Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
a3313f6944 fix(ui): complete read recovery and enforce query error rendering (#18822)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets people manage agent work through the board.
> - The board reads task, agent, settings, plugin, and run data from the
server.
> - A deploy can interrupt those reads after content is already visible.
> - Local error branches can replace that content with an error or show
raw codes.
> - This pull request moves the remaining reads to the shared recovery
behavior.
> - The query-error guard prevents new local error patterns from
returning.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**
Loaded lists, settings, task panels, and manual reads could clear their
content or show errors during a server restart. Some reads also disabled
the shared retry policy.

**Expected behavior**
Keep loaded content during a temporary failure. Show the shared
connection banner. Retry reads after recovery. Replace content after a
real access denial or missing resource, with readable copy.

**Steps to reproduce**
Open a task, settings page, or run log. Return 503 with
`tenant_app_unavailable` from the API. Restore the API and check that
content refreshes. Repeat with 403 and 404 to check the failure state.

Related merged work: Refs #15754, Refs #15772, Refs #17960. This change
covers remaining reads and enforcement. Browser persistence and the
outage browser suite follow separately.

## What Changed

- Repair an existing PostgreSQL deadline fixture at UTC boundaries. A
daily cap defers a heartbeat until both its original interval and the
next UTC day allow it. Keep the counted run in its seeded day and cover
noon, just before midnight and the first second after midnight with
explicit clocks and real PostgreSQL. Production scheduling is unchanged.

- Integrate the saved list, settings, shell, task, and manual-read
recovery changes against current master. Preserve the current task,
Inbox, and run-log structure.
- Add `useResilientFetch` for component-local reads. Preserve loaded
data, cancel stale requests, and retry through the shared connectivity
policy. Keep browser and pairing capabilities in memory.
- Retain run log chunks across stream changes and catch up after
recovery without duplicate chunks or stalled requests.
- Keep genuine authorization and missing-resource failures visible.
Translate known single-word codes such as `forbidden`. Show known skills
and disconnected-app failures before sibling loading states. Keep Retry
bound to its failed request.
- Make the query-error guard enforce by default and run it in the CI
policy job. Document the narrow exceptions and the read recovery
contract.
- Invalidate pending OAuth discovery when the operator leaves setup or
its context changes. Keep reserved-popup cleanup bound to the current
attempt.

## Verification

- Current read head `09d1db29dea` is merge-ready: all 59 check runs are
completed (54 successful, three skipped, two neutral), the legacy Snyk
status is successful, and both required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`
gates pass. Greptile Apex reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no
unresolved threads; the branch has no merge conflicts. The current CI
run is `41748339602`.
- Current read head `09d1db29dea` includes master `683fa4725e9`. The
latest change touches only the existing server deadline test fixture.
Application source remains the previously verified `86376fa751e`
revision: all 60 affected skills/disconnected-app tests and both
application UI typechecks passed, along with token gates and the
enforcing query-error guard. Those UI suites were not repeated for this
test-only repair.
- The fixture repair passes all seven deadline integration cases and the
complete server typecheck, including the server test layer. The old
assertion deterministically fails at 23:59:06.888 UTC; its
one-second-old run also fails the first-second-of-day probe. The
corrected fixture passes noon and both midnight probes. The permanent
three-case coverage uses seeded 2099 clocks.
- Twelve new regressions fail against the previous implementation. Both
skills variants and disconnected-app pages show either request's 403 or
429 while the sibling pauses or remains fetching. Permission failures
stay visible. Retry stays usable for its failed request and recovers
independently. An initial test-fixture query-key typo was corrected
before the passing run. The finding is replied to and resolved. Greptile
reviewed prior application revision `86376fa751e` at 5/5 with no new
actionable findings or unresolved threads. The current test-only head
has now received its own Apex 5/5 review with no unresolved threads, and
its CI is successful as recorded above.
- The preceding OAuth fix passed all 237 setup tests on both application
branches. Its ten regressions prove that Back, Cancel, unmount, or
context changes retire initial discovery without creating a connection,
caching old identities, navigating an abandoned popup, or closing a
newer attempt.
- Earlier master integration `e992f770339` passed all 309 tests across
eight affected Slack, recovery, retry, submission and task files, plus
UI typecheck, token gates, enforcing query-error scan and seven guard
tests. The integration preserves Slack workspace reconnect and shared
recovery, readable execution errors, source-inspection company scoping,
and current submission behavior. Newly inherited retained-file recovery
controls keep cached data through transient failures and hide it after
definitive denial.
- The preceding cache head `97c0bc3966f` passed 1,038 focused
cache/write/editor/account/task/API tests. All 22 built-UI
outage/write/loading cases passed in 4.7 minutes on exact browser head
`b7deaaee5da`, with strict checking of all three specs. The latest
skills/app rendering fix is covered by its affected component suites;
those broader cases were not repeated for this separate read path.
- Historical broader UI, CLI and build results and unresolved aggregate
server/DB/adapter failures remain in the PR discussion. Interrupted CI
runs were audited and recorded separately; they are not counted as
passes. Controlled local outages do not prove hosted authentication or a
real Cloud restart/deploy. Real hosted acceptance remains required after
merge and deployment.

