Commit Graph
10 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DottaandPaperclip dbbde744d2 fix(workspaces): preserve finalized recovery holds through offline import (#19180)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Offline workspace import must save files before local volume
removal.
> - A task recovery hold can remain after native file finalization
succeeds.
> - The old importer rejects that hold even when its file source is
exact and no controller owns the run.
> - Clearing the hold would discard the task's recovery obligation.
> - This pull request saves files and carries each exact recovery source
forward without resolving the hold.
> - Accepted-result finalizers keep their existing retry path.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19144, #18943, #19038. This PR builds on merged #19144.

**What happened?**

Offline import reports `workspace_recovery_unresolved` for terminal
native runs with finalized workspace references and active task recovery
holds. Some holds also name an exact historical file allocation.

**Expected behavior**

Save the workspace durably. Keep task warnings, recovery rows, results,
coordinator phases and task pointers unchanged. Retain exact future file
recovery and accepted-result finalization retries.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Retain a local task workspace and an active recovery hold for a
finalized native run.
2. Stop all application writers through offline maintenance.
3. Attempt workspace import.
4. Observe that the old importer rejects the hold.

## What Changed

- Add an owner module that checks the exact terminal native run,
finalized reference, released ownership and task relationship.
- Require the normal finalizer's successful company/run/task receipt for
an accepted-result retry. Support historical receipts without a
workspace foreign key.
- Validate recorded file allocations with the existing recovery-source
owner.
- Journal and recheck hold evidence. Lock recovery, coordinator, run and
allocation rows before publication.
- Give finalized file sources a separate migration marker. Keep legacy
execution-replay suppression out of accepted-result retry paths.
- Use the owning parser for older finalized references that omit
optional fields.
- Redirect future file recovery to immutable snapshot preservation. Keep
provider-stop and source checks intact.
- Verify native copyback or snapshot receipts for each exact allocation.
Require proof for every source, including completed mixed repairs.
- Retain existing successful copyback receipts. Keep a historical
folder's obligation on its real source workspace.
- Retain the finalized migration marker through the execution blocker
projection. Discover finalized child-task sources from their exact
ancestor workspace reference.
- Document the receipt and lock contracts.

## Verification

- Fresh local run at head 6ebe535751: 208
tests pass across the new preservation suite, migration suite,
publication concurrency suite and legacy restore recovery suite.
- `node ../node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --config vitest.config.ts
src/services/finalized-workspace-recovery-migration.test.ts
src/services/remote-workspace-migration-concurrency.test.ts
src/services/remote-workspace-migration.test.ts
src/__tests__/legacy-workspace-restore-recovery.test.ts` from `server/`.
- Comment-only cleanup `a858d203c68a6c86fd39e30fb63dc56c1a303429`
removes added prose comments under CONTRIBUTING.md. TypeScript 6.0.3
output with `removeComments: true` is byte-identical before and after
for all six changed TypeScript files. Runtime behavior and the 208-test
evidence are unchanged; no new tests were added for this cleanup.
- The two file-restoration cases fail against the original importer with
`workspace_recovery_unresolved`.
- Positive tests delete the old folder and restore the saved archive.
They compare unchanged task, recovery, result and coordinator rows.
- Negative controls cover unknown kinds, mismatched sources, malformed
file markers, active ownership, active recovery and changed evidence
during upload.
- Red/green tests exercise getExecutionBlocker and the ancestor import
path. An accepted result without a successful finalize receipt remains
blocked.
- The mixed-receipt regression fails before the review fix and passes
afterward. A missing secondary receipt still blocks repair.
- Existing and future repair receipts remain readable. Accepted-result
finalization still returns its original successful receipt.
- Local server typechecking passed before the master replay. The
post-replay local check found a stale linked Runner declaration in
unchanged vendor code. Clean current-head CI Typecheck + Release
Registry and Build both pass.
- Greptile gives current head `a858d203c68a6c86fd39e30fb63dc56c1a303429`
5/5. All actionable findings are fixed and resolved.
- The prior CI run had one workspace shard cancelled after its spot
runner received a shutdown signal. No test assertion failed in that job.
That incomplete run was superseded by the equivalent comment-only
cleanup. The fresh full CI run passed on the current head; the original
infrastructure cancellation remains recorded here.
- [Current-head full
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41970385102)
passes: 54 success, one neutral and two skipped statuses, with no failed
or pending checks. Typecheck, tests and build pass.
- Ponytail's source review rates the behavior head 5/5. It did not
execute tests; the local and CI runs above supply execution evidence.
- No provider, serving migration or copied-data deployment acceptance is
claimed.

## Risks

- This path depends on the existing offline deployment fence. It does
not prove that providers stopped.
- Unknown or unverified source boundaries remain blocked.
- Migration receipts must remain exact. Missing or changed finalized
file-source receipts fail closed.
- Root maintainers own merge, deployment and copied-data acceptance
#19144 is already merged.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6.1 Codex, exact model ID `gpt-6.1-sol`. Used for reasoning,
code editing, shell tools and test execution. The runtime does not
expose its context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-04 23:15:11 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip f5f5184f23 fix(workspaces): preserve retained branches and private commit sources (#19147)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Ephemeral web servers must preserve existing task files before
volume removal.
> - An old private checkout can be absent while its recorded branch
still exists.
> - A deleted branch can also retain its exact commit in the original
private object source.
> - The importer currently rejects these surviving sources.
> - This pull request saves the verified committed tree and records its
exact source proof.
> - It keeps task state, branch ownership and recovery obligations
unchanged.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19138, #19144, #18826.

