mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-31 06:04:11 +01:00
26d71d8def8b00acc3520090c8ebe57b1cdf5ff5
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
45c99a0d06 |
fix(adapters): default legacy harnesses and connected tools to full auto (#13693)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and their work. > - Legacy adapters launch provider CLIs and expose connected tools. > - Existing defaults did not consistently grant full automatic permission. > - Remote Claude used a fixed tool list that omitted MCP tools and future tools. > - Direct Codex launches and OpenCode configuration also used narrower defaults. > - This change gives all these paths the same full-auto default as native runners. > - Explicit restrictive settings continue to work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13686. This PR is stacked on that native-runner and task-reassignment PR. Merge #13686 first. Related: #831 (constructed Claude agents), #1935 (adapter-switching permission defaults). ## What Changed - Use actual Claude permission bypass for local and remote runs and probes. Remove the fixed tool list so MCP and future provider tools are included. - Identify actual managed sandbox targets to Claude with `IS_SANDBOX=1`. Do not mark ordinary host execution as a sandbox. - Default direct Codex execution to approval and sandbox bypass, matching agent creation. Preserve explicit false, CLI profiles, sandbox modes, approval policy, and network restrictions. - Set OpenCode's full-auto runtime permission to `allow` for every tool and connection. Preserve the existing explicit opt-out. - Default Gemini probes to the same YOLO mode as execution. Make the legacy ACP `default` alias use `approve-all` for fresh and resumed sessions. - Add default, opt-out, remote, probe, connected-tool, and resume regression tests. Update adapter configuration documentation. - Other adapter paths already request full automatic permission or have no provider approval gate. ## Verification - Full workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed locally after rebasing onto current master. Targeted adapter/server and legacy ACP tests passed, including defaults, explicit opt-outs, remote launches, connected tools, and fresh/resumed sessions. - Greptile reviewed current head `8ca135eaffcf9cfdba6f1368e896a781a0891d50` at **5/5**. The security reviewer acknowledged the documented full-auto requirement. Acknowledged discussions are resolved. - Current head has **54 passing checks**. [PR checks](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13693/checks). The process-adapter signoff browser shard passed on one retry after its first attempt exceeded a three-second issue-run wait. - **Six native Claude/Codex real-provider cases passed on their first attempt, with cleanup passing**, against the combined branch: plans, reassignment, and backlog creation/status. [Campaign and downloadable evidence](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35469926548). This does not claim a real-provider run of every legacy adapter. - The live-tested revision is `a37881c824dcd7170380fc4b788732fc743e5da7`. The current head differs only in the corrected heartbeat test expectation; application code is identical. - The campaign result-enforcement job passed. The separate report publisher failed during frozen dependency installation because the trusted workflow's patched-dependency configuration does not match its lockfile. Passing case evidence remains downloadable from the workflow. - Full-suite coverage comes from CI partitions. The separate unsharded local run was stopped after the corresponding CI partitions passed; it is not counted as a completed local run. ## Risks - Missing permission settings now grant all provider operations, including connected tools. OpenCode full-auto also overrides ambient provider permission rules. An explicit Paperclip permission opt-out preserves restrictive behavior. - Claude refuses full bypass as root outside an identified sandbox. Ordinary host deployments must run Claude as a non-root user. Managed sandbox launches include the required marker. - These defaults do not grant additional Paperclip roles, connections, or company access. Existing controller authorization and governance still apply. - This PR depends on #13686. Retarget it to master after that PR merges. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with code execution and repository tools. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ee3ed0117e |
fix(opencode): register configured model in runtime config (#10178)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agent runs depend on adapters translating Paperclip configuration into each agent runtime's native configuration > - The OpenCode local adapter passes configured models through the `--model provider/model` argument > - OpenCode only resolves that argument when the model id exists in the provider's runtime `models` map > - Valid provider-served model ids missing from OpenCode's bundled catalog therefore fail locally with `Model not found` > - This pull request registers the configured model in the injected runtime configuration without overwriting explicit provider definitions > - The benefit is that uncataloged routing variants and newly released models resolve while cataloged models retain their metadata ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have searched existing open and closed issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] I can reproduce this on current `master`. - [x] I have confirmed the error originates in Paperclip's OpenCode adapter rather than the provider or local configuration. ### What happened? OpenCode local runs failed with `Model not found` when a configured `provider/model` id was valid at the provider but absent from OpenCode's bundled model catalog. OpenRouter routing variants such as model ids ending in `:nitro` are one example. ### Expected behavior Any configured provider-served model id should resolve when Paperclip starts OpenCode, including ids not yet present in the bundled catalog. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Configure the OpenCode local adapter with a valid provider/model id that is absent from OpenCode's bundled catalog. 2. Start an agent run. 3. Observe that OpenCode rejects the `--model` value with `Model not found` before the session starts. ### Paperclip version or commit Current `master` before this change. ### Deployment mode Local dev using the OpenCode local adapter and an existing provider API key. ### Installation method Built from source. ### Agent adapter(s) involved OpenCode local. ### Database mode Not database-related. ### Relevant logs or output `Model not found` ### Additional context Reproduced with OpenCode 1.15.5. No duplicate or related public GitHub issues or pull requests were found. ### Privacy checklist - [x] I have reviewed all pasted output for sensitive information and no secrets or PII are included. ## What Changed - Register the configured `provider/model` id as an empty custom model entry in the injected `opencode.json` provider configuration. - Preserve explicit model definitions from user configuration and `PAPERCLIP_OPENCODE_PROVIDERS`. - Skip registration for model strings that do not use the `provider/model` form. - Add focused coverage for uncataloged models, explicit definitions, and invalid model strings. ## Verification - `cd packages/adapters/opencode-local && pnpm exec vitest run src/server/runtime-config.test.ts` — 14 tests passed. - `cd packages/adapters/opencode-local && pnpm exec tsc --noEmit` — passed. - Manual reproduction with OpenCode 1.15.5: the uncataloged OpenRouter routing variant fails without the injected model entry and resolves with it. ## Risks - Low risk: the empty entry deep-merges with catalog metadata for known models, and existing explicit model definitions take precedence. - The behavior is limited to syntactically valid `provider/model` configuration values in the OpenCode local adapter. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, exact runtime model `gpt-5.6-sol` (context-window size not exposed by the runtime), with reasoning, tool use, terminal execution, and code-editing capabilities. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Jannes StubbemannandClaude Opus 4.8
|
1ac1ba5442 |
feat(opencode-local): env-driven gateway routing (custom providers, small/cheap model, remote allow-all) (#7837)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The `opencode-local` adapter runs the OpenCode harness; its
model/provider routing assumes built-in providers (anthropic/openai/...)
