mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-09 16:02:36 +01:00
124b2cd0ad1ebd6bf3e4e4625007d994319dfad9
9
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
2575b941d0 |
feat(task-chat): show hook and auto-review decisions as governance rows (#19266)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run on harnesses such as Codex and Claude, and the task chat shows what each run did > - Harnesses make automatic decisions: hooks block or allow tool calls, and Codex auto-review approves or denies actions > - Today Paperclip drops these decisions or shows them as generic rows. Codex `safety.review.*` always says `decision: "unknown"`, the native Rust runner drops `hook/*` and `item/autoApprovalReview/*`, and claude-agent-acp drops Claude hook messages > - An operator cannot see why an agent changed course or which action ran without a person's approval. This conflicts with Paperclip's approval-gate model > - This pull request records each hook and review decision with its reason and shows it as a small governance row in the task chat > - The benefit is that automatic decisions become auditable, and a blocked action explains itself without opening run logs ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 (precedent: canonical `plan.updated` events rendered as a task-chat card). Builds on #19259 (ACP `_meta` passthrough from ACPX), now merged. **Subsystem affected** Runner provider events (Rust native Codex normalizer, TS drivers, ACPX sidecar), the claude-agent-acp patch, the PRP provider-event schema, and the task chat activity UI. **Problem or motivation** Hook and auto-review outcomes reach Paperclip but are lost or flattened. Codex reviews always record an unknown decision. Native Codex runs drop hook and review notifications in the Rust normalizer. Claude hook messages never leave the adapter. Codex reuses one `run.id` for every call of a hook, and the id contains a host path. **Proposed solution** Map the real outcome, decision, action, risk and reason into additive optional fields on `paperclip.hook.v1` and `paperclip.safety.review.v1`. Forward Claude SDK hook messages. Render small grey rows: a stopped action is tinted and shows its reason, an approved review folds into the command it approved as an "auto-approved" mark, and routine hook passes stay out of activity summaries. **Alternatives considered** Separate rows for every approval. This duplicated each approved command, so approvals fold into the command row instead. ## What Changed - Runner (Rust): new `governance_events.rs`. `normalize_codex_notification` now maps `hook/started|completed` and `item/autoApprovalReview/started|completed`. Each hook call gets its own id (a digest of the run id and start time), so no host path is stored. - Runner (TS): new `governance-events.ts` with the same mapping for the TS Codex driver, and the Claude hook mapping. The ACPX sidecar publishes Claude hook updates as schema-validated `hook.*` rich events. - claude-agent-acp patch: turns on `includeHookEvents` and forwards `hook_started` / `hook_response` on `session_info_update._meta.claudeCode.hook`, with bounded output. - Protocol: additive optional fields. Hook records get `outcome`, `message`, `source` and `toolName`, and the `blocked` and `stopped` statuses. Review records get `actionKind`, `action`, `riskLevel`, `userConsent` (the reviewer's user-authorization level; keys that end in "authorization" are redacted as secrets), `rationale` and `decidedBy`, and the `timed_out` and `aborted` decisions. Regenerated the manifest and validators. - Fixed: the hook `blocking` flag read `executionMode === "blocking"`, but Codex sends `sync` / `async`. - UI: `native-run-events` keeps the full hook and review payloads. `governance-presentation.ts` writes the row labels. `fold-auto-reviews.ts` attaches an approved review to its command row. The rows show the tint, the reason line and the "auto-approved" mark. Activity summaries lead with a block or denial. - Storybook: "Task chat / Governance rows" shows every outcome, a Codex run, a Claude run and the live line. - Docs: added a governance activity section to `packages/paperclip-runner/docs/protocol-compatibility.md`. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/governance-events.test.ts src/provider-events.test.ts src/drivers/codex src/drivers/acpx src/cli`. 2305 tests pass. This includes a replay of real Codex 0.160 notifications from a session with hooks and auto-review (`test-fixtures/governance/codex-0.160-hooks-auto-review.json`, sanitized). - `cargo test --release -p paperclip-runner-core`. The full suite passes, and `governance_events::tests` replays the same fixture. - `cd ui && npx vitest run`. 