2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
DottaandPaperclip	952ecdbb39	feat(ui): show assignee avatars in task lists (#18607) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - People use task lists to see who owns each task. > - The shared task table shows an assignee name without a picture. > - A picture helps people find an agent or person when they scan the list. > - This pull request shows the existing avatar beside the assignee name. > - The table uses the same image and fallback components as other identity views. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The Assignee column in the shared task table. **Subsystem affected** `ui/` — the task table and its page data. **Current behavior** The column shows only an assignee name. People must read each name to find an owner. **Proposed behavior** Show the agent avatar or human profile image beside the name when the Assignee column is visible. Use the existing fallback if an image is missing. Show no avatar for an unassigned task. **Reason and benefit** People can use the same identity pictures throughout the app. This helps them scan task ownership. **Breaking changes** None. The API, task assignment, name sorting, and filters keep their existing contracts. **Additional context** Related work: #2422 adds agent avatar URL support. It does not add avatars to this table. #13319 aligns icons in task properties. This change uses the existing identity components. ## What Changed - Pass agent appearance and human profile images from existing company data to the task table. - Keep the avatar visible beside a long name as the name scrolls on hover or focus. - Respect the Assignee column setting and keep unassigned rows without avatars. - Load human photos only from Paperclip asset URLs. Show initials for external profile URLs without an image request. - Add tests with the real task row for agent and human images, image fallbacks, unassigned tasks, and the Columns control. - Use the shared human label when a directory entry is missing. The local operator shows Board. Other missing users show the short user ID. - Update Storybook data, design guidance, and the task-list verification steps. ## Verification - Current head: `c49fee5c9b`. The source-tested merge is `586873fe47921b250ab0de18371d25632f46cff0`, which integrates master `53645a0104`. The last commit removes only the inherited avatar paragraph from the feature map under the current map-scope rule. Map checks pass again. No history rewrite or duplicate feature PR. - Reproduced the old voice-report CI failure before integration. The unchanged test on `7f1d137a` passed on an unloaded local machine. With a controlled 3,250 ms delay in its first local provider fixture and a 15-second wait, the old polling failed: expected 105 report requests, received 315. This confirms the fake clock crossed refresh deadlines during database work. - Master already fixes this exact failure through #18628 (`d26628e35a`). The fixed polling passes with the identical delay and wait budget. The exact session IDs, 105 requests, one attempt per report, bounded reconstruction, restart, and quiet assertions remain. The temporary delay is removed. - Final committed code: all 15 voice-report tests and 46 scheduler/coordinator tests pass against disposable embedded PostgreSQL on macOS arm64. No external provider call is used. - All 154 tests pass across eight focused UI suites: TaskList, TaskList.assignees, CoordinatorTasks, IssueRow, AgentAvatar, useTaskListCollection, useTaskListColumnPreferences, and TaskChatBubble. - Three merge conflicts retained both current behavior and the avatar feature: current sorting and column preferences, unread state, assignee photos, and shared human labels. The focused tests cover those contracts. - UI TypeScript, UI build, token gates, map structure, Storybook catalog generation, and whitespace checks pass. Storybook output is generated and ignored. - The original server shard failure remains recorded: [voice-report CI failure](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41472540522/job/125369899753), expected zero idle holds but received two. Older attempts also had attention-retention and sandbox-runtime timeouts; their causes were not established in those attempts. Fresh CI must qualify the merged head. - Previous review findings were fixed with red/green coverage: missing avatar tests, shared human labels, and arbitrary human image URLs. Current code still limits human photos to Paperclip asset URLs; external URLs use initials and start no image preload. - Prior browser checks covered agent and human images, fallbacks, unassigned rows, hidden columns, and long-name keyboard focus. Those checks used production components with fixture data and do not prove live backend behavior. No new browser or hosted task action was performed for this CI repair. - Current head `c49fee5c9b`: Greptile and Paperclip review both give 5/5 with no findings. The initial CI attempt passed the original server shard and all other completed test suites. The workspaces-a 2/2 job was interrupted by a runner shutdown signal ([job log](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42250845315/job/128006963628)); it has no complete test result. A single bounded retry of that shard and its dependent verification has been requested after the initial workflow ended. No source change is based on that interruption. - Final-head qualification: `c49fee5c9b75b695d2894933bbcbe0896aab9148` passes all 55 applicable CI checks (three skipped, one neutral review). [CI result](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42250845315). Greptile gives 5/5 with no open findings. Hosted task recovery remains pending verified rollout. ## Risks - Low risk. The change adds identity pictures through existing UI components and existing company data. - Human profile images hosted outside Paperclip show initials in this table. This matches the existing task-message avatar rule. - A long name has less width beside its avatar. The existing hover and focus reveal keeps the name readable. - Current master changes table sorting and preferences. Merge resolution retains these contracts and their tests. Fresh CI and review must pass before merge. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex assisted with code and verification. The runtime did not expose an exact model ID or context-window size. The agent used code execution and repository tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups — current head `c49fee5c9b`; the map-scope finding is fixed and its thread is resolved - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-06 11:01:02 -06:00
3 people	7b9334cd10	Draft: Build agent-ready design proposal system (#16875) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - People need consistent UI patterns to review and control that work. > - The current board uses related layouts and controls with different spacing, type, and behavior. > - That drift makes it hard for a designer or an agent to build a new page from a reliable reference. > - Storybook can show the shared patterns and the states they need to support. > - This pull request adds design proposals, a local sandbox, and reusable UI controls so people can compare the patterns in context. > - The benefit is a clearer design system that agents can use to build consistent UI. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** `ui/` — React board UI and Storybook. **Problem or motivation** Board pages repeat visual and interaction decisions. Storybook did not provide a complete reference for task views, conversation states, typography, toolbars, tabs, and light/dark colors. People could not compare a proposed pattern with the running board in one place. **Proposed solution** Add a staged Design Proposals catalog with foundations, components, layouts, and page specimens. Add an opt-in sandbox. Reuse production components where possible. Include synthetic conversation states and shared controls so reviewers can compare and refine them. **Alternatives considered** Separate static mockups would not show keyboard behavior, responsive layout, or real component states. Rebuilding each page only in Storybook would allow the reference to drift from the board. **Roadmap alignment** This improves existing board UI and Skills Manager surfaces. It does not add a new control-plane capability. ## What Changed - Added dark and light color references, typography and conversation specimens, and component stories for buttons, tabs, toolbars, sidebar, popovers, activity, and task lists. - Added a local design sandbox with synthetic task conversation playback and representative states. - Shared collection toolbars and navigation patterns across task, agent, project, routine, skill, connector, and artifact pages. - Added the streamlined Skills tabs and a My Skills collection that uses the shared skill cards. - Restored saved-thread access during synthetic playback, kept connector searchbox semantics, and updated reproduction checks after moving trial stories. - Documented the proposed patterns and added focused UI, catalog, and browser checks. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates`, `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, and `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs --check` passed. - Full workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed after merging master. After the review fixes, focused UI typecheck, `pnpm build-storybook`, 23 Skills Sources tests, and all 15 Storybook typography browser tests passed. - Focused task-thread and system-notice suites passed: 251 tests. Connector Browse passed 84 tests; the connector, attachment, recovery, and Storybook flyout browser journeys passed locally. - A local full Vitest run hit one intermittent chat-channels integration failure; that test passed in isolation. GitHub CI [39347996059](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39347996059) passed on the exact latest commit: 55 successful checks and two skipped draft-only Storybook jobs. - Greptile reviewed the exact latest commit at 5/5 with no new comments or open review threads. GitHub reports the branch as cleanly mergeable. ## Risks - This PR changes 206 files and exceeds the repository's 100-file review target. Review by commit and consider a scoped split before merge. - Design Proposals are staged references. Fixture interactions do not prove API behavior, permissions, or provider execution. - UI changes to shared controls may affect pages outside the proposal sandbox. Focused browser checks and the full CI matrix passed. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact runtime model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. The model used reasoning, code execution, browser inspection, and local tests. Earlier branch commits were also AI-assisted in this Codex conversation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details available in this session) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above where applicable - [x] I have either linked existing issues or described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id - [x] I have run focused tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Scott Tong <scott@scotts-mbp-m5-max.local> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-19 17:45:26 -07:00