provider request failed". This text
has only closed codes and is the same text that the run error showed
before #18622. Provider text stays in `providerFailure`.
- A plain ensure error message now becomes a displayed provider cause.
Redaction applies before the 4,000-character bound. A new credential
format that the patterns do not know can still need a new pattern. The
same risk applies to all provider causes.
- The classification of a typed ensure failure changes from
`session_ensure_failed` to `provider_<category>`. No server code matches
`session_ensure_failed`. The Pi probe expectation is updated.
- The category and retryability are evidence only. This change does not
change retry policy.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code, with tool use
(shell, file edits, test runs). The runtime does not expose the context
window or reasoning configuration.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 13:24:36 -08:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip f7fae6b738 fix(runner): preserve native Claude GitHub broker transport (#18850)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Shared agents use managed GitHub launchers to acquire credentials
for the active run.
> - Native Claude runs through the ACPX provider environment boundary.
> - That boundary keeps the launcher paths but removes their broker
transport settings.
> - Shell commands then report `capability_missing`, even when connector
tools work.
> - This pull request retains the three transport settings for explicit
Claude managed launchers.
> - Shell commands can use the existing session broker and its current
access checks.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

Native Claude through ACPX cannot authenticate shell `git` and `gh`
commands through an eligible managed GitHub connection. The launcher
reports `GitHub capability_missing`. Connector tools can still
authenticate through their own path.

**Expected behavior**

Managed shell commands acquire credentials for the active run. Provider
processes do not receive raw GitHub tokens or ambient host credentials.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Configure an eligible managed GitHub connection and a native Claude
ACPX execution.
2. Start a task and run `gh api user` through its terminal.
3. Observe `capability_missing`, although the corresponding connector
identity request succeeds.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced from source at `6ef37398c8d799c5142a3a6590ecc70ad352b663` and
current master `0b87308d5de93b4b8f18eeea89afc0bb4d9480a7` with
controlled local dependencies. The affected runtime is native Claude
through ACPX in a managed sandbox.

Related: #18212 preserves Claude launcher selectors. This change
supplies the missing broker transport. #18081 and #17599 address a
separate Legacy Codex shell-policy boundary. #15354 addresses Legacy
ACPX session hashes. The duplicate search found no open PR for this
native Claude boundary. ROADMAP.md already lists managed personal GitHub
identities; this restores that existing behavior.

## What Changed

- Retain the broker URL, session capability and bridge capability within
the existing explicit Claude managed-launcher allowlist.
- Continue to reject raw GitHub tokens, ambient broker settings,
task-supplied overrides and transport for other ACPX providers.
- Add real Bash and launcher subprocess controls with a loopback broker
and fixture Git/gh executables. Cover isolated, prepared and
preconfigured homes; changed operation identities; revocation; and
recovery.
- Confirm that broker capabilities stay out of persisted session
environment data. Update the execution guide.

The ACPX environment owner retains this behavior. Broker authorization
and credential resolution do not change. No shared API or schema changes
are needed.

## Verification

- Passing: 84 focused tests across `environment.test.ts`,
`github-launcher.test.ts`, `runtime-sandbox.test.ts` and
`configured-environment.test.ts` in the Runner package.
- Passing: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner
typecheck:typescript` and repository-wide `pnpm -r typecheck`.
- Passing: repository-wide `pnpm build`.
- Passing: 60 existing adapter-utils launcher tests; one unrelated test
is skipped.
- Passing: `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, `node
scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs`, and `git diff --check`.
- The new regression failed before the fix: both shell commands ran
anonymously and the unit check showed the three missing broker settings.
After the fix, the local broker receives each operation, changes
identity for later commands, and denies revoked access without reusing a
prior token.
- The prepared-home fixture first rejected a macOS temporary-directory
alias. It now resolves that fixture directory to its canonical path. A
launcher-control command also named a nonexistent package config; the
corrected run uses the root Vitest config.
- Both `pnpm test:run` attempts stopped in chat-suite setup when
embedded Postgres initialization exited with no numeric status. No chat
tests ran. An independent database-support probe between attempts
succeeded. The startup cause is not established; the full local suite is
not verified. No further identical retry was made.
- [CI run 41713841404, attempt
2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41713841404)
passed on `92fd931722486c111030a7efe19dfc73f530b4c8`: 48 successful jobs
and one conditional skip. This includes browser shards, general and
serialized tests, Runner static/Rust/package/native-server checks,
build, typecheck and the canary dry run. No CI jobs remain pending or
failed.
- The first CI attempt was interrupted on multiple runners. Browser and
server/chat jobs logged runner shutdown signals followed by
cancellation. The Runner static check reported lost communication with
its runner. No failing browser assertion was recorded before
termination; the summary gates failed on interrupted jobs. The
successful retry used the same source revision. It shows recovery but
does not establish why the hosts stopped.
- Greptile reviewed `92fd931722486c111030a7efe19dfc73f530b4c8` at 5/5
with no outstanding findings. All review threads are resolved, and
GitHub reports the branch as mergeable with no conflicts.

The source tests use fixture credentials and a loopback broker on macOS
arm64 with Node 25.6.1. They do not qualify a live Claude process,
deployed sandbox, Windows shell or GitHub write. No existing run or
deployed configuration was changed.

## Risks

- Claude shell commands can read the explicitly supplied broker
capabilities. Managed launchers need those capabilities. The existing
broker still enforces active session/run binding, responsible identity,
trust and connection access.
- The exception applies only when the controller supplies a Claude
managed-launcher directory. Raw GitHub tokens remain excluded, and
broker settings remain absent from persisted session environment data.
- No migration is required. Existing provider processes need their
normal retirement and restart to receive a new launch environment.
Deployment and live sandbox verification remain separate steps.

## Model Used

OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through the Codex harness, with xhigh reasoning.
Used repository inspection, code editing and shell execution. The
context window size is not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 13:15:01 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip 1423d745e8 feat(server): expose owned sleep blocker diagnostics (#18632)
Reviewed and verified at 26e5a22b3c.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 10:45:10 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 3910352c92 feat(runner): add experimental Cursor Cloud provider (#18068)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Runner gives each provider durable execution, tool, and completion
contracts.
> - Cursor Cloud currently has a direct adapter outside that native
contract.
> - Cloud work needs exact ownership across HTTP, SSE, Stop, and
recovery.
> - This PR adds a qualified Cloud API driver and verified proxy to
Runner.
> - Product setup and hosted placement remain separate dependent
changes.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #5664, #11803, #17299, and #17471. Product integration is #18069.
Managed-only API placement is #18310. The related direct-adapter
model/transcript work is not replaced. No duplicate native Cursor Cloud
integration was found.

## What Changed

- Add native `cursor_cloud` / `cursor_cloud_api` with explicit
model/repository validation, bounded HTTP/SSE, durable per-turn
checkpoints and a qualified Node proxy launched through the Rust facade.
- Commit terminal custody before publication/release; coalesce
consumers, preserve ambiguous create/Stop/recovery fences, reject late
tools, and distinguish definitely-unsent oversized requests from
ambiguous responses.
- Support scoped cold attachment, current authority, reconnect and
verified artifact staging. Keep unsupported warm/external and Windows
paths closed.
- Preserve early source cursors and verify immutable legacy prefixes
before suffix replay, including supported compaction/masking. Optional
proof publication failure falls back to complete cold verification.
- Preserve canonical records at the durable native producer with
JSON-safe privacy and the existing 8MiB bound; drain admitted successor
flushes. Reconcile upstream semantic/pack/schema/lifecycle changes and
retain S3 and legacy CLI checks.

## Verification

Core head `37c442ec8dd4`: all 66 check contexts are terminal
successful/neutral/skipped, including required `ci / verify` and `ci /
e2e`; fresh exact-head Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved threads.
Dependent Product `81e828d20a77` and Top `dd2959689627` include the
later client handoff correction and are running their own fresh gates.

Core: 47/47 Rust, 4/4 compiled-native retirement, 19/19 settlement and
normal Runner build passed. Runtime Top `9af1a5de42a2`: build and
recursive typecheck passed. Earlier source-scoped evidence includes 398
focused tests, five relay tests and token/type gates. The 251-assertion,
7/8-suite run failed physical PostgreSQL teardown; the unchanged stable
WSP suite passed 128 through the documented wrapper.

The downstream fixture corrections passed 7/7 browser and 121/121
startup tests without timeout/oracle relaxation; a broken-unsubscribe
control fails. Hosted runtime `9af1a5de42a2` has a passing normal build
and recursive typecheck. Latest dependent heads additionally contain a
pure client fix for stale live/history overlap, with 48 focused tests,
UI typecheck and token gates passing. Its new client is not deployed in
the frozen hosted image; server/native/API/provider source is unchanged
by these four downstream files.

Fresh hosted Linux admission on `9af1a5de42a2` retired its owned
runner/proxy/socket with zero prompts. The saved configuration survived
reopening, and Test authenticated the bound key/catalog/selected model
without a prompt. Artifact with `claude-sonnet-4-5` completed,
downloaded the exact 27 bytes, matched 121 canonical identities against
complete logs and independently reached FINISHED. The active Stop retry
was clicked within its immutable boundary, produced one canonical
interrupted turn and acknowledged run-only cancellation, retained a
valid 35.076s quiet window (maximum gap 4.584s), and independently
remained CANCELLED/artifact-absent beyond the original 180-second
command deadline. All provider-observer credential callbacks, DB clients
and loaders closed; accounting is settled and explicitly unpriced. The
first fresh Stop retains its failed 10.373s sampling gap and every
sample.

On the upgraded9af server, the historical F226 artifact was reopened and
downloaded with its exact original hash after its provider agent had
been deleted/GET404 earlier today. Historical F226 full Artifact/Stop
cleanup, Question, corrected Plan and reconnect retain their original
identities. Deleting the three newly created disposable provider agents
and the new-case post-delete grade remain blocked on explicit user
approval after automatic review rejected expanding the two original
approved IDs. No new-case cleanup or complete fresh matrix pass is
claimed; this is separate from the directly observed task/Stop behavior
and retained exact cleanup proof.

Retained failures: stale fixture 132/133; E8 48/135 with 87 reset-hook
failures; Mac 17 SQL failures/skips; earlier startup-title, title-save,
custody/Stop and deletion failures with unknown causes and bounded
recoveries. `dea023` Artifact passed 17 checks but Stop failed its false
warning and 50 duplicate log identities. Pre-repair ACK failure and
original Core CI failure remain recorded; retry alone establishes no
cause or full local-suite pass. Provider dollar cost stays UNKNOWN.

## Risks

Experimental: Cursor independently acknowledges neither the effective
model nor instruction digest before the first prompt. The caller’s
explicit values are submitted and behavior checked live. Unpriced
provider dollar cost stays UNKNOWN.

Only qualified per-turn controllers are admitted. Uncertain work and
incomplete cleanup stay fenced. Existing damaged/duplicate archives
remain failed evidence. Prefix proof adds bounded object-store I/O; the
8MiB producer bound does not guarantee future providers’ output fits.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, assisted with reasoning, repository tools,
code execution, browser verification, and delegated code review. The
serving model’s exact API ID and context window are not exposed. No
value is inferred from the model catalog.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used and the limits of available model
metadata
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have linked public issues or described the issue in this PR
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues
or links
- [x] My branch describes the change and contains no internal ticket ID
- [x] I have run the scoped local tests reported above; pending gates
are stated separately
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented the risks
- [x] All required CI gates pass on the current head
- [x] Fresh Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved findings on the current
head
- [x] I will address all reviewer comments before requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 08:38:57 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip b22ef22d56 fix(runner): show provider failure details on tasks and runs (#18622)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native Runner starts providers and records their run outcomes.
> - Provider failures can contain useful details below a generic
protocol error.
> - Those details were lost at the sidecar, command receipt, and run
projection boundaries.
> - A blocked task therefore showed a generic failure even when the
provider gave a clear reason.
> - This pull request carries a bounded, sanitized provider failure
through those boundaries.
> - Operators can read the actual cause on the task and run pages.
Existing recovery policy still controls retries.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #17543 for the related closed JSON-RPC classification work. Refs
#17272 for provider recovery in the legacy OpenCode adapter. This change
adds display evidence for native Runner providers and keeps recovery
policy separate.

**What happened?**

A native Claude session returned an HTTP 429 message below an ACP
`Internal error`. The task and run showed only a generic startup
failure. Operators had to inspect the provider response to learn that
the account was rate limited.

**Expected behavior**

The task and run show the sanitized provider message, provider name,
startup or turn phase, and available HTTP status. Unknown categories
keep the message. Display evidence does not grant a retry or replace a
recovery decision.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Start a native Claude run whose account is rate limited during model
selection, or return a structured provider failure from a Codex or
OpenCode turn.
2. Let the run fail and open its task page.
3. Before this change, the page shows a generic failure. With this
change, the page shows the provider explanation. The run page shows the
same explanation after reload.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Source checkout based on `f8a888a072`.

## What Changed

- Add one JSON Schema for `ProviderFailure` and generate matching Runner
and shared TypeScript readers. Keep the Runner package independent of
the app workspace at runtime.
- Normalize known ACPX, Codex, and OpenCode error fields. Preserve
unknown messages. Redact known credential values and credential patterns
before applying the 4,000-character limit. Do not copy response bodies,
headers, stacks, or prompts.
- Carry startup failures through the sidecar, Rust Runner, durable
command receipts, and private transport error details. Keep provider
text out of generic transport error strings and Sentry failure messages.
- Keep turn failures in authenticated run events. Recover the same
evidence from persisted events during server finalization. Store the
cause in the company-scoped run result.
- Show one shared notice on failed tasks and run details. Keep existing
retry permissions, scheduled retry state, and resolved-task behavior.
- Reapply registered run-secret and current-user redaction to task
display data. Batch secret lookups for only the visible provider causes.
- Document the contract and update the capability maps. Add regressions
for nested Claude 429 errors, OpenAI quota and rate limits, OpenCode
errors, redaction, durable receipt replay, restart finalization, and UI
rendering.

## Verification

- `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. `pnpm build` passed. All GitHub Actions
build, test, package, and validation jobs passed on `d49c79ab4a`. The
security checks passed. Greptile gave this head 5/5 with no open review
threads. Paperclip Review remains pending. Its review worker exhausted
six workspace recovery attempts with export_interrupted. A fresh review
request was accepted and is waiting for that saved workspace. The
ordinary Retry action rejected reuse of the stopped request. This is an
external review-worker blocker; no check was overridden. The duplicate
local `pnpm test:run` was stopped after the CI test shards passed.
- Focused server settlement, provider evidence, and restart tests: 93
passed. Runner admission and normalization tests: 103 passed. Focused
Runner wire and terminal tests: 29 passed. The real Rust/sidecar command
receipt replay test passed.
- The new projection test failed before implementation because the task
had no provider cause. The startup producer regression also failed
before extraction moved ahead of the generic error-code replacement.
Both pass with this change.
- Live check: a rebuilt local sidecar received an actual Claude HTTP 429
during startup. The new cause kept the full provider message. A
synthetic task in an isolated local app then reached the same provider
error through the native Runner path. The dedicated run result, task
API, task banner, and run detail all showed the same message after
reload. The later reporting fix keeps run.error generic; a regression
proves the display cause still survives restart and stays out of Sentry
capture.
- The first isolated app attempt failed earlier in
`admission_credential`. An ordinary manual Retry reached the provider
and produced the 429 above. This PR does not claim to fix that separate
admission failure. An initial parallel local database test setup also
failed; the serial restart suite passed.
- Security review found that copying display text into run.error could
forward it to Sentry. A regression failed with that behavior. The fix
keeps the cause in its display field. All 38 settlement/restart tests
and the server typecheck pass.
- All 29 protocol contract tests pass, including bounds and extra-field
rejection. An earlier full Rust core run passed. The later full run hit
one 5-second receipt-limit timing assertion; its isolated rerun passed.
The full Linux and Windows Rust CI jobs passed on this head.
- Review regressions pass for explicit Codex driver identity, native
Rust startup and resume receipt propagation, oversized OpenCode/ACPX
errors, task read-time registered-secret redaction, and the standalone
source closure. The focused Runner run passed 103 tests;
projection/restart tests passed 16.
- Read-time redaction edge cases passed: a missing decryption key omits
only the unsafe optional explanation; expanded redacted messages remain
visible within the Unicode character limit. All 14 task projection tests
and server typecheck pass.
- The package Build check found an old Pi assertion against
Error.message. The probe now checks the exact closed classification in
the authenticated receipt and requires the new provider cause. Both
polling transport cases pass. A local credential-free Pi probe stopped
at admission_installation because this checkout lacks the Pi
distribution; the installed Linux package probe passed in CI on this
head.
- UI coverage includes startup and turn text, unknown categories,
literal rendering of provider text, read-only retry behavior, and
resolved-task suppression. Token gates and map checks passed.
- The live check covers Claude startup on macOS. Codex, OpenCode,
terminal failures, and restart paths have deterministic regression
coverage. The change is not deployed.

## Risks

- Provider messages are untrusted text. The boundary selects specific
fields, redacts credential patterns and known environment secret values,
bounds the message, and renders plain text. New provider-specific secret
formats may need added redaction patterns.
- Optional fields preserve compatibility with older producers and stored
runs. Old runs without the field keep their current fallback text. No
database migration is required.
- The cause stays in company-scoped run data. This change does not send
provider text to first-party Telemetry or add it to OpenTelemetry span
attributes.
- Normalized categories and retryability are display evidence. Existing
recovery classifiers, retry limits, ownership checks, and approval gates
keep their authority.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution, and browser verification. The host does not expose the exact
serving variant or context window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 06:13:26 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 75fa37f30f fix(server): expire native backups from retention deadlines (#18380)
Reviewed and verified at 5b137b5cda.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-31 14:31:31 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 59da15066a feat(runner): deliver native Kimi Code (#18391)
Deliver native Kimi Code setup, exact models, scoped credentials, verified packages and runtime packs. Preserve current upstream release attestations and restore verified same-run remote retry dispatch without weakening process ownership.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 22:26:15 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip b866fa4bdc feat(runner): add pinned Kimi Code native runtime (#18028)
Add the pinned Kimi Code runtime, native instruction and model admission, scoped credentials, and pending-candidate recovery contracts. Retain current master release attestations and provider-pack compatibility.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 21:58:12 -05:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip 493e229d93 perf(runner): cache verified native executable digests (#18390)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their task execution.
> - Runner checks qualified native programs before it starts a provider.
> - Installation checks and command opening can hash the same program
again.
> - A new sidecar process repeats this work on a later warm task.
> - This pull request stores the computed digest in a private filesystem
cache.
> - Every cache hit still checks the independently selected trusted
digest and current file metadata.
> - An unchanged program can start without another full native file
read.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
Repeated **qualified ACPX** native executable admission in Runner.
Claude, ACPX-Codex, and Grok use this verifier in both Core-owned and
plugin-backed launches. The ordinary native Codex app-server launcher is
a different path and is not changed. A retained provider that opens no
new native command has no saved hash work here. The measured Claude task
path does not require a comment backlog.

**Current behavior**
Installation verification and final command opening each read and hash
the native executable. The qualified Linux x64 Claude file is
241,667,256 bytes. A new verification and command lease reads
483,334,512 native bytes. Another Node process repeats both reads.

**Proposed behavior**
Store the actual computed SHA-256 digest by device, inode, size,
nanosecond modification time, and nanosecond change time. Reuse it
across Runner and sidecar processes. Compare each hit with the current
build-owned digest. Hash the file on a miss or changed identity. This
replaces the earlier Claude-only deferral design in this same PR.

**Reason and benefit**
The first verification and command lease reads the native file once.
Later processes read none of its native bytes while its identity stays
the same. Related: #16372 established qualified executable admission.
This change is independent of other preparation PRs. It does not change
provider pins or profile versions.

## What Changed

- Add a shared filesystem digest cache under the absolute OS temporary
root at `paperclip-runner-<uid>/executable-digests-v1`.
- Use private directories and files, versioned hash-only filenames,
bounded JSON entries, and atomic temporary-file replacement. Cache files
contain a version and the computed digest. They contain no credentials
or source paths.
- Fall back to full hashing when the cache is missing, unreadable,
malformed, or unusable. Keep current expected-digest selection outside
the cache.
- Keep cache data outside task homes. Neither `HOME` nor task cwd
selects the path. The OS temporary-root selection honors absolute
platform `TMPDIR`, `TMP`, or `TEMP` overrides. A relative root disables
caching. Hosts must keep that root outside task workspaces. Temp cleanup
causes a later rehash.
- Keep the no-follow executable open, regular-file and size checks,
execute permission, descriptor ownership, before/after identity checks,
and preparation-to-launch identity comparison. Cache publication occurs
before the final identity checks.
- Use this path for standalone installation checks and final command
opening. Remove the earlier pending-digest type and Claude-only launch
helper. Runtime host and profile selection keep their original
structure.
- Test changed content, all fingerprint fields, symlinks, mode changes,
inode replacement, mutation during lookup/publication, concurrent cache
writers, wrong trusted pins, and cache failures.
- Include a deliberate trust-boundary test: a process running as the
same OS user can plant a matching cached digest for changed bytes. It
opens a test descriptor and executes nothing.