11,047 tests pass. - `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`, `pnpm check:token-gates`, and the runner contract checks (`check:protocol-manifest`, `check:protocol-types`, `check:capability-contract`, `check:protocol-coverage`, replay goldens, contract fingerprints) pass. - Live test on a local isolated instance. A Codex agent and a Claude agent each used a preconfigured home with a PreToolUse hook that blocks edits to `0001_init.sql`, plus UserPromptSubmit and PostToolUse hooks. Both runs showed "PreToolUse hook blocked a tool call" (Codex) or "PreToolUse hook blocked Bash" (Claude), with the hook's message. They also showed "UserPromptSubmit hook added context", and the group summary started with the block. - Auto-review cannot run in Paperclip today, because the native Codex runner only allows `approvalPolicy: never`. The review mapping and the approval fold are proven against real Codex 0.160 app-server output (fixture above) and in Storybook. ## Risks - Low risk to execution. These records are display-only and carry no authority. All new schema fields are optional, so older records stay valid and older UIs ignore the new fields. - The `auto-approved` fold depends on `targetItemId` matching the command's execution id. Real Codex 0.160 data confirms that it matches. When there is no match, the review stays as its own row. - In Paperclip's isolated homes, hooks do not run, because the runner never copies hooks into an isolated home. Rows appear only for agents with a preconfigured home, or with future managed hooks. - The claude-agent-acp patch changes. The ACPX profile check still passes, because the patch is Paperclip's ACPX layer and not the upstream release. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, browser and file editing) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
86a9d3ec6c |
feat(task-chat): tool rows that say what ran and how it went (#19265)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The task chat shows each tool call an agent makes as a short activity row. > - Real Claude runs showed Bash rows named "Terminal" with no command and Write rows stuck at "Preparing file…". No row showed an exit code or a duration, and a tool refused by policy looked like any other failure. > - Codex already reported exit codes, durations and parsed command actions, but the UI dropped them, and every Codex read looked like a shell command. > - This pull request gives both harnesses one row grammar: a verb icon, the real subject, an exit chip and a duration. > - The benefit is that a reviewer can see what ran and how it went without opening each row. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19259 (this branch includes its `_meta` passthrough commit; merge #19259 first or together). **Problem or motivation** Claude tool rows hide what ran: the runner keeps the first ACP title ("Terminal", "Preparing file…") and drops the refined one. `exitCode` and `durationMs` are null on every Claude tool event. The UI ignores `tool.execution.progressed`, `exitCode` and `durationMs` for every harness. **Proposed solution** Read real tool facts in the runner (Claude `_meta.claudeCode`, raw input and result text; Codex `commandActions`), carry them in the canonical tool event, and render one row grammar in the task chat. **Alternatives considered** Enable Claude's `terminal_output` client capability to get `terminal_exit`. That changes how command output arrives, and Claude's own exit code is derived from the error flag anyway, so this PR reads the error flag and the "Exit code N" text instead. ## What Changed - **Runner (TS):** `createAcpxToolEventNormalizer` keeps the latest concrete title instead of the first placeholder. It merges tool facts across the lifecycle and measures the duration. New `acpxToolDetailFromRuntimeEvent` reads the native tool name, the command or pattern, the description, the exit code and a "Permission denied" reason. Exit 0 is inferred only for Claude `Bash`, where a non-zero exit is always a failed result. - **ACPX sidecar:** reads the facts before `rawInput` is dropped and sends a bounded `toolDetail`. A file path argument becomes an attested workspace-relative location. - **runner-core (Rust):** validates `toolDetail`. `normalize_acpx_tool_call` uses the native name, exit code, duration, subject, description and blocked reason. Codex `commandExecution` gets its operation, a single-file target and a subject from `commandActions`. The shell wrapper is removed, and a single search reads as `"TODO" in src`. - **Protocol:** `toolExecution` gains the optional fields `subject`, `description` and `blockedReason`. Generated validators and the manifest are regenerated. - **UI:** - `nativeRunEventsToTranscript` handles `tool.execution.progressed` and passes a canonical `detail` on `tool_call` entries. - The task-chat row shows `$ command`, a path or a pattern, a red `exit N` chip (exit 0 only for commands) and a duration (0 is hidden). - Three or more consecutive reads fold into "Read N files a, b, c +1". - A refused tool shows "Blocked" with its reason. - **Storybook:** `Tasks/Tool rows` compares the data recorded today with the new runner data for Claude and Codex. ## Verification - `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/provider-events.test.ts src/cli src/drivers/acpx` (1,957 pass) - `cd packages/paperclip-runner/runner && cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib provider_events` - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/components/transcript src/components/task-chat` (973 pass) - `pnpm check:token-gates`, `pnpm --filter paperclip-runner build` (includes the protocol coverage and replay-golden checks) - Live runs on a local instance with real harnesses: - Codex (gpt-5.6-sol): the rows read `$ node --test` with `exit 1` and then `exit 0`, plus real durations. A three-file `sed` shows as one command and does not claim a single file. - Claude (claude-sonnet-5-5 through ACPX): the rows show `Bash` and `Edit` instead of "Terminal" and "Preparing file…". Commands show their real text, `exit 0` and durations, and edits show `Edited temp.js`. - Not seen live: a real Claude `Write`, a folded read run and a Claude policy denial. Unit and Rust tests cover them. ## Risks - The tool-execution schema gains only optional fields, so older events stay valid. Older runs keep rendering with what they recorded. - Commands now cross the sidecar boundary as `subject` (bounded to 4,000 characters). Codex already recorded commands as the tool name, and server redaction still applies. - The tool lifecycle now keeps the latest concrete title. A provider that retitles a call to something less useful would show the newer title. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use, code execution and browser automation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
