PaperClipAI

0 Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git synced 2026-10-06 10:48:12 +02:00

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	8ee8f1fd6e	ci: retire recurring public cloud image builds (#13827 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Core publishes standard images and source verification for downstream services. > - Managed services can now compose private images from the signed standard image. > - Core still builds a second public cloud image on every master push and release. > - That duplicate producer consumes build capacity and retains an obsolete readiness contract. > - This pull request retires recurring cloud publication while preserving the standard producer and rollback artifacts. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13797 and #13789. Related: #12856 changes image dependency packaging; it does not retire this producer. What existing behavior does this improve? Core's recurring Docker publication and Cloud readiness workflow. Current behavior Master pushes call the legacy cloud publisher from Cloud readiness. Release tags and manual Docker runs call it too. Canary promotion also requires the legacy image. Proposed behavior Publish standard Core images and retain `Cloud source verified v1`. Let downstream services build their managed image. Keep explicit commit previews and existing images available. ## What Changed - Remove `docker-cloud.yml`, its master and release callers, and its unused cache selector. - Remove the legacy image/migrator wait and `Cloud deployable v1` job. Keep the full source verification workflow and exact source-proof name. - Make canary promotion inspect and promote the standard image only. - Preserve signed standard-image publication, direct migrator publication, and explicit `release.yml` previews. The preview path still uses the Dockerfile `cloud` target. - Update workflow, preview, build-stamp, and packaging tests. Exercise the promotion shell with mocked registry commands, including missing-image and missing-tag cases. - Document frozen legacy aliases, consumer requirements, preview compatibility, and rollback retention. ## Verification - All 377 workflow tests pass: `node --test .github/scripts/tests/.test.mjs`. - All 129 release-registry tests pass: `pnpm test:release-registry`. - Focused source-proof, standard-image, preview, and workflow tests pass: 256 tests. - Focused image packaging/build-stamp tests pass: 16 tests. - Actionlint passes on all three changed workflow files. `git diff --check` passes. - Full local `pnpm build` and `pnpm -r typecheck` pass. - The policy follow-up updates an old assertion that required the removed readiness job. All 37 source-proof/release-workflow tests pass locally. - Full local `pnpm test:run` did not complete successfully while the Mac ran out of disk space. No full-suite pass is claimed. Removed 1.2 GiB of generated Cargo output from this isolated worktree with `cargo clean`. GitHub CI passed on the final head: 52 successful checks and 2 optional skips. - Fresh Greptile review for `4f5fe1951f0bd7f7739cf6655d395ff78f1ed944`: 5/5, successful current-head check, zero review threads. - September 23 refresh: the unchanged PR head merges cleanly with current master `db8f8fe5b73a2697684a30261b0d306a9c631aba`. In an isolated temporary worktree, all 377 workflow tests and 29 release/preview tests pass on the combined tree. `git diff --cached --check` passes. - Refreshed Actionlint workflow validation passes with ShellCheck disabled. Full Actionlint reports the same 10 existing ShellCheck diagnostics as master, with no added diagnostics. No source changes or new PR commits were needed. - The full local build/typecheck and current-head Linux CI results above remain the verification for the unchanged PR head. They were not rerun for this metadata-only refresh. No image publication or tenant deployment was initiated for this refresh. ## Risks Deployment prerequisite satisfied (September 23):* The combined cleanup release is deployed to staging and production, and production Support is verified. Active managed-fleet automation uses standard-image composition. Explicit immutable previews remain supported by the retained preview publisher. This PR is ready for maintainer review; keep auto-merge disabled and wait for explicit merge authorization. - A consumer still selecting `Cloud deployable v1` will stop advancing at the last legacy-ready commit. Confirm active automatic consumers use the standard-image composition contract before merge. - Legacy cloud release-channel aliases stop advancing. Standard self-hosted aliases continue. - This PR deletes no registry images, cache tags, migrators, credentials, or runner infrastructure. Existing immutable releases remain usable for rollback. - Explicit legacy previews remain for commit-specific operator deployments. Retiring that compatibility path requires a separate consumer migration. - These changes affect CI publication, not database schema or application behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The runtime does not expose a more specific model identifier or context-window size. Used repository inspection, reasoning, code editing, shell tools, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-09-23 19:35:19 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	e3d8fb0876	feat: attest standard production images at full source commits (#13797 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Operators deploy its standard production container on several CPU architectures. > - Downstream image builders need to identify the exact source of their base image. > - A short commit tag does not provide signed source evidence. > - This pull request adds a full commit tag and signed image digest for canonical master pushes. > - Consumers can verify the source and compose from the immutable digest. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Publication of the standard multi-platform production image. Current behavior The Docker workflow publishes short commit tags and channel tags. It does not provide a signed standard-image contract tied to the complete master commit. Proposed behavior Canonical master pushes also publish `sha-<full-commit>` and attest the exact index digest after platform validation and an immutable-image orphan-reaping check. The signer certificate binds the source repository, commit, workflow and ref. Existing tags and the separate cloud producer remain available. Reason and benefit Downstream builders can prove the source of a standard base without adding their dependencies or repository details to the public workflow. No matching open issue or duplicate PR was found. ## What Changed - Add the canonical full-SHA tag without changing existing tag mappings. - Validate amd64 and arm64 descriptors and hash the exact registry response bytes and require its digest header to match. - Verify the immutable image and sign it with GitHub artifact attestations. - Run the contract tests in trusted PR verification and document the consumer contract. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs scripts/cloud-source-verification.test.mjs scripts/standard-image-contract.test.mjs`: 37 passed. - A read-only check against an existing published index returned its exact expected digest. - `actionlint -shellcheck='' .github/workflows/docker.yml .github/workflows/pr-trusted.yml`: passed. Normal ShellCheck reports only existing `ls` and word-splitting warnings. - `pnpm build`: passed locally with Cargo available. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed locally. - Full local Vitest was attempted: 8,260 passed, 14 failed, with 34 failing suites. The failures were missing embedded-PostgreSQL library aliases in this fresh install and existing macOS runtime-skill-cache rename errors. Native aliases are now restored. Rerunning the 33 affected database suites produced 577 passes and two unrelated AgentMail skill-root lookup failures (32 suites passed). The four directly failing database tests also pass independently. This is not a claim that the full local suite passed. - All final-head CI checks pass. One unrelated routine-route mock assertion passed on the single-shard retry; its 15 tests also pass locally. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact head, with no unresolved threads. - Actual signing requires a canonical master push. This draft PR does not publish trusted provenance. ## Risks The new attestation step requires OIDC and attestation write permissions in the merge job. Signing failure leaves the image available but without the new admission proof. Consumers must fail closed when proof is missing. Existing release tags, the legacy producer, and image retention remain unchanged. No database or application behavior changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, shell execution and test tools. The session does not expose a more specific model variant or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-09-22 07:33:30 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	5c660a32f3	ci: build cloud images independently for each merge (#13189 ) Build cloud images independently for each master commit through a reusable workflow. Preserve production release dependencies and image runtime checks, and write cloud registry caches per commit with bounded ancestor imports to prevent overlapping builds from replacing each other's cache. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-09-10 20:42:18 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	399daa1f25	ci: publish verified full-SHA cloud image tags (#13187 ) Publish the full-source-SHA cloud image tag only after the pushed digest passes runtime, revision, and platform checks. This makes verified images directly resolvable by Cloud. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-09-10 20:10:02 -07:00
Tonio Claude Opus 5 Devin Foley	5488a79eb5	ci(docker): build each architecture on a native runner instead of QEMU (#12821 ) ## Thinking Path A fleet rollout failed with `image_manifest_not_found` for a commit that had merged and gone green. Tracing that back: the fleet resolves releases against the `-cloud` image, that image comes from `docker.yml`, and `docker.yml`'s runs on master have been reading `cancelled` for a long stretch. The cloud half was fine; the production half was hanging and taking the run down with it — and, because a run holds the concurrency slot for its whole duration, starving later commits of a build at all. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No tracking issue — described inline, per CONTRIBUTING.md. What's wrong. `build-and-push` builds `linux/amd64,linux/arm64` on an x86 runner, so arm64 runs under QEMU. It hangs there — deterministically, in the same step: ``` #111 [linux/arm64 build 8/10] RUN pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server build ``` …then emits nothing until `timeout-minutes: 60` kills it. Three consecutive runs on 2026-09-04, silent for 38, 43 and 45 minutes respectively. The amd64 leg reached `production 5/5` minutes earlier in every one. Why it stayed hidden. A timed-out job is reported by GitHub as cancelled, not failed. The run conclusion reads "cancelled", which looks like supersession rather than breakage, so the production image quietly stopped publishing. The knock-on. A run that burns the full hour holds the top-level concurrency slot for that hour. `cancel-in-progress: false` keeps exactly one pending slot, so merges arriving faster than one an hour supersede each other while queued. Sampling the last ten master commits, five produced no image at all — their Docker runs have zero job records because they never started. Expected. Both architectures publish, and a commit merged during a busy period still gets an image. ## What Changed `build-and-push` becomes a two-leg matrix, each on a runner of its own architecture: \| platform \| runner \| \|---\|---\| \| `linux/amd64` \| `ubuntu-latest` \| \| `linux/arm64` \| `ubuntu-24.04-arm` \| Each leg pushes by digest (`push-by-digest=true`, untagged), and a new `merge-and-push` job names the digests into one manifest list with the real lane tags. Nothing is publicly tagged until the merge, so a half-published multi-arch image is never a pullable state. Two supporting changes: - Per-arch BuildKit cache refs (`:buildcache-amd64` / `:buildcache-arm64`). Separate runners sharing one ref would overwrite each other on every build. - The PID-1 orphan-reaping check moves to the merge job, since that is where a tagged, pullable image first exists. It still runs against the pushed image rather than a local build, for the same reason as before. arm64 is kept, not dropped. The cloud variant is amd64-only and can be — managed hosts are amd64. This is the self-hosted image and ARM hosts consume it, so dropping arm64 would break them. GitHub-hosted arm64 runners are free for public repositories, which this is. `build-and-push-cloud` is untouched. It was already `platforms: linux/amd64` and has been succeeding in ~14 minutes throughout — that is why `-cloud` images exist at all. ## Verification Parsed the workflow and asserted its shape (jobs, matrix, `needs`, step order, that the cloud job is unchanged). The artifact actions are pinned by SHA with version comments, matching the repo's dominant convention — `upload-artifact` v7 and `download-artifact` v8, the same pins used across the other workflows; v8 is required for the `pattern` / `merge-multiple` inputs the merge job uses. This PR's CI does not exercise the change. `docker.yml` triggers on master and tag pushes, never on pull requests — deliberately, since it publishes release images. The first real run is after merge, so the check is: the next master push produces a `Docker` run whose `build-and-push (amd64)`, `build-and-push (arm64)` and `merge-and-push` jobs all succeed, and whose conclusion is `success` rather than `cancelled`. ## Risks - Not testable before merge, per above. If the matrix is wrong the next master push fails loudly rather than silently — which is already better than the current state, where the failure mode is an invisible "cancelled". - First use of `ubuntu-24.04-arm` in this repo. No other workflow uses an ARM runner. They are free for public repos, but if the label is unavailable the arm64 leg will fail to schedule and the merge will not run — no image, same as today, and visible. - Digest-push changes the publish shape. Between the legs finishing and the merge running, digests exist untagged in ghcr. Anything watching for tags sees no intermediate state; anything enumerating untagged manifests will see more of them. - Cache refs change name, so the first build after this lands is cold on both legs and will be slower than steady state. - Does not fix the underlying QEMU hang — it avoids it. If arm64 ever has to build under emulation again, the same stall is presumably still there. - No application code, schema, server or persistence change. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude — Opus 5, model ID `claude-opus-5`, run through Claude Code. Extended thinking enabled. Tool use throughout: GitHub Actions API to correlate run/job outcomes and read build logs, `git` for ancestry checks, and a YAML parser to validate the rewritten workflow's structure. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge A workflow change has no unit test to add, and `docker.yml` cannot run on a PR; the verification section states what to check on the first master run instead. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@paperclip.ing>	2026-09-09 15:56:28 -07:00
Devin Foley	01ad858492	ci: raise the multi-arch Docker publish timeout to 120 minutes (#13114 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Docker workflow publishes the server images that all deployments pull, including the `sha-` images that downstream consumers deploy > - The `build-and-push` job builds for linux/amd64 and QEMU-emulated linux/arm64, and that build now takes more than its 60 minute job timeout > - Every run dies at the timeout, and each doomed hour-long run holds the per-ref concurrency slot, so queued master pushes supersede each other and no image publishes at all > - This pull request raises the multi-arch job timeout to 120 minutes > - The benefit is that image publishing works again, with headroom for the build to grow ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #12821 replaces the QEMU-emulated arm64 build with native runners — that is the durable fix for the build duration itself. This PR is the immediate unblock so images publish again while #12821 lands. No existing issue for the outage. Description follows the bug report template: What happened?* The `docker.yml` `build-and-push` job hits its 60 minute `timeout-minutes` cap on every run. The last fully successful `docker.yml` run was September 2. Since then almost every run ends `cancelled`: the multi-arch build is killed at the timeout, and runs queued behind it are superseded by newer master pushes before they can start. The amd64-only `build-and-push-cloud` job often still succeeds inside those cancelled runs, which masked the breakage. Expected behavior Every master push and canary tag dispatch publishes its `sha-` production and cloud images, and the `promote_canary_channel` job runs. Steps to reproduce* Look at the runs of the Docker workflow on master: `gh run list --workflow docker.yml --branch master`. Nearly every run since September 5 ends `cancelled` or `failure`. Open a cancelled run: the `build-and-push` job runs for 61+ minutes and its "Build and push" step ends `cancelled` at the job timeout. The last runs that succeeded (September 2) took 39 to 54 minutes for the same job. ## What Changed - Raise `timeout-minutes` on the `build-and-push` job from 60 to 120, with a comment that explains why. The amd64-only `build-and-push-cloud` job keeps its 60 minute cap. ## Verification - `actionlint .github/workflows/docker.yml` reports no issues in this change (only pre-existing info-level shellcheck notes in untouched steps). - Compared job durations across the last successful runs (39-54 minutes) and the recent timeout kills (61+ minutes) to confirm the cap is the failure cause. - After merge, the next master push should produce a `docker.yml` run that completes with both build jobs green. ## Risks Low risk. The change only gives the existing build more time. A genuinely hung build now occupies a runner for up to 120 minutes instead of 60. The slow arm64 emulated build itself is worth a separate look (native arm runners or splitting the platforms), but that is a larger change than this outage fix. ## Model Used Claude (Anthropic) — Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), extended thinking, agentic tool use via Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (no code paths changed; workflow linted with actionlint) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (not applicable for a CI timeout value) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (the workflow comment documents the rationale) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-09-09 14:34:45 -07:00
Devin Foley	8f099c3f83	ci: dispatch a Docker build for every canary tag (#12950 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Every master merge publishes an npm canary, and downstream managed deployments consume the matching `sha-<short>-cloud` Docker image. > - The canary image relies on the master-push `docker.yml` run, whose single pending concurrency slot is superseded by every newer push. > - On a busy day the image build never survives: five consecutive canaries shipped npm packages with no cloud image on 2026-09-06, and downstream deploys starved for ~18 hours while master kept moving. > - The nightly and beta lanes already solve exactly this by dispatching `docker.yml` at their tag ref after pushing it. > - This pull request wires the canary lane into the same mechanism, so every canary tag gets an image build no master push can supersede. > - The benefit is that a published canary always has its images, and downstream release resolution stops walking back to day-old builds during busy merge windows. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12769 / #12855 (the earlier image-publishing incident in the same pipeline, different failure mode). What happened? `docker.yml` serialises per ref with one pending slot (`concurrency: docker-${{ github.ref }}`, `cancel-in-progress: false`). Master pushes arriving faster than the ~50-minute build supersede the pending build indefinitely. On 2026-09-06, canaries `2026.906.0-canary.1` through `.3` (and the commits between) published to npm with no `sha-<short>-cloud` image on GHCR — the Docker run list shows `cancelled, cancelled, cancelled` for their commits. Downstream managed rollouts correctly refused to deploy image-less canaries and pinned at `canary.0` for ~18 hours. Expected behavior Every published canary has its Docker images. A busy merge window must not be able to prevent image publication for tagged releases. Steps to reproduce 1. Merge to master more often than the Docker build takes to complete, for several hours. 2. Observe npm canaries advancing while every `Docker` run for their commits completes `cancelled`. 3. Observe `ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip:sha-<short>-cloud` returning 404 for each of those canaries. Paperclip version or commit Master at `83987210` (diagnosis time); the starved canaries were `2026.906.0-canary.1`–`.3`. Deployment mode GitHub Actions release + image pipeline; consumed by managed cloud deployments. ## What Changed - `.github/workflows/release.yml`, `publish_canary` job: - New step after "Push canary tag": dispatch `docker.yml` at `refs/tags/canary/v<version>` — identical to the nightly and beta lanes' existing step, including the step-summary note. The dispatched run keys its concurrency off the tag ref, so master pushes cannot supersede it, and `docker.yml`'s `type=sha` mapping publishes `sha-<short>` / `sha-<short>-cloud` for any ref. - The job gains `actions: write`, mirroring `publish_nightly`. - No `docker.yml` changes: it already accepts `workflow_dispatch` for exactly this pattern. - No dry-run guard needed: `publish_canary` runs only on `push` events, so the `dry_run` dispatch input cannot reach it. ## Verification - YAML lints clean; the step is a line-for-line mirror of the proven nightly-lane step (tag source swapped for the job's existing `canary_tag` output). - The concurrency claim is docker.yml's own documented behavior: groups are per-ref, and a tag ref is distinct from `refs/heads/master`. - Not run: a live canary publish — the next master merge after this lands exercises it end to end; the worst case (double build for a canary whose master-push run also survives) is benign, since both runs push identical content-addressed tags. ## Risks - Low. Roughly one additional Docker build per canary on busy days (on quiet days the master-push run and the dispatched run both execute — duplicate work, identical images, no conflict since the sha tags are content-equivalent for the same commit). - `actions: write` on `publish_canary` matches the grant `publish_nightly` already carries for the same purpose. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic, model id `claude-fable-5`), extended thinking, agentic tool use in Claude Code: GHCR manifest probing, Actions run-list forensics, and workflow-lane comparison. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (workflow-only change; YAML linted; no test harness targets release.yml) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (not applicable — CI wiring mirroring an existing proven lane) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (the step's inline comment documents the invariant) - [x] I have considered and documented the risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-09-08 16:56:35 -07:00
Dotta	4ef6155aae	ci: harden paid runner browser and lock repair (#12829 ) ## Thinking Path Paid cells now reuse the AWS image's system Chrome, but Playwright video recording still resolves its revision-pinned FFmpeg helper from the Playwright cache. Run 33875618534 proved Chrome qualification succeeds and then failed before provider startup because that helper was absent. The same run also exposed that generic lock repair can churn unrelated package platform metadata, so the automated repair paths need resolution-only regeneration rather than lockfile-only metadata refresh. ## What Changed - install Playwright FFmpeg only on the AWS/system-Chrome path - retry the small helper installation up to three times before provider secrets are exposed - keep the GitHub-hosted Chromium fallback unchanged - bind static coverage to the exact FFmpeg step block and its pre-secret ordering - add pnpm `--resolution-only` to all four automated lock-repair paths while retaining full transitive resolution - require resolution-only repair in the shared workflow regression The actual generated lockfile correction remains bot-owned by PR #12828 and is intentionally not committed here. ## Verification - `node --test .github/scripts/tests/lockfile-refresh-workflows.test.mjs` - `actionlint -ignore SC2012` on all modified workflows - focused Prettier checks - `git diff --check` - prior run 33875618534: system Chrome 151 qualified; missing Playwright FFmpeg was the sole cell startup failure ## Risks Low. The new network operation is limited to Playwright's pinned FFmpeg payload, happens before paid credentials are exposed, and leaves the hosted-runner path unchanged. Resolution-only is still a full dependency-resolution pass, unlike lockfile-only, while avoiding unrelated current-platform metadata churn. ## Model Used GPT-5	2026-09-04 08:58:44 -05:00
github-actions[bot]Dotta Codex lockfile-bot	fa16f88d6b	chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#12771 ) Use full dependency resolution in automated lockfile repair paths, add regression coverage, and refresh the stale Rollup snapshot. Co-Authored-By: Dotta <cryppadotta@users.noreply.github.com> Co-Authored-By: Codex <codex@openai.com> Co-Authored-By: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-09-03 11:08:34 -05:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip	7895f7f2b0	Install the declared Sentry server package into the hosted image (#12330 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip supports opt-in Sentry error monitoring for server and browser errors. > - The hosted image must include the server package when an operator sets SENTRY_DSN. > - The server package is an optional peer in the source tree, so the image did not include it. > - This pull request installs the declared server package in the hosted image and checks the result. > - The benefit is a hosted tenant can send server errors without a manual package install. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists for this change. What happened? The hosted image did not include the declared @sentry/node server package. A hosted tenant could set SENTRY_DSN, but the server could not load the package from the image. Expected behavior The hosted image must include the exact @sentry/node version from server/package.json. The self-hosted image must remain without this optional package. Steps to reproduce 1. Build or pull the hosted image. 2. Resolve @sentry/node from the server package path. 3. Compare its version with server/package.json. 4. Confirm that the tsx loader path still resolves. Paperclip version or commit Commit b6ff556a33ebdbe764b7f495951cd59009776608. Deployment mode Docker hosted image. ## What Changed - Add a cloud-server-deps Docker stage that installs the declared @sentry/node version in isolation. - Copy the isolated package into the cloud image without changing the production image. - Add a probe that checks the tsx loader and the resolved Sentry version. - Run the probe after the hosted image push in the Docker workflow. - Add server tests and update the observability documentation. ## Verification - Run `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/cloud-image-sentry.test.ts`. - Confirm that the changed test passes in CI. - Confirm that all pull request checks pass. - Note that the Docker workflow does not run for pull requests. It runs after a push to master, for configured tags, or after manual dispatch. ## Risks - Low risk. The production image body stays unchanged. - The cloud image adds the declared Sentry package and a small dependency tree. - The workflow probe fails if the image loses the tsx loader or resolves a different Sentry version. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5; exact model version supplied by the execution service; tool use and code execution; context window not specified. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-08-27 19:10:49 -07:00
Zannis Kalampoukisandzannis	5db8ce3c44	fix(docker): make tini PID 1 in the server image so adopted orphans are reaped (#12137 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agent runs execute inside the server container, and they spawn many short-lived descendants: git, the adapter CLI, esbuild, sh > - The server image sets `ENTRYPOINT ["docker-entrypoint.sh"]`, and that entrypoint ends in `exec`, so node becomes PID 1 > - Node reaps only the children it spawned itself. It installs no `SIGCHLD`/`waitpid` handler for orphans that the kernel re-parents onto PID 1, so those orphans stay as zombies forever > - Zombies accumulate monotonically. When the cgroup pid limit is reached, every `fork()` in the container fails and the instance is dead > - This pull request installs `tini` and makes it PID 1 in front of the existing entrypoint, adds a behavioural test that proves reaping, and adds a `pids_limit` backstop to both compose files > - The benefit is that a long-running container no longer degrades into total fork failure, and a future regression is caught by CI instead of by an outage Depends-on: none — this change is self-contained in the image build and its tests, and it touches no other in-flight branch ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this defect. It was found on a live long-running instance. Description follows the bug report template. What happened? The server container ran for 22 hours and reached 2039 of 2048 pids in its cgroup. Of 1760 processes, 1731 were zombies, and all 1731 had PID 1 as their parent. PID 1 was `node --import ./server/node_modules/tsx/dist/loader.mjs server/dist/index.js`. Zombies accrued at about 79 per hour and were never reaped. The oldest zombie was 20.8 hours old against a container uptime of 22.0 hours, so nothing had been reaped since boot. Once the pid limit was reached, `git` and `gh` failed with `pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable`. Expected behavior PID 1 reaps orphaned processes that the kernel re-parents onto it. The pid count of a long-running container stays flat instead of growing without bound. Steps to reproduce 1. Start the server image without `docker run --init` and without `init: true`. 2. Run agent work that spawns descendants which outlive their immediate parent. 3. Read `/sys/fs/cgroup/pids.current` and count processes in `Z` state over several hours. 4. The zombie count grows monotonically and every zombie has PPID 1. Relevant logs or output ``` cgroup pids.current / pids.max : 2039 / 2048 total processes : 1760 zombies : 1731 (98.4%) parent of every zombie : PID 1 (1731/1731) PID 1 cmdline : node --import .../tsx/dist/loader.mjs server/dist/index.js container uptime : 22.0 h oldest zombie : 20.8 h median: 14.4 h zombie names : git 717, claude 280, MainThread 167, sleep 141, esbuild 138, postgres 76, sh 65, sccache 50 ``` Additional context The fix pattern is already in this repository. `docker/agent-runtime/Dockerfile.base` installs `tini` and sets `ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/bin/tini", "--"]`. It was never applied to the server image. ## What Changed - `Dockerfile`: install `tini` in the `base` stage and set `ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/bin/tini", "--", "docker-entrypoint.sh"]`. The entrypoint stays in the exec chain, so UID/GID remapping, `gosu`, and graceful shutdown are unchanged. - `scripts/assert-orphan-reaping.sh` (new): a behavioural probe. It spawns a leader that forks a grandchild, exits the leader, and asserts that the orphaned grandchild leaves `Z` state instead of persisting. It fails closed if the grandchild is not re-parented onto PID 1, so a pass cannot mean the check ran too early. - `.github/workflows/docker.yml`: run that probe against the pushed image after the publish step. The publish step is multi-arch with `push: true`, so nothing is loaded into the runner daemon and the pushed tag is the only thing to test. The cloud variant is `FROM production` and inherits the same `ENTRYPOINT`. - `scripts/docker-build-test.sh`: run the same probe against a local build. - `docker/docker-compose.yml` and `docker/docker-compose.quickstart.yml`: add `pids_limit: 2048` as a backstop, so a future leak dies visibly at its own ceiling instead of starving the host of pids. - `server/src/__tests__/container-init-reaping.test.ts` (new): 13 assertions that guard the configuration the probe depends on. No per-orchestrator init lever was added. The image owning PID 1 covers compose, plain `docker run`, the quadlet units, and the ECS task definition in one place. Adding `init: true` in compose or `initProcessEnabled` on the ECS task would nest a second init around `tini`, and `tini` then warns on every boot that it is not PID 1. The new test asserts the absence of both levers across all three manifests, so the decision survives the next edit. ## Verification \| Check \| Result \| \|---\|---\| \| `scripts/assert-orphan-reaping.sh` against a real init \| Grandchild re-parented to PPID 1, then reaped. Exit 0. \| \| Same probe forced against a genuine zombie \| Reports `Z` and fails. The failure branch is not vacuous. \| \| Config guard against the pre-fix files \| Exactly the 3 relevant assertions turn red. \| \| Config guard with `tini` removed from `apt-get` but the comments kept \| Red. It checks the install, not a mention of the name. \| \| `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/container-init-reaping.test.ts` \| 13 passed \| \| `npx tsc --noEmit -p server` \| Clean \| \| `node scripts/check-docker-deps-stage.mjs` \| PASS \| \| `node --test scripts/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs` \| 8 passed \| Not verified locally: no container runtime is available in the authoring environment, so the probe has not run against a build of this image. The new `docker.yml` step runs it against the pushed image on this PR. ## Risks Low risk, but it is an image and entrypoint change, so it affects deployments. - `tini` adds one small package to the `base` stage. `docker/agent-runtime/Dockerfile.base` already installs it from the same Debian archive. - Signal handling changes shape: `tini` receives `SIGTERM` and forwards it to the entrypoint, which `exec`s node. `tini` forwards signals to its direct child by default, and the exec chain keeps node as that child, so graceful shutdown is preserved. A reviewer should confirm this on a real stop. - `pids_limit: 2048` is new for compose users. A deployment that legitimately needs more than 2048 processes would now hit the ceiling. The measured steady state on a busy instance was under 400. - If a deployment already passes `--init` or `init: true`, `tini` runs under another init and prints a warning that it is not PID 1. Reaping still works because the outer init handles it. The compose files in this repository do not set `init: true`. ## Model Used Claude Opus 5 (`claude-opus-5`), extended thinking, with tool use and code execution in an agent harness. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: zannis <1011451+zannis@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-08-25 09:52:39 -07:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip	38d8f37172	fix(build): enforce Node 24 across Paperclip (#11792 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip runs across the CLI, server, adapters, plugins, CI, and container images. > - These surfaces declared different Node.js versions from 20 through 24. > - A newer `@types/node` major can expose APIs that the supported runtime does not provide. > - Node.js 20 is no longer a suitable project baseline, and Node.js 24 is the current LTS line. > - This pull request sets Node.js 24.11.0 as one repository-wide baseline, adds a drift check, and gives users actionable startup guidance when their runtime is too old. > - The benefit is one clear runtime contract for development, release, installation, and published packages. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #2734 Refs #11727 Refs #739 ## What Changed - Require Node.js 24.11.0 or newer in all 42 package manifests and runtime checks. - Use Node.js 24 in GitHub Actions, Docker images, smoke images, sandbox setup, portable installs, and esbuild targets. - Align every direct `@types/node` declaration on `^24.0.0`. - Prevent Dependabot from opening major `@types/node` upgrades without a matching runtime decision. - Add `.nvmrc` and a CI policy check for Node version drift. - Update ACP version gates, tests, and user documentation for the new minimum. - Print a non-blocking warning on CLI and server startup when Node is unsupported, with remediation through a version manager or the documented downloaded `install.sh` workflow. - Deduplicate that warning when `paperclipai run` boots the CLI and server in the same process. ## Verification - `node scripts/check-node-version-policy.mjs` - `node --check scripts/check-node-version-policy.mjs` - `node --check cli/esbuild.config.mjs` - `node --check scripts/generate-npm-package-json.mjs` - `bash -n scripts/install.sh scripts/test-install-sh-docker.sh scripts/e2e-install-lifecycle.sh` - Parsed all 42 package manifests and confirmed `engines.node` is `>=24.11.0`. - `git diff --check` - `vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-install-command.test.ts` passed with 3 tests. - `vitest run cli/src/node-version.test.ts` passed with 4 tests. - Directly exercised the shared warning helper for unsupported-version messaging and same-process deduplication. - The focused exe.dev suite could not resolve the locally unbuilt plugin SDK from this isolated worktree. A full offline workspace install was also blocked because the package-manager signature verifier requires registry access. The full suite was not run locally; draft CI performs a clean install and evaluates the wider impact. ## Risks - This is a breaking runtime change for users, plugins, and deployments that still use Node.js 20 or 22. - Published workspace packages will now produce an engine warning or failure in strict package managers on older Node.js releases. - Node.js 24 can reveal dependency, native module, Playwright, or agent CLI compatibility issues in CI. - The bootstrap installer now installs Node.js 24 when the current runtime is older than 24.11.0. - The portable sandbox fallback is pinned to Node.js 24.11.0 and depends on that upstream tarball remaining available. - Unsupported runtimes continue booting after a warning, so a later incompatibility can still fail at its point of use. - The CLI and server share the warning policy through the published `@paperclipai/shared` package; packaging checks must keep that subpath export available. - This PR does not commit `pnpm-lock.yaml` because repository policy assigns lockfile generation to CI. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex based on GPT-5. The exact deployment ID and context window are not exposed in this session. Reasoning, repository tools, shell execution, and GitHub tools were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-08-21 10:17:52 -07:00
Devin Foley	8f7b8b3fda	feat(release): add human-gated beta channel with stable soak enforcement (#11008 ) > Follow-up to #11006 (merged): rebased onto master and ready for review. ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The release subsystem now publishes canary (every master push), nightly (scheduled, smoke-gated, added in #11006), and stable (manual) > - There is still no human-approved release-candidate lane between nightly and stable, and nothing enforces that a stable actually soaked anywhere before shipping > - Betas need a real approval gate, and stables need a soak policy that is data, not prose > - This pull request adds the beta channel: a manual promotion of a chosen nightly behind the `npm-beta` environment gate, re-smoked after publish, plus a stable preflight that enforces a 3-day beta soak with a written-justification bypass > - The benefit is a complete canary → nightly → beta → stable train where every stable shipped as a beta first, and emergencies leave a written trace ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Subsystem affected Release automation: `scripts/release.sh`, `scripts/release-lib.sh`, `.github/workflows/release.yml`, `.github/workflows/docker.yml`, `.github/workflows/release-smoke.yml`. Problem or motivation After #11006 the project has canary and nightly prerelease lanes, but no release-candidate lane. Stable promotion has no enforced soak: any ref can ship as stable directly. There is no approval boundary for a broader-audience prerelease, and no structured way to record why an emergency release skipped validation. Proposed solution Add a `beta` channel: a manual dispatch that promotes a chosen nightly's source commit, publishes behind the `npm-beta` GitHub environment (required reviewers are the gate), re-smokes the published beta, and tags `beta/vX`. Enforce in the stable path that the source commit shipped as a beta at least 3 days earlier (measured from the beta's npm publish time), with a `skip_soak_justification` input as the recorded emergency bypass. Alternatives considered Codifying the soak policy in docs only. Rejected: an unenforced policy decays; the preflight makes the policy executable while the justification input keeps the emergency path usable and auditable. ## What Changed - `scripts/release.sh` + `scripts/release-lib.sh`: `beta` channel — requires HEAD to carry a `nightly/v` tag, publishes the package set as `YYYY.MDD.P-beta.N` under dist-tag `beta`, tags `beta/vYYYY.MDD.P-beta.N` - `.github/workflows/release.yml`: - `channel: beta` dispatch path: `select_beta` resolves the newest (or an explicit `source_version`) nightly and fails loudly on selection problems; `publish_beta` runs behind the `npm-beta` environment, pushes the tag, and dispatches `docker.yml`; `smoke_beta` re-runs the release smoke suite against the exact published beta version - stable path: new `preflight_stable` job enforces the 3-day beta soak from the beta's npm publish time; `skip_soak_justification` bypasses with the reason echoed into the job summary; dry runs report without blocking - `.github/workflows/docker.yml`: `beta/v` tags publish `:beta` on both images, with exact version stamping - `.github/workflows/release-smoke.yml`: `beta` added to the dispatch choice list - Docs: `CHANNELS.md` beta entries; `RELEASING.md` beta lane, soak gate, and failure playbook; `RELEASE-AUTOMATION-SETUP.md` `npm-beta` environment setup, including the warning to create the environment before the first beta dispatch (GitHub auto-creates unprotected environments on first reference) - Tests: beta version-counting coverage in `scripts/release-registry-versions.test.mjs`; beta identity and nightly-tag guard coverage in `scripts/__tests__/release-dry-run-notes.test.mjs` ## Verification - `node --test` on the two touched suites: 17 pass, including the 3 new beta tests - `bash -n` on both shell scripts and YAML parse of all three workflows - After merge, in order: create the `npm-beta` environment, dispatch `channel: beta` with `dry_run: true` to preview, then a real promotion of a published nightly through the approval gate, then a stable dry-run against a young beta to see the soak gate report ## Risks - If the `npm-beta` environment does not exist when the first beta dispatch runs, GitHub creates it with no protection rules and the beta publishes without approval. Mitigated by documentation and by creating the environment before merge (operator step) - Until the first beta exists, every stable dispatch requires `skip_soak_justification`. This is deliberate — the first beta ships immediately after this merges — but it is a behavior change to the stable dispatch - The soak clock reads the beta's npm publish time from the registry; a registry outage makes the preflight fall back to requiring justification (fail-closed) ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Anthropic) in Claude Code, with extended thinking and full tool use (repository exploration, local test execution, live registry and git verification). All code, tests, and docs in this PR were model-authored under human direction. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending — will confirm before merge) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (pending — will confirm before merge) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-08-10 16:52:59 -07:00
Devin Foley	f9173782cd	feat(release): add smoke-gated nightly channel and lane-separated Docker tags (#11006 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The release subsystem publishes the `paperclipai` npm package set and the Docker images on two lanes: canary on every master push, and stable on manual promotion > - There is no middle ground between those lanes. Users must track every merge or wait weeks for a stable. Docker `:latest` also tracks master, so Docker users have no stable image at all > - A calm prerelease lane needs to exist, and it must never ship a build that failed its checks > - This pull request adds the nightly channel: a scheduled job that selects the newest master commit with a green canary publish, runs the full release smoke suite against that exact published canary, and only then republishes it as the nightly. It also separates Docker tags by lane, so `:latest` finally means stable > - The benefit is that users can follow prereleases at a nightly cadence with a smoke-tested guarantee, and Docker users get real `:canary`, `:nightly`, and stable image tags ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Subsystem affected Release automation: `scripts/release.sh`, `scripts/release-lib.sh`, `.github/workflows/release.yml`, `.github/workflows/docker.yml`, `.github/workflows/release-smoke.yml`. Problem or motivation The project publishes only `canary` (every master push) and `latest` (manual stable). Users who want prereleases without per-merge churn have no option. Docker has a second problem: master builds overwrite `:latest`, and CI-published stables never produced Docker images, because tags pushed with `GITHUB_TOKEN` do not fire the `v` tag trigger in `docker.yml`. No stable-versioned image exists in ghcr today. Proposed solution* Add a `nightly` channel. A scheduled job selects the newest canary-tagged master commit, smoke-tests that exact published canary, and republishes the same commit as `YYYY.MDD.P-nightly.N` under the `nightly` dist-tag. Separate Docker tags by lane (`:canary` for master, `:nightly` for nightly tags, `:latest` plus version tags for stable tags only), and have the release jobs dispatch `docker.yml` at the new tag so lane images actually build. Alternatives considered Moving the `nightly` dist-tag to the existing canary version without a republish. Rejected: the version string would say `canary` while the user is on nightly, which breaks at-a-glance lane identification in bug reports and `--version` output. ## What Changed - `scripts/release-lib.sh`: channel-parameterized `next_prerelease_version` and `prerelease_tag_name` helpers (canary helpers delegate to them), a `require_channel_tag_at_head` guard, and the no-provenance retry for Sigstore transparency-log duplicates now covers the `nightly` dist-tag as well as `canary` - `scripts/release.sh`: new `nightly` channel. It requires HEAD to carry a `canary/v` tag, publishes the full public package set as `YYYY.MDD.P-nightly.N` under dist-tag `nightly`, and tags the source commit `nightly/vYYYY.MDD.P-nightly.N` - `.github/workflows/release.yml`: scheduled nightly chain (09:00 UTC) — select candidate, smoke it via `release-smoke.yml`, publish on green under the existing `npm-canary` environment, push the tag, dispatch `docker.yml`. New `channel` dispatch input (default `stable`, so existing stable dispatches are unchanged) with `nightly_source_version` and `dry_run` support for forced runs. The stable path now also dispatches `docker.yml` at the new `v` tag - `.github/workflows/docker.yml`: lane tag mapping for both image jobs — master pushes publish `:canary` and no longer move `:latest`; `nightly/v` tags publish `:nightly`; only stable `v` tags publish `:latest` and the versioned tags. New `workflow_dispatch` trigger for the release-job dispatches. Build-version stamping uses the exact nightly version on nightly tag builds - `.github/workflows/release-smoke.yml`: `nightly` added to the dispatch choice list - `doc/CHANNELS.md` (new): user-facing guide to the channels - `doc/RELEASING.md`: nightly lane documentation, Docker tag mapping table, and a nightly failure playbook - `doc/RELEASE-AUTOMATION-SETUP.md`: note that nightly reuses `npm-canary` and needs no npm trusted-publisher changes - Tests: channel-parameterized version helper coverage in `scripts/release-registry-versions.test.mjs`, and nightly flow coverage (publish identity, notes not required, canary-tag guard) in `scripts/__tests__/release-dry-run-notes.test.mjs` ## Verification - `node --test` on the release script suites: 68 pass, including 6 new tests. The only failure, `acpx-patch-packaging.test.mjs`, needs installed `node_modules` and fails identically on a pristine checkout of master in the same environment - `bash -n` on both shell scripts and YAML parse of all three workflows - Live fail-path check: `./scripts/release.sh nightly --print-version` from a master tip with no canary tag fails with `HEAD has no canary/v* tag` - Live success-path check: the same command from the `canary/v2026.806.0-canary.7` commit prints `2026.806.0-nightly.0` - Live selection check: the candidate-selection shell logic run against the real repository selects the commit of `canary/v2026.806.0-canary.7`, which matches the current npm `canary` dist-tag exactly - After merge: dispatch `release.yml` with `channel: nightly` and `dry_run: true` to preview, then a real forced run to validate end to end before the first scheduled run ## Risks - Docker `:latest` changes meaning from "latest master build" to "latest stable release". This is deliberate and will be announced. Users who want the old behavior pull `:canary`. Until the first stable release after this change, `:latest` stays at its current (master-built) image - The nightly is a rebuild of the same source commit, not the byte-identical canary artifact that was smoked. The lockfile pins dependencies, and the publish path's registry-visibility and clean-prefix install gates still run on the nightly artifacts - All npm publishing must stay inside `release.yml` because npm trusted publishing pins that workflow file per package. The nightly jobs were added to `release.yml` for exactly that reason; this constraint is now documented in `RELEASING.md` - The stable-lane Docker dispatch fails gracefully (a warning with manual instructions) when the source ref predates `docker.yml`'s `workflow_dispatch` trigger ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Anthropic) in Claude Code, with extended thinking and full tool use (repository exploration, local test execution, live registry and git verification). All code, tests, and docs in this PR were model-authored under human direction. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending — will confirm before merge) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (pending — will confirm before merge) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-08-10 12:16:55 -07:00
Devin Foley	ea0dd3917e	build: make image layer caching actually hit (#10571 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Published container images are the deployable unit for self-hosted and managed instances, so merge-to-image latency bounds every deploy iteration > - The docker workflow configures BuildKit caching, but builds still ran ~12+ minutes essentially cold > - Two causes: the most expensive layer (four CLI toolchains + apt) is ordered after the always-changing app copy so it can never cache, and the type=gha cache's 10GB repo cap means the two multi-arch mode=max jobs evict each other > - This pull request reorders the tool layer above the app copy (with a weekly epoch so @latest tools keep advancing) and switches both jobs to registry-backed cache in ghcr > - The benefit is that warm builds shrink to roughly the app build + push, targeting the sub-5-minute range together with the amd64-only cloud variant ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No existing public issue — inline description following the feature request template: Subsystem affected CI / release publishing (docker workflow, Dockerfile) Problem or motivation Despite `cache-from/cache-to` being configured, image builds run effectively cold: (1) the production stage installs four CLI toolchains + apt packages after `COPY --from=build /app /app`, and since the app copy changes every commit, that most-expensive layer rebuilds every build, per arch; (2) the `type=gha` BuildKit cache is capped at 10GB per repository, and two multi-arch `mode=max` jobs overflow and evict each other's entries. Proposed solution Order the tool/OS layer before the app copy (it references nothing from `/app`), refresh it weekly via a `CLI_TOOLS_CACHE_EPOCH` build arg so the `@latest` tools don't freeze in the cache, and move both jobs to registry-backed BuildKit cache (`:buildcache` / `:buildcache-cloud` refs in ghcr, no size cap, separate refs so the parallel jobs don't clobber each other). Alternatives considered Pinning CLI tool versions instead of the weekly epoch — more deterministic, but adds a version-bump chore; the weekly epoch preserves current freshness semantics with bounded staleness. Keeping type=gha with `mode=min` — smaller cache but loses intermediate-stage reuse, which is where most of the win is. Roadmap alignment Not on ROADMAP.md; CI/publishing speed improvement only. ## What Changed - `Dockerfile`: the production stage's tool/OS `RUN` (npm --global CLIs, apt, `/paperclip` setup) moves above `COPY --from=build /app /app`; new `CLI_TOOLS_CACHE_EPOCH` arg consumed by that layer. The `cloud` stage is unaffected — it only layers plugin dists on top of the finished production stage. - `.github/workflows/docker.yml`: both jobs stamp the ISO week into `CLI_TOOLS_CACHE_EPOCH`, and both switch `cache-from/cache-to` from `type=gha` to `type=registry` with per-job refs. - Includes the one-line amd64-only cloud-variant commit from #10570 so the two PRs can't conflict; if #10570 merges first, this PR rebases down to a single commit automatically. ## Verification - Image content is unchanged by layer reordering: the moved `RUN` references nothing from `/app`, and Docker layer ordering only affects caching, not the final filesystem (tool installs and app copy touch disjoint paths). - The cache ref is written only by this workflow — `docker.yml` runs on master/tag pushes, never on PRs — so the workflow's existing "no shared caches into build inputs" supply-chain stance is unchanged (BuildKit layer cache was already accepted via type=gha; the registry backend has the same writer trust). - Runtime proof lands with the first two master builds after merge: the first warms the cache, the second should show the tool layer and deps/build stages as CACHED in the build log, with wall clock dropping accordingly. I'll be watching those as part of managed-deploy work. ## Risks - Low. Worst case the registry cache misses (cold-build behavior, same as today). The weekly epoch means CLI tools update at most a week late inside images; a release built mid-week ships the tools from that week's first build. Cache refs add two small artifacts to ghcr. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, extended thinking, via Claude Code with tool use and code execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (no test-affecting changes) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (n/a — build config and layer ordering only) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (in-file comments document both mechanisms) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-07-31 14:47:25 -07:00
Devin Foley	ce40343b9c	build: publish the cloud image variant for amd64 only (#10570 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Published container images are how both self-hosted users and managed-deployment hosts run it > - The repository publishes two variants: the self-hosted image and a cloud variant for managed deployments > - The cloud variant was built for amd64+arm64, but its only consumers are managed-deployment hosts, which run amd64 > - The QEMU-emulated arm64 half dominates the build's wall clock, delaying every merge-to-deployable-image cycle > - This pull request drops arm64 from the cloud variant only, keeping the self-hosted image multi-arch > - The benefit is roughly halving the time from merge to a deployable cloud image, with no change for any actual consumer ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No existing public issue — inline description following the feature request template: Subsystem affected CI / release publishing (docker workflow) Problem or motivation The cloud image variant builds for `linux/amd64,linux/arm64`, but the arm64 half runs under QEMU emulation and dominates the job's wall clock — while no consumer of the cloud variant runs arm64 (managed-deployment hosts are amd64). Every deploy iteration pays ~double the necessary build time. Proposed solution Build the cloud variant amd64-only. The self-hosted image keeps `amd64+arm64` so ARM users (Apple Silicon, ARM servers) are unaffected. Alternatives considered Keeping multi-arch but building arm64 on native arm64 runners with a manifest merge — faster than QEMU and worth doing for the self-hosted image if its build time becomes a pain point, but unnecessary complexity for a variant with no arm64 consumers. Roadmap alignment Not on ROADMAP.md; CI/publishing speed improvement only. ## What Changed - `.github/workflows/docker.yml`: the `build-and-push-cloud` job's `platforms` is now `linux/amd64` (with a comment explaining why). The self-hosted `build-and-push` job is untouched. ## Verification - Build-config-only change; the workflow runs on merge to master. The published `-cloud` manifest will be amd64-only, which its consumers already pull. - No test changes: nothing at runtime differs on any platform that actually runs the image. ## Risks - Low. If an arm64 consumer of the cloud variant ever appears (e.g. local `docker run` on Apple Silicon for debugging), it would fall back to emulation on the consumer's machine or need this reverted — a one-line change. The self-hosted image's platform matrix is unchanged. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, extended thinking, via Claude Code with tool use and code execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (no test-affecting changes) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (n/a — CI platform matrix only) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (in-workflow comment documents the rationale) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-07-31 13:41:44 -07:00
Devin Foley	521271ebb7	build: bake the build commit into published images (#10566 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Instances commonly run from published container images, and operators need to observe which build a container actually serves > - `/api/health` now reports the running build commit, and server-info already falls back to `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_COMMIT` when git is unavailable > - But published images carry no `.git` and never received `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_COMMIT`, so containers report `commit: null` — verified live against a current image > - That leaves the new deployment-verification field inert exactly where it matters most: containerized deploys > - This pull request bakes the exact build commit into both image variants at build time, mirroring how `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_VERSION` is already stamped > - The benefit is that containers report their true commit on `/api/health`, so deploy tooling can verify a rollout actually shipped ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Companion to #10563 (which exposed the `commit` field on `/api/health`). Inline description following the bug report template: What happened? A container from a published image responds to `GET /api/health` with `"commit": null`. The image has no `.git` directory and the `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_COMMIT` fallback that `server-info` supports is never provided at build time, so git metadata resolves as unavailable. Expected behavior A container reports the commit it was built from, the same way it already reports its build version via the baked `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_VERSION`. Steps to reproduce Run any published image (e.g. `ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip:sha-c4f6264-cloud`) and `curl /api/health` — `commit` is `null` even though the build commit is known at image-build time. Paperclip version or commit `sha-c4f6264-cloud` (first image containing #10563). ## What Changed - `Dockerfile`: new `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_COMMIT` build arg, exported as an ENV in the production stage (the `cloud` stage inherits it), directly parallel to `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_VERSION`. Empty for local `docker build`, which keeps the normal fallbacks. - `.github/workflows/docker.yml`: both build jobs pass `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_COMMIT=${{ github.sha }}`. ## Verification - Reviewed the plumbing end-to-end: `build-commit.ts` reads `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_COMMIT` (validated as a full SHA), `server-info.ts` `readGitInfo` falls back to it when the git CLI fails, producing `available: true, fullSha` — which `/api/health` surfaces as `commit`. - Verified live that a current published image reports `commit: null`; this change repairs that on the next build. Post-merge, the first master image should report its commit — I'll be verifying that as part of managed-deploy validation. - No test changes: the fallback path is already covered by existing server-info tests; this PR only supplies the env at image build. ## Risks - Low. Two build-time stamps; no runtime code changes. A wrong SHA would only mislabel the build (same failure mode `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_VERSION` already carries), and `${{ github.sha }}` is the exact commit the workflow builds. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, extended thinking, via Claude Code with tool use and code execution); diagnosis included live probes of a running container's `/api/health`. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (no test-affecting changes; server suites unaffected) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (n/a — build-time stamps only) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (Dockerfile comments document the arg) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-07-31 13:01:52 -07:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip	ca92f727c5	ci: publish the cloud image in its own parallel job (#10408 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The CI workflow is responsible for producing and publishing the Docker images that power Paperclip deployments > - The cloud image publish was previously coupled to the stock publish job, so a failure or delay in one path could gate the other > - That coupling makes the release pipeline less resilient than it needs to be > - This pull request gives the cloud publish its own top-level job so both publishes can run in parallel without a `needs:` dependency > - The benefit is better failure isolation and less wasted time when one publish path is slow or broken ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue was found for this change. Problem statement: - The cloud image publish was implemented as trailing work inside the stock publish job. - That setup meant the cloud publish could be delayed or skipped if the stock job failed early. - The desired behavior is for the cloud publish to run independently so a failure in one publish path does not gate the other. Proposed solution: - Split the cloud publish into its own top-level workflow job. - Keep the same cloud-specific build settings and cache behavior. - Preserve the existing top-level concurrency behavior. Alternatives considered: - Keeping both publishes in one job with conditionals or later steps. Rejected because it still couples success and runtime between the two publish paths. ## What Changed - Split the cloud image publish into a separate top-level Docker workflow job. - Removed the dependency coupling so the cloud job does not need the stock job. - Expanded the drift-guard test to assert the two-job structure and the absence of `needs:` on the cloud job. ## Verification - The workflow YAML was parsed successfully and confirmed to contain two jobs: `build-and-push` and `build-and-push-cloud`. - The cloud job was confirmed to have no `needs:` entry. - The drift-guard assertions were reproduced in a dependency-free harness and passed. - PR #10408 completed GitHub Actions with all required checks green, including the e2e shards. - Greptile review completed at 5/5 with no unresolved comments. - No documentation files changed because this is a workflow/test-only change. ## Risks - The workflow now duplicates the prep steps across two runners, so any shared setup change must be kept in sync between both jobs. - The new job increases workflow surface area slightly, which can make future maintenance more verbose. - Overall risk is low because the change is limited to CI orchestration and test coverage. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-5, tool-using code assistant) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-07-28 15:38:01 -07:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip	db02ca7402	ci: keep in-flight docker builds from being cancelled (#10403 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The repository uses GitHub Actions workflows to build and publish Docker images > - A workflow-level concurrency policy controls whether newer pushes cancel in-flight builds > - The current job-level setting can cancel a running image build before it finishes publishing > - That leaves the Docker image pipeline brittle when a new push arrives during an active publish > - This pull request moves concurrency to the workflow level and disables cancel-in-progress so running builds finish > - The benefit is that only pending work is superseded, while a build already publishing is allowed to complete ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this change. This PR addresses the Docker workflow concurrency behavior directly: it ensures in-flight image builds are not cancelled by newer pushes, while still serializing builds per ref. ## What Changed - Moved the Docker workflow concurrency block from the job level to the workflow level. - Set `cancel-in-progress: false` so an active build can finish publishing. - Added a drift-guard test that parses `.github/workflows/docker.yml` and asserts the workflow-level concurrency policy remains `false`. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/cloud-image-bundled-plugins.test.ts` - `python3 -c "import yaml; yaml.safe_load(open('.github/workflows/docker.yml'))"` - Verified the fetched remote branch contains a single commit on top of `origin/master`. - Searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and issues; none found. - Checked `ROADMAP.md` and did not find overlapping planned core work. ## Risks - Low risk: the change is limited to workflow concurrency behavior and a targeted test assertion. - If the workflow concurrency key is changed later, the drift-guard test will fail and require an update. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-5, tool use; context window not surfaced in this environment) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-07-28 15:08:17 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	d1b9448b57	fix(server): stamp the real build version into images instead of the package.json placeholder (#10257 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work; it ships as a Docker image that self-hosters and managed deployments run. > - The server resolves its own version at runtime in `server/src/version.ts` (`resolveServerVersion()`), which feeds analytics and the server debug panel. > - That resolver derives the real version from `git describe`, and falls back to `server/package.json`'s `version` when git isn't available. > - But `server/package.json`'s version is a static placeholder — CI only stamps the real CalVer at publish, so in source it is never the real version (currently `0.3.1`). > - A Docker image has no `.git` (it's dockerignored), so `git describe` can't run inside it. Every image therefore falls back to the placeholder and reports `0.3.1` in analytics and the debug panel, regardless of which commit it was built from. > - This PR computes the real version once on the CI build runner (where `.git` and tags exist), bakes it into the image, and has `resolveServerVersion()` prefer that stamp when `git describe` is unavailable. > - The benefit: self-hosted and cloud images report their true version instead of a misleading placeholder, with no change to dev checkouts, `git describe`-based resolution, or local `docker build`. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists — describing the bug inline (per the bug report template). What happened? Docker images built from `master` (and release tags) report the server version as the `0.3.1` placeholder in analytics and the server debug panel, instead of the real version of the commit the image was built from. Expected behavior An image reports the real version of its build commit (e.g. `2026.722.0+51.git.<sha>`), so operators can tell which build is running. Steps to reproduce 1. Build the server Docker image from any `master` commit (the `Docker` workflow, `production` target). 2. Run the image and open the server debug panel (or inspect the version reported to analytics). 3. Observe the version is `0.3.1` rather than the commit's real version. Root cause `resolveServerVersion()` derives the real version from `git describe`, but the image has no `.git` (dockerignored), so it falls back to `server/package.json`'s `version` — a static placeholder CI only replaces with the real CalVer at publish time. Nothing bakes the real version into the image. Paperclip version or commit: reproduces on `master` (`4c55f0d8`) and any published image. Deployment mode: self-hosted and managed (both the `production` and `-cloud` images). Installation method: Docker image (`ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip`). Related PRs (dedup search): #9103 (merged — added the `git describe`-based source-install resolution this builds on) and #9637 (closed). Neither bakes a version into the image; this PR closes that gap. No duplicate found. ## What Changed - `.github/workflows/docker.yml` — checkout with full history + tags (`fetch-depth: 0`), and a new `Compute build version` step that runs `git describe --tags --match 'v' --long --dirty` on the pristine runner checkout. The result is passed as a `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_VERSION` build-arg to both the `production` and `-cloud` image builds. - `Dockerfile`* — the `production` stage takes an `ARG PAPERCLIP_BUILD_VERSION` (default empty) and bakes it into the runtime `ENV`; the `cloud` stage inherits it via `FROM production`. - `server/src/build-version.ts` (new) — `readBuildVersion()` / `parseBuildVersion()`, mirroring `build-commit.ts`: reads `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_VERSION` (or a `.paperclip-build-version` file) as a single-token stamp. - `server/src/version.ts` — `resolveServerVersion()` prefers the baked build version when `git describe` is unavailable, parsing it with the same rules as a live checkout (`parseGitDescribeVersion`), and falling through to the existing `build-commit` stamp and package version when unset. A live checkout's `git describe` still wins over any stamp. - Tests for the new behavior and the precedence. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk ensure-build-deps && tsc --noEmit` in `server/` — clean. - `vitest run server/src/__tests__/version.test.ts server/src/__tests__/build-version.test.ts` — 23 tests pass, covering: stamped version used when git describe fails, stamp parsed to real CalVer, stamp preferred over the build-commit fallback, on-tag stamp collapses to the release version, a pre-resolved stamp used verbatim, and a live git describe still winning over a stamp. - `git describe --tags --match 'v*' --long` for this commit → `v2026.722.0-51-g<sha>`, which `resolveServerVersion()` reports as `2026.722.0+51.git.<sha>` — no longer `0.3.1`. - Not run locally: the full multi-arch image build (CI-only). The workflow change is verified by inspection; the version is computed on the pristine checkout before any lockfile refresh, so it carries no spurious `-dirty`. ## Risks Low. Additive and image-only: - No runtime behavior changes for dev checkouts (git describe still primary and wins over any stamp) or for local `docker build` (empty arg → server keeps its existing fallbacks). - Not a breaking change; no schema or API surface. The stamp is informational (version reporting only). - `fetch-depth: 0` makes the release-image checkout fetch full history/tags — a modest cost on a workflow that already runs at release cadence with a 60-minute budget. - Rollback: revert the commit; images simply return to reporting the placeholder. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`, 1M-context variant), extended thinking, with tool use / code execution — agentic edits, `tsc` + `vitest` runs, and a `git describe` resolution check. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work (bugfix, not core feature work) - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above (#9103, #9637 — related, not duplicates) - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (`fix/build-version-stamp`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no user-facing docs affected; behavior is documented inline in `version.ts` / `build-version.ts` and the workflow/Dockerfile) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-07-25 10:06:28 -07:00
Devin Foley	965a827ee7	feat(docker): publish a cloud image variant with built bundled plugins (#10157 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Managed (cloud-hosted) deployments configure instances through `PAPERCLIP_MANAGED_CONFIG`, including a `plugins.autoInstall` key list that the boot-time installer resolves against the bundled plugin catalog > - The installer requires each bundled plugin's `dist/manifest.js` (`server/src/services/bundled-plugins.ts`), but the published image only ships the sandbox providers' source — they are intentionally excluded from the pnpm workspace, and the Dockerfile never builds them > - Every managed auto-install therefore logs `bundled plugin bundle not present; skipping auto-install` and no sandbox provider can be provisioned through managed config > - Baking built plugins into the single published image would fix it but makes every self-hosted pull carry the providers' `node_modules` for a managed-only mechanism > - This pull request adds a `cloud` Dockerfile target extending `production` with built bundled plugins — parameterized by build arg and currently just `daytona` — published alongside the default image with a `-cloud` tag suffix > - The benefit is working plugin auto-provisioning for managed deployments while the self-hosted image stays byte-identical and the cloud variant only carries what is actually deployed ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #10158 (filed for this problem; no prior issue existed — searched for duplicate/related PRs and issues around bundled plugins, docker image variants, and auto-install). Summary: What happened: on a managed instance with `plugins.autoInstall: ["daytona"]` delivered via `PAPERCLIP_MANAGED_CONFIG`, boot logs `bundled plugin bundle not present; skipping auto-install` with `pluginPath: /app/packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona`, and the plugin is never installed. Expected: the advertised bundled-catalog keys are installable from the published image. Why: the image ships plugin source without `dist/` — nothing in the Dockerfile builds the workspace-excluded sandbox providers. ## What Changed - `Dockerfile`: new `cloud-plugins` stage (based on `build`, so devDependencies are available for `tsc`) that installs and builds each provider named in the `CLOUD_BUNDLED_PLUGINS` build arg standalone (`pnpm install --ignore-workspace --no-lockfile && pnpm build`, exactly as the providers' READMEs prescribe), asserting `dist/manifest.js` exists per plugin and failing loudly on unknown names; new `cloud` stage = `production` + the built plugin tree. The arg defaults to `daytona` — the only provider managed deployments auto-install today; every entry adds its `node_modules` to the image, so the list grows only with actual need (a one-line workflow change). - `.github/workflows/docker.yml`: the existing build step is pinned to `target: production` (without this, the new trailing stage would silently become the default build target — this pin is what keeps the self-hosted image identical); new metadata + build-push steps publish the `cloud` target (with `CLOUD_BUNDLED_PLUGINS=daytona`) under the same tag set with a `-cloud` suffix (`sha-<short>-cloud`, `latest-cloud`, `<version>-cloud`), same schema labels, reusing the GHA layer cache ## Verification - All seven sandbox providers build standalone from a clean checkout with the exact commands the new stage runs, each producing `dist/manifest.js` — so the current `daytona` default works and future list additions are known-good - The stage's shell loop was dry-run against the checkout (directory existence + per-plugin assertion logic) - Workflow YAML lints clean - Not run: a full multi-arch `docker build` (no local docker daemon). The `cloud` stage is additive and the default target is pinned, so the risk is contained to the new build step; the first master build after merge proves it end-to-end ## Risks - Self-hosted behavior: unchanged. The default image build is pinned to the `production` target, which produces the same layers as before this change; the `cloud` stages run only for the new build step. - The plugin installs in the `cloud-plugins` stage use `--no-lockfile` (the providers are workspace-excluded and lockfile-less by design), so plugin dependency resolution is not pinned at image-build time. This mirrors the existing Plugins-page install path, which resolves from npm at install time. - CI cost: one additional build-push per master push. It reuses the layer cache from the production build, so the marginal work is the single plugin's build layers. - An unknown name in `CLOUD_BUNDLED_PLUGINS`, or a provider that stops producing `dist/manifest.js`, fails the cloud build loudly rather than publishing a broken variant. ## Model Used Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-fable-5[1m]` via Claude Code CLI — extended thinking and tool use (code edits, standalone plugin build verification, workflow lint). ## Checklist - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] Self-hosted behavior unchanged (default build target pinned to `production`) - [x] One clear change: publish a cloud image variant with built bundled plugins	2026-07-24 08:22:34 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	14f20be92b	ci: harden Docker image build workflow against lockfile drift and runner disk exhaustion (#10142 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Docker image publish workflow (`.github/workflows/docker.yml`) builds and pushes the multi-arch `ghcr.io` image on every master push, so users pulling the container get the latest code > - The two newest master runs of that workflow failed, so no images have been published past a recent master commit > - The failures had two distinct causes: run [30054330748](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/30054330748) hit `ERR_PNPM_LOCKFILE_CONFIG_MISMATCH` (committed `pnpm-lock.yaml` drifted from `patchedDependencies` in package metadata), and run [30050197392](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/30050197392) hit `no space left on device` during the multi-arch buildx export > - This pull request hardens the publish job against both failure modes: it refreshes the lockfile (lockfile-only, guarded) before the build, and frees runner disk space before buildx setup > - The benefit is that image publishing keeps working through routine lockfile drift and the growing multi-arch build footprint, so `ghcr.io` images stay current with master ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Refs #8286 — same class of Docker-build lockfile mismatch failure - Refs #8827 — pnpm 9.15.x pin / lockfile regeneration discussion - Note: the immediate lockfile drift on master was fixed by #10132; the refresh step here prevents the next drift from breaking image publishing again ## What Changed - Added a pnpm + Node setup and a "Refresh lockfile for Docker build context" step to the image job in `.github/workflows/docker.yml`: runs `pnpm install --lockfile-only --ignore-scripts --no-frozen-lockfile`, exits cleanly if nothing changed, and fails the job if anything other than `pnpm-lock.yaml` was modified by the refresh - Added a "Free runner disk" step (before buildx setup) that prunes the pnpm store, apt caches, preinstalled toolchains (`/usr/share/dotnet`, Android SDK, Swift, Boost, PowerShell, GHC, CodeQL/PyPy/Ruby toolcache), and dangling Docker state, logging `df -h` before/after - No changes outside the workflow file (54 added lines, nothing removed) ## Verification - Pulled the logs of both failed master runs and matched each failure to the step that addresses it: [30054330748](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/30054330748) failed with `ERR_PNPM_LOCKFILE_CONFIG_MISMATCH`, [30050197392](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/30050197392) failed with `no space left on device` during the buildx export - Confirmed pnpm `9.15.4` in the new setup step matches the repo `packageManager` field and the version used in the Dockerfile, so the refreshed lockfile is generated by the same pnpm the image build consumes - Validated the workflow YAML parses cleanly - The workflow triggers on master pushes / manual dispatch; the definitive check is the first master run after merge — reviewers can also `workflow_dispatch` it from this branch if desired ## Risks - The lockfile refresh runs with `--ignore-scripts` and a guard that aborts on any non-lockfile change, so it cannot silently pull unexpected code into the image; worst case it fails the job with a clear diff - The published image could be built from a refreshed lockfile that differs from the committed one when drift exists — that keeps publishing alive but can mask drift on master, which still needs the committed lockfile fixed (as #10132 did) - Disk cleanup removes preinstalled toolchains only on the ephemeral runner for this job; other jobs/workflows are unaffected - Low risk overall: additive steps in a single workflow file ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic) — `claude-fable-5` (Claude Code agent harness, extended thinking, tool use). Used to diagnose the failing CI runs from logs, author the workflow changes, and prepare this PR. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (no runtime code touched; workflow YAML validated — see Verification) - [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable (n/a — CI workflow change) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (none needed) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending — will confirm once checks run) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (pending review pass) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-07-23 21:19:30 -07:00
Devin Foley	fa4f900d1a	ci: label Docker images with their bundled schema migration set (#9908 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip publishes Docker images from this repo that self-hosters and orchestration tooling deploy; the server refuses to start when its database is missing any schema migration the build bundles (`ensureMigrations`) > - Anything that deploys these images therefore needs to know an image's schema expectations before deploying it — today that requires pulling the image or checking out the matching commit, both heavyweight for tooling that just wants to answer "will this image boot against a database migrated to N?" > - Getting this wrong is expensive: an image ahead of the applied schema crash-loops at startup and fails healthchecks after deployment resources are already created > - This pull request labels every published image with its bundled migration set (last migration file and count), computed at build time from `packages/db/src/migrations` in the same tree the image is built from > - The benefit is image/schema compatibility verification with two cheap registry requests (manifest + config blob), no pull, and no drift risk between label and image contents ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No existing public issue; inline description per the feature request template: - Subsystem affected: Docker image publishing (`.github/workflows/docker.yml`), `packages/db` migrations - Problem or motivation: deployment tooling cannot cheaply determine which schema migrations a published image expects; the only options are pulling the image or checking out the matching commit. Deploying an image whose bundled migrations exceed the applied schema makes the server refuse to start, so this check is needed before resources are created. - Proposed solution: OCI labels (`io.github.paperclipai.schema.last-migration`, `io.github.paperclipai.schema.migration-count`), computed from the migrations directory at build time via the existing `docker/metadata-action` step. Keys use org-based reverse-DNS (the GitHub org) so the label contract survives product-domain migrations. - Alternatives considered: a schema manifest published beside the image (second artifact to keep in sync — rejected); encoding schema info in tags (tags already carry semver/sha meaning — rejected). - Roadmap alignment: checked `ROADMAP.md` — no overlap with planned core work; this is build metadata only. ## What Changed - `.github/workflows/docker.yml`: a `Compute schema migration labels` step (`ls` + `sort` over `packages/db/src/migrations/.sql`) feeding two custom labels into the existing `docker/metadata-action` step. ## Verification - Workflow YAML validated locally. - The label-computation commands run against the current tree produce `last=0181_decision_training_retention_policy.sql`, `count=180`. - After merge, verify with: fetch the image config blob for a fresh `sha-` tag from ghcr and confirm both `io.github.paperclipai.schema.*` labels are present. ## Risks - Low. Labels are metadata only; no change to image contents. If the migrations directory ever moves, the label step fails the workflow loudly (`ls` exits non-zero) rather than publishing wrong labels. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic) — model id `claude-fable-5`, via the Claude Code CLI harness with tool use (shell, file edits). Change authored and verified agent-assisted, human-directed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (YAML validation; label commands — no app code changed) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (n/a — CI metadata only) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (n/a — workflow comment documents the labels) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-07-20 15:54:31 -04:00
dependabot[bot]	b18cbb0dd3	build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 6 to 7 (#8461 ) Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 6 to 7. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases">actions/checkout's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v7.0.0</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>block checking out fork pr for pull_request_target and workflow_run by <a href="https://github.com/aiqiaoy"><code>@aiqiaoy</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2454">actions/checkout#2454</a></li> <li>Bump actions/publish-immutable-action from 0.0.3 to 0.0.4 in the minor-actions-dependencies group across 1 directory by <a href="https://github.com/dependabot"><code>@dependabot</code></a>[bot] in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2458">actions/checkout#2458</a></li> <li>Bump flatted from 3.3.1 to 3.4.2 by <a href="https://github.com/dependabot"><code>@dependabot</code></a>[bot] in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2460">actions/checkout#2460</a></li> <li>Bump js-yaml from 4.1.0 to 4.2.0 by <a href="https://github.com/dependabot"><code>@dependabot</code></a>[bot] in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2461">actions/checkout#2461</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@actions/core</code> and <code>@actions/tool-cache</code> and Remove uuid by <a href="https://github.com/dependabot"><code>@dependabot</code></a>[bot] in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2459">actions/checkout#2459</a></li> <li>upgrade module to esm and update dependencies by <a href="https://github.com/aiqiaoy"><code>@aiqiaoy</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2463">actions/checkout#2463</a></li> <li>Bump the minor-npm-dependencies group across 1 directory with 3 updates by <a href="https://github.com/dependabot"><code>@dependabot</code></a>[bot] in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2462">actions/checkout#2462</a></li> <li>getting ready for checkout v7 release by <a href="https://github.com/aiqiaoy"><code>@aiqiaoy</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2464">actions/checkout#2464</a></li> <li>update error wording by <a href="https://github.com/aiqiaoy"><code>@aiqiaoy</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2467">actions/checkout#2467</a></li> </ul> <h2>New Contributors</h2> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/aiqiaoy"><code>@aiqiaoy</code></a> made their first contribution in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2454">actions/checkout#2454</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v6.0.3...v7.0.0">https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v6.0.3...v7.0.0</a></p> <h2>v6.0.3</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>Update changelog by <a href="https://github.com/ericsciple"><code>@ericsciple</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2357">actions/checkout#2357</a></li> <li>fix: expand merge commit SHA regex and add SHA-256 test cases by <a href="https://github.com/yaananth"><code>@yaananth</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2414">actions/checkout#2414</a></li> <li>Fix checkout init for SHA-256 repositories by <a href="https://github.com/yaananth"><code>@yaananth</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2439">actions/checkout#2439</a></li> <li>Update changelog for v6.0.3 by <a href="https://github.com/yaananth"><code>@yaananth</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2446">actions/checkout#2446</a></li> </ul> <h2>New Contributors</h2> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/yaananth"><code>@yaananth</code></a> made their first contribution in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2414">actions/checkout#2414</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v6...v6.0.3">https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v6...v6.0.3</a></p> <h2>v6.0.2</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>Add orchestration_id to git user-agent when ACTIONS_ORCHESTRATION_ID is set by <a href="https://github.com/TingluoHuang"><code>@TingluoHuang</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2355">actions/checkout#2355</a></li> <li>Fix tag handling: preserve annotations and explicit fetch-tags by <a href="https://github.com/ericsciple"><code>@ericsciple</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2356">actions/checkout#2356</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v6.0.1...v6.0.2">https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v6.0.1...v6.0.2</a></p> <h2>v6.0.1</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>Update all references from v5 and v4 to v6 by <a href="https://github.com/ericsciple"><code>@ericsciple</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2314">actions/checkout#2314</a></li> <li>Add worktree support for persist-credentials includeIf by <a href="https://github.com/ericsciple"><code>@ericsciple</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2327">actions/checkout#2327</a></li> <li>Clarify v6 README by <a href="https://github.com/ericsciple"><code>@ericsciple</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2328">actions/checkout#2328</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v6...v6.0.1">https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v6...v6.0.1</a></p> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0"><code>9c091bb</code></a> update error wording (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2467">#2467</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/1044a6dea927916f2c38ba5aeffbc0a847b1221a"><code>1044a6d</code></a> getting ready for checkout v7 release (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2464">#2464</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/f0282184c7ce73ab54c7e4ab5a617122602e575f"><code>f028218</code></a> Bump the minor-npm-dependencies group across 1 directory with 3 updates (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2462">#2462</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/d914b262ffc244530a203ab40decab34c3abf34d"><code>d914b26</code></a> upgrade module to esm and update dependencies (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2463">#2463</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/537c7ef99cef6e5ddb5e7ff5d16d14510503801d"><code>537c7ef</code></a> Bump <code>@actions/core</code> and <code>@actions/tool-cache</code> and Remove uuid (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2459">#2459</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/130a169078a413d3a5246a393625e8e742f387f6"><code>130a169</code></a> Bump js-yaml from 4.1.0 to 4.2.0 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2461">#2461</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/7d09575332117a40b46e5e020664df234cd416f3"><code>7d09575</code></a> Bump flatted from 3.3.1 to 3.4.2 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2460">#2460</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/0f9f3aa320cb53abeb534aeb54048075d9697a0e"><code>0f9f3aa</code></a> Bump actions/publish-immutable-action (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2458">#2458</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/f9e715a95fcd1f9253f77dd28f11e88d2d6460c7"><code>f9e715a</code></a> block checking out fork pr for pull_request_target and workflow_run (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2454">#2454</a>)</li> <li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v6...v7">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=actions/checkout&package-manager=github_actions&previous-version=6&new-version=7)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-06-23 10:13:39 -07:00
dependabot[bot]	707dd98fe1	build(deps): bump docker/build-push-action from 6 to 7 (#7563 ) Bumps [docker/build-push-action](https://github.com/docker/build-push-action) from 6 to 7. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/releases">docker/build-push-action's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v7.0.0</h2> <ul> <li>Node 24 as default runtime (requires <a href="https://github.com/actions/runner/releases/tag/v2.327.1">Actions Runner v2.327.1</a> or later) by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1470">docker/build-push-action#1470</a></li> <li>Remove deprecated <code>DOCKER_BUILD_NO_SUMMARY</code> and <code>DOCKER_BUILD_EXPORT_RETENTION_DAYS</code> envs by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1473">docker/build-push-action#1473</a></li> <li>Remove legacy export-build tool support for build summary by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1474">docker/build-push-action#1474</a></li> <li>Switch to ESM and update config/test wiring by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1466">docker/build-push-action#1466</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@actions/core</code> from 1.11.1 to 3.0.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1454">docker/build-push-action#1454</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.62.1 to 0.79.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1453">docker/build-push-action#1453</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1472">docker/build-push-action#1472</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1479">docker/build-push-action#1479</a></li> <li>Bump minimatch from 3.1.2 to 3.1.5 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1463">docker/build-push-action#1463</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6.19.2...v7.0.0">https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6.19.2...v7.0.0</a></p> <h2>v6.19.2</h2> <ul> <li>Preserve port in <code>GIT_AUTH_TOKEN</code> host by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1458">docker/build-push-action#1458</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6.19.1...v6.19.2">https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6.19.1...v6.19.2</a></p> <h2>v6.19.1</h2> <ul> <li>Derive <code>GIT_AUTH_TOKEN</code> host from GitHub server URL by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1456">docker/build-push-action#1456</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6.19.0...v6.19.1">https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6.19.0...v6.19.1</a></p> <h2>v6.19.0</h2> <ul> <li>Scope default git auth token to <code>github.com</code> by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1451">docker/build-push-action#1451</a></li> <li>Bump brace-expansion from 1.1.11 to 1.1.12 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1396">docker/build-push-action#1396</a></li> <li>Bump form-data from 2.5.1 to 2.5.5 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1391">docker/build-push-action#1391</a></li> <li>Bump js-yaml from 3.14.1 to 3.14.2 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1429">docker/build-push-action#1429</a></li> <li>Bump lodash from 4.17.21 to 4.17.23 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1446">docker/build-push-action#1446</a></li> <li>Bump tmp from 0.2.3 to 0.2.4 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1398">docker/build-push-action#1398</a></li> <li>Bump undici from 5.28.4 to 5.29.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1397">docker/build-push-action#1397</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6.18.0...v6.19.0">https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6.18.0...v6.19.0</a></p> <h2>v6.18.0</h2> <ul> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.61.0 to 0.62.1 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1381">docker/build-push-action#1381</a></li> </ul> <blockquote> <p>[!NOTE] <a href="https://docs.docker.com/build/ci/github-actions/build-summary/">Build summary</a> is now supported with <a href="https://docs.docker.com/build-cloud/">Docker Build Cloud</a>.</p> </blockquote> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6.17.0...v6.18.0">https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6.17.0...v6.18.0</a></p> <h2>v6.17.0</h2> <ul> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.59.0 to 0.61.0 by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1364">docker/build-push-action#1364</a></li> </ul> <blockquote> <p>[!NOTE] Build record is now exported using the <a href="https://docs.docker.com/reference/cli/docker/buildx/history/export/"><code>buildx history export</code></a> command instead of the legacy export-build tool.</p> </blockquote> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6.16.0...v6.17.0">https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6.16.0...v6.17.0</a></p> <h2>v6.16.0</h2> <ul> <li>Handle no default attestations env var by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/pull/1343">docker/build-push-action#1343</a></li> </ul> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/commit/f9f3042f7e2789586610d6e8b85c8f03e5195baf"><code>f9f3042</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/issues/1517">#1517</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/docker/actions-t...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/commit/812d5fd9212a4c5d419e5be02fd8e9bb435c5d76"><code>812d5fd</code></a> chore: update generated content</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/commit/b6f66930769f2917a3275dc4d81f15583ac7e105"><code>b6f6693</code></a> chore(deps): Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.87.0 to 0.90.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/commit/c1c626eced73a500ec65c4256c620b3b9e8278c0"><code>c1c626e</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/issues/1525">#1525</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/actions/core-3.0.1</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/commit/51bb284cd4d05650aa6f5e4e22cb96d2cbfe62b7"><code>51bb284</code></a> chore: update generated content</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/commit/5f7884def8f133e8ef40c53d003d1471c05621c6"><code>5f7884d</code></a> chore(deps): Bump <code>@actions/core</code> from 3.0.0 to 3.0.1</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/commit/e01deff7d956c756a20f3e19ff7ddc0e4a50fc1d"><code>e01deff</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/issues/1521">#1521</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/fast-xml-parser-...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/commit/3804d497934b39bd591ee9d1c6c9e593b4488a67"><code>3804d49</code></a> chore: update generated content</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/commit/71e8947aac5dad23ce83a43e9c98f750e02de2f3"><code>71e8947</code></a> chore(deps): Bump fast-xml-parser from 5.5.7 to 5.8.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/commit/4925ad24cdbc42ff492d76cf9fe7a30b79976b60"><code>4925ad2</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/build-push-action/issues/1526">#1526</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/postcss-8.5.10</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v6...v7">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=docker/build-push-action&package-manager=github_actions&previous-version=6&new-version=7)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-06-04 22:21:31 -07:00
dependabot[bot]	9dda42299e	build(deps): bump docker/login-action from 3 to 4 (#7562 ) Bumps [docker/login-action](https://github.com/docker/login-action) from 3 to 4. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/releases">docker/login-action's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v4.0.0</h2> <ul> <li>Node 24 as default runtime (requires <a href="https://github.com/actions/runner/releases/tag/v2.327.1">Actions Runner v2.327.1</a> or later) by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/929">docker/login-action#929</a></li> <li>Switch to ESM and update config/test wiring by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/927">docker/login-action#927</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@actions/core</code> from 1.11.1 to 3.0.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/919">docker/login-action#919</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@aws-sdk/client-ecr</code> from 3.890.0 to 3.1000.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/909">docker/login-action#909</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/920">docker/login-action#920</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@aws-sdk/client-ecr-public</code> from 3.890.0 to 3.1000.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/909">docker/login-action#909</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/920">docker/login-action#920</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.63.0 to 0.77.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/910">docker/login-action#910</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/928">docker/login-action#928</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@isaacs/brace-expansion</code> from 5.0.0 to 5.0.1 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/921">docker/login-action#921</a></li> <li>Bump js-yaml from 4.1.0 to 4.1.1 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/901">docker/login-action#901</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/compare/v3.7.0...v4.0.0">https://github.com/docker/login-action/compare/v3.7.0...v4.0.0</a></p> <h2>v3.7.0</h2> <ul> <li>Add <code>scope</code> input to set scopes for the authentication token by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/912">docker/login-action#912</a></li> <li>Add support for AWS European Sovereign Cloud ECR by <a href="https://github.com/dphi"><code>@dphi</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/914">docker/login-action#914</a></li> <li>Ensure passwords are redacted with <code>registry-auth</code> input by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/911">docker/login-action#911</a></li> <li>build(deps): bump lodash from 4.17.21 to 4.17.23 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/915">docker/login-action#915</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/compare/v3.6.0...v3.7.0">https://github.com/docker/login-action/compare/v3.6.0...v3.7.0</a></p> <h2>v3.6.0</h2> <ul> <li>Add <code>registry-auth</code> input for raw authentication to registries by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/887">docker/login-action#887</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@aws-sdk/client-ecr</code> to 3.890.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/882">docker/login-action#882</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/890">docker/login-action#890</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@aws-sdk/client-ecr-public</code> to 3.890.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/882">docker/login-action#882</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/890">docker/login-action#890</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.62.1 to 0.63.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/883">docker/login-action#883</a></li> <li>Bump brace-expansion from 1.1.11 to 1.1.12 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/880">docker/login-action#880</a></li> <li>Bump undici from 5.28.4 to 5.29.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/879">docker/login-action#879</a></li> <li>Bump tmp from 0.2.3 to 0.2.4 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/881">docker/login-action#881</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/compare/v3.5.0...v3.6.0">https://github.com/docker/login-action/compare/v3.5.0...v3.6.0</a></p> <h2>v3.5.0</h2> <ul> <li>Support dual-stack endpoints for AWS ECR by <a href="https://github.com/Spacefish"><code>@Spacefish</code></a> <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/874">docker/login-action#874</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/876">docker/login-action#876</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@aws-sdk/client-ecr</code> to 3.859.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/860">docker/login-action#860</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/878">docker/login-action#878</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@aws-sdk/client-ecr-public</code> to 3.859.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/860">docker/login-action#860</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/878">docker/login-action#878</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.57.0 to 0.62.1 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/870">docker/login-action#870</a></li> <li>Bump form-data from 2.5.1 to 2.5.5 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/875">docker/login-action#875</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/compare/v3.4.0...v3.5.0">https://github.com/docker/login-action/compare/v3.4.0...v3.5.0</a></p> <h2>v3.4.0</h2> <ul> <li>Bump <code>@actions/core</code> from 1.10.1 to 1.11.1 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/791">docker/login-action#791</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@aws-sdk/client-ecr</code> to 3.766.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/789">docker/login-action#789</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/856">docker/login-action#856</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@aws-sdk/client-ecr-public</code> to 3.758.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/789">docker/login-action#789</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/856">docker/login-action#856</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.35.0 to 0.57.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/801">docker/login-action#801</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/806">docker/login-action#806</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/858">docker/login-action#858</a></li> <li>Bump cross-spawn from 7.0.3 to 7.0.6 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/814">docker/login-action#814</a></li> <li>Bump https-proxy-agent from 7.0.5 to 7.0.6 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/823">docker/login-action#823</a></li> <li>Bump path-to-regexp from 6.2.2 to 6.3.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/pull/777">docker/login-action#777</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/compare/v3.3.0...v3.4.0">https://github.com/docker/login-action/compare/v3.3.0...v3.4.0</a></p> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/commit/650006c6eb7dba73a995cc03b0b2d7f5ca915bee"><code>650006c</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/issues/960">#960</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/aws-sdk-dependenc...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/commit/99df1a3f6d65e48177ea57671a50e2242eae4b63"><code>99df1a3</code></a> chore: update generated content</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/commit/3ab375f324f46da5f6901efeda4be4e2566ebaa2"><code>3ab375f</code></a> build(deps): bump the aws-sdk-dependencies group across 1 directory with 2 up...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/commit/39d85804ae465a1816c68ff58158ec66883981b4"><code>39d8580</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/issues/970">#970</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/docker/actions-to...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/commit/4eefcd33ca7213989697445a78b6730274bfaba6"><code>4eefcd3</code></a> chore: update generated content</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/commit/56d092c8b3f04006c22f4fc20a2b3d2442caed56"><code>56d092c</code></a> build(deps): bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.86.0 to 0.90.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/commit/e2e31ca87063ae00fd41ad3b9c548dd8ec24c5ff"><code>e2e31ca</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/issues/976">#976</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/actions/core-3.0.1</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/commit/0bced941e843afc786fbfd58b1c6c13ca11e09c9"><code>0bced94</code></a> chore: update generated content</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/commit/3e75a0f266b07e09777a621d0ca5f4432ef9f10c"><code>3e75a0f</code></a> build(deps): bump <code>@actions/core</code> from 3.0.0 to 3.0.1</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/commit/365bebd9d646160567ebad47824f026e09ee6970"><code>365bebd</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/login-action/issues/984">#984</a> from docker/dependabot/github_actions/aws-actions/con...</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/docker/login-action/compare/v3...v4">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=docker/login-action&package-manager=github_actions&previous-version=3&new-version=4)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-06-04 22:21:13 -07:00
dependabot[bot]	b03e114d89	build(deps): bump docker/setup-buildx-action from 3 to 4 (#7322 ) Bumps [docker/setup-buildx-action](https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action) from 3 to 4. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/releases">docker/setup-buildx-action's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v4.0.0</h2> <ul> <li>Node 24 as default runtime (requires <a href="https://github.com/actions/runner/releases/tag/v2.327.1">Actions Runner v2.327.1</a> or later) by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/483">docker/setup-buildx-action#483</a></li> <li>Remove deprecated inputs/outputs by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/464">docker/setup-buildx-action#464</a></li> <li>Switch to ESM and update config/test wiring by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/481">docker/setup-buildx-action#481</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@actions/core</code> from 1.11.1 to 3.0.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/475">docker/setup-buildx-action#475</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.63.0 to 0.79.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/482">docker/setup-buildx-action#482</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/485">docker/setup-buildx-action#485</a></li> <li>Bump js-yaml from 4.1.0 to 4.1.1 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/452">docker/setup-buildx-action#452</a></li> <li>Bump lodash from 4.17.21 to 4.17.23 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/472">docker/setup-buildx-action#472</a></li> <li>Bump minimatch from 3.1.2 to 3.1.5 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/480">docker/setup-buildx-action#480</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.12.0...v4.0.0">https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.12.0...v4.0.0</a></p> <h2>v3.12.0</h2> <ul> <li>Deprecate <code>install</code> input by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/455">docker/setup-buildx-action#455</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.62.1 to 0.63.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/434">docker/setup-buildx-action#434</a></li> <li>Bump brace-expansion from 1.1.11 to 1.1.12 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/436">docker/setup-buildx-action#436</a></li> <li>Bump form-data from 2.5.1 to 2.5.5 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/432">docker/setup-buildx-action#432</a></li> <li>Bump undici from 5.28.4 to 5.29.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/435">docker/setup-buildx-action#435</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.11.1...v3.12.0">https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.11.1...v3.12.0</a></p> <h2>v3.11.1</h2> <ul> <li>Fix <code>keep-state</code> not being respected by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/429">docker/setup-buildx-action#429</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.11.0...v3.11.1">https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.11.0...v3.11.1</a></p> <h2>v3.11.0</h2> <ul> <li>Keep BuildKit state support by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/427">docker/setup-buildx-action#427</a></li> <li>Remove aliases created when installing by default by <a href="https://github.com/hashhar"><code>@hashhar</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/139">docker/setup-buildx-action#139</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.56.0 to 0.62.1 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/422">docker/setup-buildx-action#422</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/425">docker/setup-buildx-action#425</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.10.0...v3.11.0">https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.10.0...v3.11.0</a></p> <h2>v3.10.0</h2> <ul> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.54.0 to 0.56.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/408">docker/setup-buildx-action#408</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.9.0...v3.10.0">https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.9.0...v3.10.0</a></p> <h2>v3.9.0</h2> <ul> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.48.0 to 0.54.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/402">docker/setup-buildx-action#402</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/404">docker/setup-buildx-action#404</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.8.0...v3.9.0">https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.8.0...v3.9.0</a></p> <h2>v3.8.0</h2> <ul> <li>Make cloud prefix optional to download buildx if driver is cloud by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/390">docker/setup-buildx-action#390</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@actions/core</code> from 1.10.1 to 1.11.1 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/370">docker/setup-buildx-action#370</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.39.0 to 0.48.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/389">docker/setup-buildx-action#389</a></li> <li>Bump cross-spawn from 7.0.3 to 7.0.6 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/pull/382">docker/setup-buildx-action#382</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.7.1...v3.8.0">https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3.7.1...v3.8.0</a></p> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/commit/d7f5e7f509e45cec5c76c4d5afdd7de93d0b3df5"><code>d7f5e7f</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/issues/489">#489</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/docker/actions-to...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/commit/92bc5c9777806d0a73d9d668ba2114fa1177f164"><code>92bc5c9</code></a> chore: update generated content</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/commit/da11e35abee0f20cb4f1c1b7c461d37c29be52f5"><code>da11e35</code></a> build(deps): bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.79.0 to 0.90.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/commit/f021e162ef95b6fba51af1c6674f537f25bce851"><code>f021e16</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/issues/492">#492</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/undici-6.24.1</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/commit/b5af94fab700aee0c64d6077e0e34ae987815b67"><code>b5af94f</code></a> chore: update generated content</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/commit/16ad9776a801d0c47f0a05f007b88a3789aa8ab6"><code>16ad977</code></a> build(deps): bump undici from 6.23.0 to 6.25.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/commit/d7a12d7df895b33bd02a9b4bf62a12f2b9a24458"><code>d7a12d7</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/issues/495">#495</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/glob-10.5.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/commit/28ff27de4eed7518d361591f2cd1dfb69c34a7cb"><code>28ff27d</code></a> build(deps): bump glob from 10.3.12 to 13.0.6</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/commit/daf436b50e13d9053b9730cbc16516891878b019"><code>daf436b</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/issues/496">#496</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/fast-xml-parser-5...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/commit/9725348367859764880f2f2e688a6b0c353e3f35"><code>9725348</code></a> chore: update generated content</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/compare/v3...v4">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-06-03 23:24:39 -07:00
dependabot[bot]	4c4506fe16	build(deps): bump docker/metadata-action from 5 to 6 (#7321 ) Bumps [docker/metadata-action](https://github.com/docker/metadata-action) from 5 to 6. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/releases">docker/metadata-action's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v6.0.0</h2> <ul> <li>Node 24 as default runtime (requires <a href="https://github.com/actions/runner/releases/tag/v2.327.1">Actions Runner v2.327.1</a> or later) by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/605">docker/metadata-action#605</a></li> <li>List inputs now preserve <code>#</code> inside values while still supporting full-line <code>#</code> comments by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/607">docker/metadata-action#607</a></li> <li>Switch to ESM and update config/test wiring by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/602">docker/metadata-action#602</a></li> <li>Bump lodash from 4.17.21 to 4.17.23 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/588">docker/metadata-action#588</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@actions/core</code> from 1.11.1 to 3.0.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/599">docker/metadata-action#599</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@actions/github</code> from 6.0.1 to 9.0.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/597">docker/metadata-action#597</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.68.0 to 0.79.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/604">docker/metadata-action#604</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@isaacs/brace-expansion</code> from 5.0.0 to 5.0.1 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/600">docker/metadata-action#600</a></li> <li>Bump semver from 7.7.3 to 7.7.4 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/603">docker/metadata-action#603</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/compare/v5.10.0...v6.0.0">https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/compare/v5.10.0...v6.0.0</a></p> <h2>v5.10.0</h2> <ul> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.66.0 to 0.68.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/559">docker/metadata-action#559</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/569">docker/metadata-action#569</a></li> <li>Bump js-yaml from 3.14.1 to 3.14.2 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/564">docker/metadata-action#564</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/compare/v5.9.0...v5.10.0">https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/compare/v5.9.0...v5.10.0</a></p> <h2>v5.9.0</h2> <ul> <li>Add <code>tag-names</code> output to return tag names without image base name by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/553">docker/metadata-action#553</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@babel/runtime-corejs3</code> from 7.14.7 to 7.28.2 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/539">docker/metadata-action#539</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.62.1 to 0.66.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/555">docker/metadata-action#555</a></li> <li>Bump brace-expansion from 1.1.11 to 1.1.12 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/540">docker/metadata-action#540</a></li> <li>Bump csv-parse from 5.6.0 to 6.1.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/532">docker/metadata-action#532</a></li> <li>Bump semver from 7.7.2 to 7.7.3 in in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/554">docker/metadata-action#554</a></li> <li>Bump tmp from 0.2.3 to 0.2.5 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/541">docker/metadata-action#541</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/compare/v5.8.0...v5.9.0">https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/compare/v5.8.0...v5.9.0</a></p> <h2>v5.8.0</h2> <ul> <li>New <code>is_not_default_branch</code> global expression by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/535">docker/metadata-action#535</a></li> <li>Allow to match part of the git tag or value for semver/pep440 types by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/536">docker/metadata-action#536</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/537">docker/metadata-action#537</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@actions/github</code> from 6.0.0 to 6.0.1 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/523">docker/metadata-action#523</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.56.0 to 0.62.1 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/526">docker/metadata-action#526</a></li> <li>Bump form-data from 2.5.1 to 2.5.5 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/533">docker/metadata-action#533</a></li> <li>Bump moment-timezone from 0.5.47 to 0.6.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/525">docker/metadata-action#525</a></li> <li>Bump semver from 7.7.1 to 7.7.2 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/524">docker/metadata-action#524</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/compare/v5.7.0...v5.8.0">https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/compare/v5.7.0...v5.8.0</a></p> <h2>v5.7.0</h2> <ul> <li>Global expressions support for labels and annotations by <a href="https://github.com/crazy-max"><code>@crazy-max</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/489">docker/metadata-action#489</a></li> <li>Support disabling outputs as environment variables by <a href="https://github.com/omus"><code>@omus</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/497">docker/metadata-action#497</a></li> <li>Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.44.0 to 0.56.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/507">docker/metadata-action#507</a> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/509">docker/metadata-action#509</a></li> <li>Bump csv-parse from 5.5.6 to 5.6.0 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/482">docker/metadata-action#482</a></li> <li>Bump moment-timezone from 0.5.46 to 0.5.47 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/501">docker/metadata-action#501</a></li> <li>Bump semver from 7.6.3 to 7.7.1 in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/pull/504">docker/metadata-action#504</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/compare/v5.6.1...v5.7.0">https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/compare/v5.6.1...v5.7.0</a></p> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/commit/80c7e94dd9b9319bd5eb7a0e0fe9291e23a2a2e9"><code>80c7e94</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/issues/613">#613</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/docker/actions-to...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/commit/8e0ddab90c29de6fff30c787e328563e48106fd0"><code>8e0ddab</code></a> chore: update generated content</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/commit/a8db14bd863c93be08c93c13e1cc816ec5b49b2e"><code>a8db14b</code></a> chore(deps): Bump <code>@docker/actions-toolkit</code> from 0.79.0 to 0.90.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/commit/63a7371ee01888324f2c7b3e18be9ac13b9dbdbc"><code>63a7371</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/issues/617">#617</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/csv-parse-6.2.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/commit/c6916a6cf86608c44ba936565d57f550835ecd45"><code>c6916a6</code></a> chore: update generated content</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/commit/aca9205632182712a2d859059cf12fdc9b2ca202"><code>aca9205</code></a> chore(deps): Bump csv-parse from 6.1.0 to 6.2.1</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/commit/9dcfe60f10ebea72e9e48bf8bf366d01629d045a"><code>9dcfe60</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/issues/629">#629</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/handlebars-4.7.9</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/commit/43dea7677c80686dc31a7b16e61ba9d542081b59"><code>43dea76</code></a> chore: update generated content</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/commit/7a56f5af0aa2d36278ba725bb44091417def9f73"><code>7a56f5a</code></a> chore(deps): Bump handlebars from 4.7.8 to 4.7.9</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/commit/e49e0aa5deac3d581afd6ce80464d84ef68f5ccc"><code>e49e0aa</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/docker/metadata-action/issues/658">#658</a> from docker/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/brace-expansion-5...</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/docker/metadata-action/compare/v5...v6">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-06-03 23:24:06 -07:00
dependabot[bot]	ecef71eb13	build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4 to 6 (#7320 ) Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 4 to 6. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases">actions/checkout's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v6.0.0</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>Update README to include Node.js 24 support details and requirements by <a href="https://github.com/salmanmkc"><code>@salmanmkc</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2248">actions/checkout#2248</a></li> <li>Persist creds to a separate file by <a href="https://github.com/ericsciple"><code>@ericsciple</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2286">actions/checkout#2286</a></li> <li>v6-beta by <a href="https://github.com/ericsciple"><code>@ericsciple</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2298">actions/checkout#2298</a></li> <li>update readme/changelog for v6 by <a href="https://github.com/ericsciple"><code>@ericsciple</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2311">actions/checkout#2311</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v5.0.0...v6.0.0">https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v5.0.0...v6.0.0</a></p> <h2>v6-beta</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <p>Updated persist-credentials to store the credentials under <code>$RUNNER_TEMP</code> instead of directly in the local git config.</p> <p>This requires a minimum Actions Runner version of <a href="https://github.com/actions/runner/releases/tag/v2.329.0">v2.329.0</a> to access the persisted credentials for <a href="https://docs.github.com/en/actions/tutorials/use-containerized-services/create-a-docker-container-action">Docker container action</a> scenarios.</p> <h2>v5.0.1</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>Port v6 cleanup to v5 by <a href="https://github.com/ericsciple"><code>@ericsciple</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2301">actions/checkout#2301</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v5...v5.0.1">https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v5...v5.0.1</a></p> <h2>v5.0.0</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>Update actions checkout to use node 24 by <a href="https://github.com/salmanmkc"><code>@salmanmkc</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2226">actions/checkout#2226</a></li> <li>Prepare v5.0.0 release by <a href="https://github.com/salmanmkc"><code>@salmanmkc</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2238">actions/checkout#2238</a></li> </ul> <h2>⚠️ Minimum Compatible Runner Version</h2> <p><strong>v2.327.1</strong><br /> <a href="https://github.com/actions/runner/releases/tag/v2.327.1">Release Notes</a></p> <p>Make sure your runner is updated to this version or newer to use this release.</p> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v4...v5.0.0">https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v4...v5.0.0</a></p> <h2>v4.3.1</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>Port v6 cleanup to v4 by <a href="https://github.com/ericsciple"><code>@ericsciple</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2305">actions/checkout#2305</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v4...v4.3.1">https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v4...v4.3.1</a></p> <h2>v4.3.0</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>docs: update README.md by <a href="https://github.com/motss"><code>@motss</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/1971">actions/checkout#1971</a></li> <li>Add internal repos for checking out multiple repositories by <a href="https://github.com/mouismail"><code>@mouismail</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/1977">actions/checkout#1977</a></li> <li>Documentation update - add recommended permissions to Readme by <a href="https://github.com/benwells"><code>@benwells</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/pull/2043">actions/checkout#2043</a></li> </ul> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/df4cb1c069e1874edd31b4311f1884172cec0e10"><code>df4cb1c</code></a> Update changelog for v6.0.3 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2446">#2446</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/1cce3390c2bfda521930d01229c073c7ff920824"><code>1cce339</code></a> Fix checkout init for SHA-256 repositories (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2439">#2439</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/900f2210b1d28bbbd0bd22d17926b9e224e8f231"><code>900f221</code></a> fix: expand merge commit SHA regex and add SHA-256 test cases (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2414">#2414</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/0c366fd6a839edf440554fa01a7085ccba70ac98"><code>0c366fd</code></a> Update changelog (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2357">#2357</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd"><code>de0fac2</code></a> Fix tag handling: preserve annotations and explicit fetch-tags (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2356">#2356</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/064fe7f3312418007dea2b49a19844a9ee378f49"><code>064fe7f</code></a> Add orchestration_id to git user-agent when ACTIONS_ORCHESTRATION_ID is set (...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/8e8c483db84b4bee98b60c0593521ed34d9990e8"><code>8e8c483</code></a> Clarify v6 README (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2328">#2328</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/033fa0dc0b82693d8986f1016a0ec2c5e7d9cbb1"><code>033fa0d</code></a> Add worktree support for persist-credentials includeIf (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2327">#2327</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/c2d88d3ecc89a9ef08eebf45d9637801dcee7eb5"><code>c2d88d3</code></a> Update all references from v5 and v4 to v6 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2314">#2314</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/commit/1af3b93b6815bc44a9784bd300feb67ff0d1eeb3"><code>1af3b93</code></a> update readme/changelog for v6 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/checkout/issues/2311">#2311</a>)</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v4...v6">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-06-03 23:23:47 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip	fd10404374	Raise Docker image build timeout Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-03 22:52:33 -05:00
albttx	b1e2a5615b	fix: recover @greptile-apps errors	2026-03-16 10:00:23 +00:00
Albert Le Batteuxandgreptile-apps[bot]	b535860a50	Update .github/workflows/docker.yml Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-03-16 10:00:23 +00:00
Albert Le Batteuxandgreptile-apps[bot]	2b478764a9	Update .github/workflows/docker.yml Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-03-16 10:00:23 +00:00
albttx	88cc8e495c	chore(ci): deploy docker image	2026-03-16 10:00:23 +00:00