In plain language: Runner remembers the hash for the same file. It still
checks which file it opened and which hash the build requires. The cache
trusts the OS user who can write it.

## Verification

From `packages/paperclip-runner`:

- `../../node_modules/.bin/vitest run
src/drivers/acpx/executable-digest-cache.test.ts
src/drivers/acpx/installation-integrity.test.ts
src/drivers/acpx/runtime-host.test.ts` — 177 passed, 6 platform-specific
skips.
- `../../node_modules/.bin/tsc -p tsconfig.json --noEmit` — passed.
- `git diff --check` and the added-line secret, PII, private-address,
and code-comment scan — passed.

The offline comparison uses baseline
`45a3a92e6dc52d20923b9aa34a22fee2ec5443f9` and treatment
`c4356df12032448de90516ae329d8f939af10984`. Each sample starts a
different Node process. Each normal sample runs the actual qualified
installation verifier and opens a command lease. Seven samples per case
follow one warmup. The cache is removed before each cold case. The next
process reuses its entry. Baseline order alternates around the treatment
pair. Command digest and package paths match in every pair.

| Verifier plus command opening | Baseline | Cold cache | Later process
hit |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Full native reads | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Native bytes read | 483,334,512 | 241,667,256 | 0 |
| Local median, ms | 1041.26 | 602.70 | 130.17 |
| Local range, ms | 994.20–1133.11 | 580.27–999.83 | 121.96–179.45 |
| Median whole child process, ms | 1379.96 | 988.75 | 523.01 |

Raw verifier-plus-open samples in ms:

- Baseline: 1133.11, 1074.40, 1061.99, 1041.26, 994.20, 1036.12,
1037.70.
- Cold: 647.13, 646.33, 999.83, 584.83, 580.27, 583.37, 602.70.
- Later process hit: 179.45, 138.37, 134.39, 130.17, 121.96, 122.33,
126.68.

Separate direct-opener fault probes use a disposable copy of that same
native file:

| Change | Native bytes read | Result | Local open, ms |
| --- | ---: | --- | ---: |
| First copied file | 241,667,256 | Accepted | 526.14 |
| Next process, different HOME and task cwd | 0 | Accepted | 24.91 |
| Changed timestamps | 241,667,256 | Accepted after hashing | 531.40 |
| New inode, identical bytes | 241,667,256 | Accepted after hashing |
536.70 |
| Corrupt byte, same size and exactly restored mtime | 241,667,256 |
Rejected | Whole process: 841.36 |
| Different independent trusted pin | 0 | Rejected | Whole process:
374.76 |

The corruption probe keeps `mtimeNs` exactly equal before and after, at
`1000000000000000000`. Its changed `ctimeNs` invalidates the entry.
Cache expiry is not required. The changed-pin probe rejects the old
actual digest without a native read.

The cached image is
`sha256:99ce80690a0c13328f41fd84156cc73e1ac562eaed3120fd41d04d7acdfb325d`.
The Node binary is `/opt/paperclip/runner/libexec/node`, version
`v24.20.0`. The artifact is Claude SDK `0.3.286`, with expected digest
`sha256:fe503f65c6289d59c23e5b21ae44f03583f997dd33a2cbfc75ab4f96fb8fc73f`.
The container used a read-only root, a disposable writable tmpfs, and
disabled network. No provider process, model request, credential, or
deployment was used.

**These elapsed values are diagnostics from Linux x64 CPU emulation on
an ARM64 Docker host. They are not production latency or TTFT
estimates.** The exact byte counts, cross-process reuse, output
equality, and invalidation results are the portable evidence.

The saved phase 0 exports have no directly comparable native executable
hashing span. Their broad `runner.transport.attach` spans include other
work. A production comparison within 20% is therefore unavailable for
this seam. The earlier local 919 ms control was also an emulation
diagnostic; it is not a production baseline.

The initial Docker attempt was denied access to the local socket by the
sandbox. The same offline command then ran with local socket permission.
An initial fault probe restored mtime through a `Date`, which did not
prove exact nanosecond equality. Its raw report is retained as
historical; the final probe sets and verifies an exact mtime before and
after corruption. The prior Claude-only implementation and its checks
and measurements remain historical evidence. They do not qualify this
replacement.

The superseded home-directory cache head had one browser recovery test
timeout in its GitHub workflow. It expected a saved title after session
recovery. The failure is retained. No browser code was changed; the
current head reruns CI after moving the cache outside task homes.

No full local CI suite was run, as requested. GitHub CI supplies full
regression coverage. Current head
`c4356df12032448de90516ae329d8f939af10984` passed the complete [GitHub
workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41145223331),
including all browser shards. Its latest checks have 56 successes and 2
intended skips, including both security scans started when the PR became
ready. Standard Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no open
findings. Apex then reviewed the same head at 5/5 under the documented
OS-user trust policy. It reported no new findings. There are no
unresolved review threads. The PR is ready for review and remains
unmerged.

## Risks

- This deliberately weakens protection against the same OS user. That
user can write the cache and can plant a chosen digest for a file
fingerprint. A cache hit trusts that record; metadata identity is not a
fresh content hash. The explicit fault test documents this accepted
policy.
- A read-only administrator-owned Runner can use this user-writable
cache. The cache has no signature, secret, or daemon. It does not
require a Launcher or ROM change.
- Other users cannot use normal cache permissions to write these
entries. Cache errors fall back to hashing. Removing the cache directory
restores full hashing. Old fingerprints leave small unused entries until
the cache is removed or OS temp cleanup evicts it. Temp eviction costs
one later full hash.
- A changed file normally rehashes. A digest that differs from the
independent current pin still fails admission. Existing command,
package, credential, process-lifetime, and final dispatch checks remain.
- No schema, public protocol, package dependency, profile version, or
provider pin changes.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, code editing, test
execution, and tool use. This session does not expose a more precise
serving model ID or context-window capacity.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used with the details available to this
session
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the enhancement
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues
or links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
ticket ID
- [x] The targeted local tests pass; the full local suite was not run as
requested
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented risks
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green for the replacement head
- [x] Standard Greptile is 5/5 with no open findings for the replacement
head
- [x] Apex is 5/5 on the current head with no unresolved findings
- [x] I will address review findings before requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 17:07:32 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 18b1637b63 fix(runner): accept late Antigravity login URL during drain (#18254)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages work performed by AI agents.
> - The native Runner owns Antigravity subscription sign-in.
> - Sign-in receives completion on stdout and the browser URL on stderr.
> - The two pipes can deliver the completion result before the valid
URL.
> - The owner rejected that URL after it entered the completed phase.
> - This pull request accepts one validated URL while the same child
drains.
> - A real child regression now proves the order and the failure
controls.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18188, #18189, and #18190. Related qualification work: #18345 and
#18356. The duplicate search found this existing PR, so this update
preserves its history and adds the real child proof here.

**What happened?**

A valid sign-in can fail when the authenticate response arrives before
the authorization URL on the other pipe. The completed phase then
rejects the valid URL. The same existing success case failed in [current
follow-up
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41138618869/job/124347859445).
That log has no stream-order trace, so it does not prove its inner
failure branch.

**Expected behavior**

Both valid delivery orders must succeed. Invalid or duplicate URLs,
unexpected protocol requests, failed retirement, and failed credential
verification must still fail.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Run a synthetic native child that completes authenticate on stdout.
2. Wait for stdin EOF before it emits the authorization URL on stderr.
EOF proves that the parent accepted the result and began retirement.
3. The valid case fails on frozen master
`45a3a92e6dc52d20923b9aa34a22fee2ec5443f9`. The invalid and duplicate
controls pass there.
4. Run the same regression with this PR's existing production fix. All
three cases pass.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Existing reviewed PR parent: `646f5cdf37898ad54e1fa1cdfe39f59844da3e7c`.
Frozen actual master for the real child RED:
`45a3a92e6dc52d20923b9aa34a22fee2ec5443f9`.

## What Changed

- Accept one fully validated authorization URL in the authentication or
completed-drain phase. Keep duplicate rejection and all existing URL
checks.
- Retain the ten existing in-memory controls for both valid orders and
eight failure paths.
- Add three real child cases for valid, invalid, and duplicate late
URLs. Use stdin EOF to order the streams without sleeps or a mocked
retirement handler.
- Check exact protocol requests, child exit, close-once behavior,
Google-call counts, and persisted refresh rotation. This update changes
only the existing test file; it adds no production delta to the reviewed
parent.

## Verification

- Frozen actual master: the new valid real child case fails, while both
negative controls pass. The original eight-control parent calibration
also remains recorded in this PR's history.
- Existing fixed source plus the new tests: 24 passed. This includes 11
existing authentication tests, ten stream controls, and three real child
cases.
- Late invalid and duplicate URLs fail with zero Google calls. The valid
case makes two mocked identity calls and saves the rotated synthetic
refresh token. All three retire the real child and close the command
lease once.
- Scoped owning TypeScript `noEmit` passes for the auth module and both
test files. The temporary configuration is not committed. Diff and
credential-pattern checks pass.
- The tests use real child pipes and private synthetic files. Google
responses and the command installation are mocked. No provider account,
network request, model run, app, or QA deployment was used.
- Full monorepo typecheck, tests, and build were not run locally. Fresh
[normal
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41140757050)
passes on `1744c9f3374f78b10c2f15c42f3cf5d3af8c3119`: 56 successful
checks, two skipped, and one neutral. Typecheck, build, Rust, static,
Runner, server and browser lanes pass. Greptile gives that exact head a
fresh 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. The PR is mergeable and clean.
The earlier parent's passing CI remains historical evidence only.

## Risks

The change accepts a URL while the same authenticated child drains. It
still validates the exact OAuth URL and rejects a second URL. Success
still requires the authenticate result, verified credentials, and proven
process retirement. No provider pins, contracts, timeout bounds,
retries, or public APIs change. Existing documentation already specifies
these sign-in semantics; no documentation change is needed.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with tool use and code execution. The
exact runtime model ID and context window were not exposed in this
session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 18:05:05 -05:00
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5 8362dbff4d feat(runner): make every ACPX provider declare its release attestation (#18342)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native ACPX runs admit a provider only when its saved profile
version and `commandDigest` match the current profile exactly.
> - #18325 made every provider digest attest its upstream release, and
bound the shared ACPX layer and Runner source through the pack
`contractDigest`.
> - The model is documented, but it lived in prose. A new provider, such
as one in an open PR, could still choose another digest model without
any check or guidance.
> - This pull request makes the model the default path: each provider
declares its attestation in one registry, and the generator, a test and
a scoped rule explain the pattern where contributors meet it.
> - The benefit is that new providers and upstream bumps follow one
model, without a growing list of blocked legacy patterns.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18325, #18237.

**What happened?**

After #18325, only Copilot, Grok and Pi went through
`acpx-release-attestations.mjs`. Cursor and Antigravity had separate
inline checks in the generator, and Claude and Codex had none. A new
provider could add a profile with any digest. Nothing told the author
how to compute it, and nothing pinned the profile versions that now
change only for deliberate resets.

**Expected behavior**

Every ACPX provider declares how its `commandDigest` attests the
upstream release. Tools and review guidance describe the pattern when a
contributor adds a provider, bumps an upstream release or changes a
version.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Add a new provider profile to
`packages/paperclip-runner/acpx-profiles.json` with an arbitrary
`commandDigest`.
2. Run `node
packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/generate-acpx-profiles.mjs --check`.
3. Before this change, the check passes.

## What Changed

- Add `ACPX_RELEASE_ATTESTATIONS` to
`scripts/acpx-release-attestations.mjs`. Every profile declares one
kind:
- `installed-command` (Claude, Codex): installation hashes the upstream
launch command.
  - `launcher` (Grok): the SHA-256 of the launcher shipped verbatim.
- `closure` (Copilot, Pi): upstream versions and complete platform
closure pins.
- `declaration` (Cursor, Antigravity): a checked-in release declaration,
as canonical JSON.
- `generate-acpx-profiles.mjs` checks every profile through the
registry. The separate Cursor and Antigravity digest checks are now part
of the same path. No digest changes.
- A profile without a declared attestation fails generation. The message
says to declare one and points to the rule.
- A stale digest message now says that a digest changes only with its
upstream release, and that an upstream change keeps the profile version.
- Add a test that pins the profile versions. It explains that a bump
resets every saved session for that provider, and that a new provider
starts at 1.
- Add `rules/acpx-profile-identity.mdc`. It describes the identity
model, how to add a provider, when to bump a version, and review
criteria. `AGENTS.md` and `.greptile/files.json` route the profile,
attestation, contract-registry, ACPX driver and provider paths to it.
- Update the profile identity section in
`packages/paperclip-runner/docs/durable-recovery.md` with the
attestation kinds and the version policy.

## Verification

- In `packages/paperclip-runner`:
- `node scripts/generate-acpx-profiles.mjs --check` passes. Running it
without `--check` changes no digest.
- `node --test scripts/acpx-release-attestations.test.mjs
scripts/contracts/contract-fingerprints.test.mjs`: 22 tests pass. New
cases: every profile declares an attestation, a new provider without one
fails with guidance, and Cursor and Antigravity declaration changes
affect only their own digests.
- `vitest run src/drivers/acpx/profile-compatibility.test.ts`: 15 tests
pass, including the version table.
  - `tsc -p tsconfig.json --noEmit` passes.

## Risks

- Low risk. No digest, version or runtime admission behavior changes.
- A new provider PR must add one registry entry. The generator error
states what to add.
- The version table needs an edit for each deliberate reset. Upstream
bumps do not touch it.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use
(shell, file edits, local test runs).

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 11:25:06 -07:00
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5 abc270ee4c fix(runner): attest upstream releases and bind ACPX uniformly for every harness (#18325)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native ACPX runs admit a provider only when its saved profile and
`commandDigest` match the current profile exactly.
> - For Copilot, Grok and Pi, `commandDigest` hashed dozens of Paperclip
source files. Claude, Codex, Cursor and Antigravity hash only their
upstream release.
> - Any change to a bound source therefore advanced these profiles.
#18212 alone moved Copilot from v88 to v91 and Grok from v15 to v19.
Each bump reset in-flight sessions and added immutable identity fixtures
(about 160 on master).
> - #18237 added the provider pack `contractDigest`, which now guards
Runner source compatibility at the pack boundary.
> - This pull request changes the Copilot, Grok and Pi digests to
upstream release attestations, as the other providers already use.
> - It also binds the shared ACPX layer the same way for every ACPX
harness: the profile's `acpxVersion` and the pack `contractDigest`,
which now covers the Runner's ACPX patch.
> - The benefit is that Runner source changes no longer reset these
sessions or need new profile versions and fixtures.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18237, #18212, #17972.

**What happened?**

A Runner change that touched a bound source file changed the Copilot,
Grok or Pi `commandDigest`. The author had to advance the profile
version, regenerate an identity fixture and keep every old fixture. On
deploy, saved sessions for that provider failed the exact admission
check and started fresh.

**Expected behavior**

A provider's `commandDigest` changes only when its upstream release
changes: an upstream version, a platform closure, the ACPX patch or the
Grok launcher. Runner source compatibility is the job of the pack
`contractDigest`.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. On master, change a comment in `src/drivers/acpx/runtime-host.ts`.
2. Run `node packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/grok-profile-identity.mjs
--check`.
3. The check fails. The Grok profile must advance, and the next deploy
resets Grok sessions.

## What Changed

- Add `packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/acpx-release-attestations.mjs`.
It computes the release attestation for each provider:
- Copilot and Pi: a canonical-JSON hash of the profile version, upstream
package versions and the platform closure pins (Pi also binds its Node
version).
- Grok: the SHA-256 of `launcher.cjs`. Admission already hashes these
bytes.
- The attestation binds no Paperclip source, shared ACPX layer, absolute
path, pack manifest digest or install layout.
- Bind the shared ACPX layer once for every ACPX harness (Claude, Codex,
Copilot, Cursor, Grok, Pi, Antigravity):
- Add the Runner's ACPX patch (`patches/acpx@<runner acpx
version>.patch`) to the pack `contractDigest`. A patch change now
retires older image packs for every harness. Other packages' ACPX
patches are not read. A build context without the Runner's patch fails.
- Remove the ACPX patch hash from Cursor's release declaration
(`cursor-contract.json`) and advance Cursor once to profile 17. Copilot,
Pi and Cursor no longer bind ACPX in their own digests, like Claude,
Codex, Grok and Antigravity.
- Saved inputs for every harness already must match the current
`acpxVersion`.
  - Claude and Codex digests do not change.
- `generate-acpx-profiles.mjs` writes these digests to
`acpx-profiles.json`. `check:acpx-profiles` refuses a stale digest.
- Move the Copilot closure pins to `copilot-closure-pins.ts`, so that
the generator can import them. `copilot-installation.ts` re-exports
them.
- Advance each profile once and then freeze it: Copilot 92, Grok 20, Pi
37. A version change at the switch keeps the rollout on the same path as
every earlier profile bump.
- Replace the historical version lists in `profile-compatibility.ts`
with a range. Every revision from 1 through the current one decodes.
Claude and Codex still decode revisions 1 through 5. Launch and recovery
admission still require the exact current profile and digest.
- Delete:
- `scripts/copilot-profile-identity.mjs`,
`scripts/grok-profile-identity.mjs` and its test
  - the Grok launcher source stamp
- 159 Copilot, Grok and Pi identity fixtures, including three
unreferenced `copilot-mainline-v*` fixtures. The Cursor fixtures stay.
- Rewrite the affected tests as behaviour checks:
- Each provider admits only the exact current profile. Every earlier
version decodes and is refused at admission.
- The last source-bound digests, and a changed digest at the current
version, are refused by recovery and by the backend factory.
- The Rust Pi descriptor test uses the generated profile instead of
fixtures.
- New `acpx-release-attestations.test.mjs`: a relocated copy of the
inputs gives the same digests, each upstream input changes only its own
providers, and the generator refreshes and checks the manifest.
- Remove the fixture exceptions from `.dockerignore`. Add the
attestation script and the generator to the Daytona image content
inputs.
- Update the Pi install probe and the Rust integration constant for the
new Pi digest.
- Update the docs to describe the current attestation model:
`doc/grok-native-runner.md`, `doc/RUNNER-INTEGRATION-PLAYBOOK.md`,
`doc/observability.md`,
`packages/paperclip-runner/docs/durable-recovery.md`, and the Copilot,
Pi and rich ACP architecture reports. Each report now opens with the
current profile identity; earlier source-bound profiles remain as dated
chronology. No doc references a deleted file.

## Verification

- In `packages/paperclip-runner`:
- `node --test scripts/acpx-release-attestations.test.mjs
scripts/contracts/contract-fingerprints.test.mjs`: 19 tests pass,
including a Runner ACPX patch edit that changes the contract digest,
other patch edits (including `acpx@0.12.0` for `adapter-utils`) that do
not, and a build context without the patch that fails.
  - `node scripts/generate-acpx-profiles.mjs --check` passes.
- `vitest run src/drivers/acpx src/backends src/contracts`: 1647 tests
pass, 9 skipped.
  - `tsc -p tsconfig.json --noEmit` passes.
- From the repository root, `vitest run --config
tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts
tests/runner-e2e/daytona-image.test.ts`: 11 tests pass.
- In `server`, the 8 test files that use ACPX profiles, pack digests or
`contractDigest`: 1617 tests pass.
- Not run locally: the Rust tests and `cargo fmt`, because this machine
has no Rust toolchain. CI runs them.
- Before this change, a synthetic upgrade check built two Runner
revisions that differ only in shared source. A Claude checkpoint saved
under the first revision rebinds under the second, and a changed Claude
`commandDigest` starts fresh. This confirms that the provider JSON has
no other build-dependent field.

