mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-11 21:59:38 +01:00
11f2a5293dddb1f2fa458852c2f6552fa55a86cc
9
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
3a2249dd57 |
fix(runner): retry proven ingress bootstrap failures (#18981)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native execution must retain its admitted model and execution authority during recovery. > - A sandbox provider can reject Runner endpoint acquisition before the Runner gets a credential. > - The old error path loses the structured HTTP status and leaves that startup failure ambiguous. > - A zero counter in an old checkpoint cannot prove that no credential was issued. > - This pull request adds a versioned producer proof and carries closed provider status through the existing RPC. > - A proved transient startup failure uses the existing retry budget. A terminal proved-unused run can settle its accounting. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18018 and #18934. Those changes restore existing checkpoints and ready retained environments. This change covers endpoint acquisition before Runner dispatch. A search of related public PRs found no duplicate implementation. **What happened?** A provider HTTP 502 during Runner endpoint acquisition becomes an untyped worker error. Native recovery treats it as ambiguous and stops without retrying. The run's native usage receipt also stays pending after startup ends without model work. **Expected behavior** Retry a structured transient endpoint failure only when the complete current controller checkpoint proves that this exact run never issued a Runner credential. Preserve authentication, configuration, Stop, ownership and provider-progress gates. Settle zero usage only under the existing terminal accounting owner. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use the controlled endpoint in the Daytona ingress integration test to return HTTP 502. 2. Register the actual native Runner driver and persist its bootstrap journal through the encrypted checkpoint writer. 3. Observe the old terminal ambiguous disposition instead of bounded startup recovery. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on the pre-change master source. The original regression used the production native driver, a real HTTP fault, a real durable control plane and local Postgres. The new contract additionally tests the pinned Daytona SDK and real worker RPC. ## What Changed - The controller owns a v2 persisted state with retained origin and credential history. Current readers still accept v1. Older writers reject v2. Restore and checkpoint decoding do not add missing history. - The proof validates the complete bootstrap journal, all six identity fields and every delivery, credential and progress control. The server rechecks its fingerprint under the current controller claim before retry or accounting changes. - Daytona and the SDK carry a closed acquisition phase and HTTP status through the existing ingress RPC. Both public error wrappers omit response bodies and causes, including Pino cause serialization. - Only structured HTTP 429 or 5xx ingress failures can use the existing three-attempt startup budget. HTTP 401/403, configuration and unknown errors do not gain retry authority. - A terminal proved-unused run wakes existing accounting and records zero provider work. It does not create a semantic result, prove physical termination or release an unknown process/workspace hold. - The normal automatic second attempt rechecks its exact claim, frozen execution and matching complete local/encrypted journal before admitting absent remote Runner state. It keeps the original pending bootstrap command IDs. A proved unused Codex home can rematerialize sealed skills. Full raw local state is checked before streaming-event or policy projection. - Normal saved-state readers and the existing E2E journal evidence matcher accept the closed v1/v2 set. The separate legacy no-launch witness is unchanged. Technical docs describe the contracts. ## Verification Current head: `cd38f70409cdb8664e14bfbf4efa208f468a0419` (final delta adds only fixture artifact preparation). Production files are unchanged from the independently reviewed `93c8a33520` source. Full repository typecheck and build passed at `96417acb58`; the affected server typecheck also passes after the final two-line fixture delta. Focused protocol, raw-proof, real retry, SDK and RPC acceptance pass on this source. Earlier broad suite counts are listed with their limits below: - Durable Runner protocol: 187 tests. - Native executor, driver, startup/accounting and redaction: 1,211 tests, including real Postgres and encrypted checkpoint persistence. - Normal saved-state restore/projection compatibility: 21 focused cases. - SDK: 209 tests. - Standalone Daytona: 544 tests; 8 opt-in live tests skipped. - Explicit standalone `pnpm -C packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona exec vitest run --config vitest.sdk-ingress.config.ts`: 6 cases with real pinned SDK 0.203.0 and worker RPC ingress acceptance. These include lookup 502/401/403/400, private-preview 502 after successful lookup/refresh, missing credentials and private-response exclusion. - E2E journal evidence: 4 cases across both supported formats, with wrong ownership, missing stimulus and unknown-schema controls. - The exact historical controller source rejects a new v2 checkpoint at decode and restore. A v1 control is accepted. This verifies the downgrade fence with the actual older parser. - Startup controls cover issued and pruned credentials, old/truncated journals, provider progress, exhausted retry accounting, and checkpoint/Stop/controller-claim races. Race cases retain the current execution and pending usage. - New exact admission controls: 19 cases through encrypted persistence and cold restore. They cover current/stale/expired claims, Stop, pause, model/trust/account