Commit Graph
12 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DottaandPaperclip b8f6d9b23f docs: clarify delegated connection feature and access maps (#17882)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The feature and agent access maps describe user journeys and their
permission boundaries.
> - PRs #17737 and #17739 added delegated connection setup across
several existing areas.
> - The maps include those operations, but some recipes and board-only
statements are stale.
> - This PR adds usable setup recipes and corrects the access
descriptions.
> - The benefit is a clearer verification path that preserves human and
agent authority boundaries.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #17737, #17739.

Related: #17862 changes connection setup advice and catalog choices.
This PR only clarifies the existing maps.

**Issue type**

Outdated and missing documentation.

**Where is the issue?**

The paired connection setup, app permissions, chat channels, model
accounts, and gateway maps under `maps/`.

**What's wrong?**

Delegated setup guidance sits under Gotchas without a matching driving
recipe. Some model-account text still groups supported account sign-in
with board-only host controls. A few callback, privacy, and native
admission descriptions omit important limits.

**Suggested fix**

Add the missing recipes. State the current route and service boundaries.
Keep existing capability IDs and distinguish source review, fixture
tests, and live provider proof.

## What Changed

- Add paired entry points and driving recipes for delegated setup,
permission changes, and managed AI sign-in.
- Describe Google consent restoration, GitHub requested credential
fields and saved rotation, and Vercel personal credential attribution.
- Correct the Vercel callback state checks and chat
conversation/test-status privacy scope. Name the separate GitHub
registration handoff endpoint.
- Replace blanket board-only AI login wording with the specific
managed-account and host/session boundaries.
- Link the five access maps to shared native admission and work-mode
limits. State the permitted self-targeted policy administration
boundary.

## Verification

- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passed: 35 paired areas and 192 stable
capability IDs. This checks structure and references.
- `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs` passed. Generated output remains
ignored.
- `git diff --check` passed.
- Eleven selected cases in
`server/src/__tests__/connection-management.integration.test.ts` passed
on source `db70c5acd9`, the unchanged base of this documentation commit.
They use a fresh PostgreSQL database, actual agent keys/run JWTs, human
sessions, and deterministic provider fixtures. The other 61 cases were
not selected.
- The selected cases cover connection/profile creation, Google saved
choices, native API entry points, Slack caller/target policy, GitHub
import and identity confirmation, durable gateway authority, AI
accounts/pools, saved human handoffs, revocation, scope, trust, and
Ask/Plan denial.
- Read-only source reviews checked all five areas. The disposable
database was removed after the run.
- Full workspace typecheck, build, and test sweep were not rerun for
this Markdown-only change. Live provider login and browser journeys were
not run. Per-operation source-only/not-run labels remain unchanged.

## Risks

Low risk. Incorrect documentation could misstate a permission boundary
or imply broader verification. The changes cite the owning routes and
services and retain fixture and live-provider limits. No runtime,
schema, lockfile, or workflow files change.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution, and read-only source-review agents. The session does not
expose a more specific deployment ID or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — existing fixtures
verify this documentation-only change
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green — CI is running and Paperclip
Review is queued on the current head
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups —
exact head `4d16f101968d6908f90f72b6ff6ecbb79037f168`
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 09:40:41 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 0c9d10d695 feat(connections): complete saved setup guidance and coverage maps (#17739)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Product and agent access maps describe the same capability IDs.
> - Agent connection management changes the callable operations and
permission boundaries.
> - Reviewers need an operation inventory that distinguishes API access,
human handoffs, and fixture evidence.
> - This pull request adds saved setup screens and updates the maps for
#17737.
> - The benefit is that users and contributors can inspect the coverage
and remaining boundaries.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Product and permission documentation, saved authentication setup UI and
consent metadata, and product/agent access maps.

**Problem or motivation**

The current maps describe board-only management paths. They need to
match delegated connection management and distinguish administration
from ordinary tool execution.

**Proposed solution**

Record route operations, required grants, responsible-user limits,
transport, saved authentication handoffs, provider-fixture evidence, and
explicit local-operator boundaries for every connection family.

**Roadmap alignment**

This is the documentation companion to #17737. It covers existing
Connected Apps, governed MCP gateways, chat channels, and
personal/shared AI accounts. It uses existing server setup operations
and adds their saved handoffs to the existing UI.

## What Changed

- Show saved AI sign-in and connection setup handoffs in the existing
UI.
- Open GitHub import and rotation links at the required human step.
Resume a committed rotation after reload without asking for another
secret.
- Restore saved Google service choices for the addressed user while
preserving newer consent. Successful direct/cloud consent records its
own timestamp, independently of refresh or lease writes; existing
refresh paths preserve it.
- Update product, implementation, and permission-default documentation.
- Reconcile app permissions, connection setup, chat channels,
profiles/gateways, and model account coverage.
- Use matching capability IDs in the product and agent access maps.
- Label source-reviewed operations separately from fixture-tested
operations and live provider setup.

- Preserve catalog creator attribution under the responsible user, with
the actual agent still recorded. This follow-up moved from the
implementation to keep both reviews below 100 files. This companion now
changes 38 files, including the preserved Vercel personal-credential and
OAuth callback attribution follow-ups alongside consent and catalog
ownership.

- Name the addressed-human browser-session and consent step for Slack
managed authorization and installation. Preserve source-only evidence
for those individual operations.

## Verification

- Current companion head: `04d40cdd605452d91cf4931476eb292a210825af`,
including implementation `2ecd6451d0` and master `ea727dc3c2`, 38 files.
All intended companion files survive: 35 are byte-identical to the
previous companion; two chat maps and qualification add current
evidence. Exact-head Superagent passed and Paperclip Review supplied an
actual neutral5/5 assessment with no findings and explicit
no-independent-runtime/live/current-CI verification limits. Exact-head
Greptile also completed at5/5 with no findings; both formerly failed
shards and their verification aggregate passed on attempt2; full
exact-head Linux CI workflow40446969603 completed SUCCESS. All current
checks and statuses are terminal clean, with no unresolved findings.
This PR remains dependent on #17737 and needs fresh checks after its
required post-squash replay. The preceding 605 head’s reviews are
historical after this update. Older b0ea Linux workflow success after
its single rerun also remains historical.
- Earlier preserved-stack verification passed **2,165 tests**: 70
assembled-server actual-auth scenarios, 27 OpenAPI contracts, 2,022
native API tests and 46 saved GitHub wizard cases in fresh PostgreSQL.
The parent also passed **141 existing gateway/policy tests**. Workspace
typecheck/build, maps and token gates passed. The initial typecheck IPC
denial and all material intermediate regressions remain in the
qualification record; no full local sweep or live provider setup is
claimed.
- Operation maps now cover issuer/target gateway policy intersection and
post-approval revocation, bounded activity pagination through
private-only windows, and native local-login encrypted receipts. The
companion preserves the Vercel OAuth callback ownership change with its
existing credential ownership follow-up.