## Risks

- **One reset at rollout.** The Copilot, Grok, Pi and Cursor digests and
versions change once. Saved sessions for these providers start fresh on
their next run, as after any earlier profile bump. After this change,
Runner source changes no longer cause this reset.
- **Lost "source changed, so requalify" signal.** The old digest forced
a new profile version when bound source changed. Nothing enforced
requalification: Copilot was last qualified at v47. Pack-boundary
contract changes are now caught by the pack `contractDigest`.
- **Image packs are retired once for every provider.** Adding the ACPX
patch changes the pack `contractDigest`, so the controller uploads its
bundled pack (about 16 s per remote start) until images are refreshed.
Claude and Codex sessions are not reset: their digests and versions do
not change.
- **Grok launcher and closure pins.** The Grok digest covers only the
launcher bytes. Grok's runtime version is still checked separately at
admission, as before.
- **Grok digest equals early Grok profiles.** The launcher bytes have
not changed since profile 1, so the new Grok digest equals the published
profile 1 digest. The profile version still separates them: launch,
recovery and the backend factory require profile 20. An image pack from
that period has no `contractDigest`, so the pack gate refuses it.
`remote-provider-pack-verification.test.ts` now covers this case.
- **Docker context checks** run `generate-acpx-profiles.mjs --check`,
which now imports `.ts` pin files through Node type stripping.
`materialize-pi-distribution.mjs` already relies on this on Node 24.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use
(shell, file edits, local test runs).

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 09:10:50 -07:00
Nicky Leach fba0ab8162 fix(runner): preserve GitHub helpers and Codex probe policy (#18212) 2026-10-30 07:42:10 -07:00
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5 fa760dbce4 fix(runner): reuse image packs only with matching contract digest (#18237)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Remote native runs use a provider pack. The controller reuses a
protected pack from the sandbox image when the pack is compatible.
> - #17749 gates this reuse on a hand-maintained interface revision in
`provider-pack-contract.json`.
> - Later changes altered the runner/pack boundary (#17922, #18188), but
nobody bumped the revision. A stale Claude or Codex image pack can still
be reused across a sidecar contract change. This is the failure class of
#17972.
> - A manual revision has a "forgot to bump" failure mode. Source-byte
hashes change on every refactor, so they are too brittle.
> - This pull request declares the sidecar `session.open` contract in
its JSON schema and computes a contract digest from the JSON contracts
and Rust shapes.
> - Image-pack reuse now requires an equal digest.
> - The benefit is that an incidental change keeps image packs reusable,
and a real contract change retires them automatically.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #17749, #17972, #17922, #18188.

**What happened?**

The controller reused an image provider pack when `compatibility.acpx`
and the selected agent's profile digest matched. For Claude and Codex,
that profile digest binds only the upstream executable. The ACPX
interface revision stayed at 1 after later sidecar contract changes. A
pack built before those changes passed the reuse check.

**Expected behavior**

The controller reuses an image pack only when the pack uses the same
runner/pack contracts as the controller's bundled pack. Comments,
formatting and refactors do not change that result.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Build an image pack from a commit before a sidecar input change, such
as a new `session.open` field.
2. Run a controller from a later commit that sends the new field, with
the same interface revision and Claude version.
3. Before this fix, `verifyRemoteProviderPack` accepts the old image
pack.

## What Changed

- Declare the sidecar `session.open` parameter set as a closed
`sessionOpenParams` definition in `acpx-sidecar.schema.json`.
- `generate-acpx-sidecar-contract.mjs` now generates
`GENERATED_ACPX_SIDECAR_OPEN_PARAMS` from it.
- `parseOpenParams` uses the generated list instead of an inline `Set`.
The accepted set is unchanged.
- This is the surface of #17972. The schema is now its source of truth.
- Declare the nested `session.open` contracts that the sidecar parses
strictly:
- `protocol/provider-schemas/runtime-context.schema.json` closes every
runtime context object. `parseNativeRuntimeContext` uses the field lists
that `scripts/generate-runtime-context-contract.mjs` generates from it.
- The sidecar schema declares the closed `providerPolicy` object, and
`parseProviderPolicy` uses its generated field list.
  - The accepted fields do not change.
- Add
`packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/contracts/contract-fingerprints.mjs`.
It fingerprints these contracts:
  - the PRP and sidecar JSON schemas, with annotation text removed
  - the generated catalogs in `generated/`
- the Rust serde shapes, `json!` payload keys, match literals and env
keys in `runner-core/src`, without test-only modules
  - the reserved env key lists in `configured_environment.rs`
- Read only the trees that every pack build context contains. Fail when
a registered source is missing, so two build contexts cannot silently
produce different digests.
- Use only Node built-ins. The registry adds no dependency.
- Write `contractDigest` as a top-level payload field in
`build-provider-pack.mjs`. The manifest digest algorithm and the
existing field layout do not change.
- Require an equal `contractDigest` for image-pack reuse in
`remote-provider-pack-verification.ts`. A pack without a digest is not
reused. The controller uploads its bundled pack, as it does today for
any incompatible pack.
- Re-attest the source-hashed profiles, because this PR changes their
bound sidecar sources:
- Grok becomes profile 15 and now also binds the generated allowlist, so
a Grok field change in the schema still invalidates the Grok identity.
- Copilot becomes profile 88, and also binds the generated runtime
context fields.
  - Earlier profiles stay decodable.
- Add the registry script and `generated/` to the Daytona image content
inputs.
- Document the digest and the schema-first rule in
`docker/daytona-runner/README.md` and `doc/DEVELOPING.md`.

## Verification

- `node --test scripts/contracts/contract-fingerprints.test.mjs` (in
`packages/paperclip-runner`): 4 tests pass.
  - These changes keep the digest:
    - schema description text
    - schema reformatting
    - renaming `parseOpenParams`
    - Rust comments, `#[serde(skip)]` fields and `#[cfg(test)]` modules
- edits to the `#[path]` test module `tests/provider_api_validation.rs`
  - These changes alter the digest:
    - a new `session.open` schema field
    - a changed constraint on the `remainingWork[].description` property
    - a new reserved env key
    - a new sidecar env key
    - a new checkpoint field
  - A build context without a registered source fails.
- `node --test test/acpx-sidecar-contract.test.mjs`: 13 tests pass. A
new case rejects an unknown `session.open` parameter and accepts each
declared parameter.
- `node --test scripts/grok-profile-identity.test.mjs`: 4 tests pass. A
change to the Grok field in the generated allowlist invalidates the Grok
identity.
- `generate-acpx-profiles.mjs --check`,
`generate-acpx-sidecar-contract.mjs --check` and
`generate-protocol-manifest.mjs --check` pass.
- Runner vitest suites pass: 470 passed, 1 skipped. They cover the
sidecar, sidecar input and protocol, Copilot and Pi installation,
profile compatibility, native execution, recovery identity, the backend
factory and the environment.
- Server tests: pack verification, executor and artifact preparation
pass (1,004 tests).
- `tsc --noEmit` passes for `packages/paperclip-runner` and `server`.
- `tests/runner-e2e/daytona-image.test.ts`: 10 of 11 tests pass. The
failing test also fails on `master`. It expects a literal
`profile-v19-identity.json` line in `.dockerignore`, which uses a
`profile-v*` glob.
- Not run locally:
- A complete `build-provider-pack.mjs` run. The builder rejects the
local Homebrew Node because it is not portable after relocation.
- Rust tests and `acpx-controller-recovery.test.ts`, because `cargo` is
not installed.
  - The full `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm test:run` and `pnpm build`.

## Risks

- Only JSON contracts and Rust shapes are part of the digest. The
remaining TypeScript-only definitions are the `paperclip_finish` and
`paperclip_block` tool schemas in `completion-result.ts` and the
TypeScript env key lists. They are not covered until they move into a
schema. The nested `expectedIdentity` and `tools` values ignore unknown
fields, so a change there cannot cause a startup rejection.
- A change there can let a stale image pack be reused. The sidecar then
rejects the input with its strict parser error.
  - Today, Claude and Codex image packs have no contract check at all.
- The digest covers all registered contracts for the whole pack. A
contract change for one provider kind also retires image packs for the
other. Each replacement costs about 16 s per remote start until the
image is refreshed.
- Existing image packs have no digest. After deploy, the controller
uploads its bundled pack until the image is rebuilt.
- The Grok and Copilot re-attestations start fresh sessions for those
agents once after deploy, as each profile bump does today.
- The Daytona image content ID formula changes, so the next image build
does not reuse a cached image.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code in the
desktop app, with repository tools, shell execution and research
subagents. The session does not expose the context window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-29 22:55:11 -07:00
Nicky Leach a8e07500db fix(runner): preserve runtime activity through the native bridge (#18239) 2026-10-29 18:36:04 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip ebed7f5237 test(evals): protect Antigravity setup and two-turn delivery (#18190)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and their work.
> - A provider integration must work through ordinary agent setup and
task controls.
> - The recorded Antigravity walkthrough exposed setup, delivery, and
continuation failures.
> - A repeatable check must verify real work and retain failed attempts.
> - This pull request converts all 47 recorded steps into one fixed
Product E2E journey.
> - Maintainers can rerun the case and inspect independent delivery,
cleanup, and accounting evidence.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Builds on merged #18187, #18188, and #18189, and consumes the shared
repairs from merged #18230 and the equivalent manual-policy declaration
from #18222. Refs #18214 for the CI task wrapper. Refs #12503 and #14938
for related legacy adapter work.

**Agent or provider**

Google Antigravity native Runner with a saved managed Google
subscription and the exact Low model.

**Why this adapter is useful**

A user must be able to add an agent, connect its account, and receive
real task results across a follow-up. Picker visibility alone is
insufficient.

**How the agent is invoked**

A fixed Playwright driver uses ordinary product controls. The agent runs
through native ACP. Independent checks use public APIs, actual
downloads, owned process observations, and native lifetime fences.

## What Changed

- Register one explicit-only case:
`antigravity-agent-journey.runner-antigravity.local.saved-subscription-two-turn`.
- Map all 47 source steps and declare saved-account prerequisites,
finite limits, and same-host macOS ARM64 scope.
- Create an agent through the ordinary picker, connect the saved
account, select Low, run Test, and wait for readiness. Save an
instruction marker, deliver a file, and update it through an ordinary
follow-up.
- Require each run's visible completed file activity, exact downloaded
bytes, committed Done result, same tagged conversation, distinct
physical owner birth, released lease, and free native fences. Verify
reload persistence.
- Stop failed native runs that still own a retry. Replay an existing
Stop with its durable request identity and wait for the matching audited
acknowledgement. A terminal reservation without a native intent remains
unconfirmed.
- Keep private evidence in the existing result, report, dashboard, and
accounting pipeline. Retain the paused QA agent and financial history
while preserving the shared account and budget policies.
- Journal only the ordinary wizard's future ID, target, name, intended
harness and expected creator before forwarding its POST unchanged. Bind
the response and interrupted recovery to exact identity reads; a pending
404 stays unconfirmed.
- Serialize private resource snapshots through temporary-file fsync,
atomic rename and directory fsync. Abort forwarding on storage failure
and preserve legacy receipts. If later journal or diagnostic writes
fail, retain the primary error, always close the browser, and attempt
the ordinary failed report.
- Add production-component browser controls and harden task-menu
readiness, alias selection, scroll restoration, failure packaging, and
one hermetic auth-test budget.
- Wait for the existing GitHub recovery fixture to register its next
deadline before asserting the original range; preserve its
nested-transaction and zero-request checks. In the decision-expiry
fixture, verify the exact saved expiry separately from the earlier
global wake of another queue.

## Verification

- Fresh registered acceptance passed on eval source
`9060f3cd01b7c3445ecdf703d72e9cf30fe42b59` and merged serving product
`61bd4ac6919c2309f766a25e62273b074cee3261`. It completed ordinary setup
and two turns with native `.5` and `gemini-3.8-flash-low`. All 16
matchers, 14 checkpoints, and cleanup passed in **165,613 ms**. Actual
downloads were **61 bytes** and **119 bytes**. Both turns passed their
own run-bound browser activity checks and reload persistence.
- Independent read-back confirms Done, a paused retained agent, the same
connected saved default account, and no active owned run. Both accepted
results have the same full tagged conversation and distinct primary
process births. All 21 observed processes retired; both leases released
and all three native fences were free after each turn. The selected `.5`
checkpoints also showed equal agent/backend session IDs; this is an
observed case requirement, not a generic ACP invariant.
- Receipts report 339,273 input tokens, 7,224 output tokens, and 202,846
cached input tokens. Subscription prices are unavailable. Billing
coverage remains incomplete, not free.
- The normal report CLI passed. All 310 files from nine original
attempts and two separate recoveries retained their hashes. The twelve
current screenshots are byte-identical, and 194 local report links are
contained and valid. The eight earlier reports were copied without
regeneration.
- Delivery source `1bf4fb04df04710b82844b3c9355767f46b5f68f` branches
from `d3f2a60e795fc60d64c8b19d1eed4d48657d5492` and merges cleanly with
current master `1d571de5f9f886d66e520800baec8fc2f67d0948`. All 41 prior
`c8b332` authored file blobs remain identical; the 42nd path is the
decision-expiry fixture contract correction. Creation ownership, the
strict durable writer, and the ordinary successful workflow remain
unchanged. Of 43 measured file blobs, 30 remain identical. The
Antigravity oracle, artifact, billing and report gates and its
suite-specific validation block remain unchanged. The actual retained
agent matches its original creator; its original request `setupId` was
not captured and is not reconstructed.
- Later master changes include model-visible workspace guidance and
rejected-terminal-report handling. Their bounded source assessment is
separate: the first actual finish failed, then a same-turn replacement
was accepted and committed. Later read-only results match both original
native-result hashes, and the complete event catalogs have no
`session.failed` event. Master #18228 also expands detection of explicit
JSON file requests. The measured create/update-and-attach `.txt` task
already required publication under both parsers; the publication
validation gate itself is unchanged. Master #18240 changes remote
workspace cache staging and adds an OpenCode index refresh. The selected
local lane returns before those paths. Master #18213 adds optional
numeric turn timing and trace boundaries. Its selected Antigravity
model, text, IDs, result and retirement semantics remain unchanged in
the bounded source review. Local diagnostic rows and awaits can change
event ordinals and latency; the oracle checks relative semantic order.
Collector coverage and latency improvement remain outside this proof.
This does not claim that the whole current runtime is byte-identical to
serving `61bd`, or relabel the measured result as a new run.
- The adopted upstream cache controls passed 3/3 with pinned real Turbo.
Forced work disables local and remote reads and writes; ordinary work
reuses local results. The original genuine-pnpm/Turbo controls remain
historical to `9060`'s earlier write-only policy. The duplicate cache
patch is superseded by #18230. Its qualification-only pnpm addition is
removed because the adopted upstream controls do not require it.
- The E2E typecheck, map checks and 277-control replay are carried from
the unchanged eval source paths. That replay passed, including the 183
Antigravity controls, catalog/connection checks and the separate
product-journey validator. The carried creation controls include 91
config/recovery cases. The final launcher suite passed 19/19, including
five real campaign finalization fault cases; the report suite passed
7/7. These final checks did not rerun the earlier 277-control group. The
canonical production-component browser spec passed in 27.4 s under its
unchanged 60 s limit before the replay. Four paused-composer cases and
the product base's build/typecheck plus 376 focused regressions were
verified earlier.
- The shipped wizard and actual API client cover persistence before
forwarding, lost response JSON, foreign/malformed requests, wrong
response identity/creator and cleanup-error preservation. Real
filesystem controls failed 5/5 before the writer repair and passed 5/5
afterward, preserving the old journal on partial-write, temporary-file
sync and rename faults. Three persistent-sync campaign controls failed
before the finalization repair and passed afterward. All five final
campaign fault cases preserve the primary failure, cleanup failure,
usage and failed report while attempting browser closure. The strict
journal still blocks the next mutation. These are provider-free
ownership controls; the Google task proof remains the original `9060` →
`61bd` acceptance.
- The decision restart check passed in the local 20-case fixture run. A
current-source real-PostgreSQL rollback control reproduced the exact
90,000 ms earlier global wake: the old equality rejected it, while the
exact durable expiry and new future-wake bound passed. The original 60 s
open-state, exact-timestamp, continuation and quiet checks remain. The
broader local run was **FAILED: 19 passed / 1 failed**, with a 15 s
timeout and a 30 s cleanup timeout in an unchanged timestamp-pagination
case. That case passed in canonical `c8b332` CI; the local timeout cause
remains inconclusive. An extra local server typecheck failed against
stale cached Runner declarations; it did not check this excluded test
file. Both limits remain recorded for fresh canonical CI.
- A broader local GitHub recovery group passed 21/22. Its unchanged
pagination case observed an unexpected config request; the log does not
establish the cause. That result remains retained, and fresh
current-head CI is the final broader gate.

- Exact delivery-head CI completed with 55 successes, two skips, and one
optional neutral review. Required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`, build,
typecheck, and Runner checks passed. Fresh Greptile is 5/5 with zero
unresolved threads. Optional Paperclip is neutral 4/5; its carried
recommendations are dispositioned against the public Stop contract and
selected live identity evidence.

Seven earlier converted attempts retain their failed grades and partial
evidence. Historical Paid8 and its later read-only per-run UI
observation remain separate from the fresh acceptance above. Unknown
prices and the older partial startup accounting remain explicit. Full
lineage and raw evidence remain private in the normal report bundle.

## Risks

- This case requires an authorized saved personal default Google
subscription and finite operator candidate admission. It does not test
fresh OAuth or establish global qualification.
- The physical observer supports a same-host loopback macOS ARM64
target. Cloud, Linux, and other models remain outside this case.
- A known-cost stop cannot cap missing prices or in-flight subscription
charges. Existing operator policies remain unchanged.
- Raw account/native identities stay private. Missing retirement proof
keeps resources retained. The selected cleanup mode does not test agent
purge.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex (GPT-6). The host did not expose the exact model revision
or context limit. The model used tools for code edits, tests, browser
automation, and review.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 19:51:32 -05:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip 1d571de5f9 Add shared native turn attribution boundaries (#18213)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages work performed by AI agents.
> - Native execution crosses the plugin worker, Runner, sidecar, and
durable event boundaries.
> - Existing outer spans leave repeated preparation and admission work
unattributed.
> - Optimizations need a common baseline with accurate ownership and
event meanings.
> - This change extends the existing opt-in tracing contract with
bounded timing receipts.
> - It preserves execution policy and keeps provider internals opaque
where the API provides no timing proof.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
Attribution of native task preparation, retained/cold Runner handoff,
and completion-to-text work.

**Current behavior**
Worker spans use a flat provider contract. Workspace calls lack a
consistent dispatch envelope. Submitted-to-started timing is named as a
provider queue even though it includes other work. The transport does
not expose a shared breakdown of its waits.

**Proposed improvement**
Add invocation-scoped nesting, bounded numeric remote receipts,
current-run transport timing, durable receipt intervals, and distinct
completion/text milestones. Reuse the existing exporter. No latency
optimization is included.

Related public work: #17842 consolidates existing startup tracing tests;
it does not add this runtime coverage.

## What Changed

- Extend the optional SDK tracer with nested async scopes and completed
timing receipts. Keep the host responsible for parent identity,
capability checks, attributes, clocks, depth, and count limits.
- Add dispatch and bounded host-read timings for environment and
workspace providers.
- Resolve transport parents on each call so retained sessions do not
retain an earlier run's trace.
- Split cold/resume/attach/prepare/registration/command/started-event
waits. Add opt-in numeric ACPX Runner/sidecar status and prompt-start
receipts.
- Distinguish first completion request, validated tool receipt, final
result commit, first nonempty text, and event persistence. Rename the
submitted-to-started interval to match its meaning.
- Link completed earlier remote lifecycles to their host-owned observer
rather than placing them under a later polling request. Preserve
sampling, timestamp limits and budgets.
- Document the versioned coverage map, causal clock limits, and baseline
acceptance requirements.

## Verification

- Current head: GitHub CI is fully green. Standard Greptile and Apex are
both 5/5, with no unresolved review threads. Full-suite validation was
performed in CI; follow-up local validation was limited to affected
packages and tests.

- Review follow-up: early rejection, missing provider capability and
startup-parent regressions were reproduced and fixed. The affected
worker/SDK/timing set passes 128 tests; 28 timing/context tests, SDK
typecheck and direct server TypeScript checking pass. The server
typecheck wrapper reached an unrelated Runner rebuild and stopped
because Cargo was absent from PATH; full Runner/image validation remains
in CI.

