fix(auth): let Cloud stack admins manage experimental settings (#16907)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - People use experimental settings to opt into product features.
> - Cloud stack Admins can manage their company, but cannot save an
experiment.
> - Requiring an Owner role adds unrelated privileges to this workflow.
> - This pull request gives trusted Cloud stack Admins permission to
update experiments.
> - Other instance administration and platform settings keep their
existing checks.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A person with the Cloud stack Admin role receives “Instance admin access
required” when they enable an experimental setting, such as Fast
responses.

**Expected behavior**

Cloud stack Admins can save editable experimental settings. This
permission does not grant general instance-admin authority. Members,
Support users, and agents cannot change experiments. Cloud-managed and
operator-hidden settings remain protected.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Sign into a Cloud staging workspace as a stack Admin.
2. Open Settings → Experimental.
3. Enable Experimental fast responses.
4. Observe the permission error instead of a saved setting.

**Additional context**

Related: #10343 introduced computed Owner elevation. #15748 added Fast
responses and the company Connections settings page. The roadmap and
existing PRs were checked. This is a small authorization fix for the
existing settings path.

## What Changed

- Derive experiment-management authority from the current trusted Cloud
stack Admin role on each request.
- Apply that authority only to the experimental settings PATCH route.
Keep general settings, environment defaults, and task drain restricted
to instance admins.
- Preserve existing hidden-setting checks, managed feature restrictions,
and activity records.
- Add role and role-downgrade regressions, allowed and denied route
cases, staging coverage, and updated OpenAPI and access documentation.

## Verification

- Before the fix, the Admin fast-response request returned 403 and the
new role assertions failed. The first sandboxed HTTP run could not bind
local sockets; the regression run outside that sandbox reached the
expected authorization failures.
- Focused Cloud actor, settings route, managed-overlay, and health
tests: 149 passed.
- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check` pass.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass.
- Greptile reviewed commit `7c33b90066121f03183579d2fae2650755e025e4` at
5/5. Its one style finding is fixed and resolved.
- The full local `pnpm test:run` did not pass. It reported two early
collection failures before workspace build outputs were ready and a
15-second timeout in the unchanged AgentMail recovery test. The run was
stopped after those failures while the full CI suite continued. No full
local-suite pass is claimed.
- The first current-head CI attempt failed the unchanged Runner test
“preserves a real listening process and its marker when a health RPC
times out” with `runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable` /
`process_identity_changed`. The test passes in a local isolated run.
This recovery does not establish the CI failure's cause. [Failed
job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39332989655/job/118336142261).
The failed shard passed on its single rerun. The failure cause remains
unconfirmed. All CI checks on commit
`7c33b90066121f03183579d2fae2650755e025e4` are now green. [Final CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39332989655).
- No deployed staging behavior is claimed. Manual acceptance after
deployment: as a stack Admin, enable Fast responses, reload, and confirm
Connections appears. Confirm Members and Support users still cannot save
experiments.

## Risks

- This intentionally extends experimental settings write access to Cloud
stack Admins. It does not persist an instance-admin role or expand other
instance controls.
- Production retains its existing managed feature policy. Staging
retains its editable experiment allowlist and protected execution and
owner-elevation settings.
- No database migration or UI change is required.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution, and browser inspection. The runtime does not expose an exact
model snapshot or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
DottaandPaperclip authored and GitHub committed 2026-10-19 21:48:00 -05:00
1 parent 8723580071
commit d9bcf4dfe8
9 files changed
+127 -12