- Parent CI has one retained connection-intent e2e failure from a
periodic-recovery timing race. GitHub refused the first job-rerun
attempt while its workflow was nonterminal. Once completed, the single
failed-job rerun was accepted as attempt 2 and passed, including the
full parent Linux workflow.

- Companion Linux server shard 4/12 retained a cleanup-idleness timeout
in `login-cleanup-work.test.ts` (active work was still 1 after its
five-second wait). The same unchanged cleanup suite passed all 16 cases
in the parent Linux job 121950185096 and all 16 cases locally against a
fresh disposable PostgreSQL database. Relevant cleanup/reaper/scheduling
runtime code is unchanged. The single unchanged-code failed-job rerun
was accepted as **attempt 2** on the previous `b0ea3c940f` head
(workflow 40431671705). The failed shard and complete Linux workflow
passed on attempt 2; no additional unchanged-code rerun was used for
this failure. The first local attempt failed the existing dedicated
`_test` database-name guard before running tests; the correctly named
fixture passed without weakening the guard.

- **Earlier 82 GitHub UI tests passed**. All three new replacement cases
were red before the fix. A confirmed unchanged generation preserves the
earlier copy; a changed or unreadable generation blocks copying and
reconnecting. An explicit status check can restore the copy when it is
still current. All earlier import, rotation, verification, and retry
states remain covered.
- The complete stack passed **82 API/OpenAPI tests** in fresh
PostgreSQL, including 55 scenarios with real agent keys, run JWTs, human
sessions, production defaults, persistence, and deterministic providers.
The parent also passed **60 Copilot installation tests**, preserving
published v62 and binding combined guidance as v63.
- **Earlier 10 focused Google/OAuth tests passed**: eight picker cases
and two local-HTTP protocol cases proving consent metadata survives
concurrent token refresh. The refresh and legacy UI cases were red
before the fix. These protocol fixtures use the existing injected board
actor and do not count as agent-authenticated proof.
- Workspace typecheck/build passed after the consent change; normal
migration generation reported no SQL changes for the additive JSON
metadata. The parent's latest caller-authorization correction passed
server typecheck/build. Map validation and token gates passed. Maps
cover 35 areas and 192 capability IDs. The specification names migration
`0380_broken_aqueduct.sql`.
- The test-call operation maps now record the full caller/target tool
access decision (profiles, policies, and explicit grants), credential
identity for every auth label, approval, and rate checks. The
profile-only precondition was removed after the new permitted-access
cases failed; those cases and the no-auth identity regression now pass.
Saved test status requires its originating principal and current
linked-task access; actual key/JWT privacy-denial evidence is recorded.
- Tool-connection activity is now operation-verified: 100 events over
two tasks require two capability decisions and at most two run captures
(previously 100/102), preserve private-event filtering, and deny the
next request after audit revocation. The regression was red before the
fix.
- Cloud enrollment creation and callback entries now name
instance-administrator and company/principal checks. The callback is a
browser return with HTML or a 303 redirect. Status reads retain their
separate board-actor rule.
- Operation maps identify the API, transport, authorization, evidence,
and human/operator boundaries. Structural checks do not establish live
provider behavior. Earlier failures and fixture corrections remain in
`doc/plans/2026-10-13-connection-api-parity.md`.
- An earlier companion head (`26edbe17`) received an actual Paperclip
Review assessment of 5/5 with no actionable findings, published with
neutral status. That review did not run tests or confirm CI, and it is
historical for this new head. The prior incomplete execution result is
not counted as a passed assessment. Fresh review remains pending. The
duplicate enrollment findings have explanatory replies and are resolved.
- The latest implementation correction passed all 55 actual-auth
scenarios and 27 OpenAPI contracts (separate commands). It repairs
unavailable old credential material, preserves fresh import versus
configured reconnect links, and distinguishes credential field
sets/completion modes in handoff keys. The new fresh-link and collision
cases were red before the fix. All 41 GitHub wizard tests now pass,
including filling the fresh saved handoff and asserting App import
rather than reconnect; UI typecheck, maps and token gates also pass.
Qualification retains the earlier failures and an incorrect OpenAPI
filename that selected only the integration module before the correct
separate contract run.
- Configured GitHub credential-entry links carry canonical requested
fields and all/any mode. The form displays and submits those values
through human reconnect while retaining other saved credentials. Two
webhook/client-secret cases were red before the fix; combined all/any
and legacy-link cases also pass. The current UI fixes the old bf760912
baseline referenced by the duplicate main review finding.
- After merging master baec3abd67 and regenerating migration0380, the
complete stack passed **128 tests** (55 actual-auth, 27 OpenAPI and 46
GitHub wizard cases), workspace typecheck/build, maps and token gates.
Eight current Google UI cases also passed. The two local-HTTP OAuth
cases could not initialize embedded PostgreSQL in this fresh attempt, so
that attempt is not a protocol pass; the earlier ten-case evidence is
historical and fresh Linux CI remains required.
- The reproduced Linux automatic-Slack challenge failure is fixed by
retaining verification only for the same signing fingerprint and
callback URL; all eight neighboring provider compatibility cases pass.
Qualification also retains the uncommitted GitHub field variant that
failed initial-secret compatibility before the extension was narrowed to
reconnect, and the first unmigrated external-database diagnostic.
Upstream 0379 remains intact; normal generation/pruning produced
additive/idempotent 0380, with repeated application verified.
- Both PRs must ship together. The user authorized merging when checks
pass. Merge #17737 first, replay only this companion's changes onto
master, retarget this PR, and require fresh current-head CI and review
before its squash merge.

- The updated maps distinguish authorized bot-token/API-key setup from
human verification-key entry and forbid generic channel secret-reference
replacement. Actual key/JWT security baselines were red before both
guards; all 82 API/OpenAPI cases, eight native receipt protections, and
49 policy-service tests now pass. The qualification record preserves the
initial lifecycle/fixture/union-assertion diagnostics and the preceding
Linux CI assertion failures. Maps pass on this updated stack. Fresh
exact-head CI and reviews remain required.

- The parent now preserves a per-field credential-change boundary before
retiring saved credential-entry cards. Old health, unchanged entry,
unrelated repair and retries cannot bypass it. Current authority is
checked before and inside credential persistence; a real provider-time
revocation regression was red before the fix. Final 82 API/OpenAPI
tests, four neighboring lifecycle cases, and server typecheck/build
pass. Maps pass, and qualification retains the hidden-metadata fixture
failure and the measured minute-boundary rate-test failure. Production
rate behavior is unchanged; only the relevant test Date clock is fixed.