- CI failure accounting: the earlier Turbo cache/force conflict and
Linux OpenCode shell assertion were reproduced and diagnosed. A direct
proc probe ruled out permissions; a portable shell comparison identified
Bash skipping BASH_ENV with stripped SHLVL and socket stdin. Upstream
#18230 now supplies the CI and ignored-stdin fixture fixes; this PR
adopts them without duplicate CI changes. The strict Linux OOM assertion
passed before this source-equivalent merge.
- Retry follow-up: the three insertion/replay/failure timing cases and
server typecheck pass. The existing database regression now asserts a
single marker across identical result replay; the current-head CI
integration gate passes.
- Upstream CI alignment: all three real-Turbo 2.11.10 integration cases
pass. The repository policy gate rejected committing a generated
lockfile; the final PR contains no lockfile edit and uses the maintained
inline stale-lockfile recovery.
- Linked-lifecycle follow-up: 44 focused host/export tests pass (three
optional SDK-dependent cases skip); SDK and server typechecks pass. The
API contract test verifies an explicit root context, host-owned observer
link and unsampled suppression.
- SDK typecheck and focused worker/invocation tests: 30 passed,
including clock changes, bounded legacy IPC, and manual-span
creation-scope parentage.
- Focused reviewed host/native/transaction-boundary checks: 44 passed.
The 86-test worker-manager suite passes after updating its exact
assertions for the host-owned timing budget found by CI. Earlier
preparation/first-text checks also passed.
- Affected server and Runner TypeScript checks pass after building local
workspace declarations.
- Merge follow-up: the profile/candidate startup subset passes 94 tests,
the four Grok source-identity checks pass, and Runner TypeScript
checking passes. A subsequent execution-factory merge passes 21 focused
timing/trace tests and server TypeScript checking.
- Pinned Rust build and the ACPX Rust subset pass. The hostile receipt
projection test passes. Source profile compatibility checks: 127 passed,
one existing skip. Grok identity checks: four passed.
- Broad transport/ACPX suite: 410 passed after building all fake
provider binaries. Earlier attempts failed on missing
Runner/fake-provider outputs; building the required fixtures resolved
those failures.
- The first CI run correctly rejected stale source attestations. After
integrating current master, Grok advances 13→14 and Copilot 84→85;
master’s historical fixtures and Pi 35 stay byte-identical. Provider
dependencies, models and permission defaults are unchanged. Identity
generation/checks now pass.
- The added real-Postgres result lock regression could not initialize
its local embedded cluster. The insertion/replay/failure unit
regressions pass. The current-head CI integration gate passes.
- Comprehensive repository checks and image builds are delegated to CI,
as requested for this instrumentation pass. No deployment, model run,
collector-ingestion proof, or latency improvement is claimed.

## Risks

The new SDK methods are optional. Legacy span calls and endpoint-off
behavior remain supported. The host accepts only closed timing names and
bounded attributes. Remote durations are anchored at local receipt;
transport/scheduling uncertainty remains explicit. Trace trees have
count/depth limits. The first rollout must inspect actual collector
exports before treating the baseline as accepted. Fresh live
qualification for the new source identities remains a rollout
requirement. Revert these commits to remove the new measurements; no
schema migration is required.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and local code/tool
execution. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not
exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the enhancement
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal issue
details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Standard Greptile and Apex are both 5/5, with no unresolved
findings
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 17:45:56 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 54cc522e86 feat(runner): add gated native Antigravity ACP execution (#18188)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and their work.
> - Native Runner must bind each provider turn to the selected task,
account, model, and instructions.
> - Antigravity needs native ACP admission and physical process
ownership across continuation.
> - A saved conversation must not reuse an old process owner or silently
switch its effective model.
> - This pull request adds the native candidate behind exact operator
admission.
> - The default release gate remains closed while qualification is
pending.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Builds on merged #18187. Product account setup and the candidate
producer are in dependent #18189. The repeatable browser journey is in
#18190. Refs: #12503, #14938; those proposals use legacy CLI adapters.

**Agent or provider**

Google Antigravity ACP 1.4.3.

**Why this adapter is useful**

Users need to set up an Antigravity agent and run real work through
their managed Google subscription.

**How the agent is invoked**

Native Paperclip Runner uses the pinned Antigravity ACP runtime. Exact
operator admission is required while qualification remains pending.

## What Changed

- Add native Antigravity ACP model and instruction admission,
selected-account homes, and fenced refresh ownership.
- Carry exact candidate authority from the control plane through Runner,
Rust, the sidecar, and each current run. Clamp daemon lifetime to the
absolute permission expiry, including replacement owners.
- Preserve a rotated OAuth refresh token before later identity
verification can fail, including failed or cancelled startup admission.
Make private lease-close retries safe.
- Bound native probe retirement and retry the exact original owner; do
not delete credential homes before physical proof.
- Preserve Gemini API-key recovery when shared Google subscription
capability is added.
- Resume the same tagged native conversation with fresh per-turn process
ownership and physical native retirement.
- Include native manifests in isolated Rust image stages, release cache
keys, and dev rebuild detection. The workflow changes only extend
existing cache input lists.
- Keep current master provider behavior and append Grok 13, Pi 35, and
Copilot 84 input identities. Preserve prior identities, including saved
Copilot 82 and 83 runs.

## Verification

- Runner TypeScript main checks, profile generators, Rust formatting,
and offline workspace checks pass. The native backend integration target
passes 28 tests.
- The complete transport and cleanup group passes 387 tests without
unhandled rejections. These checks use local scripted children and
actual process and port ownership.
- Saved-profile decoding, native-execution parsing, installation, and
selected-credential controls pass 208 focused tests. All 109
pre-existing profile identity files remain byte-for-byte unchanged.
Copilot, Grok, and shared TypeScript/Rust generation checks pass.
- The final recovery fixture passes all seven cases. After the master
rebase, the combined recovery and owned-Node-runtime group passes all 10
cases. Each expiry case sets one 45-second absolute grant before
startup. It includes the deliberate six-second cold delay, four existing
eight-second command budgets, and active-turn headroom. The test proves
an active turn before expiry and then checks the daemon, owned process
group, child processes, and all three native port fences. The 60-second
test deadline does not renew provider authority.
- The consolidated model-discovery and pending-release group passes 22
tests. Google credential compatibility and auth recovery pass 25 tests,
including existing Gemini API-key recovery. The full product settings
test group remains intact in #18189.
- Earlier failures remain in their original CI runs and local records.
They exposed the Copilot 82 decoder gap, an expired five-second fixture
bootstrap ticket, and a fixture grant consumed before activation on
loaded CI. Each repair has a separate result. Production ticket limits
and admission behavior are unchanged by the final test commits.
- An unrelated decision-expiry check failed in [the earlier CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40941986698/job/123688668997).
Its owning code is unchanged from the base. The unchanged suite passes
20 tests on isolated PostgreSQL. A controlled database rollback
reproduces the earlier wake: clean startup schedules the 120-second
decision expiry, while rollback reconciliation leaves a 30-second
continuation-coalescing wake. The decision stays open, with no wake
delivery or error. The fresh final-head server shard passes; the failed
result is preserved.
- Final native commit `ec6bc7e4d77f5ae0cc4946dbba6c662e95a87f5b` passed
`ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`. Fresh Greptile and Paperclip reviews both
score 5/5, with no open findings. Antigravity retains the recorded
native `.5` closure and exact low-model profile. This PR does not claim
global or cross-platform qualification.

## Risks

- The new transport carries private managed credentials. Exact
ownership, account generation, model, instructions, and native
retirement are fail-closed.
- Only local macOS ARM64 has a verified complete Antigravity runtime.
Default Antigravity task execution remains disabled without current
trusted operator admission. The Google server sign-in lane and
production candidate producer ship in #18189; this native slice does not
expose the subscription catalog choice.
- Shared launch inputs change provider identities. New identities are
append-only; existing recorded identities remain available.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex (GPT-6). The host did not expose the exact model revision
or context limit. The model used tools for code edits, tests, and
review.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 16:36:12 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip d2c7edda16 test(runner): own Node executable in ACPX recovery fixtures (#18196)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and controls their work.
> - The runner recovery tests check durable ACPX session ownership.
> - The runner must reject a qualified executable that other users can
write.
> - The recovery fixture passes the shared host Node executable to that
guard.
> - A hosted CI job rejected the fixture before it opened a session.
> - This pull request gives the fixture its own Node copy with safe
permissions.
> - The recovery tests can then check recovery without changing the
production guard.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #18185, #14529.

**What happened?**

The Runner vitest 2/2 job in [run
40928584358](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40928584358/job/123645695206)
failed five ACPX controller recovery tests. Each test failed at
`session.open` with `qualified ACPX must not be group- or
world-writable`. The assertion did not retain the failing artifact path
or mode. The fixture passes `process.execPath` as its command and digest
source.

**Expected behavior**

A test must supply an owned executable with the permissions that the
production guard requires. It must not change the shared host executable
or weaken the guard.

**Steps to reproduce**

Run `acpx-controller-recovery.test.ts` on a host where the shared Node
executable permits group writes. The remote job above retains the actual
failure. Local validation in this PR does not execute the controller or
compile Rust.

## What Changed

- Extract the existing Node and Homebrew `libnode` copy logic into a
test-support helper.
- Use that helper in the existing native distribution fixture.
- Use an owned Node copy for the recovery descriptor, qualified command
and command digest.
- Add filesystem checks for copied bytes, permissions, library selection
and unchanged source files.
- Ignore only a missing adjacent library directory. Report other read
errors with the directory and original cause.

## Verification

- Three filesystem-only Vitest tests passed. They use synthetic writable
artifacts and copy the actual host Node bytes without executing them.
- TypeScript no-emit passed for the new helper and its pure test.
- The new real-filesystem `ENOTDIR` control fails against the first PR
head and passes after the review fix. The parent returned an incomplete
closure; the successor rejects it during preparation.
- `git diff --check` passed.
- The first-head Build job failed in the public npm consumer check with
`ETARGET` for `@aws-sdk/credential-provider-web-identity@^3.972.85`. A
later single exact-version official registry metadata request returned
HTTP 200 for `3.972.85`. This preserves the original failure and does
not establish its cause. No dependency version or check was changed. The
source review fix will receive normal fresh-head CI.
- The first local test configuration had an import error. The first
typecheck invocations had configuration and type-path errors. Corrected
invocations passed; those setup failures are retained in the source
receipt.
- On the reviewed successor, remote Build passed and all five ACPX
controller recovery tests passed. The other runner shard failed because
the new real-Node Buffer deep-equality assertion exhausted its worker
heap. The one-line follow-up uses native Buffer byte equality and keeps
the same invariant. Its three filesystem controls and scoped typecheck
pass; latest-head normal CI remains required.
- Final head `1939f41a7e9cb4031acdf8e99df431b81f28ba03`: both required
checks (`ci / verify`, `ci / e2e`) pass. Remote tests confirm 5 recovery
tests, 33 native distribution tests and all 3 owned-Node tests pass.
Greptile is 5/5 with no open review threads.
- A server queue test timed out at 15 seconds on this head. Its actual
CI checkout has identical server and dependency sources to the prior
passing checkout. One authorized failed-only replay passed at the same
checkout: all 105 files and 2,270 tests passed. The specific test took
5.23 seconds. Passing Build and runner jobs were carried forward. The
original timeout remains retained; this does not establish its cause.
- The actual recovery and native distribution tests, full typecheck,
build and full suite were not run locally. Those tests can compile or
execute native runtime code. Normal PR CI must verify them before
delivery.

## Risks

- Moving the existing fixture copy logic could affect platform-specific
Node library loading. The helper retains the existing Homebrew library
rule and permission modes. Remote CI remains required.
- This change does not prove which artifact mode caused the retained CI
failure. It removes the fixture's dependence on shared host executable
permissions.
- Production code, dependency versions, timeouts, retries, workflows and
writable-artifact guards are unchanged.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with source inspection and code tools. The
exact serving model identifier and context window are not exposed in
this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 14:57:08 -05:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip 27be859044 Record runtime activity under Runner authority (#18050)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and tasks.
> - Runner owns each authenticated run and its provider process.
> - Runtime clients need to report successful activity in that run.
> - A retained process can outlive a run, so an operation needs current
authority.
> - This PR captures that authority before the operation and records
activity afterward.
> - Core can consume the event through the existing run stream.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Builds on merged #18129 and targets master. The dependent consumer is
#18131.
Test stability fixes were separated into merged #18128. Earlier
combined-head
verification remains in [the
archive](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18050#issuecomment-6489369676).

**Subsystem affected**

Runner activity recording and provider command environments.

**Problem or motivation**

A retained provider process can complete an operation after its original
run ends.
Runtime clients need a host-attributed event and a helper that works
inside the
provider sandbox.

**Proposed solution**

Capture opaque Runner context before use. Publish a structured
notification after
success. Runner checks current authority and records
`runtime.activity.recorded`.

## What Changed

- Add `notification-context` and `record-activity CONTEXT NAMESPACE
ACTIVITY_KEY`.
Rotate context on warm attachment and process recovery. Accept no caller
run ID.
- Use one private named pipe. Reuse Runner's bounded JSON-line reader.
Serialize
concurrent publishers with a read-only lock. A blocking reader queues at
most
  128 records; the existing control loop handles at most 16 per pass.
- Grant Codex access to the exact helper, descriptor, lock and pipe.
Preserve
other filesystem and network limits. Preserve host discovery values
through
provider launch boundaries and reject configured-environment overrides.
- Update source identities to Pi 34, Copilot 81 and Grok 12. Keep
historical
  identity fixtures and recovery behavior.

## Verification

- Targeted release notification and sandbox-policy tests: seven passed.
They cover
run rotation, recovery, Unicode limits, concurrent writers, malformed
and partial
  records, bounded queues, failed persistence and fixed-path cleanup.
- Real CLI integration and pinned Codex 0.160.0 sandbox checks: passed.
The sandbox check uses no model, credential or network call. It verifies
activity
recording while unrelated state reads and parent-directory writes remain
denied.
- ACPX profile generator check, formatting and diff checks: passed.
- Rebased onto master `31b927e30` at head `64d0248a8`. Master used the
same profile versions, so the resolution preserves its Pi 33, Copilot 79
and Grok 11 fixtures byte-for-byte and creates new identities. All
identity checks pass. Five targeted provider/environment/recovery files
pass 168 tests with one existing skip; the Rust Pi admission regression
passes. The notification module and Codex sandbox implementation are
byte-identical to the tested pipe head `671373fe0`.
- Removed the mailbox traversal reported by security review. Its
regression replaces
the pipe path with a 100-level tree and an unreadable leaf. Shutdown
preserves the
leaf, performs no traversal and completes promptly, including with a
partial record.
- An initial targeted test failed because its run-rotation fixture
updated config
without updating durable state. The corrected fixture passes. Runner
also rejects
  inconsistent run bindings.
- Previous head `26abbf62b` passed Runner, build and browser CI. Server
shard 11/12
failed in unchanged `attention-service.test.ts`: cleanup/test timeouts
were followed
by a duplicate `ATQ` fixture key. The final head needs fresh CI and
review.
- CI on `64d0248a8` completed with 52 successful checks and four
intentional skips. Runner Vitest shard 1/2 failed when retained-state
copies encountered the live FIFO; the aggregate also failed. Standard
review scored 4/5 and found relative pipe paths plus late context
publication. Follow-up `5c3f14d32` places IPC in a private canonical
temporary directory and publishes context before welcome commands. Its
relative-state CLI test, two authenticated reconnect cases, seven
notification/policy cases and real Codex sandbox pass. One affected
retained-settlement case passes with the matching release binary; the
other 18 cases remain for CI. The sandbox denies sibling-directory and
lock writes. All build, test and security checks pass on `5c3f14d32`;
standard review is 5/5 with no unresolved threads. The requested Apex
review is 5/5 on this exact head, with no findings or unresolved
threads.
- Earlier broad test results in the archive apply to their recorded
source revisions.
Per the requested workflow, final local checks stay targeted; GitHub CI
supplies
  broad coverage.

- After Apex completed, master advanced again and conflicted on Copilot
identity. Head `e94a9359d` is rebased on master `8ac5a128e`; it
preserves the published Copilot 80 fixture and uses Copilot 81. The
notification module, Codex sandbox and durable control-loop code are
byte-identical to Apex-reviewed `5c3f14d32`. All 131 targeted
installation/compatibility/recovery cases and identity generator checks
pass. All 55 checks pass with four intentional skips on the rebased
head. Standard review is 5/5 with no unresolved threads. Apex is 5/5 on
`e94a9359d`, with zero findings and no unresolved threads. GitHub
confirms this head is conflict-free and ready for review.

## Risks

Activity remains an optional hint and grants no access. A successful
helper exit
means publication to the pipe; Runner persists accepted events through
its existing
durable outbox. Full queues, unavailable helpers or failed writes can
drop a hint
without failing the operation. Context reads are local and do not wait
for the
control loop. Publishers have a 500 ms lock deadline and a 2 KiB record
limit.
IPC lives outside durable state. Idle transport blocks; cleanup removes
its fixed files and empty private directory. The host must provide
`/usr/bin/mkfifo`. Rebuild matching Runner/provider artifacts for the
updated source
identities. No dependency, migration, live provider call or deployment
is included.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools and code
execution.
The exact serving snapshot is not exposed.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 07:40:50 -07:00
4c56702e06 fix(server): schedule retained native-session cleanup (#17717)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native runs can retain a local session after an interrupted durable
suspend.
> - The orphan reaper repeatedly scans completed history for that
cleanup duty.
> - Idle scans keep the database active. Removing them requires complete
wake and ownership paths.
> - This pull request moves retained-session cleanup to committed
signals, local release events and saved deadlines.
> - Existing physical proof checks still decide whether cleanup is safe.
The shared scheduler does not grant execution authority.
> - The benefit is quiet retained history with recoverable cleanup and
owned shutdown.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #17709 and #18135. This is slice 51 of the existing
recurring-server sleep stack. Both referenced dependencies have merged.
The target is `master`.

**What happened?**

The periodic orphan pass scans retained native sessions even after their
cleanup is complete or no automatic action is safe. Some eligible
sessions also depend on a local session, environment lease or original
maintenance callback releasing ownership. An earlier decision
notification can be consumed before the run's later terminal projection
commits.

**Expected behavior**

Reconstruct existing work at startup. Wake from committed writes and
actual owner release. Register the saved claim expiry or a probe for a
specific live process. Stop recurring discovery when no obligation
remains. Preserve original callback ownership and all existing cleanup
proof checks.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Retain completed native runs with a durable-suspend close failure.
2. Let the periodic orphan pass run with no new work.
3. Observe repeated cleanup discovery. Separately, delay terminal
projection after its decision notification is consumed and observe the
missing cleanup wake.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Parent #17709 at reviewed head
`3b75f4bc1da1370304f069fc287af3d693575716`, landed as
`df6156c2e37f542a69f393dde31e357b82b7cac1`. Current integrated master:
`31b927e3013a8a4b3266854b740cf40a24753788`.

## What Changed

- Move scoped, paged discovery to the retained cleanup owner. Preserve
explicit manual recovery.
- Register the duty with the shared scheduler and remove it from the
periodic orphan pass. Keep concrete lease expiry and live-process probe
obligations.
- Use typed outcomes for settled/refused work and process, session,
environment, maintenance or lease waits. Keep physical proof and
quarantine decisions in the executor.
- Wake from committed finalization and terminal projection writes,
durable process/lease release, and local session or callback settlement.
Routine company-only finalization hints leave dormant cleanup quiet.
- Join duplicate cleanup and serialize inspections on one database lane.
Keep original Runner callbacks owned until settlement and shutdown.
- Preserve all master profile fixtures and the branch's historical
identities. Save the colliding sleep profile 79 separately. Generate
combined Copilot profile 80 from its source and retain master's other
provider profiles.
- Add the owner audit and regression coverage. No new table, migration
or independent maintenance timer is added.

## Verification

- Server acceptance: **2,342 distinct passing cases in 18 complete
files**. The 14-file unaffected group contributes 1,532 passes. Full
startup contributes 76, process recovery 410, environment service 51,
and external-chat response 273. The 29-case cleanup worker suite and
977-case executor suite run in full. No case in these files is skipped.
- Controlled scope regression: removing only the ordinary finalization
issue/run guard wakes dormant retained cleanup; the same assertion
passes after restoring it. A real local owner release still resumes the
durable candidate.
- Preserve the first broad failure: 1,607 passed and one startup
shutdown case failed because the coordinator mock lacked `stop()`. Add
only that mock method. All 76 unchanged startup cases then pass. Do not
treat the first broad command as green.
- Dedicated PostgreSQL 17 databases use the existing migration 413
schema. Embedded-only fixtures use the existing recovery helper with
fresh per-call databases. All temporary imports are restored byte-exact.
No assertion or timeout is relaxed.
- Current-master integration preserves both complete source histories.
The server, UI and database trees are identical to the server-tested
source. All master historical profile fixtures remain byte-exact. The
prepared sleep profile 79 remains independently inspectable.
- Current runtime validation at
`d08f764e3efe75e96929173afe7ee8739121ad9f` passes all 12 commands (22
installed ACPX/Grok contract cases and 26 native-provider Rust cases):
`pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts`; Copilot/Grok identity
and generated profile checks; Runner and server typechecking; server
build; Copilot/Pi installation, profile compatibility and transport
settlement files (130 passed; one opt-in closed Pi snapshot case skipped
because its distribution root is not configured); installed ACPX
model/reconnect package contract and Grok identity tests; Rust
native-provider backend tests; module boundaries and migration order.
- Earlier 94-case installation/settlement acceptance applies to the
prepared profile 79 source. It is retained as history and does not
substitute for the current profile 80 validation above.
- Failure history and duty-specific evidence remain in
`doc/plans/2026-10-26-retained-native-session-cleanup-sleep-audit.md`.
Exact-current-head acceptance: all 60 checks are clean, including
protected CI and security; Greptile gives 5/5 for
`281d579de0d08e907194b8b790a0597b07d16b7b` with no actionable findings.
No Ponytail review is present under the authorized missing-review
policy.
- These checks do not claim a full local repository suite, live Copilot
or Daytona qualification, deployed host/database suspension, or measured
cost savings.