c6996799c4 |
feat(task-chat): show an inline diff for every file edit (#19269)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The task chat shows what an agent did during a run, including each tool call > - Codex and Claude both report the patch for every file edit, but Paperclip dropped it. Claude's ACP `diff` content was never read. The Codex `fileChange` item became a generic item with no patch. Codex `turn/diff/updated` had no native-runner mapping > - A reviewer could not see what an agent changed without opening the workspace > - This pull request carries a bounded patch on each edit call and shows it in the edit row. Each turn that changed files ends with a "Changed in this turn" card > - The benefit is that a reviewer can check every change in the conversation, with the same view for Codex and Claude ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 (precedent: canonical `plan.updated` events as a docked plan card). **Subsystem affected** Paperclip runner (Rust and TypeScript canonical event mapping), PRP provider-event schema, and the task-chat UI. **Problem or motivation** Edit rows say "Edited a file" with no content. Claude Edit/Write `diff` content is lost after the ACPX sidecar. The Codex native runner drops `fileChange.changes` and `turn/diff/updated`. The existing workspace-changes card showed a raw text patch in a dialog, and only on the in-process Codex path. **Proposed solution** Add an optional, bounded `fileChanges` list to `paperclip.tool.execution.v1`. Fill it from Codex `fileChange` items and Claude ACP `diff` content. Map Codex `turn/diff/updated` to `workspace.change.updated` on the native runner. In the UI, show `+N −M` on each edit row, open a compact colored diff, and end the turn with the change set. **Alternatives considered** A runner-side git diff at turn end. It needs workspace access and extra cost on every turn. The harness patches are already available. For Claude, the UI builds the turn card from the edit rows instead of new per-turn runner state. ## What Changed - Protocol: optional `fileChanges[]` on `toolExecution` in `provider-event.schema.json`, with the regenerated schema bundle, validators and manifest. Paths are workspace-relative. A patch is at most 32 KiB, and a call has at most 32 files. - Runner (Rust): new `tool_file_changes.rs`. A Codex `fileChange` item now also emits `tool.execution.*` with `fileChanges`; the native item event stays for the recovery and progress projections. `turn/diff/updated` becomes `workspace.change.updated`. `normalize_acpx_tool_call` re-validates the sidecar's `fileChanges`. `normalize_codex_notification_in` resolves absolute paths against the session cwd. - Runner (Rust): `has_bounded_rich_display_shape` accepts schema-valid workspace diffs. Without this change, durable storage cut each patch string to a 4 KiB preview. Patches use the uncapped secret redactor. - Runner (TS): new `tool-file-changes.ts`. The ACPX sidecar computes `fileChanges` from ACP `diff` content with the working directory. The in-process Codex and ACPX mappers do the same, with an optional `context` argument. - UI: new `TaskChatDiffView` (colored rows, hunk labels, a height cap, "Show N more lines"). Edit rows show counts and the diff. Collapsed activity groups show edit totals. The workspace card is now "Changed in this turn", with in-place per-file diffs, and it sits at the end of the turn. When a harness sends no whole-turn diff (Claude), the card is built from the edit rows. A change set is marked complete when its run ends. - UI: `native-run-events.ts` maps `workspace.change.updated` and attaches each edit's latest patch to its row (the `diff` transcript entries now carry `toolUseId`). - Design tokens: `--diff-add-*`, `--diff-remove-*` and `--sz-edit-diff-max-h` come from the status icon hues. - Storybook: `Tasks/Edit diffs` story. Docs: `doc/run-log-events.md`. ## Verification - Real runs on a local instance (`test-drive`, native runner): - Codex (`gpt-5.6-sol`): the "Applied a patch" rows show `+9` and `+35 −2` with their diffs. The turn ends with "Changed in this turn", 2 files, `+42`, from `turn/diff/updated`. - Claude (`claude-opus-5-5` via ACPX): the Write and Edit rows show `+5`, `+14 −1` and `+9` with correct hunks. The turn card is built from the edit rows. - Codex model note: with `gpt-5.4`, pinned Codex 0.160 reports "model metadata not found". The model then wrote files through the shell, so no `fileChange` items occurred. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: all gates clean. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/task-chat src/components/transcript src/adapters`: 1073 passed. - `packages/paperclip-runner`: `vitest run src/provider-events.test.ts src/tool-file-changes.test.ts src/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.test.ts` passed. `check:protocol-types` and `check:protocol-manifest` match. - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib provider_events tool_file_changes`: passed. `cargo fmt --check`: clean. - Storybook: open `Tasks and conversations/…/Tasks/Edit diffs`. ## Risks - Larger payloads: an edit call can carry up to 96 KiB of patch in Rust, and the sidecar keeps 48 KiB under its 128 KiB frame. Above the budget, a file keeps its counts and drops its patch (`diffTruncated`). - Redaction: each patch goes through the shared secret redactor. Before this change, a 4 KiB preview cap also applied. - Claude turn card: it joins each edit's patch in order. It is not a net diff. For a file the turn created, the counts are net and exact. For an existing file, the counts are summed over its edits. - The workspace card moves to the end of the turn. One adapter test changed to match. - Local only: four Linux cgroup `task_memory` Rust tests fail on macOS. They do not touch these modules. ## Model Used Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with tool use (shell, browser and file editing) and a long context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d8c47159d4 |
feat(task-chat): show Codex reasoning summaries as headline bullets (#19271)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The task chat shows what an agent does while it runs, including a "Thinking" row for provider reasoning > - Real Codex runs produced reasoning items with no text > - So the Thinking row only says "Thinking" and never tells the user what the agent works on > - This pull request asks Codex for its own reasoning summaries, keeps every summary part, and shows the parts as bullets > - The benefit is that a user can see what the agent is thinking about, and a collapsed live run shows the newest headline as its status line ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 (same pattern: show a harness signal that Paperclip already receives) **Subsystem affected** Native runner (Rust runnerd Codex provider and event normalization, JS Codex driver) and the task chat UI (Thinking row and activity rows). **Problem or motivation** Codex 0.160 resolves an unset reasoning summary from the model, and current models resolve it to `"none"`. The rollout of a real gpt-5.6-sol run records `turn_context.summary = "none"`, and all of its reasoning items have `summary: []`. A local A/B with `codex exec` proved the cause: `model_reasoning_summary=none` gives no reasoning text, and `auto` gives headlines. Also, runnerd dropped `item/reasoning/*` notifications and ignored the reasoning item's `summary[]`. **Proposed solution** Send `summary: "auto"` on Codex `turn/start`. Map `item/reasoning/summaryTextDelta` and `summaryPartAdded` to reasoning deltas, with a blank line before each later part. Use the joined `summary[]` as the completed item text. In the UI, split the provider text at headline lines and show one bullet per part. **Alternatives considered** Use `summary: "detailed"`. That gives longer text, but `auto` lets the provider choose the best summarizer. **Roadmap alignment** This makes existing provider signals visible. It adds no new protocol event type or data model. **Additional context** Research note: overlooked harness signals, item 2. Claude is out of scope here. A live Claude run showed thinking blocks with signatures and empty text: current models default `thinking.display` to `"omitted"`. Claude Code ignores the `showThinkingSummaries` setting in SDK mode, and ACPX does not forward a `thinking` option, so the fix needs a claude-agent-acp patch hunk. That patch is also changed by #19264, so the Claude change follows after #19264 merges. The UI in this PR already shows prose-only (Claude) summaries. ## What Changed - Rust runnerd (`codex_provider.rs`): send `summary: "auto"` on every Codex `turn/start`. - Rust runnerd (`provider_events.rs`): map `item/reasoning/summaryTextDelta` and later `summaryPartAdded` to `item.delta` with `kind: "reasoning"` and `channel: "summary"`. Use the joined `summary[]` as a completed reasoning item's text. - JS Codex driver: send `summary: "auto"` on direct app-server transports, map `summaryPartAdded`, and read `summary[]` in `itemText`. - UI: new `reasoning-summary.ts` splits provider text into headline sections, and `TaskChatReasoningSummary` shows one bullet per part. The Thinking row and the activity row use the newest headline as their one-line status. Prose-only summaries (Claude) stay as prose. - Storybook: new "Task chat reasoning summaries" story with live, expanded, finished and Claude states. - Tests: Rust normalizer test, JS driver test, and splitter unit tests. ## Verification - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core` (provider events and the shared identity golden). - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/drivers/codex` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/task-chat src/components/transcript` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - Live test on a local worktree instance with a real Codex agent (gpt-5.6-sol). The Codex rollout now records `summary: "auto"`. Run events contain `**Assessing transaction boundary issues**`, a part break, and `**Planning atomic claim fix and verification**`. The task chat shows "Thought · Planning atomic claim fix and verification", and the expanded row lists both headlines as bullets. - Storybook: open "Tasks and conversations / Task creation and lifecycle / Tasks / Task chat reasoning summaries". - Claude was not changed. A live Claude run confirmed the cause for the follow-up (empty, signed thinking blocks). ## Risks - Codex now writes reasoning summaries, which adds a small number of output tokens per turn. This is the same cost as Codex CLI with its normal default. - The UI treats a line that is only bold text as a headline. A prose line that is only bold text also starts a new bullet. This is display only. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use, code execution and browser automation. Default context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