changes, prior progress, issued/pruned credentials, adopted/old/truncated state, local/canonical fingerprint mismatch, hidden delivery, unsupported work and company scope. Two additional red/green cases prove that raw local stream progress and missing event policy are rejected before lossy checkpoint projection. No case mutates run, claim, result or accounting state. - Actual native executor, scheduler and Rust Runner retry: 2 cases. Codex uses its fake app server. OpenCode uses the real proxy and fake OpenCode HTTP server with the frozen DeepSeek model and allow permission configuration. Each path launches no Runner on attempt 1, starts one Runner and provider on attempt 2, reuses both original command IDs, commits one accepted result, validates the persisted local workspace, records nonzero synthetic native usage and settles accounting once. No zero-work accounting flag survives. The controlled SDK and protocol tests use local source, isolated PostgreSQL, a private HTTPS preview and fake provider servers on macOS arm64 with Node 24.22.2. They create no hosted sandbox and make no model call. The root workspace intentionally omits standalone provider dependencies; the explicit SDK target fails if its pinned dependency is absent and has no conditional skip. They do not qualify hosted rollout or repair an old unmarked checkpoint. The first full local typecheck found missing checkout SDK links from an install with scripts disabled; the repository link helper repaired that setup. Current-head Linux CI typecheck and build pass. Independent final review checked 12 source scopes and six raw-proof controls with no remaining finding. Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 with no unresolved thread. The full Runner CI suite found two older control-peer test doubles missing the new proof method. Both now return no proof, with all 27 permission, ordering and cancellation assertions retained and passing. The new Cargo-dependent native retry suite uses the existing Rust-cached CI lane. All 39 lane coverage controls pass and prove complete, duplicate-free suite coverage. The first full test run stopped at an admitted chat Retry polling failure. CI also found a stale retained-allocation fixture, now repaired on master by #18984, and a canceled runner job. A real SDK suite initially relied on a dependency absent from the root workspace; the explicit standalone target now owns that acceptance. The separate Product E2E support run had 12 failures in four untouched files. All 12 reproduce on the original clean base with independent dependencies, compiled base source and verified workspace resolution. These concern workflow expectations, cleanup timeout arguments, a profile snapshot and operating receipts. They are not passing acceptance. The later full local repository test command stopped at a 15-second timeout in the unchanged GitHub pre-allocation retry `controller` case. That exact case passed in isolation with unchanged assertions. The broad Runner run initially omitted `test:typescript:prep` and lacked debug fake-provider binaries. Required preparation then passed 370 + 44 package contract cases (11 skipped); the prepared full package run reported 4,932 passed, 9 failed and 13 skipped. All failed families then passed with unchanged assertions in isolation: 8 ACPX controller tests and 2 credential controls. The paired original-base ACPX control also passed. The full-run failures remain recorded; they are not passing full-suite evidence. The first Rust-cached native CI run found a missing generated OpenCode proxy in a fresh checkout. The fixture now runs the existing verified provider-entrypoint builder. Removing the generated proxy reproduces the exact ENOENT before the fix; both real retry cases pass after the fix from the same absent-artifact state. All current-head CI gates pass, including the aggregate verification check. Linux native CI passes all 10 suites: 177 tests pass and 14 opt-in cases skip. Both real provider retry cases pass. The full Runner package passes 297 suites and 4,950 tests, with 1 suite and 10 tests skipped. The CLI workspace groups pass 4,762 and 286 tests. The first CI attempt had Runner shutdowns in the Runner package, Canary and three general server jobs. One unchanged CLI shard also hit child-server startup and dense ZIP deadlines. Both CLI files passed unchanged in isolation: 18 tests. One bounded rerun of unsuccessful jobs and their dependents passed. The original failures remain recorded. ## Risks - Older controllers reject newly written v2 state on downgrade. Current controllers retain v1 restore support, but old or unmarked state cannot gain this new proof. - An older plugin that omits structured ingress evidence remains held. The server and provider must use the new producer contract for this recovery path. The Docker `cloud` target builds the SDK, server/Runner and standalone Daytona producer from one source tree. The default `production` target does not build the standalone producer. Hosted rollout must confirm the new image and active image-owned plugin worker; a registry version alone does not prove its source. An npm-installed producer needs an explicit matching artifact upgrade. - This prevents future proved startup failures. It does not release historical accounting based on an old checkpoint, change retry budgets, replace a model or weaken sandbox isolation. - Zero model usage is separate from process termination, saved files and resource release. Those owners keep their existing gates. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with tool use and code execution. This runtime does not expose the exact backend model ID or context window to the agent. Read-only independent agents reviewed checkpoint compatibility and SDK/RPC error boundaries. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (affected suites; full local run limits are recorded above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f8484a9f8d |