**What happened?**

Existing Git workspace records can have missing checkout folders and
retained branch objects. The importer returns
`local_source_unsafe_or_missing`. A successful deletion receipt can also
have a valid private object source that the importer overlooks in favor
of a missing or changed project cache.

**Expected behavior**

Save the surviving committed tree from the exact recorded branch or
deletion receipt. Reject competing owners, live worktree registrations,
changed branches and invalid source identities. Do not use the current
default branch as a substitute.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Retain an isolated workspace branch in its managed project cache.
2. Remove its clean checkout but keep the branch and original workspace
record.
3. Attempt workspace migration.
4. Alternatively, retain a deleted commit in its recorded private source
while its shared source is unavailable.

## What Changed

- Pin a retained branch in its verified company and project Git cache.
- Require the recorded private path, no competing workspace owner and no
surviving Git worktree registration or index authority.
- For a user-owned branch, require its exact successful unforced removal
receipt after archival. Preserve the branch ownership metadata.
- Prefer a verified recorded private object source for successful
deletion receipts when that source still exists.
- Recheck branch and receipt proof before publication. Preserve
compatibility with existing migration journals.
- Allow missing active records only through the existing offline writer
fence. Keep their status unchanged.
- Add byte-restoration and rejected-authority tests. Document the source
limits.

- Revalidate and honor interrupted journals' original Git source path.
Reject detached registrations and retained orphan index data. Reuse the
cleanup producer command formatter for paths containing spaces.

## Verification

- 172 focused migration, concurrency and isolated-source tests pass with
real PostgreSQL and Git repositories.
- The previous importer fails the retained-branch and offline-active
restoration cases. The previous source selection also fails the
private-cache and clean user-owned receipt cases.
- Tests remove the old home and restore the pinned commit and task file
bytes. New shared default-branch work is excluded.
- Tests reject competing owners, registered worktrees, missing branch
ownership, deleted branches, changed branch tips, forced removal and
revoked receipts.
- Read-only re-inventory of 79 actual failed source records makes 78
eligible with committed owner overlays. One older local test repository
remains blocked. This is source-overlay qualification, not full
released-image acceptance.
- A separate bounded archive replay completed six imports before its
25-minute deadline. That timing failure remains open; it does not
establish complete migration.
- Local server typecheck has no changed-file diagnostics. Stale linked
declarations prevent a clean local whole-server result. Full clean CI
remains required.
- Serving enrollment and empty-home recovery remain separate acceptance
gates.

- Latest rebased head 9f42901683 passes 172 focused
migration/archive/concurrency tests. Four review regressions fail on the
previous source; the revoked journal source already rejected correctly.
The real cleanup fixture uses an unforced removal under a home path
containing spaces. The orphan-index fixture is locked to keep Git
maintenance from deleting its synthetic retained state before
inspection.
- The prerebase layered server typecheck passed. Current-head full CI
remains required after integrating master. The local environment reset
removed earlier temporary logs; the current red/green logs and source
now live in persistent worktree folders.

- Current-head full CI passes on run 41965901512 after one bounded
failed-shard retry. The first run failed an unrelated status-card
fake-clock deadline assertion by 150 ms; the same source passed the
retry. Its cause remains unestablished, and the first failure log
remains in Actions and persistent local evidence. No migration-related
test failed.

## Risks

- A retained branch saves committed data that still exists. It cannot
certify recovery of files that were already absent.
- User-owned branches remain user-owned. A clean removal receipt grants
preservation authority, not deletion authority.
- Any retained registration, conflicting record or changed proof keeps
migration blocked.
- This PR does not resolve the remaining source, recovery or migration
timing gates.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6.1 Codex, exact model ID `gpt-6.1-sol`. Used for reasoning,
code editing, shell tools and test execution. The runtime does not
expose its context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-04 22:35:55 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip c8013d06ad fix(workspaces): preserve task-only warnings during offline migration (#19144)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Ephemeral web servers must save existing workspaces before volume
removal.
> - Offline migration checks file ownership and recovery authority.
> - The same gate also rejects task assignment and configuration
warnings.
> - Those warnings do not require the old filesystem.
> - This pull request preserves known task-only warnings while it saves
files.
> - File recovery and execution obligations keep their existing
blockers.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18943, #19038, #19138.

**What happened?**

Offline workspace migration refuses tasks with assignment,
configuration, disposition or deliberate-wait warnings. It returns
`workspace_recovery_unresolved` even when the warning has no file or
execution recovery authority.

**Expected behavior**

Save local workspace bytes while retaining the task warning unchanged.
Continue to block unknown recovery kinds, file sources, export failures
and execution recovery work.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Retain a local workspace on a task with an active assignment or
configuration warning.
2. Stop all app writers through the offline maintenance entry.
3. Attempt workspace migration.

## What Changed

- Admit four known task-only warning kinds during offline file
migration.
- Keep file recovery markers, system recovery, native failure markers,
export-failure causes and unknown kinds blocked unless their exact
legacy source is already preserved.
- Keep the existing live-migration recovery exclusion.
- Recheck warning evidence before publication. Do not resolve warnings
or change their owners.
- Add restoration, rejection and publication-race tests. Update the
migration plan.