- After the current master/parent refresh, all **341 affected UI
cases**, combined workspace typecheck/build, maps and token gates pass.
The updated parent also passed **97 actual-auth/OpenAPI cases**, **141
gateway/policy cases** and **61 profile installation cases**. Published
upstream Copilotv62/v63 remain unchanged; combined guidance is now v64
(`sha256:22e31f95ef972bcead98a4a707c9f33433558fd111e390e027a2bbb4346e112a`).
Qualification retains the initial source-identity failure and fixture
port/migration setup failures. No full local sweep, fresh local OAuth
protocol run or live acceptance is claimed; fresh Linux CI must qualify
this successor.

- Latest review follow-up: the parent fixes caller-policy bypass in
Slack tests/invitations and premature identity-handoff completion. The
maps now name caller/target Block/Ask/rate intersection, one charge for
a shared bucket, and the addressed human’s exact current identity link.
Parent verification passes all **99 actual-auth/OpenAPI tests**,
typecheck and build. The preserved combined companion passes the four
focused tests (including twelve Slack policy/recipient combinations and
the actual human OAuth confirmation path), workspace typecheck/build and
maps. The 50 embedded-PG continuation cases were skipped locally because
their database could not start; fresh Linux CI remains required. All
material red/intermediate results and corrected-fixture evidence are
retained in the qualification record.

- Current `04d40cdd60` CI workflow40446969603 retained two new failures:
server1/12 `workspace-runtime.test.ts` could not reach a fixture
subprocess’s health endpoint within its ten-second readiness window
(job122001926052), and chat2/3 `wakes Slack session sync from
publication commit and leaves settled action queues quiet` observed one
select after its idle predicate (job122001925936). Both same cases
passed in parent `2ecd6451d0` Linux jobs122001920494/122001920581. The
runtime and queue implementations are unchanged by this companion. Both
failing cases also pass unchanged locally: two real-subprocess runtime
readiness/reuse tests and the exact Slack quietness assertion against a
fresh migrated PostgreSQL database. Logs:
`/tmp/parity-04d-server1-failure.log`,
`/tmp/parity-04d-chat2-failure.log`,
`/tmp/parity-2ecd-server1-green.log`,
`/tmp/parity-2ecd-chat2-green.log`,
`/tmp/parity-04d-runtime-qualified.log`,
`/tmp/parity-04d-chat-quiet-qualified.log`. The single standard
unchanged-code failed-job rerun was **accepted as attempt2** on the
unchanged exact head at `2026-10-27T04:24:30.513973+00:00` after the
workflow completed. Both new failure retry allowances are now
**consumed**; both failed shards and the complete Linux workflow have
now passed on attempt2, including the verification aggregate. No
additional unchanged-code rerun will be requested for either failure. No
timing, assertion, idle-work guard or policy was weakened. If either
case fails again, investigate/fix rather than rerun again. The older
5b/b0ea rerun allowances remain consumed and separate.

## Risks

- Saved handoff links depend on the API changes in #17737, including the
nonsecret credential-generation metadata. Both PRs must ship together.
- A map can overstate operation coverage. Entries identify their
evidence and retain human authentication and trusted-host limits.
- Structural map checks do not prove live provider behavior.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific deployment ID or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — focused UI/guidance and
map checks
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — saved setup UI
tests and map validation apply
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — exact `04d40cdd60` full Linux
CI completed SUCCESS on attempt2; all current checks/statuses are
terminal clean, with an actual neutral5/5 Paperclip assessment
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups —
exact `04d40cdd60` review completed with no findings
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 08:21:02 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 4d90634f74 feat(connections): add 1Password service-account connector (#17249)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and govern their access to
outside services.
> - Apps connections keep provider credentials in the instance vault and
mediate every action through grants, policies, and audit.
> - Agents currently have no Apps connection for reading or managing
1Password items with an operator-supplied service-account token.
> - 1Password supports this through its official SDK; its documentation
MCP server does not expose vault operations.
> - This pull request adds a one-field service-account connection and
registers eight reviewed SDK actions through the existing
native-provider catalog.
> - Operators can select vault permissions in 1Password and agent/action
access in Paperclip without installing a CLI or handing durable
credentials to agents.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: #16144 adds 1Password as Paperclip's secret-storage backend.
This PR adds the separate Apps/tool-access flow with a per-connection
credential; it does not change secret providers or use a server-wide
ambient token.

**Subsystem affected**
Apps catalog, native tool-provider registry, and shared connection
setup.

**Problem or motivation**
People need to paste their own `OP_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN`, find official
service-account setup instructions, and authorize agents to use the
selected vaults through ordinary Paperclip governance.

**Proposed solution**
Add `1password/service-account`, with a password field labeled **Paste
your 1Password Service Account token** and a link to [1Password's
creation
instructions](https://www.1password.dev/service-accounts/get-started#create-a-service-account).
Use the pinned official `@1password/sdk` 0.5.0 for vault/item listing,
item and secret-reference reads, and item create/update/archive/delete.

**Alternatives considered**
A remote MCP card would not provide vault access. A local CLI or a
third-party MCP package adds installation and credential surfaces that
the official SDK avoids.

## What Changed

- Added the source and generated catalog definition, permission review,
official light/dark artwork, documentation, and capability-map
references.
- Added a provider-owned SDK bridge with strict schemas, account-domain
validation, contract hashes, fixed errors, bounded output, and
disposable workers with cancellation/deadlines.
- Registered the provider through master's native-provider catalog;
existing setup, health, discovery, gateway, policy, and audit owners
remain in place.
- Labeled the single password field **Paste your 1Password Service
Account token**. The shared formatter preserves explicit credential
prompts; ordinary key labels retain their existing presentation.
- Added credential-ownership, gateway read/write, policy/revocation,
worker, setup UI, and interactive Storybook coverage.