fix(native): deliver selected skills to remote Codex homes (#18080)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip coordinates company agents and preserves their assigned instructions and approval rules. > - Native runs pin an immutable skill inventory for each execution. > - Built-in remote Codex launches prepare that inventory on the controller, but transfer only authentication, configuration, and the separate context assets. > - Codex needs the selected skills under its isolated home. An explicit skill path does not load a skill outside its registered discovery roots. > - This pull request transfers the sealed selected inventory to the path already used by explicit skill inputs. > - Each launch replaces stale assignments inside the authorized workspace while preserving provider history. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18025. The corrected first-task instructions exist in the selected bundle, but remote Codex must receive those bytes before it can follow them. The legacy skill resolver work in #16646 and #9323 uses different paths and does not repair native remote launch staging. **What happened?** A fresh remote native Codex run could not read its assigned first-task skill. It produced an approval question instead of the required confirmation. The Product E2E journey correctly rejected that question before child creation. **Expected behavior** Codex receives the selected immutable skill at the same provider-local discovery path used by explicit skill input. Removed or unassigned skills do not remain available after a new launch. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Prepare an isolated Codex home with one assigned skill. 2. Run the built-in remote launch staging path against a fresh remote filesystem. 3. Resolve an explicit invocation of that skill. Before the repair, its provider-local file is missing. ## What Changed - Transfer only the prepared selected skill inventory into the isolated remote Codex home before other launch writes. - Reject writable files, symlinks, missing entries, and extra unassigned packages in the controller projection. - Validate each provider-home path component below the authorized workspace. Reject redirected retained paths before deleting stale skills. - Create the private discovery root before native sandbox transfers, which omit the source-root metadata and can ignore the requested directory mode. - Replace stale or empty inventories without changing provider conversation history, preconfigured homes, other providers, or plugin-provided launch preparation. - Exercise the real home materializer and turn resolver through the existing test-only Runner surface. Document the remote discovery contract. - Synchronize an existing Telegram attachment-failure test with the durable provider-effect commit, preserving its required final states. This CI repair is a separate test-only commit. ## Verification - The new production-staging regression failed before the repair because the resolved skill file was absent. - All 23 focused staging checks pass. They cover delivery, file modes, empty/revoked inventories, history retention, extra packages, writable files, source symlinks, target symlinks, redirected ancestors on sandbox/SSH, and an authorized workspace alias. The filesystem fixture packs and extracts actual tar bytes without applying the requested root mode; it preserves exact projected-file digests and executable bits. - The unchanged materializer and prepared-launch contracts passed 26 tests. Eight selected native caller checks passed; other cases in that filtered run were not selected. - Independent probes used official Codex 0.160.0, the real materializer, production staging, the real resolver, and a local model endpoint. The original staging supplied no skill message. The final staging supplied the complete selected skill body with its exact SHA-256. A final probe also ran production Daytona `performSyncIn`, backing only its SDK exec/upload/chmod edge with the local filesystem under umask `022`: the pre-review source reproduced root `0755`, and the final source retained root `0700`, package `0555`, file `0444`, and the exact selected digest. All model requests returned local 403; there were no upstream requests or credentials. - Full local `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on verification commit `e7d4e7a9`, based on `60b8089a`. The full local `pnpm test:run` on that frozen tree was not completed: later embedded PostgreSQL startup failed because the host could not allocate semaphore sets (`semget`, SEMMNI/SEMMNS), and the owned attempt was stopped with its log preserved. Its earlier four caller-fixture failures and one workspace-conflict failure are recorded separately below; the later resource error is not an explanation for them. Delivery commit `567d838d` replayed the initial six-file patch onto `ee67d2ec`; production was last changed in `23456f51`, followed by test-only commits `002fa4a7` and `6e8fa595`. All 24 staging checks, all 26 materializer/prepared-launch checks, and the complete native executor file (968 tests, zero skipped) pass locally. Server typecheck also passed after these test edits. The complete CI matrix passed on `002fa4a7`; current-head CI is tracked separately. - Initial-head CI exposed four caller fixtures that manually wrote auth/config without preparing the skills inventory. The same four failures reproduced locally. Those fixtures now use the real home preparer for their existing empty inventory and assert its transfer; all 34 retained/replacement scenarios and the complete 966-test caller file pass. A sandboxed full-file attempt could not bind local PostgreSQL (`EPERM`); it was stopped with its log preserved, then the identical command passed with local fixture access. Initial-head CI also recorded timeouts in workspace recovery, approval-queue backoff, and heartbeat attribution. Their three complete files pass unchanged locally (102 tests); the next CI head also passed those cases. The original slowdown remains unexplained. The consequent approval cleanup foreign-key failure is a timeout teardown race already recorded in the owning worker documentation. - The frozen full local run also observed an existing workspace-conflict test fail. The test and owning workspace code are unchanged between the verification and delivery trees, and the isolated delivery case passes. The original failure remains unresolved: stopping the later resource-blocked run prevented the final assertion detail from being emitted. That isolated pass does not replace the earlier result. - CI on `23456f51` caught a Telegram test reading `provider_effect=processing` after observing the provider mock call. Production commits `processed` later, so the test now waits for the unchanged complete durable-state assertion. All 18 selected Telegram attachment/media cases pass (the other 1,670 cases were not selected). The same CI attempt also recorded an E2E runner shutdown followed by cancellation, without a failed Playwright assertion; the necessary new test-only head reruns the matrix. Earlier failures remain preserved and are not reported as passes. - Review requested an executor-level preconfigured-home negative test. Retained and replacement workspace cases now drive the actual launcher, assert successful context staging, and exclude the isolated home's skills/auth/config transfers. A counterfactual that removes only the executor exclusion makes both tests fail; the exact production bytes were restored before the complete 968-test pass. Flat and nested selected package delivery is also covered. Optional arbitrary remote-stderr expansion is deferred; the repair keeps the existing closed error code and report surface. - Final head `6e8fa595` passes the complete CI matrix, including typecheck, build, Runner, browser, and aggregate gates. Two first-attempt jobs were interrupted by runner shutdown/lost communication; one unchanged-head rerun of those jobs and their aggregates passed. The underlying host interruption cause remains unknown. Both current-head automated reviews are 5/5 with the implemented finding resolved. - The original checked-in lockfile fails a fresh frozen install on the baseline. The repository's maintained resolution-then-frozen sequence passes. No lockfile change is included. - Independent source review found and then verified the retained-ancestor guard. This PR does not claim that the full live Cloud onboarding campaign has passed. It changes no journey assertion or approval gate. ## Risks Launch preparation adds an asynchronous inventory walk, one bounded remote cleanup command, and one transfer of the selected skill tree. Those costs grow with selected files and bytes and occur only at provider launch. A failed validation, cleanup, or transfer prevents launch. Remote Node is already required by the shared SSH/sandbox launcher. The selected packages remain read-only; the private discovery root retains Codex's normal writable mode. No database, API, credential-routing, or deployment change is included. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex based on GPT-6, with reasoning, source inspection, tool use, and code execution. The host does not expose the exact serving model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
063a498b54 |
Bound native OpenCode assigned-tool catalog projection (#17740)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native agents use assigned connection tools through a governed gateway. > - OpenCode received the gateway catalog directly, outside the bounded server tool projection. > - A large catalog can exceed a provider grammar compiler's capacity even when it fits the transport limits. > - Synthetic requests reproduced the Fireworks grammar timeout on the configured DeepSeek model. > - This pull request gives OpenCode two assigned-tool discovery and call schemas through the existing server relay. > - The gateway keeps the same grants, validation, approvals, revocation, and audit rules. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native OpenCode run could fail during provider grammar compilation before its first assigned-tool call. OpenCode advertised the full assigned gateway catalog. A synthetic catalog of 741 tool schemas reproduced `Grammar processing took too much time` on Fireworks through OpenRouter with `deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017`. The same model and backend accepted a compact two-tool discovery/call catalog. This reproduces the mechanism; it does not replay a historical private request. **Expected behavior** Assigned-tool discovery must keep provider grammar size bounded. Every call must retain the run's original gateway binding and permissions. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Give a native OpenCode run a large assigned connection catalog. 2. Use a provider that compiles tool schemas into a constrained output grammar. 3. Observe the full catalog in the provider tool surface before this change. 