No files matched your search

@@ -520,6 +520,60 @@ describe("instance settings routes", () => {
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
describe("Cloud stack admin experimental settings access", () => {
afterEach(() => vi.unstubAllEnvs());
const stackAdmin = {
type: "board",
userId: "stack-admin-1",
source: "cloud_tenant",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
isInstanceAdmin: false,
canManageExperimentalSettings: true,
};
it("allows a Cloud stack admin to enable fast responses and audits the change", async () => {
const app = createApp(stackAdmin);
await request(app).patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableFastResponses: true }).expect(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ enableFastResponses: true });
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockDb, expect.objectContaining({
actorId: "stack-admin-1",
action: "instance.settings.experimental_updated",
details: expect.objectContaining({ changedKeys: ["enableFastResponses"] }),
}));
});
it.each([
["patch", "/api/instance/settings", { defaultEnvironmentId: null }],
["patch", "/api/instance/settings/general", { censorUsernameInLogs: true }],
["post", "/api/instance/task-drain", {}],
] as const)("keeps %s %s restricted to instance admins", async (method, path, body) => {
const app = createApp(stackAdmin);
await request(app)[method](path).send(body).expect(403);
});
it.each([
{ ...stackAdmin, source: "session" },
{ ...stackAdmin, source: "mcp_oauth" },
{ ...stackAdmin, type: "agent" },
{ ...stackAdmin, canManageExperimentalSettings: false },
])("rejects actors without trusted Cloud experimental authority (%j)", async (actor) => {
const app = createApp(actor);
await request(app).patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableFastResponses: true }).expect(403);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("keeps operator-hidden experimental settings locked for stack admins", async () => {
vi.stubEnv("PAPERCLIP_HIDDEN_SETTINGS", "instance.experimental.enableFastResponses");
const app = createApp(stackAdmin);
await request(app).patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableFastResponses: true }).expect(403);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
it("allows local board users to read and update general settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp(localAdminActor());
@@ -878,7 +932,10 @@ describe("instance settings routes", () => {
vi.stubEnv("PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_TENANT_SERVER_TOKEN", "tenant-token");
vi.stubEnv("PAPERCLIP_PRIMARY_HOST", "team.staging.paperclip.app");
vi.stubEnv("PAPERCLIP_HIDDEN_SETTINGS", "instance.experimental,instance.experimental.*,instance.general.censorUsernameInLogs");
const app = createApp({ type: "board", userId: "admin-1", source: "session", isInstanceAdmin: true });
const app = createApp({
type: "board", userId: "admin-1", source: "cloud_tenant",
isInstanceAdmin: false, canManageExperimentalSettings: true,
});
await request(app).patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental").send({ enableChatConnectors: true }).expect(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ enableChatConnectors: true });
await request(app).patch("/api/instance/settings/general").send({ censorUsernameInLogs: true }).expect(403);
@@ -895,7 +952,7 @@ describe("instance settings routes", () => {
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("still requires instance admin access on staging", async () => {
it("still denies ordinary board members on staging", async () => {
vi.stubEnv("PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_TENANT_SERVER_TOKEN", "tenant-token");
vi.stubEnv("PAPERCLIP_PRIMARY_HOST", "team.staging.paperclip.app");
const app = createApp({ type: "board", userId: "member-1", source: "session", isInstanceAdmin: false });
+1
View File
@@ -788,6 +788,7 @@ async function resolveCloudTenantActorOnce(
// company-scoped. Turning the flag off de-elevates on the next request —
// there is no role row to clean up.
isInstanceAdmin: await resolveOwnerInstanceAdmin(db, stackRole),
canManageExperimentalSettings: stackRole === "admin",
source: "cloud_tenant",
};
}
@@ -270,6 +270,34 @@ describe("resolveCloudTenantActor (shared-pool hardening)", () => {
expect(actor?.memberships?.[0]?.membershipRole).toBe("member");
});
it.each(["admin", "member", "support"])(
"grants experimental settings access only to the admin stack role (%s)",
async (stackRole) => {
const { db, insertedTables } = createFakeDb();
const actor = await resolveCloudTenantActor(
db,
fakeReq({ ...VALID_HEADERS, "x-paperclip-cloud-stack-role": stackRole }),
);
expect(actor?.canManageExperimentalSettings).toBe(stackRole === "admin");
expect(actor?.isInstanceAdmin).toBe(false);
expect(insertedTables).not.toContain(instanceUserRoles);
},
);
it("removes experimental settings access on the next request after a stack admin is demoted", async () => {
const { db } = createFakeDb();
const admin = await resolveCloudTenantActor(
db,
fakeReq({ ...VALID_HEADERS, "x-paperclip-cloud-stack-role": "admin" }),
);
const member = await resolveCloudTenantActor(
db,
fakeReq({ ...VALID_HEADERS, "x-paperclip-cloud-stack-role": "member" }),
);
expect(admin?.canManageExperimentalSettings).toBe(true);
expect(member?.canManageExperimentalSettings).toBe(false);
});
describe("company membership union", () => {
// The primary company id is derived from the stack id; resolve it once
// through the same code path instead of duplicating the hash here.
+12 -4
View File
@@ -96,6 +96,17 @@ function assertCanManageInstanceSettings(req: Request) {
throw forbidden("Instance admin access required");
}
function assertCanManageExperimentalSettings(req: Request) {
if (
req.actor.type === "board"
&& req.actor.source === "cloud_tenant"
&& req.actor.canManageExperimentalSettings
) {
return;
}
assertCanManageInstanceSettings(req);
}
// A task-drain start or stop reads the live drain state, writes an audit
// transaction, and only then mutates the process-local drain state. The
// audit write is an async gap: two overlapping requests can commit their
@@ -252,9 +263,6 @@ export function instanceSettingsRoutes(db: Db, pluginWorkers?: PluginWorkerManag
);
router.get("/instance/settings/experimental", async (req, res) => {
// Experimental settings are readable by any authenticated org member
// or instance admin. Updating them remains instance-admin only because
// this payload includes instance-wide operational controls.
assertBoardOrgAccess(req);
res.json(await svc.getExperimental());
});
@@ -263,7 +271,7 @@ export function instanceSettingsRoutes(db: Db, pluginWorkers?: PluginWorkerManag
"/instance/settings/experimental",
validate(patchInstanceExperimentalSettingsSchema),
async (req, res) => {
assertCanManageInstanceSettings(req);
assertCanManageExperimentalSettings(req);
// Hiding the whole Experimental page floors every toggle; otherwise
// only individually hidden keys are floored.
const hidden = getHiddenSettings();
+2 -1
View File
@@ -6894,8 +6894,9 @@ registry.registerPath({
path: "/api/instance/settings/experimental",
tags: ["instance"],
summary: "Update experimental instance settings",
description: "Requires instance-admin access or a trusted Cloud stack admin. Operator-hidden settings and Cloud-managed feature restrictions still apply. This does not grant access to other instance administration operations.",
request: { body: jsonBody(patchInstanceExperimentalSettingsSchema) },
responses: { 200: r.ok(), 400: r.badRequest, 401: r.unauthorized },
responses: { 200: r.ok(), 400: r.badRequest, 401: r.unauthorized, 403: r.forbidden },
});
registry.registerPath({
+1
View File
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ declare global {
status?: string;
}>;
isInstanceAdmin?: boolean;
canManageExperimentalSettings?: boolean;
keyId?: string;
keyScope?: AgentApiKeyScope;
runId?: string;