Cover supported GFM strikethrough reply content

Add the optional positive formatting case requested by review without changing observer behavior.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
DottaandPaperclip committed 2026-10-30 00:02:36 -05:00
1 parent 980fad261c
commit b9a2571b35
1 file changed
+1
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ import { expect, it } from "vitest";
import { taskReplyContentMatches } from "./task-reply-content.js"; import { taskReplyContentMatches } from "./task-reply-content.js";
it("parses CommonMark escapes, entities, inline formatting and paragraph boundaries", () => { it("parses CommonMark escapes, entities, inline formatting and paragraph boundaries", () => {
expect(taskReplyContentMatches({ body: "Visible" }, "~~Visible~~")).toBe(true);
expect(taskReplyContentMatches({ body: "Couldn't retrieve a_b & c. No retry." }, expect(taskReplyContentMatches({ body: "Couldn't retrieve a_b & c. No retry." },
"**Couldn't retrieve** `a_b` &amp; c.\n\nNo _retry_.")).toBe(true); "**Couldn't retrieve** `a_b` &amp; c.\n\nNo _retry_.")).toBe(true);
expect(taskReplyContentMatches({ body: "Couldn't retrieve a_b & c. No retry. Extra." }, expect(taskReplyContentMatches({ body: "Couldn't retrieve a_b & c. No retry. Extra." },