b0fa2ef9bf |
feat(task-chat): show web searches, model switches, waits and verification checks as dedicated rows (#19262)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run through the native runner. The runner turns harness activity into typed canonical events such as `research.*`, `model.route.changed`, `wait.*` and the run's own verification checks. > - The task chat flattened these events into generic tool rows. A web search showed as "Ran Research eventType: research.started, summary: …". The run's verification checks were dropped completely. > - Live tests found a second break: the Rust runner core forwarded Codex `webSearch` items without their query, action or results. The canonical `research.*` events therefore had `query: null`. > - This pull request keeps the full payload for these families (as #19252 did for plans), adds small dedicated rows, and keeps the web-search fields through the durable runner. > - The benefit is that users see what the agent searched for, which model actually ran, how long a wait lasts, and whether each check passed, without opening the run log. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 (same pattern for the plan card) **Subsystem affected** Task chat activity rows (UI), the native run-event transcript mapping, and the Rust runner core Codex normalizer. **Problem or motivation** Provider activity that the runner already maps to canonical events reaches the task chat as unreadable generic rows. Verification checks never appear. For Codex, the web-search query and action are lost before they reach the canonical event. **Proposed solution** Keep `research`, `model_identity`, `artifact`, `review` and `wait` events as `provider_activity` entries with their full payload. Project the runner's `verification` items as a new `verification` family. Render dedicated rows: a web search with its quoted query and source-domain chips, a model switch as `from → to · reason`, a wait with a live countdown, and green/red check lines. Keep bounded web-search and sleep fields in the Rust normalizer. **Alternatives considered** A separate "Checks" block beside the final answer. We kept the checks in the activity group, because the group summary already leads with "Check failed" when a check fails. ## What Changed - `ui/src/components/transcript/native-run-events.ts`: keep research, model, artifact, review and wait events as `provider_activity` with the full payload. Map `item.completed` items of kind `verification` to the new `verification` family. Context, hook, safety and delegation stay on the generic path, because other work items own them. - `packages/adapter-utils/src/types.ts`, `ui/src/components/task-chat/task-chat-model.ts`, `ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.ts`: add the `verification` provider-activity family. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/task-chat-activity-presentation.ts`: add labels: "Searched the web “query”", "Opened a web page host/path", "Switched models a → b · reason", "Waiting 30s" / "Waited 30s", and "Check passed" / "Check failed" / "Check not run". - `ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatRunnerActivityGroup.tsx` and `TaskChatProtocolActivityRow.tsx`: show up to three source-domain chips under a finished search, a live countdown for a running wait, and a check line with a tinted icon and its detail. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/completed-activity-summary.ts`: the group summary leads with "Check failed" when a check fails, and says "Switched models" for a reroute. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/transcript-adapter.ts`: verification detail keys, and a `startedAt` timestamp that stays across lifecycle merges (used by the countdown). - `packages/paperclip-runner/runner/crates/runner-core/src/provider_events.rs`: keep bounded `query`, `action` and http(s) `results` for Codex `webSearch` items, and `durationMs` for `sleep` items. Other item types do not change. - `ui/storybook/stories/tasks/task-chat-provider-activity.stories.tsx`: new story. Its fixtures are persisted run events that go through the production transcript path. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/transcript src/components/task-chat src/components/TaskChatThread.test.tsx src/adapters/paperclip-runner src/lib`: 275 files and 3669 tests pass. - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core`: all tests pass, including the new `keeps_bounded_web_search_and_sleep_identity`. - UI typecheck is clean. `pnpm check:token-gates` is clean. `cargo fmt --check` is clean. - Storybook: open "Tasks and conversations / … / Task chat / Provider activity". It shows a settled run, a live search, a live wait countdown and a narrow layout. - Live test on a local worktree instance with a real Codex agent (gpt-5.6-sol, Codex app-server 0.160). The task asked for a web search, a parser with tests, a pause, and two checks. The task chat showed "Searched the web “ISO 8601 week date first week Thursday conversion calendar date”" and two green check rows ("node --test week-date.test.js · 8 tests passed; 0 failed.", "node --check week-date.js"). The