Commands for the latest fix:

```sh
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/CompanySkills.test.tsx src/pages/apps/AppNotConnected.test.tsx
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck
pnpm check:token-gates
node scripts/check-query-error-rendering.mjs --enforce --summary
```

## Risks

This migration touches many read surfaces. The main risks are initial
loading, request cancellation, retained authorization state, and run-log
paging. The tests cover those states. There are no server, schema,
dependency, or API contract changes. The follow-up browser suite and
hosted deploy acceptance are required before release acceptance.

Recovered commits retain their original authors. If squash-merging,
preserve `Co-Authored-By: Bender (Fable) <bender@agents.paperclip.ing>`
and the Paperclip trailer.

## Model Used

OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex, with xhigh reasoning effort, tool
use, and code execution. The context window size is not exposed. Saved
source commits keep their original authorship.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the bug report template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
ticket id
- [x] The affected local tests pass; broader limitations are recorded
above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Bender (Fable) <bender@agents.paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-04 14:07:18 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip e40de0c9e8 perf(ci): refresh test weights and narrow graph dependencies (#18464)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Contributors need fast, reliable CI feedback.
> - Diff-aware CI selects test files and partitions them into runner
jobs.
> - Stale cost estimates put several slow suites on the same runner.
Broad imports also couple small tests to large modules.
> - This PR refreshes test costs, runs independent graph discovery in
parallel, and narrows three dependency boundaries.
> - Selection safeguards and CODEOWNER-only AWS routing stay in force.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18398. This follows the audit of [PR #18427's verification
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41169978784).

The audit found 403 selected general-server files without timing
weights. Three suites measured at 232s, 122s and 116s shared one shard
because each received a roughly 2s fallback weight. Local graph
discovery across four projects took 43.7s serially and 21.7s with two
workers. A reverse-order repeat took 37.7s serially and 22.6s with two
workers. Both comparisons produced identical selection results. This is
a local measurement, not a claim about production CI speed.

## What Changed

- Refresh general-server costs for 1,285 of 1,309 current files and
serialized costs for all 163 files from two successful protected-master
Cloud readiness runs. Retain prior costs for unmeasured files, including
dedicated chat and native-runner suites.
- Record passing server file costs, including collection, setup and
environment preparation. A weekly hosted workflow validates trusted
source runs and opens a timing-only PR. It tests shard coverage, pauses
while a refresh PR is open, and never merges automatically.
- Discover at most two project graphs concurrently in isolated,
heap-limited Node processes. Cache repeated inventory reads within one
selection. Worker errors and timeouts retain the full task plan.
- Fetch only the merge commit and parents for the selector. A real
shallow-clone regression proves the complete diff still includes more
than 300 files, renames and deletions.
- Share the identical log viewer and run details between both
AgentDetail pages. The viewer test imports the shared implementation and
runs each of its 13 distinct cases once.
- Extract the pure API error class while preserving the API client's
public exports. Import delivery work signals through their existing
narrow DB export.

## Verification

- PASS: `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`.
- PASS: 284 CI selection, timing, shallow-diff, sharding and routing
tests.
- PASS: 74 further cache, routing and graph-proof tests.
- PASS: 94 targeted UI assertions across the viewer, run invocation, API
errors/client and progress helpers. All 76 assertions in the 12 server
suites made independently selectable also pass.
- PASS: `pnpm check:token-gates`, module-boundary checks, YAML parsing
and `git diff --check`.
- PASS: [Full PR CI and required `ci / verify`
aggregate](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41206683345),
including all 12 general-server shards, all nine serialized shards,
workspace groups, chat suites, Runner lanes and build checks.
- PASS: [GitHub hosted real-workspace selector and cache/routing
qualification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41206683205).
- PASS: Both Greptile and Paperclip reviews are 5/5 with no actionable
findings or inline comments on `7dc65c51b8`. The PR has no merge
conflicts.
- PASS: The production refresh parser accepted all 107 structured
file-cost records from a real successful server CI job, including
setup/loading cost.
- Local `pnpm test:run` completed all six chat shards successfully. The
duplicate monolithic local run was stopped after the complete remote
suite passed; it was not completed locally.

The focused log-viewer command improved from 18.84s (26 duplicate
variant cases) to 8.49s (all 13 distinct behavior cases). The dependency
audit confirms 12 server files and the API-error test no longer need
conservative always-run retention. Repartitioning the audited PR with
the new costs changes the slowest shard from 810s to 591s of summed
historical test execution (1,124 of 1,142 files measured). This is a
workload simulation, not measured new CI wall time.

## Risks

- Two graph processes use more peak memory. Each has a 2 GiB heap limit
and a three-minute timeout. Any failure preserves the original task
plan. Real workspace qualification runs in GitHub CI.
- Historical logs contain test/hook costs only. New reporter records add
loading/setup costs after merge. The manifests identify measurement
coverage and source runs. These weights change placement, never
permission to skip tests.
- Runner load adds timing noise. The refresh uses medians and requires
at least 90% measurement coverage in each lane.
- GitHub may require approval to run checks on a PR created with
`GITHUB_TOKEN`. Refreshes remain reviewable and do not merge themselves.
- The shared viewer is a mechanical extraction. Both pages retain their
existing exports, and the behavior assertions remain covered. AWS runner
authorization is unchanged.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with repository inspection, reasoning, code
execution and GitHub tools. The exact deployment ID and context-window
size were not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub references)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks and six
chat shards; complete suite passed in CI as detailed above)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-31 11:05:12 -05:00
39279aa34f feat(ui): shared error, connectivity and query foundation for disconnects (#15754)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The board reads API data and keeps the current task on screen.
> - A restart or temporary network failure can interrupt those reads.
> - Separate page error handlers can hide cached data or expose raw
server codes.
> - The app needs one connection state, readable error copy and a
consistent read policy.
> - This change provides that foundation and moves affected read
surfaces onto it.
> - The dependent write layer in #17960 preserves edits and submissions
across the same failures.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

Temporary API failures could replace loaded content with errors.
Different surfaces handled the same outage differently. Some showed raw
server codes. A successful query to an unrelated service could also
falsely report that Paperclip had recovered.

**Expected behavior**

Keep cached content visible. Show one connection banner during sustained
trouble. Confirm recovery through the Paperclip health probe or its
WebSocket. Retry transient reads and show readable errors for permanent
failures.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Open a populated task or workspace page.
2. Interrupt API requests with a 503 or a dropped connection.
3. Keep an unrelated external request in flight.
4. Confirm that cached content remains and that the external result
cannot clear the outage.
5. Restore the API and check that reads refresh.

The write layer first merged into this feature branch in #15769 now has
its own dependent PR, #17960. This PR contains the shared foundation and
read changes. Merge this PR first.

## What Changed

- Classify API errors and provide readable error copy, including
non-JSON proxy responses and Retry-After handling.
- Use one connection store and health probe with bounded backoff.
Confirm recovery from the server health probe or live-updates WebSocket.
- Pause reads while disconnected, retry transient errors, and refresh
active reads after recovery.
- Keep cached data visible through shared query views and affected page,
panel and plugin read surfaces.
- Add one app-level connection banner and support the pending-write
count consumed by the dependent write layer.
- Add a query-error rendering guard. Call it directly from the existing
CI step. Update development documentation.

## Verification

- Historical-chat lookup now follows the same ready/stale roster state
as rendering. Three regressions fail before the fix; the six new cases
pass after it, including working Retry, fresh data, no-cache error,
permanent 403 and company isolation. All six focused query/recovery
suites pass 200 tests. Final-commit CI passes and Apex is 5/5 with no
unresolved findings. Canary Dry Run initially refused a preview version
that was already on npm. It passed after one rerun with fresh registry
metadata; no check was disabled.

- Integrated current master and retained both transcript interest
registration and connectivity reporting on socket open. The seven
focused recovery/query suites pass 288 tests, and UI typecheck and
production build pass. All 9,451 UI tests across 799 files pass on the
merge commit. Final-commit CI passes and Apex is 5/5 with no unresolved
findings.

- Current head `70d9335d732219352ef0f98414439766bbcb33df`: all hosted CI
checks pass. Apex is **5/5** on that head with no unresolved findings.
The branch has no merge conflict. GitHub still requires code-owner
approval.

- The foundation passes 9,430 UI tests in 804 files. After integrating
current master page paths, 190 focused page tests pass.
- Two unrelated-success regressions fail before the latest fix. With the
fix, 62 focused UI tests, all six guard tests and UI TypeScript pass.
- The composed foundation and write layer pass **9,505 UI tests in 808
files**, UI TypeScript, a production UI build, and query-error, token
and map guards.
- A real Chromium journey on the composed source injects a 503 during
title save. The loaded task stays visible; one reconnect banner appears;
the edit saves after recovery; another task stays unchanged; the saved
title survives reload.
- Full recursive local checks were not repeated because Runner
compilation exhausted local disk during another repair. Hosted checks
must pass before merge. No new staging deployment is claimed.

- Latest review follow-up: a cached CaseDetail now survives a failed
HTTP 429 refresh. Its page regression fails before the fix and passes
after it. Eighty focused foundation tests, UI TypeScript, build and
guards pass after that change.
- Earlier CI evidence is retained: several foundation jobs received a
runner shutdown signal together. The write-layer head also failed an
unchanged Runner descriptor close test with `provider_transport_failed`.
The same Runner source passed that suite in the foundation run. New CI
runs cover the updated heads; no check or assertion was weakened.

## Risks

- Shared retry defaults change the time before transient read errors
appear. Permanent errors still fail promptly.
- ApiError.message now contains readable copy. Callers that compare raw
codes must use ApiError.code.
- Cache success can come from another service or local data. It must not
confirm Paperclip recovery.
- Durable writes are reviewed separately in #17960. This PR does not
change database or mutation contracts.

## Model Used

Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) produced the original work
with tool use. OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, assisted with restoration,
integration, tests and review fixes. The Codex session does not expose
its exact serving model ID or context window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Amy (Opus) <claude@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-27 21:22:07 -07:00