## Verification

- Final review follow-up: added two deterministic worker-entry tests for
nested exact-token redaction and oversized-output rejection. Removing
each guard caused exactly its regression test to fail. The focused
provider suite passed **15 tests**, and the official server typecheck
passed after rebuilding stale workspace SDK artifacts. Current head
`569cb7f9bd57db791fb13a6034ce69bf50878cb1` passed the full [CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40016166260),
including typecheck, build, unit/integration tests, and all eight
browser shards. The required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e` gates passed.
[Greptile](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17249#issuecomment-6353731805)
and [Paperclip
Review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17249#issuecomment-6372165895)
each rated this exact head **5/5**, with no open findings. Paperclip
Review completed with a neutral check because its scoped reviewer could
not inspect CI; the full CI result was verified separately. Other
neutral checks and intentionally skipped Storybook jobs contain no
actionable findings.
- CI recovery on the same commit: the first attempt lost six jobs. Five
logged simultaneous runner shutdowns at 18:49 UTC on 2026-10-23; the
sixth stopped logging before a test result and its root cause was not
established. No assertion failure appeared in the retrieved logs. All
six jobs and the aggregate gates passed one failed-job retry. [CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40005754936).
- Copy follow-up: the catalog, provider, and setup UI suites passed
**275 tests**. The governed gateway lifecycle passed **3 tests** (one
live-only test skipped), including create, update, archive, and delete.
UI token gates and map checks passed. The branch was rebased onto
`9c442cf48e` to resolve additive catalog conflicts while retaining the
Vercel and Supabase entries. The existing live write proof below remains
applicable; this follow-up changes presentation only.
- Five affected suites, including the existing Daytona consumer, passed
**290 tests** (one opt-in live test skipped in fixture mode). Full `pnpm
-r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. The local broad-suite attempt
could not complete because PostgreSQL semaphore exhaustion prevented a
competing integration suite from starting; the complete affected-file
retry passed after disposable-process cleanup. The prior commit
`f208a8aff6dc28859cc3f343497e18d85f124579` passed the complete CI
matrix. All CI build, typecheck, test, and browser gates also passed on
the earlier commit `9e2f3d3140368a08da43b004b2e8d3a0f4c0fa4d`. The
separate Paperclip Review reported a worker-result regression-test gap
on that head; the follow-up above addresses it. Its review thread is
resolved, and both fresh current-head reviews are clean as recorded
above.
- Token gates, module boundaries, brand validation, map checks, and
Storybook catalog checks passed.
- Direct SDK create/archive/delete and rejected-call coverage passed (13
provider tests); the Storybook Permissions/Test play completed
successfully in Chromium. Server and UI typechecks passed after those
fixes. Greptile passed prior commit
`9e2f3d3140368a08da43b004b2e8d3a0f4c0fa4d` at **5/5**. Both reviewers
also passed the worker-test follow-up at **5/5** as recorded above.
- Live 1Password proof on 2026-10-22: connect, eight-action discovery,
vault listing through an actual run-scoped gateway, refresh, reconnect
preserving identity, another read, removal, and denial through the
retained session passed. Credential absence was asserted in
responses/audit; an exact-token scan of inspected logs and changed files
passed.
- Real browser: Connectors → 1Password → token entry → personal access
limited to one disposable agent → completion → Permissions → Test
`onepassword_list_vaults` succeeded. The disposable connection was
removed afterward.
- Compiled-worker smoke initially exposed inherited Node launch flags.
Workers now use explicit empty `execArgv`; the compiled worker then
authenticated successfully and listed one vault.
- Live write proof on **2026-10-23**: the replacement Keychain token
passed all eight actions through the actual run-scoped gateway for both
personal and shared credentials. The test created, listed, read,
updated, resolved a secret from, archived, and deleted two synthetic
items. Both were absent from subsequent item lists. Refresh/reconnect,
identity preservation, removal, retained-session denial, and credential
absence passed. The live suite passed **3 tests** (one fixture-only test
skipped) in 116.65 seconds. The expanded fixture suite passed **3
tests** (one live-only test skipped); the 13 provider tests and server
typecheck passed. An exact-token scan passed over 64 source/log files.
- Failure history: the original token denied creation on 2026-10-22 and
created no item. The first 2026-10-23 attempt stopped before provider
calls because host PostgreSQL semaphore limits prevented test-database
startup. A temporary ten-connection test profile allowed the complete
retry to pass without changing shared services or host limits. A new
delete-result assertion also exposed an outdated fixture response
(`success` instead of `deleted`); the fixture was corrected and the
complete fixture suite passed.

Official contract sources: [service
accounts](https://www.1password.dev/service-accounts/get-started),
[SDKs](https://www.1password.dev/sdks), [item
management](https://www.1password.dev/sdks/manage-items), [official
JavaScript SDK](https://github.com/1Password/onepassword-sdk-js).

## Risks

- Authorized item/secret reads intentionally return secret values to the
agent and ordinary tool-result history. Select trusted agents and use
restricted service-account vaults; the connection token itself is
redacted.
- New connections retain existing Paperclip action defaults, including
Allowed writes/destructive actions for selected agents. 1Password still
enforces the token's permissions.
- Service-account access cannot be changed in place. Create a
replacement account and reconnect to change vault permissions; read-only
keys can connect but cannot write.
- SDK authentication happens per action in a disposable worker. Calls
have a 30-second maximum; cancellation stops local work, while a
mutation already accepted by 1Password can still finish. Writes are
never automatically retried.
- Additive dependency and catalog change; no database migration.
Disable/remove the connection to withdraw access, or remove the provider
from catalog visibility for rollback.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with code editing, shell/browser tools,
and live provider verification. A more specific runtime model ID and
context-window limit were not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-23 13:27:33 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 9c442cf48e feat(connections): deploy and configure Supabase and Vercel (#17217)
Add governed Supabase and Vercel deployment/configuration connectors with vaulted credentials, agent access policies, approvals, audit, and bounded provider operations.

Deliver reviewed REST actions to native agents and guard Vercel preview intent on empty projects. Preserve secret-safe request identity and durable retry behavior.

Verified by current-head CI, fresh Greptile 5/5 review, and real-agent deployment/configuration walkthroughs on disposable provider resources. Test resources and temporary provider tokens were removed after verification.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-23 11:37:29 -07:00
Devin Foley 059ae49cab feat(connections): add Unikraft Cloud connection (#17139)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Apps connections give agents governed access to external services
through vault credentials, grants, action policies, the tool gateway,
and audit.
> - Unikraft Cloud runs unikernel micro-VMs, services, and volumes
across regional metros, and it offers a sandbox plugin for commands and
files.
> - Unikraft is not in the catalog. It has no hosted MCP server, so the
generic "Connect your own MCP server" flow cannot reach it.
> - Daytona (#16483) added a native REST pattern for this case: a
catalog generated from the provider's published OpenAPI specifications
and executed through the gateway.
> - This pull request adds Unikraft on that pattern and moves the shared
native-provider code into one registry, so the shared connection code
does not name each provider.
> - The benefit is governed agent access to all published Unikraft
actions, with the token kept in the vault and sent only to published
Unikraft hosts.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #16483

**Problem or motivation**

Teams that run workloads on Unikraft Cloud want their agents to list
instances, read logs, deploy and scale services, and run commands in
sandboxes. Unikraft is not in the Apps catalog. Unikraft has no hosted
MCP server, so operators cannot connect it through the remote MCP flow.