group summary read "Ran checks". Before the runner fix, the same search had `query: null`. Not verified live: - The source-domain chips. Codex 0.160 sends `results: null`, because it keeps search results on the server. The chips appear only when a provider reports sources. Unit tests and the story cover them. - The wait countdown and the model-switch row. In the live run Codex paused with a shell `sleep`, not a native `sleep` item, and no reroute occurred. Unit tests and the story cover both. - Claude. Its WebSearch and WebFetch calls arrive as generic tool executions, because ACPX drops the tool metadata. They show as tool rows, as before. The ACPX `_meta` work is separate. ## Risks - Low risk. The change only affects how canonical events display. The generic path stays for the families that this PR does not change. - The Rust normalizer now persists the web-search query and the source URLs/titles in the run events. This data was already intended for the canonical `research.v1` event, and it is bounded (4,000 characters per text field, 64 results, http(s) URLs only). - A search that Codex reports with `action: other` and no query shows as "Searched the web" with no subject. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edit, browser automation) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
7b9334cd10 |
Draft: Build agent-ready design proposal system (#16875)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - People need consistent UI patterns to review and control that work. > - The current board uses related layouts and controls with different spacing, type, and behavior. > - That drift makes it hard for a designer or an agent to build a new page from a reliable reference. > - Storybook can show the shared patterns and the states they need to support. > - This pull request adds design proposals, a local sandbox, and reusable UI controls so people can compare the patterns in context. > - The benefit is a clearer design system that agents can use to build consistent UI. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** `ui/` — React board UI and Storybook. **Problem or motivation** Board pages repeat visual and interaction decisions. Storybook did not provide a complete reference for task views, conversation states, typography, toolbars, tabs, and light/dark colors. People could not compare a proposed pattern with the running board in one place. **Proposed solution** Add a staged Design Proposals catalog with foundations, components, layouts, and page specimens. Add an opt-in sandbox. Reuse production components where possible. Include synthetic conversation states and shared controls so reviewers can compare and refine them. **Alternatives considered** Separate static mockups would not show keyboard behavior, responsive layout, or real component states. Rebuilding each page only in Storybook would allow the reference to drift from the board. **Roadmap alignment** This improves existing board UI and Skills Manager surfaces. It does not add a new control-plane capability. ## What Changed - Added dark and light color references, typography and conversation specimens, and component stories for buttons, tabs, toolbars, sidebar, popovers, activity, and task lists. - Added a local design sandbox with synthetic task conversation playback and representative states. - Shared collection toolbars and navigation patterns across task, agent, project, routine, skill, connector, and artifact pages. - Added the streamlined Skills tabs and a My Skills collection that uses the shared skill cards. - Restored saved-thread access during synthetic playback, kept connector searchbox semantics, and updated reproduction checks after moving trial stories. - Documented the proposed patterns and added focused UI, catalog, and browser checks. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates`, `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, and `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs --check` passed. - Full workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed after merging master. After the review fixes, focused UI typecheck, `pnpm build-storybook`, 23 Skills Sources tests, and all 15 Storybook typography browser tests passed. - Focused task-thread and system-notice suites passed: 251 tests. Connector Browse passed 84 tests; the connector, attachment, recovery, and Storybook flyout browser journeys passed locally. - A local full Vitest run hit one intermittent chat-channels integration failure; that test passed in isolation. GitHub CI [39347996059](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39347996059) passed on the exact latest commit: 55 successful checks and two skipped draft-only Storybook jobs. - Greptile reviewed the exact latest commit at 5/5 with no new comments or open review threads. GitHub reports the branch as cleanly mergeable. ## Risks - This PR changes 206 files and exceeds the repository's 100-file review target. Review by commit and consider a scoped split before merge. - Design Proposals are staged references. Fixture interactions do not prove API behavior, permissions, or provider execution. - UI changes to shared controls may affect pages outside the proposal sandbox. Focused browser checks and the full CI matrix passed. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact runtime model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. The model used reasoning, code execution, browser inspection, and local tests. Earlier branch commits were also AI-assisted in this Codex conversation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details available in this session) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above where applicable - [x] I have either linked existing issues or described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id - [x] I have run focused tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Scott Tong <scott@scotts-mbp-m5-max.local> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
