2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
DottaandPaperclip	3bd709df8b	Operationalize Product E2E accounting, tracing, and scheduling (#17009) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and the work they perform. > - Product E2E tests exercise real agents, tools, setup and cleanup. > - Repeated runs need retained costs and traces, including failed attempts. > - A passing retry must not hide earlier spending or feedback. > - Recurring work also needs admission limits, private reports and failure detection. > - This change supplies those controls while keeping paid activation behind existing gates. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #16996 and #17158. This is the consolidated landing of the reviewed eval operations stack: #17019, #17024, #17025, #17027, #17030, #17033, #17035, #17038, #17043, #17044, #17048, #17050, #17051, #17092, #17096, #17100, #17107, #17109, #17112, #17115, #17117, #17121, #17123, #17127, #17130, #17133, #17134, #17137, #17140, #17143, #17154. The repository permits squash merges only. A local rehearsal showed that squashing each slice into master causes repeated conflicts in dependent slices. This PR preserves their commits and lands their combined implementation in one reviewed integration. Superseded slices will close after this merge. ## What Changed - Retain every attempt's cost receipt, including setup, failures, interruptions and retries. Separate reported amounts, estimates, missing costs and reserved capacity in reports and dashboards. - Add bounded request admission, exact model pricecards, gateway error accounting, cache policy and reconciliation evidence. Refuse unsupported routes and requests that cannot fit the allowance. - Integrate Braintrust gateway traces and OTLP correlation, with secret filtering and experiment imports. Record phase timing, including setup, feedback capture and cleanup. - Collect complaint and suggestion evidence after each attempt, including recovery after failures. Retain explicit review dispositions independently from the product grade. - Add gated daily and weekly selections, measured forecasts, setup/readiness checks, wall-time limits and retained monitor notifications. Include declared non-model overhead in admission while reporting the existing subscription separately. - Keep recurring history private, bound uploads and retention, and use isolated archive environments. Keep public publication an explicit operation. Report and publication jobs install only the committed lockfile, with scripts disabled and isolated stores; stale pins fail closed. - Integrate current master, preserve its Product E2E journey billing and privacy checks, and test that shared setup receipts do not double-count estimated agent usage. Preserve upstream fixture repairs. ## Verification - Complete integration baseline `0649a5ce7544ab20825c2183d2f421157db49f24` includes master `a3e1d915a7110a4e115b46396a3f79e6dfb4d05e` and every original stack head as ancestors. - On that integration baseline, `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit`: 4,012 Vitest tests passed, two skipped, across 193 files; all 137 Node source-contract tests passed. - Focused billing and Product E2E journey contract checks: 24 tests passed. They cover estimates, unknown receipts, single-owner setup costs, browser-only execution and private publication guards. - Monitor and workflow wiring: all 96 Node tests passed. `node scripts/check-token-gates.mjs`: all gates clean. - `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck` passes after the standard Runner TypeScript build refreshed local declarations. The first attempt rejected the new master `runner_prepared_launch` union member because this checkout retained an older generated declaration; the source union already contained that member. - Current head `492b0708a1c531a023d9ac10f0f3dc6383cc1754` removes dependency re-resolution from archive-authorized reporting jobs after the security scan flagged it. All 15 workflow-security tests pass after updating the old two-install assertion. - Hosted [CI run 39965460180](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39965460180) passes on the current repaired head, including typecheck, build, general tests, Runner checks, browser shards and canary dry run. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact head with no unresolved threads. The security scan passes after the fixed lockfile-resolution thread was resolved. - Paperclip Review returned a terminal neutral check but an incomplete 0-file assessment on the repaired head: its platform blocked both diff responses as prompt-injection content. This is not a successful code review. No bypass or fabricated pass was attempted; current-head Greptile, security and hosted CI are independent gates. - No paid test, reservation release or recurring-run activation accompanies this landing. Live route qualification and invoice reconciliation remain separate evidence. <details> <summary>Retained earlier validation failures</summary> Earlier broad local runs had two 15-second test timeouts (CLI poll cadence and Retry validation), one embedded-database setup timeout, and later PostgreSQL semaphore exhaustion. The exact timed-out tests passed separately without larger timeouts; the broad-run causes were not established. Those local failures remain distinct from subsequent hosted CI results. The independent #17158 fix records its Muse fixture collision, its UUID correction and hosted verification. Local Muse execution was also blocked by macOS embedded-PostgreSQL startup. No historical failure is treated as a successful paid qualification. </details> ## Risks - Admission is a local control, not a provider invoice cap. Missing provider receipts or resource charges retain unknown amounts and holds; estimates do not become billed dollars. - The bounded path admits only documented local suites and provider routes. Ordinary legacy or separate Runner protocol campaigns have different controls. Merging this code does not qualify additional routes. - Recurrence still needs the existing enable gates and current qualification/allowance evidence. Archive permissions and resources must match the documented private-environment contract. - Legacy reports may lack complete attempt or phase evidence. Reports preserve that limitation and do not infer zero usage from missing data. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools and code execution. The exact deployment variant and context-window size are not exposed by this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (targeted checks; full-suite host limitation disclosed above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-23 07:18:37 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip	f89c37791c	Add campaign sidebar and case navigation to runner E2E reports (#17010) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Product E2E campaigns test runner behavior across agent profiles and environments. > - The retained reports contain many suites, cases, and execution previews. > - A long report makes it hard to find a case or return to the campaign context. > - This pull request adds campaign navigation, case breadcrumbs, and separate global history pages. > - Users can scan all execution previews or inspect one case without losing their place. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Navigation in the retained Runner E2E campaign reports and history homepage. **Subsystem affected** Test report infrastructure in `tests/runner-e2e/`. **Current behavior** Reports show a long configuration matrix. The suite index and campaign history share the same page. Case links do not provide a focused inspection view. **Proposed behavior** Global overview, history, and attention pages show global navigation. A specific campaign adds a folding suite tree. All results keeps the full scrollable report. A case opens with breadcrumbs and an execution picker. **Reason and benefit** Users can find a case, compare its executions, and return to their reading position. Global pages do not show suites from an unrelated campaign. **Breaking changes** The report HTML layout changes. Retained result schemas, execution identities, and suite and execution anchors remain unchanged. **Additional context** Refs: #16996. This extends the merged report navigation and local preview work. The duplicate PR and issue search found no open PR for this change. ## What Changed - Add shared report navigation with the Paperclip brand mark and wordmark. - Scope the suite tree to the current campaign. Keep global overview, history, and attention pages separate. - Group all execution previews by suite and case. Reuse the existing evidence cards and image gallery. - Add focused case inspection, configuration selection, breadcrumbs, filter handling, and scroll restoration. - Move historical trends to the global history page. Keep billing details, missing results, and failure evidence available. - Update report documentation and browser regressions for filters, status dots, configuration reloads, breadcrumbs, and scroll restoration. ## Verification - [Final CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39500401411) passes on `89a8b5c290de3cfb9bdc061be3c88a29fd160a62`. Typecheck, build, runner checks, server suites, and all browser shards pass. - All four report browser regressions pass. They cover filters, gallery navigation, repeated suite jumps, the folding sidebar, breadcrumbs, scroll restoration, configuration selection and reload, mobile navigation, and aggregate case status. - The 63 report, history, preview-boundary, and navigation tests pass. Runner E2E typecheck passes with `node node_modules/typescript/bin/tsc -p tests/runner-e2e/tsconfig.json`. - Manual browser checks covered desktop and a 390-pixel viewport. Retained campaigns covered 209 executions in eight suites, 179 executions in seven suites, and 15 executions in one suite. Browser fixture checks also confirmed filtered inspection and aggregate status. No paid evaluations ran. - The initial report browser tests still targeted the old layout and routes. They were updated for the new navigation. Review also exposed filtered-inspection and aggregate-status defects; both were fixed before the final passing browser run. - The unchanged Cases UI grouping test [failed once on the final head](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39500401411/job/118898559197). Its full file also failed locally, while the isolated test passed. The same UI code passed in earlier CI. A [single CI retry](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39500401411/job/118903333430) passed all 3,978 UI tests and 286 CLI tests without code changes. The cause remains unresolved. - Two jobs on an intermediate head were interrupted by runner shutdown signals. Those remain interrupted results. The complete final-head CI run supersedes them for merge verification. - Workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` also passed locally before the rebase. The full local `pnpm test:run` attempt encountered repeated embedded PostgreSQL startup failures and was stopped. It is not a passing local full-suite result; final CI provides the full verification. ## Risks - Navigation and hash handling can select the wrong case or hide results. Focused tests and browser checks cover these paths. - Historical campaign links must resolve from both the preview and published report locations. - The report layout changes. Graders, prompts, retained outcomes, and billing calculations do not change. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex with `gpt-6-astra` and `gpt-6.1-sol`. Used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser verification. The runtime did not expose a context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-20 16:50:53 -05:00