## Verification

- 112 focused migration and concurrency tests pass with real PostgreSQL
and filesystem archives.
- The four task-only restoration cases fail against the previous
importer with `workspace_recovery_unresolved`.
- Tests delete the old home, restore its saved bytes and compare each
warning row unchanged.
- File and execution markers, unknown kinds and export failures remain
blocked.
- A task warning that gains file recovery during upload prevents
publication.
- Local server typecheck has no changed-file diagnostics. Stale linked
dependency declarations prevent a clean local whole-server result. Clean
full CI remains required before merge.
- The PR was rebased onto the merged Git preservation fix after
resolving a plan-document conflict. The rebased head passed full PR CI
(41943153422). Current head ba18efc7b5 adds the reviewed deliberate-wait
case and reuses the canonical export-cause set; fresh full CI is
required. The earlier unmergeable head did not have a PR workflow run.
- Serving enrollment and full copied-data acceptance remain separate
gates.

## Risks

- The allowlist must remain narrow. New warning kinds are blocked by
default.
- A known task-only warning with file or execution recovery evidence
still blocks migration.
- This change depends on the existing offline provider fence. It does
not establish that old app writers stopped.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6.1 Codex, exact model ID `gpt-6.1-sol`. Used for reasoning,
code editing, shell tools and test execution. The runtime does not
expose its context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-04 22:00:41 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip de9f263454 fix(workspaces): prevent preservation lock cycles (#18918)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Remote workspaces save files before a later task turn can use them.
> - Admission, preparation and preservation share task, run and
workspace rows.
> - Snapshot inserts also lock their foreign-key parents.
> - Different acquisition orders could form a PostgreSQL deadlock and
delay saved-file recovery.
> - This pull request orders those runtime parents and refuses busy
legacy publication owners.
> - Files and ownership evidence remain available without replaying
provider work.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

Snapshot reservation and publication could hold a workspace while
waiting for a task or run. Other workspace owners could hold that parent
while waiting for the workspace. Review also found reverse preparation,
provisioning and legacy-import paths. Real PostgreSQL owner-pair tests
reproduce `40P01`.

**Expected behavior**

Concurrent owners must complete or retain their normal ownership
refusal. A lock cycle must not interrupt file preservation.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Prepare a remote workspace with retained files in disposable
PostgreSQL.
2. Schedule actual save and reserve, preserve, prepare or provision
functions on opposing rows.
3. Release the scheduling barrier.
4. Unfixed source deadlocks. Fixed source saves the files or returns its
normal ownership hold.

The tests also schedule an actual legacy import beside an arriving
reservation and a stale native status commit.

**Paperclip version or commit**

The original three save regressions fail on unchanged master
`ce7766dc11c4515190d48d395f26a90bba900f8a`. Reverse preparation,
provisioning and imported no-op controls fail on published `2d13b3f`.
The additional import-publication and native-status owner pairs also
have causal PostgreSQL RED/GREEN proof.

**Deployment mode**

Source checkout with PostgreSQL and real filesystem commands. Snapshot
encryption and reload use local object storage. No hosted storage, live
model or original-task recovery claim.

Related: Refs #18908, whose preservation acceptance exposed this
separate fault. This repair has no code dependency on that PR. Refs
#17846 for separate legacy terminalization locks. Refs #18746 for the
documented admission order. Repository search found no existing repair
for this owner graph.

## What Changed

- Lock company, current task and run before the runtime workspace.
Recheck the run binding and pin save-operation attribution.
- Apply that order to reserve, prepare, provision and both save
transactions. New shared-workspace provisioning receipts use the current
task.
- Lock import source parents before reservation and publication. Recheck
the source binding and retain the publication fingerprint.
- Use full-strength `NOWAIT` locks for legacy coordinator, run and
allocation rows. Only PostgreSQL `55P03` becomes
`remote_workspace_migration_blocked:execution_rows_busy`. The
publication transaction rolls back. Other errors propagate.
- Preserve writer, epoch, snapshot, foreign-key, Stop and owner checks.
Keep command, capture and upload I/O outside row-lock transactions.
- Add actual-owner concurrency, unknown-effect, eventual retry and
rollback controls. Document each owning transaction and its foreign-key
edges.