**Proposed solution**

Add a native Unikraft connection. Generate its actions from Unikraft's
official OpenAPI specifications for the platform API and the sandbox
plugin. Pin the specifications to a reviewed commit. The operator
connects an API token. The token stays in the vault and goes only to the
five published metro hosts. Every action takes an optional metro.
Actions without a metro use the connection's default metro, which the
operator can change under Advanced.

**Alternatives considered**

A catalog-only AppDefinition was not possible because no hosted MCP
endpoint exists. Wrapping the `unikraft` CLI was rejected because it
would expose host filesystem behavior and CLI login state. A second copy
of the Daytona bridge was rejected; the shared transport and catalog
contract are now one module with a provider registry.

**Roadmap alignment**

This extends the existing Apps and Connections provider coverage. It
uses the existing credential, grant, policy, gateway, and audit model.
It does not overlap planned core work.

## What Changed

- Added `scripts/generate-unikraft-tools.mjs` and its tests. The
generator reads the platform and sandbox plugin specifications at commit
`5dd107ea1cd8716b83cb86a83ed2a6ee46f99b5b`, resolves shared parameters,
records source SHA-256 hashes, and writes
`server/src/services/unikraft/operations.generated.json`.
- The catalog has 105 actions: 89 platform operations and 16 sandbox
plugin operations. The server-sent audit event stream is recorded in the
inventory and is not advertised as an action.
- Classification: GET operations and sandbox reads and waits are reads.
Delete, stop, suspend, detach, unpin, and sandbox command execution,
signals, and stdin are destructive. All other operations are writes.
- Added `server/src/services/connectors/unikraft/client.ts` and its
generated catalog. It validates arguments against the generated schemas,
accepts only published metros, rejects path traversal, sends JSON bodies
on GET and DELETE as the specification requires, and verifies the token
with `GET /v1/users/quotas`. A sandbox wait that times out (documented
HTTP 408) returns a still-running result instead of a failure.
- Moved the bounded, credential-redacting HTTP sender and the catalog
contract helpers from `daytona.ts` to `native-rest-client.ts`. Added
`native-provider-catalogs.ts`. `tool-access.ts`, the
`tool-access/catalog` and `token-broker` modules,
`connectors/tool-policy.ts`, and `tool-gateway.ts` now use this registry
instead of Daytona-specific checks. Daytona behavior does not change.
- Added the Unikraft definition source, the generated definition, the
brand mark and manifest entry, and the permission review (`liveProof:
not-run`).
- Added `doc/connections/UNIKRAFT.md` with a sequence diagram,
endpoints, setup, actions, and limits. Updated the connections README,
the permission audit, and both capability maps.
- Tests: definition shape, database-backed gateway reads, writes,
deletes, and sandbox commands for personal and shared grants, default
and per-call metros, rejection of unpublished metros and traversal, Off
policies, revocation, stale-contract blocking, credential export denial,
schema validation for all actions, pinned-transport tests for GET and
DELETE bodies, and a browser setup check.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src
server/src/__tests__/unikraft-connection.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/unikraft-http-boundary.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/daytona-connection.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/daytona-http-boundary.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/tool-gateway-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/tool-gateway.test.ts
ui/src/pages/apps/AppsConnect.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/Browse.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/app-brand-assets.test.ts` plus `connector-tool-policy` and
`tool-catalog-publication`: all passed after the rebase onto the split
tool-access modules.
- `node --test scripts/generate-unikraft-tools.test.mjs
scripts/generate-daytona-tools.test.mjs
scripts/app-brand-validation.test.mjs`: 20 passed.
- `node scripts/check-app-brand-assets.mjs`, `node
scripts/check-maps.mjs`, and `git diff --check`: passed.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck`, `pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/server typecheck`, and `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui
typecheck`: clean.
- `npx playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts
tests/e2e/unikraft-connector.spec.ts
tests/e2e/daytona-connector.spec.ts`: 2 passed.
- `node scripts/generate-unikraft-tools.mjs` regenerates the committed
catalog with the recorded hashes.
- Manual: on a local instance, open Connectors, search for Unikraft, and
select **Add key**. Confirm the icon, the password field, the key
guidance, and the default metro select under **Change**.
- Not verified: a real Unikraft account. Live provider read and write
proof is pending.

## Risks

- A Unikraft token acts for the whole organization in every metro.
Unikraft offers no narrower token permissions. Assign only trusted
agents and review action permissions.
- Sandbox actions run arbitrary commands inside the selected instance.
They are classified as destructive.
- A timed-out write can still complete at the provider. The bridge does
not retry writes automatically.
- New metros fail closed until the specification is regenerated and
reviewed. Legacy `*.kraft.cloud` hosts are not reachable.
- The Daytona refactor moves code without behavior changes. All Daytona
tests pass without edits.
- The generated JSON snapshot is large because it holds the provider
input contracts. No migration or lockfile change is required.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, 1M context
window, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file editing, web
research, browser tests).

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-10-22 15:14:26 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 92cfd701c3 feat: add governed Braintrust app connections (#17141)
Add hosted US and EU Braintrust OAuth and API-key connections through the existing governed MCP system.

Keep reviewed tool risks and catalog review policy in connector modules and a narrow registry. Preserve credential ownership, operator decisions, regional setup and changed-tool quarantine. Include official artwork, setup guidance, focused regressions and sanitized qualification evidence.

US OAuth has bounded live read/write, gateway, reconnect and cleanup proof. Remaining account-method and token-lifecycle qualification gaps are documented.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-21 16:19:58 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 3ce8d976a9 Add experimental Paperclip Notebook MCP connection (#16984)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip connects agents to external tools through saved accounts
and per-action permissions.
> - Notebook exposes artifact management through an ordinary remote MCP
server with OAuth.
> - A private pilot needs a hidden, default-off catalog and execution
gate.
> - Local file publishing belongs to Notebook, which can accept bounded
file bytes through ordinary MCP tools.
> - Paperclip therefore needs the connector registration and generic
availability checks, with no file-transfer architecture.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Apps catalog, experimental feature metadata, connection setup, and
connector availability.

**Problem or motivation**

Users need to connect Notebook as their Cloud account, assign its tools
to agents, and retain Paperclip's normal Allowed / Ask first / Off
rules. The private pilot must remain hidden until an operator enables
it. Notebook should own its upload protocol and local publishing script.

**Proposed solution**

Register a personal remote MCP OAuth connection at Notebook's canonical
endpoint. Reuse existing OAuth discovery, credential storage, refresh,
reconnect, and removal. Enforce availability through generic catalog
feature metadata and saved application identity. Keep Notebook's
standalone uploader in its own service repository; it calls the ordinary
gateway and receives no saved OAuth credential.