## Risks

- Missing a supported producer could strand cleanup. Tests exercise real
finalizer, heartbeat, environment and process writers. Process-local
signals cover in-process writers; no multi-replica or external SQL
notification transport is added.
- A timeout can leave an original callback active. Cleanup and shutdown
must keep waiting for it. The existing global maintenance drain is
conservative across roots.
- A retained live process still has a scoped 30-second absence probe. A
saved lease keeps its actual deadline. Operational errors retain retry
work. Immutable proof refusals and operator-required histories do not
gain automatic retry authority.
- Cleanup keeps all existing artifact, identity, claim, no-launch and
quarantine checks. Terminal status alone does not authorize physical
cleanup.
- This PR does not expand Cloud alarm coverage or relax host sleep
eligibility. It proves worker behavior, not deployed app/database
suspension.
- The Copilot source identity has changed; these checks do not claim new
live provider qualification.
- The parent has merged. This PR is merged only after its current-head
protected CI and review gates pass under the existing campaign
authorization.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with code execution and repository tools.
The exact serving variant and context-window size are not exposed in
this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-10-29 04:24:57 -05:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip aa75ec9d56 Replay Claude native options on ACP reconnect (#18135)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and their task execution.
> - Runner uses ACPX to connect to Claude sessions.
> - Claude receives native options when ACPX creates a session.
> - ACPX omits those options when it loads or resumes the same session.
> - A reconnect can lose allowed tools, instructions, and settings
sources.
> - This pull request replays the existing options through the existing
Claude metadata contract.
> - Resumed tasks keep the configuration admitted for their session.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**
A Claude task can complete its first turn and then fail on a warm
follow-up. The provider refuses an internal completion tool because
`session/load` omits the `allowedTools` options sent with `session/new`.
The same omission exists on `session/resume`.

**Expected behavior**
Creation, load, and resume must supply the same caller-selected native
session options. The existing policy for native user settings must stay
unchanged.

**Steps to reproduce**
Create a persistent Claude ACP session with an explicit allowed-tool
list and appended instructions. Complete a turn, close its connection,
and reconnect to the saved session. Inspect the ACP request. Before this
change, the reconnect has no `_meta` field.

**Paperclip version or commit**
Reproduced on Runner source `e8b78cce5bb557b086bee9ca930eeaab1d09b244`.
The offline protocol regression also fails on the current base
`80a2b9284bf189e93ca4313085814548f48b8dc8`.

Related: #18089 added prepared harness storage. #11798 concerns the
separate legacy adapter and does not fix Runner reconnect metadata.

## Upstream status and backport scope

ACPX [0.21.1](https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/releases/tag/v0.21.1)
already replays session metadata on load and resume in its [released
client
implementation](https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/blob/v0.21.1/src/acp/client.ts).
This PR backports that behavior to the currently qualified 0.13.1
integration.

The released 0.21.1 runtime does not expose equivalents for all hooks
used by Runner's existing patch: verified executable spawning,
synchronous protocol admission guards, provider extension dispatch, and
response-delivery receipts. Upgrading requires a compatibility pass that
preserves these guarantees and removes local changes already covered
upstream. This backport does not add a new Paperclip-specific dependency
contract.

## What Changed

- Replay existing Claude native options on `session/load` and
`session/resume` through the same metadata builder used at creation.
Other providers keep their existing reconnect requests.
- Test both reconnect methods against the installed ACPX manager and a
local ACP wire fixture. Cover allowed tools, model, turn limit,
instructions, and both existing settings-source modes.
- Update exact source attestations and generated profile declarations
required by the shared ACPX patch. Keep historical fixtures unchanged.
- Document the reconnect contract. No new home mode, plugin policy, or
provider permission rule is added.

## Verification

- Confirmed the new load and resume tests fail before the patch because
metadata is absent.
- Applied the canonical patch to pristine package bytes and confirmed it
matches the tested runtime.
- Targeted installed-package model-selection and reconnect suite plus
changed Grok identity tests: 22 passed.
- Rechecked the four new reconnect cases against the cleanly applied
patch, with explicit expected values for all supplied options.
- Three targeted current-profile and revision-boundary assertions pass
locally. Updated the native Pi test digest; native compilation and
execution remain in CI.
- Maintained profile generators pass their consistency checks.
- GitHub CI is green, including typecheck, native Runner checks, package
contracts, packaged installation, build, and server/browser suites. One
unrelated server database-cleanup timeout passed on the bounded
failed-job rerun. No comprehensive local suite was run. Live
post-deployment acceptance remains pending.

## Risks

Claude reconnects now receive the same native settings sources and
options as creation. This corrects configuration loss without changing
caller policy. The shared dependency patch requires new source
identities for other attested profiles; their reconnect behavior is
unchanged. No database migration is required.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with code and tool use. Exact deployment ID
and context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 01:45:18 -07:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip 80a2b9284b Define durable runtime activity events (#18129)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and tasks.
> - Runner reports durable run events through PRP.
> - Runtime clients need a typed record of reported activity.
> - The event must keep the normal run authority and read boundaries.
> - This pull request adds the generic runtime activity event contract.
> - Later PRs can publish and consume this contract without private
plugin coupling.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

First feature prerequisite extracted from #18050. Runner publishing is
#18050; the dependent consumer is #18131. Related independent test
stability work: #18128. The parent search and review history is
preserved in [the verification
archive](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18050#issuecomment-6489369676).

**Subsystem affected**

Runner event protocol, server run-event persistence and redaction, and
UI event taxonomy.

**Problem or motivation**

Core needs a durable, typed activity record tied to the authenticated
run. A text marker is not an event contract.

**Proposed solution**

Add `runtime.activity.recorded` as a P1 event with a closed `{
namespace, activityKey }` payload. Runner knows no plugin or panel
identity. Run/session identity, sequence and emission time stay in the
outer envelope; Core resolves company, task and agent through the
authorized run binding. Use the existing authenticated persistence,
acknowledgement, replay and redaction paths.

## What Changed

- Define and validate the event in PRP v1, v2 and v3. Update the
generated protocol artifacts and event catalog.
- Preserve saved and live event redaction. Test persistence, replay
deduplication and the existing run-read boundary.
- Register the event in the UI taxonomy without changing panel display
behavior.
- Advance the source-bound Copilot identity to 78. Retain all published
historical identity fixtures without changing their bytes.

## Verification

- Root `pnpm typecheck` and `pnpm build`: passed for the revised
activity contract.
- Node protocol checks: 14 passed. Provider identity and registry tests:
185 passed. Server tests: 103 passed. UI event registry: five passed.
- Maintained Grok and Copilot identity generator checks and `git diff
--check`: passed.
- The first activity-contract review scored 4/5 because the dependent
producer and readers still used the earlier contract. Both dependent PRs
are now updated and restacked; the finding is resolved and review is
running again.
- Initial extraction retained a consumer-only import in one server
suite. That suite failed to load. The consumer case and import were
moved out; the final three server files passed all 103 cases.
- Earlier panel-specific head `6137c50bc` had green CI and standard/Apex
5/5. Those scores do not qualify this revised activity contract. Fresh
CI and reviews are pending. Earlier combined results in the archive
apply only to their recorded source revisions.

## Risks

This change is additive. It adds no route, publisher, filesystem
transport, provider sandbox grant, or panel display behavior. Activation
hints grant no permission to read a plugin view. Provider identities
bind the changed protocol source; historical identities remain
decode-only. No schema migration or dependency change is required.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools and code
execution. The exact serving snapshot is not exposed.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 00:32:12 -07:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip c57af3c564 Reuse prepared Runner storage and installed skill selections (#18089)
<!-- entire-trail-link-start -->
https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/-/trails/207/changes/paperclip/207
<!-- entire-trail-link-end -->

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - The native Runner prepares selected skills, instructions, and
provider storage.
> - Repeated preparation imports the company skill inventory and
rebuilds Claude storage.
> - Execution environments can already maintain prepared resources.
> - This pull request lets them reuse account storage while Core keeps
execution policy.
> - New retry runs resolve current skills and keep the failed attempt's
history.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

Native Runner preparation and retry skill selection.

**Current behavior**

Explicit installed selections still trigger company inventory
reconciliation. Plugin preparation receives account identity only on
warm transitions. Claude's isolated mode requires a session-specific
configuration directory.

**Proposed behavior**

Skip inventory imports when explicit selections are installed, while
retaining current authorization and version resolution. Send account
identity on initial preparation. Allow an execution environment to
provide persistent Claude storage without enabling preconfigured
permission behavior. A new retry resolves current skill assignments.

**Reason and benefit**

Remove repeated preparation work without adding environment-specific
policy to Core. Related: #13984 describes a similar storage-lifetime
problem in the separate claude_local adapter; this PR does not change
that adapter.

## What Changed

- Derive Claude’s configuration path from the single authoritative
prepared-storage input; separately supplied CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR values are
overridden.
- Add an explicit prepared Claude storage binding, forward it to the
sidecar, and retain recovery and provider lifetime fencing.
- Refresh Core-owned Claude settings after acquiring the lifetime lease.
Reuse environment-prepared skills.
- Reuse installed explicit skill selections and preserve
missing-selection initialization and current access checks.
- Reserve the prepared-home marker for environment provisioning; task
overrides are rejected and configured bindings are stripped before
native launch.
- Clear inherited skill selection snapshots on new retries. Keep
admitted execution recovery and failed attempt metadata.

## Verification

- Current single-input follow-up `8dbc2f6ec`: 154 focused Runner checks
pass with one existing skip; four Grok identity checks and four Pi
packaged-probe checks pass. Shared immutable source identities advance
to Grok10/Pi32/Copilot74. All56 current-head CI checks pass (four
intentionally skipped); standard and enhanced reviews are both5/5 with
no unresolved threads.
- Focused Runner sandbox tests: 29 passed. Focused environment tests: 16
passed.
- company-skills-empty-runtime: 10 passed.
- Plugin Runner and runtime selection database tests were attempted.
Local execution is blocked because embedded PostgreSQL cannot load
libzstd.1.dylib; these checks remain for CI.
- New database regressions cover installed-selection reuse, initial
account preparation, and retry snapshot removal.
- Prepared-home trust-boundary regressions: 4 targeted checks passed
(task schema, all env binding scopes, native executor).
- Focused Pi public-install probe checks: 4 passed. The build smoke
probe now asserts the current Pi 32 profile and exact digest.
- CI found and fixed retry-context TypeScript inference, stale Pi
identity fixtures, Docker source identity inputs, and the
skill-observability test’s old assumption that every selection imports
inventory. Cold and reused selection coverage remain.
- CI chat shard 2 initially failed three GitHub/Discord idle-database
assertions. An unchanged-head rerun passed; the original cause remains
unexplained.
- Runtime head `f5b53679a` passes all 56 current CI checks (four jobs
intentionally skipped), including the full build/public-install probe,
TypeScript, Rust, Runner and server matrices. Greptile is 5/5 with no
unresolved review threads.
- The requested enhanced review scored 5/5 on `f5b53679a`, with one
nonblocking documentation request. Documentation follow-up `1ac5d26a8`
adds only the documented existing ownership/0700 requirement; the thread
is resolved and all 56 current-head checks pass (four intentionally
skipped). The subsequent single-input runtime follow-up8dbc2f6ec
repeated the complete CI → standard5/5 → enhanced5/5 cycle successfully.
- Broader verification is delegated to GitHub CI as requested. The
initial policy check rejected a generated lockfile repair; that change
was removed because Core CI already resolves stale importer entries.

## Risks

Prepared storage must be provisioned by the execution environment before
launch. It is not credential isolation. Core replaces managed Claude
settings under the existing provider lease. No new per-run harness homes
are created by this option. New retries may select a newer skill
version; recovery of an already admitted provider execution keeps its
saved input.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and tool use. The exact model
revision is not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
related context above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change
- [x] I have run focused local tests; database and full verification
remain for CI as explained above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented risks
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-28 17:09:24 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 356c7de9b7 fix(runner): bind Grok packs to current admission source (#17972)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and their work.
> - Native agents use verified Runner and provider-pack artifacts.
> - A protected installed pack can be reused when its selected provider
profile matches.
> - Grok kept profile 1 when its sidecar gained effort, search, and
startup diagnostics.
> - An older Grok sidecar can therefore pass compatibility and reject
the new session fields before provider startup.
> - This PR binds the current Grok profile to its admission source so a
fresh run selects the current verified pack.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #17922, #17942, #17962. Related installation contract: #14024. No
duplicate repair was found.

**What happened?**

The selected Grok profile digest stayed unchanged across native session
contract changes. The installed-pack verifier correctly compared that
digest, but the unchanged value let a pre-effort sidecar satisfy a
current controller. That old parser rejects `grokEffort` and
`grokDisableWebSearch` before the new startup diagnostics run.

**Expected behavior**

A fresh Grok run must use a pack that supports its current session
contract. Source-only app changes must still permit warm reuse when the
selected Grok profile matches. Reattachment must keep its exact admitted
artifact authority.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Retain a protected pack with published Grok profile 1 and ACPX
interface 1.
2. Upgrade the controller to the native effort and search contract.
3. Start Grok 4.7 with High effort and disabled web search.
4. The old profile passes installed-pack compatibility, but its sidecar
rejects the new fields.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced from master at `09ad9adce2cf4742944353a3707a2f908e9bb35e`.

## What Changed

- Advance Grok to profile 7. Keep historical versions 1–6 decodable and
keep the Grok 1.0.13 runtime pin.
- Stamp the Grok admission source identity into a generated launcher
comment. Keep the existing physical command-byte digest check unchanged.
Bind effort/search/credential handling, sidecar admission, and Rust
backend/session/diagnostic source.
- Check the source attestation in the existing TypeScript/Rust profile
build gate. Keep its required fixture in the Docker context. Refuse to
overwrite a versioned identity after source changes.
- Add regression coverage for rejecting the old pack, current-profile
warm reuse, exact historical recovery authority, and actual sidecar
dispatch of Grok 4.7 High with both search policies.
- Re-attest Copilot as profile 71 because its bound shared recovery
decoder now retains Grok 6. Preserve Copilot 70 and all earlier
identities. Keep the compatibility algorithm, other provider identities,
dependencies, lockfile, and workflows unchanged.

## Verification

- The production installed-pack regression failed before the profile
update: the old Grok pack was accepted. It now passes.
- 105 server manifest, artifact, archive, and authority tests passed.
- 246 Runner profile, physical launcher integrity, Grok
effort/search/credential, and actual sidecar process tests passed; six
existing platform cases were skipped.
- 31 Node packaging and identity tests passed, including an actual
generator CLI regression that preserves all authority files when a
versioned identity would change.
- 55 Rust ACPX unit tests and 17 real sidecar pipe tests passed. After
the final profile declaration, all 55 unit checks passed again.
- Final `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed at the final source.
- CI on the preceding head caught Copilot’s stale attestation for the
shared recovery decoder. The same current-source test failed locally,
then passed after profile 71 was generated with version 70 retained. All
106 affected Copilot/profile checks pass. Final head
`78e6d76fc52f492371e15574482b3641735a6d89` passed the full CI workflow;
the failed prior job log is retained.
- Review follow-up: mutating the Rust backend’s actual Grok descriptor
field left the prior identity unchanged. This regression failed before
binding `acpx_provider_backend.rs` and passes afterward. Profile 7
retains the prior versioned fixture and recovery decoder. All 179
affected Runner checks and 75 focused server pack/manifest checks passed
after this change.
- `pnpm test:run` hit the recorded embedded PostgreSQL bootstrap failure
after five attempts. The full run also exposed a current-release fixture
with the historical Grok digest; it now reads the current profile. Its
11 focused manifest tests now pass. The failed local run log is
retained; final exact-head CI passed.
- The same filtered-context Docker build that failed CI now passes
locally after adding its required source fixture.
- A separate probe used the built sidecar in a private HOME with no
credentials. It admitted the current profile and the new Grok fields,
then returned the closed working-directory rejection before provider
launch or inference.
- A historical parser probe reproduced the pre-effort sidecar rejection.
These probes establish the contract boundary; they do not establish
native subscription task acceptance.
- Initial restricted local ownership tests failed because loopback
listeners were denied. The same tests passed with loopback access. One
new dispatcher fixture first lacked required instructions; the completed
request passed. These setup failures are retained in local evidence.
- Live native task acceptance remains pending deployment. Earlier
deployed attempts failed before tool output. No successful native shell
proof is claimed.

- Final exact-head merge gate: all 62 contexts are clean (57 success,
four intentional skips, one informational neutral formal review).
Greptile and Paperclip reviews are both 5/5, with no unresolved
actionable threads. The formal review uses the existing report-only
neutral policy.

## Risks

- The first fresh Grok run after upgrade may need to stage the current
provider pack. Matching current profiles keep their existing reuse path.
- Fresh admission rejects older Grok profile identities. Historical
decoding and exact reattachment authority remain separate; this change
does not reinterpret an old identity or replace an active session's
pack.
- Future changes to bound source require a new Grok profile attestation.
The build gate fails if the checked-in identity is stale.
- Model, effort, search, credential, approval, and retry policy are
unchanged.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code
execution. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not
exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks; full-suite
database failure is retained above)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-28 07:15:13 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 0d22e27dc4 fix(runner): preserve closed native startup diagnostics (#17962)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip runs agents through a controlled execution boundary.
> - Native Runner starts ACPX providers through a TypeScript sidecar and
a Rust transport.
> - That transport hides arbitrary provider messages because they can
contain credentials.
> - Grok admission failures currently have no stable code. Other startup
failures can also lose their owning stage.
> - A real native startup failure therefore reports only
`classification=unclassified`, even when the ordinary subscription hello
test succeeds.
> - This pull request preserves fixed failure categories without
forwarding provider text or changing admission policy.
> - The benefit is a useful next diagnostic result before another
functional repair or retry.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #17922 and #17942.

**What happened?**

A native Grok session failed before its first tool. Runner assets passed
verification. The Rust rejection discarded the cause because only closed
error codes may cross that boundary. The existing admission guard used
plain errors. Startup errors outside that guard could also lose their
stage.

**Expected behavior**

Report a fixed Grok admission reason, or a fixed startup stage when no
known error code exists. Keep credentials, provider messages, session
IDs, and paths out of the classification. Keep the failure and cleanup
effective.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Have a Grok ACP fixture return a session without its native effort
acknowledgement.
2. Start it through the real ACPX client and pass the failure through
the sidecar classifier.
3. Before this change, the result is `acpx_sidecar_command_failed`. Rust
reduces that to `unclassified`.
4. The same loss occurs for injected sandbox, credential, and runtime
admission failures.

## What Changed

- Give Grok effort admission errors fixed codes for missing
acknowledgement, model or effort mismatch, session mismatch, conflicting
configuration, drift, and invalid protocol use.
- Record closed host startup stages in a private weak map. Preserve the
original error object, cancellation, and resource cleanup.
- Prefer existing known error codes over a fallback stage. Ignore
arbitrary provider-supplied stage properties and messages.
- Map only exact new codes to Rust diagnostic categories. Add real
ACPX-client and sidecar-pipe regressions with secret canaries and
unknown-code controls.
- Bind the changed shared source and new diagnostic modules in Copilot
profile 70. Preserve profile 69 and earlier history.
- Document the diagnostic contract. There are no dependency, lockfile,
workflow, auth, model, permission, or retry-policy changes.