## Verification

- Node 24.22.2 and pnpm 9.15.4: all 107 save-concurrency,
migration-concurrency and migration tests pass.
- All 81 enabled disposable-PostgreSQL integration and lifecycle
controls pass on the final head. Both opt-in database variables point to
a dedicated local test database; no skipped case is counted as
qualification.
- Actual preparation/provision/import no-op peers reproduce three
deadlocks on the prior source. The fixed owners preserve and reload
files. The real provisioning command runs once; a lost response remains
an unknown effect and is never replayed.
- Actual legacy publication versus reserve and stale native status
commit also reproduce deadlocks before repair. Busy run/lease controls
preserve the journal, archive and files, then finish from the same
journal after release.
- A real publication constraint failure rolls back earlier coordinator,
profile and snapshot writes. Its original database error propagates.
- Immutable same-company and foreign-task guards, writer/epoch loss and
uploaded-object retention pass. Four real shared/inherited reuse cases
fail old receipt attribution and pass current-task attribution.
- The original spontaneous issue-foreign-key failure did not retain its
peer statement. These controlled owner pairs prove supported defects;
they do not identify that historical peer.
- Commands: `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/services/remote-workspace-save-concurrency.test.ts
server/src/services/remote-workspace-migration-concurrency.test.ts
server/src/services/remote-workspace-migration.test.ts`. Enable the
separate lifecycle suites only with their documented disposable test
database variables.
- Full recursive typecheck and `pnpm build` pass on production commit
`dacf6278abd3257c407a297c6db8872e76d85f61`, using Node 24.22.2 and pnpm
9.15.4. Current head `4c1d7769e6cfa9536a67c4e3b536cef155f19966` changes
only the canonical PostgreSQL host-support guards. All 18 changed
concurrency cases executed and passed with zero skips; their server
test-layer typecheck passes. All 57 current-head check contexts are
terminal and clean: 53 passed, two skipped and two neutral. Required `ci
/ verify` and `ci / e2e` pass. Greptile and Paperclip both reviewed
exact current head at 5/5 with no actionable findings. There are no open
review threads.
- Composition with #18908 includes this exact parent history. Its
production-composed head passed 724 affected tests, all 81 enabled
integration/lifecycle controls, recursive typecheck and build on Node
24. Its final test-only guard head passed the 18 changed concurrency
cases and their test-layer typecheck. This is local
server/PostgreSQL/native-backend-boundary evidence, not a hosted model
or storage claim.
- The required broad local Vitest attempt stopped at an unchanged chat
publication-batch test with `socket hang up`. The earlier CI workspace
shard timed out in the unchanged CLI chunked-ZIP test. Both failures
remain recorded; neither is reported as a pass or hidden by timeout
changes. The chat case passes one bounded focused head/base control, so
the original full-suite socket failure was not reproduced by that
control.

## Risks

- Short transactions take parent-row locks earlier. Competing writers
can wait for those transactions.
- Administrative import now refuses a busy native owner. It retains its
journal and archive for a later explicit retry.
- Native owners have different lock orders. The import's nonblocking
requests avoid a new global native lock policy.
- Missing bindings and uncertain command effects remain holds. The
repair does not infer termination, release an executor or replay
external work.
- No schema, foreign-key or timeout change.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact serving model build and context
window are not exposed in this agent session. The agent used reasoning,
terminal tools, code edits, PostgreSQL and filesystem tests. A separate
Codex agent reviewed the production ownership graph.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-04 07:17:40 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 84aa989bf9 Preserve native sessions through legacy workspace enrollment (#18943)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - A native session retains its workspace and provider session across
turns.
> - An ephemeral web server must restore those files without its
predecessor's disk.
> - Legacy enrollment changes the workspace authority and can change
both workspace addresses.
> - The retained provider backup checks those addresses as part of its
identity.
> - This pull request preserves the exact addresses in a verified
migration receipt.
> - The benefit is that the next turn can use the original session after
enrollment.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18932, merged as `612d9931a6`. This pull request builds on that
all-Runner durability change. Related: #18918 fixes concurrent workspace
preservation locks. This change covers identity preservation during
offline enrollment.

## What Changed

- The native workspace migration owner records the selected session
bindings in the successful workspace migration operation.
- Runtime selection retains the original logical address only for the
exact agent, task and session.
- Remote workspace preparation restores the original provider address.
It refuses conflicting targets, forged receipts and occupied unowned
roots.
- The environment owner includes the migration operation in the reusable
lease fingerprint. Warm policy stays warm and receives a fresh
allocation through normal lease cleanup.
- Exact migration evidence permits the existing verified provider backup
to restore into that fresh warm allocation.
- Preserve verified provider allocation files through a normalized,
lease-bound digest receipt. Unknown files and altered markers remain
refused; interrupted publication is retryable.
- Retain legacy managed-instruction session fingerprints using the exact
imported content hash and recorded paths, preserving all other
configuration and credential checks.
- Migrate existing local skill archive/manifest objects through upload
claims, readback verification and receipt compare-and-swap; retain
original objects and IDs.
- Add explicit two-turn browser qualification for every released native
Daytona profile, with warm and per-turn variants. The production
maintenance entry runs offline. The old home is deleted only after a
verified export and successor readiness. The oracle checks provider
identity, native session, addresses, reference bytes, question and final
document.

## Verification

- Full repository typecheck passed at `b12ecd823e`. The production
session fix passed 198 session/credential tests. Full repository build
passed at `94bb917947`. The final Rust-only provider fix passed 57 ACPX
provider tests and the exact Linux release build.
- Workspace and transport checks passed: 117 transport/workspace tests,
six final real PostgreSQL migration boundary cases, 178 environment
tests, 539 Daytona tests (eight skips), and the native warm-backup
admission control.
- Local skill migration passed eight PostgreSQL/S3 tests (one existing
opt-in skip). Failed readback retains the source. Successful readback
still works after deletion of the old home.
- Latest Product E2E typecheck and 38 focused harness tests pass.
Earlier catalog/admission/report checks passed. Twelve unrelated
support-test failures reproduce on unchanged base `1a39dea9aa`; these
are not reported as passing.
- Live Codex per-turn at `2d5bb9a6d1` retained the native and provider
sessions, both workspace paths and exact reference bytes after deletion
of the old home. It completed the task and delivered its saved document
and original reference. Its original failure was an output-count grading
defect. The corrected grader passes all 21 checks against retained,
hashed evidence; the original result remains unchanged.
- Live OpenCode per-turn and Codex warm at harness `94bb917947` pass all
21 product checks. Their launcher cleanup failed because a read-only
diagnostic observer kept its disposable database open. The observer now
closes before ordinary database cleanup; a no-provider reproduction
confirms the fix. All owned sandboxes were independently verified
absent, child keys revoked and buckets removed. Original failed campaign
dispositions remain unchanged.
- Claude at `94bb917947` kept its sessions and reference bytes but
omitted the final clickable document link. That user-delivery failure
remains recorded. The fixture now explicitly asks for the link and
records migration evidence before checking navigation. The fresh Claude
attempt at `b12ecd823e` passed both strict migration checks: exact
provider/native session, both paths, original file bytes and
independently downloaded attachment. Its full browser workflow failed
again: it requested unnecessary confirmation, used the answer sentence
as the reference, and omitted the clickable document link. This is
retained as a failed user-workflow result, not a full pass.
- Earlier live failures exposed and reproduced the skill-object,
fresh-allocation marker and managed-instruction fingerprint bugs. The
fixes retain original identity checks. No provider session reset or
accounting bypass was used.
- The real Grok continuation at `b12ecd823e` failed before provider
execution because its immutable-instruction attach policy rejected
relocated registered file copies. A no-provider regression reproduced
the exact rejection. `b05ba3728a` selects the existing strict
authenticated asset-path policy for Grok; content digests, unknown
context fields, session/workspace identity and same-run mutations remain
enforced. The regression and all 57 ACPX provider controls pass. The
Grok browser migration now passes all 21 checks with the b05 Linux
Runner, including provider identity, exact reference bytes and final
user output; the launcher also reports successful cleanup.
- `24fabf1d81` applies the same policy to released ACPX Codex after a
second no-provider reproduction. All 58 ACPX provider controls and the
final Linux release build pass. Its live browser migration passes all 21
checks on the final binary, including exact original session/file
preservation and completed user output.
- The full native-session executor suite passes all 1,121 tests after
updating its existing lease database fixture for the migration-receipt
join. The prior CI failure was this unsupported test-double method; the
production guard still rejects ordinary unproven recovery. CI and
Greptile 5/5 passed at `ca1e0d5fe6`. The first CI attempt lost several
workers and had one rotated-recovery transport failure; its seven
descriptor cases passed locally, and the single unchanged retry passed.
The original failure remains recorded. Staging enrollment has not
started. Initial offline enrollment and subsequent rolling availability
are separate checks.

- The final review follow-up adds real runtime-selection PostgreSQL
cases for exact, different-session and absent receipts, plus
executor-level warm restoration that copies actual backup files and
verifies provider identity and the new lease stamp. Both complete
affected suites pass (1,172 tests), and full repository typecheck
passes. Removing either production migration connection independently
makes its new positive case fail; both source files were restored
byte-for-byte after these negative controls.

- Final commit `0971d373a3` passes all 63 checks (57 successes, five
expected skips, one neutral); Greptile is 5/5 and every review thread is
resolved.

## Risks

- An identity conflict blocks enrollment and keeps the original files.
It does not silently reset the session.
- A new migration generation retires a reusable lease through its
existing owner. The original sandbox must finish normal cleanup before
reuse proceeds.
- Initial enrollment has an offline step. The separate rolling suites
prove uninterrupted deploy behavior after enrollment.
- This adds no schema migration and changes no provider credentials or
accounting gate.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact serving model build and context
window are not exposed in this session. The agent used reasoning,
terminal tools, code edits, PostgreSQL/filesystem tests and isolated
live browser qualification.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-04 04:43:56 -06:00
Dotta 82dd3bb702 Preserve unstarted queued turns during offline enrollment (#18887)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Existing-volume enrollment moves server files to durable object
storage.
> - Enrollment stops application deployments before it changes file
authority.
> - A task drain keeps unstarted turns queued in the database.
> - The migration rejected every queued row, so a busy instance could
never finish enrollment without discarding requests.
> - This change preserves unstarted queue intent and continues to reject
running or previously started executions.
> - Users keep their pending turns and saved files through the
conversion.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A preserving enrollment found queued turns after task admission stopped.
The workspace, instruction-file, and historical-log guards treated these
rows as live writers. The drain also prevented the rows from starting,
so waiting could not satisfy the migration guard.

**Expected behavior**

After every old deployment has stopped, maintenance can move files while
unstarted queued turns remain unchanged. The replacement claims those
turns through normal admission. Actual executions and retained execution
ownership continue to block migration.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Queue a turn behind another task.
2. Start a task drain and let the current task finish.
3. Stop the application deployments and run offline enrollment.
4. Observe `active_execution_requires_drain` for the unstarted queued
turn.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced on the migration contract through #18864. This branch starts
at `ab2d2098a2764c511978d1c3e7a3fc5dfcef07f4`.

Related: #18826, #18835, #18841, #18864. Searches for queued enrollment
and queued migration found no duplicate fix.

## What Changed

- Share one offline execution predicate across workspace, agent-file,
and historical-log migration.
- Reuse the existing pre-dispatch evidence predicate; queued turns with
execution markers, saved checkpoints, source events, coordinators, or
environment leases remain blockers.
- Keep task bindings and normal live-migration restrictions unchanged.
- Exercise normal replacement admission after deleting the old
filesystem: the same queued run reads restored workspace bytes and
instructions, completes its original wake, and cannot execute twice.
- Document the offline boundary and queued-turn behavior.