**Alternatives considered**

A gallery-only filter permits retained tools and deep links while
disabled. A shared workspace publisher and private upload-ticket
transport add runtime behavior that a normal MCP connector does not
require. Notebook can receive file bytes directly through its own tools
instead.

**Roadmap alignment**

This extends Connected Apps and supports Artifacts and Work Products.
ROADMAP.md and related PRs were checked. This PR is standalone on
master. The separate OAuth lifecycle and file-transfer proposals (#17085
and #17086) are closed and are not dependencies.

## What Changed

- Register Notebook's personal MCP OAuth method, canonical endpoint,
scopes, catalog metadata, and branding.
- Declare managed `enablePaperclipNotebook` with false defaults and no
user-facing settings toggle or staging opt-in.
- Use generic availability metadata for gallery/setup, retained
connection identity, OAuth completion, health, tool/context discovery,
and dispatch. Resources/prompts recheck before credentials, including
retained handles. Removal remains available while disabled.
- Resolve catalog application identity from the saved application key,
so editable connection labels cannot bypass the hidden gate.
- Select a method's sole supported credential kind when no kind is
supplied.
- Keep UI changes to metadata-driven availability and existing
setup/reconnect controls.
- Document Notebook's service-owned upload script, inline publication,
ordinary action policies, and credential behavior.
- Add ordinary MCP OAuth, assignment, action-policy, disabled-state,
settings, and catalog tests.

No workspace contribution registry, private transfer endpoint, native
publisher, Runner file-reader change, or Paperclip CLI upload command is
included. The entire native-runtime and CLI trees match master. Upload
code lives in `paperclip-cloud/notebook/`.

## Verification

Source head: `65ef741e4f476c67425b57d2fb2d6d4c00e99b06`, directly on
master `53732c811bb69655eb43d3d12f2063ae4ca5ad67`. The diff is 42 files.
Shared execution changes only enforce generic catalog availability; tool
access also resolves saved application identity and the sole supported
credential kind. Neither module contains Notebook upload logic.

- Catalog/shared/settings/UI suites: 592 tests passed across 12 files.
Shared/server/UI typechecks passed using installed compilers.
- Fresh real PostgreSQL generic MCP suite: 84/84 passed at final source;
server typecheck and module boundaries pass. Coverage includes personal
OAuth, ordinary refresh/reconnect, assignments, Allowed / Ask first /
Off, hidden feature enforcement, and local credential removal. Four new
resources/prompts cases failed against the prior code and pass after
filtering saved application identity and rechecking before credentials.
They prove missing/relabelled setup markers and stale eligibility cannot
dispatch or read secrets while disabled; an ordinary provider remains
available with the flag off.
- The full tool-access service suite passed 463/464 cases. One unchanged
Google Workspace `slides.write` case timed out at 15 seconds; it passed
on one isolated retry without source or timeout changes. Its exact test
block matches master. The cause is not established; final-head CI must
qualify the complete suite.
- Maps, module boundaries, token gates, and whitespace checks passed.
Byte comparisons confirm the former transfer/runtime/CLI surfaces match
master.
- Fresh exact-head Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved findings after
an exhaustive feedback audit. Current-head CI workflow
[39625691137](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39625691137)
succeeded, including both required checks (`ci / verify`, `ci / e2e`),
Build, and browser E2E. Supplementary security/advisory scan status is
recorded in the PR Checks panel and qualification receipt; prior-head
scans are not counted. The superseded `4bd7af9b2e` completed CI
successfully, but Greptile found the valid resources/prompts
availability gap described above. It was fixed, replied to, and
resolved; earlier-head results do not qualify this revision.

Preserved environment failures: the first socket-restricted UI/route run
had 93 listener setup failures, and the same 93 cases passed with
local-socket access. The package-manager launcher could not fetch its
signature metadata; installed compilers passed without dependency or
configuration changes. The full service timeout and isolated retry
remain recorded separately. The superseded `585e870e73` CI also failed
an unchanged agent-chat project-plan revision assertion after task
creation; the complete spec and relevant runtime sources match master,
and a same-master prior run passed. Its cause is not established. Logs
are preserved; no test or timeout was weakened and no old-head rerun was
requested. The subsequent heads run full CI independently; no prior-head
pass substitutes for current qualification.

The Notebook uploader requires a separate service release. This public
PR adds no uploader runtime to Paperclip and claims no newly deployed
browser/agent acceptance. The Notebook-owned upload path is qualified
separately. Code-owner review remains required before merge.

## Risks

- The feature flag gates the curated connector; it does not create a
Notebook service-side team allowlist or block arbitrary standard MCP
URLs.
- Publishing, sharing, and deletion retain the existing assignment and
action-policy boundaries.
- The hidden feature must be checked for retained tools and saved
identity, including when connection labels change.
- Disconnect removes local credentials. It does not revoke the remote
Notebook authorization; the owner can revoke it in Notebook.
- Ordinary refresh uses the existing client. A lost response after
refresh-token rotation can require reconnect.
- The standalone Notebook script and its bounded upload tools must ship
together in the Notebook service before that documented convenience path
is available.
- No database schema, workflow, lockfile, shared transfer, or Runner
change is included. No merge, deployment, or rollout is performed by
this update.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code
execution, and tool use. The runtime did not expose a more specific
model ID or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-21 11:07:18 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 9ef434fe79 docs: expose feature map IDs and add a recipe index (#16987)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Its feature map describes user journeys and their verification
paths.
> - The map already defines feature IDs and full capability IDs.
> - The README and child pages did not show those IDs consistently.
> - Readers need those IDs to connect issues, tests, stories, and
evidence.
> - This pull request adds a recipe index and displays the existing IDs.
> - The benefit is clear references across the product and agent access
maps.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Issue type**

Missing documentation.

**Where is the issue?**

`maps/feature-map/README.md`, the child recipes, and their agent access
companions.

**What's wrong?**

The README sends readers to Storybook to browse features. Child pages
show local keys, such as `installation`, without the full
`plugins/installation` ID. Readers must inspect the generator to find
the full reference.

**Suggested fix**

List recipe links and existing IDs in the README. Show each feature ID
and full capability ID in its child pages. Explain capability IDs and
entry-point references. Keep the current keys and anchors.

Related work: Refs #15288. Refs #16052. Refs #15983. No duplicate open
PR or issue was found by title search.