## Verification

- Red before the production change: four TypeScript cases lost the
native reason or host stage. A Rust case returned `unclassified` for the
new closed categories.
- Final focused checks: 320 tests passed: 241 across sidecar
classification, Grok admission, the real ACPX client, recovery, runtime
adapter, and Copilot installation; all 79 host integration tests also
passed in isolation. These include nine startup-stage cases, translated
errors, actual missing Pi skill materialization, missing Copilot/Cursor
credentials, and a missing workspace binding.
- Review follow-up: a translated Copilot rejection lost its stage, and a
real Pi skill-loading failure reported configuration. Both regressions
failed before the two-line repair and pass afterward. Stage recording
now follows provider translation and starts before Pi skill acquisition.
The current unpublished Copilot 70 identity was regenerated.
- Formal review follow-up: missing Copilot and Cursor credentials
reported configuration. Both cases failed before the two-line stage
repair and pass afterward. A missing-workspace case also verifies the
separate binding catch.
- Seven Rust unit checks and 17 sidecar transport integration checks
passed. The pipe checks preserve known categories and reject unknown
suffixes without disclosing the provider message.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. Rust formatting and the
generated profile/source identity checks passed.
- Host integration history is retained: one complete 73-case host run
passed. Other batches hit credential-port ownership errors in different
existing cases; the four new stage regressions passed. The final 79-case
host run passed after the last review fix. The prior intermittent lease
failures remain recorded and are not claimed fixed here.
- `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped after repeated embedded
Postgres bootstrap failures. The same local database failure predates
this change. Full CI must pass before merge.
- A metadata-only probe with pinned Grok 1.0.13, private HOME, synthetic
credentials, a local catalog, and no inference passed fresh Grok
4.7/High admission and cold restore. This is supporting ABI evidence. It
does not prove live subscription execution.
- Initial CI history is retained: server shard 1 failed its unchanged
final rate-limit slot test (two requests allowed instead of one). No
server policy code changed here. The review follow-up requires fresh
full CI; this is not claimed fixed.
- Second CI history is retained: chat shard 2 failed the unchanged Slack
session-sync quiet-queue test (three selects during the quiet window).
The first rate-limit failure did not recur there. No chat or server
policy code changed in this PR. Final head
654bc5aa21 passed all 61 contexts (56
success, four intentional skips, one informational neutral review). Both
final-head reviews are 5/5 with no new findings; the Paperclip app
publishes its completed review as an informational neutral check.
- Live native acceptance is still pending. After deployment, retry the
original bounded task and inspect its actual shell output, exit status,
run result, and saved task state. This PR fixes the evidence gap; it
does not claim the startup incident is resolved.

## Risks

- Shared startup failures can now receive a stage category. The private
weak map cannot import provider-defined fields. Known error codes keep
priority.
- A category could point at the wrong stage. Tests inject failures at
the installation, sandbox, credential, and runtime boundaries. Existing
cancellation and cleanup tests remain in place.
- The Copilot profile identity changes because shared source changes.
Historical identities remain decodable and cannot authorize a current
launch.
- The next live failure may require another functional repair. Admission
remains closed until the requested configuration is verified.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code
execution. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not
exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks; full-suite
environment failures are recorded above)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 20:53:02 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 7a8df30953 fix(runner): admit Grok effort through native session metadata (#17942)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents for work.
> - Paperclip Runner must preserve each agent's model and thinking
effort.
> - The Grok migration in #17922 passes explicit effort to native
Runner.
> - The pinned Grok 1.0.13 CLI reports native session metadata instead
of standard ACP config options.
> - The standard effort guard rejects that valid session before the
first prompt.
> - This pull request binds model and effort on Grok session open and
verifies the native reply.
> - Restored sessions keep the selected effort instead of reverting to
Grok's default.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17922

**What happened?**
A migrated Grok 4.7 agent with High effort fails at native session.open
before it can run a tool. Grok 1.0.13 has no standard configOptions
response and rejects session/set_config_option. Its native session
metadata supports the requested model and effort. A cold load also
resets effort to High unless the request supplies it again. The upgrade
banner also calls Grok “Codex”.

**Expected behavior**
The native session must acknowledge the selected model and effort before
a prompt. A cold restore must preserve both values. The upgrade banner
must describe the selected harness accurately.

**Steps to reproduce**
1. Upgrade a Grok agent to Paperclip Runner with explicit High effort.
2. Assign a bounded shell task. The pre-fix native session fails during
admission.
3. For the restore case, create a Low native session, close the process,
and load it without effort metadata. The pinned CLI reports High.

**Paperclip version or commit**
Observed at f60ac29cf1 with Grok 1.0.13.

**Deployment mode**
Cloud, with the board operator interface.

## What Changed

- Project the bound model and effort into native Grok session/new,
session/load, and session/resume metadata before transport writes and
observation.
- Require a correlated native acknowledgement with the exact model,
effort, and session identity. Reject conflicting metadata, selection
drift, stale connections, and prompts before admission.
- Connect lazy restored handles through read-only native session
inspection. Keep the existing process ownership and launch snapshot
checks.
- Replace Grok's unsupported standard config setter. Keep the existing
Claude effort path.
- Add behavioral guard cases and a real ACPX client fixture for fresh
and cold Low/High sessions. The fixture resets effort on restore if
metadata is absent, as the pinned CLI does.
- Publish Copilot profile v69 because its source identity includes the
shared runtime adapter. Preserve published v66/v67/v68 bytes and the
reviewed Grok v67 candidate as history. Keep old profiles closed for
launch.
- Explain the native protocol in the Grok Runner guide and use
provider-independent upgrade banner text.

## Verification

- Three native create/load/resume cases failed before the repair. The
pre-fix guard rejected the native metadata reply.
- Seven affected Runner test files: 234 tests passed after the master
merge. These include native Grok admission, the real ACPX transport
fixture, runtime ownership, Claude effort, and profile history.
- The review follow-up extends the same Low/High fixture through a
complete first turn after cold restore. It checks the repeated native
load, original session id, actual response event, and completed turn.
All 127 tests in the three affected Grok/adapter files passed again;
Runner typecheck and source identity checks also passed.
- All 167 existing agent form tests passed. Token gates and diff checks
passed.
- Workspace typecheck passed. Final Runner typecheck and generated
profile checks passed.
- Production `pnpm build` passed, including after the master conflict
resolution. Runner typecheck, profile history checks, and the 234
affected tests passed on the merged source. All 55 Rust ACPX library
tests also passed on the merged source.
- Real pinned Grok 1.0.13 metadata probes reproduced the unsupported
standard setter and native create/load/resume behavior. No model prompt
was sent. An earlier actual ACPX runtime probe passed fresh and cold
Low/High metadata checks. A repeat with an explicitly isolated HOME
failed authentication before session creation, so it does not count as
final live acceptance. The deterministic transport fixture is green; a
deployed shell task remains required.
- `pnpm test:run` did not complete locally. Embedded Postgres failed
during bootstrap after five attempts. This is the same local fixture
limitation recorded for #17922. Fresh PR CI must pass before merge.
- After deployment, retry the original bounded shell task with the saved
Grok 4.7/High configuration. Verify actual tool output, a successful
run, and Done state after reload.

- Final commit `810d84fd19728e7d798989582f26b05f69166db2`: all CI gates
passed. Greptile and the formal Paperclip review both reached 5/5. No
unresolved review threads remain.

## Risks

- This depends on the pinned Grok 1.0.13 native metadata format. Missing
or conflicting replies stop admission instead of silently changing
effort.
- Cold restores must make one read-only native inspection call before
admission. The existing handshake timeout and process ownership checks
still apply.
- The shared adapter changes Copilot's source identity. The new current
profile includes the final source hashes; the prior profile remains
decodable but cannot launch.
- This does not change the Grok CLI version, account selection, search
policy, dependency patch, or lockfile.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact serving model ID and context window are
not exposed in this session. The agent used reasoning, code editing,
shell tools, and browser tools.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 17:53:58 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 0a08d37aa0 feat(runner): recover controller authority without interrupting execution (#17097)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and owns their business authority.
> - Runner owns execution transport, acknowledgements and replay.
> - A replacement controller must recover that transport without
starting another provider turn.
> - An external store can retain the required control records without
copying streamed text.
> - A duplicate local journal adds synchronous disk work without
providing the replacement server's authority.
> - This PR adds the optional recovery contract and its standalone
proof. Server adoption and browser delivery have separate owners.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

A surviving runner can reconnect to a replacement controller with its
admitted process, session and active turn.

**Current behavior**

Local controller files do not provide recovery on empty replacement
storage. Rewriting those files after an external checkpoint is installed
also blocks normal controller work.

**Proposed behavior**

An optional callback stores opaque checkpoints. The replacement restores
that checkpoint before it constructs the controller. Installing the
callback makes the external store authoritative. Local storage holds a
marker that requires restoration. Consumers without the callback retain
their file journal.

PR 1 of four: #17097 → #17439 → #17455 → #17456. Related work: #17390
and #17361. The pre-split reference remains
`codex/hot-upgrades-reference-2026-10-24`.

## What Changed

- Add opaque checkpoint encoding, restoration, incremental persistence
and authenticated sparse recovery cursors.
- Keep authentication, commands, semantic inputs and lifecycle events
behind their commit barriers. Share semantic-call ownership between live
dispatch and recovery.
- Keep streamed text out of recovery checkpoints. Preserve bounded
retention, original deadlines and admitted process identity.
- Stop normal local journal writes after external persistence is
installed. Fail closed on a local marker until external restoration
occurs. Preserve current master's staged file writes for standalone
consumers.
- Keep provider-native admission and authorization behind adapters.
Preserve historical Copilot attestations and bind the merged launch and
transport sources in v68; preserve published v66 and prior development
identities.
- Add the one-process scripted executor fixture and deterministic
outage, replay, failure and backpressure tests. Add no production test
endpoint or auxiliary process.

## Verification

The completion-recovery correction passes three restart regressions that
fail before its respective transport/driver fixes. All 230
controller/attestation cases, all 302 Codex transport cases in the full
repeat, and all three one-process fixture cases pass. The broader
Codex/Dot/Muse run passes 326 cases and times out one existing mid-goal
case; its isolated retry and complete Codex repeat pass on unchanged
source and binaries. The initial timeout remains recorded. Conformance
and replay parity pass.

Historical v65/v66 attestation bytes remain frozen; v67 binds the
changed transport. The local runner-only API-authority lane passes 2,027
cases but its 47 HTTP cases cannot initialize embedded Postgres on this
Mac. The integrated owned-database HTTP path is verified in PR 2. At
preceding head `0d8d1b8250`, the Actions workflow passes after one retry
of runner-service shutdowns. Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved threads.
The interrupted attempt is retained. All checks on that preceding head
are terminal and green/neutral/skipped.

Run `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run
src/control-plane/durable-prp-control-plane.test.ts
src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts --maxWorkers=1` and `node
packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/copilot-profile-identity.mjs --check`.

The [qualification
record](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/hot-upgrades-qualification/doc/plans/2026-10-22-hot-upgrade-qualification.md)
retains exact revisions, failed attempts and qualification limits. The
local cost campaign observes zero hot-path local journal fsync calls. It
does not qualify a native harness or hosted deployment.

Master reconciliation `d5fc443626` preserves the published v66 and prior
development identity bytes and binds the combined transport in v68. All
290 focused runner/profile cases and runner typecheck pass. The first
sandboxed invocation cannot open loopback listeners; the permitted
repeat passes. Fresh CI and Greptile are pending for this updated head.

Current merge candidate `4fb3d1835b` also fixes public-reader
publication before external commit. New held/rejected-write cases fail
before correction and pass afterward. The full controller repeat passes
168 cases. The combined lane passes 390 other
recovery/transport/profile/fixture cases; its first two overlap fixture
failures are retained and corrected to observe callback entry instead of
provisional state. Runner TypeScript build and typecheck pass.
Current-head GitHub Actions is green and Greptile is 5/5 with all
threads resolved. The superseded master-reconciliation CI shutdown
remains recorded.

## Risks

The persistence callback is an acknowledgement barrier. Failure must
stop delivery. A consumer that installs external persistence must
restore its committed checkpoint before restarting; the marker is not a
recovery snapshot. Sparse display recovery does not reconstruct
acknowledged text or repeat execution. This slice has no Postgres
schema, application authorization or browser behavior.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools and code
execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 17:10:32 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip f60ac29cf1 fix(runner): migrate Grok Build with native reasoning effort (#17922)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Harness selection maps supported agents to Paperclip Runner.
> - The native Runner already supports Grok Build, but its migration
mapping excludes Grok.
> - Grok agents also have a thinking-effort setting that the native
execution contract does not carry.
> - This pull request adds the migration path and preserves explicit
Grok effort through startup and resume.
> - Operators can upgrade an existing Grok agent without silently losing
its model, account, or effort.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

Existing Grok Build agents have no Runner selector or upgrade action.
Adding only the mapping would route conversion through the Codex
fallback and lose Grok execution semantics. Native execution also
ignores the legacy reasoning-effort field.

**Expected behavior**

A qualified Grok agent can explicitly upgrade. The saved model, account,
instructions, history, and supported effort remain intact. Unsupported
legacy settings fail before saving. The provider must acknowledge the
selected effort before inference.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Open the runtime page of an existing Grok Build agent on a qualified
Linux x64 or macOS ARM64 computer.
2. Observe that the Runner selector and upgrade action are absent.
3. Compare the native execution input with the saved legacy
reasoning-effort setting.

Related work: #13882 introduced native Grok Build. #15422 covers the
earlier default-runner work. This change extends the current shared
selection contract.

## What Changed

- Add the Grok harness mapping, qualified platform limits, upgrade
action, and company-scoped computer qualification.
- Translate Grok settings to ACPX without changing the selected account
or explicit model. Resolve the legacy default model to the native
default. Preserve the effective legacy search policy. Reject
incompatible command, argument, permission, and turn-limit settings.
- Add native execution input v10 for explicit Grok effort and search
policy. Preserve historical schemas. Enforce disabled search through
Grok requirements and bind it across startup and recovery.
- Apply and verify ACP `reasoning_effort` before prompting. Bind the
value to provider descriptors, checkpoints, runtime identity, and resume
checks.
- Use the Grok catalog and effort choices in the task composer. Apply
task model and effort overrides while retaining the agent account and
search policy. Update runtime controls, portability/default handling,
documentation, and capability maps.
- Advance Pi and Copilot source attestations for changed shared
transport and recovery code. Keep historical identities intact and
update all Rust integration fixtures.

## Verification

- Migration and review regressions were reproduced before the fixes.
Coverage includes the Grok mapping, default model, explicit effort,
implicit search policy, task overrides, and incompatible legacy
settings. The broad migration, route, immutable-input, and composer
check passed 478 tests. The final catalog and task-input check passed
135 tests.
- Runner startup, recovery, search policy, and profile checks passed 361
tests, with one platform skip. The final source-identity,
search-admission, and transport event-pump check passed 89 tests.
- All 757 Rust workspace tests passed for the broad implementation.
After the final source attestation update, all 55 ACPX profile/session
tests passed.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed for the implementation.
Server and Runner typecheck passed after the final production change.
Server `tsc --noEmit` passed after the final test-fixture change. Docker
context integrity, token gates, maps, generated protocol data, and
replay goldens passed.
- The v10 startup fixture initially used an ambient local Grok login and
failed on CI. An explicitly empty credential home reproduced all four
failures. The fixture now supplies a synthetic key and a private empty
home. A separate case checks that missing credentials fail closed. All
seven selected Grok v10 and Claude v9 startup cases pass without host
credentials.
- The full local suite could not complete because embedded PostgreSQL
failed before database-backed fixture setup. The broad executor-suite
attempt hit the same limit and was stopped. Neither attempt is counted
as passing. Current-head CI must verify those paths before merge.
- Earlier CI found missing Rust input fields, stale source attestations
and exact fixture pins, a missing Docker context entry, and an outdated
import expectation. Those failures were fixed and checked locally. The
CI logs retain the original failures.
- Different earlier CI runs also failed unchanged cleanup pagination,
device-login timeout, and chat lost-response recovery cases. Later
attempts passed the cleanup and login cases without changes to those
implementations. Their causes remain unproven. The original evidence
remains in [the first
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40563402840),
[the login
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40571128328),
and [the chat
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40573072163).
A passing retry does not establish a root-cause fix.
- Both reviews rate current head
`16fba9b4cdf12bc7945e6628912e79da42959f35` 5/5. All current-head CI
gates pass in [run
40576580699](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40576580699).
All 60 check runs completed cleanly, including the four intentional
skips and the neutral 5/5 Paperclip review. The legacy security status
is successful. No review threads remain unresolved.
- Staging migration and a real shell task are pending deployment. This
PR does not claim full Grok provider qualification. Reviewers can verify
the operator path by upgrading a qualified Grok agent, checking its
saved model and effort, and running a shell task through native
execution.

## Risks

- Explicit effort and search policy require the matching Runner and
sidecar build. Older immutable execution inputs keep their existing
schemas.
- Providers that omit or reject the selected effort fail before a
prompt. Unsupported effort does not fall back silently.
- Existing agents retain their saved runner until an explicit change.
New Grok agents use native execution only on qualified platforms.
- Grok token and cost reporting remain unverified, as before.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact serving model ID and
context-window capacity are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning,
source editing, shell execution, and browser inspection.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and the focused suites pass; the full
local suite has the environment limitation recorded above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 15:28:42 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip db70c5acd9 fix(runner): retain startup Stop and exhaust reconnect recovery (#17812)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Operators must be able to stop a remote runner while it starts.
> - Remote artifact staging can finish after the transport's bounded
cleanup wait.
> - The launcher discarded an early Stop request and could dispatch
after staging.
> - A separate path missed the runner's plain-text reconnect expiry
receipt.
> - This change retains startup cancellation and ends an exhausted
reconnect incident.
> - Public package imports and a source-bound profile keep the
regressions buildable and admission checks intact.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related work: Refs #16835, Refs #16843, Refs #16855.

**What happened?**

The HTTP Stop route returned 200 and recorded a cancelled run. After
bounded bootstrap cleanup, releasing artifact staging still dispatched
one launch RPC. A separate reconnect test accepted a replacement after
the runner reported that its grace period had expired.

The first PR head also failed CI. The HTTP regression imported Runner
source across the server TypeScript boundary. Its event receipt mock
read a field that is not present on both event forms. The changed
transport also invalidated the pinned Copilot source identity.

**Expected behavior**

A cancelled launch must remain cancelled after staging. An exhausted
reconnect receipt must end that incident. Regression tests must use
public package contracts. The source identity must cover the changed
transport without replacing historical profile bytes.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Hold the remote launcher's artifact staging promise.
2. Call the board Stop route and let bootstrap cleanup reach its
preparation deadline.
3. Release staging and count launch RPCs.
4. For reconnect expiry, end an owned runner with its coded or
plain-text expiry message.
5. Run the server typecheck and the Copilot profile identity check.

## What Changed

- Retain cancellation through staging, trace publication and an
in-flight launch RPC.
- Apply a deferred signal through the existing identity checks when the
launch identity arrives.
- Preserve an earlier KILL request when a later TERM request arrives.
- Recognize both coded and plain-text reconnect expiry receipts.
- Test the real board Stop route and heartbeat cancellation with
PostgreSQL. Use public Runner exports and handle both event receipt
forms.
- Generate source-bound Copilot profile v65 after integrating current
master. Preserve exact published v62, v63 and v64 fixtures, retain the
earlier v63 reconnect candidate as historical evidence, and reject
historical profiles for a current launch.
- Document process evidence, retained uncertainty and the limits of
cleanup and continuation evidence.