## Verification

- **111 tests passed** across the final 110-case migration suite and
assembled queued-turn heartbeat proof, with real PostgreSQL and local
S3. This includes workspace/log migration, queued ownership blockers,
ordinary agent-file controls, and the actual bundled maintenance
process.
- The maintenance process preserves the queued row while archiving
historical output. The new assembled heartbeat test creates a normal
wake under drain, migrates without changing either row, deletes the
original filesystem, and resumes through normal admission. It reads
saved workspace bytes and the restored instruction bundle, persists one
successful native result, completes the same wake, and verifies a second
sweep does not duplicate execution. Only sandbox transport/provider
execution are scripted; no live model or Daytona calls.
- An earlier optional run-evidence worker integration invocation was
skipped without its dedicated environment; it is outside the changed
offline path.
- Server typecheck, server build, and runtime bundle passed.
- The first maintenance test exposed the separate agent-file guard; that
guard now uses the same offline predicate and the test passes.
- Initial local typecheck attempts lacked CLI dependency links in this
isolated checkout. Restoring dependencies fixed setup without source
changes.
- Full repository checks run in CI. The first head lost spot runners in
Build and serialized tests; one unchanged idle-deadline fixture crossed
UTC midnight and failed its timestamp assertion. Final-head CI passed on
run 41744678994 after retrying a spot-runner shutdown. Greptile reviewed
the exact final head at 5/5; all inline findings are resolved. The
separate Paperclip Review app remains queued. Hosted enrollment remains
pending release qualification and compatibility verification for the
existing provider configuration.

## Risks

The offline predicate relies on Cloud stopping every old application
deployment. It does not make online migration safe. Running executions
always block. Requeued executions with retained ownership also block. No
queued request, task binding, or recovery state is removed or rewritten.
No database schema changes.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 based, with reasoning and tool-assisted code
execution. The exact deployed model identifier and context-window size
are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-11-03 18:33:41 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 0ab3ce7a03 fix(workspaces): preserve legacy recovery across storage migration (#18841)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages durable tasks and agent work through the control
plane.
> - An ephemeral web server needs existing workspace files in shared
storage.
> - Failed historical runs can still own recoverable sandbox files or
unfinished coordinator state.
> - Moving local files must preserve those obligations without replaying
the old agent turn.
> - Migration journals the exact source and fences old copyback; the
recovery owner saves verified sandbox files separately.
> - New user input can continue only after matching preservation
receipts and independent execution-stop checks.
> - Accepted results retain their finalization owner and must have its
durable workspace receipt before storage moves.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Builds on merged #18826 and #18835.

**What happened?**

Existing workspaces with failed native copyback could not migrate to
remote storage. Simply changing their storage authority would let later
recovery target a retired local directory, lose child-task attachments,
or leave a recovered task unable to accept a new turn.

**Expected behavior**

Preserve local files, exact sandbox provenance, task bindings,
checkpoints, and unresolved history. Recover surviving sandbox files
into immutable task-scoped attachments after migration, and let a new
authorized user turn use those files without replaying the old
execution.

**Steps to reproduce**

Create a terminal native run with a prepared copyback descriptor and a
retained sandbox. Migrate its local workspace, remove the old host
filesystem, recover the sandbox, and submit a new user turn. Also
exercise a child task reusing its ancestor's workspace and an expired
observed coordinator.

## What Changed

- Journal exact legacy run, task, descriptor, and unfinished coordinator
bindings during offline migration. Descriptor-free runs retain the
complete declared lease/allocation/directory identities; publication
locks and revalidates them.
- Publish a run-scoped fence that prevents automatic restart or copyback
into the retired local authority.
- Release only the exact journaled expired coordinator lease under the
offline deployment fence and locked revalidation, recording the prior
owner in recovery history. Preserve phase, checkpoint, result, and run
status.
- Save recovered sandbox files through the existing immutable snapshot
owner, retaining allocation and provider-stop checks.
- Attach recovered files using the current task's identity when a child
reuses an ancestor workspace.
- Accept matching migration and snapshot receipts for workspace-repair
admission and explicit new-user continuation. Changed coordinator
bindings and invalid receipts remain blocked.
- Require the finalizer's successful workspace_finalize operation before
moving a workspace whose accepted result has finalized copyback; the
existing owner can then finish assessment/status effects.
- Document unresolved workspace-policy, task-ownership, and
missing-provenance cases as separate owner actions that block
detachment.

## Verification

- 569 tests across migration, retained recovery, and explicit
continuation passed on ffcde13f57.
- The final saved-result follow-up passes all 75 migration tests. Four
receipt cases cover prepared copyback, a successful finalization
receipt, a missing receipt, and a failed receipt. The successful case
invokes the actual finalizer after migration and completes the existing
saved operation.
- Five real-file journeys cover a retained host, removed host,
child-task reuse, an expired observed coordinator, and a descriptor-free
run with two separate sandbox allocations. They recover sandbox files,
clear the repair blocker, admit an explicit /new user comment, reserve a
new remote workspace, and verify recovered attachment contents.
- Negative cases reject changed coordinator phase/owner, invalid
migration fences, changed source sets and allocations, mismatched
task/allocation/action receipts, malformed archives, and unfinished
snapshot operations. Descriptor-free continuation requires every
journaled source; one missing archive keeps the hold.
- Twelve PostgreSQL/S3 and maintenance-service tests pass on the exact
final rebuilt runtime, including a plain-Node bundled process,
authenticated original-key export, overlapping task-folder restore, and
complete predecessor filesystem removal. The final server and runtime
bundle builds also pass.
- Head 9ab6a38fa4 passed all 573
migration/recovery/continuation tests, server typecheck, server build,
runtime bundle, and 12 PostgreSQL/S3/bundled-maintenance tests.
- Verification caught an expired-owner continuation rejection (160
recovery cases passed, one failed); the admission fix and subsequent
569-test run passed. Earlier fixture failures and the parent PR's
unrelated full-suite failure remain documented in their verification
history.
- Greptile and Paperclip Review both scored final head
fa58d4a5ce 5/5, with no remaining
findings.
- CI exposed 15 blocker-read projection regressions: descriptor-free
checks performed an extra full run read for ordinary unmigrated tasks.
The follow-up gates the lookup on the migration marker, includes that
marker in the bounded blocker projection, and selects only recovery
fields. All 31 blocker-projection and real-file journey cases plus
server typecheck pass. Final-head CI passed all 52 successful checks,
including repository typecheck, build, server tests, and browser suites.
- Preserved CI failure: the unchanged Runner package had one Cursor
Cloud Stop/checkpoint timing failure (4,903 cases passed). All four
focused local cases passed. Retrying only the failed job and its
verification gate passed without source changes.
- This PR does not claim tenant enrollment or a hosted rolling-deploy
result.