44736c9c7c |
fix(ui): align runner commentary with chat replies (#14716)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Agent chat shows run commentary and the agent's reply in one thread. > - The runner commentary text starts 4px left of the following reply. > - The runner activity group omits the gutter that the reply bubble uses. > - This pull request gives runner commentary the same token-based gutter. > - Both text blocks now share one left edge. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** In agent chat, the first commentary line of a completed run starts about 4px left of the following agent reply. This is visible in the Codie conversation. **Expected behavior** Runner commentary and ordinary agent reply text should have the same left edge. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open an agent chat with a completed run that has commentary and an agent reply. 2. Compare the first commentary line with the following reply at the left edge. 3. Inspect the wrappers. Before this change, `task-chat-phase-interstitial` has zero left padding and `task-chat-agent-bubble` has 4px. ## What Changed - Add the existing `px-1` spacing token to runner commentary. - Add a regression test that compares the runner commentary gutter with the ordinary agent reply gutter. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/task-chat/TaskChatRunnerActivityGroup.test.tsx src/components/task-chat/TaskChatTurn.test.tsx src/components/task-chat/TaskChatBubble.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` - A full repository typecheck and build passed earlier on this branch. All latest-commit CI gates passed, including the server shard after a transient preview readiness failure was rerun. - Browser render: runner commentary and reply paragraphs both start at x=32px after the change. ## Risks Low risk. This changes only the horizontal padding of runner commentary. Long commentary lines may wrap 8px sooner. The full local test suite was stopped after the code changed during its run; the focused UI tests and latest-commit CI suite passed. > I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This bug fix does not duplicate planned core work. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex. The runtime did not expose a more specific model ID or context window size. The agent used reasoning, shell tools, and read-only browser inspection to diagnose the layout and verify the change. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f2e2d38972 |
feat(ui): summarize completed runner activity groups (#13274)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task chat shows tool activity between agent updates. > - Finished groups currently keep the last raw command on screen. > - Failure totals add visual weight to normal retries. > - This pull request summarizes finished groups with short action phrases. > - Users can expand each group to inspect the original activity and output. > - The benefit is a quieter history that still explains the work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Runner activity in live task chat and saved history. **Current behavior** A finished group shows its last command or tool target. A separate failure count remains visible after retries. **Proposed behavior** Show short phrases such as “Ran commands” or “Read files, ran commands” when a commentary group finishes. Remove failure counts in both active and finished groups. Keep original output in expandable history. **Reason and benefit** The activity summary describes the work without filling the conversation with shell arguments or treating each retry as an alarm. Unsuccessful reads and edits use “Checked files” and “Worked on files” to avoid claiming success. **Additional context** Refs: #13255. This builds on the merged rolling activity groups. Related open PR #13246 covers steering and status presentation; this change concerns completed summaries and failure counts. The design was reviewed in desktop and mobile Storybook previews. ## What Changed - Add a deterministic summary shared by builtin and provider-native activity. - Combine repeated categories and retries, preserve category order, and bound long summaries. - Summarize each inactive commentary group while the next group can still be running. - Keep expansion, individual output disclosures, and active rolling rows. - Use the production component in eight review stories, including animated desktop and mobile transitions. - Cover retries, unsuccessful edits, unknown tools, reasoning-only groups, saved history, and resuming work. ## Verification - Focused summary, group, and runner-turn tests pass: 62 tests. - Token gates pass. - The approved Storybook previews passed browser checks for desktop, mobile, keyboard expansion, live-to-completed transitions, and original retry output. - `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and the production Storybook build pass. - The complete UI suite passes: 582 files and 6,005 tests. The full repository test run is in progress after repairing missing