PaperClipAI

0 Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git synced 2026-11-08 12:33:05 +01:00

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
DottaandPaperclip	b7ef307a65	fix(workspaces): wait for an ended writer's save instead of failing setup (#19074 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agent runs can use a remote task workspace in a sandbox. One writer run at a time holds that workspace. > - When a writer run ends, its workspace save and sandbox release finish a few minutes later. The writer hold stays until then. > - A new run that started in that interval failed with `setup_failed`: "The workspace still has an unfinished writer or save operation." > - A live writer already makes the new run wait (`workspace_busy`, added in #18691). An ended writer that is still settling did not. > - This pull request reports the ended writer as the holder too, so the new run waits instead of failing. > - The benefit is that work continues automatically after a short settle interval. Users do not see a failed run and a blocked task. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18691 What happened? A task run failed during workspace setup with `setup_failed` and the error "The workspace still has an unfinished writer or save operation." The previous run on the same task had ended a few seconds before. Its sandbox lease was released 4 to 17 minutes later. A staging soak recorded 31 of these failures over 14 tasks in about 29 hours. What did you expect to happen? The new run waits for the workspace, as it does when the previous writer is still running. It continues when the save and release settle. Steps to reproduce 1. Bind a task to a remote workspace whose authority has `dirty: true` and a `writerRunId` for a run with status `failed` that ended now. 2. Wake the task's agent. 3. The run fails with `setup_failed`. No retry is scheduled. ## What Changed - `reserveRemoteWorkspace` now throws `RemoteWorkspaceWriterActiveError` for an ended writer whose save or sandbox release has not settled. Before, it threw a plain 409 conflict. The error keeps the same message, status and `remote_workspace_writer_pending` code. It uses the writer's `finishedAt` as its last activity and sets `ended: true`. - Workspace preparation already converts that error to a `workspace_busy` deferral with the one-hour holder cutoff. It now passes `holderEnded` to the deferral. - `WorkspaceBusyDeferral` says "ended, but its workspace save has not settled" for an ended holder, instead of "is still running". - A writer that is missing or has no task still gets the plain conflict, as before. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the wait and its cutoff. ## Verification - Red before the fix: the new test "waits for a writer that just ended while its save or sandbox release settles" failed. The run had `status: failed`, `errorCode: setup_failed`, `executionRecovery.kind: bootstrap`. This is the same result as the staging failures. - Green after the fix: `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-remote-workspace-busy.test.ts src/services/remote-workspace-reservation.test.ts` (16 tests pass.) - Safety cases in the new tests: - The waiting run does not change the workspace authority. The unsaved writer's files and hold stay unchanged. - A writer that ended more than one hour ago still causes the unfinished-writer setup failure, with no scheduled retry. The wait is bounded. - Existing cases still pass: live writer wait with Stop and reassignment, the concurrent reservation race (`remote_workspace_writer_pending`), and the unused-reservation takeover. - Also run: `remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts`, `heartbeat-workspace-busy.test.ts`, `remote-workspace-save-concurrency.test.ts`, `workspace-recovery.test.ts`. All 6 suites pass (442 tests). - Not done: a live run on staging at this revision. The fix is not deployed. ## Risks - A task whose ended writer never settles now makes up to about one hour of short `workspace_busy` waits (one scheduled retry every 1 to 2 minutes) before it fails. Before, it failed at once. The end state after the cutoff is the same. - Some of the staging failures have other causes that this change does not fix: - A previous run that stays `running` with no output for more than one hour still causes this failure, as intended. - A dirty workspace whose writer ended without a saved result (for example a workspace finalization retry that never runs) still blocks the task after the cutoff. These need separate fixes. - No schema, API or UI changes. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, browser reads of staging run records) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 17:39:26 -06:00
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5	aa8372fd5d	fix(accounting): post late usage to its owning run (#18991 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native Runner sessions keep one provider conversation across task turns, so Paperclip accounts usage per run. > - Codex can report more usage for a turn after its run's charge was posted. > - The Runner then marked the session `reconciliation_required`. If another run was attached, it also failed that run. Core refused the delivery with `native_usage_after_finalization_requires_reconciliation`. > - That usage has already happened. Blocking the session cannot undo it, and the debt waited for an operator while the run totals stayed wrong. > - Codex totals are cumulative, and the Runner already knows the owning run in most cases. So the correct amount can be posted automatically. > - This pull request reports the exact increment with its owner, and posts it to the owning run as a separate cost event. > - The benefit is that run accounting becomes correct without stopping work, and an old run's usage can no longer fail a newer run. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No issue exists. I searched open and closed pull requests and issues for "late usage", `native_usage_after_finalization_requires_reconciliation` and `codex_usage_accounting_integrity`. I found no duplicate. What happened? Code review found this while diagnosing session recovery failures. When Codex reported usage above the known total for a turn that was not active, the Runner blocked the session. If that turn belonged to a previous run, the Runner also failed the attached run with `codex_usage_accounting_integrity`. Core kept the receipt as debt, and could correct it automatically only if the token counts were unchanged. Expected behavior Late usage does not stop any run or session. The charge goes to the run that used the tokens, and it is auditable. Steps to reproduce 1. Finish a Codex turn on a native Runner session and attach the next run. 2. Have Codex send `thread/tokenUsage/updated` with a higher total for the finished turn. 3. On the unfixed code, the attached run fails and later attaches are refused. `late_codex_usage_requires_durable_reconciliation_before_or_after_handoff` encoded this behavior. Paperclip version or commit `master` at `04a24f4e06`. Deployment mode Any deployment that uses a native Runner with Codex. ## What Changed - Runner: late usage no longer sets `reconciliation_required` or fails a run. For a turn that belongs to a previous run, the Runner emits `usage.reported` with the increment in `runDelta` and the owner in `reconciliation.priorOrigin`. `runDeltaAvailable` stays `false`, so an older Core does not bill it to the attached run. - `CodexRunUsage::absorb_late_usage`: treats only usage above the known thread total as late, and keeps the attached run's delta unchanged. A report at or below that total adds nothing, so the sum across runs always equals the thread total and a replay cannot charge twice. - Delivery: `captureLateUsageForOwner` stores the increment as a late receipt on the owning run. The owner must be a finished run in the same company and native session. If the Runner cannot name the owner, Core uses the session's last finished run and records the attribution as `inferred`. - Local Runner: late usage stays with the run that is active when it arrives, or the next run. Usage reported between two runs stays in the next run's delta, so the total stays exact. - Accounting: `reconcileLateRunUsageReceiptInTransaction` posts a token increase as a new cost event with the key `heartbeat:<run>:late:<receipt>`. It updates the run totals so the accounting integrity check still agrees, records `cost.late_usage_posted` in the activity log, and queues budget evaluation. - No more refusal: `persistUsageReceipt` no longer throws after it saves late evidence, so late usage cannot wedge a Runner outbox. - Covered receipts: an older same-source receipt at or below the accepted totals, with matching billing, is cleared because a newer cumulative receipt already covers it. Conflicting billing stays as debt. - Older Runners: a zero-filled invalidation stays on the delivering run. - Unchanged: a newer lower total, a changed model or billing type, and per-model receipts stay as visible accounting debt for an operator. - Unchanged: an unexpected provider message during the warm attachment drain still fails closed. A separate change addresses that gate. - Docs: added "Late provider usage" to `doc/execution-semantics.md`. ## Verification - `cd packages/paperclip-runner/runner && cargo test --locked -p paperclip-runner-core --test codex_provider`: 99 passed, 2 ignored. - `cargo test --locked -p paperclip-runner-core --lib codex_usage`: 7 passed. This includes new tests for the out-of-order and repeated report cases. - `cd server && pnpm exec vitest run src/services/run-cost-accounting.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-usage-delivery.integration.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-recovery-usage-delivery.test.ts src/__tests__/cost-data-quality.test.ts`: passed against embedded PostgreSQL before the last review fixes, and the accounting and delivery files were re-run after them. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p .` in `server` reports no errors. - New tests cover exact and inferred owners, repeated delivery, late usage that arrives before the owner's charge posts, another session's run, an older Runner's report with no increment, a same-run increase, and a lower total. They also run the accounting integrity check after posting. - Review: Greptile Apex scored 1/5, 4/5, 3/5, 2/5 and 4/5 while findings were fixed, then 5/5 at the current head. - Local Runner: driver tests cover usage reported between two runs, including across a restore. No end-to-end local run has exercised it. - Not run locally: the full test suite. CI provides that coverage. - Not verified live: a read-only check of a test deployment found no late receipts in its history, so this path has only run against fixtures. ## Risks - Run totals can rise after a run finishes. This is deliberate. The correction is a separate cost event and an activity log entry. - Budgets are corrected after the fact. A late charge can put an agent over budget after later work has started. Budget evaluation runs after each correction, but it cannot prevent that work. - Local sessions accept imperfect attribution by design. Their late usage can land on the active or next run, because local sessions have no durable path for routing it. This also applies after a Stop or a pause. The total stays exact. - Out-of-order reports can leave tokens on the wrong run in the session. If a prior turn's report arrives after the attached run has already counted past that total, those tokens stay on the attached run. Moving them would need a lower correction to the attached run. The total stays exact. - Inferred attribution can name the wrong run in the session. The usage still belongs to that session and the total stays correct. The attribution is recorded as `inferred`. - A session with no finished run charges the delivering run, as an inferred late charge after its own charge posts. - Rollout order: deploy Core before the Runner. An older Core would keep this event on the attached run as incomplete usage, and would still refuse a same-run late receipt. - Migrations: this change has no migration. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be reworked. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), through Claude Code, with tool use and code execution. A human directed the design and approved the scope. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-04 15:30:55 -08:00
Dotta Paperclip Devin Foley	7d1e9b3477	fix(recovery): retain exact warm native export sources (#17916 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native task recovery must save unfinished workspace exports before continuation. > - A prepared export can still refer to a sandbox with a warm reuse policy. > - The strict recovery inspector rejects that policy and exhausts source verification. > - Ordinary reuse must not give the same unfinished allocation to another run. > - An existing user Retry can authorize bounded file maintenance after exact ownership checks. > - This change retains that exact source and preserves the original failure record. > - Recovery completes only when files, stop evidence and policy settlement agree. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A failed native run has a prepared `keep_running` workspace export. Its exact sandbox lease still has `reuse_by_environment` policy. Native export cleanup can preserve that policy while it stops the sandbox. Generic workspace recovery then rejects the source with `lease_policy_not_retained`. A saved user Retry remains blocked before file export. Expected behavior Keep unfinished exports out of ordinary warm reuse. With current user authority and an unchanged saved Retry, retain the exact source for one bounded maintenance generation. Preserve files and return continuation to normal admission. Keep all ambiguous sources held. Steps to reproduce 1. Prepare a native workspace export with a warm sandbox and `keep_running` disposition. 2. Save a normal board Retry for the failed source run. 3. Persist its first exhausted source-verification failure before file export. 4. Run the normal maintenance worker. Before this change, source policy rejection leaves the saved files unrestored. Refs #17773 for source diagnostics. Related #17839 records a missing preservation obligation during blocked restart. This change handles an existing prepared warm export whose verification already failed. ## What Changed - Exclude unfinished physical allocations from reuse and obsolete-lease cleanup across every historical lease row. Reuse a clean candidate or acquire a fresh sandbox through normal selection. Preserve exact same-run reattachment, workspace-less execution and ordinary task admission checks. - Preserve the newer prepared remote-workspace writer proof for native and legacy runs. Share its binding check between single-source recovery and one batched allocation read. - Keep persisted recovery-action IDs when constructing continuation source checks. Synthetic sources cannot grant snapshot receipt authority. - Permit one audited maintenance adoption for the first exhausted source-verification attempt. Require an unadmitted canonical saved board Retry, current user authority, unchanged assignment and latest source run. - Keep all company, source, allocation, workspace writer, controller and physical finalization ownership checks. The public read-only inspector keeps its strict policy check. - Pin the exact source for file maintenance. Preserve the previous generation and reuse the existing bounded recovery worker. Create no provider turn or new user request. - Restore the warm policy in the same transaction as verified native copyback completion. A failed write or changed settlement keeps a recovery obligation. - When local merge metadata is missing, settle the exact verified snapshot while keeping its unfinished allocation retained. Deliver the saved Retry through normal fresh isolation and attach the verified files. Keep the accepted result as history. - Require native copyback proof before reopening an accepted result's original workspace finalizer. - Validate snapshot receipts through one shared boundary for warm, retained and ephemeral sources. Bind the receipt to the current generation's operation IDs, company, issue, run, recovery action, lease and provider allocation. - Retire fixture input before removing recovery proof, and use the same configured heartbeat for HTTP and worker dispatch. Keep the exact catalog refusal and no-provider-work assertions. - Document the recovery contract in technical documentation. Leave capability maps unchanged for this bug fix. ## Verification - Candidate-selection RED: all six clean-candidate and fresh-allocation controls fail on unchanged `f54e7baf538` because a pending export aborts the whole acquisition. GREEN: the focused suite passes 15/15 cases after candidate filtering. Both provider paths preserve the protected lease and never resume or destroy its allocation. Obsolete fingerprints cannot send that allocation to cleanup. Historical-row fencing, modern native/legacy writers, exact same-run reuse, workspace-less execution and the single-read allocation-history check remain covered. - The existing reusable-runtime selection cases passed 40/40. Driver/capability contract suites passed 5/5. Reusable service controls passed 2/2. After merging current master, the combined lease/provider suites pass 61 cases and the recovery integration selection passes 36 cases, including the upstream inherited-session and resolved-interruption assertions. This gives 97 passing targeted cases on the final source. A duplicate test-app declaration from the automatic merge was removed while retaining the upstream assertions. - The source-history repair has meaningful red/green evidence: three valid retired-handoff cases could not complete under the old blanket history-row rejection. Settlement now uses the same full source inspector as adoption. It accepts exact retired handoffs and still rejects a predecessor that becomes active after export. The 26 focused history, rollback, snapshot and ambiguity cases passed before this last merge. - Server typecheck passes on the final merged source. Module boundaries and `git diff --check` pass. Full local repository tests and a successful current-head full build are not claimed. Current-head CI is complete on `0ef974d76483e11fb0b0304bcb05bbd3b56e2ef9`: both required gates pass, with 54 successful checks, three expected skips, one neutral Paperclip review check and a successful security status. [Full CI evidence](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41904339370). Greptile reviewed that exact head at 5/5 with no actionable findings. Its check completed successfully. [Ponytail also reviewed the exact head at 5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17916#issuecomment-6640083408). No review threads remain unresolved, and the branch is mergeable. - Earlier local broad runs exposed a dropped recovery-action ID in the merged source projection and deferred test input being revisited after its records were removed. Both were repaired. Later local disk exhaustion caused manifest and saved-file reserve failures; generated caches were removed only from these checkouts. The affected saved-file control passed unchanged after cleanup. The original logs are retained. No disk reserve or timeout was lowered. - On the prior head, the first [full CI attempt](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41899038530) received simultaneous runner shutdowns. Four jobs were cancelled, and two late jobs have lost-runner annotations with unavailable logs. The Runner job had five earlier ACPX failures whose full assertion report was lost on interruption. Their cause remains unproven. Identical Runner source passed the [#19004 control](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41898305521/job/126814429725), including all seven enabled tests in that file. - That attempt's [browser shard](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41899038530/job/126817404595) returned to the exact saved task URL, but its conversation was still loading at the unchanged heading deadline. The [artifact](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41899038530/artifacts/13358840931) is retained. All five Cloud-auth cases passed locally on the unchanged head and in the [same-source CI control](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41898305521/job/126814429966). The delay remains unexplained. One rerun of failed/interrupted jobs was submitted after the workflow completed. This new source revision requires fresh CI. - The earlier [original-head workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40552228175) passed all 48 jobs, and prior head `f54e7baf538` received Greptile 5/5. These results do not establish readiness for the new head. The earlier Superagent scan was neutral after a pinned-base checkout failure; its external analysis remains unverified. - These tests use real PostgreSQL and controlled provider boundaries. Hosted rollout and original-task acceptance remain unverified. ## Risks - Maintenance can resume and stop the exact sandbox for file export. It cannot admit a provider turn, choose another allocation or bypass normal continuation gates. - A saved Retry alone is insufficient. A changed source, newer run, active writer, competing lease, lost user authority or previous adoption keeps the hold. - Policy restoration can fail. Completion and restoration now commit together, so normal recovery remains responsible for a retry. - Snapshot preservation cannot repair missing local merge metadata. Its old allocation remains explicitly retained. A snapshot receipt grants no permission to reuse or destroy that allocation, or to replay the accepted result. - The allocation check uses one projected join per candidate over the existing provider lease index. It adds no polling timer or recurring scan. A fresh fallback can create another sandbox while the unfinished source remains retained; it grants no authority to execute a provider turn. - This change does not establish the cause of a prior provider failure or prove that any specific hosted sandbox still contains its original files. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, for the original change. OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`), xhigh reasoning, for the merge and integration repairs. Both used repository tools and PostgreSQL verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 14:47:42 -08:00
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5	0173110ee3	fix(native): point failed run attachments at the docs (#19052 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - When a later run cannot attach to a native session, the run fails, and a later run may start a new provider thread. > - The first failure is easy to miss. In 5 of 11 cases on a test deployment, the run ended with a different error before it reported the attach failure. > - People and agents who diagnose a failed run look at its log and events, so that is where an explanation is useful. > - This pull request adds a pointer there at the first failure, with the real cause and a link to the docs. > - The benefit is that a failed attach explains itself, and readers can find the open follow-up in #19047. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19047. I searched open and closed pull requests and issues for `prior_attach_failed` and related terms, and found no duplicate. ## What Changed - Log: `executeHeartbeatRuntime` writes one stderr line to the run log when a same-run retry follows a failed `run.attach`. - Events: `heartbeat.ts` adds a `lifecycle` event with the same message and the code `native_run_attach_failed`, using the stored redacted failure. - Helper: `describeFailedAttachment` extracts the real cause and returns nothing for other failures. - Docs: "Session settlement after a run" in `doc/execution-semantics.md` now explains this and links #19047. - Link target: the pointer links to the repo docs and not the issue. Agents read these logs, and anyone can comment on a public issue. - Unchanged: error codes and retry behavior. ## Verification - `cd server && pnpm exec vitest run src/services/heartbeat/runtime-execution.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/remote-warm-session-recovery.test.ts`: 57 passed. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p .` in `server` reports no errors. - New tests cover the log line at the throw site, and the helper's output for attach failures and other failures. - Not covered: the new event in `heartbeat.ts` has no test of its own. It uses the tested helper. - Not verified: I have not confirmed that agents read this log when they diagnose a failure. - Not run locally: the full test suite. CI provides that coverage. ## Risks - Failure text in the log: when the failure has no structured message, the log line includes the whole failure string. It passes through the run log's identity redaction. The event uses the stored failure that the executor already redacted. - Link stability: the link depends on the docs heading. Renaming that heading would break the anchor but not the page link. - Migrations: this change has no migration. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be reworked. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), through Claude Code, with tool use and code execution. A human directed the design and approved the scope. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-04 14:36:17 -08:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	86afc2048b	fix(native): admit follow-ups after an owner finished in this process (#19071 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native Runner per-turn sessions in a remote sandbox keep one conversation across task turns. > - Before a follow-up starts a new Runner, it must prove that the previous owner's controller stopped. #18846 added a retirement path for this proof. > - The native controller runs inside the webserver process. Thus the owner's recorded controller PID is the PID of the webserver. > - When the same server process serves the follow-up, that PID is alive and has the same start time. The proof reads this as "controller still alive" and refuses. The follow-up then fails with `runner_state_identity_mismatch: prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`. This continues until a deploy replaces the process. > - This pull request uses the controller's per-process boot identity to recognize that this process recorded the owner. The process then uses its own session registry to prove that the owner's controller stopped. > - The benefit is that follow-ups on a long-lived server no longer fail before provider work. All other ownership fences stay as they are. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18846 (retirement of recovered per-turn owners). Refs #19061 (names the refused retirement proof). The two changes are compatible. Whichever merges second needs a small rebase in `retireFinishedPerTurnRunnerdOwner`. What happened? On a test deployment, 17 runs over 14 tasks failed before provider work with `runner_state_identity_mismatch: prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`. Each run had a per-turn lifecycle in a Daytona sandbox and got a new sandbox. In each inspected case, the previous run on the task succeeded and committed its result. Its run profile had no `nativeControllerRecovery` pointer. Without that pointer, `evaluateNativeControllerTakeover` is not lease-fenced, so it uses process liveness. The recorded `controllerPid` is `process.pid` of the webserver. When the follow-up is served in the same process, `process.kill(pid, 0)` succeeds and the start time matches. The result is `controller_still_alive`, and retirement refuses. Expected behavior A committed owner that this server process finished, released, and no longer runs is proven stopped. The follow-up then starts a new Runner, as #18846 intended. Steps to reproduce 1. Seed a per-turn sandbox owner that committed its result and released its lease. Record this process's controller identity (`currentNativeControllerIdentity()`) as the owner. 2. Keep the owner's file-backed journal in the local session root, and remove the database recovery pointer. 3. Admit a follow-up in a new sandbox. 4. Before this change, admission fails with `prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`. Paperclip version or commit Observed on `e107a75755`. The same code is on `master`. ## What Changed - `native-restart-recovery.ts`: add `isCurrentNativeControllerProcess(owner)`. It is true only when the owner's `controllerBootId` is this process's per-start boot UUID and `controllerPid === process.pid`. A recycled PID or another container never matches. - `retireFinishedPerTurnRunnerdOwner`: when the owner was finished in this process and no `activeNativeSessions` or `nativeSessionStartups` entry exists for its run, treat its controller as stopped. Otherwise, use `evaluateNativeControllerTakeover` as before. The same in-process check runs again just before the archive. - All other retirement proofs are unchanged: committed result, released lease, no recovery state, settled journal, answered tool inputs, quarantine copies, and new or replacement sandbox. - `native-recovered-owner-followup.test.ts`: the seed helper accepts the owner's controller identity. New cases cover same-process admission (with and without a recovery pointer), an exited legacy controller, another live controller, and the same PID with a different boot identity. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describe the same-process stopped-controller proof. ## Verification - Failure before the change: with only the new tests applied, `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-recovered-owner-followup.test.ts` fails 1 case: "admits a follow-up in the process that finished the owner: local journal only". It expected admission and received `runner_state_identity_mismatch: prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`, the exact error from the deployment. The safety cases already passed on the old code. - After the change: the same file passes 27 of 27. - Adjacent suites: `native-recovered-owner-followup`, `remote-warm-session-recovery`, `native-runner-restart-recovery.integration`, `native-restart-recovery`, `native-session-resume`: 210 passed, 20 skipped. - `native-session-executor.test.ts`: 1128 passed. - `tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json`: no errors. - Not verified live: this change has not run on a deployment. Run data came from read-only API calls only. No recovery was done on the deployment. ## Risks - Second executor. The new proof applies only when this exact process recorded the owner, and this process has no session or startup for that run. The database proofs still require a committed result and a released lease. Another live controller, or the same PID with a different boot identity, still holds the owner. Tests cover both cases. - Scope. The change applies only to the per-turn retirement path. The warm remote recovery path (`inspectRemoteWarmSessionRecovery`) is not changed. Warm handoff in the same process uses the in-memory idle owner instead. - Hypothesis limit. The deployment API does not expose finalization rows. Thus I inferred that the same process served each follow-up from the evidence: no recovery pointer, a local journal present, and no other failing proof. The local reproduction gives the exact error. #19061 can confirm the refused fence on the deployment. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic. Agentic coding in Claude Code with tool use (shell, browser for read-only staging API reads, code execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-04 16:29:25 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	4740d251b7	fix(onboarding): retain plan approval across follow-up decisions (#19043 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Onboarding asks a person to approve a saved plan before execution tasks can start. > - A person can then approve a separate proposal for the first execution step. > - The creation gate checks only that latest card for the plan target. It loses the earlier approval of the unchanged plan. > - Decomposition and native context also omit checkbox plan confirmations. > - This pull request validates the latest execution decision and the latest plan decision together. > - The benefit is that approved work can start while human, revision, and proposal gates remain effective. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17914, #18160, and #18283. The related-PR search found no duplicate repair. What happened? After a person accepted a checkbox plan card and a later execution confirmation, native task creation and REST child creation returned 403. Accepted-plan decomposition returned 422 because its lookup recognized only standard confirmations. Native task context returned no accepted plan for the checkbox decision. Expected behavior The latest execution proposal can use an independently approved, unchanged plan. A pending or rejected latest proposal must still stop execution. The current plan must retain valid human approval of its exact revision. Steps to reproduce 1. Save a plan on a server-created onboarding task. 2. Create a revision-bound checkbox confirmation and accept it as a human. 3. Create and accept a separate, untargeted confirmation for the first execution task. 4. Create the child through the native tool or REST API. 5. Separately, try accepted-plan decomposition or read native task context after step 2. Paperclip version or commit The workspace's registered hosted release is Core `09c05c55050fede448196637cbaa543a154da76e`. The three regressions also failed against local source `3cdb367369f29692b81cf19b514a2abdba90734f`. Deployment mode Hosted native Runner with ACPX Claude. Local regression proof uses actual PostgreSQL, authenticated HTTP routes, native tool authority, and synthetic task data on macOS arm64. No customer data or credentials are in the fixtures. ## What Changed - Validate the newest ordinary proposal and the newest plan proposal separately. Keep the existing human-card and conversational provenance checks for each. - Require the accepted plan target to match the current document and revision. A newer pending, rejected, invalid, or foreign plan decision cannot fall back to an older approval. - Share persisted confirmation parsing across admission, decomposition, and native context. Validate checkbox selections against the saved options and limits. - Return `acceptedPlan.approvedOptions` with the user's saved selected IDs and option text on later wakes, including revision-pinned context. Keep unchecked defaults out of scope. - Add behavioral and safety regressions. Document the approval rule. ## Verification - Three behavioral regressions failed before the repair: child creation returned 403, decomposition returned 422, and native context returned `acceptedPlan: null`. All three now pass. - Two scope-retention regressions failed before the review fix: native context omitted the selected option after a later approval, with and without a pinned plan revision. Both now pass. Unchecked defaults stay excluded. - Current admission, native-tool, and accepted-confirmation replay suites: 131 tests passed. Existing first-task completion safety checks: 17 passed, including the atomic decision recheck. - Safety cases cover missing and rejected plan approval, agent-only decisions, foreign source runs, changed revisions, invalid checkbox selections, newer pending or rejected proposals, and task-creation replay. - Full repository `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed locally on final head `7c0e8ab784`. - [Full final-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41911580531) passed: all Vitest shards, Runner checks, eight browser E2E shards, build, release registry, and canary dry run. The required `verify` and `e2e` aggregates passed. Storybook checks were skipped for this backend change; the file-selection job was skipped because full CI ran. - Earlier local typecheck attempts exposed Copilot verification during build preparation, stale declarations across the rebase, and two test-fixture typing errors. The assets were verified, declarations rebuilt, and fixtures corrected before the complete final-head pass. - Full local Vitest attempts were interrupted for the rebase and review repair. The duplicate final local run was stopped after full Linux CI passed. No complete macOS Vitest-suite pass is claimed. - A fresh Claude-provider acceptance run remains unverified: the local Claude account is signed out and no Anthropic API credential is available. The actual native tool and HTTP paths are verified with real PostgreSQL persistence. This PR does not deploy or recover the reported production task. - Greptile: 5/5 on `7c0e8ab784`, with the review thread resolved. ## Risks A later acceptance must not revive rejected or changed scope. Admission validates both current decisions and retains source, company, human provenance, and document locks. The extra plan-proposal lookup is bounded and limited to accepted, untargeted first-task proposals. Ordinary delegation adds no new proof lookup. The native context adds an optional `approvedOptions` projection. Revision-pinned context now performs the existing scoped approval read to recover that selection. No database schema, request, provider, or background worker changes are included. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, exact model `gpt-6.1-sol`, max reasoning effort, with repository, shell, browser, and GitHub tools. The current session metadata confirms the model and effort. The context window size is not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 15:24:58 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	8a0e7ab511	fix(runner): preserve ordinary append for unscoped governed terminals (#19044 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work done by AI agents. > - A native turn can park on a saved human question or approval. > - Its terminal event can return a committed receipt before observers finish. > - That option requires an explicit turn ID at the event port. > - The protocol also permits events without a turn ID. > - The runner requested the option for those events, which the port rejected. > - This change keeps those events on the ordinary append path. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #19025. What happened? The native governed-wait observation can accept a schema-valid `item.completed` without a turn ID. If the later terminal also has no turn ID, the runner compares two absent IDs and requests `deferPostCommitObservers`. The event port rejects that option. The run then fails with `governed_wait_provider_terminal_unproven`. Expected behavior Only a terminal with an explicit turn ID can request the early receipt. An unscoped terminal must keep the ordinary append behavior and await its observers. The event port must retain its turn identity check. Steps to reproduce 1. Create a pending human-only interaction from the run. 2. Pass a schema-valid completed tool event without a turn ID through the real governed-wait observation. 3. Supply an interrupted terminal without a turn ID during the cancellation drain. 4. Run the actual native runtime with the PostgreSQL event port. The parent code rejects the deferral request and reports a failed terminal. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on `4ea53f9eb5a24de10db3dfda18456132987c4af8`. The follow-up was identified by a review published after #19025 merged. No observed provider emission or original-task recovery is claimed. I checked current master and related PRs before this correction. Deployment mode Built from source. The regression uses real PostgreSQL and a deterministic provider boundary; it makes no model call. ## What Changed - Require a truthy terminal turn ID before the runner requests deferred observers. - Keep ordinary append behavior, the port identity check and all timeouts unchanged. - Exercise the production governed-wait observation with a persisted pending interaction and the real event port. - Retain exact-turn observer and checkpoint controls. Add a direct rejection control for unscoped deferral. - Document that unscoped terminals await their observers. ## Verification - First meaningful red: the actual observation, native runtime and PostgreSQL port fail on the unmodified parent runtime. The new case reports `NativeProviderTerminalFailure` in 143ms; this is not a setup or deadline failure. - Focused regression and authority controls: 12 passed, 69 filtered. Full runtime suite: 203 passed. Full PostgreSQL port and timing suites: 84 passed. - The tests leave the human-only interaction pending with continuation policy `none`, accept one result, and start only one turn. Existing scope, invalid evidence, checkpoint, abort, duplicate and restart controls remain. - Exact candidate: `8840ea2c9c308e5a60423e67fb3612d24029ba84`. Repository-wide `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build` and `pnpm check:module-boundaries` passed on this exact head. `pnpm test:run` is still in progress and is not reported as passing. Current-head CI passed: 55 success, 3 skipped and 1 neutral, including required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`. Greptile and Ponytail both reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no blocking findings. The native review was source-only. No unresolved review threads remain. - No UI, database schema, agent permission or mapped user entry point changes. No deployment, live retry or provider replay was performed. ## Risks Unscoped terminals retain the existing observer wait and can still fail if it exceeds the existing drain deadline. They do not gain an early receipt. The change does not supply a missing turn ID or weaken source, company, run, session, cancellation or transaction checks. A PRP terminal is not physical-stop or accounting-completion proof. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with code and shell tools. The host does not expose the reasoning mode or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 15:07:06 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	22735cfcea	fix(native): preserve governed terminal receipts during observer settlement (#19025 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work done by AI agents. > - A native turn can yield to a saved human question or approval. > - The provider must stop, and its terminal event must be saved. > - The old drain waits for both the event transaction and its later observers. > - A slow observer can make a saved terminal look unproved. > - This change separates the committed receipt from owned observer work. > - Checkpoint and result acceptance still wait for that work to settle. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A native governed wait can fail with `governed_wait_provider_terminal_unproven` after its exact interrupted terminal is already in PostgreSQL. The event port waits for postcommit accounting, output and projection callbacks before it returns the receipt. Those callbacks can cross the provider drain deadline. What did you expect to happen? A committed terminal proves the event transaction. Its observers remain separate work. A checkpoint or result must not be accepted until those observers settle. A pending human-only question must keep its audience and continuation policy. Steps to reproduce Run the real PostgreSQL control-plane regression. Commit a same-turn interrupted terminal. Hold its postcommit observer beyond the existing provider drain. The parent code reports an unproved provider terminal. The fixed code retains the committed receipt and joins the observer before checkpoint or result acceptance. No overlapping repair was found in the current master or open-PR search. Related [#18977](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18977) covers final conversation-response selection. It does not change this receipt boundary. The source reproduction is consistent with the observed failure. The exact hosted provider code is unavailable, so it does not prove that every observed failure used this branch. ## What Changed - Add an explicit terminal-only option to the internal event port. Ordinary appends keep their existing behavior. - Return that receipt only after the normal transaction and company, agent, run, session, source and revocation checks. - Retain the full observer promise. Join it before checkpoint and result writes. Keep its original rejection and observe it after an aborted join. - Reuse the existing provider drain and checkpoint deadlines. Preserve duplicate and restart replay without another model turn. - Document the receipt and duplicate-observer replay boundaries. Keep human-only and no-continuation cards unchanged. - Assert the actual Codex facade requests deferral only for its interrupted terminal. Isolate empty skill inventory in monitor-only process fixtures while retaining their real scheduler, lifecycle, selection snapshot and three-second deadline. ## Verification - Meaningful parent red: actual native runtime and real PostgreSQL event port. The terminal row commits, but a held observer causes `NativeProviderTerminalFailure` with `governed_wait_provider_terminal_unproven`. - Current candidate `0db24ae74ee42fdf92035d8407fc095e9f73cc6a`: full runtime suite, 203 passed. Real PostgreSQL control-plane, timing and monitor suites, 103 passed. Runner TypeScript and full layered server typechecks passed on the unchanged candidate source tree. The controls cover uncommitted and foreign evidence, explicit false and failed terminals, held and rejecting observers, abort and controller revocation, duplicate receipts, and new-port recovery. The real pending human-only card stays unanswered with continuation policy `none`. Recovery does not call `startTurn` again. - `pnpm -r typecheck`, the production server build (including the real Runner release binary), module boundaries and vendor dependency verification passed on `6d75`; the follow-up changes only tests and documentation. Diff checks pass on the current candidate. The prior `399ad3dc2b` repository-wide `test:run` was stopped as obsolete during the general-server phase after preserving its progress (exit 130, incomplete); its repository build was not reached. Its six completed chat shards passed 1,904 cases, but this is prior-head evidence and not a full-suite pass. Full current-head CI is required before merge. - CI attempt 1 on `6d75` failed one real three-second monitor-settlement assertion; the aggregate verify gate consequently failed. Other jobs passed. The actual CI merge tree was `3037bf6db162da3b0a9172046360401f8449ebc5` (`6d75` into `89703c3`). An unchanged full-file replay reproduced three timeouts. Original-deadline inspection found the legacy process still preparing; local phase timing measured cold skill inventory at 6.629 seconds. The original CI did not retain that phase detail, so its exact subcause remains unproved. The fixture correction supplies empty skill entries for these skill-free process tests and still invokes the selection-snapshot callback. It preserves all assertions and the three-second deadline, with no new drain wait. All 21 cases pass; deliberately restoring the old blocked-status rejection still fails the real blocked-check case with 409. No CI retry was issued. - The prior current-head native review was 4/5 with no production correctness finding. Its requested direct facade-options assertion and duplicate-observer wording correction are included. Current-head CI is green (55 success, 3 skipped), including required verify and E2E; current-head Greptile is 5/5 with no actionable findings. The old native advisory remains tied to `6d75`, and its requested findings are addressed. No new native assessment is claimed or required by protection. - The first draft broke three existing transaction-start timing controls. The no-debt path now keeps the original synchronous start, and all three pass. Two draft type errors were corrected. A further real-PG red found an extra default-append assertion after commit. Removing it restores the original committed receipt after a late abort; the same aborted signal still cannot write a checkpoint or result. Original setup and assertion failures remain in private verification receipts. - Normal merge of current master `3a2249dd5768313f04b2aa3860dfd363492eda16` has no conflicts. The affected production source blobs did not change in that baseline merge. - Local proof uses Node 24.22.2 on Darwin arm64, a real PostgreSQL instance and deterministic provider-boundary fixtures. It makes no model call. No deployed replay or original-task recovery is claimed. ## Risks Deferred observers must remain owned. A missed join could accept incomplete accounting or output. A rejected or stalled observer must prevent acceptance, and an abort must prevent late checkpoint/result writes. The tests exercise these boundaries. The port keeps the existing best-effort trace-publication handling. This change does not turn a PRP terminal into physical-stop or accounting-completion proof. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with code and shell tools. The host does not expose the reasoning mode or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 14:11:03 -06:00
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5	e107a75755	fix(native): decide session settlement from live state (#18992 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native Runner sessions keep one provider conversation across task turns, so a later run attaches to a session that an earlier run settled. > - Three gates decide if a session is settled: Core's journal check, the Runner's attach check, and the Runner's drain of provider messages after a turn. > - Each gate kept a list of harmless events and refused anything else. Every new harmless event became an outage. > - An example: Codex replays a settled turn's usage on `thread/resume`, so `run.attach` refused every session that restarted after its idle timeout. > - Events after a terminal describe the past. Refusing the session cannot undo them, and it hides them. > - This pull request asks a different question: is anything live or waiting right now? Past events are recorded and no longer block. > - The benefit is that harmless events stop breaking session continuity, with no event list for Core and the Runner to keep in step. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No issue exists. I searched open and closed pull requests and issues for `run.attach requires a settled Codex provider session` and `prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`. Related work: #18890 added one more accepted event to Core's list. This change replaces that list. #18991 handles late usage and is independent of this change. What happened? On a test deployment, 11 runs failed in 21 days when `run.attach` refused with `requires a settled Codex provider session with no pending events`. In all 11, the four pending events were two startup audit events, `session.resumed`, and a `codex_resume_usage_snapshot` diagnostic. The diagnostic is what the attach check refused. The retry then failed with `prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate` in 6 of them, which hid the first failure. Expected behavior A session with nothing live or waiting accepts the next run. If attachment fails, the run reports the real cause. Steps to reproduce 1. Finish a Codex turn on a native Runner session. 2. Wait for the idle timeout so that the provider process stops. 3. Start the next run. Codex replays the usage for the settled turn on `thread/resume`. 4. The attach fails. `durable_backend_attaches_after_a_settled_resume_usage_snapshot` reproduces this on the unfixed code. Paperclip version or commit Observed on `8fd917aedf`. The same check is on `master` before this change. Deployment mode Cloud deployment, with a native Runner in a plugin sandbox environment. ## What Changed - Runner attach: `attach_run` refuses only for live or waiting state: no thread, a closed session, a session that needs reconciliation, an active or ambiguous turn, an active goal, a pending tool call, or an unanswered provider request. The error now names the reason. - Pending events: they no longer block attachment. They stay in the retained queue, and the Runner commits them under the prior authority before it rotates. `session.resumed` is still discarded because it is superseded. - Runner drain: `drain_completed_turn_tail_for_warm_attachment` no longer needs a list of known messages. It still fails on a message that names another turn, on `turn/started`, on a provider request, and on a process exit. - Core: `isSettledRemoteWarmControlState` accepts any authenticated event after the terminal unless it starts work (`turn.started`, `turn.accepted`, `run.attached`, `tool.execution.started`, `semantic_tool.input`, `runtime_request.created`), or a goal snapshot or update shows an active goal or work in progress. All identity, source and protocol checks are unchanged. - Visibility: the next run's log names the event types that were recorded after the previous run finished. - Real cause: a same-run retry after a failed attachment now fails with `prior_attach_failed: <original failure>`, instead of `prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`. - Docs: added "Session settlement after a run" to `doc/execution-semantics.md`. ## Verification - `cd packages/paperclip-runner/runner && cargo test --locked -p paperclip-runner-core --test codex_provider`: 102 passed, 2 ignored. `--lib`: 478 passed, 2 ignored. `--test durable_recovery`: 3 passed. - Failure before the fix: `durable_backend_attaches_after_a_settled_resume_usage_snapshot` failed on the unfixed code with the same error as production. - `cd server && pnpm exec vitest run src/services/native-runtime/remote-warm-session-recovery.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts -t "settled remote warm control evidence\|recovers a blocked\|automatically recovers only a proven settled local session\|retained\|warm"`: 476 passed, 680 skipped by the filter. - `pnpm exec vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-resume.test.ts`: 57 passed. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p .` in `server` reports no errors. - Real data, read-only: I decrypted the 11 failed runs' stored events on a test deployment and printed only event types, field names, and thread and turn IDs. All 11 show the same four events. - Audit of live state: I read the Runner's provider state and request tracking to build the attach check. It is a code audit. I have not proved that every kind of live work sets a flag. The Runner holds active turns, ambiguous starts, tool calls and provider requests in state today. - Not covered: the wiring that throws `prior_attach_failed` has unit coverage for its message only, not an end-to-end test. - Review: Greptile Apex scored 4/5, then 5/5 at the current head. - Not run locally: the full test suite. CI provides that coverage. - Not verified live: no live run has used this change. ## Risks - Fail-open for unknown live work: an event type that starts work, but is not in the short list and sets no state flag, would now pass. This is the main tradeoff. The previous list failed closed, but it caused real outages. - More events reach the journal after a terminal. The usage replay diagnostic is now delivered rather than refused. These events are informational, and they are named in the next run's log. - A failed attachment is not retried on the same run. Some refusals could clear on their own, such as a turn that finishes, and some attach errors are not about live work, such as a failed provider restore. The run now reports the cause, and it needs another run to continue. On a test deployment, the next successful run after each failure used a new provider thread and a new execution workspace. A later change could add same-run retry. - Rollout order: deploy Core before the Runner. An older Core would refuse the new events that a new Runner commits after a terminal. - Migrations: this change has no migration. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be reworked. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), through Claude Code, with tool use and code execution. A human directed the design and approved the scope. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-04 12:04:29 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip	d180ad8c77	fix(heartbeat): retry chat execution authorization contention (#19017 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A task Retry must use the current task and chat authority. > - The request and queue paths already retain a Retry through brief lock contention. > - Execution checks that authority twice, including after native input preparation. > - A busy task row or chat identity could fail the admitted run at either check. > - This pull request retries only the rolled-back authorization transaction. > - The same run can proceed after the lock clears. The final dispatch gate still rejects changed ownership. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A failed chat task can accept a normal Retry and then fail during execution setup when another PostgreSQL transaction holds the task row or chat identity lock. The late check can fail after native input and workspace preparation. The exception can then enter the workspace preservation path. Expected behavior Keep the same admitted run and its frozen input. Retry a recognized, rolled-back authorization conflict within the existing bound. Recheck current authority before each attempt. Reject Stop, paused agents, revoked chat access, or a changed task owner before the execution callback. Steps to reproduce 1. Admit a normal failed-chat task Retry with the existing PostgreSQL fixture. 2. On a second connection, hold the task row or the chat identity advisory lock when execution authorization starts. 3. Release the lock after the real authorizer reports contention. 4. Observe that the original code fails the run before the authorized callback. Repeat at the late native check after input preparation. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on master `039e0dad2c51c80251e1302a19c5566e039c357a`. The branch is rebased on `8f06bd4e1`. Deployment mode Source checkout with real PostgreSQL and the local HTTP Retry route. Provider and chat transport responses use controlled test fixtures. Refs: #18895 and #18896 cover request and queue admission. This change covers execution authorization. #18898 and #18989 cover predecessor cleanup, a separate boundary. The roadmap and public PR search show no duplicate execution-authorization repair. ## What Changed - Recognize the existing typed chat-presentation contention error in the bounded admission retry helper. Keep its existing PostgreSQL lock-unavailable handling. - Use that helper at both execution authorization checks. Each attempt checks cancellation and the applicable legacy controller lease, then opens a fresh transaction. The loop contains no provider or workspace callback. - Include failed-chat Retry in the existing final dispatch ownership gate. This preserves current task ownership and native recovery owner checks after a delay. - Add real PostgreSQL contention, late prepared-input, Stop, pause, revocation, owner replacement, native completion, and ordinary legacy completion controls. Document the retry and dispatch boundaries. ## Verification - The unchanged base failed real task-row and chat-identity contention cases. A separate late native case failed after frozen input preparation. A safety control then proved that a replaced task owner could still reach the backend; the final dispatch gate fixes that path. - All 11 PostgreSQL cases and all four helper controls pass. The tests keep exact frozen model and trust input, reject changed authority, and do not replay a provider callback. - A real local HTTP Retry reaches the native executor, one controlled provider turn, one accepted result, a committed finalizer, and one published chat reply. Reprocessing the canonical request does not start another turn. - A separate real HTTP ordinary legacy Retry runs one controlled adapter callback, completes its task through the normal service, and does not replay the canonical request. - Independent review found no material issue in the two production files. It checked transaction scope, lock order, current ownership, native lease expiry, and import cycles. - The full workspace typecheck and full `pnpm build` pass on this head. Full `pnpm test:run` passed all 1,916 chat integration cases. Its broader server group reported the existing workspace-runtime case `returns a bounded structured conflict and exposes only same-company workspace references` as failed after 46 ms. The unchanged focused case and the complete 179-case file both pass on rerun. The active broad run was then stopped for this finite handoff; its child exited 130 and the command exited 1. The detailed assertion was buffered and was not retained, so its exact cause remains unknown. This is a partial local run, not a full local pass; later local groups did not run. All three CI chat shards pass. [Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no findings](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19017#issuecomment-6638521119). - Retained setup and fixture failures are not counted as product regressions or passes. An incomplete copied Copilot runtime failed the first typecheck; the supported installer repaired that isolated dependency, then typecheck passed. Early acceptance fixtures used a wrong publication field or did not complete their task; the final controls use the real field and completion service. - The first CI run failed [workspace shard 1](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41885475363/job/126769239992) on child-server startup and a five-second dense ZIP test deadline. [Server shard 2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41885475363/job/126769239908) failed an existing local runtime readiness probe. All 18 cases in the two CLI files and the runtime case then passed unchanged locally on this head. The CLI files also match an earlier independently verified head byte for byte. One failed-job rerun was requested. Its [server job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41885475363/job/126777070120) was cancelled after the runner received a shutdown signal. It produced no test verdict. After that workflow ended, only the interrupted server job and its required dependents were rescheduled once. The [complete workspace rerun passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41885475363/job/126777070125). The [rescheduled server job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41885475363/job/126781960353) and its aggregate passed. The [complete current-head workflow is green](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41885475363). All required current-head CI and security gates pass, including the Ready-triggered scans; three conditional checks are skipped. The complete unchanged idle-history file also passes all 75 cases locally. No timeout or assertion changed; all attempts remain part of this result. - These local controls do not claim hosted-provider or Linux sandbox acceptance. The original task-row failure did not retain a SQLSTATE; the PostgreSQL reproduction proves the local gap without assigning that original cause. ## Risks - The existing bound allows 50 backoffs of 100 ms. It limits backoff time, not total database or lease wall time. - Native ownership is checked at the final dispatch gate. The per-attempt controller lease assertion applies to legacy execution. - A persistent lock or changed authority still fails closed. Unknown prior provider effects and accepted work retain their existing guards. - No migration or model, account, trust, credential, or permission policy change is included. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, code editing, and PostgreSQL verification. The host does not expose the exact serving model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass within the stated scope: relevant regression and acceptance controls, and the complete chat, idle-history, and workspace-runtime files. The broad local run remains partial as recorded above. - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 13:07:50 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	3a2249dd57	fix(runner): retry proven ingress bootstrap failures (#18981 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native execution must retain its admitted model and execution authority during recovery. > - A sandbox provider can reject Runner endpoint acquisition before the Runner gets a credential. > - The old error path loses the structured HTTP status and leaves that startup failure ambiguous. > - A zero counter in an old checkpoint cannot prove that no credential was issued. > - This pull request adds a versioned producer proof and carries closed provider status through the existing RPC. > - A proved transient startup failure uses the existing retry budget. A terminal proved-unused run can settle its accounting. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18018 and #18934. Those changes restore existing checkpoints and ready retained environments. This change covers endpoint acquisition before Runner dispatch. A search of related public PRs found no duplicate implementation. What happened? A provider HTTP 502 during Runner endpoint acquisition becomes an untyped worker error. Native recovery treats it as ambiguous and stops without retrying. The run's native usage receipt also stays pending after startup ends without model work. Expected behavior Retry a structured transient endpoint failure only when the complete current controller checkpoint proves that this exact run never issued a Runner credential. Preserve authentication, configuration, Stop, ownership and provider-progress gates. Settle zero usage only under the existing terminal accounting owner. Steps to reproduce 1. Use the controlled endpoint in the Daytona ingress integration test to return HTTP 502. 2. Register the actual native Runner driver and persist its bootstrap journal through the encrypted checkpoint writer. 3. Observe the old terminal ambiguous disposition instead of bounded startup recovery. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on the pre-change master source. The original regression used the production native driver, a real HTTP fault, a real durable control plane and local Postgres. The new contract additionally tests the pinned Daytona SDK and real worker RPC. ## What Changed - The controller owns a v2 persisted state with retained origin and credential history. Current readers still accept v1. Older writers reject v2. Restore and checkpoint decoding do not add missing history. - The proof validates the complete bootstrap journal, all six identity fields and every delivery, credential and progress control. The server rechecks its fingerprint under the current controller claim before retry or accounting changes. - Daytona and the SDK carry a closed acquisition phase and HTTP status through the existing ingress RPC. Both public error wrappers omit response bodies and causes, including Pino cause serialization. - Only structured HTTP 429 or 5xx ingress failures can use the existing three-attempt startup budget. HTTP 401/403, configuration and unknown errors do not gain retry authority. - A terminal proved-unused run wakes existing accounting and records zero provider work. It does not create a semantic result, prove physical termination or release an unknown process/workspace hold. - The normal automatic second attempt rechecks its exact claim, frozen execution and matching complete local/encrypted journal before admitting absent remote Runner state. It keeps the original pending bootstrap command IDs. A proved unused Codex home can rematerialize sealed skills. Full raw local state is checked before streaming-event or policy projection. - Normal saved-state readers and the existing E2E journal evidence matcher accept the closed v1/v2 set. The separate legacy no-launch witness is unchanged. Technical docs describe the contracts. ## Verification Current head: `cd38f70409cdb8664e14bfbf4efa208f468a0419` (final delta adds only fixture artifact preparation). Production files are unchanged from the independently reviewed `93c8a33520` source. Full repository typecheck and build passed at `96417acb58`; the affected server typecheck also passes after the final two-line fixture delta. Focused protocol, raw-proof, real retry, SDK and RPC acceptance pass on this source. Earlier broad suite counts are listed with their limits below: - Durable Runner protocol: 187 tests. - Native executor, driver, startup/accounting and redaction: 1,211 tests, including real Postgres and encrypted checkpoint persistence. - Normal saved-state restore/projection compatibility: 21 focused cases. - SDK: 209 tests. - Standalone Daytona: 544 tests; 8 opt-in live tests skipped. - Explicit standalone `pnpm -C packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona exec vitest run --config vitest.sdk-ingress.config.ts`: 6 cases with real pinned SDK 0.203.0 and worker RPC ingress acceptance. These include lookup 502/401/403/400, private-preview 502 after successful lookup/refresh, missing credentials and private-response exclusion. - E2E journal evidence: 4 cases across both supported formats, with wrong ownership, missing stimulus and unknown-schema controls. - The exact historical controller source rejects a new v2 checkpoint at decode and restore. A v1 control is accepted. This verifies the downgrade fence with the actual older parser. - Startup controls cover issued and pruned credentials, old/truncated journals, provider progress, exhausted retry accounting, and checkpoint/Stop/controller-claim races. Race cases retain the current execution and pending usage. - New exact admission controls: 19 cases through encrypted persistence and cold restore. They cover current/stale/expired claims, Stop, pause, model/trust/account changes, prior progress, issued/pruned credentials, adopted/old/truncated state, local/canonical fingerprint mismatch, hidden delivery, unsupported work and company scope. Two additional red/green cases prove that raw local stream progress and missing event policy are rejected before lossy checkpoint projection. No case mutates run, claim, result or accounting state. - Actual native executor, scheduler and Rust Runner retry: 2 cases. Codex uses its fake app server. OpenCode uses the real proxy and fake OpenCode HTTP server with the frozen DeepSeek model and allow permission configuration. Each path launches no Runner on attempt 1, starts one Runner and provider on attempt 2, reuses both original command IDs, commits one accepted result, validates the persisted local workspace, records nonzero synthetic native usage and settles accounting once. No zero-work accounting flag survives. The controlled SDK and protocol tests use local source, isolated PostgreSQL, a private HTTPS preview and fake provider servers on macOS arm64 with Node 24.22.2. They create no hosted sandbox and make no model call. The root workspace intentionally omits standalone provider dependencies; the explicit SDK target fails if its pinned dependency is absent and has no conditional skip. They do not qualify hosted rollout or repair an old unmarked checkpoint. The first full local typecheck found missing checkout SDK links from an install with scripts disabled; the repository link helper repaired that setup. Current-head Linux CI typecheck and build pass. Independent final review checked 12 source scopes and six raw-proof controls with no remaining finding. Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 with no unresolved thread. The full Runner CI suite found two older control-peer test doubles missing the new proof method. Both now return no proof, with all 27 permission, ordering and cancellation assertions retained and passing. The new Cargo-dependent native retry suite uses the existing Rust-cached CI lane. All 39 lane coverage controls pass and prove complete, duplicate-free suite coverage. The first full test run stopped at an admitted chat Retry polling failure. CI also found a stale retained-allocation fixture, now repaired on master by #18984, and a canceled runner job. A real SDK suite initially relied on a dependency absent from the root workspace; the explicit standalone target now owns that acceptance. The separate Product E2E support run had 12 failures in four untouched files. All 12 reproduce on the original clean base with independent dependencies, compiled base source and verified workspace resolution. These concern workflow expectations, cleanup timeout arguments, a profile snapshot and operating receipts. They are not passing acceptance. The later full local repository test command stopped at a 15-second timeout in the unchanged GitHub pre-allocation retry `controller` case. That exact case passed in isolation with unchanged assertions. The broad Runner run initially omitted `test:typescript:prep` and lacked debug fake-provider binaries. Required preparation then passed 370 + 44 package contract cases (11 skipped); the prepared full package run reported 4,932 passed, 9 failed and 13 skipped. All failed families then passed with unchanged assertions in isolation: 8 ACPX controller tests and 2 credential controls. The paired original-base ACPX control also passed. The full-run failures remain recorded; they are not passing full-suite evidence. The first Rust-cached native CI run found a missing generated OpenCode proxy in a fresh checkout. The fixture now runs the existing verified provider-entrypoint builder. Removing the generated proxy reproduces the exact ENOENT before the fix; both real retry cases pass after the fix from the same absent-artifact state. All current-head CI gates pass, including the aggregate verification check. Linux native CI passes all 10 suites: 177 tests pass and 14 opt-in cases skip. Both real provider retry cases pass. The full Runner package passes 297 suites and 4,950 tests, with 1 suite and 10 tests skipped. The CLI workspace groups pass 4,762 and 286 tests. The first CI attempt had Runner shutdowns in the Runner package, Canary and three general server jobs. One unchanged CLI shard also hit child-server startup and dense ZIP deadlines. Both CLI files passed unchanged in isolation: 18 tests. One bounded rerun of unsuccessful jobs and their dependents passed. The original failures remain recorded. ## Risks - Older controllers reject newly written v2 state on downgrade. Current controllers retain v1 restore support, but old or unmarked state cannot gain this new proof. - An older plugin that omits structured ingress evidence remains held. The server and provider must use the new producer contract for this recovery path. The Docker `cloud` target builds the SDK, server/Runner and standalone Daytona producer from one source tree. The default `production` target does not build the standalone producer. Hosted rollout must confirm the new image and active image-owned plugin worker; a registry version alone does not prove its source. An npm-installed producer needs an explicit matching artifact upgrade. - This prevents future proved startup failures. It does not release historical accounting based on an old checkpoint, change retry budgets, replace a model or weaken sandbox isolation. - Zero model usage is separate from process termination, saved files and resource release. Those owners keep their existing gates. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with tool use and code execution. This runtime does not expose the exact backend model ID or context window to the agent. Read-only independent agents reviewed checkpoint compatibility and SDK/RPC error boundaries. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (affected suites; full local run limits are recorded above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 12:16:51 -06:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	edb9d29942	fix(recovery): preserve Retry authority and reopen cross-task cases (#18997 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Tasks keep execution identity and saved workspace files separate from control-plane updates. > - A scanner can have permission to reopen a case while its run cannot restore that case's files. > - Retry can also follow a preparation failure that has no recovery-action record. > - Both paths can accept valid work but leave the target unable to run. > - This change restores files under the target executor and saves admitted Retry authority on the canonical receipt. > - Existing workspace, user, source and successor checks still apply. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? An authorized agent updates another closed task. The route tries to restore the target workspace under the caller's run identity and returns `403 Task workspace run identity is unavailable`. A separate failure occurs when a normal board Retry follows a pre-provider preparation failure. Admission has no recovery-action row on which to save continuation authority. Dispatch then fails with `continuation_user_authorization_missing`. Expected behavior Accept the authorized task update. Restore its terminal workspace when the target's admitted executor starts. An admitted Retry must retain its exact dispatch authority even when the predecessor has no recovery-action record. Steps to reproduce 1. Complete a task with an isolated workspace. From a different running task, use an authorized comment or PATCH with `resume: true` on that closed task. 2. Separately, fail native preparation before provider work starts, with no recovery-action row. Submit board Retry, admit its successor, and build the execution continuation. 3. Before this change, the first path returns 403 and the second rejects its admitted authority. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced against `e968131efa7e63d321f3bcca8d47a62513c2efb4`. Rebased onto `afbc5a885b5`. Deployment mode Server-managed native task execution. Tests use real PostgreSQL and temporary workspace files. Related PRs: #16927 covers terminal workspace races. #17916 retains exact native export sources. Neither covers these route and Retry receipt failures. A GitHub search found no duplicate. ROADMAP.md was checked; this is a recovery bug fix. ## What Changed - Defer workspace restoration only for authorized cross-task comments and updates from a live run. Checkout keeps its existing workspace identity checks. - Restore the target's selected terminal workspace under its own admitted run. Preserve its saved files and existing source checks. Leave manually archived workspaces unchanged. - Store server-created continuation authority on the canonical admitted Retry receipt when no source recovery-action record exists. Existing action records remain authoritative. Read the fallback only after matching the company, task, agent, user, source, generation and successor. - Add route and PostgreSQL regression tests. Document both paths. ## Verification - Red: both cross-task route tests returned the observed 403 before the route fix. - Red: the target executor could not reuse its archived terminal workspace before the restoration fix. - Red: an admitted preparation Retry with no recovery-action row failed with `continuation_user_authorization_missing` before the receipt fix. - Green: 419 recovery and continuation tests pass, plus 183 focused route, environment and Retry tests. The assembled heartbeat test starts the agent in the same terminal worktree and verifies both its unpushed commit and uncommitted file bytes. It fails before the restoration fix. - Negative cases reject wrong Retry runs, users, source runs, generations, unadmitted receipts and missing authority. The original failed run stays unchanged. Workspace tests verify saved file bytes. - Full `pnpm build`, `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm check:module-boundaries` and `git diff --check` pass. - The full suite found an existing assembled chat authority regression: clearing a recovery-action record could be bypassed by the new fallback. The fix now writes the fallback only when that source has no action record. That assembled regression passes with the original test unchanged. - Full `pnpm test:run` is running again. Its first attempt also hit an unrelated ancestor skill-root lookup for a missing Slack skill. The rerun uses a temporary untracked link to the repository's own bundled skills. This link is excluded from the PR. Full-suite completion and hosted CI are pending. - Hosted CI has multiple runner interruptions. E2e shard 1/8, server shards 3/12, 8/12 and 12/12, and workspaces-a shard 1/2 show runner shutdown signals. E2e shard 5/8 and server shards 1/12 and 2/12 have GitHub annotations reporting lost runner communication; their logs return 404. The `ci / verify` assertion failed because the general-test matrix was cancelled. GitHub rejected job and failed-workflow reruns while this workflow is still running. Rerun the interrupted checks after it settles. - Greptile reviewed exact head `a1e3929aedb1ee3bfcd001f4ebb1510106bf4070` at 2026-11-04 17:37 UTC: 5/5, with no new blocking findings and no unresolved review threads. ## Risks - A deferred workspace restore can still fail at target admission. The run keeps the existing workspace failure path; this change does not bypass file recovery or provider stop checks. - Retry receipts now store server-created authority. Existing action receipts remain valid. No schema migration is required. - Local regression tests establish the software behavior. The new revision has not been deployed to a hosted instance. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through the Codex harness in T3 Code, with xhigh reasoning, repository inspection, tool use and code execution. The context-window size is not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 11:55:16 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	6364fa7327	fix(heartbeat): wait for retry predecessor cleanup (#18989 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and preserves its task ownership. > - Heartbeat admission controls when a queued run can start. > - A failed run can still own workspace saving and environment cleanup. > - Automatic recovery can transfer the task execution lock to its queued retry before that cleanup finishes. > - The old queue check then sees the retry itself and misses the predecessor's remaining work. > - This pull request checks the exact retry predecessor before claiming the queued run. > - Existing cleanup notifications can then resume that same run through normal admission. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18898 and #18691. The first repair covers canonical connected-task retries with a native source. The second covers live remote workspace writers. This change covers ordinary automatic continuation when the predecessor failed before native runtime selection. The search found no open repair for that path. What happened? A preparation failure saved a terminal legacy run row while its remote workspace save and environment cleanup were still active. Generic continuation created one queued successor and moved the task execution lock to it. The queue checked that current lock but did not check the successor's predecessor. The new run started and failed at the existing unfinished-writer guard. Expected behavior Keep that same successor queued until its exact predecessor finishes execution and cleanup. Check company, agent and task identity before using retry provenance as a wait condition. Preserve Stop, reassignment, failed cleanup and independent recovery gates. Steps to reproduce 1. Save a failed legacy preparation run with an active environment lease. 2. Queue its ordinary automatic continuation and bind the task execution lock to the successor. 3. Claim the queued run before the predecessor finishes cleanup. 4. The old code starts the successor. The fixed code retains it in the queue. 5. Commit successful cleanup through the existing cleanup owner. The ordinary dispatcher starts that same run once. Paperclip version or commit The causal regression fails on master `86814c6550f52e99ede150a883bdc773cbb540e3`. Deployment mode Source checkout on macOS arm64 with disposable PostgreSQL, the assembled heartbeat service and the production work coordinator. The adapter boundary is controlled. No hosted provider replay or deployment is claimed. ## What Changed - Check the current task execution owner and the retry's exact predecessor under the existing task claim lock. - Use the saved native task binding, ordinary task binding and historical context fallback in that order. Ignore unrelated retry provenance. - Reuse the existing live-executor and pending-cleanup checks. Reuse committed cleanup notifications and the existing dispatcher. - Add real PostgreSQL claim controls and assembled cleanup-event acceptance. Keep the original source failure, saved files and current task ownership intact. - Document the queued predecessor-cleanup rule. ## Verification - RED: the unchanged queue claimed the successor and wrote a new controller lease while its legacy predecessor retained an active remote environment lease. The regression expected the successor to remain queued. - GREEN: the same regression passes after the change. The complete queue suite passes all 71 tests. - The assembled heartbeat suite passes all six tests. The added cases cover one continuation after committed cleanup, saved-file reuse, final task lock release, board Stop, reassignment and failed cleanup. - Scope controls cover a deleted source after scan, another company, another task, another agent, canonical native task binding and the existing current-owner hold. A failed cleanup and a still-live local executor retain the wait. - Node 24.19.0 and pnpm 9.15.4. Module boundaries and `git diff --check` pass. - Initial fixture attempts failed on database constraints and observer timing. The final fixtures use valid immutable bindings, the board Stop attribution and a completed real dispatcher call after reading the exact committed lease state. Production ownership guards were retained throughout. - Full low-memory repository typecheck passed at `5cddb49322`. The sync to master `04a24f4e06` adds only the independent retained-allocation test fixture from #18984; production code is unchanged. - Full `pnpm build` passes on current head `c7c2bcf08ffd05be5ce714683ae1dcfe6f5b49f1`. - The post-sync run executes all 80 behavior assertions successfully across the queue, assembled cleanup and updated upstream retention suites. Its queue `afterAll` then exceeds the existing 30-second database shutdown hook. That failed suite result is retained. The controlled post-build queue rerun passes all 71 tests with normal teardown. The earlier shutdown cause remains undetermined. Its owned queue-test PostgreSQL process has exited. The separate local default `pnpm test:run` was intentionally stopped after full unfiltered CI passed on the exact head. Four local chat partitions completed before that stop; this is not a local full-suite pass. The verified owned process group and its PostgreSQL fixture have exited. Logs and retained fixture data remain available. The timeout has not been increased. - Full unfiltered CI passes on current head `c7c2bcf08ffd05be5ce714683ae1dcfe6f5b49f1`: all 12 server shards, all six internal chat partitions, all nine serialized server shards, the workspace groups, native Runner lanes, typecheck, build and browser E2E. Both required [ci / verify](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41866478617/job/126711606613) and [ci / e2e](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41866478617/job/126711263146) pass. The file selector is skipped, so this is the full CI test matrix. The head has 55 successful checks and three expected skipped checks. The ready-for-review contributor trust and security scan also pass. - Current-head Greptile is 5/5, its check is successful, and no inline review threads remain. The ordinary review check also passes. No merge, deployment or original task retry was performed. ## Risks - A predecessor with unfinished cleanup keeps its successor queued. Its existing cleanup owner remains responsible for settlement. - A task claim reads at most one additional predecessor row. A matching source also uses the existing ownership and cleanup queries. The change adds no timer, schema, credential, provider or model policy. - A committed cleanup signal only requests normal admission. Current ownership and independent execution gates still apply. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code editing, tool use and PostgreSQL verification. The session does not expose a more specific serving model ID or context-window limit. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — focused suites pass; the separate local full-suite attempt is explicitly incomplete above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 11:16:54 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	aaea05e158	fix(native): preserve backups when completed warm sessions retire (#18986 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native Runner keeps provider history when a warm session ends. > - Object storage must preserve that history before the sandbox is released. > - A completed turn releases its live controller lease. > - The backup owner lookup rejects that released lease and stops the next task preparation. > - This pull request uses the existing completed-run checkpoint fence for backup storage. > - The next turn can prepare after the previous provider state is saved. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #18932, #18011, #18984. What happened? A warm Codex turn completed and kept its provider session alive. The next turn stopped during preparation with `native_harness_storage_owner_missing`. The backup lookup required a live lease after normal completion had released it. Expected behavior Save the completed session under its retained controller generation and committed result. Keep the existing owner and successor checks. Do not start another provider turn during the save. Steps to reproduce 1. Run a warm native session with object-backed provider backups. 2. Commit the first turn and release its controller lease. 3. Start the next task preparation and retire the previous session. 4. Observe the backup owner error before provider work starts. Paperclip version or commit The regression is present at `86814c6550f52e99ede150a883bdc773cbb540e3`. Deployment mode A hosted server with a remote native Runner and S3 storage. ## What Changed - Accept a released backup owner only when its exact controller record has a committed result. - Reuse the checkpoint owner policy for same-controller preparation and native successors. - Recheck the controller generation, committed result, and released state after upload. - Preserve live-owner rejection and the rule that a late upload cannot replace a newer conversation backup. - Add real PostgreSQL storage and restore regressions. Document the completed-run backup rule. ## Verification - On 2026-11-04, two new regressions failed on the unchanged source with `native_harness_storage_owner_missing`. These covered an idle completed session and a same-controller preparing successor. - After the fix, 54 selected tests passed: 30 durable backup tests and 24 existing early-retirement checkpoint tests. After the fixture-only upstream sync, all 58 selected storage, checkpoint, process, and affected fixture cases passed again. - The storage cases use real PostgreSQL, encrypted archives, object transfer, and restoration. They cover invalid completion evidence, foreign or expired successors, active predecessors, changed generations, changes during upload, and newer backup publication. - Command: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/native-runtime/native-harness-backup-storage.integration.test.ts server/src/services/native-runtime/native-runner-restart-recovery.integration.test.ts -t 'released\|backup\|early retirement\|durably retires an accepted warm Runner'`. - An independent source review found no outstanding code issue. - Full repository typecheck passed with `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs` before the upstream fixture-only sync. Production source is unchanged across that sync. - An assembled process probe passed with the Runner binary built from this head and a fake Codex protocol peer. It started real processes, committed a result, released the source lease, claimed the next controller, and completed the source stop, drain, and suspend commands. It recorded one provider turn start and kept the task bound to its successor. - Command: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/native-runtime/native-runner-restart-recovery.integration.test.ts -t 'durably retires an accepted warm Runner'`. - CI exposed the old allocation-readiness test setup in three cases. The branch now includes the merged #18984 fixture correction. The same three cases passed locally after that sync. - An earlier CI test shard was cancelled after its runner received a shutdown signal. Its log was retained before one rerun. Another old-head shard reported failure with no retrievable job log or annotations; its cause remains unknown. Current-head CI must pass independently. - Local `pnpm build` passed at this head. All 1,904 chat cases passed across the supported local shards; the earlier shards used byte-identical source before the fixture-only sync. The interrupted default command is retained and is not reported as a pass. - The local bulk server run had separate enrollment acknowledgment, environment-run status, monitor-settle, idle-history teardown, and repository-rehome failures. In isolation, idle-history passed all 75 tests and the unchanged repository cases passed with their original limits (4.9s large files, 6.4s refs). The remaining four local failures reproduced on unchanged master `04a24f4e06` under the same environment and limits. Their causes remain unproven. Logs and the baseline comparison were retained; the local full suite is not claimed as passed. - Current-head CI first hit the unchanged repository-rehome large-file case's 15s timeout. The same isolated case passed in 4.9s. After source/call-path comparison, one bounded failed-shard retry passed all 115 executed suites; no assertion or timeout was changed. The original timeout remains recorded. - Local verification uses macOS 26.5.2 arm64, Node 26.4.0, pnpm 9.15.4, PostgreSQL 18.1, and Cargo 1.97.1. The current tested head is `622f69f76ff68c71eacdcbcbc6ab4d4c6eb83bf9`. - The full unfiltered [PR workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41868587974) passed at `622f69f76ff68c71eacdcbcbc6ab4d4c6eb83bf9`: all 12 general server, 3 chat, 9 serialized, workspace, native Runner, build/typecheck, E2E, and final verify lanes. The file selector was skipped, so this was the complete fallback matrix. - Greptile reports 5/5 on this exact head with no open review threads. Disposable local test processes were cleaned up and the source tree is clean. - The real hosted Codex and S3 workflow has not been rerun because the local verification environment has no remote provider credentials. The original task remains unchanged. ## Risks The main risk is a stale controller publishing provider history after a new owner starts. Both storage transactions keep the company, run, boot, and generation fence. A released owner must keep its committed result. Existing successor checks and the newer-backup publication guard remain in force. The live checkpoint writer still requires a non-null lease. No migration or API change is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks; separate baseline broad-suite failures are disclosed above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 11:15:58 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	afbc5a885b	fix(workspaces): save partial and shallow Git checkouts offline (#18990 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their workspaces. > - A completed remote run must save its files before finalization can release its source. > - A shallow Git mirror uses upload-pack and can omit objects that exist only in the index. > - A filtered source can also fail when that mirror requests blobs the source never downloaded. > - Fetching missing history is not required to preserve an existing partial checkout. > - This change saves the available object stores and their existing shallow, sparse, and promisor state. > - The benefit is an offline save that preserves accepted work and remains readable by the existing archive reader. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #16727, #18705, and #18935. These changes cover managed clones, streaming capture, and safe diagnostics. This change repairs Git snapshot contents. What happened? Remote workspace capture invokes a mirror clone before it saves the archive. A shallow filtered sparse checkout with a missing promised blob fails that clone and surfaces `remote_workspace_operation_failed`. An ordinary shallow checkout can also lose an index-only object during the mirror transfer. Expected behavior Capture preserves the objects already available in the checkout, including staged work. It preserves partial, shallow, and sparse semantics without remote hydration. Corrupt or unsupported state must keep its source and receive no successful save receipt. Steps to reproduce 1. Create a real Git repository with two paths and commit history. 2. Clone it with `--filter=blob:none --depth=1 --sparse`, then select one path. 3. Stage a change, edit it again, and add an untracked file. 4. Remove access to the original repository and capture the workspace. 5. The base capture fails before transfer. The changed capture restores the available work after the original source is removed. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on `86814c655`. The same transport/archive sources are present in `76e43852a`. ## What Changed - Preserve existing object files for shallow and partial repositories, including their original promisor pack markers. - Preserve shallow boundaries and the selected sparse settings and patterns. - Validate available object contents with full Git fsck. Reject unknown corruption instead of creating new promises. - Deny Git network protocols during capture. Keep the ordinary mirror's explicit local file transport. - Exclude ambient Git location, index, object-store, config, and template overrides. Disable templates for init and clone. - Keep the existing archive format, source fences, path guards, credential allowlist, and failure retention. - Add real command and reader regressions for full, shallow, filtered, sparse, corrupt, and unsupported repositories. ## Verification - Red: the compiled Node 24 transport completed helper installation, then failed capture with the same generic operation error and no transfer. Dirty source bytes remained intact. - Red: the new full/shallow/partial transport-to-reader cases exposed both filtered upload-pack failure and a missing staged-only object. Independent review then reproduced accepted corrupt object bytes and ambient template config/hook copying. - Green: all 110 transport/archive cases pass after those repairs. They cover staged, dirty, and untracked work; ordinary and forged-promisor corruption; malformed filters; alternate stores; unsafe links; credential redaction; and template isolation. An initial linked-worktree config regression was fixed before this complete passing run. - A compiled new capture restored through both the unchanged earlier reader and the new reader after source removal. HEAD, status, work bytes, sparse/shallow state, and the same missing promised object were preserved. Full Git fsck passed. No remote protocol was permitted. - Full repository `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass at `91ca00a8327216def91303e19940e92ffe07c08f`. The build stamp names that exact head. - The [complete current-head CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41865961403/attempts/2) is green: all 58 checks are terminal with no failure or pending check. Three expected skips and one neutral review remain those states. - Preserve the [first CI attempt](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41865961403/attempts/1): one browser case reached its 5-second heading deadline while the conversation pane was loading; a chat worker reported shutdown; another browser worker lost communication and its log blob was absent. A failed-job-only retry passed at the same source head. No test deadline, assertion, or source change was made for that retry. - The complete local `pnpm test:run` passed all 1,904 chat cases across six partitions. Its later general-server phase timed out two unchanged tool-access cases at 15 seconds. That known-red command was stopped before completion. Both cases then passed unchanged in a fresh isolated process. The original timeout cause remains unknown; this is not a full local-suite pass. - [Greptile reports 5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18990#issuecomment-6635931211) at the current head with no actionable finding. The product review's loose-object cost advisory was [answered with local measurements and resolved](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18990#discussion_r4470261833). There are no unresolved review threads. - Original service acceptance remains unverified. Recorded checkout text is mechanism-compatible narrative evidence, not proof of its physical Git state or original failure cause. This PR includes no deployment or additional live recovery. ## Risks - Full object validation and copying available metadata use CPU and temporary space proportional to the local object store. - The offline path rejects alternate object stores and unsupported partial filters. Such sources remain protected. - Promised objects remain missing. Later work still needs ordinary repository access to request them. - There is no archive format or schema change. Existing readers restore standard Git files, and existing full snapshots remain covered. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, shell execution, and local verification. The host does not expose a more specific serving model ID or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 10:52:39 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	86814c6550	fix(recovery): ready retained sandboxes before preparation (#18934 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work performed by AI agents. > - Restart recovery must preserve each run's workspace and execution owner. > - A retained remote lease can refer to an archived sandbox. > - The reattachment path returned that lease without making it ready. > - A short project-authentication command then had to start the sandbox. > - This PR resumes and verifies the exact retained allocation before preparation. > - Recovery keeps the recorded workspace and preserves saved work if resume fails. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A native run resumed after a controller restart. Its saved sandbox had been archived. Reattachment returned its lease without a provider lifecycle resume. The next project-authentication probe tried to start that sandbox with its 15-second command budget. The start failed before the probe could inspect project settings. The heartbeat reported a configuration conflict and stopped work. What did you expect to happen? Make the exact retained sandbox ready through the existing bounded lifecycle operation. Verify its allocation before running short preparation commands. Keep the validated lease and recorded working directory. Never acquire a replacement in this path. Steps to reproduce Hold the provider's exact-lease resume pending and call remote reattachment for an active ephemeral lease. Before this change, acquisition returns immediately. The added tests hold acquisition until resume completes and reject missing, changed or expired allocation evidence. Provider compatibility cases retain the recorded workspace when resume omits directory metadata or returns the allocation root. Deployment mode Native Runner in a sandbox with a retained workspace and managed AI connection. The observed provider was Daytona. Refs #18910, which restores selection of retries using current remote workspace storage. This change repairs the next preparation boundary. Related #17421 and #18559 change project-file inspection; they do not make retained sandbox leases ready. ## What Changed - Resume the exact validated sandbox lease before returning it to preparation. - Require the receipt to confirm the original provider allocation without reporting expiration. - Keep the original database lease and recorded directory. Resume metadata can describe the allocation root. - Pass the existing typed resume-directory input through the runtime facade. - Preserve retained E2B sandboxes when resume timeout setup or workspace inspection fails. Keep new-allocation cleanup and explicit release/destroy behavior. - Preserve plugin-task reattachment and lease identity checks. - Update the Stop-accounting fixture to confirm exact-allocation resume before cleanup, with its budget, ownership and no-paid-work assertions intact. - Document the ordering and add readiness, receipt, failure and ownership regressions. ## Verification - Red: seven initial retained-lease cases failed before the readiness change. Two receipt-compatibility cases and four E2B preservation cases failed before their fixes. - Green: all four runtime, workspace-preparation, heartbeat-recovery and orchestrator suites pass: 442 tests. - The Stop-accounting CI failure reproduced locally. All five integration cases pass with the exact-allocation resume fixture. - All 22 E2B tests, the standalone plugin typecheck and its build pass. - 13 Daytona safety cases pass, including recorded directories, allocation sentinel rejection, saved-file reads and no replacement creation. The SDK boundary is simulated; the saved-file case uses real files and a POSIX shell. - These focused checks cover 482 passing cases. - Full recursive typecheck, final server typecheck and full workspace build pass on macOS arm64 with Node 24.22.2 and PostgreSQL 18.1. - Greptile is 5/5 on head `32f915a475275680bcf2a2aa43ae0c72f4e4b1db`. Both original review threads are resolved. - All current-head CI gates pass. The check rollup has 54 successful checks, three skipped checks and one neutral check. - The separate Paperclip Review check remains queued. Its public response says work is paused and the request is saved. The review task is waiting for saved-file recovery, so no Paperclip assessment of this head is claimed. The branch-required gate has passed. - A read-only deployed trace showed an archived sandbox start fail at the short probe's 15-second deadline. Actual provider reattachment with this revision has not been exercised. Live recovery remains unverified until rollout. ## Risks Recovery now makes one bounded lifecycle call before short preparation commands. A missing resume capability or a missing, changed or expired allocation receipt holds recovery. The existing runtime and provider retain allocation and sentinel verification. The path does not acquire, release, replace or reseed the lease. Warm providers can return their existing allocation. E2B retains the existing sandbox if resume setup fails; explicit lifecycle cleanup still owns its removal. No background polling, credential-policy change, migration, workflow change or lockfile change is added. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, source inspection, tool use and code execution. The exact backend snapshot and context window were not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 09:04:13 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	84e9c8f364	fix(retry): wait for admitted source cleanup before dispatch (#18898 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connected-task Retry keeps the original request and its current authority. > - One durable Retry can already own a queued successor. > - The old native environment can still have pending cleanup before that successor starts. > - The task execution lock points to the successor, so the old cleanup can escape the queue claim check. > - Dispatch then refuses the source state and fails the new run before provider work. > - This pull request keeps that same run queued and wakes dispatch when cleanup changes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18845, #18853, #18860, #18877, #18882 and #18932. These repairs cover preservation binding, interrupted preparation, old native ownership, manual native holds or other setup guards. This change covers an already admitted connected-task Retry whose native predecessor still owes cleanup. It uses the shared cleanup predicate so the manual-hold repair remains with its existing owner. Search found no duplicate queued-source cleanup repair. What happened? A board Retry saved its exact chat request and admitted one queued successor. The source lease was still pending cleanup when that successor reached dispatch. A retained stop receipt did not settle the full cleanup contract. The queue checked the task's current execution owner, which was already the successor. The native authorization guard then rejected the predecessor state and failed the new run before provider dispatch. Expected behavior Keep the same canonical Retry and queued run while the exact source cleanup is pending. After authoritative settlement, submit that run through normal dispatch once. Do not infer safe execution from a stop-and-retain receipt alone. Steps to reproduce 1. Retry an authorized connected request from a failed native run. 2. Admit one successor while capacity keeps it queued. 3. Leave or restore the source lease to pending cleanup with a matching retained stop receipt. 4. Release capacity and resume the ordinary queue. 5. The old claim path starts the successor and the native source guard refuses it. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced against master at `f77499283270d2e966aabd58493f9d35c6bbdf5f`. Deployment mode The regression uses the real HTTP route, chat authorization, queue claims, disposable PostgreSQL and the production work coordinator on macOS arm64. A controlled adapter supplies the final result. No hosted provider replay or deployment is claimed. ## What Changed - Validate the exact canonical Retry, chat action, company, task, agent, source and successor before testing source cleanup. - Keep the successor queued under the existing issue claim lock while the shared cleanup predicate remains pending. - Wake only the scoped queued-dispatch worker after cleanup or exact workspace-owner release commits. Add no timer or background scan. - Verify pending cleanup at intake, later cleanup invalidation, one final execution, idempotency, Stop, changed input, unknown stop receipts, a different live controller and signed sandbox absence followed by owner release. - Document the queued-wait contract. No schema, endpoint, credential, model or provider policy changes are required. - Align five native preparation acceptance fixtures with the existing workspace publication contract. Use the real reservation and publication owner. Retain a raw-root refusal case with no provider launch and preserved files. ## Verification - Latest master sync at `e26cad76b8f20ba823d702ed60e7b7294f8f5a7c` includes master `396b7fc62a0a4b1d8aadbda8221c05879d54177c`. The shared test helper preserves #18944's canonical retained-directory default, the real publisher for the five fresh-workspace cases, and the explicit raw-root refusal. Independent remerge review found no dropped upstream behavior, guard or assertion. - The latest head passes the focused six cases, all 580 complete workspace/continuation tests, all 38 selected HTTP Retry cases, fresh full recursive Node 24.22.2 types and full build. No affected tests skipped. An initial cached test-layer attempt read old budget declarations; regenerating them resolved all seven errors without test/mock or production-export changes. - All current-head CI is green at `e26cad76b8f20ba823d702ed60e7b7294f8f5a7c`, including required [ci / verify](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41846304017/job/126636751314) and [ci / e2e](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41846304017/job/126636638086). Greptile and Paperclip Review both rate this exact head 5/5, with no findings or open review threads. - Master sync at `3e4f266c2da172a84afd0b9cb4a91ea3b95f3c0d` merges master `b891e69bd23d6dab8ce536569e15bc4a7a31c35c`. The only conflicts were adjacent queue imports and two HTTP Retry test matrices. Both imports and both complete matrices remain unchanged. Independent review found no relaxed guard or assertion. - Node 24.22.2 and pnpm 9.15.4: all 38 selected real HTTP Retry cases, 194 queue/cleanup/finalizer cases, module boundaries, recursive types and build pass at `3e4f266c2da172a84afd0b9cb4a91ea3b95f3c0d`. - That sync head's [server check](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41838741852/job/126604742761) failed five native acceptance cases in CI and locally with `remote_workspace_published_path_invalid`. The test fixture supplied a raw directory instead of a fresh publisher-generated workspace. The guard from #18932 remains unchanged. The same five cases passed earlier Linux CI before that guard was present. - The test-only alignment at `dcdee1bb6c2e2e6dd494382499d17c23a3ce71a8` obtains the saved authority, path and run reference from real `reserveRemoteWorkspace` and `prepareRemoteWorkspace`. All five original cases and a raw-root no-launch/no-result/files-preserved control pass. Their native result, file, catalog and single-execution assertions remain intact. An initial setup attempt was refused for a noncanonical allocation root; the fixture now resolves that owned root before publication. - At previous fixture head `dcdee1bb6c2e2e6dd494382499d17c23a3ce71a8`, the generated server test-layer typecheck passed. All 580 tests in the complete workspace/continuation family pass, with no skips. That test-only commit left production files byte-identical to the sync head. - Previous published-head CI was green at `dcdee1bb6c2e2e6dd494382499d17c23a3ce71a8`, including required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`. The [Linux Node 24.22.2 server shard](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41842665765/job/126618334638) executed all five original acceptance cases and the new raw-root refusal case successfully. Its whole workspace recovery file passed all 245 tests. - Greptile reviewed previous published head `dcdee1bb6c2e2e6dd494382499d17c23a3ce71a8` at 5/5, with no findings or open review threads. No unchanged-job rerun was used for the reproduced sync-head failure. - Causal red: the real HTTP regression started and failed the successor at the native source-state guard while cleanup remained pending. A second red proved that signed sandbox absence followed by copyback-owner release lacked a queued-dispatch wake. - Green: seven HTTP/PostgreSQL cleanup cases, the exact confirmed-owner release notification control and seven existing retry lineage controls pass. The real coordinator resumes from committed cleanup or workspace-owner release, without a manual queue restart. One controlled adapter execution produces the result after settlement. - Earlier branch verification passed full repository `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, module boundaries and `git diff --check`. - The full stale-queue file control passed all 64 cases with unchanged observer/hook limits. The initial broader affected run had 192 passes and one non-assignee native-owner case miss its existing five-second adapter observer while already running with no error. The isolated case passed; the unchanged base passed all 64 cases but hit its existing 30-second teardown timeout. Those original results are retained. The new queue hint has no dispatch consumer in that fixture. - Earlier-head CI was green: 54 success, three skipped and two neutral checks at `6adb9f1ba682282c512d5e751ba2aa663f614ca2`. One chat job was cancelled by an external runner shutdown; its single unchanged-job rerun passed. No source was changed to obtain that result. - Greptile and Paperclip Review both rated earlier head `6adb9f1ba682282c512d5e751ba2aa663f614ca2` 5/5 with no findings or unresolved threads. These results do not qualify the master-sync head. - At initial verification, a complete local `pnpm test:run` was not repeated while the related setup repair's full local run was active. The full earlier-head CI suites passed. A full local suite has not been repeated for the mechanical master sync. Local verification uses the affected HTTP, producer, lineage and queue suites. No full local-suite pass is claimed. - The fresh clone's missing plugin SDK links were repaired with the repository's own postinstall helper before verification. The embedded PostgreSQL package's own symlink helper was also required. - No staging task was submitted again with this repair, and no deployment is claimed. ## Risks - A pending source cleanup can keep the queued run waiting. Its cleanup owner still owns reconciliation and its existing limits. - Stop, changed source, unknown termination and live ownership retain their existing authority checks. A cleanup notification grants no execution authority. - A new cleanup change after claim still faces the existing final dispatch guard. - Cleanup notifications can change dispatch timing in a running controller. The real coordinator cases verify commit-bound wakeups; the broader current queue-file control passed all 64 cases. The earlier loaded-run and baseline teardown failures are retained in verification. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code editing, tool use, PostgreSQL and browser verification. This session does not expose a more specific deployment model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 08:33:39 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	396b7fc62a	fix(runner): scope session diagnostics to the active run recorder (#18944 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and their work. > - The native executor can retain a transport between runs. > - Each run recorder has a shorter lifetime than that transport. > - The transport kept its first recorder after warm reuse and completion. > - A later close could write to the wrong run or a sealed object log. > - This change binds diagnostics to the active run epoch and retires that binding at execution exit. > - The existing recorder still owns accepted-byte draining and honest incomplete finalization. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A warm native transport retained the first run's diagnostic callback. Reusing the session for another run did not change that callback. A later idle close could append to a retired writer and emit a persistence warning. Expected behavior Active diagnostics belong to the current company, session and run. A retired transport callback must not use a completed recorder. Diagnostic metadata must not delay essential execution cleanup. Steps to reproduce Run the native warm-session regression with two sequential run owners. Close the retained transport after both runs finish. The original code calls the first recorder. The real completion regression also observes the resulting closed-writer warning after normal lease cleanup. This is a local source defect with behavioral red/green proof. Repeated hosted generic persistence warnings motivated the investigation, but their original exceptions were not retained. This PR does not claim to identify every such warning or repair an export failure. Related #18379 queues sanitized performance spans in heartbeat. It does not own transport diagnostic callback lifetime. ## What Changed - Bind transport diagnostics to an exact active company/session/run epoch, including warm reuse. - Activate a retained channel in the existing session-admission hook after identity validation and before attachment starts, including an attachment failure before `onSession`. - Forward active diagnostics synchronously. Detach their recorder at execution exit. Keep the original asynchronous metadata semantics. - Keep idle transport evidence inspectable. Log only a fixed category and trusted company/run identifiers to the process logger. - Preserve recorder-owned byte draining, redaction, source coverage and genuine persistence-failure warnings. - Cover actual native executor, completion and lease-close boundaries, including stalled local appends and exact object-log source/hash preservation. - Place the retained-workspace test fixture under the existing published-path contract after merging newer recovery tests from master. Production validation and native/catalog assertions remain unchanged. ## Verification - Current head: `c500e4933a85a4c453f66c872fa335108c661b15`. Normal master merges preserve upstream behavior. The one textual conflict was in the executor imports. - The first GitHub run tested merge tree `a4cb59448a3b5cc2047ac41c691720e6acec6e8d`, which included newer recovery tests from master. Five cases failed with `remote_workspace_published_path_invalid`. The same five failures reproduced on an identical local tree. The fixture now puts retained files under `.paperclip-workspaces/<workspaceId>` and keeps the target, lease and authority bound to that path. Production validation and the native-success/catalog-denial assertions are unchanged. - On unchanged `c500e493`, the full recovery file passed 244/244 tests. Existing cold-restore and occupied-root controls passed 4/4. Server typecheck, server production build, module boundaries and whitespace checks passed. An intermediate missing-import setup failure was corrected and is separate from the five-case behavioral red. - Before that fixture correction, local `f2fdaddb` passed 1,221 tests across the five diagnostic, executor, output, completion and object-store files. Recursive typecheck and full repository build also passed. Those results are tied to that earlier revision; [fresh current-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41842043248) must qualify the final merge. - Behavioral regressions cover the original closed-writer warning, warm A-to-B ownership, and an actual Runner attachment exception before `onSession`. The admission hook gives the attachment diagnostic to B and leaves A untouched. The attachment fixture uses synthetic event persistence and outer failure projection; it does not certify a real database terminal projection. - The tests preserve synchronous diagnostic admission and asynchronous metadata recording. A stalled append reaches the existing bounded finalization result with unknown size/hash. The normal object-log control preserves canonical bytes, SHA256 and complete source coverage after lease cleanup. - An initial local run had 37 PostgreSQL startup failures because the Darwin package lacked aliases to its included versioned libraries. Only isolated `node_modules` aliases were restored. No source or lockfile changed for this setup issue. A passing intermediate run crossed a source merge and is excluded from immutable-head proof. - An earlier combined test run passed 1,216 assertions but exited with a completion `afterAll` timeout. Its cause remains unproved. Later isolated 60/60 passes used the original timeout and do not erase that failure. An earlier repository-wide `pnpm test:run` was interrupted after its source became obsolete; it is not full-suite or current-head proof. Greptile reviewed the exact `c500e493` head at 5/5 with no open findings. Fresh CI must pass before merge. The native review is queued behind its separate saved-file recovery; no current-head native assessment is claimed. The provider execution loop is a fixture. These tests do not start a model or prove hosted recovery. Missing accounting receipts remain pending, not zero cost. Checkout-release invocation is observed; this is not a separate task-arbiter journey. The original native review published a valid finding before a separate workspace-export failure. The finding is fixed; this PR does not claim to fix that export failure or every hosted persistence warning. ## Risks Idle process logs intentionally omit raw provider text. The existing bounded transport evidence retains its own diagnostics. Accepted fs appends that do not settle retain the existing unknown-size/hash warning and cannot be certified complete. No new timeout, storage policy, schema or provider execution is added. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex assisted with diagnosis, implementation, tests and review. The exact context-window size is not exposed. Tool use and code execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run local tests and recorded passing checks, pending checks and unresolved failures above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will require all Paperclip CI gates to be green before merge - [x] I will require Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved findings before merge - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 08:04:52 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	b891e69bd2	fix(native): correct unread wake comments before completion (#18937 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Native agents report completion through a server-owned tool boundary. > - A truncated external-chat request requires a complete run-bound comment read. > - The terminal guard checks that receipt after the provider ends its turn. > - Early completion feedback omitted the same check and could accept an unread report. > - The provider then lost its chance to correct the report in the same turn. > - This pull request returns the existing read requirement through the completion tool before accepting the report. > - The final guard still protects the exact source and snapshot after provider settlement. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #16995 keeps run-scoped readers available to retained provider threads. #18913 preserves queued comment input. This change fixes a separate completion-feedback boundary. What happened? A native external-chat run could submit an accepted completion without reading all server-bound comments. The terminal guard then failed the run with `native_current_wake_comments_unread`. Early feedback also accepted partial, changed and foreign read receipts. The agent did not receive the required correction while it could still act in the same turn. Expected behavior The completion tool must reject the report with a `read_current_wake_comments` instruction and the cursor requirements. A complete current read must permit the corrected report in the same turn. The final snapshot check must remain effective. Steps to reproduce 1. Create a running native task with a truncated external-chat wake and exact accepted comment IDs. 2. Call completion feedback before reading the comments, or after only a partial or stale read. 3. Observe that the old code returns an accepted report instead of the read correction. ## What Changed - Check the existing run, company, task and agent binding before every completion-feedback acceptance return. - Reuse the authoritative current-wake reader and terminal receipt validator. - Share the two unchanged read-error codes from their owner across the validator, feedback and executor classification. - Convert only the two owned unread or changed-snapshot errors into a bounded tool correction. Other errors still propagate. - Keep the final validator, receipt parser, result persistence and admission policy unchanged. - Add real PostgreSQL regressions and an actual OpenCode MCP tool sequence with a controlled local provider process. - Document the early correction and final snapshot fence. ## Verification The source checkout uses Node 24.22.2 on macOS arm64 with a fresh owned embedded PostgreSQL database. Final published tip: `37bfb269432f86f98cab1a58c09b5519ed9477fd`. Its production code is commit `8c7297318c3a841fc1c72c846acfaabf58adabe9`; the last commit adapts three existing module mocks. The expanded affected group passes 1,284 cases with 35 existing opt-in skips. The skips require captured private-runner transition fixtures and a configured fresh database, which were not supplied. All nine real PostgreSQL/MCP cases execute and pass. Recursive typecheck and the full build pass for production commit `8c7297318c`; the final changed test layer also passes. - Untouched master `1a39dea9aa2bb9bea416439b0a574c788e88b9a0`: four causal failures. Unread, partial, changed and foreign complete receipts incorrectly receive accepted completion feedback. The ordinary inline-complete control passes. - Current source: all nine new cases pass. The actual authorized reader returns the full accepted comment. The same running task and run remain intact, with no replacement or accepted-result replay. - The OpenCode native backend sends a real MCP finish rejection to the controlled provider process. The process follows the returned reader instruction, reads every page, and resubmits finish. One provider turn produces one semantic result proposal. The terminal snapshot fence still rejects a later comment edit. - All 98 affected OpenCode driver and MCP bridge cases pass with the fixture-mode addition. - The first tool-sequence attempt failed on a fixture-only relative path before starting the provider. The test now uses its module URL. This setup failure is separate from the four causal failures. - The first recursive typecheck found missing local workspace links in the clone's excluded sandbox-provider directories. Existing dependency links were copied into the isolated clone. No lockfile or source change was made for this setup repair. - At `c57e532a87`, all 1255 cases in the six-file affected server family, recursive Node 24 typecheck and the full build pass. At production commit `1ae9f54107e1762bc8222572b365a013d4572d1a`, all 1,257 affected cases, recursive Node 24 typecheck and the full build pass. - Greptile found that the initial correction could restart a partial read after page two. On `c57e532a87`, following that correction fails with the actual reader cursor-order error. The follow-up continues the caller's most recent cursor and retains the changed-snapshot restart path. All nine new cases pass, including this regression, a stale-partial control, the foreign receipt refusal and the actual same-turn MCP sequence. - [Linux server3/12 job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41788671370/job/126437378334) found five failures in the older format-feedback SQL fixture. Its flat heartbeat row did not match the real joined projection. The same five failures reproduced locally. The test-only follow-up returns a coherent run/agent/task projection and keeps the real resolver and formatter assertions. All 14 format and real-PG/MCP cases pass, and the generated server test layer typechecks. Production code and the earlier 1,257-case/typecheck/build proof are unchanged. - Qualification of the shared-code change found 49 failures because whole-module mocks omitted the new exports. The three mocks now pass through actual module exports and keep their controlled reader methods. Literal error assertions remain independent. The final 1,284-case group passes with the exact 35 opt-in skips described above. No production fallback or substitute code was added. - [One Linux Runner package attempt](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41792315273/job/126448500037) passed 4,913 cases and skipped 10, but its synthetic post-rename credential durability case failed with ENOENT. The complete Runner package tree and lockfile are identical to the [earlier Linux control](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41790199252/job/126441739681), where all 42 credential cases passed on Node 24.22.2. The exact case also passes once on both base and head on macOS with Node 24.22.2. The original failure cause remains unverified; OS/load and shared-test timing uncertainty remain. Credential code and assertions are unchanged. The single affected-job rerun passes, including all 42 credential tests. The original failure remains unexplained. - An ordinary full local test attempt was stopped before the review repair. It has no completion summary and is INCOMPLETE. Current-head full CI completed; no local full-suite pass is claimed. Greptile reviewed the final published tip at 5/5 with zero open threads. All current-tip checks pass: 54 successful check runs, one successful legacy commit status, 3 skipped and 2 neutral, with no pending or failing checks. Paperclip also reviewed final tip `37bfb26943` at 5/5 with no remaining findings. Its prior 4/5 code-ownership recommendation is fixed and resolved. No review nudge or hosted task retry was issued. The controlled OpenCode process uses the supported v1 factory envelope to exercise the common native feedback and MCP boundary. It does not call a live model or qualify a provider pack. PostgreSQL, authorization, pagination and receipt checks are real. No hosted task, model, permission or saved result was changed. Recovery of an already accepted historical run remains unverified. ## Risks - Each finish call adds an exact binding query. A mandatory read also validates the current accepted-comment snapshot through the existing transaction. Cost grows with those exact comment IDs, bodies and attachment metadata; it does not scan unrelated task history or add idle polling. - A valid read can become stale before the provider settles. The unchanged terminal guard still rejects that race. - Missing ownership or unexpected validation errors remain refusals. This change does not grant replay authority or turn an accepted historical result into fresh work. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with repository inspection, code execution and GitHub tools. The runtime does not expose the exact serving model ID or context window. The coordinator performed independent read-only source review. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 07:19:12 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	b6352578c5	fix(task-retry): retain chat Retry during identity contention (#18896 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task Retry must preserve a person's request and enforce the current chat authority. > - Chat retry preparation takes nonblocking source locks before it can authorize the saved source. > - Sustained lock contention could discard the Retry request before it was saved. > - This pull request saves one unadmitted request in the existing chat retry queue. > - The worker checks the source and current access before normal admission. The task shows a scheduled retry while it waits. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? Task Retry returned HTTP 500 when another transaction held the saved chat principal's identity lock or the endpoint authorization row. The source preparation error rolled back the canonical Retry intent. The same gap existed when Retry had to restore a certified input batch that had never reached a provider. With the bounded synchronous retries in #18895, sustained contention returns 409 without a saved intent. Expected behavior HTTP 202 retains one Retry request. Acceptance does not grant source authority or mean that a provider started. The existing worker prepares the request if the source locks become available before its saved deadline. It must reject changed input, revoked access, Stop, or superseding work before input adoption, publication, or provider work. Steps to reproduce 1. Prepare a failed task with its original admitted GitHub chat source. 2. Hold that principal's `chat-identity` advisory lock or the endpoint row on a second PostgreSQL connection. 3. Send the normal task Retry HTTP request. Check the response and persisted intent. 4. Release the lock. Process the existing chat retry queue and check that one authorized successor is queued. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on master `8771606fd87f69ed4057779e3dce3a9bca8088e6`. Deployment mode Source checkout, real Express Retry route and embedded PostgreSQL. External chat transport is a test fixture. The live hosted fix has not been deployed or verified. Related: #18895 handles brief admission contention with bounded synchronous attempts and returns 409 if it remains busy. This change retains a durable request through sustained identity contention. It uses the existing background retry owner and adds real HTTP, restored-input, Stop, publication, restart, and task-presentation coverage. ## What Changed - Preserve a strict pending-source action only when the identity try-lock reports contention or the endpoint authorization query reports lock-unavailable through an explicit Retry callback. Bind it to the canonical task Retry, company, task, agent, endpoint, conversation, and principal. Other database and authorization errors keep their existing behavior. - Revalidate the canonical intent, current board permission, saved source, and latest execution before the existing worker can prepare that action. Ordinary authorization rejects an unprepared action. - Keep certified input restoration inside source preparation. Recheck the saved deadline before the prepared payload write. Expiry, a nested savepoint, or outer rollback cannot commit partial restoration. - Give source authorization contention one saved 60-second deadline and a separate counter. Keep its waiting phase until current source authorization succeeds or the action terminates. It does not spend the eight delivery attempts. Duplicate clicks, worker restart, and background sweeps do not renew either limit. Reuse the existing work notifications and outbox deadlines. - Persist completion of the authorization wait under the current claim before delivery. A restart revalidates current authority. Generic delivery failure preserves the stored phase even when a commit acknowledgment is lost; it does not grant a wake or renew the saved deadline, counters, or claim. - Project pending preparation and prepared but unsettled actions as the existing scheduled-retry state with the actual outbox deadline. Keep the exact task, intent, agent, and source binding. Active execution keeps its normal working state. No UI or API enum change is needed. - Add regressions and document the admission boundary. ## Verification - RED: the original real HTTP route returned 500 under a held PostgreSQL identity lock. The restored-input case also returned 500 while its 60 sibling source and budget cases passed. The current endpoint-row case returned 409 without a saved intent under the bounded synchronous fallback. - RED: the worker failed a valid Retry during an actual nine-second PostgreSQL lock. Removing only the latest-run guard makes the new queued-run negative fail. Source preparation could also commit restored input after its deadline, and an already prepared action could process after a late lock release. The prepared but unsettled task view lost its scheduled state. - GREEN: all 91 selected real PostgreSQL integration cases passed. Coverage includes the 62-case saved-input matrix; coalescing; restart; one real heartbeat successor; source, actor, Stop, newer-work and publication refusals; a real nine-second lock; fixed-deadline exhaustion; the separate eight delivery attempts; certified restoration rollback on expiry; prepared-action early and late release; a real conversation-row wait that crosses the deadline during current authorization; endpoint-row contention; unknown source; an already-revoked actor; unchanged unrelated ingress errors; durable-work idle settlement; actual outbox presentation deadlines; and recovery after authorization commits, with Stop and a lost commit acknowledgment. - GREEN: all 75 cases in `task-retry.test.ts`, `task-interruption-presentation.test.ts`, `chat-failed-run-retry-boundary.test.ts`, and `chat-action-work.test.ts` passed without a name filter. - RED → GREEN: stopping after source authorization committed left a stale waiting flag, so a fresh worker failed a previously authorized Retry after the deadline. The fix saves that phase in the same transaction. A real PostgreSQL commit followed by an injected lost acknowledgment also reproduced generic settlement restoring the stale flag. The corrected settlement preserves the stored phase. No wake is sent on the ambiguous response. Recovery queues once after current checks; Stop still prevents a successor. The deadline, contention count, original input, failed run, and publications stay unchanged. - Module boundary checks pass. Full workspace typecheck and the full build passed at `d8a4a1a739aa6825714b04691d4166a00991808b`. At this exact head, both required checks (`ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`) pass. The inventory has 53 successful, three skipped, and one neutral check, plus the automatic Paperclip Review in progress. The legacy Snyk status passes. Greptile is 5/5 on this head, with no new comments or unresolved threads. A current Paperclip assessment has not been published yet. - The full local `pnpm test:run` did not pass: its second chat shard hit a 15-second timeout in the HTTP/restart test after 348 and 293 passing cases. One bounded diagnostic of the same 642-case shard pair passed, with that case completing in 606 ms. The matching Linux CI pair passed too. The original timeout remains unexplained and nonreproduced. No timeout changed. The earlier stopped run was incomplete, and both conflicting documentation additions are retained. - CI chat 3/3 exposed a separate fixture assumption: restoration can commit before a durable wake receipt exists. One known pre-receipt delivery failure reproduces the same missing-run error. The corrected fixture drives the existing worker until the exact canonical intent and wake agree. It proves one real wake, one successor, exact source/actor binding, and one restoration. The exact failed shard pair now passes locally: 635 cases. Workspace typecheck also passes at test-only head `94d691c9df61b05019b96900d5800a8f1c484e9a`. Production source is unchanged from the previous verified build. That head completed all registered checks: 53 successful, two neutral, three skipped, plus the successful legacy status. Greptile scored 5/5. The subsequent Paperclip 4/5 persistence finding is addressed by the source repair above; its new exact-head review is pending. - Compatibility: 111 selected cases passed with #18895 head `9b5d877161ffcbf16c0fb6920e8155a3620c85b0` in a disposable worktree. The branch is now synchronized with master `4a83ba4050`, which includes that change. - Preserve the old CI failure: at head `37954951fb66f3b50d0f2a3bec78d6993c479e87`, server shard 6/12 initially failed the empty organization-audience replacement versus member-removal assertion in `tool-access-service.test.ts`. The exact race family passed on unchanged base and head; all 501 file tests and two 30-case controls passed on base. The one Linux replay passed 119 files and 2,833 cases, with three skipped. No guard or assertion changed. The initial failure remains unexplained and nonreproduced; this PR does not claim to fix it. - The prior external Superagent scan could not start because its Security Graph returned HTTP 503. Its neutral check was not a completed security assessment. - These tests exercise the real Express route, PostgreSQL transactions, and heartbeat queue. External chat transport is a fixture. They do not run a live model or prove recovery of an original hosted task. ## Risks - A still-pending source authorization wait fails after its fixed 60-second contention deadline. A completed wait is saved, but new contention keeps the original deadline. A healthy lock can exceed that limit. Other delivery errors retain the eight-attempt budget. Current authority checks remain required before admission. Inspection does not reset either limit. - The new pending phase must never be treated as an authorized chat source. Normal authorization rejects it until the worker prepares and binds the exact source. - The task projection reads the existing linked outbox deadline. It adds a scoped join and does not create a timer or change a business deadline. - No schema migration, provider identity change, or new delivery queue is included. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, tool use, and test execution. The host did not expose an exact deployment snapshot ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] Required Paperclip CI gates are green (`ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`; automatic review progress is recorded above) - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 07:18:48 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	c5251b4c0e	fix(chat): retry fully recorded setup failures before dispatch (#18882 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connected tasks retain their exact external request across failures. > - Task Retry must preserve that request and prove that old execution cannot continue. > - A workspace setup failure can settle before any provider dispatch. > - The chat retry guard accepted one specific validation failure but rejected other fully recorded setup failures. > - This pull request reuses the same strict server settlement proof for those failures. > - The benefit is one safe continuation through the existing queue, with all source and execution gates intact. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18803, #18845, #18852, #18853 and #18860. These changes preserve workspace writers, bind completed preservation, or repair other preparation and native continuation paths. This change repairs the separate connected-chat guard for fully recorded legacy setup failures. Search also found #18876, which repairs issue scope during deferred wake promotion and does not repair this guard. What happened? A connected task failed during workspace reservation before provider dispatch. Its source remained authorized. Task Retry saved an intent and chat action, but the chat worker rejected that request as `failed_chat_retry_not_authorized`. No successor was created. The old failure had a bootstrap marker, a dispatch-only Runner profile, the matching server error and durable measured settlement events, and no runtime, process, output, result or environment lease. Expected behavior A deliberate board Retry can continue the exact saved input after the complete never-dispatched proof passes. An unfinished earlier writer, changed source, accepted result or unknown execution state must still prevent execution. Steps to reproduce 1. Admit an authorized request through a restricted chat endpoint. 2. Settle setup before provider dispatch, for example while an earlier workspace writer is unfinished. 3. Keep the exact server error and durable measurement events, a dispatch-only Runner profile, and no execution resources. 4. Press task Retry after the independent writer and ordinary admission gates permit work. 5. The original guard saves the Retry action but refuses to create a successor. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on master at `a00109aa35`. The branch is rebased on current master. Deployment mode Hosted task diagnosis. Local proof uses real Express HTTP routes, chat authorization, heartbeat queue admission and disposable embedded PostgreSQL on macOS arm64, Node 26.4.0. Provider work is deliberately prevented by occupied fixture capacity. ## What Changed - Extend only canonical task Retry's existing strict pre-provider preparation proof to generic server-settled setup failures. - Keep exact result shape, dispatch profile, controller, runtime, process, output, event and resource checks. No diagnostic message allowlist is added. - Exercise GitHub and Telegram HTTP Retry with the original sender and saved input. Keep the failed run unchanged and create at most one queued successor. - Cover provider events, retained native state/results, modified source, unknown result metadata, live controllers, process identity, source leases and an independent unfinished writer. - Document the guarded contract and correct the obsolete access-map sentence. No new endpoint or agent permission is added. ## Verification - Red before repair: both setup causes failed through the real HTTP/chat/queue path because the durable Retry had no successor. An initial retained-native negative fixture had an invalid foreign-key setup; that fixture was corrected before the final run. - Green: 37 focused integration cases pass, including 22 new GitHub/Telegram cases and 15 existing pre-provider source and execution guards. - Current head `1bf69d20e02a049248ec378f087505563daeb9a0`: all 37 focused integration cases and full repository `pnpm -r typecheck` pass after the master rebase. The full `pnpm build` also passes. - Map structure, module boundaries and `git diff --check` pass. - Full local `pnpm test:run` is running; all six chat shards passed and the remaining server suites are progressing. This is not a full-suite pass claim. - Greptile and Paperclip Review both reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no actionable findings or review threads. - Initial CI passed all jobs except the unchanged Runner package suite. Its `runtime-host.test.ts` approve-reads case failed before its intended assertions because a managed credential home could not acquire its loopback-port quorum. The exact case passes locally. A wider 121-case check hit the same lease error in a different Pi case (120 passed); all 121 pass with one worker. The exact competing port owner is unknown. One unchanged retry of only failed CI jobs passed, including the Runner package suite and aggregate `ci / verify`. All current-head required CI gates are green; the original failure remains in workflow history. - The dependency setup initially missed the embedded PostgreSQL package's dylib symlinks. Running its own postinstall helper fixed the local setup before assertions. This was not a product test failure. - This change has not been deployed. The original hosted task has not been replayed with the fix. ## Risks - Never-dispatched proof must remain strict. A bootstrap marker or empty process fields alone cannot authorize continuation. The regression cases retain contrary-state holds. - The inherited session display hint remains history and supplies no resume authority. - Current connection, principal, source integrity, pause, budget, approval, dependency and workspace-owner gates remain in their existing owners. - No schema, provider profile, trust policy, model or credential permission changes are required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code editing, tool use and PostgreSQL/browser verification. This session does not expose a more specific deployment model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 07:18:40 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	d8c1b9d4b5	fix(runtime): reclaim failed remote checkpoint retries (#18877 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native recovery must preserve the original execution and provider state. > - A failed remote run can retain its provider PID after heartbeat releases the task execution lock. > - Normal resumption excludes that PID, while restart recovery rejects the released lock. > - Recovery must reclaim that exact execution only after current admission and durable ownership checks pass. > - Failed retries and admission holds need separate finite budgets. Neither can prove a provider stopped. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A failed remote native run remains in retryable failure without a task execution owner. Normal resumption and restart recovery both reject it before inspecting the preserved remote provider. The current remote workspace reference format also misses the due-retry routing path. Expected behavior A due exact-checkpoint retry reclaims its original task execution only when current ownership and safety gates permit it. Newer task input prevents an old claim. Lost or ambiguous provider state still prevents replay or replacement. Ineligible recovery eventually becomes a quiet manual reconciliation obligation. Steps to reproduce 1. Start a remote native run and persist its provider checkpoint and encrypted Runner authority. 2. Fail with exact-checkpoint recovery and a retained remote PID. 3. Release the task execution lock at heartbeat completion. 4. Run ordinary resumption and restart recovery after the retry deadline. 5. Observe that both reject the same eligible run before remote inspection. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced from source at `d59791828482`; integrated with upstream `db9be4c5a6`. Deployment mode Remote workspaces with PostgreSQL. Local regressions use disposable PostgreSQL and encrypted checkpoint persistence. Related public repairs #18846, #18854, #18860 and #18841 cover finished per-turn owners, pre-provider failures, unstarted follow-ups and storage migration. They do not reclaim this failed run's released execution lock. Merged #18879 also adds scheduled-resume lock retention and reclaim. This PR keeps that compatibility and requires encrypted Runner authority, canonical source ordering and a charged failed retry before reclaim. Its scheduled-resume regression now uses a real encrypted authority and retains a snapshot-only refusal control. ## What Changed - Share normal admission checks and one guarded execution-binding restore/event helper between normal and remote resumption. - Keep agent-name normalization in a module with no imports. Preserve heartbeat's existing export. Native admission no longer loads heartbeat orchestration for a string key. - Recheck company, assignment, agent eligibility, Stop, pause, approval, dependencies, execution and checkout ownership before reclaim. - Reject newer task input using PostgreSQL creation-time and ID ordering, preserving timestamp precision. - Require the recorded remote target, encrypted Runner authority, exact checkpoint identity and existing controller fence. - Commit task binding, controller lease, run status and recovery event atomically. Recognize both remote workspace reference formats. - Charge failed reattachments against the existing three-provider-attempt budget, including retained-lock crash windows. Active controller adoption preserves its charged attempt. - Use the existing five-retry/30-minute system-recovery policy for admission holds. Ended tasks and newer sources exhaust it immediately. Preserve PID, checkpoint and task bindings, suppress resource settlement, and assign manual reconciliation with executor stop/state explicitly unverified. - Register recovery intent before deadline writes; preserve live/future deadlines quietly and roll back zero-row writes. Record changed hold reasons once and terminal dispositions separately. - Keep historical provider-budget exhaustion behind current admission/source/controller/authority checks. Make an existing orphan-cleanup fixture explicitly due. - Include exact plugin task leases that have no workspace reference. Reuse every reclaim and retry-budget guard, with a bounded company/task/run lease projection. - Share strict manual ownership proof across stale-lock cleanup, adoption, queue release and wake admission. Require termination receipts for every exact remote lease before normal cleanup can release either binding. - Preserve governing Stop through the existing audited cancellation path. Its acknowledgement does not release an unverified provider. Ordinary Retry can wait for exact Stop and file preservation, then queue one continuation. ## Verification - Current head is `5d7baf74aa89d00d7ac6e1493d38a6ce2ae7b7b5`. Its [current CI matrix](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41782198858) is terminal and clean: 54 successful, three skipped and two neutral contexts. Required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e` pass. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact head with no open findings. No fresh Paperclip 5/5 assessment is claimed. - The [prior complete CI matrix](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41754365388) passed on `3e641466d3edcaa6dd5021d979627082d388eb05`, with Greptile and Paperclip both 5/5 and no open threads. - All 233 tests across the six affected heartbeat, restart-isolation, remote-admission, scheduled-resume and session-binding families pass on production-identical `a5104fa89f9cb493091e000bf21ed3858871ae46` under Node 24.22.2 and pnpm 9.15.4. They cover both workspace formats and plugin task leases, competing controllers, exact rollback, Stop, assignment/company boundaries, attempts, work-intent ordering, finite backoff and quiet held state. - The merge preserves #18931's per-run audit-failure isolation and this PR's unchanged-transition hold. Two initial composition cases failed because their setup or expected result described the older contract. The rollback test now expects the exact per-run deferral while retaining full coordinator equality and no work intent. The routine fixture writes a real encrypted checkpoint through the normal owner before reaching the actual routine unique constraint. No production admission guard or rollback assertion was weakened. A separate agent reviewed this exact merge and fixture delta without finding a blocker. - Full recursive `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass on production merge `89c616fe45ceff75db450f67fd34224b4df7441d`. Subsequent commits change only three test files. Both the two-file `a5104fa` and final `5d7baf` server test-layer typechecks pass. - Four production-identical `a5104fa` probes pass with the rebuilt actual Rust Runner, a scripted ACPX subprocess and encrypted PostgreSQL checkpoints under Node 24.22.2. Workspace-reference and plugin-lease admission each cover surviving and lost providers. Replacement preserves one provider launch, one original side effect, the charged attempt and restored task execution binding. Lost providers reject snapshot recovery without replacement. This is protocol-boundary evidence, not a live Claude or hosted provisioning claim. - Initial `a5104fa` CI found one additional routine integration fixture missing the persisted `exact_checkpoint_resume` mode. Its encrypted checkpoint was already present. The exact case fails locally before repair and passes after recording that mode and expecting the charged provider attempt. Every exact routine conflict, rollback, checkpoint, task binding, successor-count and sibling-startup assertion remains. Final head changes only that fixture. The correct native-server group passes all nine files: 175 executed cases and 14 container-only skips, matching the now-successful native-server CI gate. - The earlier canonical HTTP Retry acceptance passed on the prior reviewed head with real PostgreSQL, the recovery worker and real files. Pending Stop protects both bindings and starts no successor. Exact termination and copyback queue one preserved-workspace continuation. No browser or live-model outcome is inferred from that test. - The predecessor's full local `pnpm test:run` failed in an unchanged Discord Gateway fixture with a 200 ms lease and a 422 initial ownership error. Focused predecessor and untouched-base controls pass; that full-run cause remains unproved. The required command was also started on production-identical `a5104fa`. All six local chat shards passed, covering 1,850 cases. The duplicate local invocation was interrupted with SIGINT while the general-server group was still running after this head's complete CI and the combined repair qualification had passed. The wrapper exited 1 on cancellation, no process retained its test log, and no full local pass is claimed. An earlier attempt to select the native lane through the CI wrapper instead selected local package sharding: 2,631 cases passed and 13 failed. Those separate failures are retained without causal attribution or unrelated source changes; that run is not counted as native-server qualification. The direct native group and current complete CI matrix pass. - Live Claude Opus 5.5 continuation, hosted plugin provisioning, deployment and recovery of historical tasks remain unverified. No original task was retried or mutated for this verification. ## Risks - Restoring a task binding grants remote inspection; it does not prove that the provider survived. - Unknown effects, lost providers and missing semantic results retain their existing reconciliation requirements. - Exhausted admission holds preserve execution bindings and resource evidence for manual reconciliation. They do not authorize a fresh executor or provider/resource release. - The source guard is conservative: newer task input prevents recovery of an older failed source. - No database migration or provider profile change is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, code editing and shell execution. The runtime does not expose the exact model snapshot or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 07:18:07 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	c39e076638	fix(runner): retain the cause of closed ACPX sessions (#18872 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Runner records provider failures so the task can show their cause. > - An ACPX control request can fail and close its session before the event pump runs. > - The next poll then reports only that the session is closed. > - A second cleanup error can also drop a valid startup cause. > - This pull request retains each failure at its existing reporting boundary. > - Operators can inspect the cause while the failed session stays closed. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: Refs #18622, #18847, #18854. Those changes preserve provider causes and handle proven startup failures. This change covers a control failure after provider execution starts. What happened? A rejected sidecar control closes the ACPX session. A later poll replaces its error with `ACPX provider session is closed`. The native terminal loses the control classification. Separately, cleanup can discard an existing validated startup cause. Expected behavior Retain the first control classification in the failed terminal. Do not invent a provider explanation for that code. Keep a validated startup cause when cleanup also fails. Keep the session closed, uncertain tool outcomes pending, and the existing recovery checks effective. Steps to reproduce 1. Start an ACPX turn and receive an authorized tool call. 2. Return its result after the provider has retired that call. The sidecar rejects `tool.resolve`. 3. Poll the native backend. Before this change, the terminal reports only the closed-session guard. 4. For the separate startup case, combine a rejected `session.open` cause with a cleanup error. Before this change, the combined error drops its validated provider cause. Paperclip version or commit The two subprocess regressions and the cleanup-composition regression fail against unchanged production code at `683fa4725e`. Deployment mode Native Runner with ACPX. The process regressions use the real Rust subprocess transport and durable native backend. Their controlled stale-tool rejection matches the production sidecar response shape. The separate cleanup unit injects a cleanup error at the existing error-composition boundary. ## What Changed - Retain the first failure in the ACPX session and return it from later closed-state checks. - Keep the validated provider cause when cleanup also fails. - Match the stale-tool fixture to production. It carries the closed code and no invented provider cause. - Cover a rejected tool result, normal shutdown, raw sidecar-text exclusion, pending tool preservation, refusal of another turn, and terminal replay after controller restart. - Document the existing failure and recovery boundary. ## Verification - Red: both process regressions fail on the base code. Polling replaces the named control failure with the generic closed-session error. The cleanup unit also fails because the combined error loses its existing startup cause. - Green: all 12 ACPX session tests, all 36 native backend tests, and all four session unit tests pass. The stale-tool cases require the classification and absence of an invented provider cause. - Commands: `cargo test --manifest-path packages/paperclip-runner/runner/Cargo.toml --locked -p paperclip-runner-core --test acpx_provider_session` and the same command with `--test native_provider_backend`. - Map structure and whitespace checks pass. - At head `981faa4`, the full Runner core Rust suite passes: 847 tests passed and three existing tests are ignored. Workspace typecheck and build pass. The existing TypeScript provider-failure and durable-settlement boundary suites pass all 30 tests. - An earlier concurrent local Rust attempt missed an existing Codex diagnostic deadline. That case passes alone on baseline and head, and the final full suite passes with the local socket support its tests require. - Complete current-head CI passes: 55 successful checks, five intentional skips and two neutral checks; no failed or pending checks. Both `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e` pass. - Failed CI attempts were investigated before rerunning affected jobs. Logs showed runner shutdowns/lost communication, an unchanged Windows WebSocket authentication deadline, and an unchanged Cursor Cloud Stop-fixture assertion. The Cursor Cloud case passes on baseline and head. No test assertion or CI guard was disabled. - The local full `pnpm test:run` invocation passed all six chat partitions, covering 1,838 expanded cases. It was stopped as a duplicate while still in general-server after complete sharded CI passed. A completed local full Vitest run is not claimed. - Greptile and Paperclip reviewed the corrected head at 5/5 with no actionable findings. There are no unresolved review threads. - The process test exercises control rejection, process cleanup, durable terminal persistence, and controller restart. The provider boundary is a deterministic sidecar fixture. It is not a live Claude or hosted recovery test. - A genuine provider refusal or uncertain external effect remains unresolved. This change preserves its evidence and does not make it safe to replay. ## Risks - The first control classification becomes visible where a generic closed-session error appeared before. Raw sidecar error text stays excluded. Startup details use the existing validated and redacted `ProviderFailure` contract. - A stored failure must not grant execution authority. The failed session still rejects calls and new turns. Normal shutdown has no fabricated failure cause. - No provider profile, digest, retry budget, process ownership rule, migration, credential, or permission change is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with source inspection, code editing, command execution and regression tests. The exact runtime snapshot and context-window capacity are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used and available capability details - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in this PR with the bug template fields - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket ID - [x] I have run the local Rust, typecheck, build and boundary checks; complete sharded CI passes and the partial local Vitest result is reported above - [x] I have added behavioral regression tests - [x] I have updated the relevant execution and run-log documentation - [x] I have considered and documented the risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open findings - [x] I will address all review findings before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 07:17:58 -06:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	1a39dea9aa	fix(heartbeat): keep a routine claim queued while its slot is held (#18933 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A routine creates one task per tick. Only one open task of a routine can hold an execution lock (`issues_open_routine_execution_uq`). > - Since #18879, a failed native run that waits for a scheduled resume keeps its task's lock. Routine dispatch counts only queued, running or scheduled runs as live, so it can queue a newer task of the same routine meanwhile. > - When that newer run is claimed, stamping its execution lock violates the unique index. The raw database error is not a deferrable claim rejection, so it escapes the queue loop. The queue code notes that this can stop the agent's queue and startup recovery. > - This pull request turns that exact violation into a 409 claim rejection, so the run stays queued until the slot is free. > - The benefit is that a busy routine slot delays one run instead of stopping the queue or startup. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18879 (keeps a failed run's lock while its resume is pending), #18916 (defers the same unique-index conflict in restart recovery's lock reclaim) and #18931 (open; keeps one run's restart-recovery failure from stopping startup recovery). This is the same index conflict on a different path: the heartbeat queue claim, not restart recovery. It does not change #18916 or #18931. Its doc paragraph is separate from the one #18931 edits. What happened? While auditing the lock paths from #18879 for this index, I found that a queued run of a newer routine task can be claimed while an older task of the same routine still holds the slot through a failed run with a pending resume. The claim's lock stamp then raises `duplicate key value violates unique constraint "issues_open_routine_execution_uq"`. `isDeferrableClaimRejection` accepts only `HttpError` 4xx, so the error escapes `startNextQueuedRunForAgent`. Expected behavior The claim is rejected as a conflict and rolls back. The run stays queued and is claimed after the older task releases the slot. Other errors behave as before. Steps to reproduce 1. Create two open tasks of the same routine (same origin and fingerprint). 2. Give the older task an execution lock held by a failed run. 3. Queue a run for the newer task and claim it. On `master` the claim throws the unique violation. The new queue test runs these steps against PostgreSQL. Paperclip version or commit `master` at `0dedbf23c35`. Deployment mode Any server with routines whose tasks run on native runners. ## What Changed - `bindClaimedIssueExecution` in `server/src/services/heartbeat/queue.ts`: if stamping the execution lock violates `issues_open_routine_execution_uq`, it throws `conflict("Another execution for this routine is already in progress")`. The claim transaction rolls back, and the queue loop keeps the run queued as it does for other 4xx claim rejections. Every other error is rethrown unchanged. The issue checkout route already maps this violation to the same 409. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: one paragraph on the behavior. ## Verification - Failing first: `queue.test.ts` "keeps a claim queued while another task of its routine holds the execution slot". On `master` the claim raised the `issues_open_routine_execution_uq` violation. Now it rejects with 409, the run stays `queued`, neither task's lock changes, and nothing executes. - Failing first, review round 1: `heartbeat-queued-run-claim-isolation.test.ts` "keeps a routine run queued while another task holds the routine slot, then runs it once the slot is free" goes through `resumeQueuedRuns`. On `master` it rejected with the unique violation. Now the routine run stays queued with no error code while another queued run for the same agent executes. After the slot is released, the routine run executes exactly once (executions are counted per run, because the finished task can queue its own follow-up run). - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/heartbeat/queue.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-queued-run-claim-isolation.test.ts`: 70 passed. - `npx vitest run src/services/heartbeat/recovery.test.ts src/__tests__/routines*.test.ts`: 4 files, 205 passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`: pass. - Not verified: the queue loop end to end on a real instance. The loop's handling of a 4xx claim rejection is existing behavior. ## Risks - While the older task holds the slot, the newer run stays queued and the loop logs "queued heartbeat run claim was rejected" on each pass. It is claimed once the older task's resume finishes or its lock is released. - Only this one constraint is mapped. Other database errors still escape as before. - No schema migration. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs). The runtime does not expose the context window or reasoning configuration. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 21:33:00 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip	652cd76026	fix(ui): expose Stop for failed native retries (#18899 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and their tasks. > - A native run can fail while it still owns a same-run retry. > - The server supports Stop for that pending execution. > - Run details show Cancel only for queued or running records. > - A failed pending retry therefore has no ordinary cleanup control. > - This pull request exposes the existing Stop eligibility and uses the existing cancellation endpoint. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #14743 and #14733 for correlated native Stop. Those changes cover backend cancellation and protocol qualification. They do not add the failed-run control to run details. Searches of current master and open PRs found no matching UI repair. What happened? A native run can show failed while its coordinator still owns a retryable failure with no accepted result. The backend can cancel that retry. Both run-detail implementations hide the cancellation button because the record is terminal. Expected behavior The selected run offers Stop when the server confirms that pending native retry. Unknown, legacy, terminal and accepted-result states do not gain this control. Existing queued and running cancellation stays available. Steps to reproduce Render either run-detail implementation for a failed native run with an eligible retry. The original UI has no Stop button. The original batched execution projection has no eligibility field. The regression tests exercise both real components and the actual PostgreSQL projection query. Paperclip version or commit The missing control and projection field were reproduced on `44a4ca1c61`. Fresh master `8fd917aedf` has identical affected production blobs before this repair. Deployment mode Board run details for a native Runner task. Local verification uses rendered React components and PostgreSQL. No hosted task mutation or provider retry was performed. ## What Changed - Add optional `execution.canStop` to the existing batched projection. Read the matching retryable coordinator and absence of an accepted result. The cancellation endpoint remains the authority owner. Add no database queries. - Exclude Grok failed retries from the new hint and both consumers. The existing Grok Stop endpoint cannot accept a failed retry before assignment. Keep this limitation explicit and preserve its active-work authority checks. - Show Stop for eligible failed runs in both run-detail consumers. Keep the existing cancellation endpoint and its company, actor and row-lock checks. - Use the existing request-correlation contract for failed-native Stop. Persist one scoped identity before sending and recover it after remount or reload. Read a matching canonical claim only for the same board actor, company and run. Use the existing UUID fallback on ordinary HTTP. Never retry Stop automatically. Refresh the selected run and history after either outcome. - Report a stale conflict or a true no-op200 response. Accept a matching durable pending cancellation intent without requiring terminal acknowledgement. Keep running, queued and Grok calls unchanged. - Add actual rendered interaction tests, real batched-query controls and a short execution contract. Keep maps unchanged for this bug fix. ## Verification - Untouched UI and real Postgres producer reds cover missing Stop and missing eligibility. A valid Grok review found an unsupported failed-run action; actual broker, projection and rendered controls reproduce it before exclusion. No backend authority was expanded. - The original60-case focused suite passed, including26 rendered cases, the batched producer, and actual Grok broker/assignment fences. The related57-case scope passed before the Grok correction; it is not presented as final-head proof. - A fresh native4/5 review found a stale200 no-op. Both actual rendered consumers failed that new assertion. The real authenticated HTTP/Postgres fixture proves `canStop=true`, coordinator revocation, uncorrelated unchanged200 with a cancellation activity, and existing correlated409 with no new activity or run mutation. - The correlated repair passed82 affected cases before master reconciliation. Exact `74c60c9ffe11c05bc85f3d0fa5a136f7e9d445cd` passed80 rendered/API, HTTP and native-correlation cases. The render scope verifies request bodies, stable identity after an unknown outcome, no-op200 error, pending intent acceptance, wrong-run/request denial and existing active/Grok behavior. - Subsequent current-head reviews found remount identity loss and unavailable `crypto.randomUUID` on ordinary HTTP. The corrected helper passed 52 rendered cases across both consumers, including an unknown response, initial scoped storage persistence, a prior browser record with a unique never-mounted run identity, exact ID reuse, canonical claim recovery, actor switch, wrong run and HTTP UUID fallback. A real local-board identity mismatch was reproduced with two additional reds before using the actual server-projected actor ID. - Real authenticated HTTP and existing native-correlation suites passed 45 cases for canonical claim recovery and actor fences. Production UI, server and vendored Runner builds and all server/UI type layers passed at the prior reviewed helper head; exact final `e0f723b1c86f1529029bf141943323764de28c22` UI types, token gates and production build passed. - Fixture failures are retained separately: a missing local SDK build dependency, and a missing coordinator FK teardown in the new HTTP fixture. Neither is a behavior red. Both fixtures were corrected and the affected tests passed. - Previous-head3d CI required one diagnostic rerun after a Runner shutdown and a real account-list migration assertion. Two untouched157-test runs did not reproduce the assertion. Complete original row equality is unavailable. The assertion remains unresolved; no test was sorted, skipped or changed to green CI. - Previous-headf12 CI lost eight child runners. Its one authorized failed-job retry also lost e2e5 to an explicit shutdown. No second retry was issued. Those failures remain recorded. Current-head CI and both substantive reviews are required; older checks and grades are not credited. - Previous-head74c CI found a real monitor scheduler timeout. An untouched local replay and diagnostic-only replay reproduced it: the original manual-monitor run was still running at the unchanged three-second deadline. The cause remains unresolved; temporary diagnostics were removed, and no assertion, timeout or production monitor policy was changed. No CI retry was issued. - Exact local `906af5c942ee0963eb4b64552160b57a18bcd2d1` integrates normal master after #18930 merged. All reviewed Stop production and test blobs remain unchanged from `e0f723b1c86f1529029bf141943323764de28c22`. The four rendered, projection, HTTP and correlation files passed 99 cases after integration. All UI/server type layers, token gates and production UI/server/Runner builds passed at that exact head; the server build stamp records it. - Previous-head e0 CI reported a Discord ownership error. That original failure is preserved. Separate #18930 proves and repairs receiver construction/renewal races with the same error; the original CI scheduling order remains unproved. This branch now contains that ordinary master merge and requires fresh CI rather than rerunning the old failed attempt. - Full repository checks were not run locally for this narrow slice. No hosted task, provider execution or Stop receipt was created by this work. ## Risks Grok failed retries remain unsupported by this UI change. The existing Grok running and queued Stop action, revoke path and assignment fences are unchanged. A valid initial review caught the overbroad hint; actual broker, projection and rendered regressions reproduce it before correction. No backend cancellation authority was widened. The optional hint can become stale. It grants no permission. The existing cancellation path rechecks current authority and can reject the request. Run details show that rejection. Older servers omit the hint, so failed runs keep their existing behavior until the server updates. No retry, task hold, accepted-result decision or provider receipt is changed. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`) in Codex, with source editing, terminal execution and tool use. The host did not report its context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 23:18:08 -06:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	6c7b136b16	fix(native): keep startup recovery running when one run's claim fails (#18931 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - At startup, the server runs native restart recovery before it reports ready. Recovery claims each interrupted or retryable native run in its own transaction. > - On one instance, one run's claim hit the routine execution unique index. The error escaped restart recovery, startup recovery failed closed, health stayed "still starting", and two deploys rolled back. > - #18916 fixed that exact conflict: it defers the run when its claim hits `issues_open_routine_execution_uq`. Any other error in one run's claim still aborts the whole pass, and so does a failed per-run audit write. > - This pull request handles every per-run claim failure the way #18916 handles the routine conflict, and keeps a failed audit write from stopping committed claims. > - The benefit is that one bad row cannot keep the server from becoming ready, and no run is claimed or changed when its claim fails. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18916. This change generalizes its catch: #18916 keeps the routine-conflict disposition (`routine_execution_busy`) exactly as it is, and this change adds a separate reason for any other per-run failure. It does not change how the routine conflict is detected or deferred. Refs #18879, whose lock reclaim exposed the startup failure. Refs #18877 (open), which edits other parts of the same files. This change touches only the claim's error path and the audit loop, so a second merge needs at most a small rebase. What happened? Two deploys never became healthy. About 25 seconds after the listener bound, the boot log showed `startup native runner restart recovery failed closed` and `startup heartbeat recovery failed`, both from a failed `update "issues" set "execution_run_id" = ...` that violated `issues_open_routine_execution_uq`. #18916 now defers that violation. Any other error in one run's claim (another constraint, a trigger, a timeout) still escapes `claimNativeRestartRecoveries` and fails startup the same way. #18916's own test asserts this: "Other database failures still fail the recovery pass." Expected behavior One run's recovery failure is logged and recorded on that run, and the rest of startup recovery continues. The server becomes ready. Only a failure of the candidate scan itself fails the pass. Steps to reproduce 1. Create a native run that is due for restart recovery, and make its claim fail (the new test uses a trigger on `native_run_finalizations`). 2. Add a healthy run that is due for restart recovery. 3. Run restart recovery for both. On `master` the batch throws and the healthy run is not claimed. Paperclip version or commit `master` at `4a83ba4050f`. Deployment mode Any server that runs startup native restart recovery. ## What Changed - `claimNativeRestartRecoveries`: #18916's `.catch` on each candidate's claim transaction no longer rethrows other errors. The whole claim has rolled back, so the run's state is unchanged and nothing is claimed. The run gets `awaiting_evidence` with the same 30-second retry deadline. The reason stays `routine_execution_busy` for the routine slot conflict, and is the new `restart_recovery_failed` for any other error, which is logged at error level. The batch continues. - `recoverNativeRunsAfterRestart`: records a `restart_recovery_failed` deferral as a warning transition on the run ("Native restart recovery failed for this run and will retry"). A failed `getRun` or transition write is logged and no longer stops the dispatch of claims that already committed. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: replaces "Other database failures still fail the recovery pass" with the per-run rule. ## Verification - Failing first: `native-restart-recovery-isolation.test.ts` (new, PostgreSQL). It seeds the reported shape (two open tasks of one routine: the older with a due scheduled resume and a cleared lock, the newer holding the lock), a run whose claim fails through a trigger, and a healthy run. On `master` the batch threw `injected recovery claim failure`. Now the routine run is deferred with `routine_execution_busy` and the failing run with `restart_recovery_failed`, and both keep their coordinator, attempt and locks. The healthy run is claimed. `recoverNativeRunsAfterRestart` completes and records an info transition for the routine run and a warning transition for the failing run. - Two existing tests expected the pass to reject on one run's failure: #18916's unrelated-constraint test, and failed-workspace retention's rollback test. They now expect the per-run deferral. Their rollback checks (no claim, unchanged coordinator, lease, lock and recovery actions) are unchanged, and the unrelated failure still does not become a routine wait. - `cd server && npx vitest run` over restart recovery (isolation, integration, diskless, preparation), controller recovery, heartbeat recovery, scheduled resume lock, failed-workspace recovery, startup cleanup, native resumption, live recovery work, startup feedback export, recovery deadlines, runtime selection, stop accounting, warm transition restart, workspace reconstruction, remote workspace migration and heartbeat process recovery: all pass except one. `heartbeat-process-recovery` "redacts opaque environment-bound credentials from Sentry diagnostics: result" fails the same way on unmodified `master` on this host (a local environment value is redacted). - Review round 1: two `heartbeat/recovery.test.ts` cases make `getRun` and then `appendRunEvent` fail for a deferred run while a committed claim is in the same batch. Recovery completes and dispatches the claim exactly once; the `appendRunEvent` case also checks the warning transition. Both fail when the catches are removed. In one of four full runs of that file, the unrelated orphan-cleanup case "reconstructs missing native preservation during orphan cleanup without replay: reuse_by_environment" failed; it passed alone and in the other three full runs. - After the rebase onto `4a83ba4050f`: the isolation and failed-workspace recovery tests and `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` pass. - Not verified: a deploy to a real instance. ## Risks - A persistent per-run error now retries every 30 seconds and logs an error each time, instead of stopping startup. The run stays unclaimed, so ownership does not change. - If the database fails for every candidate's claim, startup recovery now completes with every run deferred, instead of failing closed. The candidate scan still fails closed, and the deferred runs retry on their deadlines. - No schema migration. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs). The runtime does not expose the context window or reasoning configuration. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 21:05:27 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip	4a83ba4050	fix(workspaces): isolate unpublished preparation directories (#18922 ) Bind new remote preparation directories to the writer epoch and environment lease. Preserve earlier unpublished files and the recorded path for published warm workspaces. Run the interrupted reused-allocation and saved-file lifecycle regressions with owned Postgres by default, and retain the warm-path recovery checks. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 22:30:48 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	f211d44c00	fix(heartbeat): preserve queued coalesced comments at claim (#18913 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and their work. > - The wake queue records task comments before an agent starts. > - A queued run can accept another comment through coalescing. > - Claim rebuilds that run's input from its primary wake. > - Coalescing updated the run and its receipt but left the primary batch unchanged. > - This change saves the accepted batch atomically in the owning writer. > - The benefit is complete input at claim without repeating old work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #18887 preserves offline queued turns. #13948 addresses equivalent automatic wake deduplication. This change repairs the accepted comment batch at the existing claim boundary. What happened? A queued run started with comment A. Admission accepted comment B, saved `[A, B]` in the run context, and finished B's coalesced receipt. The primary wake still held `[A]`. Actual claim rebuilt input from that wake and dropped B. Expected behavior Claim must retain every accepted live comment in order. Stop, changed source authority, deleted comments, and company boundaries must still apply. Already claimed wakes must retain their existing recovery source. Steps to reproduce 1. Queue a task run whose primary wake has an authoritative comment batch `[A]`. 2. Admit comment B through `createHeartbeatQueue.enqueueWakeup` and the real Postgres admission writer. 3. Confirm that admission accepts `[A, B]` and records B's coalesced receipt. 4. Claim the original queued run. Before this fix, the claimed input contains only A. Paperclip version or commit The untouched producer regression fails on `d7283e875772ca8c684dc86e471e6b48d543b7b1` with both process and native Runner/Codex adapter selection. Provider execution is disabled in the fixture. ## What Changed - Save the accepted comment batch in the unclaimed primary wake, run context, and coalesced receipt in one transaction. - Lock the primary wake before the run. Recheck the expected run status and same-company, same-agent and run bindings; apply the existing actor equality fence only to durable receipts before mutation. - Preserve incoming input as normal deferred work when the locked source changed. Preserve receipt identity and actor fields. - Preserve the original primary actor and trigger comment while updating its accepted batch. Each incoming receipt retains its actual actor. Keep claimed source payloads and legacy envelopes on their existing recovery paths. - Safely defer a same-named different agent without rewriting the original agent's run, wake or receipt. Missing and foreign-company targets remain rejected. Do not rebuild input from historical receipts. - Add actual process/native producer, real database rollback, Stop, deletion, foreign-source, and fallback controls. Update three direct writer fixtures for the required expected-status contract. ## Verification - The untouched process and native producer red on `d7283e875772ca8c684dc86e471e6b48d543b7b1` loses accepted comment B at actual claim. The initial incomplete mock is retained separately and excluded from behavioral proof. - Current process/native matrix: 22 passed, including mixed authors, system primary, same-named different agents, changed status, claimed sources, Stop, deletion and foreign-source boundaries. Queue, Postgres admission and use-case suites passed 234 cases before the source-preserving serializer follow-up; its 22 actual producer cases passed again afterward. - CI on the previous head found a real ordinary mixed-author workspace-copyback regression. The earlier 13-case selection omitted this test; that coverage gap is preserved. The first correction exposed a second real source-provenance/copyback failure. After preserving the primary trigger and actor while updating only its batch, the complete workspace recovery file passed all 188 cases, including ordinary mixed-author input and native copyback. - Real HTTP queued-comment consumption, discard/reorder and Stop boundaries: 101 passed before these review corrections. Existing chat and Slack consumers each passed their selected real writer case. - Previous-head CI also timed out in the CLI child-server startup fixture and a ZIP transfer case. The full untouched transfer file passed 17 cases locally. Startup remains unclassified; its intentionally reserved port is part of the fixture and is not diagnosed as the cause. No CI retry was issued. - An earlier queue run passed its 231 assertions but timed out during teardown; its preserved replay passed all 60 queue cases. This is distinct from the behavioral reds. - Exact `ab59d944895774d89f950248e356e93af00f4832` server type layers and production server/Runner build passed. The unchanged-default serializer file passed all 11 cases. Current-head CI and both substantive reviews remain required; previous grades and checks do not qualify this head. - No hosted task was retried or changed. Local tests do not establish any hosted deferred event's cause, provider execution, native acknowledgement, physical cleanup, or serving revision. ## Risks - Admission now performs bounded row reads and locks for each coalesced wake. It adds no idle scan or remote request. The existing task transaction owns the operation; lock order follows queued claim. - Claimed-wake recovery uses source identity. Its payload remains unchanged, and the existing actual native copyback tests cover that boundary. - A source that changes before the lock can defer the new input. This preserves work instead of consuming it into a stale run. No migration or historical backfill is required. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with reasoning, repository inspection, shell execution, and test tools. The runtime does not report the context-window size. A separate OpenAI coordinator reviewed the source. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 22:09:58 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	e7549ab613	fix(runtime): defer native routine recovery collisions (#18916 ) Treat the exact routine execution unique conflict as a pending recovery obligation after the complete losing transaction rolls back. Preserve the current routine owner, provider attempt and checkpoint, and continue the startup batch. Cover real constraint failures, row preservation, one reclaim after release and unrelated database failures. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 21:47:56 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	e2dc2cc0be	fix(native): retire idle shared-sandbox ingress owners before dispatch (#18893 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and their tasks. > - Native tasks can share one reusable sandbox workspace. > - A completed child can keep its provider process warm. > - A parent has its own logical session, but the sandbox has one ingress listener. > - Retirement by task identity leaves the child's listener in place. > - A new parent Runner then fails to bind that listener. > - This pull request retires a proven idle physical owner before the parent's distinct session starts. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15353 and #17097 for listener configuration and warm transport rotation. Refs #18682 for owned process retirement. #18860 repairs a different resume-source failure. Searches found no existing repair for retained warm sessions on different tasks that share the same physical ingress allocation. What happened? A completed child and a later parent can use the same reusable sandbox. Warm-session retirement compares logical task ownership. It does not find the child's distinct task scope. The child keeps the fixed ingress listener, and the parent's new process fails with `runner_ingress_bind_conflict` / address already in use. Expected behavior A parent must start in its own logical session after the proven idle prior listener closes. Active, foreign or unverified owners must remain protected. Steps to reproduce Run the `retires the completed child listener` cases in `native-session-executor.test.ts`. The actual executor registers a warm child. PostgreSQL holds its committed, accounted result and clean expired lease. A distinct parent receives the same allocation and current workspace writer. The provider boundary uses real TCP listeners. The original executor reaches the second bind with the child still listening and fails with EADDRINUSE. The changed executor waits for the owned close, then starts the distinct parent session. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on `ab2d2098a2`. The branch includes current master `44a4ca1c61` before this PR was opened. Deployment mode Native Runner with provider ingress on a reusable sandbox workspace. Local regression uses real PostgreSQL and local TCP with a controlled provider-process boundary. No hosted provider call was made. ## What Changed - Keep physical ingress identity separate from logical task/session ownership. Never attach the parent to the child's session. - Reserve a physical allocation during local admission. Retire a distinct warm owner only after canonical company, agent, workspace, provider, allocation, lease, task and coordinator checks pass. - Require the current remote workspace writer and location to match the admitted run. Require the prior run to be committed and accounted, with its original controller generation and a clean released or expired lease. - Use the existing close, checkpoint and stopped-file collection path. Wait for close before parent dispatch, then recheck canonical authority before staging files or calling the parent backend. Retain the entry when close is uncertain. - Add actual executor/PostgreSQL/TCP safety cases and document the contract. Keep maps unchanged for this bug fix. ## Verification - Untouched production at `ab2d2098`: actual executor + PostgreSQL + TCP fails EADDRINUSE. Same positive case passes after the change. - Final focused suite: 20 passed. It covers distinct parent session identity; foreign company, allocation and workspace; active or unaccounted owner; changed controller; reassignment; competing lease/writer; stale allocation metadata; Stop before and after claim; workspace-lock race; failed close that leaves the listener and accepted result intact; and controller transfer, Stop or writer change during awaited close. These last cases reject the stale parent before backend invocation after the old listener closes. - Untouched head3425acbe: transferring the incoming coordinator during close still reaches the parent backend. The same actual executor/PostgreSQL/TCP case passes after the post-close authority check. - Broader `native warm session supervision` suite: 160 passed. This run preceded the final two-line logical-session collision guard; the final 20-case suite includes that guard. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`: all source and test layers passed, including `src/__tests__`. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server build`: production server and Runner build passed at current head572acfef79. The exact-head build stamp is recorded. - The provider/close boundary is controlled. The fixture seeds canonical committed/accounted finalization data in PostgreSQL. These tests do not claim a live model result, operator ACK, hosted PID-to-listener identity, or recovery of a historical task. - Full repository pnpm checks were not run locally for this server-only slice. Required current-head CI and reviews are pending. ## Risks The new retirement path can close a process from another task. It requires the same canonical company, agent, allocation and workspace, a current exclusive writer, and a completed idle owner. Missing or changed evidence leaves admission blocked. Active owners, changed generations, reassignment and cancellation remain fenced. A failed close retains the owner and saved result. This covers current-controller warm entries with recorded physical identity. Historical processes outside the registry keep the existing exact-owner recovery requirements. No port shuffle, port kill, task capability expansion, new polling loop or invented receipt is added. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`) in Codex, with source editing, terminal execution and tool use. The host did not report its context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 19:44:12 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	7b1c53f8f1	fix(recovery): continue verified preparation after lease interruption (#18892 ) Use recorded system interruption and the existing execution, controller, stopped-lease, and saved-file proof instead of a shutdown-only error label. Preserve bounded retries, user Stops, task authority, and exactly one continuation. Keep the chat recovery fixture faithful to the preparation stage and terminal time written by the real lifecycle. Retain missing-field safety controls. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 18:54:16 -06:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	4e29f00139	fix(native): keep settled ACPX sessions across Runner upgrades and run scheduled resumes (#18879 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native Runner keeps one ACPX provider conversation across the per-turn runs of a task. Each run cold-attaches the session that the previous run settled. > - The saved ACPX state binds the digest of the launch profile that wrote it. Every deploy ships a new provider pack, so that digest changes. > - After a deploy, the next run of such a task fails `run.attach` with `ACPX durable launch profile digest does not match runner startup`. Every same-run retry fails the same way. > - On one instance this happened seven times. Six tasks used their retry budget and ended blocked, or in progress with no runner. In the seventh, the scheduled same-run resume never ran at all: the task stayed `in_progress` with nothing running, and its monitor did not fire. > - This pull request re-binds a settled session to the upgraded launch profile, types the remaining mismatches so the server stops retrying them, and makes a scheduled remote resume survive the stale-lock sweep. > - The benefit is that a task continues its conversation after a deploy. When it cannot, it stops with a clear next action instead of stalling. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18846, #18847, #18854 and #18860 (nearby native recovery changes). Refs #15795, an open change to the same stale-lock sweep function. It changes run teardown, not lock cleanup, so a second merge needs at most a small rebase. What happened? A per-turn native task used provider `acpx` with Claude, driver `acpx_runtime`, on a remote sandbox. 1. Run A succeeded and settled its provider session. The next run with the same build cold-attached it. 2. The instance deployed a new build. 3. A board approval woke run B in a fresh sandbox. Run B failed after about five minutes: `native_session_recovery_failed: Error: PRP command run.attach failed: {... "result":{"code":"command_execution_failed","message":"ACPX durable launch profile digest does not match runner startup"}}`. 4. The coordinator recorded `retryable_failure`, attempt 1, `native_session_interrupted`, recovery mode `exact_checkpoint_resume`, recovery state `resuming_session`, and a retry 30 seconds later. 5. Two seconds after the failure, the stale-lock sweep cleared the task's execution and checkout locks, because run B was `failed`. 6. Forty minutes later the attempt was still 1. The scheduled monitor had not fired. The task stayed `in_progress` with nothing running. Expected behavior A session that the previous run settled continues after a deploy. If it cannot continue, the run stops at once with a clear next action. A scheduled resume either runs or fails visibly. Steps to reproduce 1. Save a suspended ACPX session under one launch profile. 2. Change the sidecar bytes and the provider-pack authority at the same paths. 3. Cold-attach the next run in a new runner. Restore fails with the digest mismatch. 4. For the stall: leave a remote native run `failed` with a due `retryable_failure` coordinator, run the stale-lock sweep, then run restart recovery for that run. It returns `blocked: issue_execution_lock_changed` and writes nothing. The new Rust and PostgreSQL tests run these steps. Paperclip version or commit `master` at `b0c4e345267`. Deployment mode Native Runner, per-turn lifecycle, remote sandbox. The re-bind applies to every ACPX agent with an ordinary startup. ## What Changed ### Root causes - Upgrade failure. `AcpxLaunchProfile::canonical_digest` hashes the provider-pack authority, the sidecar command and arguments, each artifact path and SHA-256, and any candidate admission. For a remote sandbox the authority is the provider-pack manifest digest, which covers the Runner source revision and dist digest. So every deploy changes it. `AcpxDurableState` stores only the digest, and `validate()` rejects any difference. Only a Kimi candidate run binding had a carve-out. - Silent stall. The failure write keeps the task locks for `retryable_failure` and clears them only for `terminal_failure`. The stale-lock sweep treats any `failed` run as cleanable, so it cleared them. A remote retry goes through `claimNativeRestartRecoveries`. That claim requires `issues.execution_run_id` to name the run, so it returned `blocked: issue_execution_lock_changed` with no coordinator write and no deadline. The live recovery queue then dropped the entry. The local claim (`claimNativeSessionResumptions`) already reclaims a free lock, so only remote runs stalled. - Monitor. `noActiveNativeMonitorRun` holds a task's monitor while any native run for it has a coordinator that is not `committed` or `terminal_failure`. Run B's `retryable_failure` held it. That is by design; it ends when the resume runs. ### Runner (Rust) - `rebinds_settled_session` in `acpx_provider_backend.rs`. Restore re-binds a saved session to the current launch profile only when all of these are true: - The lifecycle is `suspended` and an identity exists. There is no active turn, pending runtime request, undelivered provider event, or unconfirmed provider exit. - The startup has no candidate admission. - The saved descriptor's sidecar command and arguments equal this startup's. - Any other digest mismatch keeps failing with the same message, plus `classification: "provider_state_incompatible"` in the durable command result. `DurableRunnerError` carries an optional closed classification for this. - A saved descriptor that names an agent release this build does not qualify (ACPX version, agent server package or version, or command digest) also gets the class. `validate_session()` and its message are unchanged; restore only adds the class. ### Runner (TypeScript) - `runnerRecoveryFailureClass` reads the classification from the authenticated `runnerCommandResult`. The Codex app-server driver (which also drives ACPX through runnerd) and `HarnessDriverBackend` pass it on as `failureClass`. - If replacement after a failed resume is not allowed, `executeNativeSession` throws `NativeProviderStateIncompatibleError` (message unchanged: `native_session_recovery_failed: ...`). If replacement is allowed, the existing path opens a fresh session in the same run, as before. ### Server - `nativeSessionFailureSourceCode` maps that error class to `native_provider_state_incompatible` with `instanceof`, not text. The disposition is permanent: `terminal_failure` at once, the task blocks, and the board owns the recovery action. Its next action says that a Retry continues in a fresh provider session with the same workspace. - `findNativeSessionResumeRun` also returns the barrier's `errorCode`. `rebindNativeSessionCheckpoint` does not resume a source with `native_provider_state_incompatible`. The existing fallback in `buildNativeExecutionWithCheckpoint` then starts a fresh normalized session with the full task bootstrap. - `sweepStaleIssueLocks` keeps both locks while a referenced run's coordinator owns a result-less `retryable_failure`, unless the task is done or cancelled. Its update also requires that no referenced run has a live status at the write, because a resume claim can return the run to running after the status read. - `claimNativeRestartRecoveries` reclaims a free execution lock for a `retryable_failure` resume, like the local claim does, when the checkout lock is free or held by this run and no other run for the task is queued, running or scheduled. It records `native.recovery.execution_reclaimed`. A lock held by another run still blocks. - Docs: `packages/paperclip-runner/docs/durable-recovery.md` and `doc/execution-semantics.md`. ### Safety argument for the re-bind What the binding protects, and what this change keeps: - Candidate admission carries company, model, platform and expiry authority. A candidate startup never re-binds. The Kimi run-binding carve-out and all candidate rejections are unchanged. - The agent that loads the conversation stays exact. `validate()` runs on the saved descriptor before the digest check and requires this build's qualified agent profile: ACPX version, agent server package and version, and `commandDigest`. The saved identity must still match that profile and the provider mode. - In-flight provider work is never re-bound. A turn, runtime request, undelivered event or unconfirmed exit keeps the strict binding, so no old provider process or request continues under a new build. The next launch only loads a settled conversation. - Launch shape. A changed sidecar command path or arguments still rejects. Only the content at the same paths may change. - Artifacts are not trusted from the saved state. The current profile comes from the trusted controller at startup, and session start verifies every artifact's bytes and the restored provider identity, as before. What changes: a new provider-pack authority, or new sidecar or Node bytes, at the same paths no longer invalidates a settled conversation. The saved digest cannot show which part changed, so the rule does not depend on it. I did not add state fields to tell authority changes from artifact changes, because the rule would treat both the same. One existing assertion changes. `released_kimi_cold_restore_rejects_candidate_injection_and_changed_full_profile` expected a settled ordinary Kimi session to reject a changed authority, artifact digest, or saved digest. Those three cases moved to a new positive test. Command, arguments, every candidate grant field, a missing profile and run binding still reject. ### How a task in the reported state recovers after this deploys The task has old-digest saved state, a `retryable_failure` coordinator at attempt 1, and cleared locks. 1. Startup recovery, and the live recovery queue, run restart recovery for the due run. It reclaims the free execution lock and claims the run. The resume runs now. 2. Run B's failed `run.attach` is a durable outcome of B's exact run authority. If the resume replays that outcome instead of executing it again, it fails with the old, untyped text. The remaining attempts then fail the same way, and the run ends `terminal_failure` with `native_session_retry_exhausted`. The task blocks with a board recovery action. This takes about a minute. 3. If the task blocks, press Retry once. Retry selects run B as the source (it has process identity and controller evidence, so the #18860 skip does not apply) and rebinds B's checkpoint, which holds A's provider session. The new run cold-attaches under the new Runner, and restore re-binds the old digest because the session is suspended and quiescent. The conversation continues. Run B's failed attach never wrote the state file, so the state is still A's settled state. 4. Tasks that already exhausted their retries (blocked, or in progress after `native_session_retry_exhausted`) need the same single Retry. Their earlier attempts ran under the old Runner. Wait for the task to show blocked before pressing Retry. A Retry pressed while the resume is running joins that run. ## Verification - Rust, failing first: `settled_session_rebinds_to_the_upgraded_runner_launch_profile` failed on `master` with the production message. `unsettled_or_relocated_session_keeps_the_strict_launch_binding` failed on the missing classification. Both pass now. - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --no-fail-fast`: all 41 test binaries pass. The library has 471 passed and 1 ignored. - `cargo fmt --check`, and `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner typecheck` (TypeScript, generated contracts, `cargo check`): pass. - Server, failing first: `native-scheduled-resume-lock.test.ts` (PostgreSQL). On `master` the sweep cleared the locks and restart recovery returned `issue_execution_lock_changed`. Both negative controls (another run's lock, a queued run) already passed. All four tests pass now. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`: pass. - Runner vitest (`src/native-session-runtime.test.ts`, `src/backends`, `src/drivers/codex`, `src/drivers/provider-failure.test.ts`, `src/live/runnerd-codex-transport*.test.ts`, `src/control-plane/acpx-controller-recovery.test.ts`): 31 files, 1,011 tests pass. New: the typed error when same-session recovery is required, and the recovery class reader and pass-through. - Server vitest: the native executor, status corpus and provider-pack admission suites (1,268 tests) pass. New: the classifier makes the typed error permanent, and the same text stays retryable. Checkpoint selection returns `errorCode`, and an incompatible source starts a fresh session with the same workspace (unit and PostgreSQL). - Server vitest over the recovery area: stale-lock sweep, native resumption, process recovery, failed-workspace recovery, restart recovery (integration, diskless, preparation), controller recovery, startup retry, startup cleanup, recovered-owner follow-up, session resume, runtime selection and recovery deadlines. 926 passed. Four `heartbeat-process-recovery` tests failed in that loaded run. Three pass when I run them alone. `redacts opaque environment-bound credentials from Sentry diagnostics: result` fails the same way on unmodified `master` on this host (a local environment value is redacted). - Review round 1: a new sweep test returns the run to running before the clear. It cleared the locks without the write recheck and keeps them with it. The strict Rust restore test covers an older agent server release and an older ACPX release. The ACPX backend and durable runner unit tests, the lock, sweep, resume projection and controller recovery suites, `cargo fmt --check` and the server typecheck pass. In the second full cargo run, the two `stdio_mcp` relay tests timed out waiting 5 s for a child exit on this loaded host. They do not use the changed code and passed in the first full run. - After the rebase onto the current `master`: the new lock test, failed-workspace recovery, stale-lock sweep and session resume suites pass (189 tests). Server typecheck, `pnpm check:module-boundaries` and `git diff --check` pass. - CI on `929ef4508d2`: in the first run, `isolated-repository-rehome` hit its 15 s test timeout, `idle-completed-history` could not reach its fixture runtime service, and e2e shard 3 was cancelled by a runner shutdown. A rerun of the failed jobs passed. All 55 checks pass. - Not verified: a live remote sandbox deploy, and whether run B's same-run resume replays its recorded `run.attach` failure or executes it again. The Retry path is tested at source selection and checkpoint rebind (server) and at cold attach (Runner). It is not tested end to end through a sandbox. ## Risks - A settled session now continues under new sidecar bytes. If a sidecar change made an old ACPX record unreadable, session start fails as any failed resume does. It does not corrupt state, and the run follows its normal recovery policy. - The sweep now keeps locks for a failed native run with a scheduled resume. If that resume can never be claimed (for example the agent stays paused), the task keeps the lock until the coordinator settles or the task closes. Before, the sweep cleared it, and the resume still never ran. - If another run holds the task's lock, a scheduled remote resume still stays blocked and the coordinator stays `retryable_failure`. This change does not settle that case. It needs a separate decision about superseding the resume. - `native_provider_state_incompatible` is a new failure code. No UI or migration change is needed. Older servers never see it. - No schema migration. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs). The runtime does not expose the context window or reasoning configuration. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 16:30:58 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip	683fa4725e	fix(evals): refresh native runtime and pin reviewed catalog repairs (#18780 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people inspect and manage their agents’ work. > - The timeline must report canonical ownership history, and OpenCode tool failures need bounded diagnostics. > - The measured candidate also had independently reproduced question-navigation and oracle defects. > - This change promotes the reviewed production fixes and pins one immutable, qualified source composition. > - Original queries, model, counts, clocks, privacy controls and qualification holds remain intact. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18775, #18777, #18779, #18711, #18713, #18718, #18699, #18798, #18799. What happened? The measured candidate predates merged native-runtime fixes and contains fixture defects. The timeline omitted recorded reassignment/removal history. Finish-input errors lacked a closed correlation and shape witness. Expected behavior: project recorded ownership transitions without inventing facts, distinguish successful native execution from failed verification steps, and retain content-free finish diagnostics. Steps to reproduce: repeat an unchanged assignee while editing another field; then reassign or unassign it. Only recorded transitions should appear. Invalid OpenCode finish input should produce a correlated rejection witness without values or schema text. Related #18699 adds gated company OTLP diagnostics. This change uses the existing local callback; it adds no exporter or capture policy. ## What Changed - Promote canonical timeline creation, reassignment and removal projection from #18777. Initial child ownership requires a recorded fresh-creation receipt; delegation requires a readable recorded parent. Unknown legacy facts fail closed. User actors/owners require active company membership; agent actors/targets must exist in that company. Spans, events and edges share that admission filter. Remove the introduced all-history absence query and use guarded indexed UUID lookups. - Add the shared/OpenAPI `unassigned` event kind, preserving newer main contracts and issue-route/service code through reviewed semantic joins. Existing UI consumers remain generic; no new visual marker is claimed. - Add bounded OpenCode finish diagnostics: schema digest, hashed call identity, closed shape enums and validation category. A throwing sink does not change admission or cancellation. - Pin immutable candidate `fd5e3b1e5a379524c0d1651ed8273e75ffd86541`, composed from combined #18777 source `b734393eff0d7ef85b7ad8abd556d2a66ca3a4e6` plus the reviewed MCP diagnostic delta. It preserves actually merged #18775 `97c07d149b5670088faf15317dcf603c75e2af87` and #18779 `a352c057d475067b4fe67375f06785287dfbe0ce`, and merged runtime fixes #18711, #18713 and #18718. - Qualify narrative handling for adjacent repair/verification sentences, intervening native-failure wording, and negated repair objects. Questions, denials and hypotheticals retain their controls. Preserve Previous question beside the qualified Entity type import; separately restore the already-called `internalResultLink` goal helper binding. That import is a runtime fixture repair, not a type-only change. - Include the narrow older-baseline CI typecheck closure and causal heartbeat test observers in the candidate. All four default typecheck projects execute. Main already includes the protected upstream tooling and newer heartbeat fixture, so neither is overwritten with an older candidate file. - Preserve all 244 identities, original queries, model, native/human counts and clocks, including the explicit prior Studio accounting exception. The full catalog stays on its candidate branch; the 196/244 gate and historical SDK runtime holds remain. ## Verification The primary’s f478 retry repeated the real composer-hidden five-second assertion (1 failure,18 passes,1 skip). Investigation established a setup readiness gap: an outer route response can delay mounting the chat thread beyond the assertion. The successor adds the existing real-thread `aria-busy="false"` readiness barrier before the unchanged composer assertion. The original120-second scenario and digest, unread, source-link, history, and reply checks are unchanged. The full owning browser scenario passed naturally in10.2s and with its first real chat response held6000ms in12.0s. This synchronizes fixture setup; the underlying AWS late-mount latency remains unproved. Current main gates passed: exact head `823dab49fcd8470140c178771e5c0c6b78725e97` has [successful normal CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41724620555), including both required aggregates, fresh Greptile 5/5 and zero unresolved review threads. Paperclip Review is neutral with a completed substantive 5/5 and no actionable defect. The current optional Superagent Security Scan is neutral/inconclusive: Security Graph context retrieval returned HTTP503, so its assessment did not start. That result supplies no security PASS credit. The primary source PR retains its separate current-head gate before Root sequences normal protected merges. - Reviewed MCP controls: 130 on main and 129 on the older candidate. Meaningful parent comparisons failed before implementation/correlation correction. Controls cover actual offered schema identity, null/omitted admission, bounded rejection categories and throwing-sink cancellation. - Exact unchanged production postimages retain 63 Postgres/public-route controls, nine plan controls and the focused index-plan proof. Owner OpenAPI passes 32 controls; main’s newer contract passes 33. Earlier setup/sandbox failures remain recorded; unchanged database controls were not replayed. - Narrative owner controls pass 216, retaining all prior 207 controls. The independent peer passes 144 balanced cases; earlier 108 and 39-case matrices remain retained. Actual consumer parent failures reproduced the review findings before repair. - Main’s server NoEmit passed on its protected baseline; only two pin files changed afterward. The candidate’s prior full server and four-project checks passed. All server/package/script/root-lock inputs remain byte-identical; the changed Runner project’s guard passes on the current source. Compatibility driver controls pass 47 and six owning suites pass 82. The one explicitly reviewed Docker-only unit omission concerns an unimported image-build feature; all four intended project guards still execute. - Pin/adapter/contract controls pass 47. All 242 expanded declarations, the two legacy dispatch rows, and all 244 singleton private policies retain their authenticated identities. Descriptor, launcher and private-protocol bytes remain exact; declaration loading invoked zero fixture callbacks. - All 506 SDK input blobs match the meaningfully compiled `6abe5739` source vector. Prior real shared/SDK builds measured declaration/map changes and zero runtime-JavaScript changes; a compiled consumer accepts the new kind and rejects an unknown kind. The reviewed registry remains unchanged. Default source proof, 51 SDK controls, 20 custody controls and 16 UI consumer controls remain qualified; runtime/compiler/parser/Zod/canary pins and held runtime grades are unchanged. - The full Mac heartbeat run on prior observer source retained 58 passes / six failures in 802.78s. Two nonassignee controls subsequently pass focused checks. Four late timeout causes remain unresolved locally; no flakiness/infrastructure cause or complete local pass is claimed. [Actual AWS CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41712023737/job/126182620050) ran this exact heartbeat file with 64 passes in 107.209s. Its server/package inputs are unchanged in the current narrative-only successor. The source-identical f478 heartbeat file also passed all64 AWS tests in105.812s; source inputs remain unchanged. Current main ordinary CI passed; the primary source PR must independently close its latest-head ordinary CI gate. - Historical main [run 41713049555](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41713049555) recorded six synchronized runner-shutdown failures and cancellations; the shutdown cause is unknown. A separate chat passive-control assertion observed one `db.transaction` call where zero was expected. Finite local probes passed 2+2 but did not establish a cause or late stack. No external publication, cleanup cause, source fix or flakiness is inferred. The primary’s separate composer-visibility CI failure also remains an inconclusive historical result; no guessed fix is credited. No old-head retry was used. - Earlier UI/inbox fixture failures and the CLI startup timeout remain historical. UI/inbox repairs are now upstream in #18799/#18798 and main preserves those files verbatim. The CLI timeout cause remains unknown. Broader local repository/Rust qualification is not claimed; fresh hosted CI supplies broader coverage. - All four actual repair merges, an exact merged-tree/diagnostic source join, and fresh controller/source/private-policy/active-run guards precede the ten-case TestOps measurement. No paid or model eval was launched for this PR; the original three passes/seven failures remain unchanged. ## Risks The next ten-case model result is unproved. Earlier MCP timeout and continuation-shape causes remain unknown; diagnostics provide future evidence without relaxing validation or rewriting grades. Prior local/CI failures are retained, including the unresolved chat assertion and local heartbeat timeouts. Initial ownership requires canonical in-window audit facts. Missing legacy facts remain unknown. The additive `unassigned` contract is synchronized across shared/OpenAPI/server consumers, with no new UI marker. SDK runtime holds and the broader 196/244 qualification gate remain. Normal protected merges require fresh checks and resolved feedback; no CODEOWNER or branch-protection bypass is authorized here. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex. Capabilities used: repository analysis, code changes, source validation, and local test execution. The context-window size is not exposed by this harness. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — current focused/type/pin controls pass; the prior full Mac heartbeat failures remain disclosed and receive no local PASS credit - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — current main normal CI and required aggregates passed; optional neutral reviews and separate primary gate are disclosed above - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups — exact current main head; full thread pagination verified - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 16:17:51 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	451d06e2fc	fix: resume interrupted Runner preparation and confirm failure report delivery (#18853 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The server owns run recovery and task continuation after a restart. > - A shutdown can interrupt Runner preparation before any provider work starts. > - Workspace recovery can save the files but leave that task behind a legacy execution hold. > - Retry then accepts a request without starting a successor. Startup also leaves the task blocked. > - This pull request verifies the interrupted preparation, preserves its files, and admits one bounded continuation. > - It also keeps a dropped Sentry capture eligible for a later report. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A hosted task remained blocked after a graceful server shutdown interrupted Runner preparation. Its remote workspace was recovered. Retry returned an accepted request, but no successor started. Startup did not resume it. The task also had no matching Sentry event. The recovery cause is verified. The exact cause of the missing historical Sentry event is unknown. A separate regression with the real Sentry SDK proves that processing backpressure can drop a capture while the task cache marks it as reported forever. Expected behavior Retry must continue eligible interrupted work from its saved workspace. Startup must schedule one bounded retry when durable evidence proves that no provider started. A later task read must be able to retry an unconfirmed Sentry report. Steps to reproduce 1. Interrupt Runner preparation during a server shutdown before native runtime selection. 2. Retain and recover its remote workspace under the legacy recovery hold. 3. Press Retry, or restart after file recovery has completed. 4. Observe that the task remains blocked without a successor. For the reporting case, hold the first Sentry event in its asynchronous enrichment step. Fill the SDK processing buffer. Capture a second task failure, release the first event, and read the second failed task again later. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced against source commit `4d31588dea`. The hosted incident served `6ef37398c8d799c5142a3a6590ecc70ad352b663`. Deployment mode Hosted Linux server with remote workspaces and external PostgreSQL. Local regressions use the source checkout on macOS arm64, Node 26.4.0, PostgreSQL 17.10, and the audited optional Sentry SDK 10.71.0. Related public changes: #18541 added task-state failure reports. #18678 retained remote exports before Retry. #18803 fenced remote workspace writers before continuation. The small backend-port fixture correction follows #18739. It is included here because the same existing setup defect blocked CI. ## What Changed - Verify pre-native shutdown interruption against the immutable adapter claim, controller ownership, run events, native records, stopped leases, and exact workspace recovery receipts. - Retire only the server's unchanged bootstrap failure block. Admit explicit Retry through the existing continuation path. - Discover completed workspace recovery at startup and schedule one retry under the existing failure budget. Let saved input own its continuation. - Apply the existing safe replacement dispatch checks to preparation retries. A later human block, competing execution, dependency, pause, approval, or budget gate must still prevent dispatch. - Keep execution evidence available through the bounded run projection. - Confirm Sentry task-report delivery from a successful SDK HTTP response. Keep unconfirmed captures pending for 60 seconds before a later task read can retry them. Both caches remain bounded and start no timer. - Document recovery and report delivery semantics. - Align existing handoff/budget assertions with the guarded preparation retry reason. Keep the owned-runtime fixture outside reserved proxy ports, with bounded allocation attempts. ## Verification - Red before the recovery fix: all three new Retry/startup cases failed because no successor was created. Green after the fix: all three passed with real saved workspace archives and PostgreSQL. - The pre-merge revision passes all 384 tests in the six affected recovery, run-control, run-state, retry, and dispatch suites. - The late-block regression failed before its repair. Its four focused recovery/dispatch cases then passed, including final dispatch cancellation. - Review found a second stop check that still rejected verified local and lease-free preparation. Both new cases failed before that repair. All 17 interrupted-preparation regressions passed on the pre-merge revision. - The Sentry regression failed with the real SDK before the fix. All 91 affected reporting tests then passed. The transport stays in memory. No test sends events to Sentry. - Full repository typecheck passed with `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`. The full `pnpm build` and module boundary check passed. - CI found untyped delivery-hook parameters when the optional Sentry SDK was absent. Explicit callback types fix that build. The SDK-absent server build and all 91 SDK-present reporting tests pass. - Server typecheck passes with the SDK installed and the real Sentry SDK contract CI job passes. Greptile reviewed the pre-merge commit `103e175c44` at 5/5 with no open findings. - The local full-suite attempt initially overlapped the rebase and stopped at test-line selection. Its unchanged-head rerun passed the first 309-test chat shard. I stopped the old-head run before applying review fixes. Current-head CI owns the remaining full-suite verification. - CI exposed two old retry-reason expectations. The handoff and retry-budget checks pass with the new guarded reason. A separate existing process-adoption fixture chose port 42953 in the reserved 42000–42999 proxy range. The fixture now rejects reserved ports, following #18739. Its real process/adoption/termination test passes locally. - The final Runner package job [initially failed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41718507919/job/126205912033) one unchanged Codex credential case after it could not acquire its port quorum, then timed out. The complete unchanged 42-case credential suite passes locally. One unchanged CI retry passed; the original competing port owner was not identified. No Runner implementation or credential test was changed. - Required CI passes on `103e175c4490e1bdf804c64a8635b0e4568545ae`, including `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`. That revision has Greptile 5/5 with no open findings. The optional Paperclip Review check on that earlier head remained queued, waiting for its assigned agent. - Merged current `master` without replacing published commits. The retry gate retains both shutdown interruption checks and the new workspace preparation timeout policy. All 311 tests in the five combined recovery, retry scheduling, completion, and native startup suites passed after the conflict resolution. Server typecheck passed. Final head `005d380b00d45a2393c4a2a190eab27611168d3c` includes the next conflict-free master update. All 17 interrupted-preparation regressions passed again on that final head. Greptile reviewed that exact head at 5/5 with no new findings. Required CI passes on that exact head, including `ci / verify`, `ci / e2e`, typecheck, build, the full test shards, and the real Sentry SDK isolation check. The optional Paperclip Review remains queued, waiting for its assigned agent; it is not a required branch check. - On the final head, six test jobs were cancelled after their spot runners received shutdown signals at the same time. Another server shard passed 2,419 tests, but its unchanged 103-record cleanup backlog case exceeded the 15-second limit. The unchanged full cleanup suite then passed all 29 tests locally. One unchanged retry of only the seven unsuccessful jobs passed. The [original cancellation and timeout logs](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41724898038/attempts/1) remain in the workflow history. No cleanup implementation or test was changed. - The signed-in hosted UI reproduced the failed Retry before the fix. The fixed path is covered through the real HTTP Retry route and assembled heartbeat/recovery services. This PR has not been deployed to the hosted incident. A live repaired Retry remains unverified until rollout. ## Risks - Automatic continuation must not repeat provider work. It requires positive preparation evidence and rejects retained provider, process-launch, coordinator, result, live-controller, unsafe lease, or mismatched workspace evidence. - Repeated recovery calls must create one successor. Tests cover concurrent requests, repeated startup visits, pending Retry, retry exhaustion, and changed task ownership. - Sentry delivery state stays local to the process. A restart or cache eviction can report a failure again. An unconfirmed event needs a later task read to retry. - No schema or API contract changes are required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. This session does not expose a more specific deployment ID or context window size. Reasoning, code editing, test execution, and browser diagnostics assisted the change. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 16:10:49 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	2920d88034	fix: preserve cancelled runs through native finalization (#18857 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents that do work. > - Native runs can accept a result before workspace file finalization ends. > - A user can Stop the run while file finalization is still pending. > - The direct finalizer replaced that cancelled run with the earlier provider status. > - The restart projection already preserves a cancelled run. > - This pull request preserves cancellation in the direct projection too. > - Saved results and normal task decisions remain available. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? An accepted successful result can wait for workspace finalization. If run-only Stop completes first, the run and its source wake become cancelled. Late finalization then changed the run to succeeded, cleared the cancellation error, and replaced its finish time. The wake remained cancelled. Expected behavior Preserve the winning run cancellation, finish time, errors and audited acknowledgement. Keep the accepted provider result and complete file finalization. The server task arbiter still decides task status from the accepted result. A valid result can finish the task even though the execution was stopped. Steps to reproduce Accept a native result through the control-plane port. Hold an actual workspace-finalization operation. Stop the run through the heartbeat service with a board request identity. Release the operation and call the direct finalizer. The new database regression exercises this sequence. Related work: #18804 settles exact claimed native wakes. This change preserves a wake that Stop already cancelled. #15212 and #12301 address the opposite race in legacy cancellation. They do not change this native finalizer projection. ## What Changed - Evaluate run status and errors against the current locked database row. Preserve a cancelled run when a late accepted result finishes finalization or when workspace/status-decision retries exhaust. Merge finalization failure metadata into the current row so concurrent receipts survive. - Keep finalization receipts and accepted results. Preserve existing server task-arbiter behavior and accounting fields. - Add real database tests for successful and failed accepted results, delayed workspace work, and Stop after the task decision but before run projection. - Check cancelled wakes, audited acknowledgement, no successor, restart projection and idle recovery. Update execution documentation. ## Verification - Before the production change, the actual producer sequence failed: the cancelled run became succeeded, its error code became null, and its finish time advanced. This failure remains saved privately. - The focused projection, cancellation-request and Stop-accounting suites pass all 67 tests. These include the same delayed-finalization sequence, both task status orderings, and complete and late accounting receipts without another provider turn. - Independent review found a second terminal writer in retry exhaustion. On the unchanged previous head, two real database cases changed a cancelled run to failed or succeeded after workspace or status-decision retries. A third case let actual board Stop win after the permanent workspace failure admission snapshot and still changed cancelled to failed. All three now pass. Existing uncancelled exhaustion controls still pass. No mock supplied the canonical cancellation state. - Initial review found that routine regression notes do not belong in the feature maps. Both map additions were removed. Production and test code are unchanged by that correction. - Runner TypeScript build and all server typecheck layers pass. Map, module-boundary and diff checks pass. - An additional direct typecheck of the normally excluded projection fixture reports two existing notification mocks whose transaction parameter is typed as `object`. The same check with the previous test file reports the same two errors. The new regression cases add no type errors. The standard server typecheck remains green. - The previous head passed required CI after one targeted retry of jobs that received the same runner shutdown signal. Those original failures remain recorded. The exhaustion correction passes fresh required CI on exact head `84404d34b9d982d8bca24b63ae2046051f5169b8` (workflow 41726120483, attempt 1). Both required aggregate gates pass. Greptile reviewed this head at 5/5 with no new comments; all review threads are resolved. An independent source review found no blocking issue in the correction. Runner TypeScript and all server typecheck layers pass locally; the exact production server and Runner build passes with the server stamp bound to `84404d34b9d982d8bca24b63ae2046051f5169b8`. The full required CI workflow passes. - This is local fixture evidence. It does not establish hosted recovery, a remote provider stop, or a deployed version. ## Risks - Accepted result finalization can still finish the task after run-only Stop. This is existing server policy; cancelled run API write authority stays revoked. - The fix protects cancelled execution history. It does not invent provider termination, saved-file or accounting proof. - No schema, endpoint, retry budget, provider call or new background worker changes. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, Extra High reasoning. The model used code execution, repository tools and test output. The host does not expose the context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 16:10:21 -06:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	b0c4e34526	fix(native): resume from the owner after an unstarted failed follow-up (#18860 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native Runner sessions keep one conversation across task turns. > - A follow-up turn resumes from the newest earlier run that holds a provider checkpoint. > - A follow-up can fail during admission, before provider work, and still hold the checkpoint that it inherited. > - A later Retry then resumes from that failed run. Controller recovery finds no controller checkpoint there and fails. > - This pull request makes resume source selection skip a failed follow-up that proves that it never started provider work. > - The benefit is that a board Retry resumes from the last committed owner, and the task can continue. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18846, which lets a follow-up start after a recovered per-turn owner. Refs #18854 (same-run retry of failures before provider work) and #18718 (controller projection refresh). What happened? Run 1 was a per-turn remote sandbox run. Recovery committed its result, but it saved no Runner suspension receipt. Run 2 was a follow-up that was admitted before #18846. Admission failed with `runner_state_identity_mismatch: prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`, before any provider work. Run 2 has these properties: - Status `failed`, and the result has `executionRecovery: { kind: "bootstrap", providerWorkStarted: false }`. - The coordinator is `terminal_failure`, with no result, no lease owner, and no controller process. - No controller checkpoint rows and no controller recovery pointer. - A `sessionCheckpoint` bound to run 2 with a null cursor. The provider session in it is copied from run 1. A board Retry then started run 3. Resume source selection treats any checkpoint as a progress barrier, so it selected run 2. Controller recovery then failed with `native_controller_recovery_unsupported:metadata_format`, because run 2 has no controller recovery pointer. The task stayed blocked. Every later Retry selects the newest failed follow-up and fails the same way. Expected behavior A Retry must resume from the last committed owner (run 1) when the newer follow-up provably never started provider work. If the follow-up might have started provider work, or holds its own controller evidence, it must stay the source. Steps to reproduce 1. Commit a per-turn remote owner through recovery, without a suspension receipt. 2. Admit a follow-up, and make its admission fail with `prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`. 3. Settle that follow-up as a failed bootstrap: `providerWorkStarted: false`, `terminal_failure`, and no result. 4. Admit a Retry. It selects the failed follow-up and fails with `native_controller_recovery_unsupported:metadata_format`. The new regression test runs these steps against PostgreSQL. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on `909d86b59a`. Deployment mode Native Runner with a per-turn lifecycle on the built-in remote sandbox transport. Source selection is shared by all native providers. ## What Changed - `findNativeSessionResumeRun` skips a newest barrier that is an unstarted inherited follow-up and selects again without it. The selector repeats this inside the existing 32-run window. - A run is skipped only when all of these are true: - It is a native run with status `failed` and a `bootstrap` receipt with `providerWorkStarted: false`. - Its coordinator is `terminal_failure`, with no result, lease owner, or controller process. - It has no process identity, provider event, controller checkpoint row, run result row, or controller recovery pointer. - Its checkpoint is bound to this run and session, and it has no cursor. - After the skips, every skipped run must name the same backend, driver, and provider session as the selected source. Otherwise the selector returns the original barrier. - Runtime selection and controller recovery both call this selector. Both now use the committed owner. Admission then reaches the #18846 path, which retires the old authority and starts a new Runner. - Add four cases to `native-recovered-owner-followup.test.ts`, with one negative control for each guard. - Document the rule in `doc/execution-semantics.md` and the test in `doc/testing-native-remote-continuity.md`. ### Why source selection - Source selection made the wrong choice. The failed follow-up has no provider progress. Its checkpoint is a copy, and the provider never saw its turn. - One shared selector feeds runtime selection (checkpoint rebind, previous turn, runner instance) and controller recovery. A fix in only one of them would let them disagree about the source. - Controller recovery keeps its rule: it never searches backward when the selected run is incomplete. The selector skips a run only with positive proof, so an incomplete run with any evidence of work still stops recovery. - A fix in the executor could not help. The executor sees only the source that the selector gives it. ## Verification - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-recovered-owner-followup.test.ts`: 22 tests pass. - Before the change, the two new retry tests failed with `native_controller_recovery_unsupported:metadata_format`. - After the change, the retry selects the committed owner and is admitted. It is also admitted after two failed follow-ups. - Eight controls keep the failed follow-up as the source: process identity, provider event, controller checkpoint row, a receipt with `providerWorkStarted: true`, a coordinator with a controller process, a run result row, a different provider session, and a non-null cursor. - I disabled each guard in turn. Each change made its matching control fail. - These suites pass: native session resume, resume projection, controller recovery (unit and integration), native startup retry, runtime selection, execution workspace service, native status corpus, task workspace binding, and all 1,088 native executor tests. The container and Runner binary cases skip locally. - Server typecheck, `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`, `pnpm check:module-boundaries`, and `git diff --check` pass. - I did not run the full `pnpm test:run`, `pnpm build`, or the opt-in Linux Runner container cases locally. CI runs them. - The tests start at the selector and executor admission. They do not exercise the Retry route, the task retry queue, or a live sandbox provider. ## Risks - A wrong skip could resume from an older checkpoint. Each guard requires positive evidence of no provider work. A skipped run must also name the same provider session as the selected source. If any check fails, the selector returns the original barrier. - Only `failed` runs qualify. Cancelled, interrupted, and timed-out runs keep their existing handling. - The skip adds one proof query per candidate. It runs only when the newest barrier is a failed native run whose checkpoint is bound to itself and has no cursor. - The rebind now uses the owner's tool-contract fingerprint. If the tool contract changed since the owner ran, the Retry starts a new provider session. The provider history in this failure mode is already unavailable. - No migration or configuration change is required. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (model ID `claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with extended thinking, repository tools, shell and code execution, and local test runs. The runtime does not expose the context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 14:02:36 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip	a80eec1164	fix(recovery): continue Retry after completed file preservation (#18845 ) Reuse completed file preservation for task Retry and show bounded admission explanations, including newer saved messages and identifier routes. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 16:01:27 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	0a1e4c3d0f	fix(workspaces): retry pristine remote setup timeouts (#18852 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A remote task needs a workspace before its model can start. > - Fresh workspace preparation can reach its transport deadline. > - Failure handling records that timeout as a generic setup failure and stops the task. > - An unpublished workspace has no saved task work to repeat. > - This change routes that narrow failure through the existing bounded retry scheduler. > - Saved work, retained executions, and normal admission gates keep their existing protection. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18827, which preserves remote timeout diagnostics. This change builds on that merged repair. Related #16727 concerns controller-managed clones and optional partial clones; this change keeps remote clone contents and deadlines unchanged. What happened? A fresh remote workspace reached its 300-second command limit before model execution. The task then stopped with `setup_failed` and no scheduled continuation. A separate full clone completed in 137 seconds on a disposable Daytona sandbox. The original delay remains unexplained. This change repairs the missing recovery path; it does not claim to remove the underlying delay. Expected behavior A fresh, unpublished workspace preparation timeout can use the existing two automatic retries. Retry scheduling remains durable and company scoped. Stop, pause, dependencies, budgets, task ownership, saved work, and retained native execution must still prevent unsafe work. Steps to reproduce 1. Start preparation for a fresh remote workspace with no saved version or published allocation. 2. Make its initial directory/clone command return a transport timeout. 3. Observe that the base code records a generic setup failure without bounded recovery. 4. With this change, the owner validates current workspace authority and preserves a specific bootstrap failure for the normal retry scheduler. Paperclip version or commit Base: `e0276e0166`, including #18827. Deployment mode Native Paperclip Runner with sandbox workspace storage. Verification uses real PostgreSQL, filesystem commands, and a separate live Daytona transport probe. ## What Changed - Recognize only the initial preparation timeout while the same company, writer, and epoch still own a pristine workspace. - Keep restore, additional repository, provisioning, save, changed ownership, dirty workspace, and retained native execution failures outside this recovery policy. - Persist the typed failure before using the existing retry scheduler, admission gates, and attempt budget. - After successful terminal lease cleanup, reclaim an unpublished bootstrap-only reservation even when a provider returns no stop receipt. Preserve receipt requirements for saved/published work, unknown execution, and native identities; do not synthesize termination evidence. - Prevent generic recovery from granting another budget after exhaustion. Keep a specific recovery notice. - Add regressions for persistence, concurrent scheduling, restart, exhaustion, Stop, pause, dependencies, fresh allocation, lost replies, and saved output after cold restoration. - Document the recovery contract. ## Verification - Red: the real-PostgreSQL workspace regression first failed because the timeout had no recovery classification. The completion regression then failed because it became `setup_failed`. A retained-native negative failed before the admission guard. The review follow-up reproduced a failed successor reservation after production lease release returned void. - Green: all 127 transport/archive/real-PostgreSQL workspace cases pass after the review repair. All 12 receipt/void handoff cases pass against the final query. The 141 complete completion/retry/recovery cases and the fresh-allocation selection case pass. Safety cases cover concurrent scheduling across restart, the two-attempt cap, Stop/pause/dependency gates, native identities, saved/published files, active leases, failed cleanup, and cold-restored output. - `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs` and `pnpm build` pass at `ba96cff771707415e4a5e893c8b3a97499ead25b`. `git diff --check` and the module-boundary check pass. The full local test wrapper completed all 1,835 chat cases across six partitions, then was interrupted during its serial general-server phase after the complete current-head CI suite passed. Its interrupted run is not a full local-suite pass; its log is retained. The owned process tree and database children exited. - The [complete GitHub Actions run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41718108375) is successful at this exact head, including all server/workspace/chat partitions, all nine serialized groups, all eight browser shards, build, typecheck, native Runner, package, Rust, and release-policy checks. The first Rust worker shut down during cache restore before tests; one retry passed without source changes. Expected Storybook skips remain skips. - Earlier failures remain accounted for: the first typecheck found two incomplete process-result fixtures, now corrected. An intermediate completion run exposed a test double that returned no promise and a teardown timeout; the complete 141-case suites subsequently passed. The first-head CI had four worker shutdowns and one worker communication loss. A three-second monitor settlement wait failed in CI and locally, then all 21 cases passed unchanged at base and head. An earlier CI retry found a real-process history adoption assertion failure; that exact case passed locally at base and head. Both server groups pass in final-head CI. These timing causes remain unknown. [Earlier CI evidence](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41713712522). - Live supporting evidence: unchanged production preparation code completed a full repository clone in 137 seconds using Daytona SDK 0.203.0, Node 24.22.2, Git 2.39.5, and Linux x86_64, with 1 CPU, 1 GiB memory, and 1 GiB disk. The approved diagnostic account could not access the original fleet snapshot, so the probe used public `node:24-bookworm`. Both probe allocations were deleted and absence verified. Full task acceptance at the fixed revision remains unverified: the original fleet snapshot and an explicitly configured disposable Codex subscription fixture were unavailable. No CLI login or hosted subscription was copied. - Greptile is 5/5 at the final head with no actionable findings. The Paperclip review finding is repaired, replied to, and resolved. The separate Paperclip Review check remains queued. Its task failed workspace export after publishing the first assessment; the staging service was then observed showing a workspace recovery page after an update failure. Subsequent browser rechecks timed out, including a fresh tab, so the normal recovery control could not be used. Reconcile that existing export after service access returns, then let the saved current-head review request run. That external review is the remaining check; this PR is not yet fully green. - The original hosted task was last verified blocked. This PR has not been deployed and the task has not been retried by this work. Reviewers can run `pnpm test:run`, `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`, and `pnpm build`. The remote-workspace integration suite additionally needs an owned disposable PostgreSQL database named `remote_workspace_*test` through `PAPERCLIP_REMOTE_WORKSPACE_TEST_DATABASE_URL`; otherwise that suite is skipped. ## Risks Each retry keeps the existing preparation deadline, so persistent slow clones can consume the bounded budget before intervention. A retry receives fresh allocation admission; it does not replay the command against the old allocation. The workspace owner checks persisted authority before classifying the failure, and normal admission still rechecks that authority. Historical generic setup failures do not gain automatic replay. No database migration, provider-pack update, model fallback, credential change, or deployment is included. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser tools. The host does not expose a more specific serving model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 15:36:07 -06:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	909d86b59a	fix(native): retry runs that fail before provider work (#18854 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native runs start the provider through Runner. `session.open` starts the provider session before any prompt. > - When `session.open` fails, the server records the generic `native_session_interrupted`. Recovery evidence then reports `ambiguous_state`, so the first failure blocks the task with no automatic retry. > - The failure is often temporary. On one instance an agent's provider account hit its usage limit. For about 14 hours every later run failed at `session.open`, and 47 tasks stayed blocked. Outside limit windows, the same error also occurs once and a later retry succeeds. > - The server already has a bounded same-run bootstrap retry for failures that are proven to come before provider work. It did not recognize this failure, and it did not consider a known provider limit. > - This pull request classifies a definite `session.open` failure as a pre-session failure. Bootstrap retries back off and wait out a known provider limit. The task is blocked only after the shared budget is used, with a clear reason. > - The benefit is that a temporary startup failure or a provider limit no longer strands tasks on the first failure, and every existing replay guard stays in force. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18847. That pull request keeps the provider cause on `session.open` rejections and names typed categories (for example `classification=provider_rate_limit`). This change does not depend on it. With #18847, a typed limit at `session.open` uses the same cooldown path, because the server reads the cause with `providerFailureFromError`. Refs #18622, which added the `ProviderFailure` cause. Refs #13993, an open change about legacy adapter startup backoff; it does not touch the native recovery path. What happened? A native run (`paperclip_runner`) failed at `session.open` before any prompt: `ACPX sidecar command session.open was rejected (retryable=false, classification=session_ensure_failed)`. The server recorded `native_session_interrupted`. Recovery evidence had no checkpoint and no provider event, but the cause was not in the pre-session list, so the mode was `ambiguous_state`. The coordinator went to `terminal_failure`, a board-owned `active_run_watchdog` action was created, and the task was set to `blocked` on the first failure. During a provider usage limit, every later run of the agent failed the same way, so each task was blocked. Expected behavior A run that provably failed before provider work retries automatically, with backoff and a bounded budget. If the agent has a known provider limit, the retry waits for the cooldown. The task is blocked only when the budget is used, and the recovery action explains why. A run where provider work may have started is never replayed. Steps to reproduce 1. Make Runner reject `session.open` for a native run (for example a provider at its usage limit). 2. Observe the coordinator: `terminal_failure`, `recoveryMode: "ambiguous_state"`, `providerSessionEstablished: false`. The task is `blocked`. 3. The new `native-startup-retry.integration.test.ts` reproduces this with a real database and the executor. Paperclip version or commit `master` at `5877d751c0e`. Deployment mode Native Runner with an ACPX Claude provider. The fix is in the server and is not specific to one deployment mode. ## What Changed - `nativeSessionFailureSourceCode` returns a new cause, `provider_session_open_rejected`, when Runner reports that `session.open` failed or was rejected. Those outcomes are definite, and the command runs before any prompt. An `indeterminate` outcome stays `native_session_interrupted`. Earlier, more specific causes (for example a missing runtime package) keep their classification. - `nativeProviderRecoveryEvidence` treats the new cause as pre-session. The durable evidence still decides. A bootstrap retry happens only with no provider session, no provider event and no checkpoint. Otherwise the mode stays `ambiguous_state` and the task is blocked as before. - New module `native-runtime/native-startup-retry.ts` plans each bootstrap retry. It is called only for `bootstrap_retry` mode. - Backoff: the existing `infrastructureRetryDelayMs` (about 30 s, then about 60 s, plus or minus 20 %). The jitter derives from the run and attempt, and it is persisted with `nextAttemptAt`. - Limit cooldown: evidence is a `rate_limit` or `quota_exhausted` provider failure on the current failure (the #18847 shape), or on an agent run that started in the last 24 hours. A `native_provider_usage_limit` or `provider_quota` error code also counts. The cooldown is the provider's `retryAt` (or `retryNotBefore`), or one hour after the failure when no reset time is known. A later successful run of the agent clears older evidence. The cooldown is capped at 24 hours. The retry runs after the cooldown plus the backoff delay. - A failed evidence read is logged and falls back to plain backoff, so it cannot stop the failure from settling. - The budget does not change: three provider attempts, shared with checkpoint resumes and replacements. When it is used, the coordinator records `native_session_retry_exhausted`. The task is blocked, and the board-owned action says: "Provider startup failed on 3 attempts before any provider work began. Automatic retries are stopped." When a limit is known, the message includes the expected reset time. - While a retry waits, the coordinator detail, the recovery action evidence and the scheduled wake record `providerCooldownAt`. The next action names the reset time, and the task projection shows "Retry scheduled". - `PROVIDER_LIMIT_DEFAULT_COOLDOWN_MS` (one hour) moves to `system-recovery-state.ts`. The legacy provider-quota recovery default now refers to it. The value does not change. - A chat retry of an exhausted `provider_session_open_rejected` run is accepted like the other pre-provider causes. The existing proofs still apply. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the backoff, the cooldown and the exhausted state. ## Verification - Red: before the fix, the first new integration case failed. The coordinator was `terminal_failure` with `recoveryMode: "ambiguous_state"`, `originalFailureCode: "native_session_interrupted"` and `providerSessionEstablished: false`, and the task was `blocked`. Four more cases failed the same way. The two never-retry cases passed before and after the fix. - Green: `npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-startup-retry.integration.test.ts` in `server` (embedded PostgreSQL, the real executor, and the real resume claim). 8 cases pass: - a rejected `session.open` is retried with backoff (attempt 1 in 24 to 36 s, attempt 2 in 48 to 72 s), and the task stays `in_progress` with an agent-owned action and a `resume_native_run` wake; - after three attempts the task is blocked, the action is board-owned with the clear reason, and the resume claim refuses another attempt; - a recent limit failure holds the retry until one hour after that failure, and the claim refuses it before the cooldown; - a provider reset time from an earlier run, or from the startup failure itself, sets the cooldown; - a distant reset time holds the retry for at most one day; - a later success, another agent's limit, and an expired limit do not delay the retry; - a durable provider event, or an indeterminate `session.open` outcome, still blocks the task with `ambiguous_state` and no retry. - `native-session-executor.test.ts`: all 1,087 tests pass, including a new classification case for `failed`, `rejected`, `indeterminate` and a different command. - `chat-channels.integration.test.ts -t "requires terminal-safe native ownership for an exact chat retry"`: 23 pass, including the new `session_open` case. That case fails without the list change. - Related suites pass: native session resumption, native provider failure, capacity and overload integration tests, provider failure classification, native status arbiter corpus, native restart recovery. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server` passes. `git diff --check` passes. - [GitHub CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41713988964) is green on head `32561aa335d`. This includes `ci / verify`, `ci / e2e`, typecheck, build, all server, chat and workspace groups, all serialized server suites, and all Runner checks, which run the native-runtime server tests. In the first attempt, eleven jobs stopped because their runners received a shutdown signal; no test reported a failure. A rerun of those jobs passed. - A local run of the whole `server/src/services/native-runtime` directory was stopped before completion because it runs serially for a long time. CI ran those files. - Runtime dependency: the new work is one indexed query (`company_id`, `agent_id`, `started_at`) with `LIMIT 20`. It runs only when a bootstrap retry is planned or exhausted, not on the normal path. No new timer or polling: the wait uses the existing persisted `nextAttemptAt` deadline and the existing resume dispatch. - Not verified: a live provider account at its usage limit, and a live remote sandbox that waits through a full cooldown. The full repository suite was not run locally; CI ran it. ## Risks - A task that waits for a cooldown stays `in_progress` with its execution lock, for up to one day. This is the existing same-run retry state. Stop, reassignment, pause and an explicit Retry keep their current behavior through the existing claim checks. - During the wait the failed run keeps its environment lease in the same way as any same-run retry. A remote lease with an unexported prepared workspace is retained by the orphaned-lease sweep until the retry runs. Other active leases of the failed run are released after the usual five minutes, and the retry acquires a new one. - A `rate_limit` failure without a reset time (for example a short HTTP 429) delays only startup-failure retries of that agent, by up to one hour. Normal runs are not delayed, and a later success clears the evidence. - A startup failure that needs user action (for example a sign-in failure) now uses two automatic retries, about 90 seconds in total, before the task is blocked. Before, it was blocked at once with an ambiguous reason. - The agent's other queued runs are not held during a cooldown. Each one fails at `session.open` without provider work and then waits for the same cooldown. An agent-wide admission hold has no clean extension point in the current queue, so it is not part of this change. - Re-arming consumed scheduled monitors is out of scope. This change makes it matter less: a run that consumed a monitor wake now retries itself on the same run. A monitor that a run consumed before its retry budget was used stays consumed. - No schema or API change. The new error code appears on runs and in run error codes. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code, with extended reasoning and tool use (shell, file editing, test execution). The host does not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 13:24:59 -08:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	80c308f872	fix(runner): admit follow-ups after recovered per-turn owners (#18846 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native Runner sessions keep one conversation across task turns. > - After a per-turn sandbox turn, the controller saves a Runner suspension receipt or a failover backup. > - A full sandbox disk can stop that save after the turn is complete. > - Recovery then commits the result, but the controller has no proof that the Runner suspended. > - Each follow-up rebuilds the old controller journal from the database and rejects it again. > - This pull request lets admission retire that old authority when the prior owner is provably finished. > - The benefit is that the task continues with its saved workspace and does not stay blocked. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18705 (checkpoint save on a full sandbox disk). Refs #18829, #18718 and #18343 (related admission and controller recovery). Refs #18811 (a related warm continuation wait). What happened? A per-turn native run in a remote sandbox finished its turn. The post-turn `harness_state.backup.persist` and `session.checkpoint.persist` steps failed because the sandbox disk was full. The controller got no Runner suspension receipt and no failover backup. Workspace recovery later saved the files. The run committed its result and ended as `succeeded`. A board comment then started a follow-up in a new sandbox. Admission failed after about two minutes with `runner_state_identity_mismatch: prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`. Execution recovery then blocked the task. The cause is in durable-root admission. `restorePerTurnRunnerdController` rebuilds the prior controller journal from the database checkpoint. `verifyPriorRunnerdStateForSessionScope` finds a terminal owner in the same scope with no suspended lifecycle and no retained warm owner. It returns `terminal_state_indeterminate`. Admission quarantines the root and fails. The database checkpoint does not change, so every later admission rebuilds the same journal and fails again. A board Retry after that failed follow-up does not repeat the same error. Runtime selection picks the failed follow-up as the resume source, because it carries an inherited provider checkpoint. Controller recovery then fails with `native_controller_recovery_unsupported:metadata_format`. The task stays blocked. This pull request prevents that failed follow-up. It does not change source selection (see Risks). Expected behavior When the prior owner is provably finished, the follow-up must start. It must keep the saved workspace. It must not start while the prior owner can still be alive, while terminal delivery or provider cleanup is unsettled, or while quarantine holds evidence from a different owner. Steps to reproduce 1. Complete a per-turn remote sandbox run. Commit its result through recovery and release its controller lease. 2. Keep its database controller checkpoint and recovery pointer. Do not save a suspension receipt or a failover backup. 3. Admit a follow-up in a new sandbox with no local controller projection. 4. Admission rebuilds the old journal, quarantines it, and fails with the error above. 5. Admit the same run again. It rebuilds the journal and fails the same way. The new regression test runs these steps against PostgreSQL. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on `e0276e0166`. Deployment mode Native Runner with a per-turn lifecycle, the built-in remote sandbox transport, and the ACPX provider. The admission path is the same for other per-turn sandbox providers. ## What Changed - Add `retireFinishedPerTurnRunnerdOwner` to durable-root admission in `native-session-executor.ts`. It runs only when the existing verifier returns `terminal_state_indeterminate`, and only without a restart claim or a retained warm owner. - The function requires all of these. Otherwise the existing quarantine and rejection apply. - Per-turn lifecycle on the built-in remote sandbox transport, with a `created` or `replacement` sandbox. A resumed sandbox, a warm session, and a plugin task keep their existing paths. - No local Runner lifecycle evidence for the old owner. The session root contains only known authority entries. - A journal for that owner with its terminal delivered and only idle goal snapshots after it. All commands are completed. Each tool input has a completed result. No warm transition or staged attachment exists. - A terminal prior run in the same task. Its coordinator is `committed` with a result, has no lease owner, and has no recovery state. - A stopped prior controller, from `evaluateNativeControllerTakeover` with `requireStoppedController`. A durable controller is fenced by its released database lease, as in remote warm recovery. - Each quarantined root for the scope passes the same journal and local Runner evidence checks for the same owner. A retry rebuilds only the database journal, so quarantined Runner evidence must stay decisive. - When the proof holds, the function reads the journal again, moves the old authority into `continuity-breaks/<time>-<uuid>` in the session root, and logs one line. The follow-up then starts a new Runner authority. The provider session follows the existing resume-or-replace policy. - Share the list of continuity archive entries with provider replacement (`archiveContinuityState`). Provider replacement behavior does not change. - Add `native-recovered-owner-followup.test.ts`. It uses real PostgreSQL, a real encrypted controller checkpoint, and the production source selector and checkpoint rebinder. - Document the rule in `doc/execution-semantics.md` and the test in `doc/testing-native-remote-continuity.md`. ### Design choice I considered two approaches: 1. Start a new Runner authority for the scope at admission (this pull request). 2. Make the recovery path that committed the prior run also settle its Runner and controller projection. I chose the first approach for these reasons: - The provider history stayed in the unreachable sandbox. A settled projection cannot make it resumable. Admission would pass, but a replacement sandbox would then fail on the missing backup, and a new sandbox would only try to resume a session that is gone. - A settled receipt written by recovery would claim a suspension that the Runner never wrote. Other checks rely on that receipt as Runner evidence. - Several paths can commit a result. Only runs that commit after a settle-at-commit fix would benefit. The admission fix also unblocks tasks that were committed before it. - Admission already owns this decision. It already has the scope claim, the journal, and the database rows. ### Safety argument - No live prior owner. The coordinator has no lease owner, and the controller must be proven stopped. The follow-up runs in a different sandbox than the old Runner. A resumed sandbox keeps the existing path, which reads the old Runner's own lifecycle there. - No unsettled terminal delivery or effects. The controller acknowledged the terminal and completed every command, including the suspend command. Every tool input has an answer, and the coordinator committed the result. The unreadable Runner outbox can then hold only post-terminal telemetry. - No unsettled cleanup. Any local Runner receipt, including an unsuspended one, keeps the hold. A coordinator recovery state keeps the hold. - No ambiguous quarantine. A quarantined root from a different owner keeps the hold. A quarantined root with Runner lifecycle evidence, unknown entries, or an unsettled journal also keeps the hold. - No lost evidence. The move keeps the old authority in the session root. Existing retention expires it like other continuity breaks. A journal change during the database reads cancels the move. ## Verification - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-recovered-owner-followup.test.ts`: 12 tests pass. - Before the change, the four admission tests failed with the exact error above. This includes a re-admission that rebuilt the journal from the database and failed again. - After the change, `created` and `replacement` sandboxes are admitted. A re-admission is admitted. A task with an earlier quarantined copy of the same owner is admitted. - Eight controls keep the hold: uncommitted result, live controller lease, unexpired controller lease, recovery state, pending command, unanswered tool input, a different owner in quarantine, and an unsuspended Runner receipt in quarantine after a retry rebuilds the root. - I disabled each new guard in turn. Each change made its matching control fail. - An exploratory run of the same fixture before the change answered the Retry question above. The second follow-up selected the failed follow-up as its source and failed with `native_controller_recovery_unsupported:metadata_format`. - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts`: all 1,087 tests pass. - Related suites pass: `task-workspace-binding`, `native-controller-recovery` (unit and integration), `native-harness-backup-expiration`, `native-session-resume`, and the restart and diskless integration suites. Their container and Runner binary cases skip locally. - `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`, `pnpm check:module-boundaries`, and `git diff --check` pass. - CI passes at `879bb6a5c7`. Two attempts lost jobs when CI runners received a shutdown signal; the third attempt passed every job. - I did not run the full `pnpm test:run`, `pnpm build`, or the opt-in Linux Runner container cases locally. CI runs them. - I did not test a live sandbox provider or a live model. I could not inspect the original checkpoint contents. If a stranded run's journal does not show a delivered terminal and completed commands, its follow-up stays held. ## Risks - A follow-up after this path cannot use the lost provider history. The provider session then follows the existing resume-or-replace policy, and the task context comes from Paperclip. A checkpoint that requires the same session, such as an unfinished goal, still fails at provider recovery. - Post-terminal Runner telemetry in the lost outbox, such as a late usage report, stays lost. It cannot carry a workspace effect. - A task that already has a failed follow-up from this error can still be blocked on a board Retry. Source selection picks that failed run and fails with `native_controller_recovery_unsupported:metadata_format`. This pull request does not change source selection. A same-run retry of the failed follow-up is admitted. - The change is limited to per-turn runs on the built-in sandbox transport. Warm sessions, plugin tasks, resumed sandboxes, and restart recovery do not change. - No migration or configuration change is required. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (model ID `claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with extended thinking, repository tools, shell and code execution, and local test runs. The runtime does not expose the context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 13:24:16 -08:00
Dotta commitperclip[bot]Paperclip	4bdcd1cffc	fix(recovery): release holds for unstarted dispatch cancellations (#18838 ) Release false recovery holds for legacy dispatch cancellations whose retained evidence proves execution never started. Keep audit history, current admission gates, review-wait Retry, and retained workspace obligations. Share the execution-absence proof across cancellation policies and make the dispatcher error-code policy exhaustive. Add PostgreSQL coverage and stabilize the browser history fixture by waiting for pause cleanup before seeding it. Fixes #15483 Refs #18085 Co-authored-by: commitperclip[bot] <284812584+commitperclip[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 14:54:59 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	0b87308d5d	fix(native): defer warm continuation during predecessor finalization (#18811 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and preserves its saved results. > - Native warm sessions can continue on a retained remote Runner. > - A completed predecessor can still have a live finalization lease. > - The continuation must wait for that owner before it can start work. > - Two admission checks treated that temporary lease as ambiguous state. > - This pull request uses the existing deadline-based wait for both checks. > - The same business run can continue once, with its saved context and gates. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A compatible remote warm continuation can fail before provider work starts. Its predecessor has completed, but a finalizer still holds a live lease. The warm-session check reports `runner_state_identity_mismatch: prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`. The earlier retained-sandbox check has the same problem on the command transport. Expected behavior Keep the unstarted continuation on its existing run. Wait until the recorded owner deadline. Recheck ordinary ownership, Stop, credentials and checkpoint evidence before execution. Steps to reproduce 1. Complete a remote warm turn and retain its controller records and provider session. 2. Give that completed predecessor a live finalization lease. 3. Admit a compatible follow-up with full local controller projections. 4. Before this change, admission fails permanently. It must instead persist a bounded pre-provider wait. Paperclip version or commit The PostgreSQL regression failed before production edits on `adb49a4434`. The current head is `5762dfbe4e`, based on master `e491b23eb5`. Deployment mode Native remote sandbox execution. No database migration or provider artifact change is required. Related: #18718 refreshes stale warm-controller projections. #18343 adds controller replacement recovery. #18554 restores suspended remote sessions. This change handles a live predecessor finalizer after those source checks. The shared historical error does not identify its failed predicate. This regression proves the finalizer race; it does not prove that every historical instance of that error had this cause. ## What Changed - Defer a compatible warm continuation while its completed predecessor has a live finalization lease. - Use the same wait in the preceding retained-sandbox read check. - Preserve the current run, provider attempt count and checkpoint. Reuse the existing resumption scheduler. - Add PostgreSQL cases for both finalization phases, lease expiry, company scope, incompatible configuration, unfinished commands, Stop and duplicate resumption claims. - Add an opt-in three-turn Linux Runner case. Update the child-controller fixture to own and register a local API listener. - Document the waiting behavior and acceptance case. - Repair two readiness barriers in the refresh-worker integration fixture after a required CI shard failed twice: wait for paginated startup and for active worker promises to settle before checking idle SQL. ## Verification - Native regression RED: before production edits on `adb49a4434`, the PostgreSQL boundary case received the permanent identity error instead of `NativeControllerRecoveryWaitingError`. - Regression GREEN on the current head: all 71 focused recovery, settlement, heartbeat safety and refresh-worker cases pass on `5762dfbe4e` with Node 24.21.0 and PostgreSQL 18. They cover incompatible identities, company/configuration mismatches, expired or missing deadlines, unfinished commands, Stop, retained files and duplicate resumption claims. - Real process acceptance on the current head: the three-turn `finalizer-wait` case passes in 58.01 seconds. PostgreSQL, TLS, a rebuilt Linux Runner and the deterministic Codex app-server fixture confirm zero attempts and no provider turn during the wait, one claim resuming the same run, retained history, a healthy third warm turn and final suspension. The sibling `warm-suspended` case from master also passes, in a fresh container, in 46.02 seconds. Both runs use `5762dfbe4e`; the artifacts were rebuilt from that checkout with the repository's pinned Rust 1.97.1 toolchain. - Acceptance used Node 24.21.0 and glibc 2.41. Earlier probes exposed the missing fixture API listener and the preceding retained-sandbox guard; both are corrected. A stale disposable listener and an incompatible libc image failed setup before the successful fresh-container run. These setup failures are not the original regression's RED. - Repository typecheck/build passed locally before the rebase. Server typecheck passes after the rebase. Full CI passes on the current head: 48 successful jobs and one expected scope skip, including typecheck, build, Runner checks, all serialized-server shards, general tests, E2E and the final aggregate. Module-boundary and whitespace checks also pass. - Broad local inventories are incomplete: six chat shards passed (1,834 tests), but untouched server/UI/adapter cases hit timeouts. The exact shared-base expiration case passes alone; a full-file rerun passed all 89 assertions but timed out in teardown. A Node 24 rerun timed out in another lifecycle case and teardown. A later PostgreSQL recheck could not allocate shared memory; this task's redundant broad controllers were stopped and their logs retained. - CI attempt 1 failed a Cursor Cloud cancellation deadline, an E2E cleanup cancellation with a PostgreSQL lock timeout, and the refresh-worker startup settling limit. One failed-only retry passed Runner and E2E; the same refresh startup case failed again. Two aggregate jobs had previously stalled in the hosted-runner queue and blocked the retry; that obsolete attempt was cancelled. No repeated blind rerun is being used. - Readiness repair RED/GREEN: real PostgreSQL 18 behind a loopback proxy with 20 ms delay per direction reproduces the exact startup error before the test change; the same probe passes afterward. An initial controlled probe hit the dedicated-database naming guard before tests ran and is excluded from RED evidence. The full-file check then exposed a separate false-idle barrier: a worker could be running while its scheduler had no timer. The fixture now also checks the existing active-work tracker. All 24 cases pass with both repairs. The at-most-six scoped SQL reads and zero recurring idle-SQL assertions are unchanged; startup alone has an explicit bounded condition wait. No production behavior or timeout changes. - Greptile and Paperclip Review are both 5/5 on the current head, with no open findings. Both reviews used source inspection; the runtime evidence above was obtained separately. The previous review workspace was recovered on the first production attempt after repairing its partial-clone export. Its preserved result and real follow-up both finalized successfully, saved snapshots and released their writers and finalization leases. Three current-head CI shards received hosted-runner shutdown signals and were cancelled. All three passed their one justified retry. The queued aggregate had to be cancelled to schedule that retry; the final aggregate also passed. [Current-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41706617909). - This acceptance does not qualify a live Codex model or Daytona API run of the native repair. No deployment or recovery of the original task is claimed. ## Risks - A wait must not grant a second executor. The current attempt stays at zero until the existing scheduler claims it. Expired or missing deadlines retain their existing hold. - Saved state must survive the wait. Admission still requires the same company, task, session, configuration and physical sandbox evidence. - Current Stop, budget, credential and permission gates remain with ordinary resumption. No polling loop is added. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The runtime does not expose the exact serving model ID or context-window size. Capabilities: reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, shell tools and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 14:18:18 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	e491b23eb5	fix(runner): retire sandbox suspension receipts after admission (#18829 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Native Runner sessions preserve a conversation across task turns. > - Remote suspension records a local receipt for the stopped Runner identity. > - The built-in sandbox path now writes the same receipt as plugin tasks. > - Admission cleared that receipt only for plugin tasks. > - A later warm turn could reject a clean journal because the old receipt named an earlier run. > - This pull request clears the receipt after successful admission for both sandbox paths. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18343 and #18554 for the shared suspension receipt producer. Refs #18718 for the related controller projection refresh. What happened? After a suspended built-in sandbox session resumed, its next warm turn could fail with `runner_state_identity_mismatch: prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`. Its journal named the completed resumed run. Its local suspension receipt still named the older run. Expected behavior Successful admission must retire the prior suspension receipt. The next compatible warm turn must reuse the admitted session and provider history once. A failed admission must retain recovery evidence. Steps to reproduce 1. Complete and suspend remote turn A. 2. Resume turn B through the built-in sandbox transport. 3. Keep the controller warm, with full Runner state owned by the sandbox. 4. Admit turn C. The old local receipt conflicts with B's journal identity. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced in the executor regression on base `367f29478d`. Deployment mode Native Runner with the built-in remote sandbox transport and a warm lifecycle. ## What Changed - Clear the local suspension receipt after a remote sandbox session passes provider recovery and durable admission. Apply this to built-in runners and plugin tasks. - Extend the existing three-turn warm admission regression to cover a suspended receipt and remote-only Runner state. - Keep an active-owner control that rejects admission and retains its receipt. Keep the existing foreign-owner, retirement, configuration, plugin, and unchanged-session controls. - Add a real Linux Runner continuity case that suspends A, resumes B, and keeps B warm for C. Register the test fixture's owned local API listener. - Document receipt ownership and the new continuity case. ## Verification - The new behavioral regression failed before the production change. Turn C raised the exact identity mismatch above. The active-owner control passed and retained its receipt. - All 1,087 native executor tests pass after the fix. - Both opt-in Linux process cases pass at the final commit: ordinary warm reuse and suspension followed by warm reuse. They use PostgreSQL, TLS, current-source Rust binaries, and a deterministic Codex fixture. Each preserves one conversation, starts exactly three turns, and reuses the warm Runner and provider on turn C. - Full repository typecheck passes with `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`. Full production build passes with `pnpm build`. - All current-head CI checks pass at `a95a6fdfe8`, including the full test shards, browser shards, Rust checks, build, and typecheck. The policy job needed one retry after repository checkout timed out before checks ran. - Greptile and Ponytail each give 5/5 at the final head. There are no open review threads or findings. - The local full `pnpm test:run` attempt passed 351 cases in its first chat shard. The session interruption stopped it during the second shard, so it has no complete local verdict. The complete CI test run passes. - Module boundary checks and `git diff --check` pass. ## Risks - A receipt removed before admission could discard recovery evidence. Removal stays in the successful `onSession` callback. The negative admission control checks retention. - A stale owner must not gain authority. Journal, run, lease, and scope checks remain in place before the callback. - Historical contradictory or quarantined state still requires the existing verified recovery path. This change does not delete those records. - No migration or provider configuration change is required. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or context limit. Used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 13:42:21 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	e0c6992426	fix(heartbeat): prevent saved input starvation during queue reloads (#18819 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Accepted messages and task Retry requests use durable wake receipts. > - The recovery worker loads receipts in pages of 100 and checks batches of 25. > - Company activity can reload those pages before the pending batch drains. > - Reloads reset ready receipts' dispatch times and can repeatedly favor receipts already checked. > - This pull request preserves the priority of unchecked ready receipts so saved input can reach normal admission. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? Saved input can remain deferred after the preceding run finishes. Repeated company eligibility changes reset the dispatch times of pending receipts during paginated reconstruction. A PostgreSQL regression checks only 75 of 178 receipts on the original code despite twelve eligibility changes. Expected behavior Each ready receipt must reach its admission check. Existing wait deadlines, retry backoffs, authorization, and execution gates must still apply. Steps to reproduce 1. Seed more than one page of deferred receipts. 2. Keep those receipts pending after their checks. 3. Send company eligibility notifications between scheduler passes. 4. Check that every receipt is reconsidered, including receipts later in the backlog. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on `367f29478d`. Deployment mode Built from source with PostgreSQL. The defect occurs before provider execution. Related: #10195 reports a similar starvation symptom in a different promotion loop. #18621 added saved-input Retry after a successful run. This change fixes fairness in the deferred-receipt worker. ## What Changed - Add an optional entry merge callback to scoped deadline reconstruction. - Use it in the deferred-receipt worker to retain unread ready receipts' priority while refreshing their state. - Place receipts whose wait has expired into the ready queue during reconstruction. - Keep real wait, claim, and dispatch deadlines authoritative. - Add a paginated starvation regression, real process dispatch coverage, and GitHub lock-collision recovery coverage. - Document the recovery fairness rule. ## Verification - The PostgreSQL starvation regression checks only 75 of 178 receipts before the fix. It checks all 178 afterward, both with ordinary receipts and with expired execution waits. - Seven focused scheduler cases pass, including moved interrupt grace, moved native error deadline, fresh claim/wait deadlines, and unchanged-gate grace. - GitHub endpoint lock-collision recovery, retained board authority, HTTP Retry, and five current admission-gate cases pass. - Real process acceptance passes on the final code: task Retry crosses the repeatedly invalidated backlog, reconstructs its persisted queued run after a worker restart, saves `receipt-proof` in run output, and has one successor for the Retry receipt. The test holds executor capacity while advancing queue time, then starts fresh workers at PostgreSQL time before releasing a real process lease. The defect is in admission scheduling before provider execution; this acceptance uses PostgreSQL and a local process adapter. - The full workspace build and typecheck (`node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`) pass locally. The affected worker suites pass 52 of 53 cases together; the existing native multi-company batch case times out in that combined run and passes in isolation without code changes. All new regression and acceptance cases pass. - Local `pnpm test:run` stops in its first chat shard on three 15-second timeouts (Teams long native HTTP picture delivery, direct final-response materialization, and contended inbound notices). All three pass in isolation without code changes. Later full-suite groups did not run locally after that shard failure. - [The full GitHub Actions matrix passes](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41697489374) on `ac91df2cc6db6c77529d923177b375b8c92efd45`, including all general-test, serialized-server, browser, build, and typecheck jobs. Server shard 8 initially failed an upstream process-adoption test and passed its one rerun without code changes. - [Greptile is 5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18819#issuecomment-6612091535) on the same current head, with no actionable findings or unresolved review threads. The separate Paperclip Review check is neutral; its previous request was bound to an older commit. Focused command: ```sh pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/deferred-execution-receipt-work.test.ts server/src/__tests__/scoped-deadline-work.test.ts ``` ## Risks - Ready receipt order changes during repeated reconstruction. Admission still reads current durable state. - A ready receipt must not inherit an obsolete priority after it acquires a future deadline. The merge applies only when both pending and loaded entries are immediate. Deadline safety tests cover that boundary. - The merge callback is optional. Other scoped workers retain their current reconstruction behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` in Codex, max reasoning effort, with tool use and local code execution. The runtime does not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused regressions and acceptance; full-run timing limitations documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 13:17:00 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	367f29478d	fix(recovery): preserve the bound remote writer before continuation (#18803 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and preserves task files. > - A remote workspace records the exact run that owns its unsaved files. > - A later setup failure can become the latest task run without owning those files. > - Retry only inspected that latest run, so the original writer had no file-recovery owner. > - A released reusable source also failed the legacy retention rule. > - This change registers the bound writer, saves its files, and then admits the saved user request once. > - Existing stop, ownership, approval and execution-evidence checks remain effective. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A native run prepared a remote workspace and failed before finalization. Its sandbox stopped with a dedicated stop receipt. The workspace stayed dirty and retained that run as its writer. A later setup failure became the latest task run. Retry inspected the newer run and left the original file obligation unregistered. New attempts failed at the writer fence. Registration alone was insufficient. After file recovery, continuation still required the Retry source to be one of the older recovery sources. A newer pre-provider failure did not satisfy that check. Workspace selection could also choose a fresh directory instead of the recovered files. Expected behavior Find the writer through the task's current workspace binding. Register only its exact prepared source. Preserve the released lease and its stop receipts. Save the files before continuation. Independently prove that a newer setup failure never dispatched work. Select the verified saved workspace and admit the Retry once. Steps to reproduce 1. Fail a native run with a prepared remote workspace and a released reusable sandbox. 2. Keep matching dedicated stop receipts and the workspace's dirty writer authority. 3. Record a newer pre-provider setup failure for the same task. 4. Request Retry. Before the fix, no file-maintenance record owns the actual writer. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced before production edits on master `f7ad1dc7ca`. The branch was rebased on master `adb49a44346849e751548b2fb640693dbfad4b6f`. Deployment mode Authenticated hosted execution with Paperclip Runner and remote workspace storage. Companion: #18798 (now merged upstream) fixes a pre-existing inbox test synchronization race. Its test-only commit `110aa88489cad926a451c972ad731ede469347c1` is cherry-picked here with attribution so this PR can run the complete CI matrix. Related: #17800 registers missing preservation for the selected source run. #18678 holds unfinished remote exports. #18718 repairs a prior warm-controller projection failure. #17916 addresses a separate legacy warm-copyback policy case. ## What Changed - Discover the failed writer through the company-scoped task/workspace binding during Retry and authenticated message admission. - Reuse the exact prepared-source validator for released remote workspaces. Registration changes neither the lease policy nor its stop receipts. Physical recovery retains its full allocation checks. - Check a newer failed preparation separately before allowing an older, repaired source to release continuation. Provider events, leases, results and execution ownership remain disqualifying evidence. - Select the bound saved workspace through the continuation's verified repair receipt. - Add PostgreSQL safety cases and an HTTP Retry workflow with real file capture and saved-copy reads. Document the execution contract. - Reuse #18798's completion barrier for the existing inbox cancellation test; preserve its eight-slot limit, rejection and coalescing assertions. ## Verification - RED before production edits: the exact stopped writer has no `workspaceRestoreRecovery` after Retry. Six unsafe-source controls pass on the baseline. - GREEN: the expanded Retry/message/preview selection passes 17 cases. All 627 tests in the five affected recovery suites pass on recovery commit `b572304f772d236b8a8bdf095e13e651d808f41c`, including Stop, ownership, saved messages and duplicate Retry. - The HTTP workflow registers maintenance, keeps execution held before save, reads back the saved file bytes, and admits exactly one continuation with `resume_preserved_workspace`. A registration-only repair first failed after save because it did not reconcile the newer Retry source. The incident-shaped pair passes with an independent active stranded-task action present. - Greptile identified the path where the newer setup failure already owns a reconciliation hold. Its new regression failed before the correction (saved files, zero queued continuations); the contradictory-dispatch control passed. All four HTTP variants pass after the correction, covering both hold shapes and both dispatch-evidence controls. - Repository typecheck and build passed. Server typecheck and build also passed after the recovery changes. Module-boundary and whitespace checks pass. - The full local Vitest command failed in the GitHub fast-response acknowledgement test (`delivery_unknown`: one response write instead of zero). That isolated case passes on this branch and unchanged master; the original full-run cause remains unestablished. A sibling run passed 199 test cases but timed out in workspace-suite database cleanup. Unchanged master also passed all 126 workspace cases and timed out in the same cleanup hook; all five acknowledgement outcomes passed in that baseline comparison. These local failures remain recorded rather than being reported as suite passes. - The first hosted matrix failed the pre-existing inbox cancellation assertion (expected nine computes, saw eight). The same assertion failed in [master CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41664339150/job/126015526840) and reproduced locally before applying #18798's existing repair. All six inbox HTTP/database cases pass after that repair. Final head `7f2fafcbace74cb1ad8ea68c8375a69b42ed30d9` adds only that attributed test change to the verified recovery code. - [Final hosted CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41677310377) passes on head `7f2fafcbace74cb1ad8ea68c8375a69b42ed30d9`, including `ci / verify`, `ci / e2e`, typecheck, build, every server/chat/workspace group, Runner checks and all eight browser shards. There are 54 successful check results, two informational neutral results and three skipped results, with no pending or failing results. - Greptile and the Paperclip reviewer both report 5/5 for that final head; no review threads remain open. The Paperclip review check is informational (`neutral`) and records its local-testing limitations. - The file workflow uses real PostgreSQL, subprocess file capture, encrypted saved objects and production recovery code. Provider resume/stop calls are simulated at the environment driver boundary. This does not prove a live Daytona or Codex recovery. No deployment or original-task retry is claimed. ## Risks - File-maintenance discovery must not authorize another executor. Existing writer, coordinator and physical allocation checks still own that decision. - A false bootstrap summary cannot prove that a newer run never executed. The new path also requires its immutable native-adapter claim, unresolved preparation state, absent coordinator/process/session/lease/result evidence, and no dispatch events. - Additional database reads run only during explicit task admission or Retry strategy selection. They are company/task scoped and add no polling loop. The saved-writer query returns one matching snapshot and omits prompt bodies. - No schema, credential, provider profile or deployment setting changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution and test tools. The runtime does not expose the exact serving model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 11:25:24 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	e16de641ba	fix(heartbeat): retain Stop and receipt debt after setup failure (#18776 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The server owns execution, Stop delivery, and usage settlement. > - A restored execution can fail during preparation. > - A preparation failure does not prove that earlier provider work never started. > - Replacing its result metadata can remove an existing Stop and falsely release its accounting hold. > - This pull request preserves those obligations at the terminal write. > - The benefit is honest cleanup and receipt debt without new execution authority. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A recovered native run can fail a configuration check before dispatch in the new controller. The setup failure writes bootstrap metadata with `providerWorkStarted: false`. It also replaces the previous result metadata. This can remove a pending native Stop. Accounting then accepts the new bootstrap flag and releases the original hold despite an incomplete receipt. Expected behavior Keep the current run-Stop and receipt debt when setup fails after earlier native execution. Preserve an acknowledgement that commits during the failure write. Fresh setup that never dispatched must remain eligible for pre-provider settlement. Keep account-identity checks effective. Steps to reproduce 1. Save admitted native execution, an active provider checkpoint, an original held reservation, and an audited pending run-only Stop. 2. Recover the run and fail preparation with an account configuration error before the new controller dispatches. 3. Run ordinary cost reconciliation with an incomplete receipt. 4. Observe that the base removes the Stop and releases the hold as if the run never started. Related: #18682 repairs exact-session Stop cleanup after restart. This change protects setup failure before that path. #18702 handles AI connection-request waits. #18035 proposes broader accounting policy. #18778 separately handles retained cleanup across account changes. Account, budget, and receipt authority are unchanged here. ## What Changed - Mark setup-failure status writes through an internal lifecycle option. At the atomic write, a prior coordinator attempt bound to the same run, company and task prevents false pre-provider evidence, even with a stale loaded profile. Lock the coordinator before the run so an in-flight claim cannot be missed. Selected execution input alone does not imply provider work. - Keep genuine pre-dispatch setup eligible for settlement after fresh native input is persisted, whether the loaded profile is current or stale. - Preserve only exactly bound native run-Stop fields from the current database row during failure writes, including the intentional handoff marker. Keep the latest acknowledgement when the update waits behind another writer. Normal Stop delivery still advances its own metadata. Replace unrelated stale result fields. - Add real PostgreSQL regressions for receipt debt, original holds, stale snapshots, late acknowledgement, fresh setup, dispatched work, and foreign or task-scoped metadata. - Update the execution contract. ## Verification - On untouched master, the recovered-setup regression fails six assertions: Stop removal, false bootstrap evidence, false accounting settlement, lost debt, and released hold. The fresh-setup control passes. - A second regression fails four assertions with the first repair present when the loaded profile lacks the current saved execution. The atomic current-row check fixes that case. - The focused safety selection passes. It includes real row-lock contention. A controlled concurrent writer seeds audited acknowledgement state while the terminal update waits. The product code retains that state and creates no acknowledgement or provider turn. This race test does not prove physical provider termination. - Fresh native and legacy setup can settle without a receipt. Dispatched native and legacy work keeps its debt. Foreign run, company, issue and task-scope metadata stays excluded. Unrelated old result fields are replaced. - After the final review fixes, all three completion, Stop and budget-cancellation suites pass: 121 tests. The exact `pnpm run typecheck:build-gaps` entry point passes after the final source and service-test edits. Module-boundary checks pass. An ordinary adapter pre-provider receipt control also passes. - Native review also found that fresh selected input could be mistaken for prior execution. Real-admission loaded/stale cases fail against the earlier head; a prior-attempt-only control passes. The correction uses the bound coordinator attempt and includes a foreign-task negative. Reservation `providerStartedAt` is stamped at reservation creation and is not used as provider-work evidence. - A row-lock regression also exposes a first execution claim committing during the terminal write: the prior statement snapshot misses it and falsely releases the hold. Locking the exact coordinator before the run fixes that race and preserves the existing claim lock order. Concurrent Stop acknowledgement tests remain green. - Review found two preservation gaps. New real-database reds show handoff classification loss and overwritten budget Stop delivery progress. Failure-only preservation and the bounded handoff marker address them. - Initial helper-import and reservation-order fixture errors are retained separately from causal failures. No assertion or deadline was relaxed to pass the regression. - Current-head Greptile is 5/5. The optional native review stopped before completing and returned NEUTRAL; this is not substantive approval. Its prior finding was reproduced and fixed. Coordinator and independent source/evidence reviews found no additional issue; neither is a hosted recovery test. - These are local database tests with saved provider state. No hosted recovery, physical provider termination, historical-state repair, or deployment is claimed. Full repository tests and build passed in current-head CI: 55 successful checks, three expected skips, and the explicitly incomplete optional native review returned NEUTRAL. Required verify and e2e aggregates passed. ## Risks - The current database row must retain canonical Stop state while replacing other result metadata. The preservation is limited to the same native run, company, issue and run-only Stop scope. - Setup-failure history checks keep uncertain work pending. They do not create a receipt, acknowledgement, reservation or charge. - The setup-only write option leaves ordinary adapter pre-provider receipts unchanged. No account-identity, budget, dispatch, or provider authorization gate is bypassed. - Already overwritten historical state needs separate evidence and repair. This change does not reconstruct it. - No schema, public API, provider profile, or deployment setting changes are required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, `gpt-6.1-sol`, Extra High reasoning, with source inspection, code execution, and regression testing. Context-window capacity is not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 08:49:28 -06:00
Devin Foley Paperclip Dotta	17e8bd7735	fix(runner): save native checkpoints when the sandbox disk is full (#18705 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native runs on a remote sandbox save two things after each turn: the provider checkpoint and the workspace export > - An agent can fill the sandbox disk during its own work, for example with a package install > - The turn still finishes, but both saves need free sandbox disk, so they fail and the task becomes blocked with no clear reason > - This pull request makes the checkpoint work on a full disk and makes a full disk visible in the export failure > - The benefit is fewer stranded checkpoints, and an operator sees at once why an export failed ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #18715 added the shared-principal response-recovery control synchronized below. #18644 reduced the scratch disk that the workspace capture uses. #18172 added the disk-free streaming fallback to the Daytona directory sync-out. Both were deployed when this failure occurred. Neither changes the checkpoint copy, and neither can help when the disk has no free space. What happened? A native agent ran a package install for a large monorepo in a 10 GB Daytona sandbox. `df` in the run showed `10G 10G 4.6M 100%`. The agent committed its work and reported `done`. Then: 1. The provider checkpoint made a filtered copy of the provider directory inside the sandbox (`tar -cf archive; tar -xf archive -C snapshot`) to apply its exclusions. On the full disk, tar failed. The run recorded `runner_remote_checkpoint_snapshot_failed` without the reason, and the partial copy stayed on the disk. 2. Workspace finalization failed three times, and file preservation failed six times. The capture builds its archive inside the sandbox, so each attempt failed. Every failure was recorded as `remote_workspace_operation_failed` / `export_interrupted`, so nothing named the full disk. 3. The task went to `blocked`. The only copy of the commit was in the retained sandbox. Expected behavior The checkpoint does not need free sandbox disk when the provider can stream. A workspace export that cannot fit says that the sandbox disk is full. Steps to reproduce 1. Run a native agent with a provider whose checkpoint has exclusions (for example ACPX) in a small remote sandbox. 2. In the turn, fill the sandbox disk (for example `pnpm install` of a large repository, or `fallocate` of the free space) and finish the task. 3. The checkpoint fails with `runner_remote_checkpoint_snapshot_failed`, and every workspace export attempt fails with a generic code. Paperclip version or commit Observed on `410b0e27015`. This change is based on `5955dd4eb4c`. ## What Changed - Synchronize the shared-principal response-recovery regression with its saved comments and empty final deadline. Cover an in-flight discovery invalidation. Keep every authority lock, exact publication, error, and no-retry assertion. This changes test synchronization only. - `syncRemoteRunnerDirectoryOut`: when the in-sandbox checkpoint copy fails with a full-disk tar diagnostic, remove the partial copy and pass the exclusions to the provider sync-out (`exclude` on the directory mapping). The Daytona sync-out streams the directory without sandbox disk when it cannot write its archive. Other copy failures and timeouts still throw `runner_remote_checkpoint_snapshot_failed`. They now also remove the partial copy. - `remote-workspace-transport.ts`: the helper install and the capture scripts report `remote_workspace_sandbox_disk_full: ...` when Node reports `ENOSPC` or `EDQUOT`, or a Git or tar child reports "No space left on device". `command()` passes only that exact message through, like the existing unfinished-Git-operation message. - `native-workspace-finalizer.ts`: a remote save that fails with that message adds it to the failed operation's stderr. The failure code, the retry budget, and the recovery flow do not change. ## Verification - Current-head infrastructure interruption: the [Build job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41637668555/job/125923826158) completed the actual build and production bundle boot, then the runner received a shutdown signal during the clean public Grok npm-install check. GitHub marked that step cancelled. The exact host-stop cause was not retained. One bounded rerun of only the failed Build and dependent `ci / verify` jobs passed on the unchanged head. [Build attempt 2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41637668555/job/125931400745) completed successfully, including the clean Grok npm-install check. No product code, assertion or workflow changed for this interruption. - CI failure retained: commit `6c5937fcae` failed [chat shard 1/3](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41634638570/job/125913957217) because the shared-principal fixture saw zero saved comments after `worker.ready` and zero active work. The other chat child passed. The exact case passed once locally and then 30 times on the same Node 24.22.2 version as CI; those passes alone do not explain the CI interleaving. - Controlled RED/GREEN: invalidate the real database discovery once while its read is in flight. The worker correctly retains a future reconstruction deadline, but the old initial-pass/active-count barrier reproduces the same zero-versus-one comment assertion. Waiting for both saved comments and final `active=0`/`nextWakeAt=null` passes. Six real-PostgreSQL controls pass on final commit `a60e5629e8`, including endpoint independence, source revocation, and external lock failure/recovery. No sleep, timeout increase, weakened assertion, or product scheduling/authorization change was added. - A local server typecheck first lacked the checkout's built Runner declarations. After the declared Runner TypeScript build, the server typecheck passes on `a60e5629e8`. Final-head remote verification is complete: 54 successful checks, 3 expected skips, no failures or pending checks, and successful `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e` aggregates. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact commit with no unresolved review threads. - Merge preparation: rebased onto master `b22ef22d56` and kept both test-import additions. Added the checkpoint fallback and capacity-failure contract to `doc/execution-semantics.md`. On rebased commit `6c5937fcae`, 47 focused checkpoint, transport, finalization and retained warm-projection tests passed across three files. The name filter skipped 1,040 unrelated cases. Map and whitespace checks passed. The final-head CI and Greptile results are recorded above. - `npx vitest run server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts server/src/services/native-runtime/native-workspace-finalizer.test.ts server/src/services/remote-workspace-snapshot-archive.test.ts` passes (1,152 tests). - `npx vitest run server/src/services/remote-workspace-transport.test.ts server/src/services/native-runtime/native-workspace-finalizer-failure.test.ts` passes (30 tests). - New tests: - Checkpoint, with real files: a full-disk snapshot leaves a partial copy. The provider then gets the exclusions, the session files are kept, the package caches are left out, and the partial copy is removed. - Checkpoint: a permission failure and a timeout still fail, remove the partial copy, and do not call the sync-out. - Transport: the real capture scripts run with an `ENOSPC` preload, for the helper install and for the archive write. Both report the full-disk message and leave no partial attempt. A message with extra text still collapses to `remote_workspace_operation_failed`. - Finalizer: the operation stderr names the full disk and keeps `workspace_sync_out_failed`. Other failures keep the bare code. - With the source change removed, the 3 checkpoint cases and the 2 transport ENOSPC cases fail. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` is clean. - Suites that refer to the changed error codes (`explicit-native-continuation`, `native-recovery-notice-work`, `native-run-finalizer-telemetry`, `native-workspace-export-retry`, `remote-workspaces.integration`) pass. In `chat-channels.integration`, 2 cases fail locally on unmodified `master` too (a bundled skill path outside the checkout, and a chat run timing assertion). They are not related to this change. - Manual recovery of the observed task: the retained sandbox was resumed with free space, file preservation was requested again, and the saved workspace contained the agent's commit. ## Risks - The fallback runs only after the snapshot fails with a full-disk diagnostic. The normal path does not change. - Provider exclusions are not anchored to the directory root. In the fallback, a nested entry that has an excluded name (for example a nested `tmp` or `config.toml` in a Codex home) is also left out. The fallback never copies more than the snapshot, so credentials stay out of the checkpoint. - The fallback depends on the provider honoring `exclude`, which the sync protocol requires. The Daytona and Kubernetes providers honor it. - A workspace export on a full disk still fails. This change only names the cause. A full fix needs one of these: free-space reserve for the export, removal of re-creatable caches before the export, or a capture that streams its archive. Each of these changes behavior, so this pull request does not include one. - No migration. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, assisted with merge preparation, conflict resolution, documentation, test synchronization and verification. The harness does not expose the exact serving model ID or context-window size. - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs). It did the root-cause analysis from run events, tool output, and sandbox inspection, wrote the code and tests, and ran local verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Dotta <bippadotta@protonmail.com>	2026-11-03 07:09:52 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	b22ef22d56	fix(runner): show provider failure details on tasks and runs (#18622 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native Runner starts providers and records their run outcomes. > - Provider failures can contain useful details below a generic protocol error. > - Those details were lost at the sidecar, command receipt, and run projection boundaries. > - A blocked task therefore showed a generic failure even when the provider gave a clear reason. > - This pull request carries a bounded, sanitized provider failure through those boundaries. > - Operators can read the actual cause on the task and run pages. Existing recovery policy still controls retries. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17543 for the related closed JSON-RPC classification work. Refs #17272 for provider recovery in the legacy OpenCode adapter. This change adds display evidence for native Runner providers and keeps recovery policy separate. What happened? A native Claude session returned an HTTP 429 message below an ACP `Internal error`. The task and run showed only a generic startup failure. Operators had to inspect the provider response to learn that the account was rate limited. Expected behavior The task and run show the sanitized provider message, provider name, startup or turn phase, and available HTTP status. Unknown categories keep the message. Display evidence does not grant a retry or replace a recovery decision. Steps to reproduce 1. Start a native Claude run whose account is rate limited during model selection, or return a structured provider failure from a Codex or OpenCode turn. 2. Let the run fail and open its task page. 3. Before this change, the page shows a generic failure. With this change, the page shows the provider explanation. The run page shows the same explanation after reload. Paperclip version or commit Source checkout based on `f8a888a072`. ## What Changed - Add one JSON Schema for `ProviderFailure` and generate matching Runner and shared TypeScript readers. Keep the Runner package independent of the app workspace at runtime. - Normalize known ACPX, Codex, and OpenCode error fields. Preserve unknown messages. Redact known credential values and credential patterns before applying the 4,000-character limit. Do not copy response bodies, headers, stacks, or prompts. - Carry startup failures through the sidecar, Rust Runner, durable command receipts, and private transport error details. Keep provider text out of generic transport error strings and Sentry failure messages. - Keep turn failures in authenticated run events. Recover the same evidence from persisted events during server finalization. Store the cause in the company-scoped run result. - Show one shared notice on failed tasks and run details. Keep existing retry permissions, scheduled retry state, and resolved-task behavior. - Reapply registered run-secret and current-user redaction to task display data. Batch secret lookups for only the visible provider causes. - Document the contract and update the capability maps. Add regressions for nested Claude 429 errors, OpenAI quota and rate limits, OpenCode errors, redaction, durable receipt replay, restart finalization, and UI rendering. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. `pnpm build` passed. All GitHub Actions build, test, package, and validation jobs passed on `d49c79ab4a`. The security checks passed. Greptile gave this head 5/5 with no open review threads. Paperclip Review remains pending. Its review worker exhausted six workspace recovery attempts with export_interrupted. A fresh review request was accepted and is waiting for that saved workspace. The ordinary Retry action rejected reuse of the stopped request. This is an external review-worker blocker; no check was overridden. The duplicate local `pnpm test:run` was stopped after the CI test shards passed. - Focused server settlement, provider evidence, and restart tests: 93 passed. Runner admission and normalization tests: 103 passed. Focused Runner wire and terminal tests: 29 passed. The real Rust/sidecar command receipt replay test passed. - The new projection test failed before implementation because the task had no provider cause. The startup producer regression also failed before extraction moved ahead of the generic error-code replacement. Both pass with this change. - Live check: a rebuilt local sidecar received an actual Claude HTTP 429 during startup. The new cause kept the full provider message. A synthetic task in an isolated local app then reached the same provider error through the native Runner path. The dedicated run result, task API, task banner, and run detail all showed the same message after reload. The later reporting fix keeps run.error generic; a regression proves the display cause still survives restart and stays out of Sentry capture. - The first isolated app attempt failed earlier in `admission_credential`. An ordinary manual Retry reached the provider and produced the 429 above. This PR does not claim to fix that separate admission failure. An initial parallel local database test setup also failed; the serial restart suite passed. - Security review found that copying display text into run.error could forward it to Sentry. A regression failed with that behavior. The fix keeps the cause in its display field. All 38 settlement/restart tests and the server typecheck pass. - All 29 protocol contract tests pass, including bounds and extra-field rejection. An earlier full Rust core run passed. The later full run hit one 5-second receipt-limit timing assertion; its isolated rerun passed. The full Linux and Windows Rust CI jobs passed on this head. - Review regressions pass for explicit Codex driver identity, native Rust startup and resume receipt propagation, oversized OpenCode/ACPX errors, task read-time registered-secret redaction, and the standalone source closure. The focused Runner run passed 103 tests; projection/restart tests passed 16. - Read-time redaction edge cases passed: a missing decryption key omits only the unsafe optional explanation; expanded redacted messages remain visible within the Unicode character limit. All 14 task projection tests and server typecheck pass. - The package Build check found an old Pi assertion against Error.message. The probe now checks the exact closed classification in the authenticated receipt and requires the new provider cause. Both polling transport cases pass. A local credential-free Pi probe stopped at admission_installation because this checkout lacks the Pi distribution; the installed Linux package probe passed in CI on this head. - UI coverage includes startup and turn text, unknown categories, literal rendering of provider text, read-only retry behavior, and resolved-task suppression. Token gates and map checks passed. - The live check covers Claude startup on macOS. Codex, OpenCode, terminal failures, and restart paths have deterministic regression coverage. The change is not deployed. ## Risks - Provider messages are untrusted text. The boundary selects specific fields, redacts credential patterns and known environment secret values, bounds the message, and renders plain text. New provider-specific secret formats may need added redaction patterns. - Optional fields preserve compatibility with older producers and stored runs. Old runs without the field keep their current fallback text. No database migration is required. - The cause stays in company-scoped run data. This change does not send provider text to first-party Telemetry or add it to OpenTelemetry span attributes. - Normalized categories and retryability are display evidence. Existing recovery classifiers, retry limits, ownership checks, and approval gates keep their authority. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser verification. The host does not expose the exact serving variant or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 06:13:26 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	718336eb04	fix(native): refresh prior warm controller projections (#18718 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native remote sessions keep their controller state in a database checkpoint. > - An admission can also leave a full local copy of a prior run's state. > - The prior owner can commit more state without changing its run ID. > - Warm admission skipped a refresh when the local and saved run IDs matched. > - This pull request refreshes that prior-run copy when no retained warm owner exists. > - The next turn can use the committed state while existing ownership checks remain effective. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A prior warm run can complete after an earlier admission reads its controller checkpoint. The local copy can still contain a pending command or lack the final terminal event. A later admission sees the same run ID and skips restoration. It can then hold work against that old copy even though the database checkpoint has settled. Expected behavior Read the canonical prior-run checkpoint before reuse when no retained in-memory owner exists. Keep current-run state with its controller. Keep unresolved canonical work and invalid checkpoint bindings blocked. Steps to reproduce 1. Create a full prior-run local projection while a command is pending. 2. Complete that command and record the terminal in the canonical checkpoint under the same run ID. 3. Start an ordinary remote warm continuation without a retained in-memory owner. 4. Before this change, the local command remains pending. With this change, the completed command and terminal replace the stale copy. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on master `36df8933f0` before changing production code. Related work: #18018 restored per-turn checkpoints; #18343 added controller replacement recovery; #18554 restored missing remote suspension receipts. This change handles a full prior-run projection whose run ID already matches the saved supervisor. It does not change the settlement guard or MCP compatibility policy. ## What Changed - Refresh a prior-run warm controller projection even when its run ID has not changed. - Keep current-run and retained warm owner authority on the existing path. - Add five executor cases for a settled source, a pending canonical command, a current run, legacy file-backed state, and an invalid checkpoint binding. - Add an opt-in Linux continuity case with a stale full local projection and two follow-up turns. - Update execution documentation and the paired session verification recipes. ## Verification - RED before the production edit: the executor fixture retained `pending` in its local command record when the canonical record was `completed`. - GREEN on the final commit: 48 focused tests passed across executor restoration, retained warm owner rotation, per-turn restoration, and remote settlement guards. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passed. The server TypeScript check also passed after the integration fixture was added. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check` passed. - The unit fixture uses the real durable controller serializer and the real executor entry. It stops at current tool authority before provider/backend creation. It proves restoration and guard behavior, not full task acceptance. - Actual protocol RED/GREEN: the same opt-in continuity fixture uses real PostgreSQL, TLS, the current Linux Rust Runner, and a deterministic fake Codex backend. With only the executor restored to its parent revision, continuation fails with `prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate` in the settlement guard after one provider turn (20.16 seconds). The PR source completes all three turns with one provider thread and final suspension (34.77 seconds). Hard recovery permits one provider-process replacement; the healthy final follow-up starts no additional process. Both runs use the same Runner binary and owned container. - The exact PR executor source was restored after the baseline comparison, its Git blob was verified, and the worktree is clean. The disposable local container was removed. This fixture proves the controlled stale-projection recovery path; it does not establish a live model or Daytona API result. - Full current-head CI passes, including typecheck, build, general and serialized tests, Rust/Runner checks, all eight E2E shards, and the `ci / e2e` and `ci / verify` aggregate gates. Greptile is 5/5 on the current commit, with no unresolved review threads. No original task was retried and no staging sandbox lifecycle was changed. ## Risks - Admission without a retained owner performs one additional scoped checkpoint read when a full prior-run projection already exists. - The canonical checkpoint must still pass its company, task, session and record validation. A pending canonical command stays held. Current-run and retained owner state are not replaced. - The regression proves a stale local projection defect. It does not establish that a historical incident had those same local bytes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The harness does not expose the exact serving model ID or context-window size. Capabilities: repository inspection, code generation, tools, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 06:12:22 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	db8a273562	fix(native): publish fresh retry sessions for later turns (#18713 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native tasks save a provider session for later comments and monitor checks. > - The goal projection also records the run that owns the session event sequence. > - A fresh retry uses a new native session, but the projection accepted only the old session. > - The accepted checkpoint then rejected session publication because the goal source still named the old run. > - This pull request lets the current task executor advance that source after a terminal predecessor with no unfinished goal. > - Later turns can then use the fresh retry's saved session. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #12669, #18343. I searched open and closed PRs for source epochs and native task-session publication. I found no duplicate repair. What happened? A successful fresh native retry could retain its predecessor's task-session pointer. A later comment or monitor selected the old provider session. The goal source transition required both runs to have the same native session. The terminal checkpoint then saved a `suppressed_newer` publication result. Expected behavior The current task executor can publish its accepted fresh session. A later turn resumes that session. Delayed events cannot restore the old source or revive a cleared goal. Steps to reproduce 1. Complete a native turn and retain its task-session row. 2. Admit a fresh session on the same task without deleting the row. 3. Complete that turn, then send an ordinary follow-up. 4. Before this change, the saved pointer can still name the first session. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on source commit `36df8933f0` with a PostgreSQL regression before the production change. Deployment mode Source checkout. The affected producer runs for local and remote native sessions. ## What Changed - Permit a different native session to advance the goal source only when its run holds the task execution lock and assignee, and the task is in progress. - Keep the terminal predecessor, native runtime, runner identity, absent or completed goal, source sequence, and conversation reset checks. - Test accepted session publication, a fresh heartbeat followed by an ordinary resumed turn, stale events, current-owner loss, and unfinished or unreadable goals. - Add an opt-in live Codex file-persistence check. Update execution documentation and both recovery maps. ## Verification - Red: the new PostgreSQL publication regression failed before the producer change. The saved session, display ID and goal source still named the predecessor. - Green: 72 distinct tests passed across the final focused runs of `runner-goals.test.ts`, `native-task-session-publication.test.ts`, `native-session-resumption.test.ts`, and `remote-warm-session-recovery.test.ts`. - The assembled heartbeat test admits three turns, opens two provider sessions, resumes the second session once, and stores three results. It uses a deterministic provider backend. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check` passed. - Real local Codex acceptance passed on macOS arm64 with `gpt-6.1-sol` and explicit warm mode. Three heartbeat turns saved three exact file lines. The fresh second turn published its new normalized and provider session IDs. The ordinary third turn retained both IDs. The fixture closed its warm owners and removed its private credential copy and workspace. The production code was at `450e15e`; the final test-only commit selects explicit warm mode and uses the existing owned-home cleanup helper. The production change is identical in the final head. - The earlier per-turn fixture preserved all three file steps and selected the correct normalized session, but provider-thread reuse failed. `run.attach` reported that the Codex provider had pending events; the safe fallback used another provider thread. This remains a separate failure. The first fixture cleanup also failed on immutable instruction assets. The owned-home helper fixed cleanup, and the second per-turn attempt exposed the provider identity assertion directly. - Full current-head CI passes, including typecheck, build, general and serialized tests, Rust/Runner checks, all eight E2E shards, and the `ci / e2e` and `ci / verify` aggregate gates. Greptile is 5/5 on the current commit, with no unresolved review threads. Broad local workspace checks were not duplicated; the focused regressions and actual provider acceptance above were run locally. No merge, deployment, or recovery of an original task is included. ## Risks - Source epoch changes affect saved goal state. The fresh-session path requires current task authority and refuses unfinished or unreadable saved goals. - The change starts no provider work and changes no prior-owner recovery guard. Unknown external outcomes retain their reconciliation hold. - A prior session remains held when it lacks the required authority or state proof. - Per-turn provider-thread reuse remains an open coverage gap described above. This change does not alter that attachment guard. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact model ID and context window are unavailable in this session. The agent used code inspection, tools, and executable tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 06:12:00 -06:00

1 2 3 4 5