## What Changed

- Add an index grouped by feature area. It lists every recipe, feature
ID, and full capability ID.
- Explain how IDs are formed and used in issues, tests, Storybook, and
evidence.
- Add feature IDs to all product recipes and agent access companions.
- Show full capability IDs beside recipe keys and below access and
Storybook guidance headings.
- Preserve existing keys, heading anchors, and generated ID values. Keep
the latest upstream company capability in the index.

## Verification

- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passes for 34 feature families and 175
capability IDs.
- `node --test scripts/check-maps.test.mjs
scripts/storybook-feature-index.test.mjs` passes all 17 tests.
- `node scripts/storybook-feature-index.mjs` passes on this checkout and
generates the feature indexes and overview inputs.
- `git diff --check` passes.
- A source comparison confirms that the README matches the recipe index.
After removal of the added ID labels, all 68 child pages match the
upstream prose and headings.
- Full workspace checks were attempted: `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm
test:run`, and `pnpm build`. They could not start because the local pnpm
wrapper could not fetch and verify the pinned pnpm 9.15.4 release. This
checkout also has no workspace dependencies installed.
- `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs` could not run because
`storybook/internal/csf-tools` is not installed. The direct map and
index checks above pass without that dependency.
- Remote typecheck, release-registry, and full build checks passed. The
first attempts of [server shard
3/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39460473910/job/118758430448)
and [server shard
12/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39460473910/job/118758429932)
stopped after their runners received a shutdown signal. The test steps
were canceled. GitHub rejects the rerun request with HTTP 403: "The
workflow run containing this job is already running". Five other CI jobs
remain active. The next action is to rerun the two interrupted shards
after workflow 39460473910 ends. No application changes were made to
address these runner interruptions.
- To inspect the result, open the feature-map README, follow a recipe
link, and compare its full capability IDs with its access companion.

## Risks

- Low risk. The change updates map documentation only. It changes no
application code or ID schema.
- The readable README index and child labels repeat source IDs. Keep
them aligned when a capability changes.
- Generated capability descriptions now include the visible ID prefix.
Generated IDs, labels, navigation order, and verification fields remain
the same.
- Full local workspace checks and catalog generation remain unverified
for the environment reasons above.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, model `gpt-6.1-sol`, with a 475,000-token context window
and `xhigh` reasoning effort. The model used local file tools, shell
commands, and GitHub CLI access.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-20 12:00:36 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 2c96f76780 feat(connections): add model-backed prompt injection prevention
Add opt-in OpenRouter checks at existing tool-result boundaries with regex fallback, service accounting, and settings on Connections. Make migration 0362 safe to replay over existing or partially applied schema state.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-20 11:32:25 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 0b62c736a0 feat(connections): add generic Daytona API and Toolbox access (#16483)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Apps connections give agents controlled access to external services.
> - Daytona provides sandbox, file, command, Git, and account APIs.
> - Operators need to assign this access without exposing a server
credential.
> - A small task-specific tool list cannot serve general Daytona work.
> - This pull request adds the published HTTP actions through the
existing connection gateway.
> - Operators keep control of identity, agent access, and each action.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Problem or motivation**

Paperclip has a Daytona sandbox provider for its own execution
infrastructure. It lacks a normal Apps connection for agents to manage
an operator's Daytona account. Reusing the server's provider credential
would bypass normal connection ownership and action permissions.

**Proposed solution**

Add a Daytona connection with personal or shared vault credentials.
Generate its action catalog from the official platform and Toolbox API
specifications. Use the existing run-bound gateway, grants, action
policies, approvals, revocation, and audit paths. Sandbox IDs come from
Daytona; tools need no Paperclip task or lease ID.

**Alternatives considered**

A four-action diagnostic subset cannot support general provider work.
Launching the provider CLI would expose host filesystem behavior. Native
OAuth is not included because a supported third-party registration path
was not verified. The native method uses an organization API key.
Existing Composio setup is a separate possible OAuth route and is not
qualified by this change.

**Roadmap alignment**

This extends the existing Apps and Connections provider coverage in
`ROADMAP.md`. It uses that system's credential and permission model.
GitHub searches found no existing Daytona Apps connector PR or issue.

## What Changed

- Add the Daytona catalog entry, provider source override, official
theme logos, permission review, and setup documentation.
- Generate 274 HTTP actions: 169 platform and 105 Toolbox operations.
Record two WebSocket upgrades separately; do not advertise them as HTTP
tools. Record source URLs and hashes.
- Add provider-focused execution for sandboxes, snapshots, volumes,
files, Git, commands, computer use, and account resources. Provider
authority still limits which endpoints accept an organization key.
- Validate action arguments. Resolve Toolbox targets through the fixed
platform API. Check sandbox identity and organization before using an
approved Daytona proxy. Keep normal guarded network requests and vault
resolution.
- Transfer file bytes without reading or writing host files. Share one
caller deadline across prerequisite reads, dispatch, and response
reading. Bound requests and responses. Do not automatically retry writes
with unknown outcomes. Redact the selected credential from results and
errors.
- Classify credential access, access changes, interactive input, command
execution, file permissions, and deletion (including TTL and
auto-delete) as destructive actions. Keep new and changed actions under
catalog review.
- Upgrade saved catalogs and retire the earlier diagnostic names. Hide
retired actions from the UI and agent discovery even when provider
refresh fails. Preserve existing action choices and historical records.
Reject stale same-name contracts during agent discovery and dispatch
before a board refresh.
- Add database-backed gateway and catalog-upgrade regressions, schema
generator tests, a browser setup check, and both capability map updates.

## Verification

- Passed on the review-fix head: 57 focused Vitest cases (18 Daytona
database/client cases, five HTTP boundary cases, and 34 shared catalog
cases), four generator tests, `pnpm -r typecheck`, and `pnpm build`. The
five HTTP cases use a real local server through the pinned production
transport. The normal browser setup check and 17 generator/artwork cases
passed on the initial PR head; those UI and artwork paths are unchanged.
- Passed on this branch: brand asset validation, token gates, map
structure checks, and `git diff --check`. All latest-head GitHub checks
pass on `ea979ccb3a64dc9508807823540f935c4316ea35`. Apex is 5/5, with
all five findings addressed and zero unresolved threads. The branch has
no merge conflicts.
- The initial catalog-generation command could not find the external
research corpus. The supported `--definitions-only` mode regenerated the
definitions successfully. Unrelated generated drift was excluded.
- An earlier full local Vitest attempt on the preview branch failed when
bundled PostgreSQL could not start on macOS. After replay onto current
master, all three unchanged event-sequencing cases pass with bundled
PostgreSQL; the earlier startup cause remains uncertain.
- The first full-suite command on this branch used my external test
database override. Chat fixtures require a current migrated schema and
failed because `agents.lifecycle_state` was absent in that disposable
database. A focused comparison reproduces failure with the override and
passes with normal setup. That attempt was stopped, and the full suite
restarted without the override. Focused Daytona cases use their own
migrated PostgreSQL 16 databases.
- The clean local full-suite attempt recorded embedded PostgreSQL
startup failures in two unchanged native-runtime cases and two failures
in unchanged Git fixtures. It was stopped after these failures were
isolated; no full local suite pass is claimed. The 15 matching
native-runtime cases pass separately. The Git cases fail with the local
`init.defaultBranch=main` setting and pass with `GIT_CONFIG_COUNT=1
GIT_CONFIG_KEY_0=init.defaultBranch GIT_CONFIG_VALUE_0=master` limited
to the test command. No global Git setting was changed. Full Linux CI is
green.
- Fixtures use real database persistence and run-bound gateway sessions
with provider responses replaced by fixtures. They cover personal/shared
vault ownership, reads and writes, file bytes, Off policies, revocation,
organization mismatch, untrusted proxy rejection, output bounds, saved
catalog upgrades, failed refresh, and permission preservation.
- The first Apex review found five valid issues: multipart transport
compatibility, destructive classification, caller deadlines, audit
filters, and stale saved contracts. All five were fixed with regressions
before the second review. A typecheck then found the nullable saved
schema hash; admission now accepts that stored type and rejects null as
stale.
- The browser check covers setup controls without submitting a provider
key. No real Daytona account, provider write, native OAuth flow, or
agent model run is qualified. Live provider read/write proof remains
pending a test account.

## Risks

- Daytona keys have broad Toolbox authority, including keys with no
selected resource scopes. Only assign this connection to trusted agents
and review its action permissions.
- Remote writes or commands can continue after a timeout. Calls do not
automatically retry an uncertain outcome.
- The bridge targets Daytona Cloud. Proxy hosts are restricted; an
unrecognized future regional host fails closed.
- Files and responses have an 8 MiB bound. Each action has one caller
deadline, capped at 30 seconds across all provider requests and response
reading. Interactive WebSocket sessions are not exposed as HTTP actions.
- The generated JSON snapshot exceeds 1,000 lines because it holds the
provider input contracts. Generator logic and execution code remain in
separate small modules. Updates require explicit regeneration and
catalog review.
- No database migration or lockfile change is required.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The runtime identifies the model family but does
not expose the exact backend model ID or context window. Used reasoning,
repository inspection, code editing, shell tools, database verification,
and browser tests.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-15 14:05:26 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 833769ab55 perf(chat): schedule Telegram maintenance from commits and deadlines (#16094)
Replace periodic Telegram discovery and maintenance scans with bounded startup recovery, connection-specific commit notifications, and durable action deadlines. Preserve ownership, inactive subscription parking, retry and cleanup recovery, and atomic credential binding updates.

Verified full typecheck/build, 30 focused scheduler tests, 12 database-backed recovery cases, all current-head CI checks, and Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved threads.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-13 07:55:27 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 7d9b93aee2 docs: establish paired feature and agent access maps (#16025)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Contributors use the feature map to understand and verify product
capabilities.
> - Agents need APIs and usable entry points within their permission
boundaries.
> - Product recipes and agent access need separate records with shared
capability IDs.
> - This pull request establishes that contract and gives maintenance
ownership of both maps.
> - The benefit is repeatable access review without changing product
behavior or permissions.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #15983, which added the portable verification skills and updated
the feature map. This is its contract-only follow-up. Related: #15288
added the original feature map.

**Issue type**

Missing documentation and maintenance contract.

**Where is the issue?**

The product map, its missing agent access companions, and the
verification skills.

**What's wrong?**

There is no shared convention for API presence, agent entry points,
permission boundaries, access gaps, or evidence. An API declaration does
not prove that a permitted native or remote agent can use it.

**Suggested fix**

Keep the product and agent access maps as siblings under `maps/`. Reuse
capability IDs. Record representative source inventory separately from
operation review and live proof. Keep both maps aligned through the
maintenance skill.

## What Changed

- Move the existing product map to `maps/feature-map/`. Preserve its
recipes and Poteto format. Update relative links and add companion
links.
- Add `maps/agent-access-map/` with 35 area files and 171 matching
capability IDs. Seed representative API operations, agent paths,
policies and known gaps from the reviewed source inventory. Mark entries
as `baseline`, `source-only`, and live verification `not-run`.
- Define the shared contract in `maps/README.md`. Track API presence,
agent availability, policy, evidence and review depth separately.
Require operation enumeration before marking a broad capability
operation-reviewed.
- Extend `maintain-verification-skill` to reconcile both maps and
inspect actual route policy and production tool admission. Update
creation, verification, notices and contributor references to use the
shared contract.
- Add `scripts/check-maps.mjs` and ten regression tests. Check matching
areas/IDs, indexes, references, contract fields, API method/path
examples, justified exceptions and evidence-state consistency.
- Keep the coverage inventory unchanged. Preserve skill invocation
policies and both MIT license blocks. No product API, permission, UI,
runtime helper, migration, dependency or workflow changes.

## Verification

- Passed: `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` reports 35 paired areas and 171
matching capability IDs. All local map references resolve.
- Passed: `node --test scripts/check-maps.test.mjs` runs ten tests.
Fixtures cover missing companions, renamed/orphan/duplicate IDs, broken
references, missing operation fields, empty exceptions, missing API
examples, empty policy fields, and verified evidence without passed
verification.
- Passed: metadata validation for all three verification skills. Skill
and contributor links resolve. Invocation policies and both license
blocks are unchanged.
- Compared relocated recipes with current master. Contents differ only
in relative links and companion links. `coverage.json` is byte-for-byte
unchanged. Master's updated read-only interaction test reference is
retained.
- Passed: `git diff --check`. The branch starts from current master and
contains only this contract change.
- Repository-wide typecheck, tests and build were not run locally for
this documentation and Node structural-check scope. Live agent access
was not exercised. Those gaps are explicit in the baseline entries; the
structural check does not certify behavior. CI and automated review are
pending.

## Risks

- The companions are representative source baselines. They are not
complete operation inventories or passed agent journeys.
- The checker cannot establish actual permissions, native tool
admission, operation completeness or truthful live evidence. Maintenance
must inspect source and verify with the actual permitted agent context.
- External links to the old product-map directory may need updates.
Repository references have been updated.
- Existing access gaps and board/user restrictions remain recorded. This
contract does not change authority or implement missing paths.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex assisted with this change. The session does
not expose the exact serving model ID, configured context-window size,
or reasoning setting. Capabilities used: source analysis, file edits,
shell commands, and structural regression tests.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 14:52:28 -05:00