## Verification

- At current integration head
`2b96ee3adcb3be642c538436113e1159d92f843d`, launcher and HTTP Stop
regressions: 21 passed. This includes the existing process-generation
and exact-exit safety cases on the integrated base. The HTTP case
includes bootstrap expiry; it is not isolated Stop-only settlement
proof.
- At current integration head, reconnect expiry regressions: 2 passed,
for coded and plain-text receipts.
- At current integration head
`2b96ee3adcb3be642c538436113e1159d92f843d`, the Copilot installation and
identity suite passed all 63 tests and the canonical generator check
passed. Before regeneration, the merged-tree admission test failed with
a transport source hash mismatch and the generator reported a stale
identity. Published v62, v63 and v64 bytes remain unchanged; the prior
reconnect candidate is preserved separately. The v62 fixture SHA-256
remains
`faa4d1b35267b54e134a8e0c84586fe1196d8fad5525cb53aa195aae53ca6e83`.
- Current integration head passed all 86 focused tests, the full
recursive repository typecheck and the root repository build. The normal
server typecheck also passed, including its full Runner release rebuild.
- Historical full recursive repository typecheck and the root repository
build passed at `187bb85b4fa1fbd2ffaec992650a1c8557df9ebe`. Server
typecheck also passed through the normal package script and a direct
full server TypeScript check. The prerequisite full Runner release build
passed.
- The historical HTTP baseline returned 200 and dispatched one late
launch RPC. The repair returned 200 and dispatched zero in the bounded
fixture.
- Earlier failures remain part of the evidence: the first head failed
TypeScript package boundaries and source identity. One local HTTP run
failed before migrations; it passed after the disposable test database
received normal migrations. Earlier sandbox-wide checks ran out of
memory or lacked Cargo. Those runs did not pass.
- Historical head `187bb85b4fa1fbd2ffaec992650a1c8557df9ebe` received
Greptile 5/5 with no actionable findings and all hosted gates passed in
run `40412261957`: 53 successful check runs, four expected skips and a
successful legacy Snyk status. Those results predate the master
integration and do not establish current-head readiness.
- Current integration head `2b96ee3adcb3be642c538436113e1159d92f843d`
includes master `bd382eee536f4ada680072b1cc19100163c3d04a`. All
current-head hosted gates passed in run `40512885858`: 53 successful
check runs, four expected skips and a successful legacy Snyk status,
with zero pending or failed checks. Build passed at 13:42:36 UTC and the
final `ci / verify` aggregate (job `122224566238`) passed at 13:43:00
UTC on 2026-10-27. Greptile reviewed exact head
`2b96ee3adcb3be642c538436113e1159d92f843d` at 5/5 (updated 2026-10-27
13:36:41 UTC), with no actionable findings and no open inline threads.
The hosted partitions passed full-suite verification, including browser
and release gates. The wider qualification limits below remain in force.
- Local setup on current master initially failed frozen install with
`ERR_PNPM_LOCKFILE_CONFIG_MISMATCH` because `patchedDependencies`
differs from the lockfile. Pinned pnpm 9.15.4 hydrated dependencies with
`--no-frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts`; its generated lockfile change
was restored. This PR changes no lockfile or workflow.
- Reproduce the Stop tests from `server`: `pnpm exec vitest run
src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts -t 'remote
runner process supervision|HTTP Stop during remote runner staging'`. The
test accepts a guarded disposable `_test` database through
`PAPERCLIP_TEST_DATABASE_URL`, or starts its normal embedded database.
- Reproduce reconnect tests from `packages/paperclip-runner`: `pnpm exec
vitest run src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts -t 'does not restart
an exhausted reconnect'`. Build the normal test runner first.
- Reproduce profile checks from `packages/paperclip-runner`: `node
scripts/copilot-profile-identity.mjs --check` and `pnpm exec vitest run
src/drivers/acpx/copilot-installation.test.ts`.

## Risks

- The wider qualification is incomplete. Verified-stopped replacement
and concurrent recovery plus Stop each entered two physical provider
processes. Both fail the original requirement of at most one physical
provider entry. Passing fixture assertions do not make all incident
scenarios accepted.
- HTTP concurrent recovery, shared provider-attempt accounting,
server-admitted restored continuation, live-provider behavior and
product cleanup settlement remain unrun or unproved.
- Accepting a deferred signal is not proof that a dispatched process
stopped. The existing monitor remains authoritative.
- The HTTP test uses the real route, heartbeat cancellation and
PostgreSQL state. Execution lease and event ports, plus the launch RPC,
are controlled fixtures. Bootstrap expiry participates in this case.
- The local incident matrix uses an installed runner binary and a
scripted provider. It does not qualify a live provider. Local fixture
teardown does not certify product cleanup settlement.
- This change does not authorize historical turn replay. It does not
change ownership, pause, approval or provider-attempt gates.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The runtime does not expose the exact
serving model ID or context-window size. The agent used reasoning,
repository inspection, shell execution and connected GitHub tools.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 08:45:00 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 13709b4c7a feat(connections): let agents configure connections within delegated authority (#17737)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Connections provide governed tools, chat channels, model accounts,
and gateways.
> - Several management routes require a human board actor even when an
agent has the required grant.
> - Default agents must configure these resources within the responsible
user's authority.
> - This pull request adds a shared authorization path to the existing
REST and native API surface.
> - Human authentication, execution approvals, and local host boundaries
remain enforced.
> - The benefit is that a standard agent can complete authorized setup
with a bounded human handoff.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Server authorization, connection services, shared contracts, native API
discovery, database schema.

**Problem or motivation**

Connection administration is available in the web app but often
unavailable to agents. Agent grants, responsible-user authority,
credential ownership, and actor attribution need separate checks.
Opening gateway-token creation also requires preserving the issuing
agent's delegated authority during token use.

**Proposed solution**

Use the existing authorization evaluator for every connection family.
Enforce current responsible-user authority, effective trust, grant
scope, resource visibility, and target-agent access. Keep existing agent
grants unchanged. Expose authorized configuration through default
`search_api` and `call_api`. Save human authentication steps and let
agents continue after completion.

**Roadmap alignment**

This change completes the API access path for the existing Connected
Apps, Personal & Shared AI Accounts, and governed MCP Gateway
capabilities in `ROADMAP.md`. It follows the maintainer's requested
design. Related work: #11899 enforces connection execution access and
creator/manager rules; this PR extends agent management across
connection families. It does not replace that execution-policy work.

## What Changed

- Add shared connection management context and mandatory
responsible-user, trust, scope, and target checks.
- Allow authorized agents to configure tool, chat/email, GitHub/Slack,
AI, profile, and gateway resources through existing routes.
- Preserve human credential ownership and record the actual agent,
responsible user, and run or key in audit data.
- Preserve saved browser authentication handoffs and callback session
checks.
- Bind agent-issued durable gateway tokens to their responsible user and
recheck delegated authority at use.
- Add explicit REST transport and management capability metadata,
built-in guidance, and sensitive-response handling.
- Intersect caller and endpoint-agent Slack test/invitation policies,
including independent and shared rates. Require the addressed human’s
current endpoint identity link before completing identity handoffs.
- Add production-authenticated integration scenarios. Companion #17739
contains the saved setup UI (including the required human
import/rotation step), product and permission documentation,
catalog/Vercel credential and callback ownership, and operation maps to
keep each review below 100 files. Both PRs must ship together; merge
this implementation first, then its companion.

## Verification

- Current implementation head:
`2ecd6451d0d0c8d82121a4e3fa4ce94c5befbbd6`, including master
`ea727dc3c2`, 99 files. The latest follow-up fixes the two valid
findings from the preceding f9 review. Exact-head Greptile has completed
at5/5 with no findings and Superagent passed. Full exact-head Linux CI
workflow40446606056 completed SUCCESS; only the queued external
Paperclip Review remains pending; earlier Linux passes do not qualify
this successor.
- Latest preserved-stack verification passed **2,165 tests** in fresh
PostgreSQL: **70 actual-auth scenarios**, 27 OpenAPI contracts, 2,022
native API tests and 46 saved GitHub wizard cases. **141 existing
gateway/policy acceptance tests** also passed. Workspace
typecheck/build, maps and token gates passed. The first workspace
typecheck was blocked by sandbox tsx IPC permissions; its authorized
rerun passed. This is focused local evidence; the full Linux CI matrix
is still required.
- Issuer/target gateway policy regressions were red before the fix. Both
decisions now intersect, including Block/Ask first/rates, same
credential identity and current token/user/agent authority after
approval. Invocations retain their token and actual requesting agent;
deleted tokens fail closed. Thirteen actual-auth cases cover revocation,
narrowed scope, approvals, shared rates and board compatibility.
Intermediate missing-token attribution, review-context and
implicit-session actor failures remain in the qualification record; all
final cases pass.
- Activity pagination now retains a bounded cursor across private-only
windows. The actual-JWT regression reaches three older readable events
after 27 private ones without exposing private details. A native
device-login regression was red for plaintext receipts; local check and
test-call results now use existing protected-response handling. The
passing actual-auth case proves encrypted persistence, exact replay,
redacted history and no response asset.

- Previous-head `5b55195593` Linux CI initially failed e2e shard 4/8 in
the existing connection-intent continuation test: periodic recovery
queued a repair at 01:21:47, the scripted journey completed the task at
01:21:48, and the extra queued run was cancelled at 01:21:49 because the
task was terminal. The assertion selected that latest cancelled run.
GitHub refused the first attempt while the workflow was nonterminal.
After completion, the single evidence-supported failed-job rerun was
accepted as **attempt 2** on the same head (workflow 40431202466). The
failed shard and final E2E aggregate passed on attempt 2, and the
complete Linux workflow for that head is successful. The original
failure remains part of qualification. No additional unchanged-code
rerun will be used for this failure.

- Companion CI also has an unchanged login-cleanup idleness timeout,
retained in its qualification record. That same 16-case suite passed in
this parent Linux run and a fresh local database. Both preceding
workflows passed after their single failed-job reruns as attempt 2; the
original failures remain recorded. No additional unchanged-code rerun
was used.

- Migration `0380_broken_aqueduct.sql` was regenerated through the
repository workflow after master took 0379 for project Git
authorization. It adds the responsible-user column with `IF NOT EXISTS`,
preserves upstream migrations, and satisfies snapshot retention and
migration safety checks.
- Upstream published Copilot v62 and v63 identities remain byte-for-byte
unchanged. The combined guidance is now v64, digest
`sha256:22e31f95ef972bcead98a4a707c9f33433558fd111e390e027a2bbb4346e112a`.
The normal shared TypeScript/Rust identity check and **61 Copilot
installation tests passed**. The old source-identity assertion first
failed against unchanged published v63; regenerating a new v64 preserves
the published release.
- Workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`, map validation, and UI
token gates passed on the final combined stack after the upstream merge.
Node 24.22.1 / pnpm 9.15.4 were used.
- **Earlier 82 API/OpenAPI tests passed** in fresh PostgreSQL 18: 55
assembled-server scenarios and 27 contracts. They use real persistent
agent keys, run JWTs, human sessions, production defaults, and
deterministic provider fixtures. No actor injection establishes access.
- The new email regression was red before per-account scope filtering.
The Arcade regression was red before human ownership and inventory-key
fixes; it also verifies actual-agent audit identity and a human-session
inventory read. The activity regression measured **200 authorization
checks before the fix and one afterward** for the same one-item page.
- **82 GitHub UI tests passed**, including all three new
failed-replacement regressions that were red before their fix. The UI
preserves an earlier copy only after confirming its committed
generation. Changed or unreadable results block copying and reconnecting
until reconciled. Human-only secret responses now include their
nonsecret committed generation.
- Private test status now rechecks the originating principal and linked
task, including mandatory agent/responsible-user privacy. Cross-agent
tests require the full caller tool access decision and the same
credential identity, regardless of auth label; caller and target
policies/approvals and rate limits apply before execution and after
human approval. A profile-only precondition was found to reject valid
allow-policy and scoped-grant access and has been removed. Both
permitted-access cases and a no-auth-label identity regression were red
before the correction; caller-specific Block still prevents provider
execution. The private-status regression was also red before its fix.
- The tool-activity regression measured 100 capability decisions and 102
run captures on a 100-event page before the fix. It now uses two task
decisions and at most two captures while retaining the same 50 visible
events, private-event filtering, and 403 after audit-grant revocation.
The regression was red before request-context reuse and task-decision
sharing; final server typecheck/build also pass.
- Generic chat configure/reconnect now hands agent-supplied verification
credentials to the addressed human before provider work or vault
changes. Actual key/JWT regressions were red for Slack signing-key
replacement and generic channel secret-reference rebinding. They now
prove unchanged refs and vaulted signing value, human setup, permitted
agent bot-token repair, and governed test messages. All 82 API/OpenAPI
cases pass in fresh PostgreSQL. Eight native receipt protections and
final server typecheck/build also pass.
- The preceding review found that old healthy state could retire a
credential-entry card before a human changed anything. The actual-JWT
regression was red. Saved field generations now change only with
protected values and commit with refs plus a verification fence; retries
retain the baseline. Old health, bot-token repair and unchanged entry
stay pending. New signing verification and current authority permit
continuation. A separate red race proved that user revocation during
provider authentication could return 403 after refs changed; authority
is now checked before persistence and inside the credential transaction.
The final 82 API/OpenAPI cases, four neighboring real-database
Slack/GitHub lifecycle cases, and final server typecheck/build pass.
- A preceding full run crossed a rate-window boundary. Database rows
prove one consumed slot at 23:35 and another at 23:36 for the same
policy/bucket. Only Date is frozen in the rate test cases; transport and
asynchronous timers remain real. Production rate behavior is unchanged,
and the final full run passes. An intermediate fixture failure that
overwrote hidden generation metadata with an API projection is retained
in the qualification record.
- Linux CI on an earlier head found two rate-admission assertions that
omitted the newly persisted bucket key. The failures were reproduced
locally; both assertions now verify the exact actor/tool bucket and all
49 policy-service tests pass. The companion qualification record retains
the initial and intermediate failures. Catalog creator attribution is
preserved in the companion to keep this implementation review at 99
files.
- The latest review reproduced three regressions before repair: complete
human replacements failed on unavailable old signing secrets, fresh
GitHub links incorrectly selected reconnect, and different
credential-entry requests shared an idempotency key. Each old protected
ref now has a narrow known-unavailable fallback; unexpected resolver
failures and company/scope violations still abort. Fresh imports keep
their credential form, configured endpoints keep reconnect, and
canonical field sets/completion modes distinguish handoffs while
matching retries retain their baseline. All 55 actual-auth scenarios and
27 separately run OpenAPI contracts pass, as do server typecheck/build.
Companion #17739 also passes all 41 wizard tests including actual
fresh-form submission, UI typecheck, maps and token gates. Earlier red
results and a mistyped OpenAPI filename are retained in qualification.
- The configured GitHub handoff regression was red in the
browser-component tests and actual-auth link/persistence tests. Saved
links now name requested fields and all/any completion mode; the
companion form submits those supplied fields through reconnect and
retains other saved credentials. Webhook/client-secret reconnect remains
human-only; first-setup secret restrictions remain. All 46 wizard tests
pass, including combined modes and legacy links. A duplicate review
referenced the older companion bf760912; the current form is already
fixed, linked in the reply, and its thread is resolved.
- Linux CI on bf760912 failed automatic Slack provisioning because vault
persistence cleared an already verified manifest-update challenge. The
same regression was reproduced locally. The provider-owned helper now
preserves proof only for the current signing fingerprint and callback
URL. Eight existing compatibility cases pass, including this case and
initial GitHub secret rejection. The first uncommitted GitHub-field
variant also failed that initial boundary and was narrowed to reconnect;
both failures remain in qualification.
- The upstream merge conflicted only in generated migration metadata.
Upstream 0379 is preserved, normal generation/pruning produced 0380, and
two repeated applications of the idempotent additive SQL passed. The
final combined stack passed **128 tests** (55 actual-auth, 27 OpenAPI
and 46 wizard cases) in fresh PostgreSQL. Eight Google UI cases also
pass; the two protocol cases could not initialize embedded PostgreSQL in
this fresh local attempt. Their earlier passing evidence remains
historical; fresh Linux CI must execute them. Vercel personal credential
attribution is preserved in companion #17739 with its other
ownership/consent follow-ups, keeping this PR at 99 files.
- The suite covers fresh defaults, restricted users/agents, scopes,
personal isolation, token revocation, human handoffs, callback replay,
execution approvals, authorized self-targeted policy changes,
self-approval denial, and current authority before commit. Reproduce API
checks with `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/connection-management.integration.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts`, using a fresh database
through `PAPERCLIP_CONNECTION_MANAGEMENT_TEST_DATABASE_URL` or the
default embedded test database.
- Companion #17739 also records consent separately from token refresh so
saved Google choices survive refresh. Its eight service-picker and two
local-HTTP OAuth tests pass; both new UI cases were red before the fix.
Normal migration generation confirms no SQL change is needed for the
additive JSON metadata.
- The integration module shares one assembled server, authentication
factory, and provider lifecycle to preserve the
HTTP-to-vault-to-task-continuation proof. A reused external database
caused a Slack fixture identity conflict; the fresh final run passed.
Earlier fixture/transport and contract-update failures remain in the
companion qualification record.
- The broad local `pnpm test:run` attempt remains blocked by macOS
embedded PostgreSQL's host semaphore limit. It is not a clean pass. The
fresh Linux CI matrix must complete. Provider fixtures do not prove live
setup or an empirical LLM success rate.
- A current-head completed Paperclip assessment is not yet recorded. Its
earlier external recovery boundary has not been bypassed, and no
incomplete assessment is reported as passing. The user authorized both
merges when checks pass; merge this implementation first, then replay,
retarget, and requalify companion #17739 against the squash-merged
master.

- After the master refresh, local workspace typecheck/build, **97
actual-auth/OpenAPI cases** and **141 gateway/policy cases** pass. The
original fixed database port was occupied; Docker assigned a free
localhost port. The first neighbor setup command could not resolve root
`tsx`, leaving its schema uninitialized; the built database package
migrated the separate fixture and all unchanged cases passed. Both setup
failures are retained in qualification. Fresh Linux CI remains required;
no full local test-sweep pass is claimed.

- The f9 Greptile review scored **2/5** for two reproduced findings:
Slack test sends skipped the caller’s tool policy, and healthy App
credentials completed an unconfirmed identity handoff. Both are fixed in
this head and have resolved evidence threads
([Slack](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17737#discussion_r4384927765),
[identity](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17737#discussion_r4384927895)).
Actual key/JWT cases cover twelve Slack caller/target/recipient
combinations; the human-session GitHub OAuth callback alone remains
pending until explicit confirmation. All **99 API/OpenAPI tests** (72
actual-auth + 27 contracts), workspace typecheck and build pass. On the
combined companion, all four focused cases (including the twelve Slack
combinations), typecheck/build and maps also pass. The continuation
suite’s 50 embedded-PG cases were skipped because its database could not
start locally; fresh Linux CI must run them. Initial fixture
credential-collision and audit-projection assertion failures are
retained with the red reproductions in the companion qualification
record. No full local sweep or live consent is claimed.

## Risks

- The maintainer explicitly confirmed authorized policy administration,
including self-targeted changes that loosen controls. These writes
require management grants and the responsible user’s current authority.
Agents cannot approve their own governed action requests or edit their
own principal permission grants. The actual-auth regression exercises
both permitted administration and those denials.
- This is a broad authorization change. Incorrect scope or owner
resolution could deny permitted setup or expose another user's
resources. Integration cases cover both permitted and denied requests
with actual authentication.
- The additive nullable gateway-token column does not infer identities
for legacy clients or backfill agent grants. Legacy agent tokens without
a responsible user fail closed.
- Provider fixtures test supported setup and callback contracts. They do
not prove live provider availability.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific deployment ID or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — focused suites above;
full local sweep remains blocked as documented
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green — exact `2ecd6451d0` Linux CI
completed SUCCESS; external Paperclip Review is still queued
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups —
exact `2ecd6451d0` review completed; both f9 findings have resolved
evidence replies
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 08:20:24 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 208a093d19 fix(chat): preserve resumed review waits and retry newer saved input (#17725)
<!-- entire-trail-link-start -->
https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/-/trails/36/changes/paperclip/36
<!-- entire-trail-link-end -->

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - GitHub review agents publish findings and wait for an authorized
reply or head change.
> - Review tools could retain the requester after resume while
completion lost that same wait proof.
> - A yielded report could then queue its own continuation or repeat a
missing-wait error.
> - Ordinary Retry could also select an older failed turn while a newer
saved request had no admission.
> - This change shares the existing authority proofs and canonical
admission owners.
> - Current access, publication, execution and budget gates remain
required.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #17318. Builds on the canonical saved-input retry owner in #17733.
Related #16550 covers deferred legacy comments after ownership waits.
The separate recovery repair in #17724 owns the cleanup-to-saved-input
handoff; this PR does not add a second admission owner.

A resumed review could publish an assessment, then turn its
`response_wake` into an immediate `issue_status_changed` wake. A
provider that omitted its continuation could instead repeat a completion
error. A newer linked-human message saved during a budget hold could
also remain unstarted because Retry selected the older failed source.

## What Changed

- Resolve passive review waits through the accepted requester ledger
used by GitHub tools. Require the latest reviewed head, exact company,
task, agent, repository and processed publication under current access.
- Fill omitted/null yielded continuation from that server proof. Permit
an inherited normal tree resume only through its accepted parent
identity. Permit an ordinary follow-up only after this run has a
processed useful reply linked to its exact inbound message. Reject
acknowledgements, partial assessments, pending or uncertain writes as
that reply proof.
- Recheck the same run/review/head/source proof during feedback,
finalization and final status commit. Preserve explicit malformed-input
rejection and Done policy. Add no monitor permission or publication
grant.
- Keep heartbeat and publication projections narrow. Preserve both
published Copilot v62 identities and generate source-bound v63 from the
pinned merged base. No v63 live qualification is claimed.
- Certify the structured isolated-directory binding failure only at its
pre-allocation boundary and only through canonical task Retry. Other
workspace validation reasons and unknown effects remain denied.
- Route Retry to eligible newer saved input through the existing
canonical owner. Preserve the old result and skipped receipt. Require
current principal, source, App, runtime fence, budget, native ownership
and exact cleanup proof.
- Recover absent historical App metadata only through an earlier trusted
processed response receipt and an immutable non-null endpoint claim.
Explicit malformed or conflicting metadata stays denied.
- Revalidate execution through the exact claimed wake, coalesced task
Retry and resolved user-continuation receipt after admission. A second
normal Retry can recover the exact never-started authorization failure
with unchanged saved input. Require empty execution evidence, exact
diagnostics and no allocated or active executor.
- Explain when a recorded result prevents exact replay. Ordinary board
Retry directs a new task message to continue from saved work. Inherited
requester identity alone never grants replay.
- Keep accepted board-message preparation failures with the canonical
task Retry owner. Certify the exact unchanged comment, original user
wake, accepted same-user identity and absence of provider execution. Pin
that source, recheck it at admission, and bind identity initialization
to the coalesced intent and exact claimed successor receipt.
Uncertifiable sources retain an actionable fresh-message refusal.
- Return safe named authority categories for board Retry refusals.
Update execution documentation and capability maps. Add no schema or
polling loop.

## Verification

- A fresh external review request exposed a separate isolated-directory
preparation failure before allocation. Its first normal Retry saved an
intent but admitted no successor. This follow-up certifies only that
exact structured preparation boundary through the existing canonical
Retry owner, with trusted failed settlement and no executor, lease,
result or output. A real HTTP/queue regression reproduces the missing
successor before the repair. Twenty-three current-source safety cases
and the final 98-case Retry/HTTP group pass, including a fresh click
after a denied intent, source revocation, accepted results and the older
direct API remaining denied. The warning case uses actual configuration
preparation and production event append; unknown warning shape or
provider provenance stays denied. Full workspace typecheck, build, maps
and diff checks pass. Renewed hosted normal Retry now succeeds on the
final combined source: it preserves the exact saved request and linked
requester, starts one native successor in a fresh attempt workspace,
publishes the current-head 2/5 assessment and commits In review with
passive response wake.

- A later hosted normal Retry published a low-score assessment but lost
its accepted source identity because the previous attempt failed before
identity initialization. It repeated continuation errors, then submitted
Done. This is failed acceptance, not a successful qualification. The
initializer now retains the exact source only after execution-time
failed-chat Retry authorization; generic Retry and Done policy are
unchanged. A real queue/initializer regression fails with a null source
on the previous code and passes with the newer saved source. Two real
database completion cases verify that source yields the authoritative
wait and commits In review. Renewed hosted normal Retry now retains the
accepted source and exposes the authoritative current-review wait. It
completed after two semantic feedback corrections (wrong contract
revision, then wrong criterion IDs); the correct contract was present in
emitted input. The third finish was accepted and committed In review,
with no missing-wait loop or Done escalation.
- Repeated board-message preparation failures now walk their canonical
intent, failed dispatch and accepted parent identity, rechecking each
contained predecessor. A production queue regression fails the second
ordinary HTTP Retry before the repair and passes afterward. Changed
source, contradictory execution evidence and cyclic receipts remain
denied; traversal stops after twenty links.

- New inherited omission cases failed before the repair. The final full
PostgreSQL 18 wait/status suite passes **252 tests** under Node 24.22.
It covers omitted/null input, malformed-first recovery, same-head
resume, exact-source replies, changed heads, revoked access,
pending/uncertain/mixed publications, final commit revalidation, no
duplicate review and no self-wake.
- **15 existing publication tests passed before the pinned merge** on a
separate fresh database. They retain default partial-delivery and
failure-fallback behavior. Context reads remain below the unchanged 16
KiB heartbeat and publication response limits with large saved output
present.
- Saved-input tests cover a real signed PR webhook, production
accounting-budget refusal, normal policy recovery and canonical Retry.
Historical producer-shaped tests prove the missing-App case red, then
check trusted prior receipts and malformed, late, revoked or mismatched
proof. A broader order-coupled test was reproduced on the prior source;
its global fault injector now targets its own authorization query. The
43-case sequence passes without changing production behavior or its
safety assertions.
- New signed-ingress and real heartbeat execution tests reproduced the
admitted-successor failure, then the next normal Retry failure. The
final pinned merged source passes 249 full GitHub review/publication and
Retry cases on a fresh database, including all 49 saved-input cases. A
separate 74-case Retry/HTTP run also passes. Exact dispatch negatives
cover source, company, agent, task, successor, receipt, pause,
assignment, accepted success, controller and cleanup proof. Bootstrap
contradictions remain denied. The canonical Retry suite passes 16 cases
through its supported external PostgreSQL test connection.
- The normal board HTTP route reproduced the unusable inherited-result
refusal. It now returns actionable guidance without starting a
successor. The actual UI Retry hook and banner tests pass 12 cases.
- A production-shaped accepted board comment followed by a pre-provider
qualification failure reproduced HTTP 409 before the repair. The final
real HTTP/queue test certifies one canonical successor and preserves the
accepted identity. It rejects changed source, actor, task, agent,
result, controller, process, profile, allocation and receipt evidence. A
post-acceptance source change keeps the same intent pending. Execution
revalidation rejects removed or mismatched proof. The probe stops
deliberately after production identity initialization; it does not claim
provider execution. The final source passes the 75-case Retry group, the
focused two-case board/inherited-policy group and 19 canonical Retry
cases. Full workspace typecheck, build and map checks pass.
- Full workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. Map,
module-boundary and diff checks pass. Full local `pnpm test:run` remains
unverified. The 256-case explicit-native suite cannot initialize its
packaged PostgreSQL because libzstd is absent; an existing
command-scoped fallback did not resolve it. Current-head remote
full-suite checks are required. Merged-source full GitHub+Retry (249),
separate Retry/HTTP (74), full wait/status (252), profile/history and
completion (75), and visible Retry hook/banner (12) checks pass. The
fresh owned PostgreSQL 18 databases applied all 377 migrations.
- Actual Rust Runner, OpenCode 1.18.34 and exact DeepSeek used unchanged
production-generated synthetic contexts. Resume finished with an
explicit server wait. The author-reply trial omitted continuation twice:
its first report failed the existing empty-criteria check; the corrected
second report still omitted continuation and received the exact server
wait. It completed once with no missing-wait loop or Done escalation.
Controller acknowledgments were synthetic; these probes do not establish
hosted publication or board state.
- Hosted combined testing proved automatic admission of the exact saved
author reply, a useful GitHub answer and committed passive wait. It
required two malformed-continuation rejections before a nullish fallback
succeeded. A later normal Pause/Resume completed in one finish with
explicit response_wake and no new review/comment. The admitted normal
Retry then exposed the execution guard gap repaired here. Those remain
checkpoint results. On the final combined source, renewed normal Retry
completed actual native provider work and GitHub publication, committed
the passive wait, released ownership and cleaned up its environment. A
subsequent ordinary unmentioned author reply woke once, made no GitHub
tool calls or new assessment, and completed its first finish with an
explicit response wake. Both exact leases expired with successful
cleanup and the queue was empty. However, final destination inspection
found a separate automatic fallback overwrote the existing summary with
a generic no-final-response message. External summary preservation
therefore remains failed acceptance; the separate publication repair in
#17726 owns that producer. Full combined publication preservation has
not passed. These hosted runs include the pinned-base native additions;
they do not qualify Copilot v63.
- Current-head automated review is 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. All
current-head CI gates passed (54 successful checks/contexts, four
skipped, none pending). The earlier login-cleanup idle-work assertion
also reproduced locally while its controlled baseline passed; its cause
remains unknown, but the exact assertion passed in the fresh
current-head CI shard. No timeout, assertion or production workaround
was added. This PR is ready for review within its source, authority,
native finalization, state, wake and cleanup scope. The independent
automatic fallback publication regression is tracked by #17726; no
complete combined workflow pass is claimed.

## Risks

- The latest saved review defines the durable head boundary. Ingress
must record a new head before admission. A reply receipt proves delivery
only for its exact saved source; a shared GitHub comment ID alone cannot
authorize this wait.
- Historical App recovery cannot infer identity without direct proof or
an earlier valid server response receipt. It never replays that
response.
- This does not infer review-score policy from instructions or override
Done. No deployment, merge or repair of historical tasks is claimed by
the PR.

## Model Used

OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with reasoning, repository inspection, code
editing and test execution. The context-window size is not exposed in
this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused database and
native suites; full local suite limitation described above)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green (verified on immutable latest
head)
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
(verified on the latest head)
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-26 22:22:47 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 718c73dafe fix(native): require verified remote process exit receipts (#17799)
Require fresh ESRCH or an exact matching zombie generation before treating a remote Runner as stopped. Preserve uncertain ownership through adoption and transport close, retire local controller resources after failed close, and check Node before remote launch.

Bind the shared transport change in Copilot profile 62 while retaining historical profile decoding. Add red-green process, permission, launch, adoption and cleanup regressions.

Thanks to @hsm-lv for the original investigation in #17073.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-26 21:39:04 +00:00
DottaandPaperclip 125ddcabe5 perf(runner): keep event journal writes off the HTTP thread (#17745)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and their work.
> - The HTTP server also owns durable Runner state.
> - Each committed event rewrites and flushes that state on the HTTP
thread.
> - Large journals and slow writes delay unrelated navigation and saves.
> - Event acknowledgements must still wait for durable storage.
> - This PR stages output writes asynchronously and joins them before
writer replacement.
> - The board can serve requests while Runner output waits for storage.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #17507. Related: #17514 reduces writes per event burst. This PR
moves individual output writes and file flushes outside the HTTP thread.

**What happened?**
A live CPU profile spent about three seconds of a 13-second sample
serializing and synchronously writing Runner state. Representative
journals were about 9 MB. Unrelated task requests had multi-second
delays.

**Expected behavior**
A slow output-journal write must leave unrelated HTTP requests
responsive. An event must not be acknowledged before it is durable.

**Steps to reproduce**
Hold an authenticated output event's file flush in the durable protocol
test. Send an unrelated HTTP request during that flush. Also save a
command, reconnect, or retire the controller during the write.

## What Changed

- Stage `item.delta` snapshots with asynchronous file writes and file
flushes. Keep lifecycle, control, authentication, and tool events
synchronous so transport readers observe durable boundaries.
- Fence publication by saved revision. An older snapshot cannot replace
newer commands or connection state. A failed write fences the writer.
- Write compact JSON and share private-file checks. Existing journals
remain readable.
- Stop external ingress before joining admitted writes. Checkpoint only
after retirement succeeds. Close reports a failed detach consistently
and releases notification consumers.
- Add real HTTP and Rust transport cases for held writes, reconnects,
commands, failure, restart, close, and timeout.
- Add immutable Copilot source identity v61 for the changed shared
transport. Preserve v60, historical decoding, exact-current launch
checks, and qualification flags. No new live Copilot qualification is
claimed.

## Verification

- Head `6f5c92e778`: workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`
passed. All CI gates passed in [run
40356159484](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40356159484),
including both full Runner shards. Fresh Greptile review is 5/5; all
findings are resolved.
- Current-base focused verification passed 300 cases across protocol,
real Rust restart/continuation, permission, backend, and
immutable-profile suites. The complete transport suite also passed 286
cases before the base refresh.
- Earlier iterations exposed lifecycle visibility, late writer
publication, and close-order failures. Controlled regressions reproduced
each before repair. CI also found missing test-peer drain methods and a
stale source fingerprint; both are corrected. An older broad local test
run was stopped after its source was superseded. No full local-suite
pass is claimed; full coverage passed in isolated CI.
- A synthetic 9 MB journal comparison used 20 writes per sample and
concurrent HTTP probes, with alternating baseline/treatment order. HTTP
median changed from 31 ms to 2–3 ms; p95 changed from 51–85 ms to 12–21
ms. Parsed output was equal. The asynchronous loop served 125–153 probes
versus 19–20, and took longer overall (992–1069 ms versus 675–678 ms).
This proves local I/O responsiveness, not deployed application latency.
- Deployment and live save/archive acceptance remain pending.

## Risks

Persistence interleavings affect restart authority. The tests cover
concurrent commands, replacement, failed storage, and reopening the
journal. JSON serialization, atomic rename, directory flush, and
control-event writes remain synchronous. This change still rewrites
whole journals. Incomplete retirement retains recovery evidence and
fails the close. A new exact-current Copilot source identity can reject
an older launch identity; historical decoding remains available. No
migration is required.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, tool use, SSH and browser
diagnostics, code editing, and test execution. The exact serving model
suffix and context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-26 11:19:36 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 5823e9a664 fix(runner): preserve disabled Codex web search (#17744)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native Codex agents use the saved agent settings to prepare each
provider launch.
> - Onboarding saves web search as off, but native configuration
conversion removes that setting.
> - Codex 0.160.0 includes a hosted web-search tool by default, even in
an authentication probe that asks it not to use tools.
> - A gateway that permits only priced function tools can reject that
request before budget admission.
> - This change preserves the explicit restriction through native
execution and disables web search for authentication probes.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A native Codex authentication probe can include hosted web search.
Normal task execution also loses a saved `search: false` setting. A
restricted Responses gateway can reject these requests before it makes a
model call. Related repairs: Refs #17445, Refs #17529. The roadmap and
related PRs were checked; no duplicate repair was found.

**Expected behavior**

Authentication probes check the selected account and model without
hosted web search. A saved search-off setting remains effective in
native task launches, prepared launches, and session recovery. Existing
behavior for an absent setting remains unchanged.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Create a Codex agent with search off and choose Paperclip Runner.
2. Use a Responses gateway that rejects hosted tools.
3. Inspect the request from the native authentication probe or task
launch. Before this fix, the pinned Codex SDK includes `web_search`
despite the saved setting.

## What Changed

- Preserve an explicit search-off setting when native agent
configuration is built and converted.
- Carry the restriction in the durable native input and provider launch
requirements.
- Apply the restriction to authentication probes and normal launch
paths, including custom arguments and recovery.
- Reject prepared launches that discard the required restriction. Keep
gateway billing rules unchanged.
- Admit only the restrictive literal value in the strict plugin task
API. Exercise the real plugin setup path.
- Add regression coverage and document the policy.
- Add the immutable Copilot v60 source identity required by the changed
shared files. Preserve v59 and all original live evidence. Copilot
authentication probes keep their prior launch requirements.

## Verification

- Regression cases were run against the unfixed source and failed at the
configuration and launch boundaries.
- An isolated capture using the real Codex 0.160.0 app-server reproduced
hosted-tool rejection. Disabling web search reached a mocked budget
reservation. The helper and child processes permitted only loopback
network access and used synthetic credentials. It made zero upstream
calls.
- Focused checks passed: 284 server cases, 61 native form cases, 198
backend/security/launch/parser cases, and 36 authentication/launch
cases. A separate complete transport/launch/parser run passed 393 cases.
These groups overlap.
- Head `617b98f` passed workspace typecheck/build and 28/28 plugin
contract and actual Runner probe tests with no skips. Final rebased head
`20ff0c1` passed all current-head CI checks, including full isolated
test lanes, and fresh Greptile and Paperclip reviews at 5/5.
- The additive Copilot identity update passed 134
compatibility/policy/protocol checks and nine authentication probe
checks. The real pinned Codex SDK capture was repeated after the final
policy change: all five cases passed with zero upstream calls.
- Two local full-suite attempts stopped after native PostgreSQL loader
failures. Seven local dependency aliases were restored, and an isolated
cluster initialized successfully. A third run later encountered host
PostgreSQL semaphore exhaustion and was interrupted before
source-profile regeneration. Its zero exit code after SIGINT is
explicitly not a full-suite pass. Final full-suite verification runs in
isolated CI; the local attempts remain recorded.
- The first CI run exposed a missing strict plugin API field. Its five
failures were reproduced locally, then passed after repair. The next run
passed every underlying job except the source-identity guard. That guard
now binds an additive identity with v59 retained. Final-head CI and both
fresh reviews passed; addressed review threads are resolved.
- The offline capture runs on Darwin ARM64. It does not prove the
contents of a prior unretained Linux request or complete Cloud
onboarding acceptance.

## Risks

- The restriction must survive prepared launches and resumed sessions.
Regression tests cover those boundaries.
- Existing absent settings retain their prior behavior. This change does
not add native search-on support or loosen gateway admission.
- Older durable inputs without the optional restriction must remain
valid.
- Copilot now uses profile v60 for exact launch admission. Historical
v59 inputs remain readable. The new declaration adds no live Copilot
qualification and does not change its executable or admission flags.
- A deployed Cloud acceptance run is still required after this source
repair.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code execution, and
delegated review. The exact backend model identifier and context-window
size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-26 10:29:51 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip aec86c794b fix(runner): preserve native work through controller outages (#17594)
Keep remote native work under its authenticated connection lease through controller outages. Hold durable ACPX tools through reconnection, align the native Claude HTTP MCP client budget, and wait for the recovered handler before dispatch. Preserve Stop, cancellation, exact identity and artifact checks.

Verified with real-process regressions and a real Claude Opus 5.5 Daytona workflow: 125 seconds offline during useful work, original process and lease retained, no failed native tool calls, queued follow-up completed, independently verified ZIP and committed workspace receipts. All current-head CI gates pass and Greptile is 5/5 with all findings resolved.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-25 09:01:24 -05:00
Nicky Leach 2cd6eb27c7 fix(runner): record the plugin-prepared working directory (#17243) 2026-10-22 20:42:26 -07:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip 0081863463 Fix isolated ACPX admission for assigned PRP tools (#17149)
## Thinking Path

- Paperclip uses Runner to execute agent tasks under Core's selected
policy.
- The ACPX sidecar can receive assigned MCP tools in its PRP catalog.
- Isolated admission still requires a separate native MCP endpoint for
those assignments.
- This check rejects a valid PRP route before the provider can start.
- This PR identifies the sidecar's PRP transport at the runtime-host
boundary.
- The benefit is that assigned tools work with the existing isolated
permission policy.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

An isolated Claude task with an assigned MCP binding fails with
`assigned native MCP launch binding is unavailable` when Core delivers
its tools through PRP.

**Expected behavior**

The sidecar must accept its authenticated PRP tool bridge as the
assigned-tool route. Callers that use the native gateway must still
supply its complete binding.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Open an isolated Claude sidecar session with `deny-all` permissions
and a read-only policy.
2. Supply an assigned MCP binding in the runtime context and its tools
in the PRP catalog.
3. Omit native gateway environment variables. Admission fails before
provider startup.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced against `92cfd701c39bb1ea394a796023481a21decb2532`.

**Deployment mode**

Runner with an ACPX sidecar and controller-owned tool delivery. Related
contract work: #16978. The search found no existing PR or issue for this
failure.

## What Changed

- Let runtime-host callers select PRP delivery when they supply the
semantic tool bridge.
- Select that route in the sidecar. Keep native gateway validation and
direct callers' default behavior.
- Preserve exact controller operation names in PRP mode, including the
compact assigned-MCP catalog. Keep existing aliases for other bridge
callers.
- Preserve the selected permission and read-only policies.
- Add one process-level sidecar regression and one host admission
regression. The host test calls the real authenticated MCP bridge.
- Document the route and refresh the generated Copilot source hashes.
The provider and profile versions stay the same.

## Verification

- Passed 11 focused tests after the rebase across the runtime host,
sidecar, tool bridge, and Copilot identity tests. They cover both
compact catalog operations, restricted and approve-all policies, legacy
aliases, missing and invalid gateway bindings, and the existing direct
gateway path.
- The process-level test crosses the real sidecar dispatcher and stops
at workspace validation before provider startup. The host test uses real
ownership sockets and MCP HTTP, with a fake provider port.
- The generated identity tests match the current source hashes. The
historical fixture stays unchanged.
- The standard review passed on the rebased commit. [Apex passed the
required 5/5
threshold](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/runs/119513362214)
on `e63a223`, with 11 files reviewed and no findings.
- Rebased onto master `734c265`. The conflicts affected generated source
identities and their test expectations. All reviewed behavior files
remain byte-for-byte unchanged. The user authorized retaining the Apex
result for this rebase. [CI passed on
`3facef5`](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39685163239).
The final PR checks contain 56 passes and four expected skips. The
branch is current with master, has no conflicts, and has no unresolved
review comments.
- `node packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/copilot-profile-identity.mjs
--check` passed.
- Initial local runs exposed missing test dependencies and sandbox
denial of loopback sockets. After the scoped dependency install and
socket permission, the selected tests passed.
- Broad typecheck, build, and test verification runs in GitHub CI, as
requested. No live provider or model request was made.

## Risks

- PRP callers must supply the assigned tools in the controller-owned
catalog. The existing bridge still enforces its closed catalog and
authentication.
- An explicit PRP selection without a semantic bridge still fails.
Invalid native gateway bindings still fail.
- No database, protocol-frame, provider-version, or credential-storage
change is required.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with source inspection, editing, and command
execution. The exact served model ID and context-window size are not
exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-21 16:00:14 -07:00