and their default models
> - Deployments increasingly put an OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible LLM
gateway between the harness and the model for cost, governance, or
data-residency reasons: LiteLLM, OpenRouter, Portkey, Kong, a corporate
proxy, self-hosted models (vLLM/Ollama), or region-pinned/sovereign
endpoints. But OpenCode only resolves `--model provider/model` when the
model is registered in a provider's `models` map, and
`OPENCODE_ALLOW_ALL_MODELS` does NOT bypass its internal `getModel()`
> - Several lanes also fall back to built-in default models the gateway
may not serve: the auxiliary/title model (e.g. `claude-haiku-*`) and the
budget/recovery "cheap" lane (`openai/gpt-5.1-codex-mini`); these abort
runs with "no keys found that support model"
> - This pull request makes the adapter's provider/model wiring
declarative via env, so any such deployment can register gateway models
+ pin the auxiliary/budget lanes without code changes; nothing here is
specific to one hosting setup
> - The benefit is OpenCode works behind any compatible gateway with
config only; with no env set, behavior is unchanged
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No existing issue; describing in-PR (feature / adapter enhancement).
- **Gap:** there is no supported way to register custom/gateway
providers + models for `opencode-local`, nor to pin the auxiliary
(title-gen) and budget (recovery) model lanes, so routing OpenCode
through a gateway fails at `getModel()` or on the default helper models.
- Related: #5737 (exe.dev sandbox installs for gemini/opencode local),
#5823 (unblock claude_local on remote sandbox providers).
> Note on ROADMAP: this is adapter-level, opt-in config (defaults
unchanged) that *enables* gateway routing for one harness; it is not the
core "Cloud / Sandbox agents" platform work itself. Happy to
redirect/discuss in #dev if preferred.
## What Changed
- `PAPERCLIP_OPENCODE_PROVIDERS`: merge custom/extended providers
(OpenCode `provider` shape) into the runtime `opencode.json`, so gateway
models are registered and `--model provider/model` resolves. `{env:VAR}`
placeholders are expanded server-side (so a key need not depend on the
sandbox run env).
- A malformed `PAPERCLIP_OPENCODE_PROVIDERS` is no longer silently
ignored: invalid JSON, a non-object value, and individual provider
entries with non-object values (which are skipped by name) each append a
visible note to the run notes so the misconfiguration is diagnosable
(addresses both review P1s).
- `PAPERCLIP_OPENCODE_SMALL_MODEL` / `PAPERCLIP_OPENCODE_CHEAP_MODEL`:
pin the auxiliary (title-generation) and budget (recovery-retry) lanes
to gateway-served models; defaults unchanged.
- Honour `OPENCODE_ALLOW_ALL_MODELS` on the **remote** execution path
too (was local-only, a parity gap).
- `PAPERCLIP_OPENCODE_PRINT_LOGS`: optional toggle adding `--print-logs`
so OpenCode logs surface on stderr for diagnosing remote/sandbox runs.
- `buildOpenCodeModelProfiles()` guards its `process.env` default with
`typeof process` so the shared client/server module stays browser-safe
(a bare `process.env` at module load threw ReferenceError in the browser
under Vite dev middleware and broke UI rendering in the e2e lane).
## Verification
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-opencode-local build` and
`typecheck` (tsc clean)
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapters/opencode-local/src` shows 33
passing (incl. new tests for the provider merge, `{env:}` expansion, the
malformed/non-object/skipped-entry provider notes, small/cheap-model
resolution, and the remote allow-all bypass)
- Manually verified end-to-end against a real
OpenAI-/Anthropic-compatible gateway: with the providers + small/cheap
model set, both the title-gen and main task route to the configured
gateway model and the agent completes (a real completion is returned and
billed). That deployment supplies the verification evidence; the
mechanism is gateway-agnostic.
## Risks
Low. Everything is env-driven and opt-in; with no env set the generated
config output is unchanged, and the cheap model profile keeps its model
(the only difference is its updated human-readable description).
Defaults preserved: built-in providers, Codex-mini cheap lane with
`variant: low`, no `--print-logs`. No migration/UI impact.
## Model Used
Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`, 1M context), extended thinking +
tool use, via Claude Code.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md (adapter-level opt-in config enabling
gateway routing; not the core sandbox-platform work, noted above)
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above (#5737, #5823)
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues OR (b) described the
issue in-PR following the relevant issue template
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots (n/a, no UI)
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (env
vars documented inline via comments; no central doc references the
adapter env yet)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
(the P1 about silently dropped malformed providers JSON is addressed in
|
||
|
dottaandPaperclip
|
ed62d58cb2 |
Fix headless OpenCode permission prompts
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |