2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5	97953e9b59	fix(ci): repair the weekly test-weight refresh and extend it to e2e and Runner lanes (#19650) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Contributors wait for PR CI before merge, so CI wall-clock time sets the pace of work > - CI test shards are balanced with per-file durations that a weekly workflow refreshes > - The weekly refresh has failed since 2026-11-02, and the e2e weights have not been measured since 2026-09-15. Today e2e shards 3 and 6 take 7.0–7.7 minutes of tests, and shard 1 takes 4.3 minutes > - A single file can also grow until it sets the time of its shard, and nothing tells us about it > - This pull request repairs the refresh, extends it to the e2e and Runner package lanes, and warns about test files over 180 seconds > - The benefit is balanced shards that stay balanced, and early notice of oversized test files ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The weekly refresh of the test-duration weights that balance CI shards. **Subsystem affected** CI: `scripts/ci/refresh-test-durations.mjs`, `.github/workflows/ci-test-durations.yml`, and the Vitest and Playwright CI reporters. **Current behavior** - The 2026-11-02 refresh (run 41408033686) failed. `gh api …/logs` now refuses output that contains terminal escape sequences. - Most successful `cloud-readiness.yml` master runs are admission-only and have no server jobs. The script took the newest 2 runs, so it would fail with "No server timing jobs found" on most weeks. - The e2e weights (`scripts/e2e-shard-durations.json`) have no refresh and are from 2026-09-15. - No signal tells us when one test file becomes too slow. **Proposed behavior** The refresh runs again, selects master runs that ran the server jobs, refreshes the e2e and Runner package-lane weights from merged PRs, and lists oversized files. CI writes a warning for each test file over 180 seconds. **Reason and benefit** Unbalanced shards add minutes to every PR. The current e2e weights put 472 seconds on the slowest shard. The new weights put about 300 seconds on each shard. **Breaking changes** None. Weights change only shard placement, never which tests run. ## What Changed - Add `scripts/ci/gh-api.mjs`. It always passes `--allow-escape-sequences`, retries without the flag when an older `gh` does not know it, and strips ANSI codes from logs. - `scripts/ci/refresh-test-durations.mjs`: - scans up to 50 master runs and uses the 2 newest that ran the server jobs; - adds the `--dry-run`, `--pr-body=<path>` and `--lanes=server,e2e,runner` options; - validates every lane before it writes a file. If a merged-PR lane has fewer than 2 valid runs, it keeps the current weights and writes a warning. - Add `scripts/ci/pr-run-durations.mjs`. It uses the final passing `pr.yml` run of each merged PR, and it validates: - the PR is merged into `master`; - the merge commit is in the checkout; - the run's head SHA is the PR's final head SHA; - every shard of the run succeeded. It parses Playwright per-spec times and Runner per-file times. - Add `scripts/ci/oversized-test-files.mjs` (Vitest) and `scripts/ci/oversized-test-files-playwright.mjs` (Playwright). In GitHub Actions they write a `::warning` for each test file over `PAPERCLIP_CI_OVERSIZED_TEST_FILE_SECONDS` (default 180). They never fail a job. The root and Runner Vitest configs and the e2e Playwright config load them. - `scripts/ci/test-timing-reporter.mjs`: move the per-file duration calculation into an exported `moduleDurationMs()` helper. The behavior does not change. - `.github/workflows/ci-test-durations.yml` and `.github/ci-duration-pr.md`: - the bot PR can also update the e2e and Runner manifests; - the PR body lists oversized files; - the verify step also runs the new tests and the e2e shard tests. - Refresh `scripts/e2e-shard-durations.json`: 56 of 56 specs measured (before: 30), from merged PRs #19613, #19191 and #19176. The file now uses the shared schema with `sources` and `coverage`. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/ci/test-selection-pr-timings.test.mjs scripts/ci/test-selection-timings.test.mjs scripts/__tests__/e2e-shard.test.mjs`: 32/32 pass. These include the e2e shard balance check with the new weights. - `node scripts/ci/refresh-test-durations.mjs --dry-run` against real GitHub data, all lanes: | Manifest | Measured | Sources | | --- | --- | --- | | `general-server-shard-durations.json` | 1488/1534 files | master runs 42296943853, 42294279748 | | `serialized-shard-durations.json` | 167/167 files | the same two runs | | `e2e-shard-durations.json` | 56/56 specs | PR runs 42296374365, 42297700476, 42296994179 | | Runner `vitest-lane-durations.json` | 310/311 files | the same three PR runs | - e2e placement over 8 shards, with the new medians as the real costs: - with the old weights, the slowest shard has 472 seconds; - with the new weights, every shard has about 300 seconds. - The dry run lists 12 files over 180 seconds. The largest is `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts`, at 636 seconds. - In this PR, only the e2e weight file changes. The weekly run refreshes the server weights. The Runner manifest is added by #19646. ## Risks - The `--allow-escape-sequences` path ran only in unit tests. The local `gh` did not support the flag, so the real dry run used the fallback. The next weekly run is the first real test of the flag. - The changes to the bot-PR shell steps did not run in Actions yet. - The e2e weights come from 3 PR runs. Real shard times vary more than the estimate. - This PR and #19637 both edit the `reporters` lists in `vitest.config.ts` and `packages/paperclip-runner/vitest.config.ts`. The second PR to merge needs a small merge resolution. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use and code execution. A Claude sub-agent wrote the change, and the parent session reviewed it. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-06 15:50:02 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip	e40de0c9e8	perf(ci): refresh test weights and narrow graph dependencies (#18464) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Contributors need fast, reliable CI feedback. > - Diff-aware CI selects test files and partitions them into runner jobs. > - Stale cost estimates put several slow suites on the same runner. Broad imports also couple small tests to large modules. > - This PR refreshes test costs, runs independent graph discovery in parallel, and narrows three dependency boundaries. > - Selection safeguards and CODEOWNER-only AWS routing stay in force. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18398. This follows the audit of [PR #18427's verification run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41169978784). The audit found 403 selected general-server files without timing weights. Three suites measured at 232s, 122s and 116s shared one shard because each received a roughly 2s fallback weight. Local graph discovery across four projects took 43.7s serially and 21.7s with two workers. A reverse-order repeat took 37.7s serially and 22.6s with two workers. Both comparisons produced identical selection results. This is a local measurement, not a claim about production CI speed. ## What Changed - Refresh general-server costs for 1,285 of 1,309 current files and serialized costs for all 163 files from two successful protected-master Cloud readiness runs. Retain prior costs for unmeasured files, including dedicated chat and native-runner suites. - Record passing server file costs, including collection, setup and environment preparation. A weekly hosted workflow validates trusted source runs and opens a timing-only PR. It tests shard coverage, pauses while a refresh PR is open, and never merges automatically. - Discover at most two project graphs concurrently in isolated, heap-limited Node processes. Cache repeated inventory reads within one selection. Worker errors and timeouts retain the full task plan. - Fetch only the merge commit and parents for the selector. A real shallow-clone regression proves the complete diff still includes more than 300 files, renames and deletions. - Share the identical log viewer and run details between both AgentDetail pages. The viewer test imports the shared implementation and runs each of its 13 distinct cases once. - Extract the pure API error class while preserving the API client's public exports. Import delivery work signals through their existing narrow DB export. ## Verification - PASS: `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`. - PASS: 284 CI selection, timing, shallow-diff, sharding and routing tests. - PASS: 74 further cache, routing and graph-proof tests. - PASS: 94 targeted UI assertions across the viewer, run invocation, API errors/client and progress helpers. All 76 assertions in the 12 server suites made independently selectable also pass. - PASS: `pnpm check:token-gates`, module-boundary checks, YAML parsing and `git diff --check`. - PASS: [Full PR CI and required `ci / verify` aggregate](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41206683345), including all 12 general-server shards, all nine serialized shards, workspace groups, chat suites, Runner lanes and build checks. - PASS: [GitHub hosted real-workspace selector and cache/routing qualification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41206683205). - PASS: Both Greptile and Paperclip reviews are 5/5 with no actionable findings or inline comments on `7dc65c51b8`. The PR has no merge conflicts. - PASS: The production refresh parser accepted all 107 structured file-cost records from a real successful server CI job, including setup/loading cost. - Local `pnpm test:run` completed all six chat shards successfully. The duplicate monolithic local run was stopped after the complete remote suite passed; it was not completed locally. The focused log-viewer command improved from 18.84s (26 duplicate variant cases) to 8.49s (all 13 distinct behavior cases). The dependency audit confirms 12 server files and the API-error test no longer need conservative always-run retention. Repartitioning the audited PR with the new costs changes the slowest shard from 810s to 591s of summed historical test execution (1,124 of 1,142 files measured). This is a workload simulation, not measured new CI wall time. ## Risks - Two graph processes use more peak memory. Each has a 2 GiB heap limit and a three-minute timeout. Any failure preserves the original task plan. Real workspace qualification runs in GitHub CI. - Historical logs contain test/hook costs only. New reporter records add loading/setup costs after merge. The manifests identify measurement coverage and source runs. These weights change placement, never permission to skip tests. - Runner load adds timing noise. The refresh uses medians and requires at least 90% measurement coverage in each lane. - GitHub may require approval to run checks on a PR created with `GITHUB_TOKEN`. Refreshes remain reviewable and do not merge themselves. - The shared viewer is a mechanical extraction. Both pages retain their existing exports, and the behavior assertions remain covered. AWS runner authorization is unchanged. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with repository inspection, reasoning, code execution and GitHub tools. The exact deployment ID and context-window size were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks and six chat shards; complete suite passed in CI as detailed above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 11:05:12 -05:00