## Risks

Cloud must stop every predecessor deployment before enabling the offline
migration contract. Migration preserves uncertain work; it does not
certify provider termination, invent a completed result, or authorize
sandbox deletion. Missing or ambiguous sources remain held. Preserved
attachments are separate files rather than an automatic merge into newer
task edits. Parallel shared-write policy, stale task ownership, missing
task provenance, and accepted results without a successful finalization
receipt remain enrollment blockers. Original folders and the original
volume remain retained.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. This session does not expose a more specific serving model ID
or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used with available version and
capability details
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR using the bug template
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local issues or links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task
ID
- [x] I have run the focused tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added tests for the changed behavior
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented risks
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address reviewer findings before merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 16:17:13 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 2a16dcf629 fix(workspaces): preserve shared directory trees during enrollment (#18835)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - A volume-free web server needs existing task files in durable object
storage.
> - Historical workspace records can share a physical folder or contain
other task folders.
> - A task-level migration hold cannot fence every alias, and capturing
a parent recursively duplicates nested task data.
> - Offline enrollment imports children first and verifies their durable
coverage before omitting them from a parent archive.
> - Snapshot retention preserves those child versions for as long as a
covering parent depends on them.
> - Existing files, task bindings, and archived states remain intact
through the storage migration.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Builds on merged #18826.

**What happened?**

The per-workspace importer could capture a shared project folder while
another workspace record still owned the same path. It also recursively
included runtime-created nested task workspaces in each parent import.
Packaged enrollment rejected existing workspace data instead of invoking
its migration owner.

**Expected behavior**

Require offline maintenance for overlapping paths. Import nested tasks
before their parents, verify every excluded directory against its saved
snapshot, preserve dependencies through retention, and resume
interrupted imports without replacing existing remote authority.

**Steps to reproduce**

Create a project workspace and another task workspace below its
`.paperclip/worktrees/` directory. Try importing either while ordinary
writers are running, then run offline enrollment. Interrupt a parent
import after upload and resume it.

## What Changed

- Add physical-overlap admission checks and an offline entry-point
guard, including global running and queued executions.
- Import pending records in leaf-first pages through the existing
migration owner.
- Verify nested snapshots by downloading, restoring, and comparing the
original source before and after parent upload; check transitive
dependencies.
- Publish parent dependency receipts under child snapshot row locks.
Retention pins those children and revisits them when the parent is
deleted.
- Index imported-child dependency lookups with a partial GIN index; a
PostgreSQL query-plan regression covers 2,500 unrelated snapshots.
- Propagate cancellation through capture and object storage operations
and preserve existing retry journals.
- Wire workspace migration into packaged maintenance and document its
preservation contract.

## Verification

- The original overlap and duplicate-parent regressions failed before
implementation.
- 73 migration and retention tests pass against real PostgreSQL and
files, including interrupted uploads, resumed batches, equal-path
aliases, changed or missing child data, nested descendants, and active
or queued executions.
- Six S3-compatible storage integration tests pass, including migration
through the maintenance owner and restoration of both parent and child
after deleting the original filesystem.
- The standalone process case was initially skipped because the worktree
had no bundle. After rebuilding the server and runtime bundle, that test
passed against PostgreSQL and S3: authenticated ready/export receipts,
preserved decision secret, blocked application routes, and clean SIGTERM
shutdown.
- Server typecheck, server build, runtime bundle build, and
module-boundary checks passed. Full repository CI passed on
97136a20b9 after targeted retries of
infrastructure-interrupted jobs.
- Review fixes resolve physical paths through symlinked ancestors and
persist each parent journal’s original capture scope, including
pre-change journals. All three new regressions failed before their
fixes. An initial abort/retry test exposed JSON object-key ordering in
the saved scope; deep equality fixes that case, and the full migration
suite passed.
- Three new fixtures initially omitted required workspace fields; one
also omitted its task binding. The fixtures now satisfy the existing
contract; production validation was not relaxed.
- The parent PR's full local suite stopped on a chat retry-notice
timeout and a following fake-timer failure. All four relevant cases
passed separately without source changes; this is not a claim that the
full local suite passed.
- No staging enrollment or live rolling-deploy result is claimed by this
PR.

## Risks

The offline flag is an internal maintenance contract: Cloud must
actually stop every predecessor deployment before starting the process.
Deep or large trees require additional object downloads and source
comparisons and may exceed one maintenance window; import journals
support retry. Dependency lookups are company-scoped and event-driven,
with no added idle polling. Unavailable archived sources and unresolved
recovery/copyback still block migration and require separate owner work.
Unsupported local providers and cleanup_failed workspaces deliberately
remain enrollment blockers: filtering them from both the batch and
eligibility would abandon local files when the volume is detached. Two
regression tests prove that rejected records keep their files and do not
acquire remote authority. Original folders and the original volume
remain retained. The additional review request to ignore parallel-write
policy, stale task ownership, or a missing task binding in offline mode
is intentionally not applied: stopping deployments does not establish
those semantics. #18841 documents the separate owner actions and adds
three offline regressions preserving their files and blocking detach.
The batch reports the first failed workspace and supports journaled
retry; it does not promise aggregate diagnostics.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. This session does not expose a more specific serving model ID
or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used with available version and
capability details
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR using the bug template
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local issues or links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task
ID
- [x] I have run the focused tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added tests for the changed behavior
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented risks
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address reviewer findings before merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 14:50:14 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 2035118526 fix(workspaces): preserve archived data during remote migration (#18826)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Remote workspace storage lets the web server run without a
persistent volume.
> - Existing deployments also contain archived and historical task
workspaces.
> - Retention can remove their folders while preserving encrypted
restore points or Git reconstruction records.
> - The importer rejected those records and only accepted the task's
current workspace.
> - This pull request imports verified saved data without reopening or
rebinding tasks.
> - The benefit is preservation of existing work during an explicit
storage migration.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18403 and #17472.

**What happened?**

An explicit remote-workspace import rejected archived records,
historical task bindings, and removed folders with valid retained data.

**Expected behavior**

Import the recorded files or exact Git commit. Preserve archived state
and the task's current binding. Refuse missing, expired, corrupt, or
changed sources.

**Steps to reproduce**

Archive a task directory with a restore point, remove its folder, and
run the remote-workspace import. Repeat with a Git restore point
containing an unpushed commit and staged and unstaged edits. The
previous importer reports an inactive workspace or missing source.

## What Changed

- Preserve lifecycle state and current task binding while importing
archived and historical records. Recheck the binding before publication
and on resume.
- Expose the task-directory owner's validated restore-point reader.
Reuse it for ordinary restoration and migration.
- Restore archived directories and Git data into private scratch space.
Support saved Git recipes and exact legacy branch-deletion receipts.
- Recover pruned unpushed Git commits from the encrypted bundle and its
explicit prerequisites.
- Keep independent snapshot download, restoration, source checks, writer
guards, encryption, and atomic publication.
- Document the supported import sources and the remaining
tenant-enrollment gaps.

## Verification

- Before production edits, two new regressions failed on archived status
and historical task binding.
- Final focused verification: 58 tests pass across remote-workspace
migration and isolated task-directory restoration.
- Real PostgreSQL, Git repositories, encrypted storage, and restored
file bytes cover cold restoration after removing the old folder and
source object, pruned unpushed history, index and worktree edits,
corrupt/missing/expired sources, binding changes, and source-folder
races.
- A Git fixture initially lacked runtime ownership metadata. Correcting
the fixture made the valid retained-source case pass; no production
validation was weakened.
- Full repository typecheck and build passed. Full `pnpm test:run`
stopped in chat integration shard 2 after two failures: a retry-notice
timeout and a subsequent fake-timer error. All four cases in that
retry-notice group passed in a separate focused rerun without source
changes; the complete suite has not passed locally. All exact-head CI
jobs passed. The separate Paperclip Review app check is still queued;
all existing review threads are resolved. Server typecheck passed after
the review fixes.
- Both review findings were reproduced: the real cleanup owner's
verified-tip receipt was rejected, and a lost upload reply for a legacy
Git source failed with `operation_content_changed`. The fixes accept the
owner's scoped receipt metadata and rebuild reconstructed Git indexes
from their staged trees. Both regressions now pass, including retained
staged and unstaged edits.
- Additional coverage restores from a fresh HTTP clone after deleting
the original repository, imports a nested local checkout with encrypted
settings, and rejects an unapproved nested source without publishing
remote authority.
- This PR does not claim a completed tenant enrollment or a new
zero-downtime deployment proof.

## Risks

Imports can fail when old receipts or repository objects are
unavailable. They retain their migration journal and leave the original
state intact. Operators must resolve pending writers and recovery before
importing. Shared physical roots, nested worktrees, and unresolved
sandbox recovery require separate migration work. This change does not
remove those blockers or alter automatic retention.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. This session does not expose a more specific serving model ID
or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either linked existing issues or described the issue in-PR
following the relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task
ID or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run the focused tests locally and they pass; full
typecheck/build passed and the full-suite failure is documented
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 13:36:22 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 5e4cc01073 feat(workspaces): keep remote files off the webserver disk (#18403)
Keep native sandbox workspace files independent of the webserver disk. Use encrypted saved versions and Postgres ownership so a replacement server can recover files and continue work. Enable the path by default for new eligible workspaces when durable storage is configured.

Preserve explicit opt-outs and existing host workspaces. Include safe snapshot repair, Files access, import, migration and retention. Bound saved-Files resources, preserve imported Git recovery, reject unfinished Git operations, publish immutable concurrent captures, and verify permanent object-version deletion.

Validated 471 targeted local controls, build/typechecks, all 40 CI partitions, fresh Greptile 5/5 and security review. The PR records original failed attempts and scoped retries.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-31 14:54:01 -05:00