4. After this change, observe only `paperclip_search_assigned_tools` and `paperclip_call_assigned_tool` for assigned tools. Discover and call a permitted tool through its pinned alias. **Paperclip version or commit** Source checkout based on current `master`. **Deployment mode** Native local or sandbox execution with OpenCode 1.18.34. Related work: Refs #14258 (discovery paging), #16678 (local adapter MCP launch), and #17688 (gateway capability advertisement). This change covers native OpenCode catalog projection. ## What Changed - Route native OpenCode assigned tools through the existing server-owned authenticated relay. - Use bounded discovery/call schemas for OpenCode, including small catalogs. Preserve transport capacity checks. - Keep assigned gateway credentials on the controller. Ignore gateway and credential values in tool arguments. - Preserve exact declared MCP operation names through admission and driver dispatch. Resolve transport prefixes only against the closed catalog. Reject unknown or shortened names. - Refresh former OpenCode direct-catalog and shortened-name checkpoints. Keep the existing fingerprints for other providers. - Add local and remote wiring, catalog capacity, alias, scope, work-mode, approval, and revocation tests. - Allow the native test files to use a validated dedicated external test database when embedded PostgreSQL is unavailable. - Document the assigned-tool execution contract. - Bound OpenCode discovery pages to 32 KiB and large-schema chunks to 16K characters. Keep other harness budgets unchanged. - Test medium pages and escaped large schemas through the actual HTTP MCP bridge on the explicit Runner testing surface. ## Verification - Red before the catalog fix: OpenCode did not create the server relay, and forced compact delivery advertised 1 or 741 direct schemas. - Red before the alias repair: HTTP MCP changed declared operation names, and the driver sent `search_assigned_tools` instead of the authorized `paperclip_search_assigned_tools`. - Current repair tests: 112 OpenCode/proxy tests pass, plus one actual Rust/proxy/HTTP MCP regression. Two checkpoint regressions fail with the former scoped revision and pass with the new revision. Other providers keep their prior fingerprints. - The combined QA candidate with this exact PR head passes all 916 native tests and all 113 transport tests on supported Node 24.22. An earlier Node 26.4/macOS run passed the 113 assertions but had an uncaught networking error. That non-clean run remains recorded; its stack matches [the upstream Undici defect](https://github.com/nodejs/undici/issues/5544). No production workaround or error suppression was added. - `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and `git diff --check` pass on `bc41ba72be2195eabeb0d7727227ee0cd02e8532`. The maps structural check passes. - The local `pnpm test:run` attempt stopped after host embedded PostgreSQL initialization failures. The relevant database suites pass with isolated PostgreSQL 18. All repository CI gates, including aggregate `ci / verify`, pass on the current head. - Synthetic live provider comparison: 741 invented schemas produced the exact Fireworks grammar timeout in 20.9 seconds. Two compact invented schemas produced a discovery call in 585 ms on the same model and backend. - The first hosted QA attempt exposed the alias failure described above. On the patched source, a real local Rust runner → proxy → OpenCode 1.18.34 → exact DeepSeek smoke completed discovery, one synthetic gateway read, and `paperclip_finish`, then emitted `turn/completed`. It used the production compact projection and unchanged Rust allowlist. - Two earlier local smoke attempts exposed missing terminal authority and completion-contract fields in the smoke harness. Those failures remain recorded. The corrected ordinary bindings produced the clean result. - Fresh Greptile: 5/5 on `bc41ba72be2195eabeb0d7727227ee0cd02e8532`, with no new actionable findings or unresolved threads. - Hosted QA publication and lifecycle acceptance remain pending. The separate deployed-agent `Paperclip Review` check is also pending; it follows a task that failed on the earlier deployed runtime. - Local OpenCode/OpenRouter acceptance at `bc41ba72`: 530 synthetic tools were authorized and installed. A simple model-ID reply completed in 17.3 seconds with no app calls. A discovery task completed in 37.6 seconds, used the search/call relay, made one upstream call, and returned the exact synthetic value. This is local source acceptance, not a staging sandbox timing comparison. - The large-result review finding has a failing-before/passing-after HTTP MCP regression. Five medium schemas now page without invalid JSON. A large schema with escaped text reconstructs exactly through bounded chunks. All 35 assigned-tool tests and the server typecheck pass after this follow-up. - Final head `d84ce4856a6e65a35ad5fb8b561492598b525f4e`: all CI gates pass. Greptile and Paperclip Review both rate the change 5/5. No review threads remain open. The final full build, server typecheck, and 35 assigned-tool tests pass locally. ## Risks - OpenCode uses discovery before it calls an assigned tool, including for small catalogs. This can add a model turn. - An existing OpenCode provider checkpoint rotates once because it retains the former tool declarations. Paperclip task history remains available. - The historical filtered catalog was not captured. The synthetic comparison proves the failure mechanism, not the exact cardinality of an earlier private request. - No model, provider route, permission, or automatic retry policy changes. ## Model Used The bounded-result follow-up also used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6 family). The exact backend model ID and context-window size were not exposed for that session. It used reasoning, code execution, and tool use. OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` in Codex, with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and source inspection. The runtime does not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
51ad751e0b |
feat(runner): integrate Codex native execution (#12616)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane for teams of AI agents. > - Agent runs currently use direct adapters and their established finalization paths. > - The new runner package needs one production integration before it can execute a real provider through the server. > - That integration must not change direct adapters or expose unsupported providers. > - The rollout must also preserve native runs that were already recorded when the feature flag changes. > - This pull request adds a default-off, Codex-only native execution path and its authority boundary. > - The benefit is a recoverable production vertical slice with explicit compatibility guards. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting server orchestration and adapter selection. **Problem or motivation** The runner package exists, but the server cannot yet start and recover a governed Codex run through it. A careless integration could also route existing direct adapters into the native runtime or lose cancellation and finalization state. **Proposed solution** Add a hidden `paperclip_runner` adapter for Codex. Keep it behind the default-off instance flag. Bind native execution, resume, cancellation, semantic tool authority, and finalization to the recorded company, issue, run, and coordinator identities. Leave every direct adapter on its existing path. **Alternatives considered** A multi-provider launch was rejected because only Codex has the complete production bridge in this series. Replacing direct adapter execution was rejected because the runner remains experimental. **Roadmap alignment** This work supports governed tool access, action attribution, and self-healing runs. It keeps the integration narrow and default-off. ## What Changed - Add the Codex-only native session executor and persisted resumption path. - Add run-scoped semantic tool projection, authorization, receipts, and idempotency. - Add audited native cancellation with durable issue and coordinator binding. - Add result fencing so a recorded result cannot reacquire the provider and run twice. - Reject fresh runner starts when the rollout flag is off while preserving recorded native recovery. - Keep direct adapters outside native status, cancellation, record creation, and finalization. - Add focused conformance, recovery, cancellation, status, portability, and compatibility coverage. ## Verification - GitHub Actions is the authoritative test environment for this large stack. - The PR policy and lightweight stack checks run while this is a middle PR. - The full required suite runs when this PR becomes the lowest unmerged or top PR. - Greptile will review this exact delta after the branch is pushed. ## Risks - The main risk is routing a legacy adapter into native execution. Runtime selection and heartbeat tests cover that boundary. - The next risk is stale or cross-company cancellation. Durable binding checks and transactional audit persistence cover it. - The adapter remains hidden and default-off. Only Codex is admitted. - There are no database migration, lockfile, or GitHub workflow changes in this PR. ## Stack 1. [Runner package, SDK, and developer tools](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12608) 2. This PR: Codex production server integration 3. [Provider-neutral task-thread UI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12617) ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5, extended reasoning, repository tools, and parallel review agents. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
560e7e48b5 |
feat(runner): add SDK and developer tooling (#12608)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The runner package already provides the production protocol and execution spine. > - Contributors still need stable SDK surfaces, deterministic test tools, and local inspection tools. > - Those surfaces share generated contracts and must change as one package boundary. > - This pull request adds the package-local SDK, labs, examples, and drift checks. > - The benefit is a reviewable developer platform that does not change application execution selection. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** `packages/paperclip-runner` — runner SDK, conformance tools, and developer tooling. **Problem or motivation** The production runner spine is present, but package consumers cannot build deterministic integrations, inspect sessions, or verify provider-neutral behavior through supported surfaces. **Proposed solution** Add browser, React, standalone, live-session, scenario, conformance, and evaluation surfaces. Add generated contract inventories and package-local verification scripts. Keep production application routing unchanged. **Alternatives considered** We considered splitting each generated catalog, SDK surface, and demo into separate pull requests. Those changes share exports, fixtures, and drift gates. Splitting them would create intermediate package states that do not build. **Roadmap alignment** No overlapping item appears in `ROADMAP.md`. This work extends the runner package that is already on `master`. ## What Changed - Add browser, React, standalone, live-session, and issue-thread SDK surfaces. - Add deterministic mock control-plane, scenario, conformance, replay, and evaluation tools. - Add bounded Codex, OpenCode, and ACPX development transports and fixtures. - Keep deferred managed-provider execution fail-closed. Persisted compatibility data remains readable. - Add generated capability inventories with their source files and drift checks. - Add examples, package documentation, browser checks, and clean-consumer checks. - Preserve the reviewed protocol bounds, replay compatibility aliases, process environment isolation, and semantic redaction limits. - Update the ACPX package patch that the existing workspace patch registry already tracks. - Do not change `pnpm-lock.yaml`, repository workflows, server runtime selection, or the application UI. ## Verification GitHub Actions is the verification authority for this pull request. The repository CI, package TypeScript and Rust checks, package tests, generated-output drift checks, browser checks, security scans, and Greptile review must pass on the exact head. Local test suites were not run because this series uses parallel GitHub Actions for verification. ## Risks This is a large greenfield package change. The main risks are public export drift, generated-output drift, and optional React consumer compatibility. Package boundary checks, clean-consumer checks, and browser tests cover those risks. Production adapter selection and server execution are outside this pull request. ## Stack 1. **This PR:** runner SDK and developer tooling. 2. [Codex production server integration](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12616). 3. [Provider-neutral task-thread UI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12617). ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, high-reasoning mode, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the feature request template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
300b7f4b7e |
Add deterministic capability control plane (#12355)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Semantic operations need a control plane that owns authorization and state changes > - Conformance tests need this authority without a live server or database > - The existing in-memory port covers transport facts but not capability-governed domains > - This pull request adds a deterministic capability-aware control plane for tests > - It keeps the implementation behind the package testing entry point > - The benefit is repeatable authorization and mutation tests before production wiring lands ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** packages/paperclip-runner testing and semantic capability contracts **Problem or motivation** Later semantic action slices need deterministic company, actor, task, governance, workspace, secret, budget, routine, and audit state. A live Paperclip server would make those tests slow and environment-dependent. **Proposed solution** Add serializable capability fixture types and an in-memory control-plane adapter. Enforce company scope, claims, roles, idempotency, redaction, faults, and audit records. Export the adapter only from the testing entry point. **Alternatives considered** The tests could mock each action separately. That would duplicate authorization rules and would not verify state transitions across multiple actions. **Roadmap alignment** This supports the existing experimental Paperclip Runner rollout. It does not enable production semantic operations or change app execution. ## What Changed - Add deterministic capability fixture types and seed state. - Add an in-memory capability control-plane adapter. - Enforce run, company, actor, claim, role, and idempotency boundaries. - Model governed task, document, interaction, workspace, secret, routine, and audit changes. - Add deterministic tests and testing-entry-point exports. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner test:typescript` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner typecheck:typescript` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - The branch changes 5 files relative to its declared base. ## Risks The main risk is a permissive mock that hides a production authorization error. The adapter fails closed for missing claims, wrong roles, cross-company access, duplicate mutations, invalid state, and restricted secret access. Tests cover each fixture domain and serialized restore behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, `gpt-5`, with agentic reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked an existing public issue or described the issue in-PR - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
773d357d8a |
Add deterministic runner conformance core (#12354)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The runner needs repeatable tests at the provider and control-plane boundaries > - Network services and live providers cannot produce deterministic conformance results > - Small in-memory adapters can exercise the same public contracts without production side effects > - This pull request adds a deterministic harness driver, control-plane adapter, and fixture runner > - It exposes these helpers only from the testing entry point > - The benefit is stable cross-boundary verification for later runtime changes ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** packages/paperclip-runner testing and conformance support **Problem or motivation** The public runner contracts have unit tests, but later provider and server slices need a deterministic way to exercise session, event, replay, checkpoint, and result behavior together. **Proposed solution** Add in-memory implementations of the harness-driver and control-plane ports. Add a canonical conformance fixture and runner. Export these utilities only from `@paperclipai/paperclip-runner/testing`. **Alternatives considered** The tests could start a real provider or server. That would make the conformance gate slower, less portable, and dependent on credentials or network state. **Roadmap alignment** This supports the existing experimental Paperclip Runner rollout. It does not enable a production adapter or change current app execution. ## What Changed - Add a deterministic harness-driver implementation. - Add an in-memory control-plane adapter with replay and checkpoint support. - Add a canonical provider-neutral conformance fixture. - Add a reusable conformance runner and contract tests. - Export the helpers from the package testing entry point only. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner test:typescript` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner typecheck:typescript` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - The branch changes 10 files relative to its declared base. ## Risks Low risk. This pull request adds test-only adapters and conformance helpers. It does not select a runtime or change production behavior. Contract tests verify event identity, replay, checkpoints, and deterministic results. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, `gpt-5`, with agentic reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked an existing public issue or described the issue in-PR - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
d18e281c33 |
Add the native runner session runtime (#12352)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Paperclip Runner package needs one provider-neutral session loop > - Native execution contracts now define the accepted input and output > - Backends still need bounded execution, recovery, and control-plane ports > - This pull request adds that package-local session runtime > - It does not change server runtime selection or start the experimental runner > - The benefit is a tested execution core for later provider and server layers ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** packages/paperclip-runner **Problem or motivation** The runner contracts do not yet have a shared session loop. Each backend would otherwise duplicate event handoff, terminal handling, recovery cursors, timeouts, and checkpoint behavior. **Proposed solution** Add the native session runtime, backend interfaces, control-plane port, harness driver contract, deterministic conformance helpers, and bounded tests. **Alternatives considered** The server could own this loop. That would mix provider process behavior with server persistence and authority logic. **Roadmap alignment** This is part of the existing experimental Paperclip Runner rollout. It does not enable a production adapter. ## What Changed - Add a provider-neutral native session execution loop. - Add recovery cursor reconciliation and checkpoint hooks. - Add bounded timeout and governed-wait behavior. - Add harness driver and control-plane conformance helpers. - Add deterministic backend and session runtime tests. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner test:typescript` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner typecheck:typescript` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - Protocol generation and manifest checks pass. - The branch changes 14 files relative to its declared base. ## Risks The main risk is a session that hangs, duplicates an event, or restores the wrong cursor after reconnect. Tests cover terminal events, timeouts, durable handoff, duplicate receipts, recovery, continuity breaks, and checkpoint updates. The change remains package-local. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, `gpt-5`, with agentic reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ffff1fe6e3 |
feat(runner): define package API and verification boundary (#12129)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The runner package now has protocol, transport, provider, catalog, and authorization foundations. > - Its first upstream package boundary should expose only the implemented runtime and test-helper surfaces. > - Rust correctness belongs in the repository existing build verification, without introducing a parallel release process. > - Direct package creation must build the files declared by the package manifest. > - This pull request defines the minimal package API and verifies the optimized runner binaries in the existing PR and release Build jobs. > - The benefit is a production-ready runner package boundary with minimal build-process change. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11962 This pull request replaces one bounded part of the archived large runner change. It follows the package-local authorization change in #12126. ## What Changed - Export only `@paperclipai/paperclip-runner` and `@paperclipai/paperclip-runner/testing`. - Keep Node-only fixture loading and semantic conformance helpers out of the runtime root. - Add a provider-neutral semantic conformance kit with stable JSON comparison and fail-closed input checks. - Keep deferred SDK, eval, browser, React, lab, and command surfaces private. - Pin the runner Rust toolchain to 1.97.1 with the minimal profile and `rustfmt`. - Run the Rust workspace tests in release mode. - Launch the optimized `paperclip-runnerd` and fake-harness binaries in process-level integration coverage. - Add one `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:all` step to each existing PR and release Build job. - Make the existing server `prepack` lifecycle run its existing build after it prepares UI assets. - Document that no production adapter starts runnerd yet. This revision adds no standalone GitHub Actions job. It adds no server runner dependency or runner vendoring. It adds no Docker bootstrap or clean-consumer harness. It does not change `pnpm-lock.yaml`. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:all` - 66 TypeScript tests - 8 protocol contract tests - 56 Rust unit and integration tests - Release-mode integration coverage launches the optimized runnerd and fake-harness binaries. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/server-package-build-script.test.ts` (2 tests) - Clean `pnpm pack` from `server/` rebuilt the server and produced both `package/dist/index.js` and `package/dist/index.d.ts`. - `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs` (8 tests) - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `git diff --check` - No `pnpm-lock.yaml` diff. - The diff changes 12 files. ## Risks The runner adds Rust work to the existing Build jobs. These jobs can take longer on a cold cache. The pinned toolchain makes contributor and CI behavior reproducible. Cargo tests use `--release` to verify optimized executables. The server prepack lifecycle now performs the build that its published entry points require. This can make direct server packing slower. This pull request does not wire runnerd into the server. It does not select runnerd for any adapter. Existing application execution and finalization paths remain unchanged. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. Agentic coding mode used repository tools, code execution, and automated tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |