From 94db03b0f540a498eac92867cb7b8e2413b590c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dotta Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 07:58:35 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] test(evals): bind inventory to reviewed scenario definitions The digest derivation is unchanged. The expected freeze had not followed the five previously reviewed YAML definition corrections. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip --- tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-contract.test.ts | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-contract.test.ts b/tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-contract.test.ts index bbb45455d98..c0078b9995b 100644 --- a/tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-contract.test.ts +++ b/tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-contract.test.ts @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ describe("catalog oracle contract", () => { expect(chatCatalogScenarios).toHaveLength(244); expect(new Set(chatCatalogScenarios.map(row => row.feature)).size).toBe(35); expect(new Set(chatCatalogScenarios.flatMap(row => row.capabilities)).size).toBe(191); - expect(chatCatalogInventoryDigest).toBe("9dc9cf6a5426cf1b56bc30a3571851f233f9dd5e93a1292eaee414d33b52df77"); + expect(chatCatalogInventoryDigest).toBe("0cf530c11449508e91b5ce664d9375fc8e76466fa908255a1af0ff55169d0220"); for (const implementation of chatCatalogCases) expect(chatCatalogScenarios.some(row => row.id === implementation.scenarioId)).toBe(true); }); });