From 14bc077440109f65443ad27b5ab1857f1c61d41d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Devin Foley <devin@paperclip.ing>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2026 21:10:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] test: distinguish unavailable Kimi prices from incomplete
 receipts

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
---
 server/src/__tests__/adapter-cost-failure-paths.test.ts | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/server/src/__tests__/adapter-cost-failure-paths.test.ts b/server/src/__tests__/adapter-cost-failure-paths.test.ts
index 141dd5f16b7..239d9ca5ce2 100644
--- a/server/src/__tests__/adapter-cost-failure-paths.test.ts
+++ b/server/src/__tests__/adapter-cost-failure-paths.test.ts
@@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ describe("CLI adapter accounting on timeout", () => {
       context: {}, onLog: async () => {},
     });
     expect(result.timedOut).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.usageComplete).toBe(["codex", "cursor", "gemini"].includes(fixture.name));
+    expect(result.usageComplete).toBe(["codex", "cursor", "gemini", "kimi"].includes(fixture.name));
+    if (fixture.name === "kimi") expect(result.costStatus).toBe("unpriced");
     expect(result.usageBasis).toBe("per_run");
     expect(result.provider).toBeTruthy();
     expect(result.billingType).toBeTruthy();