symlinks in the local PostgreSQL dependency. A native workspace suite that hit the setup failure now passes all six tests. - Greptile is 5/5 on the current commit, with no review threads. Security checks pass. All individual CI jobs pass except server shard 4/5, where one plugin-worker output timing assertion failed. The complete plugin-worker suite passes locally (83 tests). The workflow finished. One retry of the failed shard and aggregate check was dispatched and is queued. Squash auto-merge is enabled and remains gated on required checks. - Rechecked the production stories in the browser: mobile history stays on one line, and expansion survives completion while the next group remains active. - Review in Storybook under Tasks → Completed activity preview. Use Next to finish one group while the next group remains active. Open a completed summary to inspect its history. ## Risks - Summaries classify observed activity; “Ran commands” does not mean exit code zero. - Unknown tools use a generic description. Full names and outputs remain in history. - No API, database, or runner protocol contracts change. > Reviewed ROADMAP.md. This is a focused improvement to the existing task-chat presentation. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and browser testing. The runtime does not expose a more specific model version or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ce09ea40b0 |
feat(ui): show one rolling runner activity per commentary group (#13255)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task chat shows commentary and runner activity as work proceeds. > - The expanded activity list uses multiple text lines and an indented rail. > - The folded view can repeat reasoning and the current tool in separate places. > - This pull request shows one rolling activity between commentary messages. > - Users can open a group to follow its full history and inspect each item. > - The benefit is a compact feed with aligned icons and stable row height. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The runner activity groups in task chat, during live work and in saved history. **Current behavior** Activity is spread across a group summary, a reasoning ticker, and a current-tool row. Expanded rows have different alignment and can span several lines. **Proposed behavior** Keep one latest activity per commentary group. Roll new activities upward. Keep each expanded history row on one line. Use neutral failure text without an X icon. Keep the full details available by opening an individual row. **Additional context** Refs: #13246. That open PR covers related folded activity, steering timestamps, and status alignment. This change implements the separately reviewed activity-group design, including animated replacement, single-line expanded history, and neutral failures. It does not change steering timestamps or status pills. ## What Changed - Add a shared runner activity group with persistent expansion and reduced-motion support. - Use the group in the production runner turn and remove duplicate narration and current-tool rows. - Preserve commentary, plan cards, request receipts, and final-response placement. - Keep tool output, reasoning, research sources, file previews, and failure details accessible. - Render the production turn in desktop and mobile animated Storybook fixtures. - Add tests for animation identity, failure visibility, expansion persistence, and timeline order. - Validate resource link schemes and omit disclosure controls for items with no details. ## Verification - Focused activity, runner turn, protocol detail, and task-thread tests pass: 161 tests. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passes. - Browser checks confirm a 32-pixel compact row, centered icons, and one-line expanded rows. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. The final UI build also passes. - Two real native Codex runs completed in an isolated local instance. Each run created the expected file, performed separate delayed tool calls, reported a deliberate missing-file failure, recovered, and finished the task. - Browser verification confirmed that the open three-row activity group remained expanded after the second run moved into saved history. Saved error output remained accessible without red styling or an X. - The complete UI suite passes: 581 files and 5,979 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build-storybook` passes for the final production fixtures. - Greptile rates the latest commit 5/5, with zero new comments and no unresolved review threads. The security scan passes. - All repository test shards pass in CI. The duplicate local `pnpm test:run` was stopped after CI completed the full test coverage. The CI build failed twice because the worker ran out of disk space compiling the Rust runner tests (`No space left on device`, error 28). The build and its aggregate verify gate remain blocked by CI capacity. GitHub squash auto-merge is enabled and will wait for required checks to pass. ## Risks - This changes presentation and disclosure behavior. Users open a group to see earlier activity. - Animation uses stable item IDs. A provider that replaces IDs can trigger another transition. - No API, database, or runner protocol contracts change. > Reviewed `ROADMAP.md`. This improves an existing task-chat surface. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and browser testing. The runtime does not expose a more specific model version or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |